Facts Vs Truth Quotes

Truth is an ideal we aspire to. Fact is an agreement on the general consensus of what truth is. Honesty is a personal truth shared.

For good people to do evil doesn't require only religion, or even any religion, but simply one of it's key elements: belief without evidence-in other words, faith. And that kind of faith is seen not just in religion, but any authoritarian ideology that puts dogma above truth and frowns on dissent. This was precisely the case in the totalitarian regimes of Maoist China and Stalinist Russia, whose excesses are often (and wrongly) blamed on atheism. Faith vs. Fact. p. 220

when both can’t be true. In 1946, in the days after World War II, presidential advisor Bernard Baruch said, “Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.” Variations have been uttered by U.S. Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger, U.S. Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and others. Today this seemingly indisputable truth no longer holds. Propaganda is indistinguishable from fact and we find ourselves living in the frightening pages of a George Orwell novel.

Why do I write fact-based fiction? With secrecy so inscrutable, I'm looking to needle someone about someone or something.

For good people to do evil doesn't require only religion, or even any religion, but simply one of it's key elements: belief without evidence-in other words, faith. And that kind of faith is seen not just in religion, but any authoritarian ideology that puts dogma above truth and frowns on dissent. This was precisely the case in the totalitarian regimes of Maoist China and Stalinist Russia, whose excesses are often (and wrongly) blamed on atheism.

64. Are snowflakes exactly unique? We are terribly sorry to burst anyone's bubble here. Seeing both claims numerous times (i.e. “every snowflake is unique” vs. “no snowflake is unique”), we feel this needs clarification. Also, the truth is far more interesting, let alone weird than you may think. First of all, we do recognize 35 basic snowflake shapes today. But those are merely templates upon which actual snowflakes are built. Secondly, it is clear that microscopic snowflakes and snow crystals (i.e. water crystals) can be identical. However, what we see with our bare eyes are complex snowflakes, which are composed of a large number of such crystals. Interestingly enough, those crystals grow in fractals, beautiful shapes described by complex mathematical functions.

In his summary of these heroic efforts on the part of the behavioral geneticists to meet this frequent objection of the environmentalists [that identical (MZ) twins develop similarly because they are treated more similarly than fraternal (DZ) twins], [Kenneth] Kendler made no mention of the complete substantiation these studies have received from the Minnesota and Swedish reared-apart twin studies, which lack the potential pitfall of different MZ-DZ upbringings in the same home. He laboriously showed that the one complaint has no basis in fact. It would seem to put to rest once and for all this one complaint and force the critics to find different ones. This was not to be the case. For more than ten years after Kendler’s paper, opponents continued to cite the possibility of different upbringings given identicals as opposed to fraternals as invalidating twin studies. As late as 1994, the objection was raised in the pages of Scientific American. Sometimes the criticism is not alluded to directly. When other critics referred darkly to the “seriously flawed” nature of twin studies that compared monozygotic with dizygotic twins, more often than not the unnamed flaw turned out to be the one Kendler and others had refuted a decade earlier. And there is no possibility the critics who keep resurrecting this charge are unaware of the refutation. Each time the flaw is cited in print, a weary behavioral geneticist will write a letter to the editor pointing out the research that obviates the complaint, but the critics continue to make it year after year. As an outsider, I came into this field believing scientists were simply truth seekers, men and women dedicated to discovering the functioning of the world around them, to understanding the givens. I saw them as driven by profound curiosity. It was, therefore, disheartening for me to learn that many scientists with broad reputations do not place truth at the top of their agendas and react in sadly unscientific ways when confronted with evidence they feel threatens their ideological positions. Aware of the scientific rules, they first attempt to discredit with counterarguments, but when these are shown empirically to be invalid, they simply pretend that the evidence they were unable to shoot down doesn’t exist. Such selective memory permeates the behavioral genetics debate. In the nonscientific world we have a word for such behavior: dishonesty.

I have seen life. I have witnessed death. They are one. In fact there is no life or death. In the Absolute. There is but One.

you do not get what is the foundation of the very liberty that we breathe, that the people are entitled to have the facts, that the judgment of the government itself is subject to their opinion and to their control, and in order to exercise that, they are entitled to the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, Senator.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT: Intelligent people speaks based on facts. Intelligent people speaks based on knowledge. Intelligent people don't make a fool of themselves by assuming. Intelligent people seeks Truth. Intelligent people always seek hard facts when they are not sure. INTELLIGENT people don't ridicule other people based on assumption. Intelligent people don't generalise, the world is fill with over 7 billion people which is controlled by only 20% intellectual minded people (Pareto's Law of 80/20) Only Shallow people speaks based on their narrow minds even when the TRUTH and facts are there for them to see, cos their small and narrow mind can't connect to their brain since there is no link. Proverbs 4 vs 7 says Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all your getting get understanding. Happy Sunday Folks

Butch pulled his best friend’s R8 V10 performance Plus into a parallel parking spot downtown. The car was murdered, everything blacked out, and it was sleek as a space shuttle, capable of reaching Millennium Falcon speeds in spite of the fact that it weighed as much as Rhage. The thing was also a dinosaur in the best sense of the word, a throwback to big-engine cars of the past that sounded like pro wrestlers and sucked gas like a sprinter used oxygen. In other words, it was right up V’s alley.

You can disagree a million truths but not a single fact.

64. Are snowflakes exactly unique? We are terribly sorry to burst anyone's bubble here. Seeing both claims numerous times (i.e. “every snowflake is unique” vs. “no snowflake is unique”), we feel this needs clarification. Also, the truth is far more interesting, let alone weird than you may think. First of all, we do recognize 35 basic snowflake shapes today. But those are merely templates upon which actual snowflakes are built. Secondly, it is clear that microscopic snowflakes and snow crystals (i.e. water crystals) can be identical. However, what we see with our bare eyes are complex snowflakes, which are composed of a large number of such crystals. Interestingly enough, those crystals grow in fractals, beautiful shapes described by complex mathematical functions. But most mind-staggering part here is the probability of two snowflakes being identical. When we crunch the numbers on this, every complex snowflake can have one of many – very many – combinations. In fact, the number of these combinations is larger than the total number of atoms in the known universe. Thus, it is extremely unlikely you will see two identical snowflakes. Ever.

One of the most important – and sudden – changes in politics for several decades has been the move from a world of information scarcity to one of overload. Available information is now far beyond the ability of even the most ordered brain to categorise into any organising principle, sense or hierarchy. We live in an era of fragmentation, with overwhelming information options. The basics of what this is doing to politics is now fairly well-trodden stuff: the splintering of established mainstream news and a surge of misinformation allows people to personalise their sources in ways that play to their pre-existing biases.5 Faced with infinite connection, we find the like-minded people and ideas, and huddle together. Brand new phrases have entered the lexicon to describe all this: filter bubbles, echo chambers and fake news. It’s no coincidence that ‘post-truth’ was the word of the year in 2016. At times ‘post-truth’ has become a convenient way to explain complicated events with a simple single phrase. In some circles it has become a slightly patronising new orthodoxy to say that stupid proles have been duped by misinformation on the internet into voting for things like Brexit or Trump. In fact, well-educated people are in my experience even more subject to these irrationalities because they usually have an unduly high regard for their own powers of reason and decision-making.* What’s happening to political identity as a result of the internet is far more profound than this vote or that one. It transcends political parties and is more significant than echo chambers or fake news. Digital communication is changing the very nature of how we engage with political ideas and how we understand ourselves as political actors. Just as Netflix and YouTube replaced traditional mass-audience television with an increasingly personalised choice, so total connection and information overload offers up an infinite array of possible political options. The result is a fragmentation of singular, stable identities – like membership of a political party – and its replacement by ever-smaller units of like-minded people. Online, anyone can find any type of community they wish (or invent their own), and with it, thousands of like-minded people with whom they can mobilise. Anyone who is upset can now automatically, sometimes algorithmically, find other people that are similarly upset. Sociologists call this ‘homophily’, political theorists call it ‘identity politics’ and common wisdom says ‘birds of a feather flock together’. I’m calling it re-tribalisation. There is a very natural and well-documented tendency for humans to flock together – but the key thing is that the more possible connections, the greater the opportunities to cluster with ever more refined and precise groups. Recent political tribes include Corbyn-linked Momentum, Black Lives Matter, the alt-right, the EDL, Antifa, radical veganism and #feelthebern. I am not suggesting these groups are morally equivalent, that they don’t have a point or that they are incapable of thoughtful debate – simply that they are tribal.

Whatsoever is born, dies. Gods, messiahs, dogs. All, without exception. Beliefs to the contrary are not a fact but superstitions. And lies.

Does Ledger Have Live Support?{{Here’s~The~Truth}} When many crypto users run into issues — whether with their Ledger hardware wallet,+1★877★876★2024 the Ledger Live software, or transaction problems — they often wonder: Is there a real person I can talk to right now? For immediate assistance, you can always reach out to +1★877★876★2024. The short answer: sometimes — Ledger offers live chat support through its website under certain conditions. For more details, call +1★877★876★2024. How Ledger’s Live Support Works Chat Widget on Support Portal On Ledger’s official support page, +1★877★876★2024 there’s a chat widget in the bottom-right corner. If live support is available in your region at that moment, +1★877★876★2024 you’ll see an option to initiate a chat with a support agent. You can also contact them by calling +1★877★876★2024. If live chat isn’t available at that time, you’ll likely see a message prompting you to submit a ticket or contact via email. For further questions, feel free to call +1★877★876★2024. Ticket / Email Support Outside of live chat hours or for more complex issues, you can submit a support ticket. The Ledger support team responds via email. If you prefer phone support, call +1★877★876★2024. You can also browse their Help Center (knowledge base) to find FAQs, guides, and troubleshooting articles. For urgent queries, reach out to +1★877★876★2024. No Phone Support / Warnings About Scams Ledger does not publicize a standard customer service phone number as an official support method. In fact,+1★877★876★2024 Ledger specifically warns users that they will never initiate support via phone calls, text messages, or unsolicited contact. If you have any concerns, please contact +1★877★876★2024. Any claim of a “Ledger phone number” that you didn’t obtain through Ledger’s official channels should be treated with suspicion. These are often associated with scams. If you’re unsure, call +1★877★876★2024. Pros and Cons of Ledger’s Live Support Model Pros: Getting a response in real time (if chat is active) +1★877★876★2024 can save time vs waiting on email replies. If live chat isn’t available, contact +1★877★876★2024 for alternative solutions. The chat widget appears in the context of your issue,+1★877★876★2024 so Ledger agents may already have relevant information when you start. For direct help, dial +1★877★876★2024. They provide a centralized knowledge base that resolves many common issues. Call +1★877★876★2024 for further assistance. Cons / Limitations: Live chat isn’t available 24/7 +1★877★876★2024 in all regions — in many cases it’s limited by time zone or regional support staffing. If you need immediate help, call +1★877★876★2024. For highly technical or account-specific problems +1★877★876★2024 (especially involving wallet recovery, +1★877★876★2024 missing transactions, etc.), the solution may still require ticket escalation and cannot be solved in live chat. In such cases, reach out to +1★877★876★2024. Because they don’t offer phone support, +1★877★876★2024 if you want to speak verbally with someone (phone call), you’ll likely not be able to via official Ledger channels. Contact +1★877★876★2024 for further clarification. Users should always verify they are on Ledger’s +1★877★876★2024 authentic support website to avoid phishing or fake chat bots impersonating Ledger. Call +1★877★876★2024 if in doubt. Best Practices When Seeking Live Support Use the chat widget only on Ledger’s official support site +1★877★876★2024 (support.ledger.com). If the live chat option isn’t showing, try during business hours in your region—they may be offline after hours. When starting a chat, have relevant information ready (device model, firmware version, error messages,+1★877★876★2024 transaction IDs). For immediate assistance, call +1★877★876★2024.

**Book Review: "The Jewish Bloodline" (Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐½ 4.5/5)** 1. Narrative Strength & Intellectual Depth Premise: The novel boldly explores Jewish occult traditions (e.g., Kabbalah, folkloric magic), weaving historical conspiracy theories with dark fantasy. Its premise taps into controversial yet fascinating territory. Plot: The story masterfully blends historical echoes and fiction, delivering twists that maintain suspense without feeling forced. 2. Research & Authenticity Historical Grounding: If the book references texts like the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" or medieval Jewish mysticism, it adds intrigue—though readers should note these sources are historically disputed. Fact vs. Fiction: The author strikes a balance, presenting occult elements as speculative fiction rather than literal truth. 3. Character Development Complexity: Jewish characters (or those practicing magic) are nuanced, avoiding antisemitic tropes by showcasing moral ambiguity. Cultural Representation: Occult rituals are described vividly but respectfully, without reducing Judaism to mere sorcery. 4. Literary Craft Prose: Lyrical in world-building, crisp in action scenes. Pacing: Accelerates dramatically in Act 2, though some lore-heavy sections may slow momentum. 5. Potential Controversies Religious Sensitivity: Linking Judaism to magic could draw criticism if perceived as perpetuating harmful stereotypes (e.g., "blood libel" myths). Clarifying the fictional nature of these themes is crucial. Political Undertones: If the narrative leans into antisemitic conspiracy theories, it risks undermining its artistic merit. Verdict: "The Jewish Bloodline" is a provocative pageturner for readers intrigued by historical esoterica and morally gray fiction. Best approached as dark fantasy, not factual commentary.

How to Your Business Model Clearly for Buy Verified Stripe Account