Collaborative Inquiry Quotes

We've searched our database for all the quotes and captions related to Collaborative Inquiry. Here they are! All 15 of them:

An integral approach is based on one basic idea: no human mind can be 100% wrong. Or, we might say, nobody is smart enough to be wrong all the time. And that means, when it comes to deciding which approaches, methodologies, epistemologies, or ways or knowing are "correct," the answer can only be, "All of them." That is, all of the numerous practices or paradigms of human inquiry — including physics, chemistry, hermeneutics, collaborative inquiry, meditation, neuroscience, vision quest, phenomenology, structuralism, subtle energy research, systems theory, shamanic voyaging, chaos theory, developmental psychology—all of those modes of inquiry have an important piece of the overall puzzle of a total existence that includes, among other many things, health and illness, doctors and patients, sickness and healing.
Ken Wilber
It is time we recognized that the only thing that permits human beings to collaborate with one another in a truly open-ended way is their willingness to have their beliefs modified by new facts. Only openness to evidence and argument will secure a common world for us. Nothing guarantees that reasonable people will agree about everything, of course, but the unreasonable are certain to be divided by their dogmas. This spirit of mutual inquiry is the very antithesis of religious faith.
Sam Harris (The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason)
Having a leader serve as the “questioner in chief” is fine, but it’s not enough. Today’s companies are often tackling complex challenges that require collaborative, multidisciplinary problem solving. Creative thinking must come from all parts of the company (and from outside the company, too). When a business culture is inquisitive, the questioning, learning, and sharing of information becomes contagious—and gives people permission to explore new ideas across boundaries and silos.
Warren Berger (A More Beautiful Question: The Power of Inquiry to Spark Breakthrough Ideas)
At the organizational level, this value can take the form of acquiring the capacity to sustain ongoing evaluative inquiry. This outcome is more likely when participants experience evaluation as a meaningful and productive way to enhance patterns of work and communication. Participatory, collaborative, appreciative, and empowering mechanisms are often at the heart of evaluations where process use is a high priority. These mechanisms can promote stakeholder ownership of the evaluation processes and products and thus enhance process use, as well as use of evaluation findings. For some organizations, evaluation capacity building means that evaluation stakeholders learn how to work effectively with external evaluators. This organizational learning further facilitates the contributions that external evaluation processes and findings can make to the organization’s growth and productivity.
Donald B. Yarbrough (The Program Evaluation Standards: A Guide for Evaluators and Evaluation Users)
On the quantum level, down at the subatomic bottom of everything, there is no such thing as matter. Matter as we know it—everything from rocks to water, bone and blood, flora and fauna, everything, everything—arises out of nothing tangible. The universe appears to be woven from something as immaterial as thought waves. Everything is at base impalpable, discarnate, transmundane. Furthermore, the smallest and most fundamental subatomic particles seem not to exist until they are observed in the process of human inquiry. And so it seems that, as a reader collaborates with an author to envision the story being told in a novel, so all of us collaborate with some author unknown to imagine what occurs in our world as it is and as it will become. In that case, to at least some extent, to a degree we cannot know, we possess the power to weave the lives that will bring us happiness if we’re wise enough to be nice, but not so nice that we’re foolish, and if we realize that our free will and creativity should be used with humility rather than to acquire power to oppress others.
Dean Koontz (The Bad Weather Friend)
Dear Rebecca— You may have picked up on my growing disappointment with you this afternoon as our first meeting progressed. I have to say that though you seem quite personable in your electronic communications, in person your behavior is a little lacking in some of the traits that would let you get from a first to a second date with regularity. If Lovability had a rating system, I would award you 2.5 out of 5 stars; however, if it used a scale that only allowed for integral values, I would unfortunately be forced to round down to two. Here are some suggestions for what you could do to improve the initial impression you make. I am speaking here as a veteran of the online dating scene in LA, which is MUCH more intense than New Jersey’s—there, you are competing with aspiring actors and actresses, and a professionally produced headshot and a warm demeanor are the bare minimum necessary to get in the game. By the end of my first year in LA my askback rate (the rate at which my first dates with women led to second dates) was a remarkable 68%. So I know what I’m talking about. I hope you take this constructive criticism in the manner in which it is intended. 1. Vary your responses to inquiries. When our conversation began, you seemed quite cheerful and animated, but as it progressed you became much less so. I asked you a series of questions that were intended to give you opportunities to reveal more about yourself, but you offered only binary answers, and then, troublingly, no answers at all. If you want your date to go well, you need to display more interest. 2. Direct the flow of conversation. Dialogue is collaborative! One consequence of your reticence was that I was forced to propose all of the topics of discussion, both before and after the transition to more personal subjects. If you contribute topics of your own then it will make you appear more engaged: you should aim to bring up one new subject for every one introduced by your date. 3. Take control of the path of the date. If you want the initial meeting to extend beyond the planned drinks, there are many ways you can go about doing this. You can directly say, for instance, “So I wasn’t thinking about this when you showed up, but…do you have any plans for dinner? I’m starving, and I could really go for some pad thai.” Or you can make a vaguer, more general statement such as “After this, I’m up for whatever,” or “Hey, I don’t really want to go home yet, Bradley: I’m having a lot of fun.” Again, this comes down to a general lack of engagement on your part. Without your feedback I was left to offer a game of Scrabble, which was not the best way to end the meeting. 4. Don’t lie about your ability in Scrabble. I won’t go into an analysis of your strategic and tactical errors here, in the interest of brevity, but your amateurish playing style was quite evident. Now, despite my reservations as expressed above, I really do feel that we had some chemistry. So I would like to give things another chance. Would you respond to this message within the next three days, with a suggestion of a place you’d like us to visit together, or an activity that you believe we would both enjoy? I would be forced to construe a delay of more than three days as an unfortunate sign of indifference. I hope to hear from you soon. Best, Bradley
Dexter Palmer (Version Control)
Effective Peer Coaches emphasize inquiry over advocacy. Too much advocacy can produce learned helplessness. Inquiry builds capacity to improve teaching and learning by helping teachers to be more effective at designing and implementing learning activities that meet the needs of their students.
Lester (Les) J (Joseph) Foltos (Peer Coaching: Unlocking the Power of Collaboration)
For this reason I believe we need to do philosophy with children now more than ever. We have increasingly taken away their free time, their ability to make up their own games, their ability to solve their own problems, their ability to be by themselves and figure out the world on their own terms. We need to restore their relationship with the world around them so they can learn who they are and what matters to them. Doing philosophy with children helps to achieve just that. It restores their relationship with their own and others’ thinking, which is important for creating a community of inquiry and collaboration. In the process, self-knowledge is gained, and with that character and integrity can develop. Once again, we have to embrace the uncertainty inherent in the pursuit of knowledge, as opposed to presuming its certainty.
Anonymous
Ultimately the purpose of Humble Inquiry is to build relationships that lead to trust which, in turn, leads to better communication and collaboration.
Edgar H. Schein (Humble Inquiry: The Gentle Art of Asking Instead of Telling)
The more we remain curious about the other person in the current context—before letting our own expectations and preconceptions creep in—the better our chances are of staying in the right questioning mode. The more we take a collaborative helping purpose into our conversations, the more likely we are to improve the relationship.
Edgar H. Schein (Humble Inquiry: The Gentle Art of Asking Instead of Telling)
Pen pals Charles Darwin made good use of the postal service in his scientific work, corresponding regularly with hundreds of collaborators across more than a dozen fields of inquiry.
Jeremy Utley (Ideaflow: The Only Business Metric That Matters)
When Zeus sees what has happened, he adds an extra gift for free: the capacity for forming friendships and other social bonds. Now humans can cooperate. But not so fast: they still have only the capacity for these things. They have a seed. To develop a truly thriving and well-managed society, humans must make that seed grow, by means of learning, and teaching each other. This is something that we must take charge of ourselves. We are showered with gifts, but they are nothing unless we work out how to collaborate in using them together.
Sarah Bakewell (Humanly Possible: Seven Hundred Years of Humanist Freethinking, Inquiry, and Hope)
Step-by-Step Guide: Connecting with SBCGlobal Customer Service Learn how to contact SBCGlobal customer service +1805-626-8396 by phone or email for internet, phone, or email issues. Find the phone number, email address, and step-by-step guide to reach SBCGlobal support. SBCGlobal, a subsidiary of AT&T, offers dedicated customer service to assist users with their email accounts. Whether you're facing technical issues, need help with account settings, or have inquiries about your email, SBCGlobal's dedicated customer service team is here to help. You can reach their expert support team at +1805-626-8396 (toll-free). Available 24/7, the team is ready to assist with troubleshooting, account management, and any other email-related concerns. With multiple support channels available, including phone, live chat, email, and social media, SBCGlobal ensures that you have access to the assistance you need, whenever you need it. This guide will walk you through the various methods to contact +1805-626-8396 SBCGlobal customer service, offering detailed steps and tips for each option. SBCGlobal Yahoo Mail: Enhancing Your Email Experience SBCGlobal Yahoo Mail is the result of a strategic collaboration between AT&T and Yahoo, initially connected to SBC Communications. Following the merger of SBC with AT&T, the email service became an integral part of AT&T's offerings, combining the strengths of both companies to deliver a seamless email experience. By integrating SBCGlobal with Yahoo’s robust platform, users benefit from a more efficient and feature-rich email service. This integration ensures access to a wide range of features, including advanced security options, ample storage, and a user-friendly interface, all supported by AT&T's reliable customer service. In today’s digital age, email remains a vital communication tool, and having dependable customer support is crucial. AT&T recognizes this need and provides comprehensive customer service to address any issues you may encounter with SBCGlobal Yahoo Mail. Whether you're facing technical difficulties, need help with account settings, or have questions about your email, AT&T's customer support team is ready to assist you. You can reach their dedicated support team at +1805-626-8396 (toll-free). Available 24/7, their team is equipped to help with troubleshooting, account management, and any other email-related concerns. This round-the-clock availability ensures that you receive timely assistance, no matter when you need it. In addition to reactive support, AT&T's customer service also focuses on empowering users with knowledge. They offer valuable tips and best practices to help you make the most of your SBCGlobal Yahoo Mail experience. From optimizing your email settings to enhancing security measures, their support team is committed to ensuring you have a smooth and efficient email experience. This comprehensive guide will provide you with all the necessary details to maximize your SBCGlobal Yahoo Mail experience. Whether you need to contact customer support, learn about new features, or troubleshoot common issues, this guide covers it all, ensuring you have the resources and support needed to stay connected.
Garfield
Distrust of collaboration runs especially deep in the corporate world, where the patent system often closes down lines of inquiry. Ego is another obstacle. Researchers who sing the praises of collective toil can bristle when it threatens their patch, and many still prefer to keep their data as private as possible. Even if pooling knowledge and insights serves the greater good, it also makes it harder to assign kudos, tenure, and grant money.
Carl Honoré (The Slow Fix: Solve Problems, Work Smarter, and Live Better In a World Addicted to Speed – A Revolutionary Guide to Sustainable Solutions and Personal Success)
To the public, they were either naive jihadi brides or calculating monsters. But most of the women in this book were neither passive nor predatory, and trying to pin down their degree of agency seemed to be only one line of inquiry, and certainly not the most revealing. Some collaborated or acted knowingly; some were so young that, despite the outward appearance of deliberate choice, they were not mature enough to exercise anything approaching adult judgement.
Azadeh Moaveni (Guest House for Young Widows: Among the Women of ISIS)