Pp Stock Quotes

I'm a rich man, Brick, yep, I'm a mighty rich man. Y'know how much I'm worth? Guess, Brick! Guess how much I'm worth! Close to ten million in cash an' blue chip stocks, outside, mind you, of twenty-eight thousand acres of the richest land this side of the valley Nile! But a man can't buy his life with it, he can't buy back his life with it when his life has been spent, that's one thing not offered in the Europe fire-sale or in the American markets or any markets on earth, a man can't buy his life with it, he can't buy back his life when his life is finished... Big Daddy: (pp. 65)

Through [Frederick] Douglass’s story, we receive a caution against the nonreading life: If reading makes one unfit to be a slave, does choosing not to read submit one to an enslaved life? ...[Douglass] enlarged his interior world and was able to bring it to bear on his external reality. Reading the speeches from The Columbian Orator aloud in the attic in solitude, Douglass realized, “The more I read them, the better I understood them; these speeches added much to my limited stock of language, and had frequently flashed through my soul, and died away for want of utterance.” Reading empowered Douglass, granting him not only the ability to communicate with others but also the ability to express his own thoughts and feelings. In a world that defined him as chattel, Douglass demonstrated to his oppressors that he was always human and thus was meant to be free. (pp. 90-91)

Thus this matter of choosing the “best” stocks is at bottom a highly controversial one. Our advice to the defensive investor is that he let it alone. Let him emphasize diversification more than individual selection. Incidentally, the universally accepted idea of diversification is, in part at least, the negation of the ambitious pretensions of selectivity. If one could select the best stocks unerringly, one would only lose by diversifying. Yet within the limits of the four most general rules of common-stock selection suggested for the defensive investor (on pp. 114–115) there is room for a rather considerable freedom of preference. At the worst the indulgence of such preferences should do no harm; beyond that, it may add something worthwhile to the results. With the increasing impact of technological developments on long-term corporate results, the investor cannot leave them out of his calculations. Here, as elsewhere, he must seek a mean between neglect and overemphasis.