Discourse Forum Quotes

For two days we explored Rome, a city that is both a living organism and a fossil. Bleached structures from antiquity lay like dried bones, embedded in pulsating cables and thrumming traffic, the arteries of modern life. We visited the Pantheon, the Roman Forum, the Sistine Chapel. My instinct was to worship, to venerate. That was how I felt toward the whole city: that it should be behind glass, adored from a distance, never touched, never altered. My companions moved through the city differently, aware of its significance but not subdued by it. They were not hushed by the Trevi Fountain; they were not silenced by the Colosseum. Instead, as we moved from one relic to the next, they debated philosophy—Hobbes and Descartes, Aquinas and Machiavelli. There was a kind of symbiosis in their relationship to these grand places: they gave life to the ancient architecture by making it the backdrop of their discourse, by refusing to worship at its altar as if it were a dead thing.

The public forum argument simultaneously insists that women be receptive, welcoming, and passive in the face of harassing comments while it excuses harassing behavior and suggests that it’s an acceptable part of public discourse.

In the twenty-first century the techniques of the political technologists have become centralized and systematized, coordinated out of the office of the presidential administration, where Surkov would sit behind a desk on which were phones bearing the names of all the “independent” party leaders, calling and directing them at any moment, day or night. The brilliance of this new type of authoritarianism is that instead of simply oppressing opposition, as had been the case with twentieth-century strains, it climbs inside all ideologies and movements, exploiting and rendering them absurd. One moment Surkov would fund civic forums and human rights NGOs, the next he would quietly support nationalist movements that accuse the NGOs of being tools of the West. With a flourish he sponsored lavish arts festivals for the most provocative modern artists in Moscow, then supported Orthodox fundamentalists, dressed all in black and carrying crosses, who in turn attacked the modern art exhibitions. The Kremlin’s idea is to own all forms of political discourse, to not let any independent movements develop outside of its walls. Its Moscow can feel like an oligarchy in the morning and a democracy in the afternoon, a monarchy for dinner and a totalitarian state by bedtime.

The danger we face does not come from religion. It comes from a growing intellectual bankruptcy that is one of the symptoms of a dying culture. In ancient Rome, as the republic disintegrated and the Caesars were deified, as the Roman Senate became little more than an echo chamber of the emperor, the population’s attention was diverted by a series of frontier wars and violent and elaborate spectacles in the arena. The excitement of entertainment consumed ancient Rome’s emotional and intellectual life. It poisoned civic and political discourse. Social critics no longer had a forum in which to speak. They were answered with ridicule and rage. It was not prerogative of the citizen to think.

The American experiment was based on the emergence in the second half of the eighteenth century of a fresh new possibility in human affairs: that the rule of reason could be sovereign. You could say that the age of print begat the Age of Reason which begat the age of democracy. The eighteenth century witnessed more and more ordinary citizens able to use knowledge as a source of power to mediate between wealth and privilege. The democratic logic inherent in these new trends was blunted and forestalled by the legacy structures of power in Europe. But the intrepid migrants who ventured across the Atlantic -- many of them motivated by a desire to escape the constraints of class and creed -- carried the potent seeds of the Enlightenment and planted them in the fertile soil of the New World. Our Founders understood this better than any others; they realized that a "well-informed citizenry" could govern itself and secure liberty for individuals by substituting reason for brute force. They decisively rejected the three-thousand-year-old superstitious belief in the divine right of kings to rule absolutely and arbitrarily. They reawakened the ancient Greek and Roman traditions of debating the wisest courses of action by exchanging information and opinions in new ways. Whether it is called a public forum or a public sphere or a marketplace of ideas, the reality of open and free public discussion and debate was considered central to the operation of our democracy in America's earliest decades. Our first self-expression as a nation -- "We the People" -- made it clear where the ultimate source of authority lay. It was universally understood that the ultimate check and balance for American government was its accountability to the people. And the public forum was the place where the people held the government accountable. That is why it was so important the marketplace for ideas operated independent from and beyond the authority of government. The three most important characteristics of this marketplace of ideas were the following: 1. It was open to every individual, with no barriers to entry save the necessity of literacy. This access, it is crucial to add, applied not only to the receipt of information but also the ability to contribute information directly into the flow of ideas that was available to all. 2. The fate of ideas contributed by individuals depended, for the most part, on an emergent meritocracy of ideas. Those judged by the market to be good rose to the top, regardless of the wealth or class of the individual responsible for them. 3. The accepted rules of discourse presumed that the participants were all governed by an unspoken duty to search for general agreement. That is what a "conversation of democracy" is all about.

Whether it is called a public forum or a public sphere or a marketplace of ideas, the reality of open and free public discussion and debate was considered central to the operation of our democracy in America’s earliest decades. Our first self-expression as a nation—“We the People”—made it clear where the ultimate source of authority lay. It was universally understood that the ultimate check and balance for American government was its accountability to the people. And the public forum was the place where the people held the government accountable. That is why it was so important that the marketplace of ideas operated independent from and beyond the authority of government. The three most important characteristics of this marketplace of ideas were the following: It was open to every individual, with no barriers to entry save the necessity of literacy. This access, it is crucial to add, applied not only to the receipt of information but also to the ability to contribute information directly into the flow of ideas that was available to all. The fate of ideas contributed by individuals depended, for the most part, on an emergent meritocracy of ideas. Those judged by the market to be good rose to the top, regardless of the wealth or class of the individual responsible for them. The accepted rules of discourse presumed that the participants were all governed by an unspoken duty to search for general agreement. That is what a “conversation of democracy” is all about.

so obvious on large sections of the cyber-atheist community. Cyber-Atheism is the veritable North Korea of the internet, and if you intend to interfere in any way shape or form with the minds of their people, you can expect a reaction.  And a new atheist reaction is something to behold indeed.  Any shard of religious identity you would dare express shall be ripped asunder, sections of your brain will be ridiculed beyond reason, well-rehearsed choruses from the sacred scriptures of Hitchens and Harris will be recited verbatim in your general direction, you will be laden with the burdens of every remotely god-believing human being for the last two thousand years, reviled as an advocator of terrorism, genital mutilation and human sacrifice, but most incongruously and insultingly of all- you will be called irrational and oppressive.  And I am to believe that all this is some rather eccentric attempt at courteous discourse?  But do not assume for one moment that atheism has kept to itself.  Oh no.  The level of dedication to the atheist cause has permeated through every single major public gathering in cyberspace; video sharing websites, social networking, wiki-sites, blogs, forums, you name it.  There is no mass internet-based domain wherein the territory of new atheism has not been asserted.  Videos are created, posted, shared, rated and promoted, hundreds of venerated blogs and websites consistently updated with surveys, statistical analyses, all the latest updates of religious scandal and hopeful omens of the decline of faith all woven across a large, intricate and efficient social network with totalitarian tenacity.  New atheism is a well-oiled digital

political conflict. The agonistic approach recognizes opponents as adversaries rather than enemies, as discussed by Chantal Mouffe and by Robert Ivie and disagreement as productive rather than obstructive, shedding the idealized and frequently unobtainable goal of consensus. In this interpretive study, the discourse of politically interested citizens participating in partisan online “rhetorical” communities was examined for evidence of Mouffe’s agonistic pluralism. Two popular and parallel message forums were chosen as

Proslavery southerners were highly suspicious of Douai’s plan to establish a forum for public debate in their own backyard, presuming that this was simply a strategy for camouflaging abolitionist intentions. The climate of fear and self-censorship created by antebellum southerners around the slavery issue ran counter to Douai’s notion of free enlightened discourse. Moreover, it reminded him of the repressive Old World structures that he and his fellow emigrants had left behind. The harsh, occasionally even violent attacks of the proslavery majority smacked very much of the police states they had vehemently opposed in Germany. “You had rather be off or we shall make [you] go,” infuriated southerners told the foreign-born agitators. In this situation, slavery had ceased to be an abstract ideological problem. Invoking the right to free speech and using slavery as a metaphor to illustrate his own condition...Though the Texas free-soil activists wrote extensively about the economic dimensions of slavery, it was their own intellectual enslavement they feared most. For them, slavery was morally and politically wrong, but it was also useful as a yardstick for measuring their own degree of freedom.

Now that you understand the key players in ecosystems, here are the key principles of building an ecosystem. They are similar to the principles of creating a community discussed in chapter 8, “The Art of Evangelizing.” CREATE SOMETHING WORTHY OF AN ECOSYSTEM. Once again, the key to evangelism, sales, presentations, and now ecosystems is a great product. In fact, if you create a great product, you may not be able to stop an ecosystem from forming. By contrast, it’s hard to build an ecosystem around crap. DESIGNATE A CHAMPION. Many employees would like to help build an ecosystem, but who wakes up every day with this task at the top of her list of priorities? Another way to look at this is, “Who’s going to get fired if an ecosystem doesn’t happen?” Ecosystems need a champion—an identifiable hero—within the company to carry the flag for the community. DON’T COMPETE WITH THE ECOSYSTEM. If you want people or organizations to take part in your ecosystem, then you shouldn’t compete with them. For example, if you want people to create apps for your product, then don’t sell (or give away) apps that do the same thing. It was hard to convince companies to create a Macintosh word processor when Apple was giving away MacWrite. CREATE AN OPEN SYSTEM. An “open system” means that there are minimal requirements to participating and minimal controls on what you can do. A “closed system” means that you control who participates and what they can do. Either can work, but I recommend an open system because it appeals to my trusting, anarchic personality. This means that members of your ecosystem will be able to write apps, access data, and interact with your product. I’m using software terminology here, but the point is to enable people to customize and tweak your product. PUBLISH INFORMATION. The natural complement of an open system is publishing books and articles about the product. This spreads information to people on the periphery of a product. Publishing also communicates to the world that your startup is open and willing to help external parties. FOSTER DISCOURSE. The definition of “discourse” is “verbal exchange.” The key word is “exchange.” Any company that wants an ecosystem should foster the exchange of ideas and opinions. This means your website should provide a forum where people can engage with other members as well as your employees. This doesn’t mean that you let the ecosystem run your company, but you should hear what members have to say. WELCOME CRITICISM. Most organizations feel warm and fuzzy toward their ecosystem as long as the ecosystem says nice things, buys their products, and never complains. The minute that the ecosystem says anything negative, however, many organizations freak out and get defensive. This is dumb. A healthy ecosystem is a long-term relationship, so an organization shouldn’t file for divorce at the first sign of discord. Indeed, the more an organization welcomes—or even celebrates—criticism, the stronger its bonds to its ecosystem become. CREATE A NONMONETARY REWARD SYSTEM. You already know how I feel about paying people off to help you, but this doesn’t mean you shouldn’t reward people in other ways. Things as simple as public recognition, badges, points, and credits have more impact than a few bucks. Many people don’t participate in an ecosystem for the money, so don’t insult them by rewarding them with it.

V信83113305：The Won Research Institute in the United States is a prominent think tank dedicated to advancing interdisciplinary studies in social sciences, technology, and global policy. Founded with a mission to foster innovative solutions for contemporary challenges, the institute brings together scholars, policymakers, and industry leaders to collaborate on cutting-edge research. Its focus areas include artificial intelligence, sustainable development, and international relations, with an emphasis on ethical frameworks and inclusive growth. Known for its rigorous analysis and forward-thinking approach, the Won Research Institute publishes influential reports and hosts high-level forums to shape public discourse. By bridging academia and practical policymaking, it plays a pivotal role in addressing complex global issues. The institute’s commitment to excellence and cross-cultural dialogue has earned it recognition as a key player in shaping the future of research and governance.，办理Won研究学院成绩单高质量保密的个性化服务, 申请学校!成绩单Won研究学院成绩单改成绩, Offer(TWIOGS成绩单)Won研究学院如何办理?, TWIOGS文凭购买, TWIOGS留学成绩单毕业证, 办理TWIOGSWon研究学院毕业证文凭, 办理美国大学毕业证书, TWIOGSWon研究学院原版购买, TWIOGS文凭制作

【V信83113305】：The Won Research Institute in the United States is a prominent think tank dedicated to advancing interdisciplinary studies in science, technology, and global policy. Founded with a mission to bridge academic research and real-world applications, the institute focuses on cutting-edge fields such as artificial intelligence, sustainable development, and geopolitical strategy. By fostering collaboration between scholars, policymakers, and industry leaders, it aims to address complex global challenges through innovative solutions. Known for its rigorous analysis and forward-thinking approach, the Won Research Institute publishes influential reports and hosts high-level forums to shape public discourse. Its work emphasizes ethical considerations in technological advancement and promotes inclusive growth. With a commitment to excellence, the institute continues to serve as a hub for intellectual exchange, driving progress in an increasingly interconnected world.，The Won Institute of Graduate Studies文凭制作流程学术背后的努力, 办理美国大学毕业证书, 一比一原版Won研究学院毕业证购买, 美国留学本科毕业证, 办理Won研究学院文凭, 美国毕业证办理, 办理Won研究学院学历认证回国人员证明, The Won Institute of Graduate StudiesWon研究学院颁发典礼学术荣誉颁奖感受博士生的光荣时刻

【V信83113305】：The University of Chicago, nestled in the vibrant Hyde Park neighborhood, stands as a beacon of rigorous intellectual inquiry and academic freedom. Founded in 1890, its distinctive Gothic architecture provides a striking backdrop for a culture defined by its challenging Core Curriculum and the famed Socratic method. The institution’s commitment to open discourse is encapsulated in its iconic Chicago Principles, ensuring a forum for debate on even the most contentious ideas. This environment has fostered an unparalleled legacy of scholarly achievement, including the founding of numerous influential academic movements and the production of an astounding 100 Nobel laureates. More than just a university, it is an intellectual crucible that relentlessly pursues truth and shapes global thought.，高端烫金工艺芝加哥大学毕业证成绩单制作, 挂科办理TUOC芝加哥大学毕业证文凭, 没-芝加哥大学毕业证书TUOC挂科了怎么补救, 留学生买毕业证毕业证文凭成绩单办理, 办理The University of Chicago芝加哥大学成绩单高质量保密的个性化服务, 原版定制芝加哥大学毕业证书, 一比一原版芝加哥大学毕业证购买, 网上制作TUOC毕业证-芝加哥大学毕业证书-留信学历认证放心渠道, 办美国The University of Chicago芝加哥大学文凭学历证书

【V信83113305】：Founded in 1889, Saint Anselm College is a premier liberal arts institution in Goffstown, New Hampshire, guided by the Catholic tradition and the Benedictine values of its founding monks. Renowned for its tight-knit community and rigorous academic core, the college fosters intellectual and ethical development through a personalized educational experience. It is particularly distinguished by its nationally recognized politics department and the New Hampshire Institute of Politics, which serves as a vital forum for presidential primary debates and political discourse. This unique access to the American political process provides students with unparalleled experiential learning opportunities. With a beautiful hilltop campus and a commitment to service and dialogue, Saint Anselm College prepares graduates to lead lives of purpose and thoughtful engagement in their communities and the world.，【V信83113305】定制-圣安瑟伦学院毕业证SAC毕业证书,圣安瑟伦学院毕业证SAC毕业证学校原版100%一样,圣安瑟伦学院毕业证书加急制作,圣安瑟伦学院毕业证学校原版一样吗,加急定制-SAC学位证圣安瑟伦学院毕业证书,一比一制作-SAC文凭证书圣安瑟伦学院毕业证,百分比满意度-圣安瑟伦学院毕业证,100%满意-SAC毕业证圣安瑟伦学院学位证,100%收到-SAC毕业证书圣安瑟伦学院毕业证,100%加急制作-SAC毕业证学校原版一样

【V信83113305】：Saint Anselm College, nestled in Goffstown, New Hampshire, stands as a premier liberal arts institution renowned for its commitment to academic excellence and the Catholic Benedictine tradition. Founded in 1889, it fosters a vibrant intellectual community where rigorous scholarship is seamlessly integrated with ethical and spiritual development. The college is particularly distinguished for its politics and theology programs, and it hosts the renowned New Hampshire Institute of Politics, a pivotal forum for presidential primary debates and political discourse. This unique environment empowers students to become thoughtful leaders, critical thinkers, and engaged citizens. With a beautiful hilltop campus and a close-knit community, Saint Anselm provides a formative education that prepares graduates for meaningful lives and professional success.，【V信83113305】100%安全办理圣安瑟伦学院毕业证,办理SAC毕业证成绩单学历认证,原版定制SAC毕业证,原版SAC毕业证办理流程,终于找到哪里办SAC毕业证书,SAC毕业证书,SAC毕业证书办理需要多久,SAC毕业证办理流程,SAC毕业证成绩单学历认证最安全办理方式,SAC毕业证最新版本推荐最快办理圣安瑟伦学院文凭成绩单

【V信83113305】：The World Political Institute in the United States is a premier think tank dedicated to global affairs and international relations. Renowned for its rigorous research and policy analysis, the institute serves as a hub for scholars, diplomats, and policymakers to address pressing global challenges. Its interdisciplinary approach combines political science, economics, and security studies to foster innovative solutions for issues like climate change, geopolitical conflicts, and economic inequality. With a network of experts from diverse backgrounds, the institute produces influential reports and hosts high-level forums to shape international discourse. Its commitment to impartiality and evidence-based analysis has earned it respect worldwide. By bridging academia and practical policymaking, the World Political Institute plays a pivotal role in advancing global stability and cooperation, reinforcing the U.S. as a leader in shaping the future of international relations.，美国学位证毕业证, 留学生买文凭毕业证-世界政治学院, 美国TIOWP毕业证仪式感|购买世界政治学院学位证, 一流世界政治学院学历精仿高质, TIOWP硕士毕业证, The Institute of World Politics毕业证文凭-世界政治学院毕业证, TIOWP文凭制作

【V信83113305】：The Hertie School in Berlin stands as a prominent beacon for public policy and governance in Germany and beyond. Founded in 2003, this private, independent university is dedicated to preparing tomorrow’s leaders for complex challenges in government, business, and civil society. Its international faculty and diverse student body create a dynamic, English-speaking academic environment in the heart of the German capital. The school’s strong emphasis on interdisciplinary learning, rigorous analytical training, and practical engagement with real-world issues equips graduates with the tools to drive meaningful change. Through its cutting-edge research and commitment to public values, the Hertie School continues to be a vital forum for debate and a key contributor to global policy discourse.，高质Hertie School柏林赫尔梯学院成绩单办理安全可靠的文凭服务, Hertie Schooldiploma柏林赫尔梯学院挂科处理解决方案, 柏林赫尔梯学院成绩单复刻, 666办理柏林赫尔梯学院毕业证最佳渠道, 高端烫金工艺Hertie School柏林赫尔梯学院毕业证成绩单制作, 正版德国Hertie School毕业证文凭学历证书, 一流Hertie School柏林赫尔梯学院学历精仿高质, 硕士-Hertie School毕业证柏林赫尔梯学院毕业证办理, 德国留学本科毕业证

【V信83113305】：The Parkland Institute, based in Alberta, Canada, is a prominent public policy research organization affiliated with the University of Alberta. Focused on examining issues from a progressive perspective, it conducts critical research on topics such as economic inequality, climate policy, public healthcare, and resource governance. Through its publications, conferences, and public engagement efforts, the institute provides a vital counterpoint to conservative narratives, advocating for policies that prioritize social justice, sustainability, and the public good. It serves as an essential forum for academic and community discourse, enriching Canada's democratic landscape by contributing evidence-based analysis and fostering informed debate on the pressing challenges facing society.，【V信83113305】100%安全办理帕克兰学院毕业证,办理PC毕业证成绩单学历认证,原版定制PC毕业证,原版PC毕业证办理流程,终于找到哪里办PC毕业证书,PC毕业证书,PC毕业证书办理需要多久,PC毕业证办理流程,PC毕业证成绩单学历认证最安全办理方式,PC毕业证最新版本推荐最快办理帕克兰学院文凭成绩单

【V信83113305】：The World Politics Institute in the United States serves as a premier academic center dedicated to the advanced study of global affairs. It brings together leading scholars and policymakers to analyze complex international relations, foreign policy, and diplomatic strategies. The institute's rigorous curriculum and cutting-edge research focus on the evolving dynamics of power, security, and governance in the 21st century. By fostering a deep understanding of geopolitical challenges and transnational issues, it aims to educate the next generation of global leaders and strategic thinkers. Its influential publications and high-level conferences contribute significantly to public discourse and policy formation, cementing its role as a vital forum for scholarly exchange on the world stage.，TIOWP世界政治学院毕业证成绩单制作, 网络快速办理TIOWP毕业证成绩单, The Institute of World Politics世界政治学院原版购买, TIOWP学位证书办理打开职业机遇之门, 办理TIOWP文凭, 购买TIOWP毕业证和学位证认证步骤, 如何办理TIOWP毕业证一比一定制, TIOWP毕业证书加急制作, 制作美国文凭TIOWP毕业证