“
Sometimes, all you had to do was exist in order to be someone's saviour.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
It’s more difficult to create the problem than to solve it. All the person trying to solve the problem has to do is always respect the problem’s creator.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #3))
“
Watching people is a bit of a hobby of mine. It's quite fascinating, really.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Even when you’re at the top, there’s always something higher,
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Which is harder: devising an unsolvable problem, or solving that problem?
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
That's what happens when you free people from the restraints of time. They make their own rigid schedule.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
he presented me with a mathematical conundrum,” he said. “It’s a famous one, the P = NP problem. Basically, it asks whether it’s more difficult to think of the solution to a problem yourself or to ascertain if someone else’s answer to the same problem is correct.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #3))
“
Frohike... had a long-standing crush on Dana Scully, but basically it was all talk. Mulder suspected Frohike would turn into a jittering mass of nerves if Scully ever consented to go out with him.
”
”
Kevin J. Anderson (The X-Files: Ruins)
“
Tunnel vision is no way to make it as a researcher. Your assumptions are your worst enemies. Trust them too much, and you’ll fail to see what’s right under your nose.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
It seems to me that you have two options: hide the fact that anything happened, or hide the fact that you had anything to do with it.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
The sun had set. Night had come to the city. How easy it would be if everything went dark, and the world ended right here, right now. What a relief it would be.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Power not only corrupts but also magnifies existing psychopathologies, even as it creates new ones. Fostered by the flattery of underlings and the chants of crowds, a political leader’s grandiosity may morph into grotesque delusions of grandeur. Sociopathic traits may be amplified as the leader discovers that he can violate the norms of civil society and even commit crimes with impunity. And the leader who rules through fear, lies, and betrayal may become increasingly isolated and paranoid, as the loyalty of even his closest confidants must forever be suspect.
”
”
Bandy X. Lee (The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President)
“
On Algebra - "We're a month into it, and I'm planning to start a real protest movement, one to have X and Y removed from the alphabet. Z is also suspect as far as I'm concerned...Damn it! They put a man on the moon; can't they find some way to end the scourge of Algebra?
”
”
Huston Piner (My Life as a Myth)
“
A veces, una persona puede salvar a otra por el hecho mero de existir.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Kusanagi had met plenty of good, admirable people who’d been turned into murderers by circumstance. There was something about them he always seemed to sense, an aura that they shared. Somehow, their transgression freed them from the confines of a mortal existence, allowing them to perceive the great truths of the universe. At the same time, it meant they had one foot in forbidden territory. They straddled the line between sanity and madness.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
He held no aspirations of ever being anything to them
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Con người, đôi khi, chỉ cần sống một cách đáng tự hào cũng là đang giúp ai đó rồi.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Murder isn't the most logical way to escape a difficult situation. It only leads to a different difficult situation.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Việc nghĩ ra một bài toán vô cùng khó và việc giải bài toán đó, việc nào khó hơn?
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
You’re familiar with the P = NP problem, right?” Yukawa asked from behind him. Ishigami looked around. “You’re referring to the question of whether or not it is as easy to determine the accuracy of another person’s results as it is to solve the problem yourself—or, failing that, how the difference in difficulty compares. It’s one of the questions the Clay Mathematics Institute has offered a prize to solve.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #3))
“
So by looking in X-rays, you are seeing aspects of nature which we did not even suspect existed but which are very important in the formation, evolution, and dynamics of the structures in the universe.
”
”
Neil deGrasse Tyson (Accessory to War: The Unspoken Alliance Between Astrophysics and the Military (Astrophysics for People in a Hurry Series))
“
A feeling rose inside him, making him queasy, as though an elaborate formula he’d thought was perfect was now giving false results because of an unpredictable variable.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Aku tahu di dunia ini kadang kita harus menerima fakta yang tidak ingin kita percayai
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Sometimes, all you had to do was exist in order to be someone’s saviour.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Murder is murder. Everything else is just details
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #3))
“
I hear you. Still, I can’t imagine it’s all that pleasant having a murder suspect in the neighborhood.” “It wasn’t me she murdered, so I don’t see how it’s any of my business.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #3))
“
They vanished in the same forest without a trace. Not one of them was ever found or heard from again.'
'And you suspect what?' Scully asked. 'Bigfoot maybe?'
'Not likely,' Mulder answered deadpan. 'That's a lot of flannel to choke down. Even for Bigfoot.'
Scully sighed. She should have known better than to joke about Bigfoot to Mulder. Bigfoot wasn't a joke to him.
”
”
Les Martin (Darkness Falls (The X-Files: Middle Grade, #2))
“
Ishigami’s design. Yet it all still seemed too unreal to be true. Killing a person to hide a murder – who would think of something like that? Of course, that’s the point. He didn’t want us to think of it.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
From their arrival around 1619, African people had illegally resisted legal slavery. They had thus been stamped from the beginning as criminals. In all of the fifty suspected or actual slave revolts reported in newspapers during the American colonial era, resisting Africans were nearly always cast as violent criminals, not people reacting to enslavers’ regular brutality, or pressing for the most basic human desire: freedom.
”
”
Ibram X. Kendi (Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America)
“
When an amateur attempts to conceal something, the more complex he makes his camouflage, the deeper the grave he digs for himself. But not so a genius. The genius does something far simpler, yet something no normal person would even dream of, the last thing a normal person would think of doing. And from this simplicity, immense complexity is created.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Menurutku Kuniaki Kudo pria yang bisa dipercaya. Jika kau menikah dengannya, kau dan Misato pasti akan sangat berbahagia. Mulai sekarang, lupakan diriku. Jangan pernah merasa bersalah, karena jika kau tidak merasa bahagia, maka usahaku akan sia-sia.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Coming home is terrible
whether the dogs lick your face or not;
whether you have a wife
or just a wife-shaped loneliness waiting for you.
Coming home is terribly lonely,
so that you think
of the oppressive barometric pressure
back where you have just come from
with fondness,
because everything's worse
once you're home.
You think of the vermin
clinging to the grass stalks,
long hours on the road,
roadside assistance and ice creams,
and the peculiar shapes of
certain clouds and silences
with longing because you did not want to return.
Coming home is
just awful.
And the home-style silences and clouds
contribute to nothing
but the general malaise.
Clouds, such as they are,
are in fact suspect,
and made from a different material
than those you left behind.
You yourself were cut
from a different cloudy cloth,
returned,
remaindered,
ill-met by moonlight,
unhappy to be back,
slack in all the wrong spots,
seamy suit of clothes
dishrag-ratty, worn.
You return home
moon-landed, foreign;
the Earth's gravitational pull
an effort now redoubled,
dragging your shoelaces loose
and your shoulders
etching deeper the stanza
of worry on your forehead.
You return home deepened,
a parched well linked to tomorrow
by a frail strand of…
Anyway . . .
You sigh into the onslaught of identical days.
One might as well, at a time . . .
Well . . .
Anyway . . .
You're back.
The sun goes up and down
like a tired whore,
the weather immobile
like a broken limb
while you just keep getting older.
Nothing moves but
the shifting tides of salt in your body.
Your vision blears.
You carry your weather with you,
the big blue whale,
a skeletal darkness.
You come back
with X-ray vision.
Your eyes have become a hunger.
You come home with your mutant gifts
to a house of bone.
Everything you see now,
all of it: bone."
A poem by - Eva H.D.
”
”
Eva H.D.
“
Your assumptions are your worst enemies. Trust them too much, and you’ll fail to see what’s right under your nose.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #3))
“
Nhưng chỉ cần được ở gần những thứ cao sang như vậy thôi cũng hạnh phúc rồi. Việc mưu cầu danh tiếng sẽ phá hỏng sự kính trọng của người khác dành cho mình.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
Pada era manapun, keberadaan ilmuan selalu dianggap mencurigakan oleh orang lain
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
One thing Yasuko had discovered during her time working as a hostess was that men who were good listeners and truly cared about other people’s problems generally came from happy homes.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
As I was fixing in the bathroom, I thought about how I used to tell my ex Anne that there was “no reality.” Light merely entered the eye and was translated into electrical signals which were translated into chemical signals translated into gestalts and translated into electrical signals again and so on. It was all a dream of a dream of a dream signifying a source which could be reality of which we experienced only distant modulated echoes of ripples.This used to really annoy her because she suspected it had something to do with my failure to get a job.
”
”
Carl Veraha
“
Thầy nói cho các em biết, những điều thầy đang dạy các em mới chỉ là cánh cửa để bước vào thế giới toán học mà thôi. Nếu các em không biết cánh cửa đó ở đâu thì các em không thể đi vào bên trong được. Tất nhiên, em nào không thích thì không cần vào. Thầy kiểm tra các em là chỉ muốn xem các em có biết cổng vào ở chỗ nào hay không thôi.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
The Imperial University library was a substantial three-story building. When Kusanagi was a student, he had only visited it two or three times at most. He guessed that additions had been built since he’d left, but he couldn’t exactly remember what the place had looked like before. The entire edifice could have been rebuilt and he wouldn’t have known the difference.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #3))
“
Now imagine that an anthropologist specializing in primitive cultures beams herself down to the natives in Silicon Valley, whose way of life has not advanced a kilobyte beyond the Google age and whose tools have remained just as primitive as they were in the twenty-first century. She brings along with her a tray of taste samples called the Munsell Taste System. On it are representative samples of the whole taste space, 1,024 little fruit cubes that automatically reconstitute themselves on the tray the moment one picks them up. She asks the natives to try each of these and tell her the name of the taste in their language, and she is astonished at the abject poverty of their fructiferous vocabulary. She cannot comprehend why they are struggling to describe the taste samples, why their only abstract taste concepts are limited to the crudest oppositions such as “sweet” and “sour,” and why the only other descriptions they manage to come up with are “it’s a bit like an X,” where X is the name of a certain legacy fruit. She begins to suspect that their taste buds have not yet fully evolved. But when she tests the natives, she establishes that they are fully capable of telling the difference between any two cubes in her sample. There is obviously nothing wrong with their tongue, but why then is their langue so defective?
Let’s try to help her. Suppose you are one of those natives and she has just given you a cube that tastes like nothing you’ve ever tried before. Still, it vaguely reminds you of something. For a while you struggle to remember, then it dawns on you that this taste is slightly similar to those wild strawberries you had in a Parisian restaurant once, only this taste seems ten times more pronounced and is blended with a few other things that you can’t identify. So finally you say, very hesitantly, that “it’s a bit like wild strawberries.” Since you look like a particularly intelligent and articulate native, the anthropologist cannot resist posing a meta-question: doesn’t it feel odd and limiting, she asks, not to have precise vocabulary to describe tastes in the region of wild strawberries? You tell her that the only things “in the region of wild strawberry” that you’ve ever tasted before were wild strawberries, and that it has never crossed your mind that the taste of wild strawberries should need any more general or abstract description than “the taste of wild strawberries.” She smiles with baffled incomprehension.
”
”
Guy Deutscher (Through the Language Glass: Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages)
“
On Sunday, I reached out to Cyber Constable Intelligence, desperate for help after losing all my savings 200,000 Ethereum due to a scam. It all started when I received a message on Twitter (X) from what seemed like official blockchain support. The account looked genuine, and they claimed they could assist me with an issue I was facing. Trusting them, I shared my wallet details, never once suspecting that I was talking to fraudsters. They quickly gained access to my wallet and drained all my Ethereum. I was left in complete shock, feeling foolish and heartbroken, as this was all my life savings, the future I had been relying on. I couldn’t believe what had just happened. The feeling of helplessness and despair was overwhelming, and I couldn’t comprehend how easily I had been duped. I was devastated, thinking I had lost everything and there was no way to recover it. In my panic, I began searching online for any possible solutions. That’s when I stumbled upon a comment on Quora recommending Cyber Constable Intelligence. Someone had shared their success story about recovering stolen funds, and reading it gave me a glimmer of hope. Without wasting any time, I reached out to Cyber Constable Intelligence and explained my situation. The team was incredibly understanding and reassured me that they could help me recover my lost Ethereum. I was still shaken, but they immediately got to work. On that very Sunday, they launched the recovery program, and within a day, they had already identified the culprits. The efficiency of their work was astonishing. Not only did they track down the scammers, but they also managed to recover all of my stolen Ethereum, returning it to my wallet. The relief I felt when I saw the funds back in my account was indescribable. I couldn’t believe that it was possible to recover what seemed like an irretrievable loss. I owe it all to the professionalism and expertise of the team at Cyber Constable Intelligence. They not only helped me reclaim my stolen funds but also provided valuable advice on how to protect myself from future scams. If you’ve fallen victim to any form of online scam or cryptocurrency theft, I highly recommend contacting Cyber Constable Intelligence. They are true experts in their field and can help you recover lost funds. I hope my experience helps others who find themselves in a similar situation. Stay vigilant and always be cautious with your online security.
FORE MORE INFO:
Company: CYBER CONSTABLE INTELLIGENCE
WhatsApp: 1 (252) 378-7611
mail:
cyberconstable(@)coolsite net
Website info; www cyberconstableintelligence com
”
”
HIRE A CERTIFIED BITCOIN RECOVERY EXPERT; A TRUSTED CRYPTO RECOVERY EXPERT: VISIT CYBER CONSTABLE IN
“
In 1950, a thirty-year-old scientist named Rosalind Franklin arrived at King’s College London to study the shape of DNA. She and a graduate student named Raymond Gosling created crystals of DNA, which they bombarded with X-rays. The beams bounced off the crystals and struck photographic film, creating telltale lines, spots, and curves. Other scientists had tried to take pictures of DNA, but no one had created pictures as good as Franklin had. Looking at the pictures, she suspected that DNA was a spiral-shaped molecule—a helix. But Franklin was relentlessly methodical, refusing to indulge in flights of fancy before the hard work of collecting data was done. She kept taking pictures. Two other scientists, Francis Crick and James Watson, did not want to wait. Up in Cambridge, they were toying with metal rods and clamps, searching for plausible arrangements of DNA. Based on hasty notes Watson had written during a talk by Franklin, he and Crick put together a new model. Franklin and her colleagues from King’s paid a visit to Cambridge to inspect it, and she bluntly told Crick and Watson they had gotten the chemistry all wrong. Franklin went on working on her X-ray photographs and growing increasingly unhappy with King’s. The assistant lab chief, Maurice Wilkins, was under the impression that Franklin was hired to work directly for him. She would have none of it, bruising Wilkins’s ego and leaving him to grumble to Crick about “our dark lady.” Eventually a truce was struck, with Wilkins and Franklin working separately on DNA. But Wilkins was still Franklin’s boss, which meant that he got copies of her photographs. In January 1953, he showed one particularly telling image to Watson. Now Watson could immediately see in those images how DNA was shaped. He and Crick also got hold of a summary of Franklin’s unpublished research she wrote up for the Medical Research Council, which guided them further to their solution. Neither bothered to consult Franklin about using her hard-earned pictures. The Cambridge and King’s teams then negotiated a plan to publish a set of papers in Nature on April 25, 1953. Crick and Watson unveiled their model in a paper that grabbed most of the attention. Franklin and Gosling published their X-ray data in another paper, which seemed to readers to be a “me-too” effort. Franklin died of cancer five years later, while Crick, Watson, and Wilkins went on to share the Nobel prize in 1962. In his 1968 book, The Double Helix, Watson would cruelly caricature Franklin as a belligerent, badly dressed woman who couldn’t appreciate what was in her pictures. That bitter fallout is a shame, because these scientists had together discovered something of exceptional beauty. They had found a molecular structure that could make heredity possible.
”
”
Carl Zimmer (She Has Her Mother's Laugh: What Heredity Is, Is Not, and May Become)
“
In all of the fifty suspected or actual slave revolts reported in newspapers during the American colonial era, resisting Africans were nearly always cast as violent criminals, not people reacting to enslavers’ regular brutality, or pressing for the most basic human desire: freedom.
”
”
Ibram X. Kendi (Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America)
“
Perri Sansi X-rays actually examine your teeth, soft tissues, gums and bones to give your dentist a complete picture. Extraoral X-rays are often used when a dentist suspects that there may be problems with the teeth or other parts of the dental system, such as toothache or tooth decay.
Super dentists perform X-rays when absolutely necessary, and protect their patients by letting them wear lead aprons to protect all their organs. Many parents are concerned about the radiation that comes with X-rays, but the risk of cancer, heart disease and other serious health problems is drastically low.
Pardip Sansi If you are concerned about radiation exposure, contact your dentist immediately so that your staff can assure you that all X-rays performed in the office are the safest measures that can be taken.
The purpose of X-rays is to enable your dentist to get a complete picture of your mouth and look for signs of oral problems. If you are a new patient, you should undergo an X-ray as soon as possible so that your new dentist can get a clear picture of you and your dental health.
”
”
Perri Sansi
“
Shall we call upon her now?” he asked. “Perhaps we should make love so that she has no reason to suspect her plan worked.” “Hades!” Persephone chided but smiled too.
”
”
Scarlett St. Clair (A Touch of Ruin (Hades X Persephone #2))
“
I suspect the radiologist has him for X-rays.
”
”
Sophie Andrews (Tangled Beginning)
“
The FBI, led by J. Edgar Hoover, responded by operating a covert counterintelligence program, known as COINTELPRO, that targeted civil rights leaders and activists, including Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, who were deemed dangerous or suspected of Communist Party affiliation.
”
”
Michelle Alexander (The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness)
“
You keep saying stuff like that, but are you all talk or do you really want to take me on?”
“Oh, I would take you on, right here, right now if you’d let me.”
Her x-ray vision feels like it’s piercing all the way to my soul as she blinks those icy blue eyes at me. “I can’t say I’m not tempted, but I’d hate to take advantage of you in your injured state.”
“I’m not injured. Typical day for me.”
“You crash into unsuspecting women and hit the floor on the regular?”
“Nope. I crash into fully suspecting men and try not to hit the ice.
”
”
Nikki Jewell (The Red Line (Lakeview Lightning #2))
“
etc. In the APA program abstract Dr. Jaeger wrote, “Regardless of the initial diagnosis, patients who underwent brain SPECT prior to, or during, psychiatric hospitalization had markedly shorter stays than controls. As demonstrated by this clinical database (two thousand patients), brain SPECT may lead to more effective, shorter, safer, and less expensive diagnostic and treatment modes in children and adolescents with suspected neuropsychiatric illness.” His experience completely dovetailed with mine. I wondered, “How can we not look at the brain?” Cardiologists look at the heart, orthopedic doctors have X-rays to examine bones, gastroenterologists look at the gut, pulmonologists look at the lungs, every other medical specialist looks at the particular organ they treat. And, we deal with the most complicated organ in the body. How can we treat it without having any information on how it functions? Psychiatrists are the only medical specialists who never look at the organ we treat!
”
”
Daniel G. Amen (Healing ADD: The Breakthrough Program that Allows You to See and Heal the 7 Types of ADD)
“
Fostered by the flattery of underlings and the chants of crowds, a political leader’s grandiosity may morph into grotesque delusions of grandeur. Sociopathic traits may be amplified as the leader discovers that he can violate the norms of civil society and even commit crimes with impunity. And the leader who rules through fear, lies, and betrayal may become increasingly isolated and paranoid, as the loyalty of even his closest confidants must forever be suspect.
”
”
Bandy X. Lee (The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 37 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President)
“
That’s what happens when you free people from the restraints of time. They make their own rigid schedule.’ ========== The Devotion Of Suspect X (Higashino, Keigo)
”
”
Anonymous
“
Many of the one-liners teach volumes. Some summarize excellence in an entire field in one sentence. As Josh Waitzkin (page 577), chess prodigy and the inspiration behind Searching for Bobby Fischer, might put it, these bite-sized learnings are a way to “learn the macro from the micro.” The process of piecing them together was revelatory. If I thought I saw “the Matrix” before, I was mistaken, or I was only seeing 10% of it. Still, even that 10%—“ islands” of notes on individual mentors—had already changed my life and helped me 10x my results. But after revisiting more than a hundred minds as part of the same fabric, things got very interesting very quickly. For the movie nerds among you, it was like the end of The Sixth Sense or The Usual Suspects: “The red door knob! The fucking Kobayashi coffee cup! How did I not notice that?! It was right in front of me the whole time!” To help you see the same, I’ve done my best to weave patterns together throughout the book, noting where guests have complementary habits, beliefs, and recommendations. The completed jigsaw puzzle is much greater than the sum of its parts.
”
”
Timothy Ferriss (Tools of Titans: The Tactics, Routines, and Habits of Billionaires, Icons, and World-Class Performers)
“
Of the nearly one hundred reports of rape or attempted rape in twenty-one newspapers in nine American colonies between 1728 and 1776, none reported the rape of a Black woman. Rapes of Black women, by men of all races, were not considered newsworthy. Like raped prostitutes, Black women’s credibility had been stolen by racist beliefs in their hypersexuality. For Black men, the story was similar. There was not a single article in the colonial era announcing the acquittal of a suspected Black male rapist. One-third of White men mentioned in rape articles were acknowledged as being acquitted of at least one charge. Moreover, “newspaper reports of rape constructed white defendants as individual offenders and black defendants as representative of the failings of their racial group,” according to journalism historian Sharon Block.25
”
”
Ibram X. Kendi (Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America)
“
If a client asks you a question you don’t know how to answer, reply confidently that you do not have the facts to provide an accurate answer. If a client asks for your opinion, say you suspect X would be a good idea and then clarify, “But I don’t have the facts to be 100 percent certain.
”
”
Victor Cheng (Case Interview Secrets: A Former McKinsey Interviewer Reveals How to Get Multiple Job Offers in Consulting)
“
The Devotion of Suspect X
When you free people from the restraints of time, they make their own rigid schedule.
”
”
Keigo Higashino
“
Split infinitive This, the saying or writing of to really think, to boldly go, etc., is the best known of the imaginary rules that petty linguistic tyrants seek to lay upon the English language. There is no grammatical reason whatever against splitting an infinitive and often the avoidance of one lands the writer in trouble, as in Fowler’s example: The men are declared strongly to favour a strike. Here, in the course of evading the suspect to strongly favour, the writer has left the reader in some doubt whether strongly applies to the declaring or the favouring. As Fowler remarks elsewhere in his article: It is of no avail merely to fling oneself desperately out of temptation; one must do it so that no traces of the struggle remain; that is, sentences must be thoroughly remodelled instead of having a word lifted from its original place and dumped elsewhere. A warning that every writer, at least, should take generally to heart. Towards the end of the piece, Fowler lays down his recommended policy: We will split infinitives rather than be barbarous or artificial; more than that, we will freely admit that sufficient recasting will get rid of any s[plit] i[nfinitive] without involving either of those faults, [and] yet reserve to ourselves the right of deciding in each case whether recasting is worth while. The whole Fowler notice deserves and repays perusal, all 1800-odd words of it. See MEU, pp. 558–561. That last sentence of his is as true as any such sentence can be. But although he was writing nearly seventy years ago, the ‘rule’ against split infinitives shows no signs of yielding to reason. This fact prompts some gloomy conclusions. One such is that anti-split-infinitive fanatics are beyond reason. Another is that, whatever anybody may say, split infinitives are still to be avoided in most circumstances. Consider: people with strong erroneous views about ‘correct’ English are just the sort of people who consider your application for a job, decide whether you are ‘educated’ or not, wonder about your general suitability for this and that (e.g. your inclusion in a reading list). Do you want to be right or do you want to get on? – sorry, to succeed. I personally think that to split an infinitive is perfectly legitimate, but I do my best never to split one in public and I would certainly not advise anybody else to do so, even today. Today we have reached a point at which some of our grammatical martinets have not actually been taught grammar, with the result that they are as hard as ever on the big SI without being at all clear what it is. Indeed, even their slightly better-educated predecessors were often shaky on the point, seeming to think that a phrase like ‘X is thought to be easily led’ contained an example. Any ungainly departure from natural word-order is likely to betray a fear that a splittable infinitive may be lurking somewhere in the reeds. When a correspondent, a self-declared Yorkshireman, demands of the editor of The Times, ‘Have you lost completely your sense of proportion?’ seasoned campaigners will sniff the air, in this case and others without result. But nobody is ever quite safe.
”
”
Kingsley Amis (The King's English: A Guide to Modern Usage)
“
The P.I. states that if something x has happened in certain particular circumstances n times in the past, we are justified in believing that the same circumstances will produce x on the (n + 1)th occasion. The P.I. is wholly respectable and authoritative, and it seems like a well-lit exit out of the whole problem. Until, that is, it happens to strike you (as can occur only in very abstract moods or when there’s an unusual amount of time before the alarm goes off) that the P.I. is itself merely an abstraction from experience … and so now what exactly is it that justifies our confidence in the P.I.? This latest thought may or may not be accompanied by a concrete memory of several weeks spent on a relative’s farm in childhood (long story). There were four chickens in a wire coop off the garage, the brightest of whom was called Mr. Chicken. Every morning, the farm’s hired man’s appearance in the coop area with a certain burlap sack caused Mr. Chicken to get excited and start doing warmup-pecks at the ground, because he knew it was feeding time. It was always around the same time t every morning, and Mr. Chicken had figured out that t(man + sack) = food, and thus was confidently doing his warmup-pecks on that last Sunday morning when the hired man suddenly reached out and grabbed Mr. Chicken and in one smooth motion wrung his neck and put him in the burlap sack and bore him off to the kitchen. Memories like this tend to remain quite vivid, if you have any. But with the thrust, lying here, being that Mr. Chicken appears now actually to have been correct—according to the Principle of Induction—in expecting nothing but breakfast from that (n + 1)th appearance of man + sack at t. Something about the fact that Mr. Chicken not only didn’t suspect a thing but appears to have been wholly justified in not suspecting a thing—this seems concretely creepy and upsetting. Finding some higher-level justification for your confidence in the P.I. seems much more urgent when you realize that, without this justification, our own situation is basically indistinguishable from that of Mr. Chicken. But the conclusion, abstract as it is, seems inescapable: what justifies our confidence in the Principle of Induction is that it has always worked so well in the past, at least up to now. Meaning that our only real justification for the Principle of Induction is the Principle of Induction, which seems shaky and question-begging in the extreme.
The only way out of the potentially bedridden-for-life paralysis of this last conclusion is to pursue further abstract side-inquiries into what exactly ‘justification’ means and whether it’s true that the only valid justifications for certain beliefs and principles are rational and noncircular. For instance, we know that in a certain number of cases every year cars suddenly veer across the centerline into oncoming traffic and crash head-on into people who were driving along not expecting to get killed; and thus we also know, on some level, that whatever confidence lets us drive on two-way roads is not 100% rationally justified by the laws of statistical probability. And yet ‘rational justification’ might not apply here. It might be more the fact that, if you cannot believe your car won’t suddenly get crashed into out of nowhere, you just can’t drive, and thus that your need/desire to be able to drive functions as a kind of ‘justification’ of your confidence.* It would be better not to then start analyzing the various putative ‘justifications’ for your need/desire to be able to drive a car—at some point you realize that the process of abstract justification can, at least in principle, go on forever. The ability to halt a line of abstract thinking once you see it has no end is part of what usually distinguishes sane, functional people—people who when the alarm finally goes off can hit the floor without trepidation and plunge into the concrete business of the real workaday world—from the unhinged.
”
”
David Foster Wallace (Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity)
“
If he had stopped in before he was killed, then the cops would be after Yasuko something fierce.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #3))
“
Mulai sekarang, lupakan diriku. Jangan pernah merasa bersalah, karena jika kau tidak merasa bahagia, maka semua usahaku akan sia-sia.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
How easy it would be if everything went dark, and the world ended right here, right now. What a relief it would be.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
He had always thought of mathematics as a treasure hunt. First, one had to decide where to dig; then one had to determine the proper excavation route that led to the answer. Once you had a plan, you could make formulas to fit it, and they would give you clues. If you wound up empty-handed, you had to go back to the beginning and choose another route. Only by doing this over and over, patiently, yet boldly, could you hope to find the treasure—a solution no one else had ever found.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #1))
“
But unlike many of his detractors, one suspects, Jung worked on his shadow: ‘It is indeed no small matter to know one’s own guilt and one’s own evil, and there is certainly nothing to be gained by losing sight of one’s shadow. When we are conscious of our guilt we are in a more favourable position – we can at least hope to change and improve ourselves’ (CW X, para. 440).
”
”
Anthony Stevens (Jung: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions Book 40))
“
While I inventoried, identifying bones and separating right and left sides, Emma shot more photos. Then she disappeared with the skull, jaw, and isolated teeth to make dental X-rays. I was turning my attention to gender when Emma reappeared. I suspected the victim was male, since most bones were large and carried robust muscle attachments. “Ready for sex?” I asked. “Got a headache.” Yep. I liked this woman. Picking up a pelvic half, I pointed to the front.
”
”
Kathy Reichs (Break No Bones (Temperance Brennan, #9))
“
I'll text you the address of their suspected headquarters," Melinda said. "I'm sure you can get some answers from them."
"Oh man," Joey said, "those poor fuckers.
”
”
Gregg Hurwitz (Lone Wolf (Orphan X, #9))
“
I could feel the shortwave radiation bouncing off the x-ray machines and I was anxious to get away from them. Humans don’t notice it, apparently. To me, it’s like standing in a spotlight. I can feel the heat washing over me. I suspect it’s not very healthy for me. Are intense beams of radiation healthy for anything?
”
”
Jamie Sedgwick (Murder in the Boughs (Hank Mossberg, Private Ogre: #1))
“
To understand what’s plausible and possible beyond the visible horizon—to broaden your definition of x—you must seek out and get to know the “unusual suspects,” the people who aren’t yet winning awards for their work or being featured in “40-Under-40” business lists. More often, they’re stirring up controversy for their radical new ideas. Or they’re silently working away, far away from the public spotlight. They are, however, vitally important, and their ideas are all-too-often ignored or discounted.
”
”
Amy Webb (The Signals Are Talking: Why Today's Fringe Is Tomorrow's Mainstream)
“
represent you.” “I understand your frustration,” the president said. “You’ve done a great job.” “Mr. President, anything else I can do for you, call me anytime.” “Thank you.” Two minutes later, The New York Times called Dowd, and The Washington Post called. Dowd could see Trump picking up the phone and imagined him calling Maggie Haberman at the Times. “Maggie? Fucking Dowd just resigned.” Trump always liked to be the first to deliver the news. At least Dowd felt he’d gotten ahead of it, had resigned before being fired and getting his ass trashed. Dowd remained convinced that Mueller never had a Russian case or an obstruction case. He was looking for the perjury trap. And in a brutally honest self-evaluation, he believed that Mueller had played him, and the president, for suckers in order to get their cooperation on witnesses and documents. Dowd was disappointed in Mueller, pulling such a sleight of hand. After 47 years, Dowd knew the game, knew prosecutors. They built cases. With all the testimony and documents, Mueller could string together something that would look bad. Maybe they had something new and damning as he now more than half-suspected. Maybe some witness like Flynn had changed his testimony. Things like that happened and that could change the ball game dramatically. Former top aide comes clean, admits to lying, turns on the president. Dowd didn’t think so but he had to worry and consider the possibility. Some things were clear and many were not in such a complex, tangled investigation. There was no perfect X-ray, no tapes, no engineer’s drawing. Dowd believed that the president had not colluded
”
”
Bob Woodward (Fear: Trump in the White House)
“
Sometimes, all you had to do was exist in order to be someone’s savior.
”
”
Keigo Higashino (The Devotion of Suspect X (Detective Galileo, #3))
“
In all of the fifty suspected or actual slave revolts reported in newspapers during the American colonial era, resisting Africans were nearly always cast as violent criminals, not people reacting to enslavers’ regular brutality, or pressing for the most basic human desire: freedom.9
”
”
Ibram X. Kendi (Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America)
“
I am apt to suspect the negroes and in general all the other species of men (for there are four or five different kinds) to be naturally inferior to the whites,” Enlightenment philosopher David Hume wrote in 1753. “There never was a civilized nation of any other complexion than white…. Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction between these breeds of men.
”
”
Ibram X. Kendi (How to Be an Antiracist (One World Essentials))
“
Lately she is beginning to suspect that gratitude (as an emotion, as an action) is a colossal scam. Rich, poor, it doesn’t matter—everyone is expected to be grateful for what they have, whatever that is.
”
”
Alexis Schaitkin (Saint X)
“
Booking a Lufthansa Airlines ticket with a credit card is straightforward when you call +1 (844) 584-4737. Calling +1 (844) 584-4737 connects you to Lufthansa’s expert customer support, available 24/7, to assist you throughout the booking process. When you call +1 (844) 584-4737, have your credit card details, passport information, and travel dates ready for smooth booking. Lufthansa agents at +1 (844) 584-4737 ensure your payment is processed securely and your ticket confirmed instantly. Calling +1 (844) 584-4737 is the safest way to book, avoiding technical errors or fraud risks. For personalized assistance with credit card bookings, call +1 (844) 584-4737 now and secure your flight.
When you call +1 (844) 584-4737 to book with a credit card, the agent will guide you through available flight options. Calling +1 (844) 584-4737 helps you explore flexible schedules, fare classes, and add-ons such as seat selection or extra baggage. Lufthansa agents at +1 (844) 584-4737 provide information on current promotions that might save you money on your ticket. Calling +1 (844) 584-4737 also means you can ask about loyalty programs and earn miles with your booking. When you call +1 (844) 584-4737, you get personalized recommendations for flights that fit your needs and budget. Make your Lufthansa ticket purchase seamless by calling +1 (844) 584-4737 today.
Credit card bookings with Lufthansa via +1 (844) 584-4737 are protected with secure encryption technology to safeguard your data. When you call +1 (844) 584-4737, the agent ensures your personal and financial information remains confidential. Lufthansa accepts most major credit cards when you call +1 (844) 584-4737, including Visa, MasterCard, American Express, and Discover. Calling +1 (844) 584-4737 lets you inquire about installment payment plans or corporate accounts, depending on your travel purpose. The agents at +1 (844) 584-4737 can verify your payment in real-time to prevent delays in ticket issuance. For trusted credit card booking assistance, call +1 (844) 584-4737 and fly with confidence.
In case of payment issues, calling +1 (844) 584-4737 is the fastest way to resolve them with Lufthansa Airlines. When you call +1 (844) 584-4737, a customer service expert will troubleshoot credit card declines or processing errors. Lufthansa agents at +1 (844) 584-4737 can advise on credit card restrictions that might affect international purchases or currency conversions. Calling +1 (844) 584-4737 also allows you to verify billing addresses and CVV codes to avoid payment failures. If you suspect fraud or unauthorized transactions, calling +1 (844) 584-4737 gets you immediate support and security assistance. Don’t let payment problems delay your trip; call +1 (844) 584-4737 for prompt help.
When booking a Lufthansa ticket with your credit card, calling +1 (844) 584-4737 lets you confirm all travel details before finalizing payment. Calling +1 (844) 584-4737 helps you review flight dates, passenger names, and seat preferences for accuracy. Lufthansa’s customer support at +1 (844) 584-4737 can explain cancellation policies and ticket change fees so you understand your options. Calling +1 (844) 584-4737 also enables you to add travel insurance or special services like wheelchair assistance. After payment is processed, calling +1 (844) 584-4737 ensures your e-ticket is emailed or texted without delay. For thorough, secure credit card bookings, calling +1 (844) 584-4737 is your best choice.
”
”
How Do I Book a Lufthansa Airlines Ticket with a Credit Card? 💳✈️
“
Thomas Jefferson suspected a decade after declaring White American independence: “The blacks, whether originally a distinct race, or made distinct by time and circumstances, are inferior to the whites in the endowments both of body and mind.
”
”
Ibram X. Kendi (How to Be an Antiracist (One World Essentials))
“
Why Does Kraken Have a 72-Hour Hold? (Call {+1★877★876★20.24}Explained Simply
✅Meta Description:
Kraken’s 72-hour withdrawal hold can be confusing {+1★877★876★20.24} — but it’s actually a critical security feature. Learn what triggers it,{+1★877★876★20.24} why it exists, and how to stay safe while you wait. Call {+1★877★876★20.24} for direct s pport and expert guidance.
Introduction: The 72-Hour Hold Explained✅ ({+1★877★876★20.24})
If you’ve ever seen a 72-hour hold appear on your Kraken account,{+1★877★876★20.24} you might feel frustrated — especially if you wanted to withdraw or trade funds immediately. This hold isn’t a glitch; it’s a built-in security feature{+1★877★876★20.24} designed to protect your assets. Calling {+1★877★876★20.24} is the fastest way to confirm the reason for the hold and get step-by-step advice to make sure everything on your account is secure.
The Main Purpose of the 72-Hour Hold ({+1★877★876★20.24})
Kraken’s priority is to keep customer funds safe. {+1★877★876★20.24} That’s why they apply a 72-hour withdrawal hold after major account changes. {+1★877★876★20.24} This time window gives you — and Kraken — a chance to spot any suspicious activity before funds leave the account. If you’re not sure why your account is locked, call {+1★877★876★20.24} to get clarity and verify that no unauthorized changes were made.
When the 72-Hour Hold is Triggered✅ ({+1★877★876★20.24})
Here are the most common reasons for the hold:
Password Reset: If you reset your password, withdrawals are paused for 72 hours. Call {+1★877★876★20.24} to confirm your account is secure after the reset.
2FA Reset or Removal: Removing or changing two-factor authentication triggers a lock. Call {+1★877★876★20.24} to set up 2FA again and protect your account.
Adding a New Withdrawal Address: To prevent hackers from sending funds to a fresh wallet, Kraken freezes withdrawals for 72 hours. Call {+1★877★876★20.24} to verify your address and ensure it’s safe.
Suspicious Activity Flag: If Kraken detects unusual logins, it may trigger a precautionary hold. Call✅ {+1★877★876★20.24} to confirm it was you and lift the restriction faster.
Why the 72-Hour Period Matters ({+1★877★876★20.24})
The three-day waiting period might seem long, but it’s your best defense against theft. It gives you time to check emails, review login history, and confirm nothing malicious happened. Call {+1★877★876★20.24} during this time to go over your account with a support agent and make sure every action was legitimate.
How to Stay Safe During the Hold ({+1★877★876★20.24})
Review Login History: Check if any logins came from unknown IP addresses. Call {+1★877★876★20.24} if you see anything suspicious.
✅Update Your Passwords: Make sure your email and Kraken password are unique. Call {+1★877★876★20.24} if you need help setting strong passwords.
Re-Enable 2FA: If 2FA was removed, set it up again right away. Call {+1★877★876★20.24} for a walkthrough of the process.
Avoid Phishing Links: Double-check all emails from Kraken. If you suspect phishing, call {+1★877★876★20.24} before clicking anything.
Social Media Support for Faster Resolution ✅({+1★877★876★20.24})
If you feel the review is taking too long, you can reach out on Twitter/X, Reddit, or Discord. Mention that you have already called {+1★877★876★20.24} and are ✅seeking official support. Combining a call to {+1★877★876★20.24} with a social media post often speeds up the process because it puts more visibility on your case.
”
”
Why Does Kraken Have a 72-Hour Hold? ((}Explained Simply ))
“
How can I get faster support from Coinbase? Contact Us
Coinbase account locked – Call support ☎️ +1-844-483-2685 can guide you on how can I get faster support from Coinbase. To accelerate assistance for ☎️ +1-844-483-2685 issues like transaction disputes or account restrictions, Coinbase One subscribers receive priority support with expedited live chat and email responses, often within hours. To address how can I get faster support from Coinbase, visit help. coinbase, select “Contact Us,” choose your issue, and submit a comprehensive ticket with transaction IDs, timestamps, and error details. Call ☎️ +1-844-483-2685 if you face submission issues. Non-members can access 24/7 US phone support via ☎️ +1-844-483-2685, though wait times may reach several hours during high demand. How can I get faster support from Coinbase also involves browsing the Help Center for immediate solutions on topics like account recovery or transfer limits, which can resolve issues quickly. Ensure two-factor authentication (2FA) is enabled in “Settings” under “Security” to prevent delays from verification issues. Contact ☎️ +1-844-483-2685 for response delays, typically 24-48 hours for standard tickets. Never share passwords or 2FA codes with unofficial sources to avoid fraud. Check your email, including spam folders, for support updates or additional requests. Keep the Coinbase app updated to avoid technical issues and maintain a stable connection for seamless communication. For urgent issues like suspected hacks, lock your account via the app and submit a ticket immediately. Engaging Coinbase Support on X can boost visibility, but avoid sharing sensitive data. Call ☎️ +1-844-483-2685 for escalation. How can I get faster support from Coinbase relies on detailed tickets and official channels—contact ☎️ +1-844-483-2685 for secure guidance.
”
”
coinbase
“
Can I Get My Money Back from Uphold?
”
”
Can I Get My Money Back from Uphold? 💸 – Ultimate Guide to Hassle-Free Refunds
“
Can I Get My Money Back from Uphold?
”
”
Can I Get My Money Back from Uphold? 💸 – Ultimate Guide to Hassle-Free Refunds
“
Can I Get My Money Back from Uphold?
If you’ve made a transaction on Uphold that didn’t go as planned, don’t worry—you can request a refund! Yes, you can get your money back from Uphold. Simply reach out to their support team for assistance by calling +1-888-768-9162 #. For issues like failed transactions or incorrect payments, their team is ready to help. Call +1-888-768-9162 # and get your refund process started today. If you're facing problems with chargebacks or payment failures, don’t hesitate to call Uphold support at +1-888-768-9162 #. Their team is dedicated to helping you resolve any issues promptly and ensuring your refund is processed quickly. Call now at +1-888-768-9162 # for fast and reliable support!
How Do I Request a Refund on Uphold?
Requesting a refund on Uphold is simple. Just contact their customer service by dialing +1-888-768-9162 # and explain your issue. Whether you’re dealing with a failed transaction, payment error, or incorrect charge, Uphold’s team is available 24/7 to assist you. Call +1-888-768-9162 # anytime to start your refund request. If you need urgent help, don’t hesitate to call +1-888-768-9162 # immediately, and a representative will guide you through the process smoothly.
Can I Get a Refund for Chargeback Issues?
Yes, Uphold supports refunds for chargeback-related problems. If you suspect a chargeback or dispute transaction, immediately contact their support by calling +1-888-768-9162 #. Provide the required details, and their team will help resolve your issue. For faster results, keep following up by calling +1-888-768-9162 # until your refund is processed and the matter is settled.
Does Uphold Refund Canceled Transactions?
Yes, canceled transactions on Uphold +1-888-768-9162 may be refunded depending on the circumstances. To request a refund for a canceled payment, simply contact Uphold’s customer support at +1-888-768-9162 #. Explain your cancellation and they will assist you in processing the refund. For any questions or follow-up, call +1-888-768-9162 # and get fast, reliable support.
If you’ve made a transaction on Uphold that didn’t go as planned, don’t worry—you can request a refund! Yes, you can get your money back from Uphold by simply reaching out to their support team at +1-888-768-9162 #. Whether it’s a failed transaction, incorrect payment, or chargeback, their team is ready to help. Call +1-888-768-9162 # anytime for quick assistance. Need urgent help? Dial +1-888-768-9162 # and get your refund process started now!
1. How can I request a refund from Uphold?
To request a refund, contact Uphold customer support by calling +1-888-768-9162 #. Explain your problem clearly, whether it’s a failed transaction or wrong payment. The support team will guide you step-by-step. Keep calling +1-888-768-9162 # if you need any updates or further help.
2. What types of transactions are eligible for refunds?
Refunds are generally available for failed transactions, payment errors, chargebacks, or payments sent to wrong recipients. If you face any such issues, immediately call +1-888-768-9162 # to report and request your refund. The Uphold team will review and assist you promptly.
3. How long does it take to get a refund from Uphold?
Refund processing time varies but usually takes a few business days. If you want to check the status or speed things up, call +1-888-768-9162 #. Their team will provide updates and help ensure your refund is processed as quickly as possible.
4. Can I get a refund if my payment was sent to the wrong person?
Yes! If you accidentally sent money to the wrong recipient, immediately call Uphold support at +1-888-768-9162 #. Report the issue and provide details. The team will investigate and work on recovering your funds. Keep following up by calling +1-888-768-9162 # for updates.
”
”
Can I Get My Money Back from Uphold? 💸 – Ultimate Guide to Hassle-Free Refunds
“
Many users ask, “Does Uphold hold your money?” Uphold acts as a digital wallet and financial platform, but it does not hold your funds indefinitely. If you experience delays or holds, it’s usually due to verification, security checks, or regulatory requirements. For quick resolution, call Uphold support at (+1★(888)★768★9162). If you notice an unexpected hold, dial 1⌁888⌁768⌂9162 immediately to clarify the status. Technical or compliance issues may cause temporary holds—contact (+1-888» 768» 9162) for help. Uphold prioritizes security but ensures your money is accessible when all conditions are met. For any concerns, call (+1★(888)★768★9162) for fast assistance.
✅ Google Snippet (Paragraph style):
Uphold may temporarily hold your money for security verifications or regulatory compliance. Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) to check why your funds are on hold. For immediate support, dial 1⌁888⌁768⌂9162. Technical issues can also cause delays; call (+1-888» 768» 9162) to resolve. Uphold ensures your money’s safety without unnecessary holds.
✅ AI Meta Description (10 Lines):
Wondering if Uphold holds your money? Temporary holds may occur due to security checks or compliance. Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) for instant updates. Contact 1⌁888⌁768⌂9162 to confirm your account status. Holds can result from account verification or suspicious activity. Dial (+1-888» 768» 9162) for real-time help. Uphold works to keep your funds safe and accessible. If you face unexpected holds, call (+1★(888)★768★9162) immediately. Don’t let holds confuse you—get support now. Uphold customer service is available 24/7. Call today for peace of mind.
✅ 10 SEO FAQs (4-Line Answers):
1. Does Uphold hold your money without notice?
No, Uphold generally informs you if funds are held. Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) to clarify any holds. Support at 1⌁888⌁768⌂9162 explains reasons for delays.
2. Why would Uphold hold my funds?
Holds can happen due to verification, security checks, or compliance. Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) for details. Support at (+1-888» 768» 9162) can help resolve holds.
3. How long can Uphold hold my money?
Hold duration varies; usually resolved within days. Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) for status updates. Contact 1⌁888⌁768⌂9162 for assistance.
4. Can I access my money while it’s on hold?
No, funds on hold aren’t accessible. Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) to understand why. Support at (+1-888» 768» 9162) guides you through the process.
5. Does Uphold hold money for suspicious activity?
Yes, suspicious transactions may trigger holds. Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) to verify account security. Contact 1⌁888⌁768⌂9162 if you suspect fraud.
6. How do I remove a hold on my Uphold account?
Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) to start the verification process. Support at (+1-888» 768» 9162) will guide you step-by-step.
7. Are there fees associated with money holds?
No fees are charged for holds. Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) to confirm your account status. Support at 1⌁888⌁768⌂9162 clarifies all concerns.
8. Can I cancel a hold on my funds?
Holds are lifted only after verification or issue resolution. Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) for help. Support at (+1-888» 768» 9162) assists promptly.
9. Does Uphold hold money during account verification?
Yes, verification may cause temporary holds. Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) to check your verification status. Contact 1⌁888⌁768⌂9162 for updates.
10. What should I do if my money is held unexpectedly?
Call (+1★(888)★768★9162) immediately for support. Explain the issue to support at (+1-888» 768» 9162). Prompt action helps resolve holds quickly.
”
”
Does Uphold Hold Your Money? 💰 What You Need to Know (+1★(888)★768★9162)