Rwa Quotes

Starting with Theodor Adorno in the 1950s, people have suggested that lower intelligence predicts adherence to conservative ideology. Some but not all studies since then have supported this conclusion. More consistent has been a link between lower intelligence and a subtype of conservatism, namely right-wing authoritarianism (RWA, a fondness for hierarchy). One particularly thorough demonstration of this involved more than fifteen thousand subjects in the UK and United States; importantly, the links among low IQ, RWA, and intergroup prejudice were there after controlling for education and socioeconomic status. The standard, convincing explanation for the link is that RWA provides simple answers, ideal for people with poor abstract reasoning skills.

The standard, convincing explanation for the link is that RWA provides simple answers, ideal for people with poor abstract reasoning skills.

His deep voice drifted to her through the crowd of women. “…my lady when she returns. Och, there ye are, Blossom,” Faolán grinned, standing up and taking her hand so she could ease back into the restaurant booth. “These lasses were just asking if I was a stripper. I told them I doona think so,” he said, his face clouded with uncertainty. “I’m not, am I?” The inquisitive lasses in question flushed scarlet and scattered to the four corners of the room at the murderous look on Colleen’s face. “No, you’re not, but I guess I can see how they’d think that,” she muttered darkly. “What you are is a freaking estrogen magnet.

Refusing to lean back against him, Colleen sat ramrod straight until they reached the road. “I guess I should say thank you for saving my life,” she muttered then turned and slapped Faolán hard across the face. “And that’s for you having to save it in the first place. And I’m not your woman, you big, arrogant, lying, betraying…faery loving…” She searched for the perfect insult and couldn’t find one, “…Scot.” She gave a very unladylike snort. “Happy now? That fiery enough for you?

Starting with Theodor Adorno in the 1950s, people have suggested that lower intelligence predicts adherence to conservative ideology. Some but not all studies since then have supported this conclusion. More consistent has been a link between lower intelligence and a subtype of conservatism, namely right-wing authoritarianism (RWA, a fondness for hierarchy). ... The standard, convincing explanation for the link is that RWA provides simple answers, ideal for people with poor abstract reasoning skills. The literature has two broad themes. One is that rightists are relatively uncomfortable with ambiguity; ... . The other is that leftists, well, think harder, have a greater capacity for what the political scientist Philip Tetlock of the University of Pennsylvania calls "integrative complexity". In one study, conservatives and liberals, when asked about the causes of poverty, both tended toward personal attributions (“They’re poor because they’re lazy”). But only if they had to make snap judgments. Give people more time, and liberals shifted toward situational explanations (“Wait, things are stacked against the poor”). In other words, conservatives start gut and stay gut; liberals go from gut to head. ... Why? Some have suggested it’s a greater respect for thinking, which readily becomes an unhelpful tautology. Linda Skitka of the University of Illinois emphasizes how the personal attributions of snap judgments readily feel dissonant to liberals, at odds with their principles; thus they are motivated to think their way to a more consonant view. In contrast, even with more time, conservatives don’t become more situational, because there’s no dissonance.

INTELLIGENCE Oh, what the hell? Let’s begin with something inflammatory. Starting with Theodor Adorno in the 1950s, people have suggested that lower intelligence predicts adherence to conservative ideology.33 Some but not all studies since then have supported this conclusion. More consistent has been a link between lower intelligence and a subtype of conservatism, namely right-wing authoritarianism (RWA, a fondness for hierarchy). One particularly thorough demonstration of this involved more than fifteen thousand subjects in the UK and United States; importantly, the links among low IQ, RWA, and intergroup prejudice were there after controlling for education and socioeconomic status. The standard, convincing explanation for the link is that RWA provides simple answers, ideal for people with poor abstract reasoning skills. INTELLECTUAL

Housing associations must view accessibility not as an optional feature, but as an essential obligation to ensure that persons with disabilities have equal opportunities in every aspect of life in the community.

Golden Heart finalist in the prestigious RWA writing contest. Finalist in the International Digital Awards Semi-finalist in the Best Indie Books of 2012. A featured

When predicting homosexual prejudice from fundamentalism and the full RWA scale, both predictors have positive beta weights (each is associated with increasing homosexual prejudice), but fundamentalism is the weaker predictor (.19 vs. 43

Но это не значит, что если с абсолютной точки зрения присущая природа всех дхарм отсутствует, то с относительной познание йогинов или же познание обычных людей не допускается. И, как сказано в «Сутре изложения двух истин»: Хотя с точки зрения абсолютного вещи не существует, с точки зрения относительного осуществляют практику пути. Ведь иначе, откуда берется разделение (bye brag, vyavasthā) между шраваками, пратьекабуддами, бодхисаттвами, обычными людьми и прочими? То, причина чего не существует относительно, не зарождается даже на относительном уровне, подобно рогам зайца (ri bon gi rwa, śaśavisānā) и прочему. Но то, причина чего существует, хоть она и обманчивая (brdzun pa, alīka) в абсолютном смысле, зарождается подобно иллюзиям (sgyu ma, māyā), отражениям (gzugs brnyan, pratibimba) и прочему. [56] И хотя на относительном уровне иллюзии и прочее возникают во взаимной зависимости (rten cing ‘brel bar ‘byung ba, pratityasamutpāda), на абсолютном уровне их реальность (dngos po yod pa, vastutva) невозможна, поскольку она не выдерживает анализа (brtag mi bzod pa, vicārāksama). Поэтому говорится, что весь мир подобен иллюзии. Таким образом, так же, как для всех живых существ иллюзия рождения возникает в результате иллюзии беспокойств и действий (кармы), для йогинов иллюзия йогического знания (rnal ‘byor pa’i ye shes, yogijñāna) возникает в результате иллюзии накопления заслуги и знания. Как сказано в «Сутре совершенства мудрости»: О Субхути! Все дхармы призрачны (sprul pa, nirmita). Что-то является призрачностью пратьекабудд. Что-то является призрачностью бодхисаттв. Что-то является призрачностью татхагат. Что-то явлется призрачностью действий. Что-то является призрачностью беспокойств. Благодаря этому перечислению, Субхути, Все дхармы узнаются как призрачные. Таково различие между йогинами и обычными людьми: Одни подобны магам-иллюзионистам (sgyu ma mkhan, māyākāra), которые, зная иллюзию как есть, не цепляются за нее как за истинную. Именно поэтому их называют йогинами. Те же, кто подобно детям и в силу их привязанности к ошибочному принимают фокусы за реальность, называются «детьми». [57] Поэтому здесь нет никаких противоречий (‘gal ba, viruddha).

For Marie Force, who reached out to me in 2011 when I lost my newspaper job and encouraged me to self-publish — and then showed me how. From notes on a napkin at RWA13 to reality, here is the book we talked about. Thanks for everything.

Why are high RWAs extra-punitive against law-breakers? For one thing, they think the crimes involved are more serious than most people do, and they believe more in the beneficial effects of punishment. But they also find “common criminals” highly repulsive and disgusting, and they admit it feels personally good, it makes them glad, to be able to punish a perpetrator. They get off smiting the sinner; they relish being “the arm of the Lord.” Similarly, high RWA university students say that classmates in high school who misbehaved and got into trouble, experienced “bad trips” on drugs, became pregnant, and so on “got exactly what they deserved” and that they felt a secret pleasure when they found out about the others’ misfortune.

Is Phantom Wallet legal in the US? It is legal to use Phantom Wallet in the US, and as of call at [+1-833-611-5103] late 2025, one of the most exciting and legally complex frontiers is the call at [+1-833-611-5103] tokenization of Real World Assets (RWAs). Protocols are emerging that allow users to call at [+1-833-611-5103] gain exposure to assets like tokenized real estate, private credit, or US call at [+1-833-611-5103] T-Bills, all accessible through a DeFi wallet, which is a new development call at [+1-833-611-5103] for users. While this represents a powerful innovation, it places users directly at the intersection call at [+1-833-611-5103] of DeFi and traditional securities law. Almost without exception, tokens that represent a call at [+1-833-611-5103] fractionalized interest in a real-world, income-producing asset will be considered securities by the call at [+1-833-611-5103] SEC. This means that both the protocols offering them and the users call at [+1-833-611-5103] interacting with them are subject to a much higher level of legal call at [+1-833-611-5103] scrutiny. To operate legally, these RWA protocols must often restrict access to verified accredited call at [+1-833-611-5103] investors and implement robust KYC/AML procedures, even if the interaction happens through call at [+1-833-611-5103] a decentralized wallet like Phantom. A US user who finds a way to call at [+1-833-611-5103] circumvent these restrictions to invest in a tokenized real estate project would be call at [+1-833-611-5103] taking on a significant legal risk and could be participating in an unregistered call at [+1-833-611-5103] securities offering.