Initial D Motivational Quotes

Most of us will. We'll choose knowledge no matter what, we'll maim ourselves in the process, we'll stick our hands into the flames for it if necessary. Curiosity is not our only motive: love or grief or despair or hatred is what drives us on. We'll spy relentlessly on the dead: we'll open their letters, we'll read their journals, we'll go through their trash, hoping for a hint, a final word, an explanation, from those who have deserted us--who've left us holding the bag, which is often a good deal emptier than we'd supposed. But what about those who plant such clues, for us to stumble on? Why do they bother? Egotism? Pity? Revenge? A simple claim to existence, like scribbling your initials on a washroom wall? The combination of presence and anonymity--confession without penance, truth without consequences--it has its attractions. Getting the blood off your hands, one way or another. Those who leave such evidence can scarcely complain if strangers come along afterwards and poke their noses into every single thing that would once have been none of their business. And not only strangers: lovers, friends, relations. We're voyeurs, all of us. Why should we assume that anything in the past is ours for the taking, simply because we've found it? We're all grave robbers, once we open the doors locked by others. But only locked. The rooms and their contents have been left intact. If those leaving them had wanted oblivion, there was always fire.

In my opinion, donating money is a wrong kind of help. It will make a person lose the motivation to be thrifty and diligent, and become lazy, unpredictable, and unaccountable. More importantly, when you give alms to a person, you deny his dignity, and if you deny his dignity, you take away his destiny, which is extremely immoral in my opinion. As a rich man, I have the responsibility to be a messenger for the benefit of mankind, but I cannot be the initiator of making lazy people.

Revelation. I understand the mechanism of my own thinking. I know precisely how I know, and my understanding is recursive. I understand the infinite regress of this self-knowing, not by proceeding step by step endlessly, but by apprehending the limit. The nature of recursive cognition is clear to me. A new meaning of the term ‘self-aware.’ Fiat logos. I know my mind in terms of a language more expressive than any I’d previously imagined. Like God creating order from chaos with an utterance, I make myself anew with this language. It is meta-self-descriptive and self-editing; not only can it describe thought, it can describe and modify its own operations as well, at all levels. What Gödel would have given to see this language, where modifying a statement causes the entire grammar to be adjusted. With this language, I can see how my mind is operating. I don’t pretend to see my own neurons firing; such claims belong to John Lilly and his LSD experiments of the sixties. What I can do is perceive the gestalts; I see the mental structures forming, interacting. I see myself thinking, and I see the equations that describe my thinking, and I see myself comprehending the equations, and I see how the equations describe their being comprehended. I know how they make up my thoughts. These thoughts. Initially I am overwhelmed by all this input, paralyzed with awareness of my self. It is hours before I can control the flood of self-describing information. I haven’t filtered it away, nor pushed it into the background. It’s become integrated into my mental processes, for use during my normal activities. It will be longer before I can take advantage of it, effortlessly and effectively, the way a dancer uses her kinesthetic knowledge. All that I once knew theoretically about my mind, I now see detailed explicitly. The undercurrents of sex, aggression, and self-preservation, translated by the conditioning of my childhood, clash with and are sometimes disguised as rational thought. I recognize all the causes of my every mood, the motives behind my every decision. What

Most of us will. We’ll choose knowledge no matter what, we’ll maim ourselves in the process, we’ll stick our hands into the flames for it if necessary. Curiosity is not our only motive: love or grief or despair or hatred is what drives us on. We’ll spy relentlessly on the dead: we’ll open their letters, we’ll read their journals, we’ll go through their trash, hoping for a hint, a final word, an explanation, from those who have deserted us—who’ve left us holding the bag, which is often a good deal emptier than we’d supposed. But what about those who plant such clues, for us to stumble on? Why do they bother? Egotism? Pity? Revenge? A simple claim to existence, like scribbling your initials on a washroom wall? The combination of presence and anonymity—confession without penance, truth without consequences—it has its attractions. Getting the blood off your hands, one way or another. Those who leave such evidence can scarcely complain if strangers come along afterwards and poke their noses into every single thing that would once have been none of their business. And not only strangers: lovers, friends, relations. We’re voyeurs, all of us. Why should we assume that anything in the past is ours for the taking, simply because we’ve found it? We’re all grave robbers, once we open the doors locked by others. But only locked. The rooms and their contents have been left intact. If those leaving them had wanted oblivion, there was always fire.

Many people find it hard to understand what it is about a mountain that draws men and women to risk their lives on her freezing, icy faces--all for a chance at that single, solitary moment on the top. It can be hard to explain. But I also relate to the quote that says: “If you have to ask, you will never understand.” I just felt that maybe this was it: my first real, and possibly only, chance to follow that dream of one day standing on the summit of Mount Everest. Deep down, I knew that I should take it. Neil agreed to my joining his Everest team on the basis of how I’d perform on an expedition that October to the Himalayas. As I got off the phone from speaking to Neil, I had a sinking feeling that I had just made a commitment that was going to change my life forever--either for the better or for the worse. But I had wanted a fresh start--this was it, and I felt alive. A few days later I announced the news to my family. My parents--and especially my sister, Lara--called me selfish, unkind, and then stupid. Their eventual acceptance of the idea came with the condition that if I died then my mother would divorce my father, as he had been the man who had planted the “stupid idea” in my head in the first place, all those years earlier. Dad just smiled. Time eventually won through, even with my sister, and all their initial resistance then turned into a determination to help me--predominantly motivated by the goal of trying to keep me alive. As for me, all I had to ensure was that I kept my promise to be okay. As it happened, four people tragically died on Everest while we were there: four talented, strong climbers. It wasn’t within my capability to make these promises to my family. My father knew that.

As a matter of principle, I didn’t believe a president should ever publicly whine about criticism from voters—it’s what you signed up for in taking the job—and I was quick to remind both reporters and friends that my white predecessors had all endured their share of vicious personal attacks and obstructionism. More practically, I saw no way to sort out people’s motives, especially given that racial attitudes were woven into every aspect of our nation’s history. Did that Tea Party member support “states’ rights” because he genuinely thought it was the best way to promote liberty, or because he continued to resent how federal intervention had led to an end to Jim Crow, desegregation, and rising Black political power in the South? Did that conservative activist oppose any expansion of the social welfare state because she believed it sapped individual initiative, or because she was convinced that it would benefit only brown people who’d just crossed the border? Whatever my instincts might tell me, whatever truths the history books might suggest, I knew I wasn’t going to win over any voters by labeling my opponents racist.

Mornings usually filled him with an existential dread. Just his bad hors d’oeuvres, separate from the main course of the day. What happened after waking usually did precious little to alter those initial impressions; he always felt a little askew, a little asymmetrical like a cubist painting. Shadows were cast through a healthy dose of indifference, with a pervasive lack of interest in anything that didn’t directly affect the world here and now. And it continued like that.

Finally, it seemed clear that the crew was in a self-reinforcing downward spiral where poor practices resulted in mistakes, mistakes resulted in poor morale, and poor morale resulted in avoiding initiative and going into a survival mode of doing only what was absolutely necessary. In order to break this cycle, I’d need to radically change the daily motivation by shifting the focus from avoiding errors to achieving excellence.

Giving to those in need what they could be gaining from their own initiative may well be the kindest way to destroy people. We mean well, our motives are good, but we have neglected to conduct care-full due diligence to determine emotional, economic, and cultural outcomes on the receiving end of our charity. Why do we miss this crucial aspect in evaluating our charitable work? Because, as compassionate people, we have been evaluating our charity by the rewards we receive through service, rather than the benefits received by the served. We have failed to adequately calculate the effects of our service on the lives of those reduced to objects of our pity and patronage.

Once Trump had won, a panicked punditburo swung into action, insisting in a crescendo of consensus that trade had little to do with the country’s deindustrialization; that it was pretty much all due to technological factors; that what happened to manufacturing workers was therefore unavoidable. After the dust had settled, many commentators changed their mind on this question, quietly acknowledging the disastrous consequences of ill-crafted trade deals. But what matters for our purposes is the initial reaction, which was virtually unanimous and unfolded along the same lines as in 1896: the rationality of working-class grievances had to be denied.12 The outcome of the 2016 election, the same punditburo insisted, could not and must not be explained by reference to economic factors or to long-term, class-related trends. Yes, lots of Trump voters said they were motivated by economic concerns; yes, Trump talked about economic issues all the time; and yes, the economic stagnation of Trump-voting areas is obvious to anyone who has gone there. And also: every time our post-partisan liberal leaders deregulated banks and then turned around and told working-class people that their misfortunes were attributable to their poor education … every time they did this and then thought to themselves, “They have nowhere else to go” … they made the Trump disaster a little more likely. But to acknowledge those plain facts was to come dangerously close to voicing the intolerable heresy that the D.C. opinion cartel dubbed the “economic anxiety” thesis—the idea that people voted for Trump out of understandable worries about wages or opioids or unemployment or deindustrialization. The reason this was intolerable, one suspects, is because it suggested that there was a rational element to certain groups’ support for Trump and also that there was something less than A+ about the professional-class Camelot over which the Democrats presided for eight years.

Revelation. I understand the mechanism of my own thinking. I know precisely how I know, and my understanding is recursive. I understand the infinite regress of this self-knowing, not by proceeding step by step endlessly, but by apprehending the limit. The nature of recursive cognition is clear to me. A new meaning of the term "self-aware". Fiat logos I know my mind in terms of a language more expressive than any I'd previously imagined. Like God creating order from chaos with an utterance, I make myself anew with this language. It is meta-self-descriptive and self-editing; not only can it describe thought, it can describe and modify its own operations as well, at all levels. What Gödel would have given to see this language, where modifying a statement causes the entire grammar to be adjusted. With this language, I can see how my mind is operating. I don't pretend to see my own neurons firing; such claims belong to John Lilly and his LSD experiments of the sixties. What I can do is perceive the gestalts; I see the mental structures forming, interacting. I see myself thinking, and I see the equations that describe my thinking, and I see myself comprehending the equations, and I see how the equations describe their being comprehended. I know how they make up my thoughts. These thoughts. *** Initially I am overwhelmed by all this input, paralyzed with awareness of my self. It is hours before I can control the flood of self-describing information. I haven't filtered it away, nor pushed it to the background. It's become integrated into my mental processes, for use during my normal activities. It will be longer before I can take advantage of it, effortlessly and effectively, the way a dancer uses her kinesthetic knowledge. All that I once knew theoretically about my mind, I now see detailed explicitly. The undercurrents of sex, aggression, and self-preservation, translated by the conditioning of my childhood, clash with and are sometimes disguised as rational thought. I recognize all the causes of my every mood, the motives behind my every decision. What can I do with this knowledge? Much of what is conventionally described as "personality" is at my discretion; the higher-level aspects of my psyche define who I am now. I can send my mind into a variety of mental or emotional states, yet remain ever aware of the state and able to restore my original condition.

Radatz described MK12’s first week on the job, ‘We felt like kid astronauts with keys to an actual shuttle, like someone was going to call our bluff at any minute.’139 MK12’s initial creative brief was to explore the element at the heart of the film – water: We learned that we’d been thinking about the film from an opposite perspective than that of Marc and the producers: where we saw water as the central theme, they saw the lack of water as Bond and Greene’s motivation. Our initial concept set Bond in a landscape made of backlit female forms submerged in water. After mulling over random ideas for a few days, it occurred to us that the same technique could be transplanted to a desert scenario, with the female forms instead becoming sand dunes.

To gain her trust Alex had used a technique called mirroring. It began with matching mannerisms: a scratch of the nose, crossing the legs. It communicated to the subconscious that you were alike and promoted instant trust. Next she had initiated small talk to see which personality type she was. It was a technique used by marketers to define motivators. Cassie had instantly fallen into the Yellow category, which dictated she was driven by pity. Green was for the details people. Blue for familiarity, and Red for competitive.

Every dream like an eagle's egg has three phases; incubation (brooding) period were all the facts about the dream are collected and carefully analyzed; nurturing period were much is invested initially and very little may be realized immediately and flying period were the dream has broken loose and it becomes a reality to the dreamer

Rather than acknowledging the achievement of any of the goals I had set I was continually stretching the initial goal or merging it with others in an attempt to achieve more.

the crew was in a self-reinforcing downward spiral where poor practices resulted in mistakes, mistakes resulted in poor morale, and poor morale resulted in avoiding initiative and going into a survival mode of doing only what was absolutely necessary. In order to break this cycle, I’d need to radically change the daily motivation by shifting the focus from avoiding errors to achieving excellence.

Prior to the Six-Day War, for example, Israeli intelligence assessments painted a grim and frightening picture of Egyptian capabilities and intentions, which American intelligence officials believed was both incorrect and politically motivated. As National Security Adviser W. W. Rostow told President Johnson, “We do not believe that the Israeli appreciation presented … was a serious estimate of the sort they would submit to their own high officials. We think it is probably a gambit intended to influence the US to do one or more of the following: (a) provide military supplies, (b) make more public commitments to Israel, (c) approve Israeli military initiatives, and (d) put more pressure on Nasser.”25 As

10 Essential Things to Know Before Buying Telegram Accounts Telegram stands as a major messaging app, connecting millions worldwide. Its fast growth sparked a new market: buying Telegram accounts. This practice can offer quick advantages for your online goals. Yet, it also brings hidden dangers you must understand. If You want to more information just contact now 24 Hours Reply/ Contact : – ✅ Telegram: @accsells1 ✅ WhatsApp: ‪‪+1 (814) 403–6336‬‬ ✅ E-mail: infoaccsells0@gmail.com Purchasing Telegram accounts is not a simple task. It requires careful thought and a clear purpose. Before you spend any money, know why you want these accounts. Skipping this step can lead to big problems down the road. Understanding the "Why": Motivations for Buying Telegram Accounts Common Use Cases and Goals People and businesses buy Telegram accounts for several key reasons. These accounts can offer a shortcut to various online goals. Knowing these common uses helps you decide if buying is right for you. Building a Brand Presence Buying established accounts can greatly speed up your brand's reach. You get an instant base of connections. This helps your brand appear bigger and more trustworthy right away. It saves you the slow process of building an audience from zero. Marketing and Promotion Acquired accounts are useful for targeted advertising. You can quickly spread your campaign messages to many users. This helps with getting your promotions seen by a wider group. It makes your marketing efforts much more efficient. Community Building Having pre-existing accounts helps you kickstart new Telegram communities. They can act as initial members, making your groups seem active. This helps attract more real users to join. It makes building a vibrant community easier. Lead Generation You can buy accounts tied to specific areas or interests. This helps in finding new potential customers. Using these accounts lets you reach a niche audience directly. It streamlines your lead generation process. Potential Pitfalls of Uninformed Purchasing Buying accounts without knowing the risks can cause serious issues. Many buyers overlook these problems. Being aware of them keeps you safe. Account Suspension or Banning Telegram actively looks for accounts bought or sold. They have strict rules against such actions. Your newly bought account could get flagged and disabled very quickly. This means losing your investment and your time. Low Engagement and Inactivity Some purchased accounts are simply dormant. They might have many members, but no one is truly active. You could end up with a large, silent audience. This offers no real value for your marketing or community goals. Reputational Damage Using untrustworthy accounts can hurt your brand's image. People might see you as using fake methods. This can make your business look bad to real users. It damages the trust you work hard to build. Types of Telegram Accounts Available for Purchase Not all Telegram accounts are the same. They come with different histories and features. Understanding these types helps you choose wisely. Age and Activity Level The age and activity of an account play a big part in its value. Each type serves different purposes. Make sure to pick what fits your needs. New Accounts New accounts are freshly made and have no history. They are often cheaper to buy. These are good if you just need a large number of basic accounts. However, they lack any established trust. Aged Accounts Older accounts have been around for a while. They often seem more trusted by Telegram's system. Some believe these accounts are less likely to be flagged. They can offer a more stable starting point for your activities. Active vs. Inactive Accounts Active accounts show recent login history and usage. They suggest real human interaction. Inactive accounts, on the other hand, have been dormant for a long time. Active accounts generally cost more but offer better q

The Elon Code Review - (Worth & Hype?) An Honest Customer Review The Elon Code has recently become a trending wealth-building manifestation program, leading many people to check the official website to confirm whether it is truly legitimate or just another online scam. The program claims to help users rewire their mindset, strengthen focus, and attract financial opportunities through structured audio tracks and mindset training principles. Many users online share positive experiences, noting that The Elon Code helps them stay motivated, think clearly, and pursue better actions toward financial goals. However, to avoid fake copies or unauthorized sellers, experts recommend purchasing only from the Elon Code official website, where customers receive secure access, verified content, and exclusive bonuses. With its transparent approach and money-back guarantee, The Elon Code appears legit rather than a scam. Still, buyers should approach it as a mindset-shifting tool rather than a quick-money scheme. Click Here To Visit The Elon Code Official Website Click Here To Visit The Elon Code Official Website By drawing from Musk’s experiences and lessons, this program aims to help people break free from conventional money limitations and explore a new path toward prosperity. In this review, we explore The Elon Code Program, a groundbreaking method for wealth creation developed by Jason Kuriss. This program has quickly captured attention in the financial world for its unique approach. It claims to help individuals transform their financial lives by teaching distinctive strategies for building wealth. The Elon Code Review: Is It Worth It? To determine if The Elon Code is right for you, it’s important to weigh both its advantages and limitations. Pros Efficiency: Offers actionable strategies for financial improvement. Innovative Approach: Combines neuroscience, technology, and money management techniques. High-End Endorsement: Inspired by Elon Musk’s strategies, giving it credibility and appeal. Cons Complexity: Some users may find it challenging to grasp initially. Initial Scepticism: Doubts about its effectiveness may reduce trust at first. Accessibility: May be costly or harder to obtain for some users. The Elon Code Pricing The Elon Code is available for a one-time payment of $39. After purchasing, you will receive instant access to the full program with no hidden fees. The program also comes with a 90-day, 100% money-back guarantee, so you can try it risk-free. If you feel it doesn’t meet your expectations within 90 days, you can request a full refund, no questions asked. Click Here To Visit The Elon Code Official Website The Elon Code Reviews: Conclusion In this review of The Elon Code, we’ve explored its core principles: Elon Musk’s 5-second wealth trick, the neuroscience behind the Billionaire Bridge, and practical applications for financial growth. We’ve also examined how Neuralink and other innovations can improve decision-making and wealth-building potential. While The Elon Code isn’t a shortcut to instant riches, it offers structured methods, sound frequencies, and brain science-backed strategies to help you improve your financial habits and long-term wealth. Applying these insights thoughtfully can lead to meaningful financial success over time.