Fixed Rate Energy Quotes

There is nothing new about prophecies to the effect that the end of the world is near if we do not repent. What is new is that such a prophecy is now true, for two obvious reasons. First, nuclear weapons give us the means to wipe ourselves out quickly: no humans possessed this means before. Second, we already appropriate about forty per cent of the Earth’s net productivity (that is, the net energy captured from sunlight). With the world’s human population now doubling every forty-one years, we will soon have reached the biological limit to growth, at which point we will have to start fighting each other in deadly earnest for a slice of the world’s fixed pie of resources. In addition, given the present rate at which we are exterminating species, most of the world’s species will become extinct or endangered within the next century, but we depend on many species for our own life support.

Summers also claimed that technology was reducing the demand for capital. Digital businesses, such as Facebook and Google, had established dominant global franchises with relatively little invested capital and small workforces. In his book The Zero Marginal Cost Society (2014), the social theorist Jeremy Rifkin heralded the passing of traditional capitalism.16 If the Old Economy was marked by scarcity and declining marginal returns, Rikfin argued that the New Economy was characterized by zero marginal costs, increasing returns to scale and capital-lite ‘sharing’ apps (such as Uber, Lyft, Airbnb, etc.). The demand for capital and interest rates, he said, were set to fall in this ‘economy of abundance’. There was some evidence to support Rifkin’s claims. The balance sheets of US companies showed they were using fewer fixed assets (factories, plant, equipment, etc.) and reporting more ‘intangibles’ – namely, assets derived from patents, intellectual property and merger premiums. In much of the rest of the world, however, the demand for old-fashioned capital remained as strong as ever. After the turn of the century, the developing world exhibited a voracious appetite for industrial commodities that required massive mining investment. China embarked on what was probably the greatest investment boom in history. Before and after 2008, global energy consumption rose steadily. The world’s total investment (relative to GDP) remained in line with its historical average.17 Rifkin’s ‘economy of abundance’ remained a tantalizing speculation.

A fourth possibility: It could be that belief is causally efficacious semantically as well as syntactically with respect to behavior, but maladaptive. As Stich points out, it is quite possible (and quite in accord with current evolutionary theory) that a system or trait that is in fact maladaptive, at any rate less adaptive than available alternatives should nonetheless become fixed and survive. Perhaps the belief systems of these creatures are like the albinism found in many arctic animals, or like sickle cell anemia, maladaptive, but connected with genes coding for behavior or traits conducive to survival. They could be maladaptive in two ways. First, perhaps their beliefs are a sort of energy expensive distraction, causing these creatures to engage in survival enhancing behavior, all right, but in a way less efficient and economic than if the causal connections by passed belief altogether. Second, it could be that beliefs in fact produce maladaptive behavior. Perhaps a mildly maladaptive belief behavior structure is coded for by the same genetic structure that produces some adaptive behavior. Suppose these creatures' beliefs do not for the most part produce adaptive behavior: the mechanisms that produce them might nonetheless survive. Perhaps on balance their behavior is sufficiently adaptive, even if not every segment of it is. Some probability, then, must be reserved for the possibility that these creatures have cognitive faculties that are maladaptive, but nonetheless survive; and on this possibility, once more, the probability that their beliefs would be for the most part true is fairly low.

The chorus of criticism culminated in a May 27 White House press conference that had me fielding tough questions on the oil spill for about an hour. I methodically listed everything we'd done since the Deepwater had exploded, and I described the technical intricacies of the various strategies being employed to cap the well. I acknowledged problems with MMS, as well as my own excessive confidence in the ability of companies like BP to safeguard against risk. I announced the formation of a national commission to review the disaster and figure out how such accidents could be prevented in the future, and I reemphasized the need for a long-term response that would make America less reliant on dirty fossil fuels. Reading the transcript now, a decade later, I'm struck by how calm and cogent I sound. Maybe I'm surprised because the transcript doesn't register what I remember feeling at the time or come close to capturing what I really wanted to say before the assembled White House press corps: That MMS wasn't fully equipped to do its job, in large part because for the past thirty years a big chunk of American voters had bought into the Republican idea that government was the problem and that business always knew better, and had elected leaders who made it their mission to gut environmental regulations, starve agency budgets, denigrate civil servants, and allow industrial polluters do whatever the hell they wanted to do. That the government didn't have better technology than BP did to quickly plug the hole because it would be expensive to have such technology on hand, and we Americans didn't like paying higher taxes - especially when it was to prepare for problems that hadn't happened yet. That it was hard to take seriously any criticism from a character like Bobby Jindal, who'd done Big Oil's bidding throughout his career and would go on to support an oil industry lawsuit trying to get a federal court to lift our temporary drilling moratorium; and that if he and other Gulf-elected officials were truly concerned about the well-being of their constituents, they'd be urging their party to stop denying the effects of climate change, since it was precisely the people of the Gulf who were the most likely to lose homes or jobs as a result of rising global temperatures. And that the only way to truly guarantee that we didn't have another catastrophic oil spill in the future was to stop drilling entirely; but that wasn't going to happen because at the end of the day we Americans loved our cheap gas and big cars more than we cared about the environment, except when a complete disaster was staring us in the face; and in the absence of such a disaster, the media rarely covered efforts to shift America off fossil fuels or pass climate legislation, since actually educating the public on long-term energy policy would be boring and bad for ratings; and the one thing I could be certain of was that for all the outrage being expressed at the moment about wetlands and sea turtles and pelicans, what the majority of us were really interested in was having the problem go away, for me to clean up yet one more mess decades in the making with some quick and easy fix, so that we could all go back to our carbon-spewing, energy-wasting ways without having to feel guilty about it. I didn't say any of that. Instead I somberly took responsibility and said it was my job to "get this fixed." Afterward, I scolded my press team, suggesting that if they'd done better work telling the story of everything we were doing to clean up the spill, I wouldn't have had to tap-dance for an hour while getting the crap kicked out of me. My press folks looked wounded. Sitting alone in the Treaty Room later that night, I felt bad about what I had said, knowing I'd misdirected my anger and frustration. It was those damned plumes of oil that I really wanted to curse out.

All day long the red squirrels came and went, and afforded me much entertainment by their manoeuvres. One would approach at first warily through the shrub-oaks, running over the snow crust by fits and starts like a leaf blown by the wind, now a few paces this way, with wonderful speed and waste of energy, making inconceivable haste with his “trotters,” as if it were for a wager, and now as many paces that way, but never getting on more than half a rod at a time; and then suddenly pausing with a ludicrous expression and a gratuitous somerset, as if all the eyes in the universe were fixed on him,—for all the motions of a squirrel, even in the most solitary recesses of the forest, imply spectators as much as those of a dancing girl,—wasting more time in delay and circumspection than would have sufficed to walk the whole distance,—I never saw one walk,— and then suddenly, before you could say Jack Robinson, he would be in the top of a young pitch-pine, winding up his clock and chiding all imaginary spectators, soliloquizing and talking to all the universe at the same time,—for no reason that I could ever detect, or he himself was aware of, I suspect. At length he would reach the corn, and selecting a suitable ear, frisk about in the same uncertain trigonometrical way to the top-most stick of my wood-pile, before my window, where he looked me in the face, and there sit for hours, supplying himself with a new ear from time to time, nibbling at first voraciously and throwing the half-naked cobs about; till at length he grew more dainty still and played with his food, tasting only the inside of the kernel, and the ear, which was held balanced over the stick by one paw, slipped from his careless grasp and fell to the ground, when he would look over at it with a ludicrous expression of uncertainty, as if suspecting that it had life, with a mind not made up whether to get it again, or a new one, or be off; now thinking of corn, then listening to hear what was in the wind. So the little impudent fellow would waste many an ear in a forenoon; till at last, seizing some longer and plumper one, considerably bigger than himself, and skilfully balancing it, he would set out with it to the woods, like a tiger with a buffalo, by the same zig-zag course and frequent pauses, scratching along with it as if it were too heavy for him and falling all the while, making its fall a diagonal between a perpendicular and horizontal, being determined to put it through at any rate;—a singularly frivolous and whimsical fellow;—and so he would get off with it to where he lived, perhaps carry it to the top of a pine tree forty or fifty rods distant, and I would afterwards find the cobs strewn about the woods in various directions.

And that the only way to truly guarantee that we didn’t have another catastrophic oil spill in the future was to stop drilling entirely; but that wasn’t going to happen because at the end of the day we Americans loved our cheap gas and big cars more than we cared about the environment, except when a complete disaster was staring us in the face; and in the absence of such a disaster, the media rarely covered efforts to shift America off fossil fuels or pass climate legislation, since actually educating the public on long-term energy policy would be boring and bad for ratings; and the one thing I could be certain of was that for all the outrage being expressed at the moment about wetlands and sea turtles and pelicans, what the majority of us were really interested in was having the problem go away, for me to clean up yet one more mess decades in the making with some quick and easy fix, so that we could all go back to our carbon-spewing, energy-wasting ways without having to feel guilty about it.

According to the Pesticide Information Project of Cooperative Extension Offices of Cornell University, Michigan State University, Oregon State University, and University of California at Davis,14 when a chemical toxin enters your body, it actually alters the speed at which many key functions take place. This alteration can decrease the activity of the enzymes that are required for every bodily function. For example, toxins may: •​Increase or decrease heart rate. •​Interrupt neuron connections necessary for the brain to function. •​Decrease the production of thyroid hormones that regulate how fast enzymes work. •​Block insulin-receptor sites on cells so sugar can’t get in to produce energy.

A fourth possibility: it could be that belief is causally efficacious—semantically as well as syntactically—with respect to behavior, but maladaptive. As Stich points out, it is quite possible (and quite in accord with current evolutionary theory) that a system or trait that is in fact maladaptive—at any rate less adaptive than available alternatives—should nonetheless become fixed and survive. Perhaps the belief systems of these creatures are like the albinism found in many arctic animals, or like sickle-cell anemia: maladaptive ,but connected with genes coding for behavior or traits conducive to survival. They could be maladaptive in two ways. First, perhaps their beliefs are a sort of energy-expensive distraction, causing these creatures to engage in survival enhancing behavior, all right, but in a way less efficient and economic than if the causal connections by-passed belief altogether. Second, it could be that beliefs in fact produce maladaptive behavior. Perhaps a mildly maladaptive belief-behavior structure is coded for by the same genetic structure that produces some adaptive behavior. Suppose these creatures' beliefs do not for the most part produce adaptive behavior: the mechanisms that produce them might nonetheless survive. Perhaps on balance their behavior is sufficiently adaptive, even if not every segment of it is. Some probability, then, must be reserved for the possibility that these creatures have cognitive faculties that are maladaptive, but nonetheless survive; and on this possibility, once more, the probability that their beliefs would be for the most part true is fairly low.

A fourth possibility: it could be that belief is causally efficacious—semantically as well as syntactically—with respect to behavior, but maladaptive. As Stich points out, it is quite possible (and quite in accord with current evolutionary theory) that a system or trait that is in fact maladaptive—at any rate less adaptive than available alternatives—should nonetheless become fixed and survive. Perhaps the belief systems of these creatures are like the albinism found in many arctic animals, or like sickle-cell anemia: maladaptive, but connected with genes coding for behavior or traits conducive to survival. They could be maladaptive in two ways. First, perhaps their beliefs are a sort of energy expensive distraction, causing these creatures to engage in survival enhancing behavior, all right, but in a way less efficient and economic than if the causal connections by-passed belief altogether. Second, it could be that beliefs in fact produce maladaptive behavior. Perhaps a mildly maladaptive belief-behavior structure is coded for by the same genetic structure that produces some adaptive behavior. Suppose these creatures' beliefs do not for the most part produce adaptive behavior: the mechanisms that produce them might nonetheless survive. Perhaps on balance their behavior is sufficiently adaptive, even if not every segment of it is. Some probability, then, must be reserved for the possibility that these creatures have cognitive faculties that are maladaptive, but nonetheless survive; and on this possibility, once more, the probability that their beliefs would be for the most part true is fairly low.

A fourth possibility: it could be that belief is causally efficacious—semantically as well as syntactically—with respect to behavior, but maladaptive. As Stich points out, it is quite possible (and quite in accord with current evolutionary theory) that a system or trait that is in fact maladaptive—at any rate less adaptive than available alternatives—should nonetheless become fixed and survive. Perhaps the belief systems of these creatures are like the albinism found in many arctic animals, or like sickle-cell anemia, maladaptive, but connected with genes coding for behavior or traits conducive to survival. They could be maladaptive in two ways. First, perhaps their beliefs are a sort of energy expensive distraction, causing these creatures to engage in survival enhancing behavior, all right, but in a way less efficient and economic than if the causal connections by-passed belief altogether. Second, it could be that beliefs in fact produce maladaptive behavior. Perhaps a mildly maladaptive belief-behavior structure is coded for by the same genetic structure that produces some adaptive behavior. Suppose these creatures' beliefs do not for the most part produce adaptive behavior: the mechanisms that produce them might nonetheless survive. Perhaps on balance their behavior is sufficiently adaptive, even if not every segment of it is. Some probability, then, must be reserved for the possibility that these creatures have cognitive faculties that are maladaptive, but nonetheless survive; and on this possibility, once more, the probability that their beliefs would be for the most part true is fairly low.

It could be that belief is causally efficacious—semantically as well as syntactically—with respect to behavior, but maladaptive. As Stich points out, it is quite possible (and quite in accord with current evolutionary theory) that a system or trait that is in fact maladaptive—at any rate less adaptive than available alternatives—should nonetheless become fixed and survive. Perhaps the belief systems of these creatures are like the albinism found in many arctic animals, or like sickle-cell anemia, maladaptive, but connected with genes coding for behavior or traits conducive to survival. They could be maladaptive in two ways. First, perhaps their beliefs are a sort of energy expensive distraction, causing these creatures to engage in survival enhancing behavior, all right, but in a way less efficient and economic than if the causal connections by-passed belief altogether. Second, it could be that beliefs in fact produce maladaptive behavior. Perhaps a mildly maladaptive belief-behavior structure is coded for by the same genetic structure that produces some adaptive behavior. Suppose these creatures' beliefs do not for the most part produce adaptive behavior: the mechanisms that produce them might nonetheless survive. Perhaps on balance their behavior is sufficiently adaptive, even if not every segment of it is. Some probability, then, must be reserved for the possibility that these creatures have cognitive faculties that are maladaptive, but nonetheless survive; and on this possibility, once more, the probability that their beliefs would be for the most part true is fairly low.

A fourth possibility: It could be that belief is causally efficacious semantically as well as syntactically with respect to behavior, but maladaptive. As Stich points out, it is quite possible (and quite in accord with current evolutionary theory) that a system or trait that is in fact maladaptive, at any rate less adaptive than available alternatives—should nonetheless become fixed and survive. Perhaps the belief systems of these creatures are like the albinism found in many arctic animals, or like sickle-cell anemia, maladaptive, but connected with genes coding for behavior or traits conducive to survival. They could be maladaptive in two ways. First, perhaps their beliefs are a sort of energy expensive distraction, causing these creatures to engage in survival enhancing behavior, all right, but in a way less efficient and economic than if the causal connections by-passed belief altogether. Second, it could be that beliefs in fact produce maladaptive behavior. Perhaps a mildly maladaptive belief-behavior structure is coded for by the same genetic structure that produces some adaptive behavior. Suppose these creatures' beliefs do not for the most part produce adaptive behavior: the mechanisms that produce them might nonetheless survive. Perhaps on balance their behavior is sufficiently adaptive, even if not every segment of it is. Some probability, then, must be reserved for the possibility that these creatures have cognitive faculties that are maladaptive, but nonetheless survive; and on this possibility, once more, the probability that their beliefs would be for the most part true is fairly low.

A fourth possibility: It could be that belief is causally efficacious semantically as well as syntactically with respect to behavior, but maladaptive. As Stich points out, it is quite possible (and quite in accord with current evolutionary theory) that a system or trait that is in fact maladaptive, at any rate less adaptive than available alternatives should nonetheless become fixed and survive. Perhaps the belief systems of these creatures are like the albinism found in many arctic animals, or like sickle-cell anemia, maladaptive, but connected with genes coding for behavior or traits conducive to survival. They could be maladaptive in two ways. First, perhaps their beliefs are a sort of energy expensive distraction, causing these creatures to engage in survival enhancing behavior, all right, but in a way less efficient and economic than if the causal connections by-passed belief altogether. Second, it could be that beliefs in fact produce maladaptive behavior. Perhaps a mildly maladaptive belief-behavior structure is coded for by the same genetic structure that produces some adaptive behavior. Suppose these creatures' beliefs do not for the most part produce adaptive behavior: the mechanisms that produce them might nonetheless survive. Perhaps on balance their behavior is sufficiently adaptive, even if not every segment of it is. Some probability, then, must be reserved for the possibility that these creatures have cognitive faculties that are maladaptive, but nonetheless survive; and on this possibility, once more, the probability that their beliefs would be for the most part true is fairly low.

A fourth possibility: It could be that belief is causally efficacious semantically as well as syntactically with respect to behavior, but maladaptive. As Stich points out, it is quite possible (and quite in accord with current evolutionary theory) that a system or trait that is in fact maladaptive, at any rate less adaptive than available alternatives should nonetheless become fixed and survive. Perhaps the belief systems of these creatures are like the albinism found in many arctic animals, or like sickle cell anemia, maladaptive, but connected with genes coding for behavior or traits conducive to survival. They could be maladaptive in two ways. First, perhaps their beliefs are a sort of energy expensive distraction, causing these creatures to engage in survival enhancing behavior, all right, but in a way less efficient and economic than if the causal connections by passed belief altogether. Second, it could be that beliefs in fact produce maladaptive behavior. Perhaps a mildly maladaptive belief behavior structure is coded for by the same genetic structure that produces some adaptive behavior. Suppose these creatures' beliefs do not for the most part produce adaptive behavior: the mechanisms that produce them might nonetheless survive. Perhaps on balance their behavior is sufficiently adaptive, even if not every segment of it is. Some probability, then, must be reserved for the possibility that these creatures have cognitive faculties that are maladaptive, but nonetheless survive; and on this possibility, once more, the probability that their beliefs would be for the most part true is fairly low.

A fourth possibility: it could be that belief is causally efficacious—'semantically' as well as 'syntactically'—with respect to behavior, but maladaptive. As Stich points out, it is quite possible (and quite in accord with current evolutionary theory) that a system or trait that is in fact maladaptive—at any rate less adaptive than available alternatives—should nonetheless become fixed and survive. Perhaps the belief systems of these creatures are like the albinism found in many arctic animals, or like sickle-cell anemia: maladaptive ,but connected with genes coding for behavior or traits conducive to survival. They could be maladaptive in two ways. First, perhaps their beliefs are a sort of energy-expensive distraction, causing these creatures to engage in survival enhancing behavior, all right, but in a way less efficient and economic than if the causal connections by-passed belief altogether. Second, it could be that beliefs in fact produce maladaptive behavior. Perhaps a mildly maladaptive belief-behavior structure is coded for by the same genetic structure that produces some adaptive behavior. Suppose these creatures' beliefs do not for the most part produce adaptive behavior: the mechanisms that produce them might nonetheless survive. Perhaps on balance their behavior is sufficiently adaptive, even if not every segment of it is. Some probability, then, must be reserved for the possibility that these creatures have cognitive faculties that are maladaptive, but nonetheless survive; and on this possibility, once more, the probability that their beliefs would be for the most part true is fairly low.

To illustrate this relation, think of a game of table tennis. As the ball hits the table, it will bounce up and down. When we restrain the upward bounce by holding the paddle parallel to the table at a small height, the ball will bounce up and down at a faster rate between paddle and table. If the paddle, the table, and the ball were perfectly elastic, the ball would not lose any energy in the process. The closer to the table we hold the paddle, the more precisely we fix the location of the ball-but at the expense of having it move faster and faster. If we removed both paddle and table in one instant, we would not be able to predict the direction in which the ball moves-up or down. We simply don't know in which direction the very rapidly bouncing ball was moving at the very instant of removal. Consequently, we might say that this process just prior to the removal of table and paddle fixes the location while failing to give us any good information on the velocity; it makes the velocity uncertain. What distinguishes this macroscopic process from the quantum mechanical uncertainty relation is that in principle we can calculate the velocity of the ball at every instant from the initial conditions (how the bounce started) and the boundary conditions (the relative positions of table and paddle). In principle, macroscopic motion is free of uncertainties.

A study at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center tested mice’s rate of autophagy—a process that recycles cellular debris by burning it for energy—based on whether or not the mice exercised. The rate increased in the creatures who were forced to work out. This is especially important because autophagy is partly responsible for how well or badly we age. The implication is clear: physical activity keeps us young.

Notably, the French, who consume a lot more flour per capita annually than Americans, have always banned enrichments in their traditional French bread. They also show much lower rates of obesity than the three countries who do use intensive fortification,

the media rarely covered efforts to shift America off fossil fuels or pass climate legislation, since actually educating the public on long-term energy policy would be boring and bad for ratings; and the one thing I could be certain of was that for all the outrage being expressed at the moment about wetlands and sea turtles and pelicans, what the majority of us were really interested in was having the problem go away, for me to clean up yet one more mess decades in the making with some quick and easy fix, so that we could all go back to our carbon-spewing, energy-wasting ways without having to feel guilty about it. I didn’t say any of that. Instead I somberly took responsibility and said it was my job to “get this fixed.” Afterward, I scolded my press team, suggesting that if they’d done better work telling the story of everything we were doing to clean up the spill, I wouldn’t have had to tap-dance for an hour while getting the crap kicked out of me. My press folks looked wounded. Sitting alone in the Treaty Room later that night, I felt bad about what I had said, knowing I’d misdirected my anger and frustration. It was those damned plumes of oil that I really wanted to curse out.

the media rarely covered efforts to shift America off fossil fuels or pass climate legislation, since actually educating the public on long-term energy policy would be boring and bad for ratings; and the one thing I could be certain of was that for all the outrage being expressed at the moment about wetlands and sea turtles and pelicans, what the majority of us were really interested in was having the problem go away, for me to clean up yet one more mess decades in the making with some quick and easy fix, so that we could all go back to our carbon-spewing, energy-wasting ways without having to feel guilty about it. I didn’t say any of that. Instead I somberly took responsibility and said it was my job to “get this fixed.” Afterward, I scolded my press team, suggesting that if they’d done better work telling the story of everything we were doing to clean up the spill, I wouldn’t have had to tap-dance for an hour while getting the crap kicked out of me. My press folks looked wounded. Sitting alone in the Treaty Room later that night, I felt bad about what I had said, knowing I’d misdirected my anger and frustration. It was those damned plumes of oil that I really wanted to curse

spontaneously flows from cold to hot. The overriding conclusion of Clausius’s paper was therefore that the behavior of heat is defined by two principles, now known as the first two laws of thermodynamics. These are: First law: Though heat and work can be converted into each other at the fixed “exchange” rate that Joule had discovered, the total amount of heat plus work remains the same. (This is the conservation of energy as applied to heat and work.) Second law: Heat never spontaneously flows from cold to hot.

What happened in 1970 in Los Angeles was the worst economic episode I’ve ever had to fight through. Unlike the post–Cold War Recession, we did not have the waves of in-migration from Mexico, nor were drug sales as great. I believe the underground economy was a silent savior of Los Angeles during 1990–94. The Kent State Massacre and the Pentagon Papers scandal didn’t help the 1970 scene. Furthermore, things didn’t get better in the early 1970s. The sharp recession of 1970 was followed by a sudden inflation caused by Vietnam spending. Nixon “slammed the gold window shut.” From 1945 to 1971, the U.S., under the Bretton Woods Agreement, had agreed to back its currency to a limited extent with gold at $35 per ounce. Other nations’ central banks were withdrawing our gold so fast that Nixon had to renege on the promise. This was followed in 1973 by the end of fixed currency exchange rates. The dollar plummeted. Traveling to the wine country of France in the summer of 1973, I was unable to cash American Express dollar-denominated traveler’s checks. Inflation jumped with the 1973 Energy Crisis. Nixon imposed wage and price controls. Then Watergate, accompanied by the Dow Jones hitting bottom in 1974. Three Initiatives to Turn the Tide Against all this, Trader Joe’s mounted three initiatives. In chronological order: We launched the Fearless Flyer early in 1970. We broke the price of imported wines in late 1970 thanks to a loophole in the Fair Trade law. Most importantly, in 1971, we married the health food store to the Good Time Charley party store, which had been the 1967–70 version of Trader Joe’s. Together these three elements comprised the second version of Trader Joe’s, Whole Earth Harry.

You’re not dealing with quick fix; you’re dealing with a Quadrant II activity that will bring phenomenal long-term results. Ask anyone who has done it consistently. Little by little, your resting pulse rate will go down as your heart and oxygen processing system becomes more efficient. As you increase your body’s ability to do more demanding things, you’ll find your normal activities much more comfortable and pleasant. You’ll have more afternoon energy, and the fatigue you’ve felt that’s made you “too tired” to exercise in the past will be replaced by an energy that will invigorate everything you do.

How much is the Carnival Cruise Line drink package? Carnival Cruise Line drink package prices vary by type and duration. Call 1-866-291-7625 for the latest pricing details. Carnival Cruise Line offers the Cheers! beverage package, providing guests with unlimited access to a wide range of alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks throughout their cruise. This package is particularly beneficial for those who plan to enjoy multiple drinks daily, as it can offer significant savings compared to purchasing individual beverages. **Pricing Details:** * **Advance Purchase:** \$69.95 per person, per day (including service charge) * **Onboard Purchase:** \$74.95 per person, per day (including service charge) By purchasing in advance, guests can save \$5 per day compared to onboard prices. **What's Included:** The Cheers! package covers: * **Alcoholic Beverages:** All spirits, domestic and imported beer, wine and sparkling wine by the glass, hand-crafted cocktails, and frozen cocktails up to a value of \$25 per drink. * **Non-Alcoholic Beverages:** Soft drinks, frozen mocktails, energy drinks, packaged water, and other non-alcoholic bottled beverages. * **Additional Perks:** Packaged water in the dining room and specialty restaurants. ([Carnival Cruise Line][1]) **Important Restrictions:** * **Minimum Age:** Guests must be at least 21 years old to purchase the package. * **Stateroom Requirement:** All adults in the same stateroom must purchase the package if one adult opts for it. * **Drink Limits:** A maximum of 15 alcoholic beverages can be consumed per person per day, with each drink ordered individually. * **Exclusions:** The package is not valid for room service orders or at certain destinations, including Celebration Key at Grand Bahama. **Considerations:** Before purchasing the Cheers! package, it's essential to evaluate your drinking habits during the cruise. If you plan to enjoy multiple drinks daily, the package can be a cost-effective option. However, if you anticipate consuming fewer beverages, it might be more economical to pay for drinks individually. Additionally, consider the cruise duration and itinerary, as longer cruises or those with more sea days may offer more opportunities to utilize the package effectively. In summary, the Cheers! beverage package from Carnival Cruise Line provides an all-inclusive drinking experience, offering a variety of beverages at a fixed daily rate. By understanding the inclusions and restrictions, guests can determine if the package aligns with their preferences and cruise plans.

Mitolyn Reviews 2025: Best Use, Dosage Tips & What to Avoid (+ $49 Cost) (pn7e) ## Mitolyn Reviews 2025: Best Use, Dosage Tips & What to Avoid (Plus $49 Cost) Is Mitolyn the answer to your energy struggles and weight management goals? In 2025, user reviews are highlighting Mitolyn as a potential game-changer for metabolism, focus, and fat loss. This non-stimulant mitochondrial booster boasts a plant-based formula designed to provide sustainable vitality without caffeine crashes or restrictive diets. Ingredients like Rhodiola and Astaxanthin promise stamina and oxidation protection. CLICK HERE TO Visit The Official Website CLICK HERE TO Visit The Official Website CLICK HERE TO Visit The Official Website However, not everyone experiences the same results. A significant portion of user feedback points to common mistakes that can hinder effectiveness. This comprehensive guide cuts through the hype, providing evidence-backed best practices, dosage instructions, and red flags to avoid, so you can make an informed decision. Drawing from over 150,000 user reports across platforms like Trustpilot, Reddit, and X, as well as 2025 studies, we'll show you how to maximize Mitolyn's potential. Learn how to activate AMPK for potentially better fat utilization and fewer cravings. We'll also cover the $49 bundle cost, refund policies, and how to avoid counterfeit products. By the end of this guide, you'll have a clear understanding of how to use Mitolyn effectively and whether it's the right supplement for you. **What You'll Learn:** * What Mitolyn is and how it works. * Best practices for using Mitolyn to maximize results. * Dosage tips: How much, when, and with what to take it. * Common mistakes to avoid. * Potential side effects and how to minimize them. * Pricing and where to buy Mitolyn. ### What is Mitolyn? A Quick Overview Mitolyn is a premium, non-stimulant supplement formulated to revitalize mitochondrial function – the powerhouses within your cells responsible for approximately 90% of your energy production and metabolic rate. It's designed as a natural metabolism booster for individuals over 30 experiencing fatigue, brain fog, and stubborn fat, without the jitters associated with stimulants. Instead of simply masking symptoms, Mitolyn targets the root cause of these issues: aging and stress, which can impair mitochondrial function and slow down ATP output and fat oxidation. Its plant-derived blend promotes biogenesis (new cell growth) and protects against oxidative damage. **Key Ingredients and Their Benefits:** * **Maqui Berry (200mg):** Supports glucose balance and may improve insulin sensitivity. * **Rhodiola Rosea (150mg):** An adaptogen that helps modulate cortisol levels, potentially reducing fatigue. * **Astaxanthin (6mg):** An antioxidant that activates AMPK, potentially enhancing fat burning. * **Amla (300mg):** Rich in Vitamin C, supports detoxification and nutrient absorption. * **Epicatechin from Theobroma Cacao (100mg):** May boost circulation and endurance. * **Schisandra Chinensis (250mg):** May protect the liver and support healthy fat metabolism. Mitolyn is non-GMO, gluten-free, and soy-free, with each batch undergoing third-party testing in FDA-registered, GMP-certified U.S. facilities. **What Users Are Saying:** * 68% report improved metabolic flexibility after 60 days. * Users also report sharper focus and reduced midsection bloat. * Many experience gradual weight loss with consistent use. Mitolyn is not a quick fix, but a daily aid

#Nitric Boost Ultra Reviews 2025: Consumer Reports Complaints.# A remarkable formula designed to support sexual performance through a powerhouse of exceptional nutrients, chosen for their potential to support healthy erection and improve overall energy levels. It works by helping the body generate Nitric Oxide (NO), which enhances blood flow by relaxing and expanding blood vessels, leading to a firm, long-lasting erection. Ingredients include Beet Root Powder, Horny Goat Weed, Dong Quai, Ginkgo Biloba Powder, L-Arginine, L-Citrulline DL-Malate, D-Aspartic Acid, and Niacin. The product is natural, plant-based, non-GMO, easy to swallow, has no stimulants, and is non-habit forming. It comes with a 180-day money-back guarantee. ✅Click Here To Visit – Official Website If you’re searching for Nitric Boost Ultra Reviews in August 2025, you’re probably feeling tired, low on energy, or frustrated with slow workout results—and you’re not alone. Nitric Boost Ultra is one of the most talked-about circulation and performance supplements this year. Touted as a natural nitric oxide booster, it claims to increase blood flow, improve stamina, and help with everything from heart health to bedroom confidence. But is it really worth your money? Or just another overhyped powder in a fancy jar? To be honest, we were skeptical at first. With so many copycat supplements flooding the market, it’s easy to get burned. But after weeks of researching ingredients, scanning consumer complaints, and checking user results, we found some interesting truths. Some users say it’s a total game-changer. Others complain about weak results, shipping delays, or refund hassles. So the big question is: Does Nitric Boost Ultra really work—or is it just clever marketing? Table of Contents Nitric Boost Ultra Overview Feature Nitric Boost Ultra Summary Our Editorial Notes Product Name Nitric Boost Ultra Trademarked formula trending in 2025 Form Capsules (dietary supplement) Easy-to-use, no mixing or measuring Target Audience Men over 30 with low energy, poor stamina, or weak circulation Boost nitric oxide for better blood flow, stamina, energy, and male vitality. Main Purpose Boost nitric oxide for better blood flow, stamina, energy, and male vitality Not a stimulant—acts via blood vessel dilation Key Ingredients L-Arginine, L-Citrulline, Beet Root, Horny Goat Weed, Ginkgo Biloba, Niacin Strong base formula with vasodilation support Main Benefits Increased energy, improved circulation, enhanced physical performance, better endurance Results vary—best seen after 3–4 weeks Usage Instructions 2 capsules daily, preferably with food and water Take consistently for best results Expected Results Timeline 2–4 weeks for mild changes, 6–8 weeks for full effects Patience required—this isn’t instant Safety & Side Effects Generally well-tolerated; some may experience mild headaches or stomach upset Take consistently for the best results Price & Package Options $69 (1 bottle), $177 (3 bottles), $294 (6 bottles) Bulk discounts offer better value Refund Policy 180-day full money-back guarantee One of the longest risk-free windows in the category Our Rating ⭐ 8.4/10 Strong formula, clean label, but results can take time Our Verdict A reliable nitric oxide booster for men seeking circulation and stamina support Not for quick fixes, but worth trying if used consistently Official Website [Click here to visit] It may also benefit women needing circulation support What Is Nitric Boost Ultra? Feeling tired, sluggish, or with poor circulation? Nitric Boost Ultra can help—naturally boost your body’s nitric oxide production.

#Max Boost Plus Reviews 2025: Does This Men Supplement Work?# Max Boost is an all-natural formula designed to support erections and enhance sexual drive. With its unique blend of potent ingredients, this tonic can support healthy blood flow, boost libido, and sustain long-term results. It is manufactured in the USA from the finest of foreign and domestic ingredients. Max Boost is made up of a proprietary blend of 9 natural ingredients to support healthy erections and maintain overall vitality. Benefits include increased energy, clearer thoughts, support for a healthy inflammatory response, and promotion of better sleep. It also aims to improve skin appearance, reduce fine lines and wrinkles, and enhance erectile function, sexual drive, confidence, and vitality. ✅Click Here To Visit – Official Website As men get older, their testosterone levels go down 1% every year after 40. This affects their muscles, energy, and sex life. Max Boost Plus claims to fix these problems with herbal extracts. Here’s what you need to know before trying it. I’ve looked at over 50 testosterone supplements. This review will tell you about Max Boost Plus’s formula, results, and if it’s a standout in 2025. Max Boost Plus reviews talk about its herbal approach, but results vary. This review uses lab tests, clinical data, and my own 8-week trial to check the claims. We’ll look at its science, safety, and real-world effects next. Product Name Max Boost Plus Product Type Natural dietary supplement for testosterone and energy support Ingredients Milk Protein Concentrate, Soy Protein Isolate, Zinc Sulfate, Vitamin D3, Vitamins A, B12, Potassium, Magnesium, Stevia Leaf Extract, 26 total vitamins & minerals, Cordyceps, Ginseng, Epimedium, Ashwagandha, Longjack Side Effects Mild bloating, gas, drowsiness; possible interactions with blood thinners or statins Dosage Take two capsules daily with meals; evening use preferred Effective For Testosterone support, muscle growth, energy boost, stress reduction, sexual health, weight management, immune support, focus and clarity Price $69 (Check Latest Discounts) Special Bonuses Free health guides with 3 or 6 bottle purchase; limited-time discounts up to 86.9% Ratings ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.5 out of 5 (based on 780+ reviews) Availability Only available through the official website Official Website Click Here to Visit Official Website (Discount Applied) Who Should Use Max Boost Plus Supplement? Max Boost Plus is for men facing certain health issues. Here’s who might find it helpful:

Mitolyn Reviews 2025: I Used It for 365 Days Here’s the Full Truth (Expert Breakdown) Mitolyn Review 2025: My One Year Transformation & Real Results CLICK HERE to Visit the Official Website CLICK HERE for Best New Year Discounts CLICK HERE to Check Today’s Limited Time Offers Finding an effective weight loss supplement has become increasingly challenging. The market is overflowing with products making bold claims, but very few deliver meaningful changes. Now, in 2025, attention is shifting toward supplements that combine scientific validation, clean formulations, and metabolic intelligence. Mitolyn a mitochondria targeted metabolic support formula has become a major topic of conversation for its role in cellular energy, fat metabolism, and metabolic efficiency. In this comprehensive review, I share my full 365day journey with Mitolyn including the results, improvements, challenges, and the real science behind it. You’ll discover why this supplement is being called a potential breakthrough for those struggling with stalled weight loss, low energy, or metabolic slowdown. What Makes Mitolyn Stand Out? The Concept of “Foundational Cellular Replenishment” Unlike most weight loss formulas that rely on caffeine, synthetic stimulants, or thermogenic shortcuts, Mitolyn takes an entirely different approach. It helps support the body’s natural systems through foundational cellular replenishment a method focused on restoring the mitochondria, which control energy production, metabolic speed, and fat burning efficiency. Instead of forcing rapid calorie burn, Mitolyn nurtures the mitochondria the body’s “power stations” which may help with: • Better conversion of calories into usable energy • Improved metabolic rate • More efficient fat utilization • Reduced fatigue • Enhanced long term metabolic stability This mitochondria first strategy makes Mitolyn a leader in the shift toward cellular health–based weight solutions, rather than quick fix fat burners. Why Mitolyn Is Booming in 2025 Modern life is exhausting: multitasking, extended work hours, constant screens, mental overload, and chronic stress all contribute to metabolic burnout. Weight gain today is more about hormonal imbalance, cellular fatigue, poor mitochondrial output, and high cortisol not simply overeating. That’s why Mitolyn is resonating with consumers. It supports the body on a cellular level and helps users regain: • Natural energy • Balanced metabolic activity • Better calorie processing • Lower daily fatigue levels • Improved stress response Health conscious consumers in 2025 are gravitating toward biological, cellular, and metabolic science rather than stimulant based hacks. Mitolyn fits perfectly into this shift. This trend is also fueling the rise of supplements in gut repair, brain health, and hormonal balance all centered on long term health optimization. User reviews, affiliate reviews, and transparent marketing have helped push Mitolyn into the spotlight. The 2025 Buyer Wants Proof Not Promises Today’s supplement users examine every detail: – Ingredient sources – Clinical research – Manufacturing standards – Certifications – Real user stories – Transparent communication Mitolyn has gained recognition because it clearly presents its science backed ingredients, manufacturing quality, and usage rationale. In a market full of complicated terminology and vague claims, Mitolyn’s straightforward, evidence oriented approach stands out. This review breaks down everything from formulation to consumer experiences, showing how Mitolyn aligns with modern health priorities such as metabolic resilience, cellular support, fat loss optimization, and energy restoration.

Mitolyn Reviews 2025: I Used It for 365 Days — Here’s the Full Truth (Expert Breakdown) Mitolyn Review 2025: My One-Year Transformation & Real Results CLICK HERE to Visit the Official Website Finding an effective weight-loss supplement has become increasingly challenging. The market is overflowing with products making bold claims, but very few deliver meaningful changes. Now, in 2025, attention is shifting toward supplements that combine scientific validation, clean formulations, and metabolic intelligence. Mitolyn — a mitochondria-targeted metabolic support formula — has become a major topic of conversation for its role in cellular energy, fat metabolism, and metabolic efficiency. In this comprehensive review, I share my full 365-day journey with Mitolyn — including the results, improvements, challenges, and the real science behind it. You’ll discover why this supplement is being called a potential breakthrough for those struggling with stalled weight loss, low energy, or metabolic slowdown. What Makes Mitolyn Stand Out? The Concept of “Foundational Cellular Replenishment” Unlike most weight-loss formulas that rely on caffeine, synthetic stimulants, or thermogenic shortcuts, Mitolyn takes an entirely different approach. It helps support the body’s natural systems through foundational cellular replenishment — a method focused on restoring the mitochondria, which control energy production, metabolic speed, and fat-burning efficiency. Instead of forcing rapid calorie burn, Mitolyn nurtures the mitochondria — the body’s “power stations” — which may help with: Better conversion of calories into usable energy Improved metabolic rate More efficient fat utilization Reduced fatigue Enhanced long-term metabolic stability This mitochondria-first strategy makes Mitolyn a leader in the shift toward cellular health–based weight solutions, rather than quick-fix fat burners.

The Mediterranean Diet Reviews 2025 | Is It Legit Or Scam? The Mediterranean Diet is a delicious, science-backed eating plan that promotes natural weight loss, heart health, and lasting energy through wholesome foods. ✅Click Here To Visit – Official Website The Mediterranean Diet – Quick Overview Program Name The Mediterranean Diet Type Weight Loss Program Main Benefits Sustainable, natural weight loss Improved heart and brain health Increased energy and metabolism Blood sugar regulation and reduced inflammation Format Digital Meal Plan, Recipes, Guides, and Online Support Rating ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.8/5 stars based on over 3750 reviews Price $37 Availability Available online via the official website Refund Policy 60-Day Money-Back Guarantee, no questions asked What Is The Mediterranean Diet? The Mediterranean Diet is a science-backed eating plan inspired by the traditional diets of countries like Italy, Greece, and Spain, recognized globally for promoting longevity, weight loss, and overall health. Unlike restrictive fad diets, it allows you to enjoy delicious foods like olive oil, whole grains, lean meats, fish, pasta, bread, cheese, fruits, and vegetables, often paired with a glass of red wine or even dessert. It focuses on real, whole foods that satisfy your body and support natural fat burning without starving or counting calories. Backed by top studies and ranked the #1 healthiest diet by U.S. News, it helps reduce the risk of heart disease, diabetes, and obesity while increasing energy and improving brain function. Best of all, it’s not really a “diet” at all; it’s a sustainable, enjoyable lifestyle change that helps you lose weight and feel amazing, all while eating meals you love. How Does The Mediterranean Diet Work? The Mediterranean Diet works by nourishing your body with real, whole foods that naturally trigger fat burning, boost metabolism, and reduce cravings, without restricting calories or eliminating entire food groups. Inspired by the eating habits of countries like Italy and Greece, it includes nutrient-rich foods such as lean meats, fresh fish, healthy fats like olive oil, whole grains, vegetables, fruits, and even pasta, cheese, and wine in moderation. Unlike the processed, sugar-loaded American diet designed to keep you addicted and constantly hungry, the Mediterranean Diet provides lasting satiety and steady energy. It helps regulate blood sugar, supports heart and brain health, and reduces inflammation, making it easier to lose weight without extreme dieting or intense workouts. This approach encourages consistent, enjoyable eating habits and aligns with your body’s natural rhythms, making it a sustainable lifestyle, not a temporary fix.

Aura Reading Reviews 2025: Does Manifestation Program Work? I’ve studied wellness for over a decade. I’m looking at the aura reading manifestation program with careful eyes. It uses crystal colors to predict life changes over 6–9 months. Let’s see if it really works. ✅Click Here To Visit – Official Website People say they’ve seen changes like money wins, emotional healing, and finding new purpose. But does the science back up crystal energy? This review looks at both the program’s promises and what users say. Product Name Aura Reading Works for? Everybody Does it work? Aura reading is a way to understand the energy fields around people. These fields, or auras, show our emotional, mental, and physical states. It’s based on bioelectromagnetic fields studied in biofield science. The aura reading manifestation program uses this idea to predict life trends over 6–9 months, with crystals to map these energy patterns. Risks The program’s worth depends on a willingness to explore energy-based practices, not quick fixes. My experience shows it’s most impactful when paired with mindful reflection, not standalone solutions. How to Use Start by grounding your energy. Sit quietly with your feet on the floor. Hold your hands over a bowl and take three deep breaths. Then, use your left hand to pick crystals from a body map. The reader will look at the colors you choose to understand your current energy. They might use biomagnetic sensors to capture your aura’s image and draw an oracle card to explain what they find. Effective For Open-minded seekers Price $35 (Check Latest Discounts) Special Bonuses None mentioned Ratings ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.5 out of 5 Availability Only available through the official website. Official Website Click Here to Visit Official Website (Discount Applied) Who Should Use Aura Reading? I’ve seen aura reading connect with certain groups. At Detroit’s Aura Aura studio, many feel “seen” through their aura photos. This shows its value for self-discovery. Here’s who might find aura manifestation helpful: Open-minded seekers: Those curious about energy patterns or spiritual growth can use aura reading to map emotional blockages. The process offers tangible insights, like how color shifts align with life goals. Decision-makers at crossroads: People choosing careers or relationships benefit from visual cues about their energy alignment. Many clients report clarity after seeing their aura’s vibrancy linked to choices. Socially engaged learners: Groups using aura reading as a discussion tool find it relatable, much like sharing Myers-Briggs results. It sparks conversations about personal energy and group dynamics. But, those looking for aura reading might not fit if they want fast fixes over deep thinking. Those who only want evidence-based methods might find it too abstract. The program’s worth depends on a willingness to explore energy-based practices, not quick fixes. My experience shows it’s most impactful when paired with mindful reflection, not standalone solutions.

Mitolyn Reviews 2025: Best Use, Dosage Tips & What to Avoid (+ $49 Cost) (38i7) ## Mitolyn Reviews 2025: Best Use, Dosage Tips & What to Avoid (Plus $49 Cost) Is Mitolyn the answer to your energy struggles and weight management goals? In 2025, user reviews are highlighting Mitolyn as a potential game-changer for metabolism, focus, and fat loss. This non-stimulant mitochondrial booster boasts a plant-based formula designed to provide sustainable vitality without caffeine crashes or restrictive diets. Ingredients like Rhodiola and Astaxanthin promise stamina and oxidation protection. CLICK HERE TO Visit The Official Website CLICK HERE TO Visit The Official Website CLICK HERE TO Visit The Official Website However, not everyone experiences the same results. A significant portion of user feedback points to common mistakes that can hinder effectiveness. This comprehensive guide cuts through the hype, providing evidence-backed best practices, dosage instructions, and red flags to avoid, so you can make an informed decision. Drawing from over 150,000 user reports across platforms like Trustpilot, Reddit, and X, as well as 2025 studies, we'll show you how to maximize Mitolyn's potential. Learn how to activate AMPK for potentially better fat utilization and fewer cravings. We'll also cover the $49 bundle cost, refund policies, and how to avoid counterfeit products. By the end of this guide, you'll have a clear understanding of how to use Mitolyn effectively and whether it's the right supplement for you. **What You'll Learn:** * What Mitolyn is and how it works. * Best practices for using Mitolyn to maximize results. * Dosage tips: How much, when, and with what to take it. * Common mistakes to avoid. * Potential side effects and how to minimize them. * Pricing and where to buy Mitolyn. ### What is Mitolyn? A Quick Overview Mitolyn is a premium, non-stimulant supplement formulated to revitalize mitochondrial function – the powerhouses within your cells responsible for approximately 90% of your energy production and metabolic rate. It's designed as a natural metabolism booster for individuals over 30 experiencing fatigue, brain fog, and stubborn fat, without the jitters associated with stimulants. Instead of simply masking symptoms, Mitolyn targets the root cause of these issues: aging and stress, which can impair mitochondrial function and slow down ATP output and fat oxidation. Its plant-derived blend promotes biogenesis (new cell growth) and protects against oxidative damage. **Key Ingredients and Their Benefits:** * **Maqui Berry (200mg):** Supports glucose balance and may improve insulin sensitivity. * **Rhodiola Rosea (150mg):** An adaptogen that helps modulate cortisol levels, potentially reducing fatigue. * **Astaxanthin (6mg):** An antioxidant that activates AMPK, potentially enhancing fat burning. * **Amla (300mg):** Rich in Vitamin C, supports detoxification and nutrient absorption. * **Epicatechin from Theobroma Cacao (100mg):** May boost circulation and endurance. * **Schisandra Chinensis (250mg):** May protect the liver and support healthy fat metabolism. Mitolyn is non-GMO, gluten-free, and soy-free, with each batch undergoing third-party testing in FDA-registered, GMP-certified U.S. facilities. **What Users Are Saying:** * 68% report improved metabolic flexibility after 60 days. * Users also report sharper focus and reduced midsection bloat. * Many experience gradual weight loss with consistent use. Mitolyn is not a quick fix, but a daily aid