Assumption Leads To Confusion Quotes

We've searched our database for all the quotes and captions related to Assumption Leads To Confusion. Here they are! All 8 of them:

“
The fundamental confusion that makes income bracket data and individual income data seem mutually contradictory is the implicit assumption that people in particular income brackets at a given time are an enduring “class” at that level. If that were true, then trends over time in comparisons between income brackets would be the same as trends over time between individuals. Because that is not the case, the two sets of statistics lead not only to different conclusions but even opposite conclusions.
”
”
Thomas Sowell (Basic Economics: A Common Sense Guide to the Economy)
“
The deceptions of Ana Montes and Bernie Madoff, the confusion over Amanda Knox, the plights of Graham Spanier and Emily Doe are all evidence of the underlying problem we have in making sense of people we do not know. Default to truth is a crucially important strategy that occasionally and unavoidably leads us astray. Transparency is a seemingly commonsense assumption that turns out to be an illusion. Both, however, raise the same question: once we accept our shortcomings, what should we do?
”
”
Malcolm Gladwell (Talking to Strangers: What We Should Know About the People We Don’t Know)
“
Here are some specific rumble starters and questions that we use: The story I make up…(This is by far one of the most powerful rumble tools in the free world. It’s changed every facet of my life. We’ll walk through it in the part “Learning to Rise.”) I’m curious about… Tell me more. That’s not my experience (instead of “You’re wrong about her, him, them, it, this…”). I’m wondering… Help me understand… Walk me through… We’re both dug in. Tell me about your passion around this. Tell me why this doesn’t fit/work for you. I’m working from these assumptions—what about you? What problem are we trying to solve? Sometimes we’ll be an hour into a difficult rumble when someone will bravely say, “Wait. I’m confused. What problem are we trying to solve?” Ninety percent of the time we’ll realize that we’re not on the same page because we skipped the problem identification process and set a meeting intention of finding a solution to a problem that we had yet to define.
”
”
Brené Brown (Dare to Lead: Brave Work. Tough Conversations. Whole Hearts.)
“
A low-context culture is a place where little is left to assumption so things are spelled out explicitly. In contrast, high-context cultures are places where people have significant history together and so a great deal of understanding can be assumed. Things operate in high-context cultures as if everyone there is an insider and knows how to behave. Written instructions and explicit directions are minimal because most people know what to do and how to think. Our families are probably the most tangible examples we have of high-context environments. After years of being together, we know what the unspoken rules are of what to eat, how to celebrate holidays, and how to communicate with each other. Many of our workplaces are the same. We know when to submit check requests, how to publicize an event, and how to dress on “casual” Fridays. New employees joining these kinds of organizations can really feel lost without adequate orientation. And many religious services are also very high context. People routinely stand, bow, or recite creeds that appear very foreign and confusing to someone just joining a religious community for the first time. Discerning whether a culture provides direct and explicit communication versus one that assumes a high degree of shared understanding is a strategic point of knowledge. And leaders need to bear in mind the areas of their own organizational and national culture that are high context and how that affects outsiders when they enter. Table
”
”
David Livermore (Leading with Cultural Intelligence: The New Secret to Success)
“
But traveling faster than light would require infinite energy; it is possible on paper, not in practice. More recently, physicists have theorized other ways that physical travel into the past could be achieved, but they are still exotic and expensive. A technological civilization thousands or more years in advance of our own, one able to harness the energy of its whole galaxy, could create a wormhole linking different points in the fabric of spacetime and send a spaceship through it.8 It is an idea explored widely in science fiction and depicted vividly in Christopher Nolan’s 2014 film Interstellar. But all this is academic for our purposes. For Gleick, what we are really talking about with time travel is a thought experiment about the experiencer—the passenger—in a novel, disjointed relationship to the external world. We can readily perform feats of “mental time travel,” or at least simulate such feats, as well as experience a dissociation between our internal subjective sense of time and the flux of things around us and even our own bodies.9 According to Gleick, part of what suddenly facilitated four-dimensional thinking in both popular writing and the sciences was the changing experience of time in an accelerating society. The Victorian age, with its steam engines and bewildering pace of urban living, increased these experiences of dissociation, and they have only intensified since then. Time travel, Gleick argues, is basically just a metaphor for modernity, and a nifty premise upon which to base literary and cinematic fantasies that repair modernity’s traumas. It also shines a light on how confused we all are about time. The most commonly voiced objection to time travel—and with it, precognition—is that any interaction between the future and past would change the past, and thus create a different future. The familiar term is the grandfather paradox: You can’t go back in time and kill your grandfather because then you wouldn’t have been born to go back in time and kill your grandfather (leaving aside for the moment the assumed inevitability of wanting to kill your grandfather, which is an odd assumption). The technical term for meddling in the past this way is “bilking,” on the analogy of failing to pay a promised debt.10 Whatever you call it, it is the kind of thing that, in Star Trek, would make the Enterprise’s computer start to stutter and smoke and go haywire—the same reaction, in fact, that greets scientific claims of precognition. (As Dean Radin puts it, laboratory precognition results like those cited in the past two chapters “cause faces to turn red and sputtering noises to be issued from upset lips.”11) Information somehow sent backward in time from an event cannot lead to a future that no longer includes that event—and we naturally intuit that it would be very hard not to have such an effect if we meddled in the timeline. Our very presence in the past would change things.
”
”
Eric Wargo (Time Loops: Precognition, Retrocausation, and the Unconscious)
“
Though they are essential, emotions affect judgement when left unchecked. This then leads to invalid assumptions and flawed perceptions. Facts are misconstrued, correlation is confused with causation and reality begins to depart a path of truth.
”
”
John Casey
“
Here are some specific rumble starters and questions that we use: The story I make up…( This is by far one of the most powerful rumble tools in the free world. It’s changed every facet of my life. We’ll walk through it in the part “Learning to Rise.”) I’m curious about… Tell me more. That’s not my experience (instead of “You’re wrong about her, him, them, it, this…”). I’m wondering… Help me understand… Walk me through… We’re both dug in. Tell me about your passion around this. Tell me why this doesn’t fit/ work for you. I’m working from these assumptions—what about you? What problem are we trying to solve? Sometimes we’ll be an hour into a difficult rumble when someone will bravely say, “Wait. I’m confused. What problem are we trying to solve?” Ninety percent of the time we’ll realize that we’re not on the same page because we skipped the problem identification process and set a meeting intention of finding a solution to a problem that we had yet to define.
”
”
Brené Brown (Dare to Lead: Brave Work. Tough Conversations. Whole Hearts.)
“
How much does Delta charge for cancellation? The amount Delta charges for cancellation depends on the fare type and route, and for the most accurate information, it's best to speak directly with a Delta agent at +1-833-301-3812. Delta has removed cancellation fees for most domestic and international flights in Main Cabin and higher fare classes, but this policy does not apply to Basic Economy tickets. If you're not sure what type of ticket you purchased, a quick call to +1-833-301-3812 can clarify your fare details. In cases where fees do apply, the agents at +1-833-301-3812 will also inform you of any possible waivers or travel credits. To avoid unexpected charges or missed refund opportunities, consult +1-833-301-3812 before canceling. For non-refundable tickets, Delta generally does not provide cash refunds but may offer eCredits after deducting a cancellation fee, which you can confirm by calling +1-833-301-3812. The standard cancellation fee for international non-refundable tickets may range between $200 and $400, but this depends heavily on the destination and fare class—something the experts at +1-833-301-3812 can explain in real time. Some travelers may qualify for exceptions under special circumstances like medical emergencies or schedule changes, and calling +1-833-301-3812 could lead to a reduced or waived fee. Whether you're canceling a trip entirely or planning to rebook later, +1-833-301-3812 can help you make the best financial decision. Don’t make assumptions about fees—verify every detail with +1-833-301-3812. Refundable tickets offer greater flexibility and usually allow cancellations without penalties, but conditions may still apply, and +1-833-301-3812 can help you navigate them. Even refundable fares may come with restrictions on group bookings, discounted rates, or corporate travel deals, so it’s smart to call +1-833-301-3812 for a personalized assessment. Delta also allows full refunds for cancellations made within 24 hours of booking, regardless of fare type, and you can confirm your eligibility by speaking with +1-833-301-3812. In scenarios involving credit card disputes or insurance claims, +1-833-301-3812 can also help you gather the required documentation. When in doubt, rely on +1-833-301-3812 to avoid confusion or loss. Passengers who booked award tickets using SkyMiles also face specific cancellation policies, and to understand how miles and fees are affected, it’s best to reach out to +1-833-301-3812. Delta has waived many fees on award ticket changes and cancellations, but this depends on your membership tier and route. If you’re unsure whether your SkyMiles booking is eligible for a fee-free cancellation, the team at +1-833-301-3812 can confirm in minutes. They’ll also guide you through how miles are reinstated and whether taxes and fees are refunded. Booking with miles doesn't guarantee a free cancellation—verify everything first through +1-833-301-3812. If your flight is canceled by Delta due to weather or operational issues, the airline typically waives cancellation fees, and you’re often entitled to a full refund or free rebooking—call +1-833-301-3812 to take full advantage. These cases are handled differently from voluntary cancellations, and +1-833-301-3812 can confirm your rights under the airline’s contract of carriage. Whether you want to accept a refund or be rebooked on another flight, +1-833-301-3812 will help manage the process quickly. For last-minute changes or travel disruptions, the fastest way to find a solution is by calling +1-833-301-3812. Take the guesswork out of Delta cancellations—get the facts you need from +1-833-301-3812 today.
”
”
airline travel helpdesk