Reservation System In India Quotes

Respect for all, reward for the worthy, reservation for none.

But there was a lacuna in Nehru’s concept of science: he saw it exclusively in terms of laboratory science, not field science; physics and molecular biology, not ecology, botany, or agronomy. He understood that India’s farmers were poor in part because they were unproductive—they harvested much less grain per acre than farmers elsewhere in the world. But unlike Borlaug, Nehru and his ministers believed that the poor harvests were due not to lack of technology—artificial fertilizer, irrigated water, and high-yield seeds—but to social factors like inefficient management, misallocation of land, lack of education, rigid application of the caste system, and financial speculation (large property owners were supposedly hoarding their wheat and rice until they could get better prices). This was not crazy: more than one out of five families in rural India owned no land at all, and about two out of five owned less than 2.5 acres, not enough land to feed themselves. Meanwhile, a tiny proportion of absentee landowners controlled huge swathes of terrain. The solution to rural poverty, Nehru therefore believed, was less new technology than new policies: give land from big landowners to ordinary farmers, free the latter from the burdens of caste, and then gather the liberated smallholders into more-efficient, technician-advised cooperatives. This set of ideas had the side benefit of fitting nicely into Nehru’s industrial policy: enacting them would cost next to nothing, reserving more money for building factories.

From: Bernadette Fox To: Manjula Kapoor Oh! Could you make dinner reservations for us on Thanksgiving? You can call up the Washington Athletic Club and get us something for 7 PM for three. You are able to place calls, aren’t you? Of course, what am I thinking? That’s all you people do now. I recognize it’s slightly odd to ask you to call from India to make a reservation for a place I can see out my window, but here’s the thing: there’s always this one guy who answers the phone, “Washington Athletic Club, how may I direct your call?” And he always says it in this friendly, flat… Canadian way. One of the main reasons I don’t like leaving the house is because I might find myself face-to-face with a Canadian. Seattle is crawling with them. You probably think, U.S./Canada, they’re interchangeable because they’re both filled with English-speaking, morbidly obese white people. Well, Manjula, you couldn’t be more mistaken. Americans are pushy, obnoxious, neurotic, crass—anything and everything—the full catastrophe as our friend Zorba might say. Canadians are none of that. The way you might fear a cow sitting down in the middle of the street during rush hour, that’s how I fear Canadians. To Canadians, everyone is equal. Joni Mitchell is interchangeable with a secretary at open-mic night. Frank Gehry is no greater than a hack pumping out McMansions on AutoCAD. John Candy is no funnier than Uncle Lou when he gets a couple of beers in him. No wonder the only Canadians anyone’s ever heard of are the ones who have gotten the hell out. Anyone with talent who stayed would be flattened under an avalanche of equality. The thing Canadians don’t understand is that some people are extraordinary and should be treated as such. Yes, I’m done. If the WAC can’t take us, which may be the case, because Thanksgiving is only two days away, you can find someplace else on the magical Internet. * I was wondering how we ended up at Daniel’s Broiler for Thanksgiving dinner. That morning, I slept late and came downstairs in my pajamas. I knew it was going to rain because on my way to the kitchen I passed a patchwork of plastic bags and towels. It was a system Mom had invented for when the house leaks.

Today when we speak with concern about our little languages—more as relics than as living systems that could challenge our smooth-running world, just as we wish the tigers tamely alive but far away on their reserves, not prowling our city streets—the name of the game is inclusion. Large numbers of people outside the system are a threat to order. So we fantasize about the poor keeping our little languages warm for us, on their ‘tiger reserves’, and we sustain the illusion that we have not changed, while the mega-system pushes everyone, even these poor people, towards connectivity in English.

In February 2017, the Institute of International Finance reported that capital flows to emerging markets remained flat, at around US$680 billion, with high downside risks for FDI. Financial market expectations for interest rate hikes in the United States are a contributing factor to weakness in capital flows destined for the emerging markets, as investors look to gain from higher-interest-rate environments. However, the anemic economic growth conditions across the developing world also lower the opportunity for returns and hurt capital inflows. The softness in capital flows to emerging economies could prove more damaging in the long term as the prospects for economic growth continue to wane. Already the world’s largest and most strategically vital emerging nations—such as Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, India, Indonesia, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey—are only growing at 3 percent or less a year. Ever more damning is the implication of the IMF’s October 2014 “World Economic Outlook” that the world will never again see the rates of growth witnessed prior to 2007.12 This weak economic backdrop comports with a weak capital inflow story. According to the Reserve Bank of Australia, the movement of money through the financial system has been stagnant over the past decade. In dollar terms, cross-border capital inflows among the G20 economies have fallen nearly 70 percent since mid-2007.13 Ultimately, slow economic growth leads to decreased investment, which in turns leads to even slower growth.

Part 2 - Now the problem is India is with multiple cultures, context specific reasons and languages - so protecting value of India means protecting each and every cultural values in India, but when these people turn arrogant their values getting down, that is the problem, you have to withstand the pain to show you are capable, if you are capable then the culture you belong is also capable - this is applicable for anyone, and once your character and your cultural identities are analyzed you will be easily estimated to be fit for something. But in my case, it is totally complicated, First I am Ganapathy K (Son of Krishnamoorthy not Shiv), that born on 14- April 1992 (Approximate Birth day of Lord Rama and Tamil New year and Dr Ambedkar birthday), My family name is Somavarapu (Which means clans of Chandra - Or Monday - Or cold place) My family origin is from Tenali - Guntur, but permanently settled in TN, born in agricultural family (Kamma Naidu (General caste in AP and Telangana) but Identified as Vadugan Naidu (OBC) for reservation benefits as OBC Non Creamy - as made by my ancestors - I did not make this. And Manu smiriti varna system did not take place in south India much like UP or Rajasthan even in ancient times. Even in ancient times, north rulers did not rule south india at all, rather they made friendship sometimes or they made leaders for south people by selecting best fit model. So whomever are said to be kshatriyas in South are Pseudo Kshatriyas or deemed Kshatriyas which means there are no real Kshatriyas in South India - and it was not required much in south. tribal people and indigenous people in south were very strong in ancient time, that they prayed and worshiped only forest based idolizers. they do not even know these Hindustani or Sanskrit things, and Tamil was started from Sangam literature (As per records - And when sangam literature was happening - Lord shiva and Lord Karthikeya was present on the hall - As mentioned on Tholkappiam ) - So ethically Tamil also becomes somehow language of God, Krishnadevraya once said Telugu was given by Lord shiva. And Kannada is kind of poetic language which is mixture of Dravidian style languages with some sanskrit touch and has remarkable historical significance from Ramayana period. My caste (Kamma) as doing agriculture work was regarded as upper sudra by British people but since they knew sanskrit, they were taking warrior roles ( Rudramadevi, munsuri naidu clan, pemmasani clan, kandi nayaka (Srilanka clan ) As Kamma also has interactions with Kapu, Balija, Velama, Telaga and Reddy clans - they were considered as land lords/Zamindari system - later in some places given chowdary and Rao title too. And my intellactual property in Bio sciences and my great granpa wrtings, my family knowledge which includes (Vattelzhuthu - Tamil + Malayalam mixture) sanskrit notes about medicinal plants in western ghats which my great grandpa wrote, my previous incarnation in Rajput family and European family.

How do I ask a question at Air India?| How do I ask a question at Air India – You can call Air India reservations[1-833-770-3304] to ask a question directly and receive professional assistance. For general inquiries, you can also contact Air India ticket assistance[1-833-770-3304] to clarify flight schedules, booking options, or baggage policies. Speaking with Air India booking support[1-833-770-3304] ensures that your questions are addressed quickly and accurately, avoiding the frustration of automated systems.

Where & How to Buy Verified PayPal Accounts: Country-wise Rules — What’s Legal ➥➥If you want to more information just contact now. ➥➥ 24 Hours Reply/Contact ➥➤ WhatsApp:+1(272)4173584 ➥➤ Telegram:@seo2smm0 ➥➤Email: supportseo2smm@gmail.com Executive summary Buying or selling someone else’s verified payment account contradicts the trust model of modern payments. Payment providers bind identity to accounts to prevent fraud, money-laundering, and financial crime; circumventing that binding is a red flag in nearly every jurisdiction. Across major markets—North America, the European Union, the United Kingdom, India, the Gulf, and parts of Africa—anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) rules tighten the legal exposure of anyone who transacts through accounts divorced from their legitimate owner. Platforms like PayPal expressly forbid transferring or selling accounts without prior, documented consent and often reserve the right to freeze or reclaim accounts that appear misused. (PayPal) This article explains why that is so, outlines the statutory and platform reasons why buying accounts is dangerous or illegal country by country, and offers lawful alternatives for achieving verified payment capability. The universal baseline: platforms, KYC and AML Before diving into national differences, note two nearly universal rules: Payment platforms’ user agreements bind an account to a named individual or legal entity; transfers or sales typically breach those agreements. PayPal’s user contract is explicit about account control and residency requirements and empowers the company to take corrective action. (PayPal) National AML/KYC frameworks require financial service providers (and many fintechs) to identify and verify beneficial owners and to report suspicious activity. These regulatory frameworks mean that accounts without proper, traceable ownership are likely to trigger investigations, freezes, and legal exposure for people who use them knowingly or unknowingly. (FinCEN.gov) Taken together, platform rules plus public law make the market for bought accounts risky, fragile, and often unlawful. United States — strict enforcement and criminal exposure In the U.S., AML obligations derive from statutes such as the Bank Secrecy Act and are enforced by agencies including FinCEN and federal prosecutors. Firms that fail to comply with registration and reporting requirements face civil fines and criminal penalties; individuals implicated in schemes to obscure beneficial ownership or to traffic in payment credentials can face prosecution. The regulatory apparatus also supports vigorous private enforcement and platform-level security measures. (FinCEN.gov) Practical implication: purchasing a verified PayPal account in order to receive or move funds risks account reclamation, frozen funds, suspicious activity reports, civil suits, and potentially criminal exposure—particularly where the account was verified with fraudulent or stolen documents. Safe alternatives in the U.S.: complete platform KYC; set up an LLC or corporation and open a business payment account; use authorized merchant services or payment facilitators; consult a payments-law attorney. United Kingdom — FCA oversight and money-laundering rules The UK’s regulatory framework emphasizes due diligence and risk-based controls for payment and e-money services. Firms must comply with the Money Laundering Regulations and are supervised by the FCA and other bodies. Regulators also scrutinize financial exclusion practices, but that does not mean bypassing KYC is legal—rather, it signals that authorities want firms to find compliant ways to serve legitimate but underserved customers. (FCA) Practical implication: buying an account sidesteps those safeguards and may expose both buyer and seller to regulatory action. Because the FCA focuses on systemic integrity,

The Classic Question: The Paradox of The Majority or Bahujen. The term Bahujan refers to India’s demographic majority—Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes—constituting nearly 70% of the population. Yet this numerical strength has not translated into structural empowerment, giving rise to what scholars call the Bahujan paradox: the tension between political visibility and persistent social marginality. Historically, caste society imposed graded inequality (Ambedkar), ensuring that even among oppressed groups, internal hierarchies prevented unity. Despite the promise of democracy, land ownership, wealth, education, and cultural capital remain concentrated in upper-caste hands. This creates the first axis of the paradox: majority in numbers, minority in power. The second dimension lies in politics versus structure. From the 1980s, the rise of the BSP, SP, RJD, DMK, and others marked a political awakening. Bahujan leaders captured state power in several regions, but institutions like the bureaucracy, judiciary, and media remained dominated by elites. Electoral success has thus not dismantled systemic dominance. Third is the tension between unity and fragmentation. Kanshi Ram envisioned solidarity across SCs, STs, and OBCs, yet rivalries and caste sub-identities often splinter this bloc, weakening collective bargaining. Fourth, policy gains contrast with social realities. Reservations and welfare have created upward mobility for a small segment, but caste violence, everyday discrimination, and failed land reforms persist. Finally, there is empowerment without emancipation. Leaders once rooted in radical anti-caste thought often compromise with dominant caste and capitalist frameworks. Cultural icons like Ambedkar and Phule are celebrated, but frequently co-opted by parties unwilling to confront caste hierarchies. In essence, the Bahujan paradox reveals a striking contradiction: India’s majority commands votes but not full dignity, wielding political clout without achieving structural transformation.