Practical Vs Emotional Quotes

Mandal vs Mandir The V.P. Singh government was the biggest casualty of this confrontation. Within the BJP and its mentor, the RSS, the debate on whether or not to oppose V.P. Singh and OBC reservations reached a high pitch. Inder Malhotra | 981 words It was a blunder on V.P. Singh’s part to announce his acceptance of the Mandal Commission’s report recommending 27 per cent reservations in government jobs for what are called Other Backward Classes but are, in fact, specified castes — economically well-off, politically powerful but socially and educationally backward — in such hot haste. He knew that the issue was highly controversial, deeply emotive and potentially explosive, which it proved to be instantly. But his top priority was to outsmart his former deputy and present adversary, Devi Lal. He even annoyed those whose support “from outside” was sustaining him in power. BJP leaders were peeved that they were informed of what was afoot practically at the last minute in a terse telephone call. What annoyed them even more was that the prime minister’s decision would divide Hindu society. The BJP’s ranks demanded that the plug be pulled on V.P. Singh but the top leadership advised restraint, because it was also important to keep the Congress out of power. The party leadership was aware of the electoral clout of the OBCs, who added up to 52 per cent of the population. As for Rajiv Gandhi, he was totally and vehemently opposed to the Mandal Commission and its report. He eloquently condemned V.P. Singh’s decision when it was eventually discussed in Parliament. This can be better understood in the perspective of the Mandal Commission’s history. Having acquired wealth during the Green Revolution and political power through elections, the OBCs realised that they had little share in the country’s administrative apparatus, especially in the higher rungs of the bureaucracy. So they started clamouring for reservations in government jobs. Throughout the Congress rule until 1977, this demand fell on deaf ears. It was the Janata government, headed by Morarji Desai, that appointed the Mandal Commission in 1978. Ironically, by the time the commission submitted its report, the Janata was history and Indira Gandhi was back in power. She quietly consigned the document to the deep freeze. In Rajiv’s time, one of his cabinet ministers, Shiv Shanker, once asked about the Mandal report.

Another simple model you can use is the Fear vs. Love Model. Throughout your day, you either act out of fear or out of love. You act out of fear when your focus is on getting something, be it other people’s approval or attention, money or power. On the other hand, when you act out of love, your main focus is on giving, be it your time, money, love, or attention. You want to share and improve the lives of people around you, not for your own interest, but simply for the sake of it.

In his Viveka-Cudāmani (vs. 77), the famous Vedānta master Shankara characterizes objects (vishaya) as “poison” (visha), because they tarnish consciousness by distracting it from its real task, which is to mirror reality. Our attention is constantly pulled outward by objects, and this externalization of our consciousness prevents us from truly being ourselves. “When the mind pursues the roving senses,” states the Bhagavad-Gītā (2.67), “it carries away wisdom (prajnā), even as the wind [carries away] a ship on water.” Sense perceptions pollute our inner environment, keeping our mind in a state of turmoil. We are forever hoping for experiences that will make us happy and whole, but our desire for happiness can never be satisfied by external experiences. “Whatever pleasures spring from contact [with sense objects], they are only sources of suffering,” declares the Bhagavad-Gītā (5.22). To find true happiness and peace, we need to unclutter our mind and remain still. The fatal consequences of focusing on objects rather than the ultimate Subject, the Self, are described very well in that ancient Yoga scripture (2.62–63): When a man contemplates objects, attachment to them is produced. From attachment springs desire [for further contact with the objects] and from desire comes anger (when that desire is frustrated]. From anger arises confusion, from confusion [comes] failure of memory; from failure of memory [arises] the loss of wisdom (buddhi); upon the loss of wisdom, [a person] perishes. Emotional confusion (sammoha) profoundly upsets our cognitive faculties: We lose our sense of direction, purpose, and identity. The Sanskrit word for this state is smriti-bhramsha or “failure of memory/mindfulness.” When we fail to “recollect” ourselves, wisdom (buddhi) cannot shine forth. But without wisdom, we, as members of the species Homo sapiens, are doomed to forfeit not only our status as human beings but our very life. Spiritual ignorance is binding and ultimately ruinous. Wisdom can set us free. In Shankara’s Ātma-Bodha (vs. 16), we read: Even though the Self is all-pervading, it does not shine in everything. It shines only in the organ-of-wisdom (buddhi), like a reflection in a clear medium [such as water or a mirror]. The “organ of wisdom,” which is often called the “higher mind,” is predominantly composed of sattva, the lucidity factor of the cosmos. There is a family resemblance between the sattva and the Self, and this curious affinity makes it possible for the Self’s radiant presence to manifest itself to human beings.

The longest chapter in the Bible touts the Scriptures as being a soothing balm for the Psalmist’s troubled emotions. He doesn’t reveal what is rocking his boat, but the author of Psalm 119 is clearly under pressure. Repeatedly, the Psalmist says that his soul is “crushed with longing” (vs. 20), and that he is being treated poorly by somebody (vs. 22). So how does the Psalmist find comfort? You guessed it — from the Word of God. My soul weeps because of grief; strengthen me according to Your word (Psalm 119:28). That theme is repeated for 176 verses. Whatever is getting the Psalmist’s goat, he makes it clear that there is only one solution for his situation; the Word of God.

People whose religions commit them to the existence of the afterlife feel the terror of death just as anyone else does, nor are they spared the wrenching pain of loss. They do not respond to their loved one's death as though the loved one has moved to a place where they can't contact them for a while but expect to later rejoin them. They might say that is how they see the situation, but their profound sorrow and their mourning practices point in a different direction.

5. The Negro Must Make His Religion An Everyday Practice And Not Just A Sunday-Go-To-Meeting Emotional Affair.

Buy Verified PayPal Accounts If you want to more information just knock us– 24 Hours Reply/Contact Whatsapp: +1(620)6411479 Skype : pvausaseller Email: pvausaseller@gmail.com # Why You Should Never Buy Verified Coinbase Accounts — Risks, How to Stay Safe, and What to Do Instead (Quick note: I can’t help with buying or facilitating bought accounts. Below is a clear, practical, and SEO-friendly guide explaining why that’s dangerous and what to do instead.) ## Quick summary — what this article covers Thinking of buying a “verified Coinbase account”? Hold up. This guide explains, in plain language, why that’s a very risky move — legally, financially, and emotionally. You’ll learn what verification means, why people are tempted to buy accounts, the common scams, how to verify properly, how to secure your account, and what to do if something goes wrong. Think of this as a safety manual — with fireworks kept outside the tent, not inside. ## What “verified Coinbase account” means A “verified” account usually means the account owner completed identity checks (KYC — “Know Your Customer”) and maybe linked a bank or payment method. Verification gives access to higher limits and certain platform features. That sounds handy, but verification ties an account to a person’s real identity — and that’s where trouble begins if someone else owns or sold you that account. ## Why some people want to buy verified accounts Why the temptation? Speed and convenience. People may think: “I need a verified account fast,” or “My country is restricted,” or “I don’t want to share my ID.” Sellers promise instant verification, bypassing steps. It can sound like a shortcut around a long queue. But shortcuts often end at a dead end or a cliff — and that’s exactly what buying an account can feel like. ### The seller promise vs reality Sellers promise quick access, low price, sometimes “fully verified with credit cards and linked bank accounts.” Reality? Those promises are often smoke and mirrors. Accounts can be reclaimed, funds frozen, or the account may be a mule account used for fraud. If problems start, the buyer is left holding the bag. ## The legal risks Buying or using someone else’s verified account violates platform terms and can expose you to legal trouble. At a minimum, your account can be banned and funds lost. At worst, you could be caught up in investigations for fraud or money laundering — even if you didn’t know the account was dirty. That risk is not worth a few minutes of convenience. ### Platform terms and consequences Crypto platforms like Coinbase require accurate personal details. Using a sold account is almost always a breach of Terms of Service. Consequences include: permanent bans, confiscation of funds, reporting to financial authorities, and blocked access to other services that rely on identity checks. ### Criminal and civil exposure The more serious issue is legal liability. If an account has been used for scams, illicit transfers, or to hide stolen funds, anyone who controls that account could be accused or investigated. Legal outcomes vary by jurisdiction, but involvement in other people’s verified financial accounts can quickly become a criminal matter. If you want to more information just knock us– 24 Hours Reply/Contact Whatsapp: +1(620)6411479 Skype : pvausaseller Email: pvausaseller@gmail.com