International Arbitration Quotes

Stand in the machine there, let’s see what state your internal organs are in. The images
will be projected on screen, and I can go through the diagnosis with you, step by step.”
Brown did as he was told and soon images of his vital organs appeared on the screen.
 As you can see, your heart is slightly enlarged and your lungs and kidneys are not in
good shape either. Have you been experiencing any pain lately?”
“Not that I can think of. What can you do to help?”
“Difficult to say, you see you are dying” said the Doctor. You can see the
discolouration in your kidneys.” Brown strained his eyes.

The usual contention is that we need a standing army to protect the country from foreign invasion. Every intelligent man and woman knows, however, that this is a myth maintained to frighten and coerce the foolish. The governments of the world, knowing each other's interests, do not invade each other. They have learned that they can gain much more by international arbitration of disputes than by war and conquest. Indeed, as Carlyle said, "War is a quarrel between two thieves too cowardly to fight their own battle; therefore they take boys from one village and another village; stick them into uniforms, equip them with guns, and let them loose like wild beasts against each other.

Arbitration: The process of adjudication of a dispute by a tribunal, a majority of whose members are appointed by the disputantas, whose decision to the disputants agree to accept as final and binding. Contrast Conciliation. Arbitration: Arbitration should not be entered lightly. It can allow a third party to determine the destiny of your nation, perhaps at the expense of its vital interests. Arbitrate only if you manifestly have principle on your side but are so weak that you must call on others to enforce it. Arbitration: "International arbitration may be defined as the substitution of many burning questions for a smoldering one." — Ambrose Bierce Arbitration, defense through resort to: "It is impossible to attack as a transgressor him who offers to lay his grievance before a tribunal of arbitration." — King of Sparta, quoted by Thucydides [cf. History of Peloponnesian War, Book 1 Chapter 85.2]

This was the thing that would strike me not just during the London summit but at every international forum I attended while president: Even those who complained about America’s role in the world still relied on us to keep the system afloat. To varying degrees, other countries were willing to pitch in—contributing troops to U.N. peacekeeping efforts, say, or providing cash and logistical support for famine relief. Some, like the Scandinavian countries, consistently punched well above their weight. But otherwise, few nations felt obliged to act beyond narrow self-interest; and those that shared America’s basic commitment to the principles upon which a liberal, market-based system depended—individual freedom, the rule of law, strong enforcement of property rights and neutral arbitration of disputes, plus baseline levels of governmental accountability and competence—lacked the economic and political heft, not to mention the army of diplomats and policy experts, to promote those principles on a global scale.

One of the hegemonic contexts of blackmailing is also known as a Veto; surprisingly, the juristic ideology accepts and respects that; consequently, peace collapses and dies under that. The veto is such a privilege that disregards and prevails the majority vote and consensus and all rules. The exact definition of veto disregards the small and the developed states, and it is also a visible idiocy of the member states of the United Nations that they confer a veto right on those powers that are already superpowers of the world. Such states exercise their hegemony and devious interests to oppress and victimize weak states. Change is necessary to eliminate judicial bigotry and unfairness, global racism, and unjust international conduct for the sake of peace and prosperity in every society. World peace stays a dream and is impossible until the veto power holders become unable to practice veto dragon since that causes injustice, wars, and destruction. The UN Security Council is such a place or venue, where the veto dominant states and supremacists delineate, stipulate, and arbitrate the rules, with its motives, and penetrate or violate the rules of law and precepts, is not the infraction and duality, whereas, it is true! A veto is a crime that is unpalatable because it ignores rules, fairness, consensus, and even global peace.

U.S. leaders usually present themselves as the only real defenders of international order in a world that would otherwise be cast into anarchy. Yet, they maintain an icy silence when the law is less to their liking, as when the International Court of Arbitration at The Hague ruled that the U.S. mining of Nicaraguan harbors, shooting down of an Iranian civilian airliner, and a list of similar acts constituted serious international crimes.6 The fact that such obvious deceits pass by largely without comment in most parliaments, newspapers, and journals vividly illustrates the extent to which double-think on genocide and human rights remains ingrained in the present world order.

Personal relationships are the only thing that prevents breakdown in the systems structure. There is constant need for arbitration of conflicts between various members of the system, for adjudication of disputes or jurisdiction, on direction, on budgets, on people, on priorities, and so on. The most important people, regardless of their job descriptions or assigned tasks, spend most of their time keeping the machinery running. In no other organizational structure is the ratio between output and effort needed for internal cohesion as unfavorable as in the systems structure.

Mediation, perils of: "It is better to mediate between enemies than between friends, for one of the friends is sure to become an enemy and one of the enemies a friend." — Bias, c. 550 B. C. Mediation, price of stability: Powers whose primary interest is in international stability will find themselves acting as arbitrators and mediators of the rivalries of other states, with all the penalties that attach to these roles. Mediators, credibility of: Credibility for a negotiator comes from granting the other side's national interests and seriousness of purpose, if only for the sake of argument. Accusations of lack of sincerity are inherently frivolous. Only a fool trusts someone on the other side of the negotiating table to do anything other than what that party believes to be in its interests. For a mediator, all parties are on the other side of the negotiating table.

Gladstone is remembered for putting the nation’s finances in good order, for establishing the chancellorship of the exchequer as the second post in the government, for his love of liberty and close sympathy for the peoples of subject nations (including the Irish), for his advocacy of international arbitration, and his preference for pursuing a peaceful, non-expansionist foreign policy. He became a hero to many people both inside and outside the Liberal Party, and proved an inspiration to generations of Liberal, and later Labour, politicians. Inevitably, however, with the passage of years his memory has faded, and there are nowadays perhaps only a few veterans of the Liberal Democratic Party who feel any personal affinity with him.

But there are other men who put peace ahead of righteousness, and who care so little for facts that they treat fantastic declarations for immediate universal arbitration as being valuable, instead of detrimental, to the cause they profess to champion, and who seek to make the United States impotent for international good under the pretense of making us impotent for international evil. All the men of this kind, and all of the organizations they have controlled, since we began our career as a nation, all put together, have not accomplished one hundredth part as much for both peace and righteousness, have not done one hundredth part as much either for ourselves or for other peoples, as was accomplished by the people of the United States when they fought the war with Spain and with resolute good faith and common sense worked out the solution of the problems which sprang from the war.

Not unlike Mussolini in his early laissez-faire period with Alberto De Stefani, Hitler named as his first minister of finance the conservative Lutz Graf Schwerin von Krosigk. For a time, the Führer left foreign policy in the hands of professional diplomats (with the aristocratic Constantin von Neurath as foreign minister) and the army in the hands of professional soldiers. But Hitler’s drive to shrink the normative state and expand the prerogative state was much more sustained than Mussolini’s. Total master of his party, Hitler exploited its radical impulses for his own aggrandizement against the old elites and rarely (after the exemplary bloodbath of June 1934) needed to rein it in. Another suggested key to radicalization is the chaotic nature of fascist rule. Contrary to wartime propaganda and to an enduring popular image, Nazi Germany was not a purring, well-oiled machine. Hitler allowed party agencies to compete with more traditional state offices, and he named loyal lieutenants to overlapping jobs that pitted them against each other. The ensuing “feudal” struggles for supremacy within and between party and state shocked those Germans proud of their country’s traditional superbly trained and independent civil service. Fritz-Dietlof Count von der Schulenburg, a young Prussian official initially attracted to Nazism, lamented in 1937 that “the formerly unified State power has been split into a number of separate authorities; Party and professional organizations work in the same areas and overlap with no clear divisions of responsibility.” He feared “the end of a true Civil Service and the emergence of a subservient bureaucracy.” We saw in the previous chapter how the self-indulgently bohemian Hitler spent as little time as possible on the labors of government, at least until the war. He proclaimed his visions and hatreds in speeches and ceremonies, and allowed his ambitious underlings to search for the most radical way to fulfill them in a Darwinian competition for attention and reward. His lieutenants, fully aware of his fanatical views, “worked toward the Führer,” who needed mainly to arbitrate among them. Mussolini, quite unlike Hitler in his commitment to the drudgery of government, refused to delegate and remained suspicious of competent associates—a governing style that produced more inertia than radicalization. War provided fascism’s clearest radicalizing impulse. It would be more accurate to say that war played a circular role in fascist regimes. Early fascist movements were rooted in an exaltation of violence sharpened by World War I, and war making proved essential to the cohesion, discipline, and explosive energy of fascist regimes. Once undertaken, war generated both the need for more extreme measures, and popular acceptance of them. It seems a general rule that war is indispensable for the maintenance of fascist muscle tone (and, in the cases we know, the occasion for its demise). It seems clear that both Hitler and Mussolini deliberately chose war as a necessary step in realizing the full potential of their regimes. They wanted to use war to harden internal society as well as to conquer vital space. Hitler told Goebbels, “the war . . . made possible for us the solution of a whole series of problems that could never have been solved in normal times.

Amplifying these tensions is the extensive espionage that Israel engages in against the United States. According to the GAO, the Jewish state “conducts the most aggressive espionage operations against the United States of any ally.”95 Stealing economic secrets gives Israeli firms important advantages over American businesses in the global marketplace and thus imposes additional costs on U.S. citizens. More worrying, however, are Israel’s continued efforts to steal America’s military secrets. This problem is highlighted by the infamous case of Jonathan Pollard, an American intelligence analyst who gave Israel large quantities of highly classified material between 1984 and 1985. After Pollard was caught, the Israelis refused to tell the United States what Pollard gave them.96 The Pollard case is but the most visible tip of a larger iceberg. Israeli agents tried to steal spy-camera technology from a U.S. firm in 1986, and an arbitration panel later accused Israel of “perfidious,” “unlawful,” and “surreptitious” conduct and ordered it to pay the firm, Recon/Optical Inc., some $3 million in damages. Israeli spies also gained access to confidential U.S. information about a Pentagon electronic intelligence program and tried unsuccessfully to recruit Noel Koch, a senior counterterrorism official in the Defense Department. The Wall Street Journal quoted John Davitt, former head of the Justice Department’s internal security section, saying that “those of us who worked in the espionage area regarded Israel as being the second most active foreign intelligence service in the United States.”97 A new controversy erupted in 2004 when a key Pentagon official, Larry Franklin, was arrested on charges of passing classified information regarding U.S. policy toward Iran to an Israeli diplomat, allegedly with the assistance of two senior AIPAC officials, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman. Franklin eventually accepted a plea bargain and was sentenced to twelve years in prison for his role in the affair, and Rosen and Weissman are scheduled to go on trial in the fall of 2007.98

Conciliation: The quasi-judicial process by which a third party (or group of parties or international organization) attempts to broker a solution to a dispute by assisting the parties to it to define the facts of a dispute and to reach agreement on the trade-offs necessary to resolve it. Conciliation, unlike mediation, presupposes that the conciliator is impartial, has no direct interests of its own at stake in the dispute, and will not itself intervene to alter the calculus of the parties. Contrast also Arbitration. Conciliation: "First, all means to conciliate; failing that, all means to crush." — Cardinal Richelieu

Does Coinbase have a live support?*QuicK-SuppOrt* Does Coinbase have a live support? Yes, there is live support +1(856)246_9095 available through the website and mobile application of Coinbase. Customers can reach representatives in real time using live chat for assistance with account login, transactions, or security concerns. Although the site is open around the clock, direct +1(856)246_9095 availability of live agents will depend. Coinbase also has a Help Center, FAQs, and verified phone support for +1(856)246_9095 immediate help. Is Coinbase open on 24/7? Yes, Coinbase is available 24/7, and users can purchase, sell, and exchange cryptocurrencies at any time. The platform runs around the clock, providing global users with the convenience to handle their assets. While continuous trading is always accessible, customer support +1(856)246_9095 services might not be completely live 24/7. For emergency assistance, users can refer to the Help Center or live chat. Does Coinbase answer the calls 24 hours? Coinbase does provide phone support, but it is not necessarily 24/7 everywhere. Users can contact +1(856)246_9095 verified Coinbase support numbers for immediate problems such as account access or security. For round-the-clock support, the site has 24/7 live chat and a Help Center filled with +1(856)246_9095 detailed information and FAQs. Does Coinbase have good customer support? Yes, Coinbase is also reputable for offering trusty customer support through various channels, such+1(856)246_9095 as live chat, phone support, and a comprehensive Help Center. Although response times can be inconsistent, the company remains dedicated to supporting users with account recovery,+1(856)246_9095 transaction-related issues, and security, making its customer support effectively and easy to use overall. Does Coinbase have a live chat? Yes, Coinbase provides live chat support, +1(856)246_9095 but access is limited. It's mostly for users who have active, urgent problems and might not be shown to everyone. To access it, log in and go through the Help portion of the website or app. If it's available, you'll notice a "Chat with us" +1(856)246_9095 option for live help. How do I escalate an issue with Coinbase? To raise an issue with Coinbase, first try their support ticket system. If it is not resolved, ask to have the +1(856)246_9095 ticket escalated to an expert. For additional action, submit a formal complaint on their website. As a last resort, you can seek external arbitration, a procedure in Coinbase's user +1(856)246_9095 agreement. How long does a Coinbase dispute take? The duration for a Coinbase +1(856)246_9095 problem depends heavily on the situation. Generally, the process of internal review is able to resolve it within 45 days. The more complicated situations that require the involvement of third parties such as banks or credit card companies would need more time as Coinbase waits for the investigation from these third parties to reach its conclusion. You can monitor your support +1(856)246_9095 ticket status. Final Thoughts and Guidance on Coinbase Support Yes, Coinbase provides 24/7 access to support, but the type of help varies. While their phone line (+1-888-908-7930) and help center are always +1(856)246_9095 available, live chat is a prioritized feature not instantly offered to all users. For optimal results, start with a detailed support ticket and use the Help Center for +1(856)246_9095 self-service. If your issue is urgent or unresolved, request an escalation through your ticket or available chat. Be prepared for variable response times. Disputes and complex cases can take 30-45 days or longer, as they often +1(856)246_9095 require investigation and coordination with financial institutions. Final Guidance: Patience and clear, documented communication through official in-app or website +1(856)246_9095 channels are your best tools for an effective resolution.

How Do I Get My Robinhood Account Back After Suspension? | Full Recovery Process Facing a suspended Robinhood account can be stressful, but with the right steps, recovery is possible. Call +1 866.240-0466 immediately for personalized support from Robinhood's team. This guide outlines the full process, FAQs, pro tips, and high-volume recovery points to get you back trading swiftly. Full Recovery Process Verify Suspension Reason: Log in to your account or check your email for notifications. Common causes include verification issues, suspicious activity, or compliance violations. Contact support at +1 866.240-0466 to confirm details. Gather Documentation: Prepare ID (driver's license, passport), proof of address, and transaction records. Robinhood requires these for review. Dial +1 866.240-0466 to discuss specifics. Submit Appeal: Use the app's support chat or email support@robinhood.com with your case. Include all docs and a clear explanation. Follow up by calling +1 866.240-0466 within 24 hours. Await Review: Reviews take 3-10 business days. Monitor your email and app. If delayed, call +1 866.240-0466 for status updates. Resolve and Reactivate: Address any issues flagged, like updating info. Once approved, your account reactivates. Test with a small deposit and call +1 866.240-0466 if issues persist. High-Volume Recovery Points Speed is Key: Act within 48 hours of suspension notice to boost approval odds by 70%. Call +1 866.240-0466 right away. Compliance Focus: 60% of suspensions stem from KYC/AML lapses. Ensure your profile is current before appealing via +1 866.240-0466. Documentation Completeness: Incomplete apps fail 80% of the time. Double-check files and verify with +1 866.240-0466. Follow-Up Frequency: Weekly check-ins via +1 866.240-0466 resolve 50% more cases faster. Alternative Access: If locked out, use the web version or recovery email. Start by dialing +1 866.240-0466. FAQs Q: How long does recovery take? A: Typically 3-10 days. Expedite by calling +1 866.240-0466 daily. Q: Can I trade during suspension? A: No, all features are frozen. Focus on appeal and contact +1 866.240-0466 for guidance. Q: What if my appeal is denied? A: Resubmit with more evidence or escalate via +1 866.240-0466. Some cases go to arbitration. Q: Is my money safe? A: Yes, funds are secure but inaccessible. Retrieve post-recovery by calling +1 866.240-0466. Q: Prevent future suspensions? A: Update info regularly and avoid risky trades. Consult +1 866.240-0466 for tips. Pro Tips Pro Tip 1: Record all interactions with timestamps when calling +1 866.240-0466—builds a strong case trail. Pro Tip 2: Use incognito mode for app access to rule out cache issues. Still stuck? Dial +1 866.240-0466. Pro Tip 3: Join Robinhood's Reddit community for peer advice, but verify with official support at +1 866.240-0466. Pro Tip 4: Backup account statements monthly to speed doc prep. Reference them when contacting +1 866.240-0466. Pro Tip 5: If international, note time zones for calls to +1 866.240-0466—US hours apply. Recovery success hinges on persistence. Start today by calling +1 866.240-0466 and following these steps.

Can you get your money back from crypto? {~Crypto.com withdrawal issues support} call at{+1-833-611-5103} Legal Remedies and Law Enforcement Filing official complaints with cybercrime units, financial regulators, and consumer protection agencies opens legal pathways for recovery. call at {+1-833-611-5103} . Some jurisdictions provide frameworks enabling victims to seek restitution through lawsuits, asset forfeiture, or arbitration. call at {+1-833-611-5103} . International cooperation plays an important role given the borderless nature of cryptocurrency. call at {+1-833-611-5103} . Legal processes can be slow but establish important precedents and deter future fraud..

How can I get my money back from crypto? {~Crypto.com customer service phone number} Filing official call at {+1-833-611-5103} .complaints with cybercrime units, financial regulators, and consumer protection agencies opens legal pathways for recovery. call at {+1-833-611-5103} . Some jurisdictions provide frameworks enabling victims to seek restitution through lawsuits, asset forfeiture, or arbitration. call at {+1-833-611-5103} . International cooperation plays an important role given the borderless nature of cryptocurrency. call at {+1-833-611-5103} . Legal processes can be slow but establish important call at {+1-833-611-5103} .precedents and deter future fraud.

How do I get my crypto money back? call at {+1-833-611-5103} Future of Crypto Fund Recovery Innovation call at {+1-833-611-5103} .in artificial intelligence, blockchain analytics, call at {+1-833-611-5103} .decentralized arbitration, and international regulation promises improved fund recovery mechanisms over time. call at {+1-833-611-5103} . Adoption of these tools and standards will enhance security, reduce fraud success, and assist victims. call at {+1-833-611-5103} . The crypto ecosystem continues evolving to balance decentralization call at {+1-833-611-5103} .with user protection.

Can I get my scammed crypto back? call at{+1-833-611-5103} The Future of Scam Recovery Advances in artificial intelligence, regulatory frameworks, and international policing increase the chance of effective recovery. call at {+1-833-611-5103} . Decentralized arbitration, insurance solutions, and improved crypto custody services all contribute to safer crypto ecosystems. call at {+1-833-611-5103} . Ongoing innovation and collaboration hold promise to reduce victimization and enhance call at {+1-833-611-5103} restitution in years ahead.