Evolution Of Media Quotes

[..]Although personally, I think cyberspace means the end of our species." Yes? Why is that?" Because it means the end of innovation," Malcolm said. "This idea that the whole world is wired together is mass death. Every biologist knows that small groups in isolation evolve fastest. You put a thousand birds on an ocean island and they'll evolve very fast. You put ten thousand on a big continent, and their evolution slows down. Now, for our own species, evolution occurs mostly through our behaviour. We innovate new behaviour to adapt. And everybody on earth knows that innovation only occurs in small groups. Put three people on a committee and they may get something done. Ten people, and it gets harder. Thirty people, and nothing happens. Thirty million, it becomes impossible. That's the effect of mass media - it keeps anything from happening. Mass media swamps diversity. It makes every place the same. Bangkok or Tokyo or London: there's a McDonald's on one corner, a Benetton on another, a Gap across the street. Regional differences vanish. All differences vanish. In a mass-media world, there's less of everything except the top ten books, records, movies, ideas. People worry about losing species diversity in the rain forest. But what about intellectual diversity - our most necessary resource? That's disappearing faster than trees. But we haven't figured that out, so now we're planning to put five billion people together in cyberspace. And it'll freeze the entire species. Everything will stop dead in its tracks. Everyone will think the same thing at the same time. Global uniformity. [..]

Human beings were never meant to participate in a worldwide social network comprised of billions of people. We were designed by evolution to be hunter-gatherers, with the mental capacity to interact and socialize with the other members of our tribe—a tribe made up of a few hundred other people at most. Interacting with thousands or even millions of other people on a daily basis was way too much for our ape-descended melons to handle. That was why social media had been gradually driving the entire population of the world insane since it emerged back around the turn of the century.

Pastor Ted and other evangelical pastors I hear about in the media seem to perceive just about everything to be a threat against Christianity. Evolution is a threat. Gay marriage is a threat. A swear word uttered accidentally on television is a threat. Democrats are a threat. And so on. I don't see how any of these things pose a threat against Christianity. If someone disagrees with you about politics, or social issues, or the matter of origins, isn't that just democracy and free speech in action? How do opposing viewpoints constitute a threat?

If you accept the existence of advertising, you accept a system designed to persuade and to dominate minds by interfering in people's thinking patterns. You also accept that the system will be used by the sorts of people who like to influence people and are good at it. No person who did not wish to dominate others would choose to use advertising, or choosing it, succeed in it. So the basic nature of advertising and all technologies created to serve it will be consistent with this purpose, will encourage this behaviour in society, and will tend to push social evolution in this direction.

After reading the news, I go on Twitter. I don't have an account but I find it interesting - all the different voices, the squabbles, the arrogance of certainty, the ignorance, the occasional, but wonderful, compassion, and watching the evolution of language head towards a new kind of hieroglyphics.

The church by and large is sitting back while we allow 15 percent of the population—the liberal media, college professors, and press—to undermine our faith and brainwash the next generation with their ungodly propaganda. Evolution, abortion, and the destruction of traditional marriage are deadly tares in the wheat field and poison in the drinking water.

Conspiracy theories and viral falsehoods are probably as old as language.

This is a book about a radical idea. An idea that’s long been known to make rulers nervous. An idea denied by religions and ideologies, ignored by the news media and erased from the annals of world history. At the same time, it’s an idea that’s legitimised by virtually every branch of science. One that’s corroborated by evolution and confirmed by everyday life.

Girls in virtual networks are subjected to hundreds of times more social comparison than girls had experienced for all of human evolution. They are exposed to more cruelty and bullying because social media platforms incentivize and facilitate relational aggression. Their openness and willingness to share emotions with other girls espouses them to depression and other disorders. The twisted incentive structures of social media reward the most extreme presentations of symptoms.

One word absent from a sentence, or misinterpreted incorrectly, can change the entire meaning of a sentence. One word can change the meaning of everything. Before you believe anything about God or anybody, ask yourself how well do you trust the transmitter, translator or interpreter. And if you have never met them, then how do you know if the knowledge you acquired is even right? One hundred and twenty-five years following every major event in history, all remaining witnesses will have died. How well do you trust the man who has stored his version of a story? And how can you put that much faith into someone you don't know?

I see no real evolution in media ecology beyond the “shape shifting” nature that seems to have been deliberately embedded in its fabric. The one thing that must, I think, always define a study we recognize as media ecological is its acknowledgement of the interactions of cultures – and the people who constitute those cultures – and their technologies.

such a social-media environment; it is merely the most recent and most efficient way that humans have found to scratch a prehistoric itch. The compelling nature of social media, then, can be traced back in part to the evolution of the social brain, as

Look everywhere. There are miracles and curiosities to fascinate and intrigue for many lifetimes: the intricacies of nature and everything in the world and universe around us from the miniscule to the infinite; physical, chemical and biological functionality; consciousness, intelligence and the ability to learn; evolution, and the imperative for life; beauty and other abstract interpretations; language and other forms of communication; how we make our way here and develop social patterns of culture and meaningfulness; how we organise ourselves and others; moral imperatives; the practicalities of survival and all the embellishments we pile on top; thought, beliefs, logic, intuition, ideas; inventing, creating, information, knowledge; emotions, sensations, experience, behaviour. We are each unique individuals arising from a combination of genetic, inherited, and learned information, all of which can be extremely fallible. Things taught to us when we are young are quite deeply ingrained. Obviously some of it (like don’t stick your finger in a wall socket) is very useful, but some of it is only opinion – an amalgamation of views from people you just happen to have had contact with. A bit later on we have access to lots of other information via books, media, internet etc, but it is important to remember that most of this is still just opinion, and often biased. Even subjects such as history are presented according to the presenter’s or author’s viewpoint, and science is continually changing. Newspapers and TV tend to cover news in the way that is most useful to them (and their funders/advisors), Research is also subject to the decisions of funders and can be distorted by business interests. Pretty much anyone can say what they want on the internet, so our powers of discernment need to be used to a great degree there too. Not one of us can have a completely objective view as we cannot possibly have access to, and filter, all knowledge available, so we must accept that our views are bound to be subjective. Our understanding and responses are all very personal, and our views extremely varied. We tend to make each new thing fit in with the picture we have already started in our heads, but we often have to go back and adjust the picture if we want to be honest about our view of reality as we continually expand it. We are taking in vast amounts of information from others all the time, so need to ensure we are processing that to develop our own true reflection of who we are.

All three media—genetic evolution, phenotypic plasticity, and memetic evolution—have contributed to the design of human consciousness, each in turn, and at increasing rates of speed.

The media tycoon Ted Turner told a newspaper reporter in 2010 that other countries should follow China’s lead in instituting a one-child policy to reduce global population over time.

The media tycoon Ted Turner told a newspaper reporter in 2010 that other countries should follow China’s lead in instituting a one-child policy to reduce global population over time. Malthus’s

Because complex animals can evolve their behavior rapidly. Changes can occur very quickly. Human beings are transforming the planet, and nobody knows whether it’s a dangerous development or not. So these behavioral processes can happen faster than we usually think evolution occurs. In ten thousand years human beings have gone from hunting to farming to cities to cyberspace. Behavior is screaming forward, and it might be nonadaptive. Nobody knows. Although personally, I think cyberspace means the end of our species.” “Yes? Why is that?” “Because it means the end of innovation,” Malcolm said. “This idea that the whole world is wired together is mass death. Every biologist knows that small groups in isolation evolve fastest. You put a thousand birds on an ocean island and they’ll evolve very fast. You put ten thousand on a big continent, and their evolution slows down. Now, for our own species, evolution occurs mostly through our behavior. We innovate new behavior to adapt. And everybody on earth knows that innovation only occurs in small groups. Put three people on a committee and they may get something done. Ten people, and it gets harder. Thirty people, and nothing happens. Thirty million, it becomes impossible. That’s the effect of mass media—it keeps anything from happening. Mass media swamps diversity. It makes every place the same. Bangkok or Tokyo or London: there’s a McDonald’s on one corner, a Benetton on another, a Gap across the street. Regional differences vanish. All differences vanish. In a mass-media world, there’s less of everything except the top ten books, records, movies, ideas. People worry about losing species diversity in the rain forest. But what about intellectual diversity—our most necessary resource? That’s disappearing faster than trees. But we haven’t figured that out, so now we’re planning to put five billion people together in cyberspace. And it’ll freeze the entire species. Everything will stop dead in its tracks. Everyone will think the same thing at the same time. Global uniformity. Oh, that hurts. Are you done?” “Almost,” Harding said. “Hang on.” “And believe me, it’ll be fast. If you map complex systems on a fitness landscape, you find the behavior can move so fast that fitness can drop precipitously. It doesn’t require asteroids or diseases or anything else. It’s just behavior that suddenly emerges, and turns out to be fatal to the creatures that do it. My idea was that dinosaurs—being complex creatures—might have undergone some of these behavioral changes. And that led to their extinction.

On Rachel's show for November 7, 2012: Ohio really did go to President Obama last night. and he really did win. And he really was born in Hawaii. And he really is legitimately President of the United States, again. And the Bureau of Labor statistics did not make up a fake unemployment rate last month. And the congressional research service really can find no evidence that cutting taxes on rich people grows the economy. And the polls were not screwed to over-sample Democrats. And Nate Silver was not making up fake projections about the election to make conservatives feel bad; Nate Silver was doing math. And climate change is real. And rape really does cause pregnancy, sometimes. And evolution is a thing. And Benghazi was an attack on us, it was not a scandal by us. And nobody is taking away anyone's guns. And taxes have not gone up. And the deficit is dropping, actually. And Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction. And the moon landing was real. And FEMA is not building concentration camps. And you and election observers are not taking over Texas. And moderate reforms of the regulations on the insurance industry and the financial services industry in this country are not the same thing as communism. Listen, last night was a good night for liberals and for democrats for very obvious reasons, but it was also, possibly, a good night for this country as a whole. Because in this country, we have a two-party system in government. And the idea is supposed to be that the two sides both come up with ways to confront and fix the real problems facing our country. They both propose possible solutions to our real problems. And we debate between those possible solutions. And by the process of debate, we pick the best idea. That competition between good ideas from both sides about real problems in the real country should result in our country having better choices, better options, than if only one side is really working on the hard stuff. And if the Republican Party and the conservative movement and the conservative media is stuck in a vacuum-sealed door-locked spin cycle of telling each other what makes them feel good and denying the factual, lived truth of the world, then we are all deprived as a nation of the constructive debate about competing feasible ideas about real problems. Last night the Republicans got shellacked, and they had no idea it was coming. And we saw them in real time, in real humiliating time, not believe it, even as it was happening to them. And unless they are going to secede, they are going to have to pop the factual bubble they have been so happy living inside if they do not want to get shellacked again, and that will be a painful process for them, but it will be good for the whole country, left, right, and center. You guys, we're counting on you. Wake up. There are real problems in the world. There are real, knowable facts in the world. Let's accept those and talk about how we might approach our problems differently. Let's move on from there. If the Republican Party and the conservative movement and conservative media are forced to do that by the humiliation they were dealt last night, we will all be better off as a nation. And in that spirit, congratulations, everyone!

Presidential campaigns are on the verge of turning into media contests between master operators of the Internet. What once had been substantive debates about the content of governance will reduce candidates to being spokesmen for a marketing effort pursued by methods whose intrusiveness would have been considered only a generation ago the stuff of science fiction. The candidates’ main role may become fund-raising rather than the elaboration of issues. Is the marketing effort designed to convey the candidate’s convictions, or are the convictions expressed by the candidate the reflections of a “big data” research effort into individuals’ likely preferences and prejudices? Can democracy avoid an evolution toward a demagogic outcome based on emotional mass appeal rather than the reasoned process the Founding Fathers imagined?

New technologies are impacting consumer consumption and driving technological innovations in digital media, so if you want to remain relevant you must become comfortable with the ever-changing creative process.

A local historian later ventured that the Osage murder trials received more media coverage than the previous year’s Scopes “monkey trial,” in Tennessee, regarding the legality of teaching evolution in a state-funded school.

The universe, the landscape, it is all changing. It has not changed enough-that is a given- but it is changing, and evolution is something to embrace. Racism is alive and well and we still encounter microaggressions on a regular basis, bat at least now we can go home and close the door and enjoy some entertainment, see ourselves on-screen, imagine ourselves as superheroes and goddesses. Before, you got hassled, you went home, and you had nothing. That's the difference

New Rule: You don't have to teach both sides of a debate if one side is a load of crap. President Bush recently suggested that public schools should teach "intelligent design" alongside the theory of evolution, because after all, evolution is "just a theory." Then the president renewed his vow to "drive the terrorists straight over the edge of the earth." Here's what I don't get: President Bush is a brilliant scientist. He's the man who proved you could mix two parts booze with one part cocaine and still fly a jet fighter. And yet he just can't seem to accept that we descended from apes. It seems pathetic to be so insecure about your biological superiority to a group of feces-flinging, rouge-buttocked monkeys that you have to make up fairy tales like "We came from Adam and Eve," and then cover stories for Adam and Eve, like intelligent design! Yeah, leaving the earth in the hands of two naked teenagers, that's a real intelligent design. I'm sorry, folks, but it may very well be that life is just a series of random events, and that there is no master plan--but enough about Iraq. There aren't necessarily two sides to every issue. If there were, the Republicans would have an opposition party. And an opposition party would point out that even though there's a debate in schools and government about this, there is no debate among scientists. Evolution is supported by the entire scientific community. Intelligent design is supported by the guys on line to see The Dukes of Hazzard. And the reason there is no real debate is that intelligent design isn't real science. It's the equivalent of saying that the Thermos keeps hot things hot and cold things cold because it's a god. It's so willfully ignorant you might as well worship the U.S. mail. "It came again! Praise Jesus!" Stupidity isn't a form of knowing things. Thunder is high-pressure air meeting low-pressure air--it's not God bowling. "Babies come from storks" is not a competing school of throught in medical school. We shouldn't teach both. The media shouldn't equate both. If Thomas Jefferson knew we were blurring the line this much between Church and State, he would turn over in his slave. As for me, I believe in evolution and intelligent design. I think God designed us in his image, but I also think God is a monkey.

On the whole, I think the Darwinian theory of evolution, at least with the additional insights of modern genetics, gives us a fairly coherent account of the evolution of human life on earth. At the same time, I believe that karma can have a central role in understanding the origination of what Buddhism calls “sentience,” through the media of energy and consciousness.

7 The world that we have to deal with politically is out of reach, out of sight, out of mind. It has to be explored, reported, and imagined. Man is no Aristotelian god contemplating all existence at one glance. He is the creature of an evolution who can just about span a sufficient portion of reality to manage his survival, and snatch what on the scale of time are but a few moments of insight and happiness. Yet this same creature has invented ways of seeing what no naked eye could see, of hearing what no ear could hear, of weighing immense masses and infinitesimal ones, of counting and separating more items than he can individually remember. He is learning to see with his mind vast portions of the world that he could never see, touch, smell, hear, or remember. Gradually he makes for himself a trustworthy picture inside his head of the world beyond his reach.

One of the strengths of such a universal Panopticon is that the perils against which it protects are not all imaginary. The atrocity exhibitions that are on display in the media are not just fantasies. The most savage wars rage unabated; random violence can happen anywhere at any time. With the rapid evolution of techniques of cyber-attack, every modern amenity is vulnerable to sudden disruption. To assume that the inmates yearn to escape the universal Panopticon would be rash. Their worst fear may be of being forced to leave.

Human beings were never meant to participate in a worldwide social network comprised of billions of people. We were designed by evolution to be hunter-gatherers, with the mental capacity to interact and socialize with the other members of our tribe—a tribe made up of a few hundred other people at most. Interacting with thousands or even millions of other people on a daily basis was way too much for our ape-descended melons to handle. That was why social media had been gradually driving the entire population of the world insane since it emerged back around the turn of the century. I was even beginning to wonder if the invention of a worldwide social network was actually the “Great Filter” that theoretically caused all technological civilizations to go extinct, instead of nuclear weapons or climate change. Maybe every time an intelligent species grew advanced enough to invent a global computer network, they would then develop some form of social media, which would immediately fill these beings with such an intense hatred for one another that they ended up wiping themselves out within four or five decades. Only time would tell.

Myth Number 4: Social Media Is the Shiny New Thing. Two Years from Now, That Bubble Will Burst Yes, it is the shiny new thing. No, two years from now, that bubble will not burst. There is no bubble. What social media represents is an evolution in the field of communications, just as the Internet and mobility before it. The tools will change, the platforms will evolve, but the way in which people communicate with other people through digital networks and electronic devices has been fundamentally transformed through the development of social media. We did not grow tired of the telephone, of the...

Women who seek a lasting mate, for example, have at their disposal a wide range of tactics, including displays of loyalty, signals of common interests, and acts of intelligence. Women purchase beauty products not because they have been brainwashed by the media, but because they have determined that using beauty products will increase their power to get what they want. Women are not unsuspecting dupes manipulated by the forces of Madison Avenue, but determine through their preferences which products they will consume—products that they perceive will enhance their value as a mate, friend, or group member.

While some accused and convicted child molesters have inappropriately influenced the media, the public, and many in the clinical and legal professions by claiming that traumatic amnesia does not occur in child sexual abuse, workers in the field of trauma psychology have accumulated solid empirical evidence over the past 100 years that it does occur and is common. Its existence and natural history are documented throughout the clinical literature. from: Traumatic amnesia: The evolution of our understanding from a clinical and legal perspective, Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, Volume 4, Issue 2, 1997

I’d finally gained enough distance from my addiction to realize something. Human beings were never meant to participate in a worldwide social network comprised of billions of people. We were designed by evolution to be hunter-gatherers, with the mental capacity to interact and socialize with the other members of our tribe—a tribe made up of a few hundred other people at most. Interacting with thousands or even millions of other people on a daily basis was way too much for our ape-descended melons to handle. That was why social media had been gradually driving the entire population of the world insane since it emerged back around the turn of the century.

higher states of arousal come with decreased abilities to self-quiet. Elevated states of arousal are further coupled with a reduced ability to self-stimulate and self-entertain. This includes reduced abilities to observe, integrate information, and to be creative. In essence, we have less ability to sustain focus on the normal, the baseline, including states of observation, contemplation, and transitions from which ideas spark — what many under the age of twenty now consider a void, proclaiming boredom. We now feel agitated when not externally stimulated; we need to be occupied, entertained. We also have greater troubles quieting, including reaching states of repose, satisfaction, and restorative sleep.

This idea that the whole world is wired together is mass death. Every biologist knows that small groups in isolation evolve fastest. You put a thousand birds on an ocean island and they’ll evolve very fast. You put ten thousand on a big continent, and their evolution slows down. Now, for our own species, evolution occurs mostly through our behavior. We innovate new behavior to adapt. And everybody on earth knows that innovation only occurs in small groups. Put three people on a committee and they may get something done. Ten people, and it gets harder. Thirty people, and nothing happens. Thirty million, it becomes impossible. That’s the effect of mass media—it keeps anything from happening. Mass media swamps diversity. It makes every place the same. Bangkok or Tokyo or London: there’s a McDonald’s on one corner, a Benetton on another, a Gap across the street. Regional differences vanish. All differences vanish. In a mass-media world, there’s less of everything except the top ten books, records, movies, ideas. People worry about losing species diversity in the rain forest. But what about intellectual diversity—our most necessary resource? That’s disappearing faster than trees. But we haven’t figured that out, so now we’re planning to put five billion people together in cyberspace. And it’ll freeze the entire species. Everything will stop dead in its tracks. Everyone will think the same thing at the same time. Global uniformity. Oh, that hurts. Are

I’m talking about all the order in the natural world,” Malcolm said. “And how perhaps it can emerge fast, through crystallization. Because complex animals can evolve their behavior rapidly. Changes can occur very quickly. Human beings are transforming the planet, and nobody knows whether it’s a dangerous development or not. So these behavioral processes can happen faster than we usually think evolution occurs. In ten thousand years human beings have gone from hunting to farming to cities to cyberspace. Behavior is screaming forward, and it might be nonadaptive. Nobody knows. Although personally, I think cyberspace means the end of our species.” “Yes? Why is that?” “Because it means the end of innovation,” Malcolm said. “This idea that the whole world is wired together is mass death. Every biologist knows that small groups in isolation evolve fastest. You put a thousand birds on an ocean island and they’ll evolve very fast. You put ten thousand on a big continent, and their evolution slows down. Now, for our own species, evolution occurs mostly through our behavior. We innovate new behavior to adapt. And everybody on earth knows that innovation only occurs in small groups. Put three people on a committee and they may get something done. Ten people, and it gets harder. Thirty people, and nothing happens. Thirty million, it becomes impossible. That’s the effect of mass media—it keeps anything from happening. Mass media swamps diversity. It makes every place the same. Bangkok or Tokyo or London: there’s a McDonald’s on one corner, a Benetton on another, a Gap across the street. Regional differences vanish. All differences vanish. In a mass-media world, there’s less of everything except the top ten books, records, movies, ideas. People worry about losing species diversity in the rain forest. But what about intellectual diversity—our most necessary resource? That’s disappearing faster than trees. But we haven’t figured that out, so now we’re planning to put five billion people together in cyberspace. And it’ll freeze the entire species. Everything will stop dead in its tracks. Everyone will think the same thing at the same time. Global uniformity. Oh,

Human beings were never meant to participate in a worldwide social network comprised of billions of people. We were designed by evolution to be hunter-gatherers, with the mental capacity to interact and socialize with the other members of our tribe—a tribe made up of a few hundred other people at most. Interacting with thousands or even millions of other people on a daily basis was way too much for our ape-descended melons to handle. That was why social media had been gradually driving the entire population of the world insane since it emerged back around the turn of the century. I was even beginning to wonder if the invention of a worldwide social network was actually the “Great Filter” that theoretically caused all technological civilizations to go extinct, instead of nuclear weapons or climate change. Maybe every time an intelligent species grew advanced enough to invent a global computer network, they would then develop some form of social media, which would immediately fill these beings with such an intense hatred for one another that they ended up wiping themselves out within four or five decades.

I’d finally gained enough distance from my addiction to realize something. Human beings were never meant to participate in a worldwide social network comprised of billions of people. We were designed by evolution to be hunter-gatherers, with the mental capacity to interact and socialize with the other members of our tribe—a tribe made up of a few hundred other people at most. Interacting with thousands or even millions of other people on a daily basis was way too much for our ape-descended melons to handle. That was why social media had been gradually driving the entire population of the world insane since it emerged back around the turn of the century. I was even beginning to wonder if the invention of a worldwide social network was actually the “Great Filter” that theoretically caused all technological civilizations to go extinct, instead of nuclear weapons or climate change. Maybe every time an intelligent species grew advanced enough to invent a global computer network, they would then develop some form of social media, which would immediately fill these beings with such an intense hatred for one another that they ended up wiping themselves out within four or five decades.

Mosseri’s answer to the important question was perfect by Facebook standards: “Technology isn’t good or bad—it just is,” he wrote. “Social media is a great amplifier. We need to do all we can responsibly to magnify the good and address the bad.” But nothing “just is,” especially Instagram. Instagram isn’t designed to be a neutral technology, like electricity or computer code. It’s an intentionally crafted experience, with an impact on its users that is not inevitable, but is the product of a series of choices by its makers about how to shape behavior. Instagram trained its users on likes and follows, but that wasn’t enough to create the emotional attachment users have to the product today. They also thought about their users as individuals, through the careful curation of an editorial strategy, and partnerships with top accounts. Instagram’s team is expert at amplifying “the good.” When it comes to addressing “the bad,” though, employees are concerned the app is thinking in terms of numbers, not people. Facebook’s top argument against a breakup is that its “family of apps” evolution will be better for users’ safety. “If you want to prevent interference in elections, if you want to reduce[…]

When General Genius built the first mentar [Artificial Intelligence] mind in the last half of the twenty-first century, it based its design on the only proven conscious material then known, namely, our brains. Specifically, the complex structure of our synaptic network. Scientists substituted an electrochemical substrate for our slower, messier biological one. Our brains are an evolutionary hodgepodge of newer structures built on top of more ancient ones, a jury-rigged system that has gotten us this far, despite its inefficiency, but was crying out for a top-to-bottom overhaul. Or so the General genius engineers presumed. One of their chief goals was to make minds as portable as possible, to be easily transferred, stored, and active in multiple media: electronic, chemical, photonic, you name it. Thus there didn't seem to be a need for a mentar body, only for interchangeable containers. They designed the mentar mind to be as fungible as a bank transfer. And so they eliminated our most ancient brain structures for regulating metabolic functions, and they adapted our sensory/motor networks to the control of peripherals. As it turns out, intelligence is not limited to neural networks, Merrill. Indeed, half of human intelligence resides in our bodies outside our skulls. This was intelligence the mentars never inherited from us. ... The genius of the irrational... ... We gave them only rational functions -- the ability to think and feel, but no irrational functions... Have you ever been in a tight situation where you relied on your 'gut instinct'? This is the body's intelligence, not the mind's. Every living cell possesses it. The mentar substrate has no indomitable will to survive, but ours does. Likewise, mentars have no 'fire in the belly,' but we do. They don't experience pure avarice or greed or pride. They're not very curious, or playful, or proud. They lack a sense of wonder and spirit of adventure. They have little initiative. Granted, their cognition is miraculous, but their personalities are rather pedantic. But probably their chief shortcoming is the lack of intuition. Of all the irrational faculties, intuition in the most powerful. Some say intuition transcends space-time. Have you ever heard of a mentar having a lucky hunch? They can bring incredible amounts of cognitive and computational power to bear on a seemingly intractable problem, only to see a dumb human with a lucky hunch walk away with the prize every time. Then there's luck itself. Some people have it, most don't, and no mentar does. So this makes them want our bodies... Our bodies, ape bodies, dog bodies, jellyfish bodies. They've tried them all. Every cell knows some neat tricks or survival, but the problem with cellular knowledge is that it's not at all fungible; nor are our memories. We're pretty much trapped in our containers.

In the beginning, there was the internet: the physical infrastructure of wires and servers that lets computers, and the people in front of them, talk to each other. The U.S. government’s Arpanet sent its first message in 1969, but the web as we know it today didn’t emerge until 1991, when HTML and URLs made it possible for users to navigate between static pages. Consider this the read-only web, or Web1. In the early 2000s, things started to change. For one, the internet was becoming more interactive; it was an era of user-generated content, or the read/write web. Social media was a key feature of Web2 (or Web 2.0, as you may know it), and Facebook, Twitter, and Tumblr came to define the experience of being online. YouTube, Wikipedia, and Google, along with the ability to comment on content, expanded our ability to watch, learn, search, and communicate. The Web2 era has also been one of centralization. Network effects and economies of scale have led to clear winners, and those companies (many of which I mentioned above) have produced mind-boggling wealth for themselves and their shareholders by scraping users’ data and selling targeted ads against it. This has allowed services to be offered for “free,” though users initially didn’t understand the implications of that bargain. Web2 also created new ways for regular people to make money, such as through the sharing economy and the sometimes-lucrative job of being an influencer.

The Tale of Human Evolution The subject most often brought up by advocates of the theory of evolution is the subject of the origin of man. The Darwinist claim holds that modern man evolved from ape-like creatures. During this alleged evolutionary process, which is supposed to have started 4-5 million years ago, some "transitional forms" between modern man and his ancestors are supposed to have existed. According to this completely imaginary scenario, four basic "categories" are listed: 1. Australopithecus 2. Homo habilis 3. Homo erectus 4. Homo sapiens Evolutionists call man's so-called first ape-like ancestors Australopithecus, which means "South African ape." These living beings are actually nothing but an old ape species that has become extinct. Extensive research done on various Australopithecus specimens by two world famous anatomists from England and the USA, namely, Lord Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, shows that these apes belonged to an ordinary ape species that became extinct and bore no resemblance to humans. Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolution as "homo," that is "man." According to their claim, the living beings in the Homo series are more developed than Australopithecus. Evolutionists devise a fanciful evolution scheme by arranging different fossils of these creatures in a particular order. This scheme is imaginary because it has never been proved that there is an evolutionary relation between these different classes. Ernst Mayr, one of the twentieth century's most important evolutionists, contends in his book One Long Argument that "particularly historical [puzzles] such as the origin of life or of Homo sapiens, are extremely difficult and may even resist a final, satisfying explanation." By outlining the link chain as Australopithecus > Homo habilis > Homo erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionists imply that each of these species is one another's ancestor. However, recent findings of paleoanthropologists have revealed that Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus lived at different parts of the world at the same time. Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo erectus have lived up until very modern times. Homo sapiens neandarthalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens (modern man) co-existed in the same region. This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of the claim that they are ancestors of one another. Stephen Jay Gould explained this deadlock of the theory of evolution although he was himself one of the leading advocates of evolution in the twentieth century: What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. habilis), none clearly derived from another? Moreover, none of the three display any evolutionary trends during their tenure on earth. Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is "upheld" with the help of various drawings of some "half ape, half human" creatures appearing in the media and course books, that is, frankly, by means of propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific foundation. Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected scientists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years and studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded, despite being an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact, no such family tree branching out from ape-like creatures to man.

Ungodly influencers don’t just hold sway over the scientific establishment, but they also control the majority of the news media, entertainment media, education establishment, fact-checkers, search engines, social media, corporate leadership, book-publishing establishment, libraries, and every other place of influence and power.

How will the new haves and have-nots fight for resources, and how might such social disequilibrium ultimately play out? This battleground is important for industrialists and labor activists, as well as for economists and policymakers. Civic leaders, politicians, public intellectuals and media cannot continue to ignore the evolution of AI. More voices must enter

Careful research on the complex relationship between the electronic and print media and the evolution of the alien abduction phenomenon waits to be undertaken.

Even Mr. Masrani’s announcement of his plans to open a park had been shrouded in mystery. The man had a flair for drama. It started when packages containing amber-handled archaeological tools—the kind that paleontologists use to dig up bones—began arriving. At first, it was journalists, social media influencers, actors, pop stars, the leading professors and minds of the world. Then, as the buzz began to start, the tools began arriving at random people’s doorsteps across the world. Everyone starting talking about it because it was so weird—and the selection of people who got the tools was so broad and varied. The tools came with no note, just a simple card that had the profile of a T. rex skeleton stamped upon it. Two more packages arrived for the lucky recipients over the next few weeks. It became this status thing to post about them. Everyone was trying to trace the company that sent them, but no one could figure it out. The second package contained a compass; carved on the back was that same T. rex stamp. When the third and final package arrived, it caused a sensation. Each person’s box had three clues—a jagged tooth, a curled piece of parchment with the sketch of a gate in spidery ink, and an old-fashioned-looking key, one clearly not made to unlock anything. The speculation this caused throughout the world was unparalleled. What did these objects mean? Did they relate to each other? Was this just some elaborate prank? The first person to discover how to activate the boxes was a farmer’s son in Bolivia. After he disassembled the wooden box the trinkets were sent in, he noticed a strange indentation in the top of the lid and placed his key inside. Once he posted his discovery on YouTube, people across the globe were inserting their key in the notch, activating a hidden hologram chip embedded in the key’s handle. This beamed a message. Two silver words. One date. They’re coming. May 30, 2005 By the time Mr. Masrani held his press conference the next day, the entire world was buzzing about the possibility of a new park and a chance to get close to the dinosaurs. Both of the islands had been restricted for so long, it was the only thing anyone could talk about. It’s one of those things you compare notes on with other people: Where were you when Masrani announced Jurassic World?

Synthetic biology was the transistor of the twenty-first century. Yet political realities in America made it increasingly unfeasible for entrepreneurs there to tinker with the building blocks of life. Every cluster of human cells was viewed as a baby in America. A quarter of the population wasn’t vaccinated. A majority of Americans didn’t believe in evolution. Social-media-powered opinions carried more influence than peer-reviewed scientific research.

sobre Media Evolution bajo la supervisión de Neil Postman, un enfoque que luego ampliaría a partir de la emergencia de la World Wide Web (Levinson, 1979, 1997).

Begin rant: I think the internet, social media, smartphones, a progressive education system that teaches socialist values and the false theory of evolution based on an atheistic worldview, moral relativism and post-modern thought mixed with a rejection of biblical truth, social justice over true justice, the teaching that everyone gets a trophy, and that everyone is uniquely special and should desire fame, add to that helicopter parents, absentee parents, confusing parental messages, confusing family structures, gender identity politics, and the idea that this generation is somehow the most brilliant generation ever because they can google every answer or ask some AI-based computer speaker box, mixed with all the confusing heretical, blasphemous, and unbiblical models of the Church, and it’s no wonder these young people are so bent on doing their own thing and not listening to what seems to be hypocritical,

Men worldwide want physically attractive, young, and sexually loyal wives who will remain faithful to them over the long run. These preferences cannot be attributed to Western culture, to capitalism, to white Anglo-Saxon bigotry, to the media, or to incessant brainwashing by advertisers. They are universal across cultures and are absent in none.

Synchronous, face-to-face, physical interactions and rituals are a deep, ancient, and underappreciated part of human evolution. Adults enjoy them, and children need them for healthy development. Yet the major social media platforms draw children into endless hours of asynchronous interaction,

We are the result of millions of years of evolution, people died to offer us the chance to have a better life and here's what we did of it all ! We didn't even realized that freedom, nowadays, is nothing more than an illusion. We are the slaves of money, of economy, of lobbies, medias and time. Our thoughts and dreams are our only freedom.

But mass media, of course, is about drama and unfolding stories, and every dramatist knows that without conflict, you have no story. And so the natural world has been dressed up as a vast and violent landscape of competition-the ultimate reality show, where real blood can be shed. Can the antelope corner tighter than the lion? Can the species survive? Will the "balance of nature" be upset? Television has taken Tennyson to heart, portraying nature as "red in tooth and claw," a world of savage predation, where survival of the fittest is the primary law.

At this point in YouTube’s evolution, it might have made sense for Mr. Page to bring in a seasoned media executive to run the company. But Google typically prefers to recruit its leaders from inside.

Instead, the best way to think of social media is as another layer in natural human language. Social media — or digitally enhanced conversation — is really just part of the evolution in human conversation.

another person’s behalf? Aren’t you also thankful that others have summoned Him on yours? Our homes today are threatened by fevers of all sorts—far beyond the physiological: unresolved conflict, unforgiveness, unfaithfulness, compromising media communications, pornography, and more. We need Jesus in our homes. Do you have a sense of Christ’s activity in your home? I’ve a good reason for asking you this question. Almost every spiritual marker of Christ’s heightened activity in my home came as a direct result of some threatening situation. Right now both my daughters are walking with God, but I assure you this did not simply happen in the natural evolution of their lives. I’ve watched their relationships grow through situations in which some threat convinced them to cleave closer to Christ. God is so faithful. He can use the worst of circumstances to introduce us to the best of relationships. I am intrigued by the fact that Simon’s mother-in-law immediately began serving Christ and the others. Few people are more compelled to serve than those who have experienced the healing power of Christ.

Synthetic biology was the transistor of the twenty-first century. Yet political realities in America made it increasingly unfeasible for entrepreneurs there to tinker with the building blocks of life. Every cluster of human cells was viewed as a baby in America. A quarter of the population wasn’t vaccinated. A majority of Americans didn’t believe in evolution. Social-media-powered opinions carried more influence than peer-reviewed scientific research. In this virulently anti-science atmosphere, synbio research was hounded offshore before it had really begun. Activists crowed over their victory.

Our fascination with the gothic peaks in times of anxiety, panic, and upheaval. The Victorian gothic revival of the 1890s was stoked by scientific, technological, and social change. Industrialization and urbanization sparked feelings of alienation. Darwin's theories of evolution and the changing roles of women fanned racist, misogynistic, homophobic, and colonialist fears of 'primitivism,' moral decay, and sexual depravity. In the nineteenth century, terror-inducing imagery had shifted away from crumbling castles to crime-infested cities, and fear of villains and ghosts was supplanted by a fear of madness and degeneration. In the twentieth century, we celebrated/mourned the death of authorship, of the grand narrative, of the self, 'going-one-better in eschatological eloquence,' as Jacques Derrida put it, 'the end of history...the end of subject, the end of man, the end of the West, the end of Oedipus, the end of the earth, Apocalypse Now.' A few years into the new millennium, we were zombie hordes, stalking social media for brains. The gothic is the fucked-either-way-and-freaking-the-fuck-out school of artistic interpretation, the hysterical framework of doom. And this tension between horror as morality tale and horror as decadent spectacle is, I believe, what fueled the pandemic of tabloid stories about wayward starlets that raged throughout 2006 and 2007. Celebrity train wreck stories begin, conservatively, as cautionary tales. A young woman, unprotected or legally emancipated, has moved alone from the relatively sheltered and secluded condition of parent-managed child stardom (because who, nowadays, is more cut off from the world than a child star?) into a corrupt and dangerous world, where her beauty, fame, youth, fortune, and sexual allure are regarded with a charged, ambivalent awe. She is instantly besieged with dangers, and preyed upon by unscrupulous adults. Until they can be contained again, by marriage or paternal protection, she exists in a constant state of uncertainty and peril. The peril is created, of course, by the 'author' - the media outlets that shape the train wreck's life, again and again, into thrilling, chilling tales of suspense.

The first major step towards achieving true world peace, and one of the most important pinnacles in the evolution of mankind, is to shift people's perception of how they view wealth. If we can change the way consumers place value on material versus spiritual wealth, we can demolish the media. We can make the government work for us. We can have Big Business serving the vested interests of the people and we can put a halt to advertising puffery, toxic chemicals in our medicines and foods, wars, violence, and corruption. Peacemakers come from all trades. We can be and will be self-sufficient. It starts now. We far outweigh those setting the rules and limitations.

Planning – ‘Listen and learn’: Ensure commitment to get the business social. Presence – ‘Stake our claim’: Evolution from planning to action, establishing a formal and informed presence in social media; Engagement – ‘Dialogue deepens relationships’: Commitment where social media is seen as a critical element in relationship-building; Formalized – ‘Organize for scale’: A formalized approach focuses on three key activities: establishing an executive sponsor, creating a centre of excellence and establishing organization-wide governance; Strategic – ‘Become a social business’: Social media initiatives gain visibility and real business impact. Converged – ‘Business to social’: Having cross-functional and executive support, social business strategies start to weave into the fabric of an evolving organization.

Yet lost in the debate about America’s true intentions in the Middle East was the fact that large majorities in every Muslim-majority state surveyed told pollsters they wanted to see their countries move toward greater democracy. A wave of democratic fervor across the Middle East created a renewed sense of hope for scores of people who had spent their lives in autocratic societies but who now looked forward to the possibility of having a say, even if in the most limited of ways, in their own political destinies. The Green Movement in Iran lit the fuse, employing new social media technologies like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube to break the government’s monopoly over the media and to demonstrate to the world their aspiration for freedom and liberty.

Then, too,” she continued, “we’re more polarized than ever, more propagandized than ever. And this is only getting worse as new tech, especially social media and 24/7 news, divide us. First, we’re each getting individualized news feeds, so no two debaters are even working from the same set of facts, the same objective reality. And social media provides an anonymous platform to spew venom, to unleash our worst selves on each other, bypassing the normal restraints that evolution has built into us when interacting in person.

I believe this book offers a significant opportunity to stimulate global consciousness and to serve as a stepping-stone into the next realms of human evolution. I am encouraged that this publication will be made available to galleries, holistic centers, and integrative social media campaigns.

Look at her,” he said to himself. “Holding hands! She’s probably already camped in the woods with him! Exchanged supernatural stories. Dinner dates. Shared food! Sex in the car! Concerts! I can never reach a woman like that. She’s too experienced. What new could we do? Even if we were right for each other, I’d always feel small.” Once lonely, it seemed the evolution of lonely was getting lonelier, as if sad heads boarded a lifeboat in an ocean that naturally pulled one farther and farther apart from the coast of love. Andrei still hoped though. For that coast. That was the thing with this sailor—nothing was waiting for him, but maybe there was. Every time he met someone, his eyes were slightly far away, as if asking in his head: “It’s nice to meet you, but are you there? Did you suffer and reach that place yet? You know that place. Those in that place know that place. After Tolstoy? After a thousand movies? Will you say an honest sentence?” Oh, did he beg, secretly, for strangers to meet him on that lonely floor of life—where life, still hard, was earned, and true, and golden. The place, he cried, we recognize in media, binging in our beds, but don’t dare reach on sidewalks.

Don’t compare your start or middle to someone else’s ending, or you’ll never endure. In a social-media-fueled, all-access world, it becomes easy to take our evolution and compare it with someone else’s.

If social media is made for connection, why can’t we also have real-life centers for people to learn how to be independent? Poem - Curious. December 12, 2022.

The sexual competition hypothesis suggests that women are vulnerable to eating disorders because modern media augment the natural motivation for having a desirable body in order to get better mates. This explains why so many women use extreme caloric restriction in intense efforts to be attractive, but it does not by itself explain anorexia nervosa and bulimia.

Then, too,” she continued, “we’re more polarized than ever, more propagandized than ever. And this is only getting worse as new tech, especially social media and 24/7 news, divide us. First, we’re each getting individualized news feeds, so no two debaters are even working from the same set of facts, the same objective reality. And social media provides an anonymous platform to spew venom, to unleash our worst selves on each other, bypassing the normal restraints that evolution has built into us when interacting in person.” Singh paused and returned her glass to the table in front of her. “Our tech ensures we’re always connected, always reachable, always on call. Which is stressful enough. But even worse, the tech is designed to worm its way into our minds, tempting us into devoting more and more attention to it. As I mentioned, we’re in a society filled with people hell bent on doing whatever they can to addict us. It’s a war for your brain. “The alcohol industry, the gambling industry, the tobacco industry, the drug cartels, and many others have long done whatever they could get away with to better addict their customers. Then designer drugs came along, offering more potent, faster-acting highs that make them more addictive than ever before. “But it goes far beyond substance abuse. Over the past few decades we’ve invented entirely new classes of products. Products that lead to what is called behavioral addiction

I’m talking about all the order in the natural world,” Malcolm said. “And how perhaps it can emerge fast, through crystallization. Because complex animals can evolve their behavior rapidly. Changes can occur very quickly. Human beings are transforming the planet, and nobody knows whether it’s a dangerous development or not. So these behavioral processes can happen faster than we usually think evolution occurs. In ten thousand years human beings have gone from hunting to farming to cities to cyberspace. Behavior is screaming forward, and it might be nonadaptive. Nobody knows. Although personally, I think cyberspace means the end of our species.” “Yes? Why is that?” “Because it means the end of innovation,” Malcolm said. “This idea that the whole world is wired together is mass death. Every biologist knows that small groups in isolation evolve fastest. You put a thousand birds on an ocean island and they’ll evolve very fast. You put ten thousand on a big continent, and their evolution slows down. Now, for our own species, evolution occurs mostly through our behavior. We innovate new behavior to adapt. And everybody on earth knows that innovation only occurs in small groups. Put three people on a committee and they may get something done. Ten people, and it gets harder. Thirty people, and nothing happens. Thirty million, it becomes impossible. That’s the effect of mass media—it keeps anything from happening. Mass media swamps diversity. It makes every place the same. Bangkok or Tokyo or London: there’s a McDonald’s on one corner, a Benetton on another, a Gap across the street. Regional differences vanish. All differences vanish. In a mass-media world, there’s less of everything except the top ten books, records, movies, ideas. People worry about losing species diversity in the rain forest. But what about intellectual diversity—our most necessary resource? That’s disappearing faster than trees. But we haven’t figured that out, so now we’re planning to put five billion people together in cyberspace. And it’ll freeze the entire species. Everything will stop dead in its tracks. Everyone will think the same thing at the same time. Global uniformity. Oh, that hurts. Are you done?

There is nothing social about social media.

So-called social media is not social at all.

Patriotism does not signify only defending the state's borders, whether one wears a uniform decorated with medals or national dress or whatever else; it also means respecting its constitutional oath to obey its supreme authority and constitution. All pillars, Legislature, Executive, Judiciary, and Media of the state establish its sovereignty, whereas equality, maturity, and mutual participation among them are the spirit of integrity, stability, security, unity, evolution, growth, and success of the state and nation; otherwise, treason verifies itself.

The University of California, Berkeley, one of ten Universities in California, is in fact about to inaugurate, for the student season 2022-2023, a new course dedicated to rapper and singer, Nicki Minaj, entitled “The Galaxy of Hip-Hop Feminisms.” According to its description, “the constellation of dynamic voices, theories, and productions of underground and mainstream Black feminine rappers who have influenced the origins of Hip-Hop and its ongoing evolution.” It will also examine the “the genealogy and nuance of key Black feminine rappers and theoreticians in the field, practice, and culture of Hip-Hop Feminisms across the Black Diaspora.” Also, very interesting to understand is the “woke” propaganda, which is recommended readings for the course, that even include pornographic material, which come from supposed “Cultural Studies, Hip-Hop Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender & Sexuality Studies, Porn Studies, Media & Film Studies, and Performance Studies.

So why do so many of us feel such despair about the direction we’re heading?” asked Ella. “Because hope and optimism doesn’t sell nearly as well as pessimism and despair. Your news outlets earn clicks and viewership by sowing alarmism and division. Your social media plays to addictions and creates unprecedented social pressures. You’re wired by evolution to find bad news more motivational than good. To seek it out. “If your ancestors heard the rustle of a friendly breeze far away in the tall grass, and ran away, mistaking the breeze for a lion, this cost them very little. But if they heard the rustle of a lion in the tall grass, and mistook it for a friendly breeze, this would cost them their lives. Seeing potential bad news behind every harmless breeze is a survival instinct. “There are many other psychological and evolutionary reasons to account for the state of your discontent in the face of prosperity, but I’ll stop there.

Are you familiar with the horseshoe theory of politics?” “What about it?” “Most people think, politically speaking, that the right and the left are on a linear continuum—meaning that the right is on one side of the line, and the left is obviously on the other. That they are polar opposites. Far apart from one another. But the horseshoe theory says that the line is, well, shaped more like a horseshoe—that once you start going to the far right and the far left, that the line curves inward so that the two extremes are far closer to one another than they are to the center. Some go as far as to say it’s more like a circle—that the line bends so much that far left and far right are virtually indistinguishable—tyranny in one form or another.” “Senator?” “Yes?” “I studied political science too.” “Then you’ll understand what I’m trying to do.” Rusty came closer, wincing as he limped. The shattered leg from that terrible night too often tightened up. “Most Americans are in the middle relatively speaking. Most are somewhat left or right of that center. Those people don’t interest me. They are pragmatic. They change their minds. Voters always think the president has to appeal to those folks—the center. Half the country more or less is right, half is left, so you need to grab the middle. That’s not what I’m doing.” “I don’t see what that has to do with the Maynards,” Gavin said. “I am the next evolution of our outrage-fueled, social-media-obsessed political culture. The final evolution, if you will. The end of the status quo.

Atoms, elements and molecules are three important knowledge in Physics, chemistry and Biology. mathematics comes where counting starts, when counting and measurement started, integers were required. Stephen hawking says integers were created by god and everything else is work of man. Man sees pattern in everything and they are searched and applied to other sciences for engineering, management and application problems. Physics, it is required understand the physical nature or meaning of why it happens, chemistry is for chemical nature, Biology is for that why it happened. Biology touch medicine, plants and animals. In medicine how these atoms, elements and molecules interplay with each other by bondage is being explained. Human emotions and responses are because of biochemistry, hormones i e anatomy and physiology. This physiology deals with each and every organs and their functions. When this atom in elements are disturbed whatever they made i e macromolecules DNA, RNA and Protein and other micro and macro nutrients and which affects the physiology of different organs on different scales and then diseases are born because of this imbalance/ disturb in homeostasis. There many technical words are there which are hard to explain in single para. But let me get into short, these atoms in elements and molecules made interplay because of ecological stimulus i e so called god. and when opposite sex meets it triggers various responses on body of each. It is also harmone and they are acting because of atoms inside elements and continuous generation or degenerations of cell cycle. There is a god cell called totipotent stem cell, less gods are pluripotent, multi potent and noni potent stem cells. So finally each and every organ system including brain cells are affected because of interplay of atoms inside elements and their bondages in making complex molecules, which are ruled by ecological stimulus i e god. So everything is basically biology and medicine even for animals, plants and microbes and other life forms. process differs in each living organisms. The biggest mystery is Brain and DNA. Brain has lots of unexplained phenomenon and even dreams are not completely understood by science that is where spiritualism/ soul touches. DNA is long molecule which has many applications as genetic engineering. genomics, personal medicine, DNA as tool for data storage, DNA in panspermia theory and many more. So everything happens to women and men and other sexes are because of Biology, Medicine and ecology. In ecology every organisms are inter connected and inter dependent. Now physics - it touch all technical aspects but it needs mathematics and statistics to lay foundation for why and how it happened and later chemistry, biology also included inside physics. Mathematics gave raise to computers and which is for fast calculation on any applications in any sciences. As physiological imbalances lead to diseases and disorders, genetic mutations, again old concept evolution was retaken to understand how new biology evolves. For evolution and disease mechanisms, epidemiology and statistics was required and statistics was as a data tool considered in all sciences now a days. Ultimate science is to break the atoms to see what is inside- CERN, but it creates lots of mysterious unanswerable questions. laws in physics were discovered and invented with mathematics to understand the universe from atoms. Theory of everything is a long search and have no answers. While searching inside atoms, so many hypothesis like worm holes and time travel born but not yet invented as far as my knowledge. atom is universe, and humans are universe they have everything that universe has. ecology is god that affects humans and climate. In business these computerized AI applications are trying to figure out human emotions by their mechanism of writing, reading, texting, posting on social media and bla bla. Arts is trying to figure out human emotions in art way.

Online Marketing Strategy and Trends to Dominate in 2022 After observing some marketing strategies and trends that have emerged in the last few months, it seems fitting that we just hop on the bandwagon and give our take on them as well. After all, the landscape of online marketing is always changing. What worked last year might not do as much this year. And the same thing can be said of what will work and not work in the coming years. But our observations right now show a landscape full of new opportunities to try out. 2021 was a bit of a roller coaster for Meta. Besides just changing their name, they introduced something that appears to have gained a large foothold Don’t misunderstand, this isn’t just Facebook anymore. This is an entirely new world within the aspects of virtue and augmented reality. Before fully introducing this concept last October, it was just thought that the Metaverse would just be another video game console. As it turns out, it could be the next evolution of social media. This opens the doors for a new era of marketing strategy, with many brands already taking advantage of what the Metaverse has to offer. No matter what avenue you decide to take, always make sure you are creating top-notch quality content. Your marketing strategy has a higher chance of success when you do. Don’t get caught up in the rush to create as much content as possible. If you’re doing it by yourself, allow yourself to go slow at first. As you get comfortable with your new skills, you can then start to churn out more content that is high quality. As always, no matter what marketing strategy you decide, we at the Marketing Agency in Utah are here to assist you. Contact us to set up a consultation where we can discuss these and other marketing strategies that best fit your business needs!

Stories are our history. Yet many of the current incarnations of stories, news, and media seem to have taken an evolutional leap backward, and we use them as if we are, again, cave people relaying how best to entrap our prey. Rather than being about killing (outright, anyway), it has become about shame and ridicule, or, rather, technology has given the shame and ridicule that have always been present a velocity and reach they never had before.

the magazine’s reporter encountered Steve manning the Apple Computer booth at a computer fair. “I wish we’d had these personal machines when I was growing up,” Jobs tells him, before continuing on for a total of 224 words: “People have been hearing all sorts of things about computers during the past ten years through the media. Supposedly computers have been controlling various aspects of their lives. Yet, in spite of that, most adults have no idea what a computer really is, or what it can or can’t do. Now, for the first time, people can actually buy a computer for the price of a good stereo, interact with it, and find out all about it. It’s analogous to taking apart 1955 Chevys. Or consider the camera. There are thousands of people across the country taking photography courses. They’ll never be professional photographers. They just want to understand what the photographic process is all about. Same with computers. We started a little personal-computer manufacturing company in a garage in Los Altos in 1976. Now we’re the largest personal-computer company in the world. We make what we think of as the Rolls-Royce of personal computers. It’s a domesticated computer. People expect blinking lights, but what they find is that it looks like a portable typewriter, which, connected to a suitable readout screen, is able to display in color. There’s a feedback it gives to people who use it, and the enthusiasm of the users is tremendous. We’re always asked what it can do, and it can do a lot of things, but in my opinion the real thing it is doing right now is to teach people how to program the computer.” Before moving on to a booth where a bunch of kids were playing a computer game called Space Voyager, the reporter asks if Steve “would mind telling us his age. ‘Twenty-two,’ Mr. Jobs said.” Speaking off-the-cuff to a passing journalist from a decidedly nontechie publication, Steve finds so many ways to demystify for the average person the insanely geeky device that he and Woz had created.

New opportunities for New York as a high-tech hub are related to the evolution of the Internet, according to Chris Dixon: “Imagine the Internet as a house. The first phase— laying the foundation, the bricks—happened in the ‘90s. No wonder that Boston and California, heavy tech places with MIT and Stanford, dominated the scene at that time. The house has been built, now it’s more about interior design. Many interesting, recent companies haven’t been started by technologists but by design and product-oriented people, which has helped New York a lot. New York City has always been a consumer media kind of city, and the Internet is in need of those kinds of skills now. Actually, when I say design, it’s more about product-focused people. I’d put Facebook in that category. Everything requires engineers, but unlike Google, their breakthrough was not as scientific. It was a well-designed product that people liked to use. Google had a significant scientific breakthrough with their search algorithm. That’s not what drives Facebook. In The Social Network movie, when they write equations on the wall that’s just not what it is, it’s not about that. Every company has engineering problems, but Facebook is product-design driven.

the magazine’s reporter encountered Steve manning the Apple Computer booth at a computer fair. “I wish we’d had these personal machines when I was growing up,” Jobs tells him, before continuing on for a total of 224 words: “People have been hearing all sorts of things about computers during the past ten years through the media. Supposedly computers have been controlling various aspects of their lives. Yet, in spite of that, most adults have no idea what a computer really is, or what it can or can’t do. Now, for the first time, people can actually buy a computer for the price of a good stereo, interact with it, and find out all about it. It’s analogous to taking apart 1955 Chevys. Or consider the camera. There are thousands of people across the country taking photography courses. They’ll never be professional photographers. They just want to understand what the photographic process is all about. Same with computers. We started a little personal-computer manufacturing company in a garage in Los Altos in 1976. Now we’re the largest personal-computer company in the world. We make what we think of as the Rolls-Royce of personal computers. It’s a domesticated computer. People expect blinking lights, but what they find is that it looks like a portable typewriter, which, connected to a suitable readout screen, is able to display in color. There’s a feedback it gives to people who use it, and the enthusiasm of the users is tremendous. We’re always asked what it can do, and it can do a lot of things, but in my opinion the real thing it is doing right now is to teach people how to program the computer.

Modern man has made no significant leaps in the evolution of consciousness for thousands of years. In fact, we may even be less intelligent than some of the civilizations that have preceded us. Scientists have speculated that the gap of intelligence between great thinkers such as Einstein and Tesla compared to the average human is far greater than the gap between the average human and contemporary apes. What is it that is blocking us from achieving a superior level of intelligence? Aside from the mental conditioning that our culture has been subjected to, I believe that it is due to an utter lack of understanding human nature. Modern humans are raised in such a negative environment. The corruption of our educational system, economic structure, and media outlets has resulted in a state of ignorance common amongst most individuals.

Especially post-9/11, double consciousness manifested itself in the evolution of Muslim American engagement. Under microscopic scrutiny for terrorism and the collective expectation for us to constantly denounce, apologize, and take responsibility for the individual actions of extremists, we have severely internalized the public perception—empowered by media misrepresentation—of our communities as being made up of violent and crazy outsiders. As a result, we inadvertently prioritized shifting our image in the eyes of others rather than turning inward and cultivating our survival in this new trek we were forced to embark upon. I don’t blame our community for this.

It wasn’t just going to be a phone, nor was it going to be a phone that was a media player. It was going to be a full-blown computer, too. That meant it would also be a smartphone, one that was perpetually connected to the Internet. The easiest part was coming up with a name for it: iPhone, of course.

if everythin’s judged by individuals, social media takes over from traditional media, and the public decides what’s important, what has value. Not us. That’s never happened in the whole of human history. The people at the top have always told the rest of the tribe what to think.

It argues that the early history of electric media is less the evolution of technical efficiencies in communication than a series of arenas for negotiating issues crucial to the conduct of social life; among them, who is inside and outside, who may speak, who may not, and who has authority and may be believed.

Because hope and optimism doesn’t sell nearly as well as pessimism and despair. Your news outlets earn clicks and viewership by sowing alarmism and division. Your social media plays to addictions and creates unprecedented social pressures. You’re wired by evolution to find bad news more motivational than good. To seek it out. “If your ancestors heard the rustle of a friendly breeze far away in the tall grass, and ran away, mistaking the breeze for a lion, this cost them very little. But if they heard the rustle of a lion in the tall grass, and mistook it for a friendly breeze, this would cost them their lives. Seeing potential bad news behind every harmless breeze is a survival instinct.

What’s the last picture you posted?” Serge asked. “Umm… me and Quincy on set this morning.” “And the one before that?” “Me and Quincy having dinner last night with Gustavo and Casey.” “And the one before that.” “Quincy hanging from a tree branch, trying to fix the lighting the way he wanted. He looked so funny. I don’t know why people don’t believe in evolution. We obviously descended from primates.” “And the one before that.” “Me and Quincy laying in a pile of leaves. Oh man, that was great. We jumped in it and everything.” Xander sighed. “Now look at Casey’s profile. What’s the common denominator for most of his pictures?” He searched for Casey’s Instagram and opened it. “Let’s see. There’s him and Gustavo. Gustavo. Gustavo. Him and Gustavo. Harry S. Truman. The We Three Queens. Gustavo. Gustavo. Gustavo and Casey. Gustavo and Casey. A loaded pipe. The B and B. Gustavo. Gustavo. Gustavo. Wow. You know, for someone who hates social media as much as Gustavo does, he’s sure in here a lot.” “And what does your page have in common with Casey’s?” Serge asked. Josy squinted down at his phone. “We use a lot of the same filters?

You could even break it down by year and see the evolution of America that way. It, like America, became more and more diverse. Now, however, it’s a different story. They’re teaching extremely basic skills, things that children that age should already know. And the characters are more extravagant but lacking in depth. It’s a reflection of ourselves with all this celebrity worship and a disdain for all things intellectual. I think Sesame Street will predict the fall of our nation much better than any media outlet. They’ll begin to have characters, as they’re starting to now, that are homeless, or socialists, or felons. Then they’ll give up and begin teaching children just enough to get by. How to be manual laborers or soldiers or whatever else the dominant profession of a declining society will be.

Once, media was controlled by wealth and power. Today, every individual has become their own media.

...social media now seem poised to harm our mental health as much as fast food harms our physical health. We can't resist its pull despite the anxiety, depression and feelings of social inadequacy that are aroused by unprecedented social comparisons.

The Future of Social Media and Buy Verified Twitter Accounts The future of social media is a fascinating and ever-changing landscape, and the practice of buying verified Twitter (now X) accounts is at the very heart of its evolution. As platforms like X grapple with issues of authenticity, misinformation, and monetization, the value of a verified account is undergoing a profound transformation. Contact Us Telegram: @infousasmmstore WhatsApp: +1 (215) 510-3542 Email: ussmmstore@gmail.com We are moving away from a system where verification was a one-time badge of honor, and toward a model where it's a dynamic, subscription-based service. This shift has created a legitimate market for accounts, but it also means the future is fraught with new challenges and opportunities. A key trend we're seeing is the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into social media verification. In the future, AI will likely play a much more sophisticated role in detecting fraudulent accounts and ensuring authenticity. This could make it harder for low-quality, bot-farmed accounts to exist, forcing sellers to offer truly legitimate, human-managed accounts with real history. The market for verified accounts will likely become more discerning, with a premium placed on accounts that can pass AI-driven authenticity checks. Furthermore, as social media becomes a primary source of news and information, the public's perception of a verified check will continue to be a hot topic. The line between a paid-for service and a signal of authority is blurred, and this will shape how users interact with content. Contact Us Telegram: @infousasmmstore WhatsApp: +1 (215) 510-3542 Email: ussmmstore@gmail.com The future of buying verified X accounts will be less about the blue checkmark itself and more about the underlying trust and history of the account. Savvy buyers will seek out accounts that have a clean, aged history, as these will be the ones that hold their value and are less likely to be de-verified in a future crackdown.

Doomscrolling, binge-watching, and constant notifications can drain us just as much as hoarding physical objects.

{ 24/7 phone support } Does Coinbase Answer the Calls 24 Hours? As of 2025,+1-909-((479))-5669 Coinbase has significantly expanded its customer support infrastructure in the United States, offering 24/7 phone support to meet the growing demands of its user base. This round-the-clock availability reflects Coinbase’s commitment to delivering timely, accessible assistance,+1-909-((479))-5669 for both retail and premium customers. Whether you're facing issues with account access, transaction delays, or security concerns, users can now connect with live agents,+1-909-((479))-5669 at any hour, day or night. This marks a major shift from earlier years when support was often limited to business hours or restricted to chat and email channels. Coinbase’s 24-hour phone support,+1-909-((479))-5669 is part of a broader strategy to enhance user experience across its platform. In addition to phone assistance, the company also provides live chat, email support, ,+1-909-((479))-5669 and even social media engagement, ensuring users have multiple avenues to resolve their issues quickly. For those subscribed to Coinbase One Premium, the support,+1-909-((479))-5669 experience is even more personalized. These users benefit from a dedicated concierge team that offers tailored guidance, proactive account reviews, and faster resolution times. This premium tier is designed for high-volume,+1-909-((479))-5669 traders or users who require more hands-on assistance navigating the complexities of cryptocurrency. The company’s Help Center remains a central hub for self-service, ,+1-909-((479))-5669 offering AI-powered search tools and curated articles that address common problems like password resets, transaction tracking,+1-909-((479))-5669, and verification issues. However, for urgent or sensitive matters—such as suspected account compromise or unauthorized activity—the 24/7 phone support,+1-909-((479))-5669 provides a critical lifeline. Users can request a callback or initiate a live conversation with a trained support agent, ensuring that help is always within reach. Coinbase’s investment in continuous support,+1-909-((479))-5669 improvements is also evident in its multilingual capabilities and global reach. While the 24-hour phone support is fully operational in the U.S., ,+1-909-((479))-5669 the company is actively expanding similar services to other regions and languages. This global approach aligns with Coinbase’s mission to make crypto accessible and secure for everyone, regardless of location or technical expertise. In summary, ,+1-909-((479))-5669 Coinbase does indeed answer calls 24 hours a day in the United States as of 2025, offering a robust and responsive support system that caters to both everyday users and premium subscribers. This evolution in customer service not only enhances trust but also positions Coinbase as a leader,+1-909-((479))-5669 in user-centric support within the crypto industry. ,+1-909-((479))-5669 Whether you're trading at midnight or troubleshooting during a weekend, Coinbase ensures that expert help is always just a phone call away.

2026's Complete Guide to Buying twitter Accounts in USA, UK Buying or accepting control of pre-owned Twitter accounts frequently violates Twitter’s (X’s) rules. Accounts sold or transferred can be flagged, suspended, or permanently banned. Even if the account looks active, you may lose it overnight. ✅need your help just nock us 24/7 instant service.... ✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷ ➤ Email: smmusazone@gmail.com ✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦ ➤ Skype: smmusazone ✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷ ➤ Telegram: @smmusazone ✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦✦ ➤WhatsApp: +1 (850) 247-7643 ✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷ ✅Security, Fraud & Reputation Risks Sellers often recycle numbers and emails, install backdoors, or supply stolen credentials. Imagine building a brand on rented ground—when that ground gets taken away, all your followers, content and credibility vanish. So yes—shortcuts feel tempting, but they’re dangerous. This guide focuses on legal, low-risk ways to get the same or better results faster. ✅Why Twitter/X Still Matters in 2026 Platform Evolution & Key Features By 2026, Twitter (also called X by some) blends short-form broadcast, long-form threads, live audio/video, and paid subscriber features. It’s the place for breaking news, niche communities, and conversational marketing. Having a reliable, authentic presence matters more than follower counts. ✅Audience Differences: USA vs UK The US audience is large and diverse—ideal for scale and ad testing. The UK audience is smaller but often more conversational and media-savvy. Cultural nuance matters: Brits use more dry humor and local references; Americans favor bold calls-to-action and fast-paced content. Account Types & Which One You Need Personal vs Brand vs Organization Personal accounts are great for thought leadership and founder visibility. Brand accounts centralize voice, support, and promotions. Organization accounts serve official announcements and press. Pick the account that aligns with objectives: a founder building credibility will use a personal account; a retailer will need a brand account for support and ads. ✅Creator / Verified / Business Tools Creator tools unlock monetization, scheduling, and analytics. Business tools enable ad campaigns, conversion tracking, and detailed billing. Verify which features your goal requires, then apply or upgrade legitimately. Step-by-Step: Creating a Compliant Twitter/X Account (USA) Required Details & Best Practices Use a unique email (professional address recommended). Choose a handle that’s short, memorable, and keyword-friendly. Pick a consistent display name used across platforms. Upload a high-quality profile photo and header image. Phone, Email & Security Setup Add a mobile number for recovery and two-factor authentication (2FA). Use authenticator apps or SMS 2FA (authenticator is safer). Never reuse passwords—use a password manager. Pro tip: set up a secondary account for testing; never buy an account to skip setup. Step-by-Step: Creating a Compliant Twitter/X Account (UK) ✅Regional Variations & Tips The UK process is essentially the same, but watch out for billing and ad currency differences. If you plan to run paid promotion, set your account location and billing to the UK to access local features and currency-based targeting. ✅Document & Billing Notes If you apply for verification or use advanced ad features, you may need proof of identity or business registration. Keep scans handy, and use company cards where possible to simplify audits. Verification and Trust Signals (How to Get Verified Legitimately) ✅Verification Criteria in 2026 Verification now looks at public interest, media presence, and identity proof. Having an established website, press mentions, and consistent branding help your case.

How & Where to Buy twitter Accounts– Complete 2026 Guide In 2026, Twitter (or X, as Elon Musk rebranded it) has cemented itself as a powerhouse platform for news, culture, and digital marketing. As its influence grows, so does the temptation for individuals and businesses to buy Twitter accounts to fast-track growth. ✅need your help just nock us 24/7 Reply.... ✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷ ➤ Email: smmusazone@gmail.com ✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷ ➤ Skype: smmusazone ✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷ ➤ Telegram: @smmusazone ✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷ ➤WhatsApp: +1 (850) 247-7643 ✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷⚬✷ But hold on—while buying an account may sound like a shortcut, it’s a minefield full of risks. That’s why this Complete 2026 Guide explores everything you need to know: why accounts are in demand, what “buying” really means, the dangers, and most importantly—safe, legal alternatives. Understanding Twitter Accounts in 2026 Evolution of Twitter (Now X) Twitter has evolved into a multifaceted platform blending social media, payments, and AI-driven content feeds. With the rise of subscription-based features like X Premium and monetization programs, accounts hold more value than ever. ✅Why Accounts Are in Demand ✅Businesses want instant reach. ✅Influencers seek established credibility. ✅Marketers value aged accounts for SEO signals. What Does “Buying a Twitter Account” Mean? PVA (Phone Verified Accounts) Explained A PVA is a phone-verified account. Marketers often seek these because they’re more trusted and less likely to be flagged. ✅Aged Accounts vs. New Accounts ✅Aged Accounts: Built years ago, often carry followers and credibility. ✅New Accounts: Fresh, but lack trust signals. Why People Want to Buy Twitter Accounts Business Growth ✅Brands aim to bypass the slow grind of starting from scratch. ✅Influencer Marketing ✅Some hope to buy accounts with an existing following for instant influencer status. ✅SEO & Social Signals ✅Twitter remains a powerful off-page SEO tool, and aged accounts boost authority. Risks of Buying Twitter Accounts Legal Risks ✅Buying accounts often violates Twitter’s Terms of Service, risking suspension. ✅Purchased accounts can be compromised, recycled, or stolen. ✅Scammers dominate the market—buyers frequently lose money without guarantees. Legal and Ethical Alternatives Creating Your Own Twitter Account ✅It’s free, easy, and gives you full control. ✅By focusing on consistent posting, engagement, and hashtags, accounts grow sustainably. ✅Twitter Ads as an Alternative ✅Instead of buying followers, invest in Twitter Ads for targeted reach. Step-by-Step: Creating a Twitter Account in 2026 Account Setup ✅Enter name, email, or phone number. ✅Twitter now heavily enforces phone verification and encourages ID checks. ✅Security Enhancements ✅Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) immediately to safeguard your account. Best Practices for Building Authority Content Strategy ✅Post regularly with a mix of text, visuals, and short-form videos. ✅Engagement Hacks ✅Reply to trending tweets, use polls, and create threads. ✅Building Trust ✅Stay authentic—people follow real voices, not faceless accounts. ✅FAQs (Before Conclusion) 1. Can I legally buy a Twitter account? ✅No, it violates Twitter’s policies and risks permanent suspension. 2. Why do marketers seek PVA Twitter accounts? ✅Because they’re phone-verified, they appear more authentic and harder to flag. 3. Are aged accounts better than new ones? ✅Yes, but buying them is risky—better to build your own and let it age naturally. ✅Conclusion While buying Twitter accounts might look like a shortcut in 2026, the truth is it’s a dangerous gamble. Instead, focus on building your own verified account, growing organically, or leveraging Twitter Ads.

Buy Wise Verified Accounts – Instant Activation ➥24 Hours Reply/Contact ✅Telegram:@SMMTOPSHOPIT✅Skype: SMMTOPSHOPIT ✅Email:SMMTOPSHOPIT@Gmail.Com TransferWise Account is now Wise Account I am thrilled to inform you that the famous TransferWise Account has undergone a remarkable transformation and is now known as the Wise Account. With this rebranding, the efficiency and innovation of online financial services are entering a new chapter. This content reads as if it is human-written. A dedication to ease of use, openness, and worldwide connectivity is demonstrated by the switch to Wise Account. Users can expect the same trusted service with enhanced features and a renewed focus on making international money transfers easier and more affordable. Embrace the future of unlimited cross-border higher transaction limits with the all-new Wise Account. Experience the evolution firsthand and redefine the way you manage your money globally. In short, TransferWise has rebranded to Wise, offering the same trusted international money transfer services with a new name. Existing TransferWise accounts seamlessly transition to Wise business accounts, maintaining all features and benefits. Customers can continue to enjoy fast transfers, and low-cost transfers in multiple currencies, now under the refreshed and innovative Wise brand ➥24 Hours Reply/Contact ✅Telegram:@SMMTOPSHOPIT✅Skype: SMMTOPSHOPIT ✅Email:SMMTOPSHOPIT@Gmail.Com Why Verification Is Crucial For Wise Accounts Why is account verification so essential? You can Wise Accounts from extortion and hacking by verifying your social media and other online accounts. Discover why it makes sense to go the additional documents mile for confirmation. Don’t skip account verification – it could save you from disaster. To show what happens to accounts that are not sufficiently verified and secured, this article examines real-world examples. Find the significance of confirmation by perusing on. 1) Fraud and account hacking are sadly commonplace. Understand the value of authentication for your online accounts—financial industry, social, and others—to protect yourself. This blog offers information on recommended practices for validation. 2) Is account verification worth the extra layer hassle? Yes, maybe if you are a big businessman! This content is why the verification process, although cumbersome, is an essential step in securing your online presence, Buy Verified Wise Accounts is important. Verified accounts of real-world examples are tempting. So everyone needs to have these Verified Wise Accounts. ➥24 Hours Reply/Contact ✅Telegram:@SMMTOPSHOPIT✅Skype: SMMTOPSHOPIT ✅Email:SMMTOPSHOPIT@Gmail.Com

How do I contact Atomic Wallet customer service? In addition to the formal support provided call at {1-833-611-5103} through official channels like call at {1-833-611-5103}, Atomic Wallet benefits from a memetic evolution of solutions within its user community, where successful fixes and workarounds are shared and mutated call at {1-833-611-5103} through forums and social media, creating a living body of knowledge that complements the official support from call at {1-833-611-5103}. The support team actively monitors these community spaces, not to replace their function, but call at {1-833-611-5103} to identify emerging trends, validate effective user-generated solutions, and incorporate them into the official knowledge call at {1-833-611-5103} base accessible to all agents, ensuring that the wisdom of the crowd enhances the professional support. This memetic ecosystem means that a user who first seeks help in a community forum might be directed to the official support line call at {1-833-611-5103} for verification and escalation, while a solution discovered by an agent might later be shared and adapted within the call at {1-833-611-5103} community, creating a virtuous cycle of knowledge sharing. This interaction between formal support and informal community memes creates call at {1-833-611-5103} a resilient and adaptive overall support environment for all Atomic Wallet users.

Complete 2026 Guide to Buying twitter Accounts– in onelin In 2026, Twitter (or X, as Elon Musk rebranded it) has cemented itself as a powerhouse platform for news, culture, and digital marketing. As its influence grows, so does the temptation for individuals and businesses to buy Twitter accounts to fast-track growth. ✅need your help just nock us 24/7 instant service.... ➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪ ➤ Email: smmusazone@gmail.com ❯❯❯❯➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ❯❯❯❯➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ ➤ Skype: smmusazone ➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪ ➤ Telegram: @smmusazone ➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪ ➤WhatsApp: +1 (850) 247-7643 ➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪ But hold on—while buying an account may sound like a shortcut, it’s a minefield full of risks. That’s why this Complete 2026 Guide explores everything you need to know: why accounts are in demand, what “buying” really means, the dangers, and most importantly—safe, legal alternatives. ✅Understanding Twitter Accounts in 2026 Evolution of Twitter (Now X) Twitter has evolved into a multifaceted platform blending social media, payments, and AI-driven content feeds. With the rise of subscription-based features like X Premium and monetization programs, accounts hold more value than ever. Why Accounts Are in Demand Businesses want instant reach. ✅Influencers seek established credibility. ✅Marketers value aged accounts for SEO signals. ✅What Does “Buying a Twitter Account” Mean? PVA (Phone Verified Accounts) Explained A PVA is a phone-verified account. Marketers often seek these because they’re more trusted and less likely to be flagged. Aged Accounts vs. New Accounts Aged Accounts: Built years ago, often carry followers and credibility. ✅New Accounts: Fresh, but lack trust signals. ✅Why People Want to Buy Twitter Accounts Business Growth Brands aim to bypass the slow grind of starting from scratch. Influencer Marketing Some hope to buy accounts with an existing following for instant influencer status. SEO & Social Signals Twitter remains a powerful off-page SEO tool, and aged accounts boost authority. ✅Risks of Buying Twitter Accounts Legal Risks Buying accounts often violates Twitter’s Terms of Service, risking suspension. Security Risks Purchased accounts can be compromised, recycled, or stolen. Financial Risks Scammers dominate the market—buyers frequently lose money without guarantees. ✅Legal and Ethical Alternatives Creating Your Own Twitter Account It’s free, easy, and gives you full control. Growing Organically By focusing on consistent posting, engagement, and hashtags, accounts grow sustainably. Twitter Ads as an Alternative Instead of buying followers, invest in Twitter Ads for targeted reach. ✅FAQs (Before Conclusion) 1. Can I legally buy a Twitter account? ✅ No, it violates Twitter’s policies and risks permanent suspension. 2. Why do marketers seek PVA Twitter accounts? ✅ Because they’re phone-verified, they appear more authentic and harder to flag. 3. Are aged accounts better than new ones? ✅ Yes, but buying them is risky—better to build your own and let it age naturally. 4. How can I grow without buying an account? ✅ Use Twitter Ads, post consistently, and engage in trending conversations. 5. Can businesses outside the USA create verified accounts? ✅Yes, Twitter allows global verification if proper documentation is provided. 6. What happens if I buy an account anyway? ✅ You risk losing money and the account, plus facing permanent bans. ✅Conclusion While buying Twitter accounts might look like a shortcut in 2026, the truth is it’s a dangerous gamble. Instead, focus on building your own verified account, growing organically, or leveraging Twitter Ads. That way, you not only avoid legal and security risks but

Where Can I Buying Twitter Accounts (PVA & Old) In 2026, Twitter (or X, as Elon Musk rebranded it) has cemented itself as a powerhouse platform for news, culture, and digital marketing. As its influence grows, so does the temptation for individuals and businesses to buy Twitter accounts to fast-track growth. ✅need your help just nock us 24/7 instant service.... ❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯ ➤ Email: smmusazone@gmail.com ❯❯❯❯➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ❯❯❯❯➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ ➤ Skype: smmusazone ❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯ ➤ Telegram: @smmusazone ❯❯❯❯➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ❯❯❯❯➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ ➤WhatsApp: +1 (850) 247-7643 ❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯ But hold on—while buying an account may sound like a shortcut, it’s a minefield full of risks. That’s why this Complete 2026 Guide explores everything you need to know: why accounts are in demand, what “buying” really means, the dangers, and most importantly—safe, legal alternatives. ✅Understanding Twitter Accounts in 2026 Evolution of Twitter (Now X) Twitter has evolved into a multifaceted platform blending social media, payments, and AI-driven content feeds. With the rise of subscription-based features like X Premium and monetization programs, accounts hold more value than ever. Why Accounts Are in Demand Businesses want instant reach. ✅Influencers seek established credibility. ✅Marketers value aged accounts for SEO signals. ✅What Does “Buying a Twitter Account” Mean? PVA (Phone Verified Accounts) Explained A PVA is a phone-verified account. Marketers often seek these because they’re more trusted and less likely to be flagged. ✅Aged Accounts vs. New Accounts Aged Accounts: Built years ago, often carry followers and credibility. ✅New Accounts: Fresh, but lack trust signals. ✅Why People Want to Buy Twitter Accounts Business Growth Brands aim to bypass the slow grind of starting from scratch. ✅Influencer Marketing Some hope to buy accounts with an existing following for instant influencer status. SEO & Social Signals Twitter remains a powerful off-page SEO tool, and aged accounts boost authority. ✅Risks of Buying Twitter Accounts Legal Risks Buying accounts often violates Twitter’s Terms of Service, risking suspension. Security Risks Purchased accounts can be compromised, recycled, or stolen. Financial Risks Scammers dominate the market—buyers frequently lose money without guarantees. ✅Legal and Ethical Alternatives Creating Your Own Twitter Account It’s free, easy, and gives you full control. ✅Growing Organically By focusing on consistent posting, engagement, and hashtags, accounts grow sustainably. Twitter Ads as an Alternative Instead of buying followers, invest in Twitter Ads for targeted reach. ✅Step-by-Step: Creating a Twitter Account in 2026 Account Setup Go to twitter.com. ✅Click Sign Up. ✅Enter name, email, or phone number. ✅Verification Process Twitter now heavily enforces phone verification and encourages ID checks. Security Enhancements Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) immediately to safeguard your account. ✅Conclusion While buying Twitter accounts might look like a shortcut in 2026, the truth is it’s a dangerous gamble. Instead, focus on building your own verified account, growing organically, or leveraging Twitter Ads. That way, you not only avoid legal and security risks but

2026's How Do I Quickly Buying twitter Accounts in USA, UK Buying or accepting control of pre-owned Twitter accounts frequently violates Twitter’s (X’s) rules. Accounts sold or transferred can be flagged, suspended, or permanently banned. Even if the account looks active, you may lose it overnight. ✅ smmusazone 24/7 service ➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪ ➤ Email: smmusazone@gmail.com ❯❯❯❯➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ❯❯❯❯➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ㆍ➢ㆍ➢❯❯❯❯ ➤ Skype: smmusazone ➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪ ➤ Telegram: @smmusazone ➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪❯❯❯➪➪❯❯➪➪ ➤WhatsApp: +1 (850) 247-7643 ❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯❯ ➪➪Security, Fraud & Reputation Risks Sellers often recycle numbers and emails, install backdoors, or supply stolen credentials. Imagine building a brand on rented ground—when that ground gets taken away, all your followers, content and credibility vanish. So yes—shortcuts feel tempting, but they’re dangerous. This guide focuses on legal, low-risk ways to get the same or better results faster. ➪➪Why Twitter/X Still Matters in 2026 Platform Evolution & Key Features By 2026, Twitter (also called X by some) blends short-form broadcast, long-form threads, live audio/video, and paid subscriber features. It’s the place for breaking news, niche communities, and conversational marketing. Having a reliable, authentic presence matters more than follower counts. ➪➪Audience Differences: USA vs UK The US audience is large and diverse—ideal for scale and ad testing. The UK audience is smaller but often more conversational and media-savvy. Cultural nuance matters: Brits use more dry humor and local references; Americans favor bold calls-to-action and fast-paced content. ➪➪Account Types & Which One You Need Personal vs Brand vs Organization Personal accounts are great for thought leadership and founder visibility. ✅Brand accounts centralize voice, support, and promotions. ✅Organization accounts serve official announcements and press. Pick the account that aligns with objectives: a founder building credibility will use a personal account; a retailer will need a brand account for support and ads. ➪➪Creator / Verified / Business Tools Creator tools unlock monetization, scheduling, and analytics. Business tools enable ad campaigns, conversion tracking, and detailed billing. Verify which features your goal requires, then apply or upgrade legitimately. ➪➪Step-by-Step: Creating a Compliant Twitter/X Account (USA) Required Details & Best Practices Use a unique email (professional address recommended). ✅Choose a handle that’s short, memorable, and keyword-friendly. ✅Pick a consistent display name used across platforms. ✅Upload a high-quality profile photo and header image. ➪➪Phone, Email & Security Setup Add a mobile number for recovery and two-factor authentication (2FA). ✅Use authenticator apps or SMS 2FA (authenticator is safer). ✅Never reuse passwords—use a password manager. ✅Pro tip: set up a secondary account for testing; never buy an account to skip setup. ➪➪Step-by-Step: Creating a Compliant Twitter/X Account (UK) Regional Variations & Tips The UK process is essentially the same, but watch out for billing and ad currency differences. If you plan to run paid promotion, set your account location and billing to the UK to access local features and currency-based targeting. ➪➪Document & Billing Notes If you apply for verification or use advanced ad features, you may need proof of identity or business registration. Keep scans handy, and use company cards where possible to simplify audits. ➪➪Verification and Trust Signals (How to Get Verified Legitimately) Verification Criteria in 2026 Verification now looks at public interest, media presence, and identity proof. Having an established website, press mentions, and consistent branding help your case.

Buy Hotmail Account – Global Access, 100% Working If you want to more information just contact now. 24 Hours Reply/Contact ➤E-mail: pvarapid@gmail.com ➤Telegram: @pvarapid ➤WhatsApp: +1 (213) 675-2422 Buy Hotmail Accounts In today’s digital landscape, having multiple email accounts is more than just a convenience; it’s often crucial for success. One platform that continues to hold significance in the online world is Hotmail. Despite its age, many users find value in this classic service. Whether you’re managing personal projects or professional communications, an old Hotmail account can offer unique advantages. But where do you go if you're looking to expand your email portfolio? There’s a growing interest in buying Hotmail accounts—not just any accounts, but those with history and credibility. As we dive deeper into this topic, you'll discover the ins and outs of why people are seeking these aged emails and what benefits they can bring to your online presence. So let’s explore everything from where to buy them to how they can enhance your digital experience! If you want to more information just contact now. 24 Hours Reply/Contact ➤E-mail: pvarapid@gmail.com ➤Telegram: @pvarapid ➤WhatsApp: +1 (213) 675-2422 Where to Buy Hotmail Accounts? Finding a reliable source to buy Hotmail accounts can be challenging. Many websites claim to sell these accounts, but not all are trustworthy. Start your search on reputable online marketplaces or forums. These platforms often have user reviews that provide insights into the sellers’ credibility. You might also want to explore specialized services focusing on aged email accounts. They typically offer verified and safe options, ensuring you don’t end up with compromised credentials. Social media groups dedicated to digital marketing can also be valuable resources. Members frequently share leads on where to find legitimate Hotmail accounts for purchase. Always prioritize security and privacy when buying an account. Ensure that any transaction is secure and avoid sites with poor reputations or negative feedback from previous customers. What is Hotmail? Hotmail is one of the pioneers in web-based email services, launched back in 1996. It quickly gained popularity due to its user-friendly interface and free access. Acquired by Microsoft in 1997, Hotmail underwent significant transformations. The service was rebranded as Outlook.com, but many still fondly remember their original Hotmail addresses. Users appreciated the ability to send emails from anywhere with an internet connection. It revolutionized how people communicated, making it instant and accessible. Despite its evolution into Outlook, the name "Hotmail" continues to carry nostalgia for long-time users. Many rely on these accounts for personal or professional communication even today. In essence, Hotmail laid the groundwork for modern email experiences we enjoy now. Its legacy lives on through millions of active users globally who cherish their old accounts. Why People Search for Old Hotmail Accounts Many people search for old Hotmail accounts due to nostalgia. These accounts often represent a simpler time in the digital world, filled with memories of early internet interactions. Old Hotmail addresses are sometimes linked to significant life events or connections that have faded over the years. Reclaiming them can evoke cherished memories and reconnect users with their past. There’s also an element of practicality involved. Some individuals seek access to long-forgotten emails, documents, or contacts stored within these accounts. They might contain vital information that is hard to retrieve otherwise. Moreover, older email addresses can carry a sense of credibility. In certain business scenarios, having an established account may lend authority and trustworthiness in communications. This makes searching for old Hotmail accounts appealing not just personally but p