â
Judith Butler, a feminist and LGBT scholar and activist who was foundational to the development of queer Theory, epitomizes the opposite approach to this dilemma. In her most influential work, Gender Trouble,17 published in 1990, Butler focuses on the socially constructed nature of both gender and sex. For Butler, âwomanâ is not a class of people but a performance that constructs âgenderedâ reality. Butlerâs concept of gender performativityâbehaviors and speech that make gender realâallowed her to be thoroughly postmodern, deconstruct everything, and reject the notion of stable essences and objective truths about sex, gender, and sexuality, all while remaining politically active. This worked on two levels. Firstly, by referring to âreality-effectsâ and social or cultural âfictions,â Butler is able to address what she sees as the reality of social constructions of gender, sex, and sexuality. For Butler, the specific constructions themselves are not real, but it is true that constructions exist. Secondly, because the âqueerâ is understood to be that which falls outside of categories, especially those used to define male and female, masculine and feminine, heterosexual and homosexual, disrupting and dismantling those categories is essential to activism. âTo queerâ can therefore be used as a verb in the Butlerian sense, and the âqueeringâ of something refers to the destabilization of categories and the disruption of norms or accepted truths associated with it. The purpose of this is to liberate the âqueerâ from the oppression of being categorized.
â
â
Helen Pluckrose (Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identityâand Why This Harms Everybody)