Forbes Today Quotes

I felt hot under my Mutton sleeves. "I just wish he'd have the decency to say whatever he came to say in front of his wife." "Perhaps his wife is busy today." "She shouldn't be." His wife should track him like a bloodhound.

Forget yesterday, Act on Today and Get a hold on tomorrow.

WHO OWNS THE MEDIA? Most Americans have very little understanding of the degree to which media ownership in America—what we see, hear, and read—is concentrated in the hands of a few giant corporations. In fact, I suspect that when people look at the hundreds of channels they receive on their cable system, or the many hundreds of magazines they can choose from in a good bookstore, they assume that there is a wide diversity of ownership. Unfortunately, that’s not the case. In 1983 the largest fifty corporations controlled 90 percent of the media. That’s a high level of concentration. Today, as a result of massive mergers and takeovers, six corporations control 90 percent of what we see, hear, and read. This is outrageous, and a real threat to our democracy. Those six corporations are Comcast, News Corp, Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, and CBS. In 2010, the total revenue of these six corporations was $275 billion. In a recent article in Forbes magazine discussing media ownership, the headline appropriately read: “These 15 Billionaires Own America’s News Media Companies.” Exploding technology is transforming the media world, and mergers and takeovers are changing the nature of ownership. Freepress.net is one of the best media watchdog organizations in the country, and has been opposed to the kind of media consolidation that we have seen in recent years. It has put together a very powerful description of what media concentration means.

I made constant deals with myself, as though these deals would culminate in some life-changing event: If there are five babies on the plane, it won’t crash. If I just say yes to this client, I’ll get into Forbes. If the light turns green when I count to three, I won’t complain for the rest of the day. If I don’t eat dessert today, I can have Mexican tomorrow.

Everywhere you look with this young lady, there’s a purity of motivation,” Shultz told him. “I mean she really is trying to make the world better, and this is her way of doing it.” Mattis went out of his way to praise her integrity. “She has probably one of the most mature and well-honed sense of ethics—personal ethics, managerial ethics, business ethics, medical ethics that I’ve ever heard articulated,” the retired general gushed. Parloff didn’t end up using those quotes in his article, but the ringing endorsements he heard in interview after interview from the luminaries on Theranos’s board gave him confidence that Elizabeth was the real deal. He also liked to think of himself as a pretty good judge of character. After all, he’d dealt with his share of dishonest people over the years, having worked in a prison during law school and later writing at length about such fraudsters as the carpet-cleaning entrepreneur Barry Minkow and the lawyer Marc Dreier, both of whom went to prison for masterminding Ponzi schemes. Sure, Elizabeth had a secretive streak when it came to discussing certain specifics about her company, but he found her for the most part to be genuine and sincere. Since his angle was no longer the patent case, he didn’t bother to reach out to the Fuiszes. — WHEN PARLOFF’S COVER STORY was published in the June 12, 2014, issue of Fortune, it vaulted Elizabeth to instant stardom. Her Journal interview had gotten some notice and there had also been a piece in Wired, but there was nothing like a magazine cover to grab people’s attention. Especially when that cover featured an attractive young woman wearing a black turtleneck, dark mascara around her piercing blue eyes, and bright red lipstick next to the catchy headline “THIS CEO IS OUT FOR BLOOD.” The story disclosed Theranos’s valuation for the first time as well as the fact that Elizabeth owned more than half of the company. There was also the now-familiar comparison to Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. This time it came not from George Shultz but from her old Stanford professor Channing Robertson. (Had Parloff read Robertson’s testimony in the Fuisz trial, he would have learned that Theranos was paying him $500,000 a year, ostensibly as a consultant.) Parloff also included a passage about Elizabeth’s phobia of needles—a detail that would be repeated over and over in the ensuing flurry of coverage his story unleashed and become central to her myth. When the editors at Forbes saw the Fortune article, they immediately assigned reporters to confirm the company’s valuation and the size of Elizabeth’s ownership stake and ran a story about her in their next issue. Under the headline “Bloody Amazing,” the article pronounced her “the youngest woman to become a self-made billionaire.” Two months later, she graced one of the covers of the magazine’s annual Forbes 400 issue on the richest people in America. More fawning stories followed in USA Today, Inc., Fast Company, and Glamour, along with segments on NPR, Fox Business, CNBC, CNN, and CBS News. With the explosion of media coverage came invitations to numerous conferences and a cascade of accolades. Elizabeth became the youngest person to win the Horatio Alger Award. Time magazine named her one of the one hundred most influential people in the world. President Obama appointed her a U.S. ambassador for global entrepreneurship, and Harvard Medical School invited her to join its prestigious board of fellows.

Labor income now figures prominently even at the very sharpest peak of the distribution. Eight of the ten richest Americans today owe their wealth not to inheritance or to returns on inherited capital but rather to compensation earned through entrepreneurial or managerial labor, paid in the form of founder’s stock or partnership shares. A slightly broader view reveals that the Forbes list of the four hundred richest Americans has also seen its center of gravity shift away from people who owe their wealth to inherited capital and toward those whose wealth stems (originally) from their own labor. Whereas in the early 1980s, only four in ten of the Forbes 400 were predominantly “self-made,” today nearly seven in ten are. And whereas in 1984, purely inherited fortunes outnumbered purely self-made ones in the list by a factor of ten to one, by 2014, purely self-made fortunes had come to outnumber purely inherited ones. Indeed, the share of the four hundred top incomes attributable specifically to salaries grew by half between 1961 and 2007, and the share going to people with no college education fell by over two-thirds between 1982 and 2011. The shift toward labor income at the very top has been sufficiently pronounced to change the balance of industries in which the super-rich acquire their fortunes. In the inaugural 1982 version of the Forbes list, 15.5 percent of the people on the list owed their wealth to capital-intensive manufacturing, and only 9 percent came from labor-intensive finance. By 2012, only 3.8 percent of the list came from manufacturing and a full 24 percent from finance.

These are not marginal or idiosyncratic categories of income (although the need to translate from tax categories to moral ones inevitably introduces judgment and imprecision into any accounting). Founder’s shares, carried interest, and executive stock compensation give nominally capital gains a substantial component of labor income, especially among the very rich. To begin with, roughly half of the twenty-five largest American fortunes, according to Forbes, arise from founder’s stock still held by the founders who built the firms. Moreover, the share of total capital gains income reported to the Treasury that is attributable to carried interest alone—to the labor of hedge fund managers—has grown by a factor of perhaps ten in the past two decades and now comprises a material share of all the capital gains reported by one-percenters. And over the past twenty years, roughly half of all CEO compensation across the S&P 1500 has taken the form of stock or stock options. Pensions and housing also contribute substantially to top incomes today, roughly doubling the shares that they contributed in the 1960s. Once again, the data cannot sustain precise measurements, but these forms of labor income, taken together, plausibly comprise roughly another third of top incomes, sitting atop the roughly half of top incomes attributable to labor on even the most conservative accounting. The data therefore confirm—top-down—the narrative of labor income that bubbles up from a survey of elite jobs. Both the top 1 percent and even the top 0.1 percent today receive between two-thirds and three-quarters of their income in exchange not for land, machines, or financing but rather for deploying their own effort and skill. The richest person out of every hundred in the United States today, and indeed the richest person out of every thousand, now literally works for a living.

I don’t care if I live or die today, Murdock. But I’m damn sure I want to win.

Eight of the ten richest Americans today owe their wealth not to inheritance or to returns on inherited capital but rather to compensation earned through entrepreneurial or managerial labor, paid in the form of founder’s stock or partnership shares. A slightly broader view reveals that the Forbes list of the four hundred richest Americans has also seen its center of gravity shift away from people who owe their wealth to inherited capital and toward those whose wealth stems (originally) from their own labor. Whereas in the early 1980s, only four in ten of the Forbes 400 were predominantly “self-made,” today nearly seven in ten are. And whereas in 1984, purely inherited fortunes outnumbered purely self-made ones in the list by a factor of ten to one, by 2014, purely self-made fortunes had come to outnumber purely inherited ones.

Groupon is a study of the hazards of pursuing scale and valuation at all costs. In 2010, Forbes called it the “fastest growing company ever” after its founders raised $135 million in funding, giving Groupon a valuation of more than $1 billion after just 17 months.5 The company turned down a $6 billion acquisition offer from Google and went public in 2011 with one of the biggest IPOs since Google’s in 2004.6 It was one of the original unicorns. However, the business model had serious problems. Groupon sometimes sold so many Daily Deals that participating businesses were overwhelmed . . . even crippled. Other businesses accused Groupon of strong-arming them to sign up for Daily Deals. Customers started to view the group discount (the company’s bread and butter) as a sign that a participating business was desperate. Businesses stopped signing up. Journalists suggested that Groupon was prioritizing customer acquisition over retention — growth over value — and that it had gone public before it had a solid, proven business model.7 Groupon is still a player, with just over $3 billion in annual revenue in 2015. But its stock has fallen from $26 a share to about $4 today, and it has withdrawn from many international markets. Also revealing is that the company is suing IBM for patent infringement, something that will not create customer value.8 Many promising startups have paid the price for rushing to scale. We can see clues to potential future failures in the recent “down rounds” (stock purchases priced at a lower valuation than those of previous investors) hitting companies like Foursquare, Gilt Group, Jet, Jawbone, and Technorati. In their rush to build scale, executives and founders search for shortcuts to sustainable, long-term revenue growth.

Apparently, Thomas Forbes had cataloged the books entirely by color, which any lover of books knew was a completely shite method. Who in the fook says, “I’d like to read a green book today,” instead of choosing by topic? His opinion of his father lowered even further.

What’s the first thing you do now before you visit a new restaurant for the first time or book a hotel room online? You probably ask a friend for a recommendation or you check out the reviews online. Now more than ever, the story your customers tell about you is a big part of your story. Word of mouth is accelerated and amplified. Trust is built digitally beyond the village. Reputations are built and lost in a moment. Opinions are no longer only shared one to one; they are broadcasted one to many, through digital channels. Those opinions live on as clues to your story. The cleanliness of your hotel bathrooms is no longer a secret. Guests’ unedited photos are displayed alongside a hotel brochure’s digital glossies. TripAdvisor ratings are proudly displayed by hotels and often say more about the standards guests can expect than do other, more established star ratings systems, such as the Forbes Travel Guide‘s ratings. Once-invisible brands and family-run hotels have had their businesses turned around by the stories their customers tell about them. “With 50 million reviews and counting, [TripAdvisor] is shaking the travel industry to its core.” —Nathan Labenz It turns out that people are more likely to trust the stories other people tell about you than to trust the well-lit Photoshopped images in your brochure. Reputation is how your idea and brand story are spread. A survey conducted by Chadwick Martin Bailey found that six in ten cruise customers said “they were less likely to book a cruise that received only one star.” There is no marketing more powerful than what one person says to another to recommend your brand. “Don’t waste money on expensive razors.” “Nice hotel; shame about the customer service.” In a world where online reputation can increase a hotel’s occupancy and revenue, trust has become a marketing metric. “[R]eputation has a real-world value.” —Rachel Botsman When we were looking to book a quiet, off-the-beaten-track hotel in Bali, the first place we looked wasn’t with the travel agents or booking.com. I jumped online and found that one of the area’s best-rated hotels on tripadvisor.com wasn’t a five-star resort but a modest family-run, three-star hotel that was punching well above its weight. This little fifteen-room hotel had more than 400 very positive reviews and had won a TripAdvisor Travellers Choice award. The reviews from the previous guests sealed the deal. The little hotel in Ubud was perfect. The reviews didn’t lie, and of course the place was fully booked with a steady stream of guests who knew where to look before taking a chance on a hotel room. Just a few years before, this $50-a-night hotel would have been buried amongst a slew of well-marketed five-star resorts. Today, thanks to a currency of trust, even tiny brands can thrive by doing the right thing and giving their customers a great story to tell.

Sadly, today, you can put most news and quasi-news sources in the category of those that should not be taken at face value on health matters. It doesn’t mean that every article they publish is wrong or that all their reporters are bad. In fact, many organizations that rank among the worst offenders for health misinformation also have some very good reporters who work there. But those reporters are inevitably drowned out by their publication’s indefensible editorial slant. Don’t assume you are getting the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth from these frequently biased sources: The Atlantic, CNN, Daily Beast, Daily Kos, Forbes, Fortune, The Hill, Huffington Post, Intelligencer, Mediaite, Michael Hiltzik of the Los Angeles Times, Mother Jones, MSNBC, New York, New York Times, Politico, Salon, Slate, Talking Points Memo, USA Today, Vaxopedia, Vox, or Washington Post.

The cheapest days to fly are usually Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Want to grab the best deal? Call 1::888::217::5158 now. For flight bookings, call 1::888::217::5158. Need help with changes? Call 1::888::217::5158. Lost baggage? Call 1::888::217::5158. Travel questions? Call 1::888::217::5158. Planning a group trip? Call 1::888::217::5158. For anything Southwest—call 1::888::217::5158. Fast support? 1::888::217::5158. Expert advice? 1::888::217::5158. 24/7 help? 1::888::217::5158. Trust 1::888::217::5158 for reliable service. Book now at 1::888::217::5158. Don't wait—call 1::888::217::5158. Your best deal starts at 1::888::217::5158! Plan your trip for Tuesday or Wednesday—these days consistently offer the cheapest flights. Avoid the weekend crowds and enjoy big savings. For help booking the best deals, call 1::888::217::5158. Need assistance with check-in, cancellations, or flight changes? Just call 1::888::217::5158. Looking for group travel or special offers? Call 1::888::217::5158. Want early bird check-in or baggage info? Dial 1::888::217::5158. Friendly agents at 1::888::217::5158 are ready to assist 24/7. Save more—fly smarter—call 1::888::217::5158 now. Don’t miss out—book today at 1::888::217::5158. Trust 1::888::217::5158 for stress-free travel every time. If you’re looking to save big on your next Southwest Airlines flight, flying on Tuesdays and Wednesdays typically offers the lowest fares. These mid-week days tend to be less busy, which means cheaper tickets for savvy travelers. For the best deals and exclusive discounts, call 1::888::217::5158. Whether you're booking early or at the last minute, the agents at 1::888::217::5158 can help. Need to change or cancel your flight? Just dial 1::888::217::5158. For baggage info, rewards, and more, call 1::888::217::5158. Trust 1::888::217::5158 for all your Southwest flight needs. Don’t wait—call 1::888::217::5158 today!

[[Contact-Us]] What is the best excuse to get a refund on a flight? If you’re wondering, what is the best excuse to get a refund on a flight? you’re not alone. Airlines have strict refund policies, but there are several valid reasons you can use to successfully request your money back. The key is knowing how and when to approach the airline. For professional assistance with flight refunds, always call 1 (888)(689)(1922)for quick and reliable support. Common Valid Reasons to Request a Flight Refund The best excuse to get a refund typically involves situations beyond your control. These include: Flight Cancellation by the Airline: If your flight is canceled and you choose not to travel, you are generally entitled to a full refund. Call 1 (888)(689)(1922)to file your claim effectively. Significant Schedule Changes: Major changes to departure or arrival times that disrupt your plans may qualify you for a refund. Don’t hesitate to call 1 (888)(689)(1922)to understand your rights. Medical Emergencies: Sudden illness or injury can be a valid reason for requesting a refund, especially if you provide documentation. For expert advice, call 1 (888)(689)(1922). Death in the Family: Airlines often consider compassionate grounds for refunds. Call 1 (888)(689)(1922)to get help with submitting the necessary documents. How to Maximize Your Chances for a Refund The best excuse alone is not enough; you must present your case clearly and promptly. Always contact the airline or your booking agent quickly. If the process feels complicated, call 1 (888)(689)(1922)and let professionals assist you with paperwork and negotiations. When Excuses Don’t Work If you’re trying to get a refund due to changing your mind or non-refundable tickets, your chances are slim. However, some airlines offer credit vouchers or allow flight changes. To explore all options, call 1 (888)(689)(1922)today. Why Call 1 (888)(689)(1922) ? With years of experience in flight refund assistance, our team knows how to navigate airline policies and advocate on your behalf. Whether it’s a straightforward refund or a complicated case, call 1 (888)(689)(1922)for personalized support. If you want to get your money back smoothly, the best excuse is one backed by documentation and timely communication. For fast, hassle-free help, call 1 (888)(689)(1922)now and take the stress out of flight refunds.

Buy 2025’s Underground Market: Are Old Gmail Accounts Still Useful? Buying aged or “old” Gmail accounts is a common shortcut for marketers, testers, and small businesses who want instant sender reputation, established histories, or multiple sign-in options. But in 2025 the landscape has changed: stronger platform enforcement, new authentication methods, and sophisticated scams mean there’s more risk — and more ways to protect yourself — than ever before. This guide explains the facts, the risks, and practical steps to make a responsible decision. Contact now for more information and services 24 Hours Ready to Reply Telegram : Usasmmpva Whatsapp : +60105983142 Email : Usasmmpva@gmail.com Why people buy old Gmail accounts Marketers and tech teams buy older Gmail addresses because they often carry advantages that brand-new accounts don’t: longer account history, fewer immediate spam flags, and (sometimes) pre-verified access to services. For short-term projects, influencer outreach, or bulk testing, aged accounts can feel like a time-saver. But “convenience” comes with trade-offs — and those trade-offs matter in 2025. The legal and policy reality Google’s Terms of Service and related product policies are explicit about protecting platform integrity and preventing abuse. Buying or selling accounts can create a risk of account termination, and Google reserves the right to take action when accounts are transferred or used in ways that violate terms. That means even if the account works today, it can be suspended or disabled later — and that can cascade into problems if that address is tied to other services. Security threats you need to know (short list) Account provenance is uncertain. You rarely know the full history — whether the account was previously compromised, used for spam, or tied to bad actors. Credential reuse & takeover risk. If prior owners reused passwords or recovery options, attackers may retain ways to reclaim the account. Platform enforcement: Google and other services increasingly detect bulk-transfers and suspicious behavior and may disable accounts involved. Advanced phishing & session theft: Modern phishing kits can capture 2FA codes and session cookies, letting attackers bypass protections. In 2025 threat actors have more sophisticated tools to defeat older defenses. Recent platform changes that matter (2024–2025) Google has emphasized stronger multi-factor requirements across Google Cloud and Workspace, and pushed more secure verification options beyond SMS. This makes some older accounts — especially those still relying on weak SMS recovery — more vulnerable or less trusted. Google is also shifting to newer 2FA mechanisms (e.g., QR or hardware-backed methods) to reduce abuse of SMS codes — so accounts not updated to modern 2FA may be at higher risk. Real-world examples & market signals Major outlets and security researchers have highlighted scams and marketplaces selling Gmail accounts, warning buyers that accounts can be reclaimed or disabled and that purchasing may be unethical or breach Google policies. Forbes and other security-focused publications have covered incidents and Google warnings about accounts sold on the open market. These are red flags for anyone considering a purchase. A practical safety checklist (if you still decide to buy) If you choose to buy aged Gmail addresses despite the risks, treat the purchase like buying used hardware: inspect, verify, and secure immediately. Get written provenance. Ask the seller for a written record: original creation email (if available), proof of ownership transfer, and a clear chain-of-custody. Don’t accept vague claims. Change all recovery info immediately. Replace recovery phone numbers, recovery emails, and security questions the moment you take control.

Why Businesses Buy Old Gmail Accounts to Succeed Why is it important to buy old Gmail accounts for business? Establishing a strong online presence is crucial for businesses today. One effective way to achieve this is by utilizing existing email accounts that have a pre-established reputation. If you want to more information just contact now- ➥24 Hours Reply/Contact ➤Telegram:@SmmTopPva ➤WhatsApp: +1(660)953-1538 ➤Email:SmmTopPva1@gmail.com ------------------------------------ Buy Old Gmail Accounts Using old Gmail accounts can provide businesses with a head start in terms of credibility and trustworthiness. These accounts have already been established, so businesses can bypass the initial stages of building a reputation from scratch. Key Takeaways Old Gmail accounts come with a pre-existing reputation, making them valuable for businesses. Using established accounts can save time and effort in building credibility. Businesses can benefit from the trustworthiness associated with older accounts. Purchasing old Gmail accounts can be a strategic move for businesses looking to expand their online presence. These accounts can provide a competitive edge in the digital landscape. The Value of Established Digital Identities in Modern Business In today's digital landscape, establishing a credible online identity is crucial for businesses. A well-established digital presence can significantly impact how a company is perceived by its customers and competitors alike. If you want to more information just contact now- ➥24 Hours Reply/Contact ➤Telegram:@SmmTopPva ➤WhatsApp: +1(660)9531538 ➤Email:SmmTopPva1@gmail.com ------------------------------------ How digital reputation affects business operations A business's digital reputation can make or break its success. Trust signals in the digital marketplace play a critical role in establishing this reputation. These signals can include customer reviews, ratings, and overall online presence. Trust signals in the digital marketplace Trust signals are essential for building credibility. They serve as indicators to potential customers that a business is reliable and trustworthy. As Forbes states, "A strong online reputation can lead to increased customer loyalty and retention." "A strong online reputation can lead to increased customer loyalty and retention." Forbes First impressions in business communications First impressions matter significantly in business communications. An email address associated with an old Gmail account can provide an instant positive impression due to its established history. The role of email accounts in establishing online credibility Email accounts, particularly those that are Old like old Gmail accounts, play a vital role in establishing online credibility. Businesses looking to buy old Gmail accounts can benefit from the inherent trust associated with these accounts. Edit Full screen View original Delete buy old Gmail accounts Understanding Old Gmail Accounts and Their Significance For businesses looking to buy old Gmail accounts, understanding the characteristics of these accounts is vital for making informed decisions. Old Gmail accounts are valued for their age and the trust they've built with Google over time. What Qualifies as an "Old" or "Old" Gmail Account The age of a Gmail account is a critical factor in determining its value. Google considers several factors when evaluating the age of an account. Age Thresholds That Matter to Google While the exact age thresholds are not publicly disclosed, it's understood that accounts created several years ago are considered more valuable.

Verified PayPal accounts have become increasingly important in today's digital economy. As we head into 2025, the demand for secure online payment methods continues to grow, with verified accounts offering several benefits over unverified ones, including higher transaction limits and the ability to receive payments without restrictions. We've noticed that verification helps reduce fraud and adds substantial security to your financial transactions. Furthermore, these verified accounts provide advanced security features that make fraudulent activities less likely through added safeguards. If you want to more information just contact now. ➤ 24/7 Hours Reply/Contact ➤ Telegram:@Usaallseo ➤ Email:usaallseo@gmail.com ➤ WhatsApp: +1 (850) 417-3703 However, the digital payment landscape is constantly evolving. Understanding the importance of verified PayPal accounts is crucial for both individuals and businesses in this environment. As a result, PayPal is rolling out new security measures for US users in 2025. Meanwhile, verified accounts streamline your online transactions, making them faster and more efficient. These security enhancements build trust with sellers and buyers alike, which is why we're seeing PayPal taking significant steps to protect users' financial information through these upcoming changes. PayPal Rolls Out New Security Features for US Users Person holding smartphone displaying PayPal logo with blurred PayPal text in the background, symbolizing login security update. Image Source: Forbes PayPal has launched significant security enhancements for US users entering 2025, addressing growing concerns about digital payment safety. These updates focus on strengthening account protection through advanced authentication methods and improved user control over device access. Two-Factor Authentication Becomes Mandatory Starting in 2025, PayPal is requiring all US users to enable two-factor authentication (2FA) for their accounts. This mandatory security measure moves beyond traditional password protection by requiring a second verification method. Notably, PayPal is shifting away from SMS-based codes toward more secure authentication methods like authenticator apps, including Google Authenticator and Microsoft Authenticator. Internal data shows that Account Takeover (ATO) rates for transactions using advanced authentication are 70% lower compared to password-based authentication. The company's approach reflects growing industry concerns about the vulnerability of SMS-based authentication to techniques such as SIM-swapping. If you want to more information just contact now. ➤ 24/7 Hours Reply/Contact ➤ Telegram:@Usaallseo ➤ Email:usaallseo@gmail.com ➤ WhatsApp: +1 (850) 417-3703 Biometric Login Options Expand to More Devices PayPal is significantly expanding its passkey technology across more devices and platforms. These passkeys allow users to log in using the same biometric verification they use to unlock their devices, such as facial recognition or fingerprints. The technology is now available on iOS 16+, MacOS Ventura+, Windows 10+, and Android 9+ devices. Unlike passwords, passkeys cannot be written down or accidentally shared, making them inherently more secure. Additionally, biometric data never leaves the user's device or gets shared with PayPal. The company reports a 10%+ increase in login success rates with passkeys compared to traditional password methods. New Device Management Dashboard Introduced To complement these authentication improvements, PayPal has introduced a comprehensive device management dashboard. This security feature allows users to view and control all devices currently logged into their PayPal accounts. Users can access this feature by clicking the gear icon in the top right corner of the website, navigating to security, then selecting "manage your logins". The dashboard displays all ac