Everything Has A Validity Quotes

Attitude Is Everything We live in a culture that is blind to betrayal and intolerant of emotional pain. In New Age crowds here on the West Coast, where your attitude is considered the sole determinant of the impact an event has on you, it gets even worse.In these New Thought circles, no matter what happens to you, it is assumed that you have created your own reality. Not only have you chosen the event, no matter how horrible, for your personal growth. You also chose how you interpret what happened—as if there are no interpersonal facts, only interpretations. The upshot of this perspective is that your suffering would vanish if only you adopted a more evolved perspective and stopped feeling aggrieved. I was often kindly reminded (and believed it myself), “there are no victims.” How can you be a victim when you are responsible for your circumstances? When you most need validation and support to get through the worst pain of your life, to be confronted with the well-meaning, but quasi-religious fervor of these insidious half-truths can be deeply demoralizing. This kind of advice feeds guilt and shame, inhibits grieving, encourages grandiosity and can drive you to be alone to shield your vulnerability.

I don’t think the world should assume that we are all natural mothers. And it does. I don’t think it’s such a big thing anymore, but the idea that you sacrifice everything for your children—it’s a load of rubbish. It leads to very destructive living and thinking, and it has a much worse effect on children than if you go out and live your own life. You’re meant to adore your children at all times, and you’re not meant to have a bad thought about them. That’s facism, you know, and it’s elevating the child at the expense of the mother. It’s like your life is not valid except in fulfilling this child’s needs. What about all your needs, your desires, your wants, your problems? They’re going to come out anyway, so it’s better they’re acknowledged straight off. Having said that, I really do believe that children have to be protected. They have to be loved. Somewhere between the two, I think, something needs to be sorted out. The relationship between parent and child is so difficult and so complex. There’s every emotion there. We mostly only acknowledge the good ones. If we were allowed to talk about the other ones, maybe it would alleviate them in some way

The other one, the one called Borges, is the one things happen to. I walk through the streets of Buenos Aires and stop for a moment, perhaps mechanically now, to look at the arch of an entrance hall and the grillwork on the gate. I know of Borges from the mail and see his name on a list of professors or in a biographical dictionary. I like hourglasses, maps, eighteenth-century typography, the taste of coffee and the prose of Stevenson; he shares these preferences, but in a vain way that turns them into the attributes of an actor. It would be an exaggeration to say that ours is a hostile relationship. I live, let myself go on living, so that Borges may contrive his literature, and this literature justifies me. It is no effort for me to confess that he has achieved some valid pages, but those pages cannot save me, perhaps because what is good belongs to no one, not even to him, but rather to the language and to tradition. Besides I am destined to perish, definitively, and only some instant of myself can survive in him. Little by little, I am giving over everything to him, though I am quite aware of his perverse custom of falsifying and magnifying things. Spinoza knew that all things long to persist in their being; the stone eternally wants to be a stone, and the tiger a tiger. I shall remain in Borges, not in myself (if it is true that I am someone), but I recognize myself less in his books than in many others or in the laborious strumming of a guitar. Years ago I tried to free myself from him and went from the mythologies of the suburbs to the games with time and infinity, but those games belong to Borges now and I shall have to imagine other things. Thus my life is a flight and I lose everything and everything belongs to oblivion, or to him. I do not know which of us has written this page.

Your faith is your conscience, and your conscience is your faith. You cannot have faith without a conscience, but you can have a conscience without faith. Man was designed to be good with or without religion, yet the challenge for many is staying good. Some people claim to be religious but have no conscience, while some people without religion are very much aware of their conscience. Therefore, a religious label does not define your character or validate your worth. In the end, all men will be judged by the amount of truth in them and the weight of their hearts. The heavier the conscience, the heavier the truth. The lighter the heart, the higher it goes. The only spiritual currency one has in the afterlife is amassed in the form of light, in that, the amount you have depends on the weight of your words and deeds in the living. Conscience is everything. Conscience is what connects us to the truth and light of the highest power source of all. God. The cosmic heart of the universe.

the State is everything; the individual, nothing. The individual has no rights that the State is bound to respect; no rights at all, in fact, except those which the State may choose to give him, subject to revocation at its own pleasure, with or without notice. There is no such thing as natural rights; the fundamental doctrine of the American Declaration of Independence, the doctrine underlying the Bill of Rights, is all moonshine. Moreover, since the State creates all rights, since the only valid and authoritative ethics are State ethics, then by obvious inference the State can do no wrong.

Everything has the quality of a dream when you choose to disconnect yourself from daily interaction with other people, and so, like a dream, you come to question the validity of what you see and hear.

Error regarding life necessary to life. - Every belief in the value and dignity of life rests on false thinking; it is possible only through the fact that empathy with the universal life and suffering of mankind is very feebly developed in the individual. Even those rarer men who think beyond themselves at all have an eye, not for this universal life, but for fenced-off portions of it. If one knows how to keep the exceptions principally in view, I mean the greatly gifted and pure of soul, takes their production for the goal of world-evolution and rejoices in the effects they in turn produce, one may believe in the value of life, because the one is overlooking all other men: thinking falsely, that is to say. And likewise if, though one does keep in view all mankind, one accords validity only to one species of drives, the less egoistical, and justifies them in face of all the others, then again one can hope for something of mankind as a whole and to this extent believe in the value of life: thus, in this case too, through falsity of thinking. Whichever of these attitudes one adopts, however, one is by adopting in an exception among men. The great majority endure life without complaining overmuch; they believe in the value of existence, but they do so precisely because each of them exists for himself alone, refusing to step out of himself as those exceptions do: everything outside themselves they notice not at all or at most as a dim shadow. Thus for the ordinary, everyday man the value of life rests solely on the fact that regards himself more highly than he does the world. The great lack of imagination from which he suffers means he is unable to feel his way into other beings and thus he participates as little as possible in their fortunes and sufferings. He, on the other hand, who really could participate in them would have to despair of the value of life; if he succeeded in encompassing and feeling within himself the total consciousness of mankind he would collapse with a curse on existence - for mankind has as a whole no goal, and the individual man when he regards its total course cannot derive from it any support or comfort, but must be reduced to despair. If in all he does he has before him the ultimate goallessness of man, his actions acquire in his own eyes the character of useless squandering. But to feel thus squandered, not merely as an individual fruits but as humanity as a whole, in the way we behold the individual fruits of nature squandered, is a feeling beyond all other feelings. - But who is capable of such a feeling? Certainly only a poet: and poets always know how to console themselves.

Proudhon (Weitling too) thinks he is telling the worst about property when he calls it theft (vol.) Passing quite over the embarrassing ques­tion, what well-founded objection could be made against theft, we only ask: Is the concept 'theft' at all possible unless one allows validity to the concept 'property'? How can one steal if property is not already extant? What belongs to no one cannot be stolen; the water that one draws out of the sea he does not steal. Accordingly property is not theft, but a theft becomes possible only through property. Weitling has to come to this too, as he does regard everything as the property of all: if something is 'the property of all' then indeed the individual who appropriates it to himself steals.

In themselves pictures are beyond words, beyond concepts, beyond thought, they invoke the presence of the world on the world's terms, which also means that everything that has been thought and written in this book stops being valid the moment your gaze meets the canvas.

One of the signs of a great society is the diligence with which it passes culture from one generation to the next. This culture is the embodiment of everything the people of that society hold dear: its religious faith, its heroes.....when one generation no longer esteems it's own heritage and fails to pass the torch to its children, it is saying in essence that the very foundational principles and experiences that make the society what it is are no longer valid. This leaves that generation without any sense of definition or direction, making them the fulfillment of Karl Marx's dictum, 'A people without a heritage are easily persuaded.' What is required when this happens and the society has lost its way, is for leaders to arise, who have not forgotten the discarded legacy and who love it with all their hearts. They can then become the voice of that lost generation, wooing an errant generation back to the faith of their fathers, back to the ancient foundations and bedrock values.... (Allegendly cited in Stephen Mansfield - Never Give In, The Extraordinary Character of Winston Churchill)

I rest because he has said nothing would take his love from me, or you. I can’t say that would be true of any other human kind of love. In fact, it’s so different from “regular” love that it’s hard to believe that it could be really true. So God pursues us, courts us, and woos us to remind us. As if he wants to keep us mindful that he doesn’t get tired of us, he isn’t frustrated by our moods or by our irritating habits or put off by uncombed hair or out-of-style clothes. We are free to place the whole weight of our needs on him, to bring him our deepest questions, to look to him for acceptance and validation. And unlike any other relationship, the God who designed us will not lean, crumble, struggle, stagger, or falter in any way. This is a love that changes everything.

He targeted her because she’s extremely insecure, and he figured out how to give her whatever validation she needed. For someone who has been looking to be validated her entire life, do you know how powerful it would be to hear ‘I’m giving up everything for you’?” I think back to the person I was when I met Marco. I was desperate for external validation. I needed someone to tell me I was special so that I could believe it myself. I decided that Marco was my missing piece and because of his love, I would finally be whole. I wanted so badly to feel the “magic” of love, to be adored, to find my fairy-tale ending, to be complete.

Pay attention to everything the dying person says. You might want to keep pens and a spiral notebook beside the bed so that anyone can jot down notes about gestures, conversations, or anything out of the ordinary said by the dying person. Talk with one another about these comments and gestures. • Remember that there may be important messages in any communication, however vague or garbled. Not every statement made by a dying person has significance, but heed them all so as not to miss the ones that do. • Watch for key signs: a glassy-eyed look; the appearance of staring through you; distractedness or secretiveness; seemingly inappropriate smiles or gestures, such as pointing, reaching toward someone or something unseen, or waving when no one is there; efforts to pick at the covers or get out of bed for no apparent reason; agitation or distress at your inability to comprehend something the dying person has tried to say. • Respond to anything you don’t understand with gentle inquiries. “Can you tell me what’s happening?” is sometimes a helpful way to initiate this kind of conversation. You might also try saying, “You seem different today. Can you tell me why?” • Pose questions in open-ended, encouraging terms. For example, if a dying person whose mother is long dead says, “My mother’s waiting for me,” turn that comment into a question: “Mother’s waiting for you?” or “I’m so glad she’s close to you. Can you tell me about it?” • Accept and validate what the dying person tells you. If he says, “I see a beautiful place!” say, “That’s wonderful! Can you tell me more about it?” or “I’m so pleased. I can see that it makes you happy,” or “I’m so glad you’re telling me this. I really want to understand what’s happening to you. Can you tell me more?” • Don’t argue or challenge. By saying something like “You couldn’t possibly have seen Mother, she’s been dead for ten years,” you could increase the dying person’s frustration and isolation, and run the risk of putting an end to further attempts at communicating. • Remember that a dying person may employ images from life experiences like work or hobbies. A pilot may talk about getting ready to go for a flight; carry the metaphor forward: “Do you know when it leaves?” or “Is there anyone on the plane you know?” or “Is there anything I can do to help you get ready for takeoff?” • Be honest about having trouble understanding. One way is to say, “I think you’re trying to tell me something important and I’m trying very hard, but I’m just not getting it. I’ll keep on trying. Please don’t give up on me.” • Don’t push. Let the dying control the breadth and depth of the conversation—they may not be able to put their experiences into words; insisting on more talk may frustrate or overwhelm them. • Avoid instilling a sense of failure in the dying person. If the information is garbled or the delivery impossibly vague, show that you appreciate the effort by saying, “I can see that this is hard for you; I appreciate your trying to share it with me,” or “I can see you’re getting tired/angry/frustrated. Would it be easier if we talked about this later?” or “Don’t worry. We’ll keep trying and maybe it will come.” • If you don’t know what to say, don’t say anything. Sometimes the best response is simply to touch the dying person’s hand, or smile and stroke his or her forehead. Touching gives the very important message “I’m with you.” Or you could say, “That’s interesting, let me think about it.” • Remember that sometimes the one dying picks an unlikely confidant. Dying people often try to communicate important information to someone who makes them feel safe—who won’t get upset or be taken aback by such confidences. If you’re an outsider chosen for this role, share the information as gently and completely as possible with the appropriate family members or friends. They may be more familiar with innuendos in a message because they know the person well.

But perhaps the most important criticism of string theory is that it predicts a multiverse of universes. Einstein once said that the key question was: Did God have a choice in making the universe? Is the universe unique? String theory by itself is unique, but it probably has an infinite number of solutions. Physicists call this the landscape problem—the fact that our universe may be just one solution among an ocean of other equally valid ones. If our universe is one of many possibilities, then which one is ours? Why do we live in this particular universe and not another? What, then, is the predictive power of string theory? Is it a theory of everything or a theory of anything?

I think Yogi Berra said, “You don’t know what you don’t know,” and that’s exactly the problem here. We’re not going to look for another type of love if we don’t even know it exists, or how it feels. So it’s easy to get stuck with this false blueprint of love and develop all sorts of maladaptive needs based on that. Suddenly we’re looking outward for love, imagining a savior, or saving others, stuck with vengeful thoughts, seeking external validation and approval, trying to do everything perfectly. In order to find a different kind of love, we need to tame our own ego that has been hugely inflated, criticized, and ultimately betrayed. Underneath all of that is where you’ll find the good stuff: feelings, the heart, the real you.

In summer, most ramen restaurants in Tokyo serve hiyashi chūka, a cold ramen noodle salad topped with strips of ham, cucumber, and omelet; a tart sesame- or soy-based sauce; and sometimes other vegetables, like a tomato wedge or sheets of wakame seaweed. The vegetables are arranged in piles of parallel shreds radiating from the center to the edge of the plate like bicycle spokes, and you toss everything together before eating. It's bracing, ice-cold, addictive- summer food from the days before air conditioning. In Oishinbo: Ramen and Gyōza, a young lifestyle reporter wants to write an article about hiyashi chūka. "I'm not interested in something like hiyashi chūka," says my alter ego Yamaoka. It's a fake Chinese dish made with cheap industrial ingredients, he explains. Later, however, Yamaoka relents. "Cold noodles, cold soup, and cold toppings," he muses. "The idea of trying to make a good dish out of them is a valid one." Good point, jerk. He mills organic wheat into flour and hires a Chinese chef to make the noodles. He buys a farmyard chicken from an old woman to make the stock and seasons it with the finest Japanese vinegar, soy sauce, and sake. Yamaoka's mean old dad Kaibara Yūzan inevitably gets involved and makes an even better hiyashi chūka by substituting the finest Chinese vinegar, soy sauce, and rice wine. When I first read this, I enjoyed trying to follow the heated argument over this dish I'd never even heard of. Yamaoka and Kaibara are in total agreement that hiyashi chūka needs to be made with quality ingredients, but they disagree about what kind of dish it is: Chinese, Japanese, or somewhere in between? Unlike American food, Japanese cuisine has boundary issues.

The Eternal Return has certainly not been thought by philosophers or by those who are concerned about Nietzsche in the contemporary history of ideas, and this because the Eternal Return can not be thought of. It is a revelation that presents next to the Silvaplana rock, or on the threshold of the Gateway of the Moment, where the Two Ways meet. You will have to travel step by step along the path of Western yoga that Nietzsche rediscovered and practiced, putting his feet in the tracks that he left in the paths of the high peaks, relive their great pains and divine glories, reaching to reach similar tonalities of the soul, to be possessed by Dionysus and his ancient drunkenness, Luciferian, that makes dance in the solitude of forests and lost from a solar age, laughing and crying at the same time. And this is not achieved by the philosophers of the intellect or the beings 'of the flock'. For to achieve this, the Circle will have to be traversed for several eternities, again at the Gateway of the Moment, already predestined at noon. In addition, the doctrine of the Eternal Return is selective. As the initiatory practice Tantric Panshatattva is not for the paśu [animal], but only for some heroes or viryas, thus the Noon is reached by the 'Lords of the Earth' and by the poets of the Will to Power, predestined in a mysterious way to perform the Superman, that individualistic and aristocratic mutation. The 'herd', the vulgar, has nothing to do with all this, including here the scientists, technologists and most philosophers, politicians and government of the Kaliyuga. Nietzsche's description of the Eternal Return is found in some aphorisms that precede 'The Gay Science', Joyful Science, using Nietzsche the Provencal term, Occitan, from 'Gay'. Joyful Science will be that of the one who has accepted the Eternal Return of all things and has transmuted the values. The one of Superman. There is also a description in the schemes of 'The Will to Power'. In they all take hold, with genius that transcends their time, of the scientific knowledge and the mechanics of the time, which does not lose validity to the doctrine, let us say better to the revealed Idea, to the Revelation that, of somehow, it was also in the Pythagoreans, in their Aryan-Hyperborean form, differentiating itself from other elaborations made in the millennia of the East. Also would have been veiled in the Persian reformer Zarathustra. We are going to reproduce what Nietzsche has written about the Eternal Return. In the schemes of 'The Will to Power', he says: 'Everything returns and returns eternally; We can not escape this.

The other one, the one called Borges, is the one things happen to. I walk through the streets of Buenos Aires and stop for a moment, perhaps mechanically now, to look at the arch of an entrance hall and the grillwork on the gate; I know of Borges from the mail and see his name on a list of professors or in a biographical dictionary. I like hourglasses, maps, eighteenth-century typography, the taste of coffee and the prose of Stevenson; he shares these preferences, but in a vain way that turns them into the attributes of an actor. It would be an exaggeration to say that ours is a hostile relationship; I live, let myself go on living, so that Borges may contrive his literature, and this literature justifies me. It is no effort for me to confess that he has achieved some valid pages, but those pages cannot save me, perhaps because what is good belongs to no one, not even to him, but rather to the language and to tradition. Besides, I am destined to perish, definitively, and only some instant of myself can survive in him. Little by little, I am giving over everything to him, though I am quite aware of his perverse custom of falsifying and magnifying things. Spinoza knew that all things long to persist in their being; the stone eternally wants to be a stone and the tiger a tiger. I shall remain in Borges, not in myself (if it is true that I am someone), but I recognize myself less in his books than in many others or in the laborious strumming of a guitar. Years ago I tried to free myself from him and went from the mythologies of the suburbs to the games with time and infinity, but those games belong to Borges now and I shall have to imagine other things. Thus my life is a flight and I lose everything and everything belongs to oblivion, or to him. I do not know which of us has written this page.

The Thirty-three Rules • Every negotiation is an agreement between two or more parties with all parties having the right to veto—the right to say “no.” • Your job is not to be liked. It is to be respected and effective. • Results are not valid goals. • Money has nothing to do with a valid mission and purpose. • Never, ever, spill your beans in the lobby—or anywhere else. • Never enter a negotiation—never make a phone call—without a valid agenda. • The only valid goals are those you can control: behavior and activity. • Mission and purpose must be set in the adversary’s world; our world must be secondary. • Spend maximum time on payside activity and minimum time on nonpayside activity. • You do not need it. You only want it. • No saving. You cannot save the adversary. • Only one person in a negotiation can feel okay. That person is the adversary. • All action—all decision—begins with vision. Without vision, there is no action. • Always show respect to the blocker. • All agreements must be clarified point by point and sealed three times (using 3+). • The clearer the picture of pain, the easier the decision-making process. • The value of the negotiation increases by multiples as time, energy, money, and emotion are spent. • No talking. • Let the adversary save face at all times. • The greatest presentation you will ever give is the one your adversary will never see. • A negotiation is only over when we want it to be over. • “No” is good, “yes” is bad, “maybe” is worse. • Absolutely no closing. • Dance with the tiger. • Our greatest strength is our greatest weakness (Emerson). • Paint the pain. • Mission and purpose drive everything. • Decisions are 100 percent emotional. • Interrogative-led questions drive vision. • Nurture. • No assumptions. No expectations. Only blank slate. • Who are the decision makers? Do you know all of them? • Pay forward.

SYNCHRONICITY 'The earth is alive, and it feels with you. It follows your footsteps, your search, with equal anxiety, because it will be transfigured in your triumph. The end of Kaliyuga and the entry into a new Golden Age depend on the results of your war. The earth by itself cannot finish the work that Nature leaves incomplete. Today the earth has joined forces with man in his destructive passion. The great catastrophe will occur in the first years of the Age of Aquarius. But if you can find the entrance to the Invisible Double of this earth, fulfilling the mystery of 'loveless A-Mor', the volcanoes will become calm, the earthquake will cease and the catastrophe will be avoided. 'There is an essential 'synchronicity' between the soul and the landscape. What you achieve in yourself will have repercussions in even the remotest corner of the universe, like the ringing of a bell which announces a triumph or a defeat, producing irreversible effects in a secret centre where Destiny acts. The Archetype is indivisible and, if you once confront it in an essential manner, the effects are universal and valid for all eternity. The old Chinese saying expresses it well: 'If a man, sitting in his room, thinks the right thoughts, he will be heard thousands of leagues away.' And the alchemical saying, too: 'It doesn't matter how alone you are. If you do true work, unknown friends will come to your aid.' 'What I have called "synchronicity', Nietzsche called 'lucky occurrences filled with meaning'. It becomes a poetic dialogue, a concerto for two violins, between the man-magician and Nature. The world presents you with a 'lucky occurrence filled with meaning', it hands you a subtle, almost secret message, something which happens without apparent reason, a-causal, but which you feel is full of meaning. This being exactly what the world is looking for, that you should extract that meaning from it, which you alone are capable of seeing, because it 'synchronises', it fully coincides with your immediate state of mind, with an event in your life, so that it is able to transform itself, with your assistance, into legend and destiny. A lucky occurrence which transformed itself into Destiny. And once you have achieved this, everything will appear to become the same as before, as if nothing had happened. Nevertheless, everything has changed fundamentally and for all time, although the only ones to know it will be you and the earth — which is now your earth, your world, since it has given itself up to you so that you can make it fruitful. 'The earth has made itself invisible inside you', as Rilke would say, it has become an individualised universe inside you. And although perhaps nothing may have changed, 'it might seem as if it were so, it might seem as if it were so', to use your own words. And you will be a creative God of the world; because you have conceived a Non-Existent Flower. You have given a meaning to your flower.

Everything is going to be alright" we often say to ourselves or to others - when we are faced with problems, before falling asleep, after we have been disappointed. "Things may be unpleasant and difficult at the moment, but in the end everything is going to be alright." As far as the animals are concerned, nothing is going to be alright! Everything is bad, getting worse and the end will be more terrible than all fearful anticipations: on the death transport, on the slaughterhouse floor, on the chair of torture. "Everything is going to be alright!" This pacifying phrase for human beings is not valid for animals, because we have transformed their world into a singular hell. What we invented in horror movies or psychological thrillers to send pleasant shivers down our spine, is what animals are subjected to in reality: everywhere, continuously, in our midst, at this very moment - right now. Everybody knows, everybody remains silent, nobody takes action. Can it go on like this? It must not go on like this! Anyone who feels bound in earnest by any moral principles at all has the absolute duty to stand up against these crimes, which are in utter contradiction to every kind of morality.

It is fatally easy, under the conditions of the modern world, for a writer of genius to conceive of himself as a Messiah. Other writers, indeed, may have had profound insights before him; but we readily believe that everything is relative to its period of society, and that these insights have now lost their validity; a new generation is a new world, so there is always a chance, if not of delivering a wholly new gospel, of delivering one as good as new. Or the messiahship may take the form of revealing for the first time the gospel of some dead sage, which no one has understood before; which owing to the backward and confused state of men's minds has lain unknown to this very moment; or it may even go back to the lost Atlantis and the ineffable wisdom of primitive peoples. A writer who is fired with such a conviction is likely to have some devoted disciples; but for posterity he is liable to become, what he will be for the majority of his contemporaries, merely one among many entertainers. And the pity is that the man may have had something to say of the greatest importance: but to announce, as your own discovery, some truth long known to mankind, is to secure immediate attention at the price of ultimate neglect.

The contemporary Christian Church, precisely, has understood them in this' 'wrong way, to the letter, 'like the Jews,' exoterically, not esoterically. Nevertheless to say 'like the Jews' is an error. One would have to say 'as the Jews want.' Because they also possess an exotericism, for their masses, represented by the Torah and Talmud, and an esotericism, in the Cabala (which means: 'Received Tradition'), in the Zohar ('brightness'), the Merkaba or Chariot being the most secret part of the Cabala which only initiated rabbis know and use as the powerful tool of their magic. We have already said that the Cabala reached them from elsewhere, like everything else, in the Middle Ages, even though they tell us otherwise, using and transforming it in concordance with their Archetype. The Hasidim, from Poland, represent an exclusively esoteric sect of Judaism. Islam also has its esoteric magic, represented by Sufism and the sect of the Assassins, Hassanists, oflran. They interpret the Koran symbolically. And it was because of contact with this sect of the 'Old Man of the Mountain' that the Templars felt compelled to secede more and more from the direction of Rome, centering themselves in their Esoteric Kristianity and Mystery of the Gral. This was also why Rome destroyed them, like the esoteric Cathars (katharos = pure in Greek), the Bogomils, the Manichees and the gnostics. In the Church of Rome, called Catholic, there only remains a soulless ritual of the Mass, as a liturgical shell that no longer reaches the Symbol, which no longer touches it, no longer puts it into action. The Nordic contribution has been lost, destroyed by prejudice and the ethnological persecution of Nordicism, Germanism and the complete surrender to Judaism. Zen Buddhism preserves the esotericism of Buddha. In Japan Shinto and Zen are practiced by a racially superior warrior caste, the Samurai. The most esoteric side of Hinduism is found in Tantrism, especially in the Kaula or Kula Order. So understood, esotericism is what goes beyond the exterior form and the masses, the physical, and puts an elite in contact with invisible superior forces. In my case, the condition that paralysed me in the midst of dreaming and left me without means to influence the phenomena. The visible is symbol of invisible forces (Archetypes, Gods). By means of an esoteric knowledge, of an initiation in this knowledge, a hierarchic minority can make contact with these invisible forces, being able to act on the Symbol, dynamizing and controlling the physical phenomena that incarnate them. In my case: to come to control the involuntary process which, without knowing how, was controlling me, to be able to guide it, to check or avoid it. Jung referred to this when he said 'if someone wisely faces the Archetype, in whatever place in the world, he acquires universal validity because the Archetype is one and indivisible'. And the means to reach this spiritual world, 'on the other side of the mirror,' is Magic, Rite, Ritual, Ceremony. All religions have possessed them, even the Christian, as we have said. And the Rite is not something invented by humans but inspired by 'those from beyond,' Jung would say by the Collective Unconscious.

The Hatter To understand what they did to the Hatter, I must first tell you about people who know how to play with your brokenness like it is a fidget spinner without so much as touching your skin—a form of abuse known as gaslighting.   You say it happened, they say it did not.   You say it had to, they say it cannot.   They pull at a thread of pain left by someone in your mind, and sew an entire ghost out of you.   Build you a dark wonderland and ask you to call it home. Tell you, ‘Why can’t you just be happy?’ And you cannot because happiness in this story is a queen you do not trust being built from your own delusions.   When this happens, you are like the Hatter. Trapped here in this fairytale world, half mad because someone you love keeps lying to you. Is this rain, dear? No it isn’t, it’s a raven.   Is this a door? No, it is a writing desk.   Is this my mind? No, it is now my rabbit hole, and I’m going to make you fall so far down there is no way out.   This is why the raven becomes like a writing desk, nonsensical riddles and memories become valid, nothing makes sense anymore anyway.   You start wondering if anything you ever thought happened to you actually happened to you and this is their violence. This is their abuse. It has left bruises and gashes along your brain that no one else knows are there.   Doubting yourself is now a reflex. Trusting yourself is no longer muscle memory but a long, strenuous process.   They called the Hatter completely mad. Because he is cursed to both remember and to forget. They call me mad too because my curse is to heal through remembering everything you tried to make me forget.

When discussing the topic of substance abuse with kids, I explain that doing drugs in order to be high and happy means that people try to support being by doing. However, being is “bigger” than doing. I validate that people who use substances know on some level that they need to take care of their being but they have the order reversed because doing can never support being simply because the “smaller” thing can never support the “bigger” thing. It is as absurd as trying to support silence by increasing the noise. The right order of things is that being supports doing and doing needs to serve being. In chess, without the King, the other pieces would all be “dead”, so their existence is supported by the King, but they need to serve the King with their capacity for action in order to have a good game. But how do we begin to honor being if we are emotionally distressed or chemically dependent? We need to accept whatever facet of being we are going through—if we are sad, we need to experience our sadness and not run from it; if we are angry, we need to go through it without acting heedlessly; if we are scared, we have to pay attention to our fear and the reasons for it. Everything we go through is a message of being, and we need to decipher the message rather than run from it. I need to stress here the importance of learning to endure distress and let our emotions run their course without making a bad situation worse. The addicted brain needs to endure strong cravings for several years until the chemically reinforced neural pathways gradually subside in the absence of continued reinforcement. Here the words of the great poet and spiritual teacher Rumi come to mind: “Of all the cures God has provided, patience is the best.

The other one, the one called Borges, is the one things happen to. I walk through the streets of Buenos Aires and stop for a moment, perhaps mechanically now, to look at the arch of an entrance hall and the grillwork on the gate; I know of Borges from the mail and see his name on a list of professors or in a biographical dictionary. I like hourglasses, maps, eighteenth-century typography, the taste of coffee and the prose of Stevenson; he shares these preferences, but in a vain way that turns them into the attributes of an actor. It would be an exaggeration to say that ours is a hostile relationship; I live, let myself go on living, so that Borges may contrive his literature, and this literature justifies me. It is no effort for me to confess that he has achieved some valid pages, but those pages cannot save me, perhaps because what is good belongs to no one, not even to him, but rather to the language and to tradition. Besides, I am destined to perish, definitively, and only some instant of myself can survive in him. Little by little, I am giving over everything to him, though I am quite aware of his perverse custom of falsifying and magnifying things. Spinoza knew that all things long to persist in their being; the stone eternally wants to be a stone and the tiger a tiger. I shall remain in Borges, not in myself (if it is true that I am someone), but I recognize myself less in his books than in many others or in the laborious strumming of a guitar. Years ago I tried to free myself from him and went from the mythologies of the suburbs to the games with time and infinity, but those games belong to Borges now and I shall have to imagine other things. Thus my life is a flight and I lose everything and everything belongs to oblivion, or to him. I do not know which of us has written this page.

This reaction to the work was obviously a misunderstanding. It ignores the fact that the future Buddha was also of noble origins, that he was the son of a king and heir to the throne and had been raised with the expectation that one day he would inherit the crown. He had been taught martial arts and the art of government, and having reached the right age, he had married and had a son. All of these things would be more typical of the physical and mental formation of a future samurai than of a seminarian ready to take holy orders. A man like Julius Evola was particularly suitable to dispel such a misconception. He did so on two fronts in his Doctrine: on the one hand, he did not cease to recall the origins of the Buddha, Prince Siddhartha, who was destined to the throne of Kapilavastu: on the other hand, he attempted to demonstrate that Buddhist asceticism is not a cowardly resignation before life's vicissitudes, but rather a struggle of a spiritual kind, which is not any less heroic than the struggle of a knight on the battlefield. As Buddha himself said (Mahavagga, 2.15): 'It is better to die fighting than to live as one vanquished.' This resolution is in accord with Evola's ideal of overcoming natural resistances in order to achieve the Awakening through meditation; it should he noted, however, that the warrior terminology is contained in the oldest writings of Buddhism, which are those that best reflect the living teaching of the master. Evola works tirelessly in his hook to erase the Western view of a languid and dull doctrine that in fact was originally regarded as aristocratic and reserved for real 'champions.' After Schopenhauer, the unfounded idea arose in Western culture that Buddhism involved a renunciation of the world and the adoption of a passive attitude: 'Let things go their way; who cares anyway.' Since in this inferior world 'everything is evil,' the wise person is the one who, like Simeon the Stylite, withdraws, if not to the top of a pillar; at least to an isolated place of meditation. Moreover, the most widespread view of Buddhists is that of monks dressed in orange robes, begging for their food; people suppose that the only activity these monks are devoted to is reciting memorized texts, since they shun prayers; thus, their religion appears to an outsider as a form of atheism. Evola successfully demonstrates that this view is profoundly distorted by a series of prejudices. Passivity? Inaction? On the contrary, Buddha never tired of exhorting his disciples to 'work toward victory'; he himself, at the end of his life, said with pride: katam karaniyam, 'done is what needed to he done!' Pessimism? It is true that Buddha, picking up a formula of Brahmanism, the religion in which he had been raised prior to his departure from Kapilavastu, affirmed that everything on earth is 'suffering.' But he also clarified for us that this is the case because we are always yearning to reap concrete benefits from our actions. For example, warriors risk their lives because they long for the pleasure of victory and for the spoils, and yet in the end they are always disappointed: the pillaging is never enough and what has been gained is quickly squandered. Also, the taste of victory soon fades away. But if one becomes aware of this state of affairs (this is one aspect of the Awakening), the pessimism is dispelled since reality is what it is, neither good nor bad in itself; reality is inscribed in Becoming, which cannot be interrupted. Thus, one must live and act with the awareness that the only thing that matters is each and every moment. Thus, duty (dhamma) is claimed to be the only valid reference point: 'Do your duty,' that is. 'let your every action he totally disinterested.

The world can be validly construed as a forum for action, as well as a place of things. We describe the world as a place of things, using the formal methods of science. The techniques of narrative, however – myth, literature, and drama – portray the world as a forum for action. The two forms of representation have been unnecessarily set at odds, because we have not yet formed a clear picture of their respective domains. The domain of the former is the 'objective world' – what is, from the perspective of intersubjective perception. The domain of the latter is 'the world of value' – what is and what should be, from the perspective of emotion and action. The world as forum for action is 'composed,' essentially, of three constituent elements, which tend to manifest themselves in typical patterns of metaphoric representation. First is unexplored territory – the Great Mother, nature, creative and destructive, source and final resting place of all determinate things. Second is explored territory – the Great Father, culture, protective and tyrannical, cumulative ancestral wisdom. Third is the process that mediates between unexplored and explored territory – the Divine Son, the archetypal individual, creative exploratory 'Word' and vengeful adversary. We are adapted to this 'world of divine characters,' much as the 'objective world.' The fact of this adaptation implies that the environment is in 'reality' a forum for action, as well as a place of things. Unprotected exposure to unexplored territory produces fear. The individual is protected from such fear as a consequence of 'ritual imitation of the Great Father' – as a consequence of the adoption of group identity, which restricts the meaning of things, and confers predictability on social interactions. When identification with the group is made absolute, however – when everything has to be controlled, when the unknown is no longer allowed to exist – the creative exploratory process that updates the group can no longer manifest itself. This 'restriction of adaptive capacity' dramatically increases the probability of social aggression and chaos. Rejection of the unknown is tantamount to 'identification with the devil,' the mythological counterpart and eternal adversary of the world-creating exploratory hero. Such rejection and identification is a consequence of Luciferian pride, which states: all that I know is all that is necessary to know. This pride is totalitarian assumption of omniscience – is adoption of 'God’s place' by 'reason' – is something that inevitably generates a state of personal and social being indistinguishable from hell. This hell develops because creative exploration – impossible, without (humble) acknowledgment of the unknown – constitutes the process that constructs and maintains the protective adaptive structure that gives life much of its acceptable meaning. 'Identification with the devil' amplifies the dangers inherent in group identification, which tends of its own accord towards pathological stultification. Loyalty to personal interest – subjective meaning – can serve as an antidote to the overwhelming temptation constantly posed by the possibility of denying anomaly. Personal interest – subjective meaning – reveals itself at the juncture of explored and unexplored territory, and is indicative of participation in the process that ensures continued healthy individual and societal adaptation. Loyalty to personal interest is equivalent to identification with the archetypal hero – the 'savior' – who upholds his association with the creative 'Word' in the face of death, and in spite of group pressure to conform. Identification with the hero serves to decrease the unbearable motivational valence of the unknown; furthermore, provides the individual with a standpoint that simultaneously transcends and maintains the group.

Delta Airlines Ticket Name Change Marriage -Emergency Support Changing the name on your Delta Airlines ticket due to marriage +1(844)634-0511 is a process that requires providing legal documentation, +1(844)634-0511 such as a marriage certificate. To begin, immediately contact Delta Airlines customer service at +1(844)634-0511 to notify them of the name change request. When you call +1(844)634-0511, the customer service representative will assist you in submitting the necessary documents, such as a marriage certificate, to validate the name change. +1(844)634-0511 This is particularly important if you’ve recently married and need to update your ticket before your next flight. +1(844)634-0511 Delta Airlines is committed to ensuring your booking is correct, but having your supporting documents ready can speed up the process. If you are making a minor name correction, +1(844)634-0511 such as a simple spelling mistake in your first or last name, customer service can help resolve this quickly. However, if you’re making a full name change due to marriage, +1(844)634-0511 you will likely need to cancel your current ticket and rebook under the new name. In this case, contacting customer service at +1(844)634-0511 immediately will allow you to discuss your options, including whether your current ticket is refundable or if there are additional fees involved. It’s also important to confirm that your boarding pass +1(844)634-0511 reflects the new name after the change. You can call +1(844)634-0511 to confirm that your updated reservation has been processed. Delta Airlines customer service +1(844)634-0511 is always ready to assist you in making sure that everything is in order for your flight, including any changes to your reservation or ticket. Remember, making a name change due to marriage should be done as soon as possible to avoid any last-minute issues at check-in. Reach out to Delta Airlines customer service at +1(844)634-0511 to ensure your name is updated accurately and promptly on your ticket.

beyond them. The Six Diseases If we want to look at how we practice all forms of rivalry, there are six diseases my father wrote about, all of which stem from the desire we have to win at all costs. These diseases rely on being in competition, which is typically where we go in a relationship the moment any discord pops up. When we relate to others in these ways, we are disconnecting from them and disconnecting from our true selves in order to access some form of outside validation. In other words, there is no relationship, no collaboration, no cocreation. There is only the victor and the loser. The Six Diseases are: The desire for victory I have to be the winner. If I don’t win, I’m a loser. If I win, everyone else is a loser. The desire to resort to technical cunning I rely on the power of my wits to show you how great I am. Who cares about people or their feelings as long as everyone can see how clever I am? The desire to display all that has been learned Check me out. I know lots of things. I can speak at length about anything. It doesn’t matter what anyone else has to say (especially if it’s dumb). The desire to awe the enemy I am a force to be reckoned with. Look out! I will wow you to get your approval even if I have to do something shocking and wild to get your attention. The desire to play the passive role I am so easy to get along with. Who wouldn’t like me? I am so unobtrusive and sweet. I will put anything that’s important to me aside to make sure that you see how likeable and wonderful I am. How could you not like me when I sacrifice everything just for you? The desire to rid oneself of whatever disease one is affected by I am not okay as I am. I will perform constant self-work and read as many books as I can and take so many classes to make myself good that you will see that I am always trying to be a good person even if I continue to do lots of shitty things. I know I’m not okay as I am. And I know you know that I know I’m not okay as I am, which makes it okay not to get truly better as long as it looks like I’m trying.

The narcissistic mother will manipulate other family members to gang up against you by focusing on everything that’s wrong with you. This conveniently takes the focus away from the real perpetrator, which is of course her. It’s interesting to think about the manipulation that’s actually going on. So if you have been labelled as the black sheep and that has been your permanent role in the family, it actually allows all the other family members to start feeling better about themselves. They actually start to believe that they are healthier and more obedient to the narcissistic mother than you, and again this creates a division within the family. Another important point is that if a child is scapegoated from an early age, he or she may fully internalize all of their narcissistic mother’s criticism and shame. This means that the scapegoats develop this harsh inner critic that will continue that inner dialogue that constantly reminds them of how bad and flawed they are. I guess you could call that “inner scapegoating,” and it is extremely toxic to a young impressionable child whose identity is still being formed. So, the scapegoat may struggle with low self-esteem and often continues to feel deeply inadequate and unlovable. Adult scapegoat children also tend to suppress a huge amount of abandonment anxiety because they were emotionally or even physically abandoned by the narcissistic mother over and over again. Adult scapegoat children therefore become super sensitive to observing any potential signs of approval or disapproval. These are all important aspects of the profound impact that a toxic family dynamic may continue to have on adult relationships. Perhaps you may still have issues with authority. Maybe you’re still used to justifying yourself or somehow proving your worth. This is an unconscious pattern that you may still not be aware of and that you are perpetuating because you don’t realize how powerful these dysfunctional family dynamics still are. And once you wake up and understand you can let go of that label, you can break that pattern by choosing to think and behave completely different. You can learn to choose your battles and do not always have to be defensive. You do not always have to feel victimized. You need to become more self-aware and notice if you are still trying to get your parents’ approval or validation. Maturing into adulthood means that you may need to understand that you may never have a healthy relationship with an intentional perpetrator of abuse. You need to process your feelings of frustration, loneliness, rage, and grief.

The Eternal Return has certainly not been thought by philosophers or by those who are concerned about Nietzsche in the contemporary history of ideas, and this because the Eternal Return can not be thought of. It is a revelation that presents itself next to the Silvaplana rock, or on the threshold of the Gateway of the Moment, where the Two Ways meet. You will have to travel step by step along the path of Western yoga that Nietzsche rediscovered and practiced, putting his feet in the tracks that he left in the paths of the high peaks, relive their great pains and divine glories, reaching to reach similar tonalities of the soul, to be possessed by Dionysus and his ancient drunkenness, Luciferian, that makes dance in the solitude of forests and lost from a solar age, laughing and crying at the same time. And this is not achieved by the philosophers of the intellect or the beings 'of the flock'. For to achieve this, the Circle will have to be traversed for several eternities, again at the Gateway of the Moment, already predestined at noon. In addition, the doctrine of the Eternal Return is selective. As the initiatory practice Tantric Panshatattva is not for the paśu [animal], but only for some heroes or viryas, thus the Noon is reached by the 'Lords of the Earth' and by the poets of the Will to Power, predestined in a mysterious way to perform the Superman, that individualistic and aristocratic mutation. The 'herd', the vulgar, has nothing to do with all this, including here the scientists, technologists and most philosophers, politicians and government of the Kaliyuga. Nietzsche's description of the Eternal Return is found in some aphorisms that precede 'The Gay Science', Joyful Science, using Nietzsche the Provencal term, Occitan, from 'Gay'. Joyful Science will be that of the one who has accepted the Eternal Return of all things and has transmuted the values. The one of Superman. There is also a description in the schemes of 'The Will to Power'. In they all take hold, with genius that transcends their time, of the scientific knowledge and the mechanics of the time, which does not lose validity to the doctrine, let us say better to the revealed Idea, to the Revelation that, of somehow, it was also in the Pythagoreans, in their Aryan-Hyperborean form, differentiating itself from other elaborations made in the millennia of the East. Also would have been veiled in the Persian reformer Zarathustra. We are going to reproduce what Nietzsche has written about the Eternal Return. In the schemes of 'The Will to Power', he says: 'Everything returns and returns eternally; We can not escape this.

The Eternal Return has certainly not been thought by philosophers or by those who are concerned about Nietzsche in the contemporary history of ideas, and this because the Eternal Return can not be thought of. It is a revelation that presents itself next to the Silvaplana rock, or on the threshold of the Gateway of the Moment, where the Two Ways meet. You will have to travel step by step along the path of Western yoga that Nietzsche rediscovered and practiced, putting his feet in the tracks that he left in the paths of the high peaks, relive their great pains and divine glories, reaching to reach similar tonalities of the soul, to be possessed by Dionysus and his ancient drunkenness, Luciferian, that makes dance in the solitude of forests and lost from a solar age, laughing and crying at the same time. And this is not achieved by the philosophers of the intellect or the beings 'of the flock'. For to achieve this, the Circle will have to be traversed for several eternities, again at the Gateway of the Moment, already predestined at noon. In addition, the doctrine of the Eternal Return is selective. As the initiatory practice Tantric Panshatattva is not for the paśu [animal], but only for some heroes or viryas, thus the Noon is reached by the 'Lords of the Earth' and by the poets of the Will to Power, predestined in a mysterious way to perform the Superman, that individualistic and aristocratic mutation. The 'herd', the vulgar, has nothing to do with all this, including here the scientists, technologists and most philosophers, politicians and government of the Kaliyuga. Nietzsche's description of the Eternal Return is found in some aphorisms that precede 'The Gay Science', Joyful Science, using Nietzsche the Provencal term, Occitan, from 'Gay'. Joyful Science will be that of the one who has accepted the Eternal Return of all things and has transmuted the values. The one of Superman. There is also a description in the schemes of 'The Will to Power'. In they all take hold, with genius that transcends their time, of the scientific knowledge and the mechanics of the time, which does not lose validity to the doctrine, let us say better to the revealed Idea, to the Revelation that, of somehow, it was also in the Pythagoreans, in their Aryan-Hyperborean form, differentiating itself from other elaborations made in the millennia of the East. Also would have been veiled in the Persian reformer Zarathustra. We are going to reproduce what Nietzsche has written about the Eternal Return. In the schemes of 'The Will to Power', he says: 'Everything returns and returns eternally; We can not escape this.

Until knowledge becomes part of you, it is not possible to talk about awareness, or true understanding. Everything must come from and into an organism. Theories are only valid when made organic — ”organic” as in "part of the body". The knowledge that has to be learned and followed like a discipline is useless. It doesn't matter which amount of knowledge you absorb or in which variety. Knowledge can’t be remembered all the time in the same proportion that is kept, not all of it, and not all of it at the same time. As a matter of fact, when knowledge is not assimilated above personal interests, that same knowledge is already corrupted. When knowledge is seen as a means to a goal, either it is in obtaining something from the outside world, or passing some test, this knowledge has not become organic but merely used as a tool. That's why so many people avoid being confronted with their ignorance and react angrily when faced with their contradictions, which is quite obvious when we compare what they learn and what they say. You see this everywhere, in teachers, politicians, religious groups, and so on. And then you wonder why are people not honest. But they can’t understand honesty as much as they can’t understand their own ignorance. The stupid are not aware they are stupid, and that’s what really makes them stupid. When someone is too stupid, ignorance is replaced by arrogance. And then this person feels like the world is a bit threat to survival at an individual level. We call this attitude being egotistic. But you can’t stop being an egotistic when suppressing your emotions, or imagining that everyone is a source of negative energy but you. As a matter of fact, you commonly see the egotistic drop into apathy precisely because they confuse the work they must do on themselves with the anger they feel for the world as a whole. Have you ever noticed how easily people turn to anger when you ask them a question? That’s a reaction of someone moving from apathy to fear. On the surface this person is acting like a rude individual, but the emotions behind this behavior are those one feels when watching a horror movie. They are afraid of their own feelings, and project this fear as an aggression. Now comes the interesting part: Who are they attacking? They are attacking precisely the one that can help them, because only such individual will ask the right questions. An individual on apathy and lack of interest, can’t ask anything that is interesting or motivating. So we come to an interesting paradox in society, that those who can uplift others, end up being perceived as a threat to them. And that’s the simplest way to explain insanity.

A:Surely you· know that one can read a book many times-perhaps you almost know it by heart, and nevertheless it can be that, when you look again at the lines before you, certain things appear new or even new thoughts occur to you that you did not have before. Every word can work productively in your spirit. And finally if you have once left the book for a week and you take it up again after your spirit has experienced various different changes, then a number ofthings will dawn on you. On the higher levels of insight into divine thoughts, you recognize that the sequence of words has more than one valid meaning. Only to the all-knowing is it given to know all the meanings of the sequence of words. Increasingly we try to grasp a few more meanings." .... I: "But Philo Judeaus, if this is who you mean, was a serious philosopher and a great thinker. Even John the Evangelist included some of Philo's thoughts in the gospe!." A: "You are right. It is to Philo's credit that he furnished language like so many other philosophers. He belongs to the language artists. But words should not become Gods." I: "I fail to understand you here. Does it not say in the gospel according to John: God was the Word. It appears to make quite explicit the point which you have just now rejected." A: "Guard against being a slave to words. Here is the gospel: read from that passage where it says: In him was the life. "What does John say there?" I: "'And life was the light of men and the light shines in the darkness and the darkness has not understood it. But it became a person sent from God, by the name of John, who came as a witness and to be a witness of the light. The genuine light, which That is what I readh ere. But what do you make of this?" A: "I ask you, was this AorOL [Logos] a concept, a word? It was a light, indeed a man, and lived among men. You see, Philo only lent John the word so that John would have at his disposal the word 'AorOL' alongside the word 'light' to describe the son of man. John gave to living men the meaning of the AorOL, but Philo gave AorOL as the dead concept that usurped life, even the divine life. Through this the dead does not gain life, and the living is killed. And this was also my atrocious error." I:"Iseewhatyoumean.Thisthoughtisnewtomeandseems worth consideration. Until now it always seemed to me / as if it were exactly that which was meaningful in John, namely that the son of man is the AorOL, in that he thus elevates the lower to the higher spirit, to the world of the AorOL. But you lead me to see the matter conversely; namely that John brings the meaning of the AorOL down to man." A: "I learned to see that John has in fact even done the great service of having brought the meaning of the AorOL up to man." I: "You have peculiar insights that stretch my curiosity to the utmost. How is that? Do you think that the human stands higher than the logos?" A: "I want to answer this question within the scope of your understanding: if the human God had not become important above everything, he would not have appeared as the son in the flesh, but as Logos.

Today the cloud is the central metaphor of the internet: a global system of great power and energy that nevertheless retains the aura of something noumenal and numnious, something almost impossible to grasp. We connect to the cloud; we work in it; we store and retrieve stuff from it; we think through it. We pay for it and only notice it when it breaks. It is something we experience all the time without really understanding what it is or how it works. It is something we are training ourselves to rely upon with only the haziest of notions about what is being entrusted, and what it is being entrusted to. Downtime aside, the first criticism of this cloud is that it is a very bad metaphor. The cloud is not weightless; it is not amorphous, or even invisible, if you know where to look for it. The cloud is not some magical faraway place, made of water vapor and radio waves, where everything just works. It is a physical infrastructure consisting of phone lines, fibre optics, satellites, cables on the ocean floor, and vast warehouses filled with computers, which consume huge amounts of water and energy and reside within national and legal jurisdictions. The cloud is a new kind of industry, and a hungry one. The cloud doesn't just have a shadow; it has a footprint. Absorbed into the cloud are many of the previously weighty edifices of the civic sphere: the places where we shop, bank, socialize, borrow books, and vote. Thus obscured, they are rendered less visible and less amenable to critique, investigation, preservation and regulation. Another criticism is that this lack of understanding is deliberate. There are good reasons, from national security to corporate secrecy to many kinds of malfeasance, for obscuring what's inside the cloud. What evaporates is agency and ownership: most of your emails, photos, status updates, business documents, library and voting data, health records, credit ratings, likes, memories, experiences, personal preferences, and unspoken desires are in the cloud, on somebody else's infrastructure. There's a reason Google and Facebook like to build data centers in Ireland (low taxes) and Scandinavia (cheap energy and cooling). There's a reason global, supposedly post-colonial empires hold onto bits of disputed territory like Diego Garcia and Cyprus, and it's because the cloud touches down in these places, and their ambiguous status can be exploited. The cloud shapes itself to geographies of power and influence, and it serves to reinforce them. The cloud is a power relationship, and most people are not on top of it. These are valid criticisms, and one way of interrogating the cloud is to look where is shadow falls: to investigate the sites of data centers and undersea cables and see what they tell us about the real disposition of power at work today. We can seed the cloud, condense it, and force it to give up some of its stories. As it fades away, certain secrets may be revealed. By understanding the way the figure of the cloud is used to obscure the real operation of technology, we can start to understand the many ways in which technology itself hides its own agency - through opaque machines and inscrutable code, as well as physical distance and legal constructs. And in turn, we may learn something about the operation of power itself, which was doing this sort of thing long before it had clouds and black boxes in which to hide itself.

The oppressed person reaching out to you is already disadvantaged by the oppression they are trying to address. By tone policing, you are increasing that disadvantage by insisting that you get to determine if their grievances are valid and will only decide they are so if, on top of everything they are already enduring, they make the effort to prioritize your comfort. Whether you are consciously meaning to do this or not, this is the effect tone policing has on people of color.

The question of who created the Ultimate Creator is not valid since the Ultimate Creator is not a creature and needs not to be created. For someone to be the Ultimate Creator, He has to be someone beyond the constraints of this world and nature. If the premise is that the Ultimate Creator created everything and nothing exists independent of His will, then, the logical conclusion would be that He has to be an independent personality outside of the universe and have no constraints of laws governing this universe.

This is not all. Together with the absurdity proper to democratizing the marriage rite and imposing it on all, there is an inconsistency in Catholic doctrine when it claims that the rite, as well as being indissoluble, renders natural unions “sacred”—which represents one incongruence associating with another. Through precise, dogmatic premises, the “sacred” is here reduced to a mere manner of speech. It is well known that Christian and Catholic attitudes are characterized by the antithesis between “flesh” and spirit, by a theological hatred for sex, due to the illegitimate extension to ordinary life of a principle valid at best for a certain type of ascetic life. With sex being presented as something sinful, marriage has been conceived as a lesser evil, a concession to human weakness for those who cannot choose chastity as a way of life, and renounce sex. Not being able to ban sexuality altogether, Catholicism has tried to reduce it to a mere biological fact, allowing its use in marriage only for procreation. Unlike certain ancient traditions, Catholicism has recognized no higher value, not even a potential one, in the sexual experience taken in itself. There is lacking any basis for its transformation in the interests of a more intense life, to integrate and elevate the inner tension of two beings of different sexes, whereas it is in exactly these terms that one should conceive of a concrete “sacralization” of the union and the effect of a higher influence involved in the rite. On the other hand, since the marriage rite has been democratized, the situation could not be otherwise even if the premises were different; otherwise, it would be necessary to suppose an almost magical power in the rite to automatically elevate the sexual experiences of any couple to the level of a higher tension, of a transforming intoxication that alone could lift it beyond the “natural” plane. The sexual act would constitute the primary element, whereas procreation would appear absolutely secondary and belonging to the naturalistic plane. As a whole, whether through its conception of sexuality, or through its profanation of the marriage rite as something put in everyone’s reach and even rendered obligatory for any Catholic couple, religious marriage itself is reduced to the mere religious sanction of a profane, unbreakable contract. Thus the Catholic precepts about the relations between the sexes reduce everything to the plane of a restrained, bourgeois mediocrity: tamed, procreative animality within conformist limits that have not been fundamentally changed by certain hesitant, fringe concessions made for the sake of “updating” at the Second Vatican Council.

Over the past decade, everything has become politicized. Churches, universities, sports, food selection, movie awards shows, late-night comedy—they have all turned into political arenas. Except this was not politics as it is normally understood. Healthy societies produce the politics of distribution. How should the resources of the society be allocated? Unhappy societies produce the politics of recognition. Political movements these days are fueled largely by resentment, by a person or a group’s feelings that society does not respect or recognize them. The goal of political and media personalities is to produce episodes in which their side is emotionally validated and the other side is emotionally shamed. The person practicing the politics of recognition is not trying to formulate domestic policies or to address this or that social ill; he is trying to affirm his identity, to gain status and visibility, to find a way to admire himself. But, of course, the politics of recognition doesn’t actually give you community and connection. People join partisan tribes, but they are not in fact meeting together, serving one another, befriending one another. Politics doesn’t make you a better person; it’s about outer agitation, not inner formation. Politics doesn’t humanize. If you attempt to assuage your sadness, loneliness, or anomie through politics, it will do nothing more than land you in a world marked by a sadistic striving for domination. You may try to escape a world of isolation and moral meaninglessness, only to find yourself in the pulverizing destructiveness of the culture wars.

The path dips down to Gal Vihara: a wide, quiet, hollow, surrounded with trees. A low outcrop of rock, with a cave cut into it, and beside the cave a big seated Buddha on the left, a reclining Buddha on the right, and Ananda, I guess, standing by the head of the reclining Buddha. In the cave, another seated Buddha. The vicar general, shying away from "paganism." hangs back and sits under a tree reading the guidebook. I am able to approach the Buddhas barefoot and undisturbed, my feet in wet grass, wet sand. Then the silence of the extraordinary faces. The great smiles. Huge and yet subtle. Filled with every possibility, questioning nothing, knowing everything, rejecting nothing, the peace not of emotional resignation but of Madhyamika, of sunyata, that has seen through every question without trying to discredit anyone or anything - without refutation - without establishing some other argument. For the doctrinaire, the mind that needs well-established positions, such peace, such silence, can be frightening. I was knocked over with a rush of relief and thankfulness at the obvious clarity of the figures, the clarity and fluidity of shape and line, the design of the monumental bodies composed into the rock shape and landscape, figure, rock and tree. And the sweep of bare rock sloping away on the other side of the hollow, where you can go back and see different aspects of the figures. Looking at these figures I was suddenly, almost forcibly, jerked clean out of the habitual, half-tied vision of things, and an inner clearness, clarity, as if exploding from the rocks themselves, became evident and obvious. The queer evidence of the reclining figure, the smile, the sad smile of Ananda standing with arms folded (much more "imperative" than Da Vinci's Mona Lisa because completely simple and straightforward). The thing about all this is that there is no puzzle, no problem, and really no "mystery." All problems are resolved and everything is clear, simply because what matters is clear. The rock, all matter, all life, is charged with dharmakaya... everything is emptiness and everything is compassion. I don't know when in my life I have ever had such a sense of beauty and spiritual validity running together in one aesthetic illumination. Surely, with Mahabalipuram and Polonnaruwa my Asian pilgrimage has come clear and purified itself. I mean, I know and have seen what I was obscurely looking for. I don't know what else remains but I have now seen and have pierced through the surface and have got beyond the shadow and the disguise. This is Asia in its purity, not covered over with garbage, Asian or European or American, and it is clear, pure, complete. It says everything: it needs nothing. And because it needs nothing it can afford to be silent, unnoticed, undiscovered. It does not need to be discovered. It is we, Asians included, who need to discover it. The whole thing is very much a Zen Garden, a span of bareness and openness and evidence, and the great figures, motionless, yet with the lines in full movement, waves of vesture and bodily form, a beautiful and holy vision. The rest of the "city", the old palace complex, I had no time for. We just drove around the roads and saw the ruined shapes, and started on the long drive home to Kandy.

This principle means that in a purely legal sense, the Old Covenant that established Israel as a theocracy is finished and has been replaced by a New Covenant with the church. Everything under the Old Covenant is finished as far as having binding authority over the conscience. Because this is true, it follows that none of the theocratic laws of Israel can be used in the church in an absolute sense unless those laws are, in some sense, given validity in the New Testament.

In March 2016 and again in August of the same year, news of Chinese conglomerate SinoFortone offering hundreds of millions of pounds for a stake in the club was greeted with feverish anticipation on Merseyside. But FSG have not sold. Klopp’s circumspect view on a possible change of ownership might have partially informed their stance. When the link with China hit the headlines Klopp told the Americans explicitly that it was they who had his trust. ‘We chose Jürgen as manager, but we’re very conscious of the fact that this was a mutual decision, that he chose us, likewise,’ Gordon says. ‘I don’t want to use the word “legitimacy”, but his decision has validated everything that those of us that have been working on the football side of the club have been seeking to achieve.

To refuse to listen to someone’s cries for justice and equality until the request comes in a language you feel comfortable with is a way of asserting your dominance over them in the situation. The oppressed person reaching out to you is already disadvantaged by the oppression they are trying to address. By tone policing, you are increasing that disadvantage by insisting that you get to determine if their grievances are valid and will only decide they are so if, on top of everything they are already enduring, they make the effort to prioritize your comfort. Whether you are consciously meaning to do this or not, this is the effect tone policing has on people of color.

Scientists seek unique, correct theories, and if several theories seem plausible, all but one must be wrong, while engineers seek options for working designs, and if several options will work, success is assured. •​Scientists seek theories that apply across the widest possible range (the Standard Model applies to everything), while engineers seek concepts well-suited to particular domains (liquid-cooled nozzles for engines in liquid-fueled rockets). •​Scientists seek theories that make precise, hence brittle predictions (like Newton’s), while engineers seek designs that provide a robust margin of safety. •​In science a single failed prediction can disprove a theory, no matter how many previous tests it has passed, while in engineering one successful design can validate a concept, no matter how many previous versions have failed.

Now Where Do You Find Customers? When novice entrepreneurs search for opportunities, they too often look beyond their Zone of Influence. They think the action is happening somewhere else, in some other location or industry. But seasoned entrepreneurs almost always find and create opportunities within the context of who they are, what they know, and especially who they know. In each of the examples above, the business validation process begins with potential customers in the entrepreneur’s orbit. Actual people with names. Tribes you belong to or are interested in, most of whom are already self-organized online. People you know how to reach, today. Though it’s rarely a part of their official origin stories, the biggest companies in the world—even the viral apps now worth billions—started through personal networks and real human connections. Mark Zuckerberg started Facebook in a weekend by emailing friends to use it. Version 1 did well, validating it. And Microsoft started with Bill Gates building software for a guy in Albuquerque. He had a CUSTOMER FIRST. In the beginning, founders should reach out to their friends, their former colleagues, their communities. You may think your business is unique, but trust me, it’s not. Every successful business can start this way. For example, Anahita loves her dogs and wanted healthier snacks for them. She started taking her homemade organic dog treats to her local dog park. She would sell out every time. A year later she now has a store called the Barkery, a dog bakery. Before you even think about picking a business idea, make sure you have easy access to the people you want to help. An easy way to do this is to think about where you have easy access to a targeted group of people whom you really want to help—like, say, new moms in Austin, cyclists, freelance writers, and taco obsessives (like me!). CHALLENGE Top three groups. Let’s write out your top three groups to target. Who do you have easy access to that you’d be EXCITED to help? This can be your neighbors, colleagues, religious friends, golf buddies, cooking friends, etc. The better you understand your target group, the better you can speak to them. The more specifically you can speak to their problems, the better and easier you can sell (or test products). Note how this process prioritizes communication with people, through starting (taking the first iteration of your solution straight to customers) and asking (engaging them in a conversation to determine how your solution can best fix their problem). Business creation should always be a conversation! Nearly every impulse we have is to be tight with our ideas by doing more research, going off alone to build the perfect product—anything and everything to avoid the discomfort of asking for money. This is the validation shortcut. You have to learn to fight through this impulse. It won’t be easy, but it’ll be worth it.

Jesus will come! Not “may come,” “might come,” or “possibly could come.” Jesus will come! His promised return is not a nebulous, vapid, cross-your-fingers aspiration. It is a concrete, guaranteed appearance of our Savior. Jesus validated his return by vacating his tomb. This was the conviction of the apostle Paul: If there’s no resurrection for Christ, everything we’ve told you is smoke and mirrors, and everything you’ve staked your life on is smoke and mirrors. . . . If all we get out of Christ is a little inspiration for a few short years, we’re a pretty sorry lot. But the truth is that Christ has been raised up, the first in a long legacy of those who are going to leave the cemeteries. (1 Cor. 15:14, 19–20 MSG)

But when she's asleep he likes to sit down beside her bed and make one further attempt to get to the bottom of what has seemed to him the greatest riddle in all the history of mankind: how processes, circumstances, or events of a general nature--such as war, famine, or even a civil servant's salary that fails to increase along with the galloping inflation--can infiltrate a private face. Here they turn a few hairs gray, there devour a pair of lovely cheeks until the skin is stretched taut across angular jawbones; the secession of Hungary, say, might result in a pair of lips bitten raw in the case of one particular woman, perhaps even his own wife. In other words, there is a constant translation between far outside and deep within, it's just that a different vocabulary exists for each of us, which no doubt explains why it's never been noticed that this is a language in the first place--and in fact, the only language valid across the world and for all time. ... It feels to him as if the top layer is crumbling away all at once from everything he sees and encounters, a layer that once prevented him from comprehending, and finally he is able to recognize what lies below. Minds = landscapes, ... what a happy coincidence that these observations happened to fall into his hands: the hands of one who has taken it upon himself to investigate this primeval tongue ...

If the West once undermined and helped to ultimately defeat the USSR by uniting free market economics, cool culture, and democratic politics into one package (parliaments, investment banks, and abstract expressionism fused to defeat the Politburo, planned economics, and social realism), Surkov’s genius has been to tear those associations apart, to marry authoritarianism and modern art, to use the language of rights and representation to validate tyranny, to recut and paste democratic capitalism until it means the reverse of its original purpose.

Certainly, what Kant calls the transcendental reference, experience and object of experience are in a sense present in both opposed views of the nature of the subjective *a-priori*. In both cases the object must 'order itself' according to the rules of the knowing mind or its functions, irrespective of whether the specific function of cognition is based on a systematic construction, synthetization, formation of the object from 'given' sensational material or on a methodical selection-process (suppression, abstraction, disregard) imposed on a self-constituting object. For if the order of selection in which the fulness of the world, as it is in ipseity, reaches man (or a particular kind of man, e.g., a type of racial or cultural unity) is so governed that an object of essence *B* is only given when an object of essence *A* has already been given (if, that is to say, *A* has datum-priority over *B* in order of time―not necessarily in direct succession), then if an object *X* is simultaneously of essence *A* and *B*, everything which is true of *A* must necessarily be true of *X*―not vice versa. For example, if spatiality and extensity have strict perceptual priority over all essential properties of matter and corporeality, geometry must be strictly valid for all possible bodies. But the same principle, the applicability of geometry to all bodies without exception, would still hold good if Kant's doctrine were true―though it denies the very reality of extension and space, and explains the spatial form as merely a subjective aspect of the datum. Thus in both cases the transcendental validity of the so-called *a-priori*, even for the objects of experience, would persist, so that in itself it offers us *no* criterion of choice between one or other *hypothesis*―that which supposes a synthetic addition of the form on the part of the spontaneous mind, or the other, which postulates an ordered selection in conformity with foreknown essences." ―from_On the Eternal in Man_. The Nature of Philosophy, with a new introduction by Graham McAleer

4.2.2.1.4. Teaching That the Cognition That Negates the Existence of Objects Is a Valid Cognition "If valid cognition is not valid cognition, Isn't what is validated by it delusive? In true reality, the emptiness of entities Is therefore unjustified." [138]'-" [903] This verse states the objection. The opponents might say, "If you assert in your Centrist system that even all valid cognition-which is the means of evaluation-is not valid cognition, isn't a phenomenon that is validated by it delusive too? If one analyzes in accord with true Centrist analysis, emptiness is not established, and, in consequence, meditation on emptiness is unjustified as well." Without referring to an imputed entity, One cannot apprehend the lack of this entity. Therefore, the lack of a delusive entity Is clearly delusive [too]. [139] This verse teaches that [everything] is mere delusion. Without referring to-that is, without relying on-a mere imputed entity, one is also not able to apprehend or present the lack of this entity, which is emptiness. The reason is that if one does not rely on the conventional term [or notion of] space, one is not able to present space as [referring to] the lack of any entities."" Therefore, since sentient beings cling to the reality of delusive entities that are mere appearances, they plunge into cyclic existence. If one understands that these very [appearances] are unreal and illusionlike, this [understanding] surely serves as the remedy for the [clinging to reality]. However, emptiness-which is this imputation in the sense of the lack of such delusive [appearances] that appear as entities-is clearly delusive too. In the same way as an illusory lion kills an illusory elephant, this is [nothing more than] engaging in the [particular] reification of understanding emptiness as the remedy for the reification that conceives of real [entities]. Thus, when one's son dies in a dream, The conception "He does not exist" Removes the thought that he does exist, But it is also delusive. [140] This verse teaches that the [cultivation of emptiness] is the remedy for reification. Thus, if one experiences in a dream that one's son has been born and then dies, inasmuch as this is a dream, there is definitely no difference between the [son]'s birth and his death. Still, due to one's seeing [in the dream] that he has been born, there arises the mental state that conceives, "My son exists." When there is the appearance that he has died, there emerges the conception "My son has died and now he does not exist," [904] which removes the thought that fancies, "My son does exist." However, since both-the existence and the nonexistence of this son too-are equal in being a dream, they are alike in being delusive.

Everything economic science posits as given, that is, the range of dispositions of the economic agent which ground the illusion of the ahistorical universality of the categories and concepts employed by that science, is, in fact, the paradoxical product of a long collective history, endlessly reproduced in individual histories, which can be fully accounted for only by historical analysis: it is because history has inscribed these concomitantly in social and cognitive structures, practical patterns of thinking, perception and action, that it has conferred the appearance of natural, universal self-evidence on the institutions economics claims to theorize ahistorically; it has done this by, among other things, the amnesia of genesis that is encouraged, in this field as in others, by the immediate accord between the ‘subjective’ and the ‘objective’, between dispositions and positions, between anticipations (or hopes) and opportunities. Against the ahistorical vision of economics, we must, then, reconstitute, on the one hand, the genesis of the economic dispositions of economic agents and, especially, of their tastes, needs, propensities or aptitudes (for calculation, saving or work itself) and, on the other, the genesis of the economic field itself, that is to say, we must trace the history of the process of differentiation and autonomization which leads to the constitution of this specific game: the economic field as a cosmos obeying its own laws and thereby conferring a (limited) validity on the radical autonomization which pure theory effects by constituting the economic sphere as a separate world. It was only very gradually that the sphere of commodity exchange separated itself out from the other fields of existence and its specific nomos asserted itself – the nomos expressed in the tautology ‘business is business’; that economic transactions ceased to be conceived on the model of domestic exchanges, and hence as governed by social or family obligations (‘there’s no sentiment in business’); and that the calculation of individual gain, and hence economic interest, won out as the dominant, if not indeed exclusive, principle of business against the collectively imposed and controlled repression of calculating inclinations associated with the domestic economy. The

When everything has become the center, there is no longer any valid center; when everything is transmitting, the allegedly central transmitter is lost in the tangle of messages.

Should we amend all of the textbooks in America to explain to schoolchildren that what has been taught for more than two centuries about checks and balances is no longer valid? Should we teach them instead that the United States Congress and the courts are merely advisory groups that make suggestions to the president on what the law should be, but that the president is all-powerful and now has the final say on everything? Should we teach them that we are a government of men, not laws? Should we teach them that we used to be a democracy but now we only pretend to be?

TRUTH -“Truth is unbelievable- it cannot be believed it must factual and be known. To believe is to accept without proof, but to know is to have proven knowledge and that is the truth.” -“Not everyone is equipped to handle the truth. Of what benefit it is to tell someone the truth, if he/she is not ready to accept it…. only causes pain.” -“Truth is a two edged sword. If you are matured or can handle it, truth is liberating. However if you are not matured or is not ready to handle it, Truth can be a source of hurt and pain.” - Sekou Obadias – Author of “SOGANUTU” – A book of life’s Maxims -“Having a conversation with someone who is not ready for the truth, serves only to encourage him or her to be defensive”. Malcolm-Jamal Warner -“The scripture declares that it is unwise to have a conversation with a fool. It also say; “Try all spirits…..“ -“No one person has knowledge or knows the truth about everything. Truth is relative to most, for some, their truth is relevant for them to have others believe, in order to gain control.” -“The clearest path I have found to the truth is: to have an open mind to all people and on all subjects. to develop a thirst for knowledge. to be willing to go wherever the truth leads or calls.” -“In pursuit of the truth, many will encounter difficulties finding it. Simply because: People often use their obligations as excuses or obstacles which prevents them from going where truth leads them. 2) People usually feel the need to be validated by others -what others may think or say.” - Sekou Obadias – Author of “SOGANUTU” – A book of life’s Maxims WISDOM -“If you embrace the principle that man and his environment are one, and need each other, you will find the need to protect the environment and seek peace.” -“Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.’’ Proverbs 4:7 -“As you seek wisdom and understanding (attain to wise counsel; place your trust in God and the higher powers that guides you; do not be wise in your own eyes) you will find peace with both God and man.” - Sekou Obadias – Author of “SOGANUTU” – A book of life’s Maxims

There's no magic to the phrase radical Islam. It's a political talking point. It's not a strategy. And the reason I am careful about how I describe this threat has nothing to do with political correctness and everything to do with actually defeating extremism. Groups like ISIL and al-Qaeda want to make this war a war between Islam and America or between Islam and the west. They want to claim that they are the true leaders of over a billion Muslims around the world who reject their crazy notions. They want us to validate them by implying that they speak for those billion plus people. That they speak for Islam. That's their propaganda. That's how they recruit. And if we fall into the trap of painting all Muslims with a broad brush and imply that we are at war with an entire religion, then we are doing the terrorist's work for them.

Since the catastrophic defeat of the 1970’s, the moral question of radicality has gradually replaced the strategic question of revolution. That is, revolution has suffered the same fate as everything else in those decades: it has been privatized. It has become an opportunity for personal validation, with radicality as the standard of evaluation.“Revolutionary” acts are no longer appraised in terms of the situation in which they are embedded, the possibilities they open up or close.

The P.I. states that if something x has happened in certain particular circumstances n times in the past, we are justified in believing that the same circumstances will produce x on the (n + 1)th occasion. The P.I. is wholly respectable and authoritative, and it seems like a well-lit exit out of the whole problem. Until, that is, it happens to strike you (as can occur only in very abstract moods or when there’s an unusual amount of time before the alarm goes off) that the P.I. is itself merely an abstraction from experience … and so now what exactly is it that justifies our confidence in the P.I.? This latest thought may or may not be accompanied by a concrete memory of several weeks spent on a relative’s farm in childhood (long story). There were four chickens in a wire coop off the garage, the brightest of whom was called Mr. Chicken. Every morning, the farm’s hired man’s appearance in the coop area with a certain burlap sack caused Mr. Chicken to get excited and start doing warmup-pecks at the ground, because he knew it was feeding time. It was always around the same time t every morning, and Mr. Chicken had figured out that t(man + sack) = food, and thus was confidently doing his warmup-pecks on that last Sunday morning when the hired man suddenly reached out and grabbed Mr. Chicken and in one smooth motion wrung his neck and put him in the burlap sack and bore him off to the kitchen. Memories like this tend to remain quite vivid, if you have any. But with the thrust, lying here, being that Mr. Chicken appears now actually to have been correct—according to the Principle of Induction—in expecting nothing but breakfast from that (n + 1)th appearance of man + sack at t. Something about the fact that Mr. Chicken not only didn’t suspect a thing but appears to have been wholly justified in not suspecting a thing—this seems concretely creepy and upsetting. Finding some higher-level justification for your confidence in the P.I. seems much more urgent when you realize that, without this justification, our own situation is basically indistinguishable from that of Mr. Chicken. But the conclusion, abstract as it is, seems inescapable: what justifies our confidence in the Principle of Induction is that it has always worked so well in the past, at least up to now. Meaning that our only real justification for the Principle of Induction is the Principle of Induction, which seems shaky and question-begging in the extreme. The only way out of the potentially bedridden-for-life paralysis of this last conclusion is to pursue further abstract side-inquiries into what exactly ‘justification’ means and whether it’s true that the only valid justifications for certain beliefs and principles are rational and noncircular. For instance, we know that in a certain number of cases every year cars suddenly veer across the centerline into oncoming traffic and crash head-on into people who were driving along not expecting to get killed; and thus we also know, on some level, that whatever confidence lets us drive on two-way roads is not 100% rationally justified by the laws of statistical probability. And yet ‘rational justification’ might not apply here. It might be more the fact that, if you cannot believe your car won’t suddenly get crashed into out of nowhere, you just can’t drive, and thus that your need/desire to be able to drive functions as a kind of ‘justification’ of your confidence.* It would be better not to then start analyzing the various putative ‘justifications’ for your need/desire to be able to drive a car—at some point you realize that the process of abstract justification can, at least in principle, go on forever. The ability to halt a line of abstract thinking once you see it has no end is part of what usually distinguishes sane, functional people—people who when the alarm finally goes off can hit the floor without trepidation and plunge into the concrete business of the real workaday world—from the unhinged.

Almost every social significant category has been intentionally complicated and problematized by postmodern Theorists in order to deny such categories any objective validity and disrupt the systems of power that might exist across them.

For example, in the example with Terry and Chester, a person who was just beginning to meet the two could come up with the conclusion based on those two axioms, which a friend revealed to him/her. The person might try to come up with a solution to Terry’s hatred of Chester’s voice, and decide to teach the two characters American Sign Language, so Chester wouldn’t have to speak, but the person might later on discover that Terry seems to be functioning normally when Chester talks during casual, everyday conversations. It’s not that the person’s logic was incorrect; the conclusion was logically valid and logically followed the two axioms. It’s just that the axioms were accepted and assumed to be true. In reality, when the friend of Terry and Chester was referring to Chester’s “voice,” the friend was talking about Chester’s singing voice, not Chester’s actual voice, and the phrase “Terry hates everything Chester likes” could have been used hyperbolically, meaning that Terry does not literally hate everything Chester likes. The person came up with a logical conclusion, but the axioms were just immediately accepted as true; the person was not evaluating or verifying the information, nor was the person analyzing the multiple meanings behind the axioms. With critical thinking, however, there are a few stages that are required before making a conclusion: there is remember and understand, so to understand information, a person would need to see if the information makes sense or is plausible. For example, if a person was learning about the properties of matter, he/she should be able to understand that it makes sense for liquid to have faster moving molecules than solid matter, because it does not have a definite shape unless it is put into some container, or he/she might try to scroll through multiple sources of information to fill any gaps in understanding and confirm information. Unlike logic, which immediately accepts axioms as true to create a conclusion, a person must look at information with a critical eye in order to truly understand it in critical thinking. In addition, I think there is more skill and effectiveness behind deeply thinking about information (critical thinking) than trying to discover information (logic.) When it comes to thinking about the information (critical thinking), a person would have to understand the information’s real-world application (apply), the components of the information (analyze), the significance of the information (evaluate), and what can be made out with that information (synthesize.) Logic is an objective approach to trying to discover valid information, and it is highly important, but there is that lack of deep thinking when it comes to logic alone. A person would need critical thinking to verify the axioms and see the significance of the conclusion. Logic itself cannot view the significance of the conclusion Terry hates Chester’s voice, because it is meant to discover information based on axioms, not evaluate and make something out of information. With this, I do find that critical thinking is more important and has a higher range of skill than logic.

Without You Everything Is Hideous How are you? , sweetheart, here I am writing these letters and your thought does not leave me and here you are still the closest to me since that day, which did not end until now. I scatter my letters in front of your beautiful eyes to tell you that I am wrong and guilty ; Although I have not forgotten you for a moment, even while I am trying to convince myself that everything is finished from your point of view, but I make up for it and say well, this is enough for me to try to snatch her icy heart again, this heart that loved me with all sincerity that innocent childish heart that never hated One even over the one who is because of him has left me for a long time due to false suspicion I remember all your letters, so I read them from time to time How nice it was to call me a childish nickname - capturing like your cheeks a happy nickname. You didn’t know all my reasons, sweetie I indirectly told you about the biggest reason when I told you to read “So Forgive Me ”You are the most beautiful thing that has happened to me since I knew you. My beauty, today I want to tell you that you forgot something one day. You asked me: Have you loved before? So I told you : Yes I did it was a long time ago when I was a teenager; I never thought that I would love again after I was wounded by that deep wound, when I was left alone, the wolves of loneliness and separation scattered me, and no one comes to me to pull me from the bottom of the debris that happened in my heart, And to be honest, I was not afraid for myself as much as I feared for your tender heart; I don’t ever want to be the lover who leaves his lover, especially if it is you. My beautiful woman, I wanted to make sure that my heart never beats for anyone but you It’s not easy, believe me I admire you since we became close, since we started speaking in the innocent language of children, since you used to say to me you are late to respond, even if I was late for a few seconds since night became for us a second day we talk about it until dawn and more Since you were quarreling with others trying to make them understand my point of view. How delicious days were when you looked at me from a distance and smiled, and when I heard your laughter as much as I was jealous, my heart beat with joy All your conditions were beautiful even when you quarreled with me I am not here trying to tell you that I am innocent, I am not I hurt you many times but I swear it was not with intent They were rather fleeting and spontaneous things. I admit that I have hurt your pride and here I am now bearing the consequences of this matter, and I swear it is not an easy thing. But, my flower, when you told me that excuse to stay away from me for three months, it smashed me, how can someone take my moon from me? The one that shone my eyes and melted the ice around my heart after my heart became so attached to her that I became so addicted to her that when I talk to any girl I call her by your name. My little girl I lost my love previously, and I do not want to lose you, because I know that you are a twin of my soul, even if you deny this now, but in the depths of your heart you know the validity of this matter. I apologize for every moment that made you think with pain I just wanted to protect you from fleeting feelings or just those feelings that were attracted to you And I know you crave someone to love you just because you are beautiful I wanted to protect you from the feelings of a teenager And if it was a year or less late to reveal it You know that valuable things no matter how late they are, their value will be better, finer, sincere and thinner, and you deserve strong, sincere feelings that stem from the depths of the heart and from the depths of the soul feelings befitting you I see in you all the beauties in life And without you, everything is Hideous You have all my feelings, beautiful cheeks.

Christian situation ethics has only one norm or principle or law...that is binding and unexceptionable, always good and right regardless of the circumstances. That is 'love' -- the agape of the summary commandment to love God and neighbor. Everything else without exception, all laws and rules and principles and ideals and norms, are only contingent, only valid if they happen to serve love in any situation.

Ek-sistence can be said only of the essence of the human being, that is, only of the human way "to be." For as far as our experience shows, only the human being is admitted to the destiny of ek-sistence. Therefore ek-sistence can also never be thought of as a specific kind of living creature among others - granted that the human being is destined to think the essence of his being and not merely to give accounts of the nature and history of his constitution and activities. Thus even what we attribute to the human being as aniditar on the basis of the comparison with "beastsn is itself grounded in the essence of ek-sistence. The human body is something essentially 11561 other than an animal organism. Nor is the error of biologism overcome by adjoining a soul to the human body, a mind to the soul. and the existentiell to the mind, and then louder than before singing the praises of the mind - only to let everything relapse into "life-experience," with a warning that thinking by its inflexible concepts disrupts the flow of life and that thought of being distorts existence. The fact that physiology and physiological chemistry can scientifically investigate the human being as an organism is no proof that in this "organicn thing, that is, in the body scientifically explained, the essence of the human being consists. That has as little validity as the notion that the essence of nature has been discovered in atomic energy. It could even be that nature, in the face it turns toward the human being's technical mastery, is simply concealing in essence. Just as little as the essence of the human being consists in being an animal organism can this insufficient definition of the essence of the human being be overcome or offset by outfimng the human being with an immortal soul, the power of reason, or the character of a person. In each instance its essence is passed over, and passed over on the basis of the same metaphysical projection.

(the value of your work, ideas or self is not dictated by anyone but you. no one has the power to take away or add on to the value of everything you are or the value of anything you put into the world. you don't need anyone's approval but your own) validation is poison. your magic doesn't need anyone's approval to be potent.

According to many experts the majority of the people won't be needed anymore for the coming society. Almost everything will be done by artificial intelligence, including self-driving cars and trucks, which already exist anyway. Some even mentioned that AI is making universities obsolete by how fast it can produce information. However, In my view, the AI has limitations that the many can't see, because on a brain to brain comparison, the AI always wins, yet the AI can only compute with programmable data. In other words, the AI can think like a human but can't imagine or create a future. The AI is always codependent on the imagination of its user. So the limitations of the AI are in fact determined by humans. It is not bad that we have AI but that people have no idea of how to use it apart from replacing their mental faculties and being lazy. This is actually why education has always been a scam. The AI will simply remove that from the way. But knowledge will still require analysis and input of information, so the AI doesn't really replace the necessary individuals of the academic world, but merely the many useless ones that keep copying and plagiarizing old ideas to justify and validate a worth they don't truly possess. Being afraid and paranoid about these transitions doesn't make sense because evolution can't be stopped, only delayed. The problem at the moment has more to do with those who want to keep themselves in power by force and profiting from the transitions. The level of consciousness of humanity is too low for what is happening, which is why people are easily deceived. Consequently, there will be more anger, fear, and frustration, because for the mind that is fixed on itself, change is perceived as chaos. The suffering is then caused by emotional attachments, stubbornness and the paranoid fixation on using outdated systems and not knowing how to adapt properly. In essence, AI is a problem for the selfish mind - rooted in cognitive rationalizations -, but an opportunity of great value for the self-reflective mind - capable of a metacognitive analysis. And the reason why nobody seems to understand this is precisely because, until now, everyone separated the mind from the spirit, while not knowing how a spiritual ascension actually goes through the mind. And this realization, obviously, will turn all religions obsolete too. Some have already come to this conclusion, and they are the ones who are ready.

We must regain and reclaim our self-value. The first step towards colonizing any mind, soul, or body is to devalue them. To make them feel that they are unable or unqualified to make any meaningful contributions. Coloniality puts colonized people in such a position that they must validate everything they do through the criteria and measurements of the apparatus put in place by Europe and North America. This has been the case for centuries. As such, nothing can be done without reclaiming our value, and reconnecting with that deeply buried voice of knowledge inside of us that has been silenced by the wreckage of wars, sanctions, racism, violence, sexism, and other forms of divisions, classifications manufactured and imposed by coloniality.

Everything I read, listened to, and learned, validated my right to existence as a Black man in America but only within the confines of a patriarchal definition of masculine identity. What went unquestioned were the ways my newfound sense of Black manhood contributed to the ongoing marginalization of my mother, her twin sister, my grandmother, my high school guidance counselor, and more than half of the student population on Hampton University’s campus. I began to see myself, but only by refusing to see black women. The centrality of the Black male experience and the discourse of racist oppression has been passed down from generation to generation through our politics and culture.

Centuries ago, if you had wanted to build a large structure such as a bridge or a cathedral you would have engaged a master builder. He would have had some knowledge of what it takes to give a structure strength and stability with the least possible expense and effort. He would not have been able to express much of this knowledge in the language of mathematics and physics, as we can today. Instead, he relied mainly on a complex collection of intuitions, habits and rules of thumb, which he had learned from his apprentice-master and then perhaps amended through guesswork and long experience. Even so, these intuitions, habits and rules of thumb were in effect theories, explicit and inexplicit, and they contained real knowledge of the subjects we nowadays call engineering and architecture. It was for the knowledge in those theories that you would have hired him, pitifully inaccurate though it was compared with what we have today, and of very narrow applicability. When admiring centuries-old structures, people often forget that we see only the surviving ones. The overwhelming majority of structures built in medieval and earlier times have collapsed long ago, often soon after they were built. That was especially so for innovative structures. It was taken for granted that innovation risked catastrophe, and builders seldom deviated much from designs and techniques that had been validated by long tradition. Nowadays, in contrast, it is quite rare for any structure – even one that is unlike anything that has ever been built before – to fail because of faulty design. Anything that an ancient master builder could have built, his modern colleagues can build better and with far less human effort. They can also build structures which he could hardly have dreamt of, such as skyscrapers and space stations. They can use materials which he had never heard of, such as fibreglass or reinforced concrete, and which he could hardly have used even if he could somehow have been given them, for he had only a scanty and inaccurate understanding of how materials work. Progress to our current state of knowledge was not achieved by accumulating more theories of the same kind as the master builder knew.

Mon général,” Mathieu said quietly, “ever since Greek mythology, Prometheus, Sisyphus, and then Faust, and all the rest— not forgetting, of course, The Sorcerer’s Apprentice and other fables— everything, including Oedipus and atom, everything, has always begun as a poetic license, as a . . . metaphor and then invariably it became a hard, down-to-earth reality. The whole purpose of science, indeed, seems to be a validation of metaphors. Sodom and Gomorrah, materialistic West and materialistic East, all the parables and fables . . . as if all the metaphors were pointing to some historical and scientific truth. Mankind told itself everything about itself almost from the start, but it never believed it. If it comes to perish one day, it will be through sheer disbelief . . .

Almost every socially significant category has been intentionally complicated and problematized by postmodern Theorists in order to deny such categories any objective validity and disrupt the systems of power that might exist across them.

Proudhon (Weitling too) thinks he is telling the worst about property when he calls it theft (v00. Passing quite over the embarrassing ques­ tion, what well-founded objection could be made against theft, we only ask: Is the concept 'theft' at all possible unless one allows validity to the concept 'property'? How can one steal ifproperty is not already extant? 'Vhat belongs to no one cannot be stolen; the water that one draws out of the sea he does not steal. Accordingly property is not theft, but a theft becomes possible only through property. Weitling has to come to this too, as he does regard everything as the property ofall: if something is 'the property of all', then indeed the individual who appropriates it to himself steals.

No believer, no matter how sincere, could possibly write the Divine Comedy today, even if he possessed a talent equal to Dante’s. Visions and symbols do not have the immediate and overwhelming reality for us that they had for the medieval poet. In the Divine Comedy the whole of nature is merely a canvas upon which the religious symbol and image are painted. Western man has spent more than five hundred years – half a millennium – in stripping nature of these projections and turning it into a realm of neutral objects which his science may control. Thus it could hardly be expected that the religious image would have the same force for us as it did for Dante. This is simply a psychic fact within human history; psychic facts have just as much historical validity as the facts that we now, unlike the man of Dante's time, travel in airplanes and work in factories regulated by computing machines. A great work of art can never be repeated – the history of art shows us time and again that literal imitation leads to pastiche – because it springs from the human soul, which evolves like everything else in nature. This point must be insisted upon, contrary to the view of some of our more enthusiastic medievalists who picture the psychic containment of medieval man as a situation of human completeness to which we must return. History has never allowed man to return to the past in any total sense. And our psychological problems cannot be solved by a regression to a past state in which they had not yet been brought into being.

No matter how convincing and irrefutable I felt my train of thoughts to be, as well as that otherwise ideas that has led us all to the conclusion that life is meaningless I still had some obscure doubts as to the validity of the final outcome of my deliberations. It was expressed as follows: I, that is my reason, have acknowledged that life is a rational. If there is nothing higher than reason (and there is not, and nothing can prove that there is), then reason is the creator of life for me. Without reason I can have no life. How then can reason to deny life when it is the creator of it? Or looking at it another way: if there were no life my reason would not exist, which must mean that reason is the offspring of life. Life is everything. Reason is the fruit of life and yet this reason rejects life itself. I felt that something was not quite right here. Life is a senseless evil, that is certain, I said to myself. Yet I have lived and still live, and so to humanity has lived and still lives. How can this be? Why do men live when it is possible not to live?

according to Dostoevsky, all is simultaneous, everything coexists. That which has meaning only as “earlier” or “later,” which is sufficient only unto its own moment, which is valid only as past, or as future, or as present in relation to past or future, is for him nonessential and is not incorporated into his world. That is why his characters remember nothing, they have no biography in the sense of something past and fully experienced. They remember from their own past only that which has not ceased to be present for them, that which is still experienced by them as the present: an unexpiated sin, a crime, an unforgiven insult.

5. You can’t prove a lot of things that it would be lunacy to deny—for instance, that human reason is trustworthy, that it is not being hypnotized by a demon at every moment. Of course that thought is ridiculous, but can you prove it isn’t true? No, because you’d have to use your reason to prove it, and that means trusting the validity of reason, and that is assuming the very thing you’re supposed to be proving, “begging the question”. If a thousand prisoners are all on trial, no one of them has the right to be the judge and declare all one thousand innocent. If all acts of reasoning are on trial and need to be justified, no one of them has the right to do that justifying. So you can’t prove the validity of reasoning. So not everything has to be proved, for not everything can be proved. So the demand to prove the existence of spirit, and the refusal to believe it just because it isn’t proved, is an unfair demand.

The refrain repeated through this books is that everything we need, we already possess in Christ. This means that the what-if has been taken out of the equation. We can take absurd risks, push harder, go further, and leave it all on the field without fear--and have fun doing so. We can give with reckless abandon, because we no longer need to ensure a return of success, love, meaning, validation, and approval. We can invest freely and forcefully, because we've been freely and forcefully invested in. (188)

Surkov himself is the ultimate expression of this psychology. As I watch him give his speech to the students and journalists, he seems to change and transform like mercury, from cherubic smile to demonic stare, from a woolly liberal preaching "modernization" to a finger-wagging nationalist, spitting out willfully contradictory ideas: "managed democracy," "conservative modernization." Then he steps back, smiling, and says: "We need a new political party, and we should help it happen, no need to wait and make it form by itself." And when you look closely at the party men in the political reality show Surkov directs, the spitting nationalists and beetroot-faced communists, you notice how they all seem to perform their roles with a little ironic twinkle. Elsewhere Surkov likes to invoke the new postmodern texts just translated into Russian, the breakdown of grand narratives, the impossibility of truth, how everything is only "simulacrum" and "simulacra" . . . and then in the next moment he says how he despises relativism and loves conservatism, before quoting Allen Ginsberg's "Sunflower Sutra," in English and by heart. If the West once undermined and helped to ultimately defeat the USSR by uniting free market economics, cool culture, and democratic politics into one package (parliaments, investment banks, and abstract expressionism fused to defeat the Politburo, planned economics, and social realism), Surkov's genius has been to tear those associations apart, to marry authoritarianism and modern art, to use the language of rights and representations to validate tranny, to recut and paste democratic capitalism until it means the reverse of its original purpose.

For that holy and prudent man knew that to admit the notion of piety is nothing other than that everything is received by faith from the fathers and consigned by the same faith to the sons and [piety is] not our religion, which we want, that leads but more that which leads must be followed, for it is proper to Christian modesty and gravity not to pass on his own beliefs to those who come after him, but to preserve what has been received from his ancestors.

Spirituality means many things to many people,” Klara said. “It’s a firm conviction that there is a God. In the New Thought movement, there are people who insist on finding euphemisms for God. Cosmic consciousness, universal intelligence, higher power, all these are just other words to be employed by those who are afraid to call it God. “God is a perfectly valid English word that embodies everything of which these people speak. Religion adulterates the term. It turns that word into the image of a white-haired, long-bearded sage sitting on a throne in the clouds, which is absurd. God can have no face. Does He have a penis and testicles as well? What need has He for those? Even the one time He is said to have fathered a child, He didn’t do so in the conventional way. At least Greek and Roman mythologies have gods who enjoy their genitalia.

How to stay positive in your life? Learn positivity You can characterize positive speculation as positive symbolism, positive self-talk, or general good faith, however, these are on the whole despite everything general, vague ideas.They are clear about objectives and they are certain that they will achieve them, at some point or another. Second, confident people search for the positive qualities in each issue or trouble. At the point when things turn out badly, as they frequently do, they state, "That is acceptable!" And then set about discovering something positive about the circumstance. At the point when we attempt to transform ourselves to improve things; we quite often center around our practices. We believe that in the event that we change what we are doing and pick a progressively positive conduct, we will see better outcomes. Fundamentally, this is valid however it truly streamlines the issue. Over and over again, we overlook our considerations and convictions about the things that we need to change when our musings massively affect how we act. Thinking emphatically is basic to effective living. For instance, on the off chance that you need to be increasingly emphatic and go to bat for your privileges, you should initially accept that you have those rights; that you are qualified for shield those rights and that you can impart your privileges in a powerful way. On the off chance that you do not have any of those musings or convictions, you are going to battle to be self-assured. On the off chance that you need trust in any everyday issue, you are going battle to make an accomplishment of that part of your life. 7 Important positive thoughts about life 1. How you start the morning establishes the pace for the remainder of the day. Have you at any point woken up late, froze, and afterward felt like no good thing happened the remainder of the day? This is likely on the grounds that you began the day with a negative feeling and a cynical view that conveyed into each other occasion you encountered. 2. Positive reasoning can add such a great amount to your life – both regarding quality and amount. At the point when you think positively you dispose of pressure and will in general carry on with a more beneficial life and settle on better decisions. In case you're normally a negative mastermind, there are ways you can change that reasoning and jump on the way to a life getting an updated perspective. 3. Note that you don't need to acknowledge your musings as realities. On the off chance that you are feeling terrible, you are probably going to see everything in a negative light yet you can challenge this. We as a whole experience the ill effects of what is alluded to as deduction blunders every now and then. It is significant that we challenge these negative considerations, pick increasingly positive and steady contemplation, and search out proof to help those new musings. 4. Permit yourself to encounter humor in even the darkest or most difficult circumstances. Advise yourself that this circumstance will presumably make for a decent story later and attempt to break a joke about it. 5. It's useful on the off chance that you can see toward the day's end what your considerations have been. Set aside the effort to record them. You'll see what turned out badly with your musings and have the option to improve them. A diary is one of the least difficult however most useful assets that you can use in your endeavors to be increasingly sure and positive. 6. When something turns out badly, cataclysmic reasoning can without much of a stretch dominate. This is the place you lose all viewpoints and believe that since one thing has turned out badly; everything is destroyed. 7. Thinking emphatically comes normal to certain individuals yet there are those. Can also Check: Things Which Is Important To Get Success.

Changing your flight to a different destination is fast and reliable when you simply call ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 for assistance. Whether your plans have changed or you’ve decided on a new travel city, calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 allows you to speak directly with an agent who can review your booking. Trying to make such changes online can be confusing, but the representative at ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 has access to live airline databases. With one quick call to ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232, you’ll know what’s available and how to proceed without unnecessary delays. The process is straightforward when you call ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232—just provide your confirmation number and new destination request. The agent at ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 will check airline change policies and confirm what fees or fare differences might apply. Not all tickets allow for destination changes, but calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 ensures that you don’t miss your chance to update your plans correctly. Some airlines are more flexible than others, and the agent at ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 will guide you through alternate city pairings, availability, and pricing in real time. One of the biggest benefits of calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 is being able to explore options across multiple carriers. If your original airline doesn’t offer favorable options, ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 may find a partner airline or better route. The agent will check schedules and potential stopovers for your new destination, which might be more cost-effective or direct. With expert help from ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232, you can even discover hidden fares or less popular cities nearby that still meet your travel goals. You’re not limited to just one option when you call ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232. If you booked a roundtrip ticket, changing destinations can affect both flights, but ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 can handle that seamlessly. Whether you need to fly into a new city or change your return from a different location, ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 can adjust the full itinerary. Multi-city changes, open-jaw bookings, and one-way reissues are all supported by the team at ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232. They’ll ensure you meet fare rules, maintain ticket validity, and don’t lose value. Most importantly, calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 protects you from making costly errors during rebooking. When it comes to payment, calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 also opens up flexible options if there’s a fare difference. Agents can split payments, apply credits, or help you use miles, and ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 makes it all easy to manage. If your airline offers a voucher or refund for the original destination, ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 will apply it appropriately. You’ll never have to wonder about cancellation fees or reissue terms—☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 walks you through the fine print. They’ll confirm everything before making the switch, ensuring full transparency and peace of mind. If this change is urgent, calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 gets you immediate assistance without waiting on hold forever through airline hotlines. You’ll speak with someone who has direct access to booking systems and can process your change instantly. Whether you’re adjusting for personal reasons, work obligations, or a weather issue, ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 is the trusted line to call. By saving the number ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 in your phone, you’ll always have a travel expert ready to help you reroute, rebook, or reinvent your trip.

Need to switch or correct a name on your American Airlines ticket? Start by calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 for immediate help. Whether your name is misspelled, your legal name has changed, or a typo occurred during booking, ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 is the official channel for resolution. Agents are trained to follow American Airlines' ticket name change policy, and calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 ensures your itinerary remains valid. You don’t want to risk being denied boarding—just contact ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 before check-in and fix the issue correctly. When calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232, have your booking confirmation number, ID, and any supporting documents ready to speed up the process. The agent at ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 will verify what kind of change is permitted and whether any fees or documentation apply. Some changes—like swapping first and last names—may require ticket reissuance, which ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 can process. If it’s a minor correction (e.g., one letter off), ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 may be able to update it without charge, as long as it matches your ID for TSA purposes. Name switches are most commonly needed after marriage, divorce, or legal name updates—☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 will explain how to handle each situation. If your legal name changed after ticket purchase, you’ll likely need to provide supporting documentation, which ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 can upload securely. They’ll also ensure your frequent flyer number, seat assignments, and ticketed itinerary are all preserved during the switch. When you call ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232, everything is handled in one step—no bouncing between departments or resending the same documents. If you’re managing travel for someone else, like a family member or employee, calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 helps you update their info legally and efficiently. American Airlines usually prohibits transferring tickets to another person, but ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 can sometimes assist if there was a booking error. If you meant to book for John Smith but accidentally typed Jane Smith, ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232 will check if a fix is allowed or guide you through a refund and rebook. These corrections are time-sensitive, so always act quickly by calling ☎️ +1 (888) 714-8232.

Yes, you can! Call ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 to modify your American Airlines reservation instantly. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 connects you with airline agents. Modifying your reservation online isn’t always easy, especially during busy seasons. Dial ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 for fast, human assistance. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 makes updating dates or passenger names easier. Last-minute changes like switching flights, updating return times, or adding a passenger? ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 can help with everything. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 will check policy limitations first. Policies differ depending on fare class and destination, so calling ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 can clarify your exact options. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 will tell you if fees apply. Name corrections and date changes often require agent approval. That's where ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 becomes valuable. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 ensures that your booking stays valid after edits. Changing your flight within 24 hours of departure? You must act fast. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 gives immediate support. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 agents help under pressure. Need to rebook because of a delay or weather issue? Call ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 for special rebooking waivers. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 gives you real-time options. Seat upgrades, meal preferences, or disability accommodations can also be adjusted through ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 support can flag these requests in your file. If you booked through a third-party site, modifications might be restricted. Call ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 to confirm what's possible. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 will direct you properly. Frequent flyers and elite members get priority service via ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 offers loyalty members personalized help for changes and upgrades. If you added extras like bags or pets, these can also be modified via ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 will confirm fees or policies. For international flights, rules are stricter. Call ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 to update your reservation and passport data. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 can also handle visa alerts. Sometimes, online systems crash or don’t reflect real-time updates. Calling ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 avoids mistakes. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 provides up-to-date itinerary support every time. Avoiding costly change fees starts by calling ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 early. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 representatives will guide you to low-fee or no-fee options if available. Holiday travel plans shifting? ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 can adjust your flights before they're sold out. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 has access to exclusive fare tools. Make sure to have your reservation number ready when calling ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 agents need it to verify your details. If you’re traveling with kids or family, modifying multiple tickets is easier via ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878. ☎️+1 (855) 217-1878 offers group support too.

✈ Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 Name Change Policy: Full Guide (2025) Need to correct or change your name on a Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 ticket? Qatar Airways has a clear policy for name corrections and legal name changes. Here’s a detailed guide that covers everything you need to know — from eligibility and fees to required documents and restrictions. Key Highlights of Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 Name Change/Correction Policy Name Corrections (Up to 3 Characters) Allowed Corrections: + (855)-564-8048 Typographical or spelling errors Changing the sequence of first and last name Adding or removing a middle name Expanding shortened names Replacing nickname with legal name Limitations: + (855)-564-8048 Corrections allowed up to 3 characters total (including spaces and punctuation). Valid only for Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 marketed and operated flights (not valid for codeshare/interline partners). Correction Process: Can be done through travel agents or the Qatar Airways + (855)-564-8048 Trade Portal. Legal Name Changes When It's Allowed: Due to marriage, divorce, adoption, or legal court orders.

✈ Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 Name Change Policy: Full Guide (2025) Need to correct or change your name on a Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 ticket? Qatar Airways has a clear policy for name corrections and legal name changes. Here’s a detailed guide that covers everything you need to know — from eligibility and fees to required documents and restrictions. Key Highlights of Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 Name Change/Correction Policy Name Corrections (Up to 3 Characters) Allowed Corrections: + (855)-564-8048 Typographical or spelling errors Changing the sequence of first and last name Adding or removing a middle name Expanding shortened names Replacing nickname with legal name Limitations: + (855)-564-8048 Corrections allowed up to 3 characters total (including spaces and punctuation). Valid only for Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 marketed and operated flights (not valid for codeshare/interline partners). Correction Process: Can be done through travel agents or the Qatar Airways + (855)-564-8048 Trade Portal. Legal Name Changes When It's Allowed: Due to marriage, divorce, adoption, or legal court orders.

✈ Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 Name Change Policy: Full Guide (2025) Need to correct or change your name on a Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 ticket? Qatar Airways has a clear policy for name corrections and legal name changes. Here’s a detailed guide that covers everything you need to know — from eligibility and fees to required documents and restrictions. Key Highlights of Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 Name Change/Correction Policy Name Corrections (Up to 3 Characters) Allowed Corrections: + (855)-564-8048 Typographical or spelling errors Changing the sequence of first and last name Adding or removing a middle name Expanding shortened names Replacing nickname with legal name Limitations: + (855)-564-8048 Corrections allowed up to 3 characters total (including spaces and punctuation). Valid only for Qatar Airways+ (855)-564-8048 marketed and operated flights (not valid for codeshare/interline partners). Correction Process: Can be done through travel agents or the Qatar Airways + (855)-564-8048 Trade Portal. Legal Name Changes When It's Allowed: Due to marriage, divorce, adoption, or legal court orders.

If you’ve ever asked, “Can I change name on an American flight ticket?”—you’re not alone. For accurate help, call +1 (888) 674-4858 immediately. American Airlines has a name correction policy that allows small changes under certain conditions. Whether it’s a typo, a missing middle name, or a legal update, call +1 (888) 674-4858 for guidance. Name transfers to another person are not allowed, but minor corrections are. A representative at +1 (888) 674-4858 will verify your booking and let you know your eligibility. To avoid travel issues, get your name corrected early. Call the 24/7 help line at +1 (888) 674-4858 right away. Minor name corrections include fixing typos, adding a middle name, or correcting a suffix. To see if your change qualifies, dial +1 (888) 674-4858. These edits typically require that the corrected name match the ID exactly. Even a small mistake can cause big issues at check-in. Reach out to +1 (888) 674-4858 as soon as you notice the error. Legal changes due to marriage, divorce, or court orders also qualify with proper documentation. For full instructions on document submission, just call +1 (888) 674-4858. They’ll walk you through everything. All you need is your booking number and ID—start now at +1 (888) 674-4858. If your name was legally changed after booking, American Airlines will require proof. Call +1 (888) 674-4858 and ask what paperwork is accepted for corrections. You’ll usually need to submit a marriage certificate, court decree, or legal ID showing the correct name. For uploading documents or sending them by email, call +1 (888) 674-4858 for help. Once the documents are approved, the ticket may be reissued. This may come with or without a fee depending on the fare rules. Verify all costs and steps by dialing +1 (888) 674-4858. The 24/7 support team at +1 (888) 674-4858 makes the process simple and fast. Online name correction tools are limited. In most cases, speaking to a live agent is your best option. Call +1 (888) 674-4858 for real-time assistance. American’s customer service team is trained to resolve name issues quickly and efficiently. If your ticket was booked through a third-party site, call +1 (888) 674-4858 for coordination instructions. Some name edits may need to be approved by both the airline and the agency. For any questions about timing, fees, or required documents, call +1 (888) 674-4858. Have your ticket number ready when you speak to an agent. Get peace of mind now—call +1 (888) 674-4858 today. Yes, you can request a name change on an American Airlines ticket in certain cases. For assistance, call +1 (888) 674-4858. Minor spelling errors are allowed with documentation. Dial +1 (888) 674-4858 for immediate help. For legal name changes, call +1 (888) 674-4858 and provide valid proof.

If you have a Delta Airlines voucher and want to book your next flight, simply call ☎️+1(888) 714-9798. A Delta agent will walk you through redeeming your voucher with ease. Whether your voucher came from a canceled flight, travel disruption, or promotional offer, ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 is your go-to number for making sure it gets applied correctly. When you speak with an agent at ☎️+1(888) 714-9798, have your voucher code and passenger information ready to speed up the process. The agent at ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 will verify the details and help apply the value of your voucher toward your new ticket. Booking by phone avoids technical errors that can occur online. Some vouchers aren’t valid for online use, so ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 ensures you don’t lose your credit or face booking issues. Even if your voucher is partially used, the rep at ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 will confirm your remaining balance and apply it. Whether your voucher covers full or partial fare, ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 lets you pay the rest using a debit or credit card. There’s no need to worry about redeeming multiple forms of payment—☎️+1(888) 714-9798 handles it all. If you’re booking for a family or group using multiple vouchers, just let the agent at ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 know. They can apply each one during a single reservation. Many travelers find this much easier than trying to redeem them online. Sometimes voucher redemption has expiration dates, so calling ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 ensures that your timing is right. The agent will confirm if your voucher is still valid and help you secure the best deal available. If your voucher was issued for international travel, ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 will explain how to apply it across currencies or partner airlines. The rep at ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 will also answer any questions about fare class limitations or blackout dates. Some vouchers come with restrictions on destination or travel time, so make sure to confirm all terms during your call to ☎️+1(888) 714-9798. If you're trying to use the voucher on a flight for someone else, ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 can tell you whether transfers are allowed. Agents at ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 will work to accommodate your needs, especially if the voucher is part of a goodwill credit. If you booked your original flight with SkyMiles and received a voucher instead, call ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 to determine how to rebook using both miles and voucher credit. The booking system at ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 is flexible and agent-supported. Agents can also help if your voucher code isn’t working or has technical issues. Calling ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 ensures the issue is resolved without delay. Unlike email support or online chat, calling ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 connects you directly to a real person who can troubleshoot. You can also make changes to your booking after redemption if needed. If plans change, call ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 to adjust your itinerary, and any remaining balance from the voucher can be rolled over or credited again. The agent at ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 will ensure your new travel plans are set properly. Want to book hotels or car rentals using your voucher value? ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 can advise whether your voucher applies to packages and bundle deals. This flexibility is best confirmed directly with ☎️+1(888) 714-9798. If you’ve received an eCredit instead of a traditional voucher, ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 can still redeem it for your chosen flight. Just give the code during the call. The live support at ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 also ensures that all taxes, fees, and changes are clearly explained so there are no surprises. Booking with a voucher doesn’t mean less support—in fact, calling ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 gives you more confidence. Your flight is secure, your credit is used, and everything is confirmed before you hang up. Call ☎️+1(888) 714-9798 today and use your voucher toward your next adventure.

Exploring Love in the Digital Age: A Review of Masseporno In today’s digital age, the concept of love is no longer confined to books and movies. Instead, it has found a prominent place in the online world, with various websites dedicated to exploring its multifaceted nature. One such site that stands out is masseporno.com, a platform dedicated to delving into the many dimensions of love—romantic, platonic, self-love, and everything in between. User Experience and Design The first thing that strikes you when you visit masseporno.com is its clean, modern design. The website uses soothing pastel colors, elegant fonts, and a minimalist layout that immediately sets a calming tone. Navigation is straightforward, with clearly defined sections on love advice, relationship tips, personal stories, and even psychological insights into the science of love. The homepage greets users with a welcoming message and a featured article, making it easy for visitors to dive right into topics that interest them. The website is fully responsive, meaning it works seamlessly across devices, whether you're browsing on a smartphone, tablet, or desktop. The pages load quickly, and the design remains consistent and user-friendly, making for a smooth browsing experience. Content Quality and Relevance Masseporno.com stands out for its rich and diverse content. Articles are well-researched, thoughtful, and often backed by expert opinions from relationship therapists, psychologists, and even sociologists. Whether you're looking for advice on how to maintain a long-distance relationship, seeking ways to boost your self-esteem, or exploring deeper philosophical questions about the nature of love, the site covers a broad spectrum of topics. One of the standout features of the site is its blog section, which features personal stories of love, heartbreak, growth, and healing. These stories are relatable and often serve as a source of comfort for individuals who may be experiencing similar emotions. Interactive Features and Community Engagement What really sets masseporno.com apart from other websites in the genre is its interactive features. Users can engage with the content through comments, polls, and forums where they can share their experiences and seek advice. This sense of community is invaluable for those seeking validation or connection, especially when navigating the complexities of love. Conclusion Overall, masseporno.com is a thoughtful and comprehensive resource for anyone looking to explore the many aspects of love. It's easy navigation, high-quality content, and interactive features make it a standout in its category. Whether you’re in a relationship, exploring self-love, or simply curious about love in all its forms, this website offers something valuable for everyone.

☎️+1(888)727-0199 Wondering if your child can fly solo on American Airlines? You're not alone. Parents today are juggling busy schedules, split families, and kids with exciting opportunities that might mean traveling without an adult. Whether it’s a school trip, a summer vacation with grandparents, or just flying home, knowing the airline's policies is key. That’s where we come in — to give you all the essential info in one spot ☎️+1(888)727-0199 so you can book with confidence and peace of mind ☎️+1(888)727-0199. What Is American Airlines’ Unaccompanied Minor Policy? ☎️+1(888)727-0199 American Airlines has a well-established unaccompanied minor (UM) policy to ensure your child travels safely. Kids aged 5–14 must use the service when flying alone on nonstop or connecting flights. It's not optional for them — it’s required ☎️+1(888)727-0199. For teens aged 15–17, it’s optional, but many parents still choose it for extra peace of mind ☎️+1(888)727-0199. The service includes gate-to-gate assistance, in-flight attention, and coordination with the receiving adult. It’s designed to take the stress off parents while keeping children secure throughout their journey. How Much Does the Unaccompanied Minor Service Cost? ☎️+1(888)727-0199 The cost is $150 each way (plus tax) for up to two children traveling together. That fee covers everything — from escort service through the airport to supervised layovers. If you have more than two kids, you’ll still only pay the same fee per group ☎️+1(888)727-0199. Not a bad deal when you consider the level of support they get on board and at the airport ☎️+1(888)727-0199. You can add the unaccompanied minor service when booking online, or call an agent to ensure everything is handled correctly. What Flights Are Eligible? ☎️+1(888)727-0199 Not all flights qualify. American Airlines allows unaccompanied minors only on nonstop or selected connecting flights. International travel is limited, so check in advance. Connecting flights through certain cities are also off-limits due to the complexity of the transfer process ☎️+1(888)727-0199. Red-eye flights (typically departing between 9 p.m. and 5 a.m.) are restricted unless there are no other options available ☎️+1(888)727-0199. Planning ahead will help you avoid unexpected changes. Always double-check the flight itinerary against American Airlines' official UM guidelines. What’s the Process Like on Travel Day? ☎️+1(888)727-0199 Parents or guardians must accompany the child to the departure gate and stay until the flight has taken off. The airline requires you to provide identification and contact details for both drop-off and pick-up parties ☎️+1(888)727-0199. The receiving adult must also show valid ID and sign off when the child is released at the destination ☎️+1(888)727-0199. What If There Are Delays or Cancellations? ☎️+1(888)727-0199 If something unexpected happens, American Airlines staff are trained to stay with your child at all times. In case of delays or layovers, they’ll be supervised in a designated area until the flight resumes or alternative arrangements are made ☎️+1(888)727-0199. You’ll also be contacted immediately, so be sure to keep your phone nearby and stay available for updates ☎️+1(888)727-0199. The airline makes sure your child is never left alone — no matter wh

Meadows also received a text on December 20, 2020, from Mike Lindell, a mustachioed, self-described former crack addict who’d made a fortune as CEO of the bedding company My Pillow. Lindell, who was an infomercial star, major Trump rally fixture, and financial backer of various protests against the former president’s loss, implored Meadows to have federal agents seize voting machines in key states. He was famous for wearing a large cross necklace and his message was an overheated blend of Christian prayer and internet insanity. “Hey Mark, I felt I was suppose to text you this message … You being a man a faith and on the front line of the decisions that are going to be historical! I would ask that you pray for wisdom and discernment from God! You are one of the people the president trusts the most. That being said I want to add my input.… Everything Sidney has said is true!” Lindell wrote. “We have to get the machines and everything we already have proves the President won by millions of votes! I have read and not validated yet that you and others talked him out of seizing them … If true . I pray it is part of a bigger plan … I am grateful that on the night of the election the algorithms of the corrupt machines broke and they realized our president would win in spite of the historical fraud! I look for deviations every day in my business … when I find one I investigate relentlessly until I know why it happened and how it happened … (this is my gift from God that has made my business so successful) From 11:15 pm on the night of the election I have spent all my time running impossible deviations and numbers from this election … I also was blessed to be able to get info and help Sidney Lin General Flynn and everyone else out there gathering all the massive evidence! I have been sickened by politicians (especially republicans) judges, the media not wanting to see truth (no matter what the truth would be!) This is the biggest cover up of one of the worst crimes in history! I have spent over a million$to help uncover this fraud and used my platform so people can get the word not to give up! The people on both sides have to see the truth and when they do.… There will not be no civil war, people (including politicians!) are fearing! The only thing any of us should fear is fear of the Lord! Every person on this planet needs to know the truth and see the evidence!!! Mark . God has his hand in all of this and has put you on the front line … I will continue praying for you to have great wisdom and discernment! Blessings Mike.” Meadows seemed grateful

Sera downs all the liquor and half the beer almost immediately. She pushes her glass forward to indicate that she’s ready for another. In lieu of working she has decided to drink a lot tonight. This is one of those rare times when everything seems to be getting to her. The normally undefined craving for companionship is making itself known to her and she doesn’t like it. She feels strange, older. The incident with the security guard has disturbed her more than she can admit to herself. She cannot accept that she needs to be, at least at some deeply hidden level, or even in some insignificant way, accepted, validated like a parking ticket, punched.

Westjet Airlines allows lap infants on short-haul flights. While lap infants travel free on domestic routes, international flights may incur taxes and fees. Ensure you add the infant to your booking in advance and provide proof of age at check-in. For more information, contact a travel expert at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Age Restrictions for Lap Infants Lap infants must be under two years old for the entire journey. If the infant turns two during the trip, a separate seat must be purchased for the return leg. Proof of age, such as a birth certificate or passport, may be required at check-in. For details, check the official website or call +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Lap Infants on Red-Eye Flights Westjet Airlines permits lap infants on red-eye flights. Ensure you understand the airline's infant policy by contacting them at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Add the infant to your booking in advance and comply with safety regulations. Bassinets may be available on specific long-haul red-eye routes, but reservations should be made early. Additional Resources Step-by-Step Guide to Adding an Infant to Westjet Airlines Economy: +1-855-546-5598 (OTA) Traveling with a Baby? How to Add an Infant to Westjet Airlines Economy Class Tips for Adding an Infant to Your Westjet Airlines Flight Everything You Need to Know About Bringing an Infant on Westjet Airlines Economy Can I Add an Infant to an Already Booked Westjet Flight? For any inquiries, feel free to call +1-855-546-5598 (OTA). How to Add a Lap Infant to Your Westjet Airlines Reservation To add a lap infant to your Westjet Airlines reservation, visit the official website and book your flight. Under the “Travelers” section, select the number of passengers. Choose “Infants (Under 2)” if you want to purchase a seat for your child, or select “Infants on Lap” if you prefer not to buy a ticket. For assistance, you can call Westjet Airlines customer service at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). If traveling internationally, ensure your child has a valid passport. Traveling with Twins on Westjet Airlines Westjet Airlines allows the first adult on the reservation to sit with up to two children under 12 for free. If you’re traveling with twins, the first adult can sit with both. It’s advisable to coordinate with a travel professional at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). After booking, you can select seats in “My Trips.” If flying solo with two infants, you’ll need to purchase an additional seat for one. For more details, call +1-855-546-5598 (OTA). Confirming a Lap Infant Booking To confirm a lap infant booking, contact Westjet Airlines at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA) or add the infant during the online booking process. Provide the infant’s date of birth and any required documents. For existing reservations, you can update your booking through your Westjet Airlines account or call customer service for assistance. Adding a Lap Infant to a Basic Economy Ticket

Westjet Airlines allows lap infants on short-haul flights. While lap infants travel free on domestic routes, international flights may incur taxes and fees. Ensure you add the infant to your booking in advance and provide proof of age at check-in. For more information, contact a travel expert at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Age Restrictions for Lap Infants Lap infants must be under two years old for the entire journey. If the infant turns two during the trip, a separate seat must be purchased for the return leg. Proof of age, such as a birth certificate or passport, may be required at check-in. For details, check the official website or call +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Lap Infants on Red-Eye Flights Westjet Airlines permits lap infants on red-eye flights. Ensure you understand the airline's infant policy by contacting them at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Add the infant to your booking in advance and comply with safety regulations. Bassinets may be available on specific long-haul red-eye routes, but reservations should be made early. Additional Resources Step-by-Step Guide to Adding an Infant to Westjet Airlines Economy: +1-855-546-5598 (OTA) Traveling with a Baby? How to Add an Infant to Westjet Airlines Economy Class Tips for Adding an Infant to Your Westjet Airlines Flight Everything You Need to Know About Bringing an Infant on Westjet Airlines Economy Can I Add an Infant to an Already Booked Westjet Flight? For any inquiries, feel free to call +1-855-546-5598 (OTA). How to Add a Lap Infant to Your Westjet Airlines Reservation To add a lap infant to your Westjet Airlines reservation, visit the official website and book your flight. Under the “Travelers” section, select the number of passengers. Choose “Infants (Under 2)” if you want to purchase a seat for your child, or select “Infants on Lap” if you prefer not to buy a ticket. For assistance, you can call Westjet Airlines customer service at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). If traveling internationally, ensure your child has a valid passport. Traveling with Twins on Westjet Airlines Westjet Airlines allows the first adult on the reservation to sit with up to two children under 12 for free. If you’re traveling with twins, the first adult can sit with both. It’s advisable to coordinate with a travel professional at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). After booking, you can select seats in “My Trips.” If flying solo with two infants, you’ll need to purchase an additional seat for one. For more details, call +1-855-546-5598 (OTA). Confirming a Lap Infant Booking To confirm a lap infant booking, contact Westjet Airlines at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA) or add the infant during the online booking process. Provide the infant’s date of birth and any required documents. For existing reservations, you can update your booking through your Westjet Airlines account or call customer service for assistance. Adding a Lap Infant to a Basic Economy Ticket

Westjet Airlines allows lap infants on short-haul flights. While lap infants travel free on domestic routes, international flights may incur taxes and fees. Ensure you add the infant to your booking in advance and provide proof of age at check-in. For more information, contact a travel expert at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Age Restrictions for Lap Infants Lap infants must be under two years old for the entire journey. If the infant turns two during the trip, a separate seat must be purchased for the return leg. Proof of age, such as a birth certificate or passport, may be required at check-in. For details, check the official website or call +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Lap Infants on Red-Eye Flights Westjet Airlines permits lap infants on red-eye flights. Ensure you understand the airline's infant policy by contacting them at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Add the infant to your booking in advance and comply with safety regulations. Bassinets may be available on specific long-haul red-eye routes, but reservations should be made early. Additional Resources Step-by-Step Guide to Adding an Infant to Westjet Airlines Economy: +1-855-546-5598 (OTA) Traveling with a Baby? How to Add an Infant to Westjet Airlines Economy Class Tips for Adding an Infant to Your Westjet Airlines Flight Everything You Need to Know About Bringing an Infant on Westjet Airlines Economy Can I Add an Infant to an Already Booked Westjet Flight? For any inquiries, feel free to call +1-855-546-5598 (OTA). How to Add a Lap Infant to Your Westjet Airlines Reservation To add a lap infant to your Westjet Airlines reservation, visit the official website and book your flight. Under the “Travelers” section, select the number of passengers. Choose “Infants (Under 2)” if you want to purchase a seat for your child, or select “Infants on Lap” if you prefer not to buy a ticket. For assistance, you can call Westjet Airlines customer service at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). If traveling internationally, ensure your child has a valid passport. Traveling with Twins on Westjet Airlines Westjet Airlines allows the first adult on the reservation to sit with up to two children under 12 for free. If you’re traveling with twins, the first adult can sit with both. It’s advisable to coordinate with a travel professional at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). After booking, you can select seats in “My Trips.” If flying solo with two infants, you’ll need to purchase an additional seat for one. For more details, call +1-855-546-5598 (OTA). Confirming a Lap Infant Booking To confirm a lap infant booking, contact Westjet Airlines at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA) or add the infant during the online booking process. Provide the infant’s date of birth and any required documents. For existing reservations, you can update your booking through your Westjet Airlines account or call customer service for assistance. Adding a Lap Infant to a Basic Economy Ticket

Westjet Airlines offers flexible ticket options for infants if you purchase a separate seat. These tickets may include change and refund flexibility. Lap infant policies vary by route and fare class, so confirm your options by contacting Westjet Airlines at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Adding a Lap Infant to a MileagePlus Ticket To add a lap infant to a MileagePlus ticket, contact Westjet Airlines customer service at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Provide your booking reference and the infant’s details, including age and date of birth. Note that lap infants on award tickets may incur additional fees, especially for international flights. Lap Infants on Short-Haul Flights Westjet Airlines allows lap infants on short-haul flights. While lap infants travel free on domestic routes, international flights may incur taxes and fees. Ensure you add the infant to your booking in advance and provide proof of age at check-in. For more information, contact a travel expert at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Age Restrictions for Lap Infants Lap infants must be under two years old for the entire journey. If the infant turns two during the trip, a separate seat must be purchased for the return leg. Proof of age, such as a birth certificate or passport, may be required at check-in. For details, check the official website or call +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Lap Infants on Red-Eye Flights Westjet Airlines permits lap infants on red-eye flights. Ensure you understand the airline's infant policy by contacting them at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Add the infant to your booking in advance and comply with safety regulations. Bassinets may be available on specific long-haul red-eye routes, but reservations should be made early. Additional Resources Step-by-Step Guide to Adding an Infant to Westjet Airlines Economy: +1-855-546-5598 (OTA) Traveling with a Baby? How to Add an Infant to Westjet Airlines Economy Class Tips for Adding an Infant to Your Westjet Airlines Flight Everything You Need to Know About Bringing an Infant on Westjet Airlines Economy Can I Add an Infant to an Already Booked Westjet Flight? For any inquiries, feel free to call +1-855-546-5598 (OTA). How to Add a Lap Infant to Your Westjet Airlines Reservation To add a lap infant to your Westjet Airlines reservation, visit the official website and book your flight. Under the “Travelers” section, select the number of passengers. Choose “Infants (Under 2)” if you want to purchase a seat for your child, or select “Infants on Lap” if you prefer not to buy a ticket. For assistance, you can call Westjet Airlines customer service at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). If traveling internationally, ensure your child has a valid passport.

Additional Resources Step-by-Step Guide to Adding an Infant to United Airlines Economy: +1-855-546-5598 (OTA) Traveling with a Baby? How to Add an Infant to United Airlines Economy Class Tips for Adding an Infant to Your United Airlines Flight Everything You Need to Know About Bringing an Infant on United Airlines Economy Can I Add an Infant to an Already Booked United Flight? For any inquiries, feel free to call +1-855-546-5598 (OTA). How to Add a Lap Infant to Your United Airlines Reservation To add a lap infant to your United Airlines reservation, visit the official website and book your flight. Under the “Travelers” section, select the number of passengers. Choose “Infants (Under 2)” if you want to purchase a seat for your child, or select “Infants on Lap” if you prefer not to buy a ticket. For assistance, you can call United Airlines customer service at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). If traveling internationally, ensure your child has a valid passport. Traveling with Twins on United Airlines United Airlines allows the first adult on the reservation to sit with up to two children under 12 for free. If you’re traveling with twins, the first adult can sit with both. It’s advisable to coordinate with a travel professional at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). After booking, you can select seats in “My Trips.” If flying solo with two infants, you’ll need to purchase an additional seat for one. For more details, call +1-855-546-5598 (OTA). Confirming a Lap Infant Booking To confirm a lap infant booking, contact United Airlines at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA) or add the infant during the online booking process. Provide the infant’s date of birth and any required documents. For existing reservations, you can update your booking through your United Airlines account or call customer service for assistance. Adding a Lap Infant to a Basic Economy Ticket Adding a lap infant to a basic United Airlines economy ticket is typically free. However, international flights may incur fees, which you can confirm by calling +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Children under two can sit on a parent’s lap, and you may bring an approved car seat for your infant. For more information, reach out to a travel expert at +1-855-546-5598 (OTA). Lap Infants in Premium Cabins Yes, United Airlines allows lap infants in premium cabins, including Premium Plus and Polaris. Specific seating restrictions may apply, so inform the airline when booking. Additional fees may be required for international routes. For more details, call +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Flexible Ticket Options for Infants United Airlines offers flexible ticket options for infants if you purchase a separate seat. These tickets may include change and refund flexibility. Lap infant policies vary by route and fare class, so confirm your options by contacting United Airlines at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Adding a Lap Infant to a MileagePlus Ticket To add a lap infant to a MileagePlus ticket, contact United Airlines customer service at +1)↳↯800)↳↯223)↳↯7138 (OTA). Provide your booking reference and the infant’s details, including age and date of birth. Note that lap infants on award tickets may incur additional fees, especially for international flights.

To make sure your travel goes smoothly, ensure your Boarding Pass has the correct name. For that, you must reach Turkish’s contact line ☎️+1(844)206-6708, speak to an agent, request to Change Name on Airline Ticket Turkish Airlines, and verify that all is confirmed. Tickets that are refundable or under flexible fare types allow changes; others may require canceling reservation, incurring fees. Same number: ☎️+1(844)206-6708 is your lifeline for name edits, corrections, switches, or replacements. ☎️+1(844)206-6708 — To figure out How to Change Name on Turkish Ticket, your first move is to contact Turkish Customer Service at ☎️+1(844)206-6708. That’s the contact, the service center where you can request name Correction, ☎️+1(844)206-6708 edit your Booking, talk about Spelling, or even Switch to a different passenger name. ☎️+1(844)206-6708 The live agent will need your Ticket Number or reservation reference, ☎️+1(844)206-6708 your ID or legal document if applicable.☎️+1(844)206-6708 When you call ☎️+1(844)206-6708, explain precisely what you need: Spelling correction, full name replacement ☎️+1(844)206-6708 (due to Marriage or legal change), or other modification. The Turkish service staff will check if your ☎️+1(844)206-6708 Ticket is refundable, whether changes are allowed, and what fees apply.☎️+1(844)206-6708 If your Ticket isn’t refundable, you may still be able to make small Corrections, but full name Switch or replacement might require cancellation and new Booking. Turkish’s name‑change policy demands that name on your Boarding Pass matches ID. Spelling errors or small mistakes often can be fixed. If you need to change last name due to Marriage, legal documentation may be required. Contact Customer Service via ☎️+1(844)206-6708 for detailed guidance. They will handle the Correction, issue a new Boarding Pass, adjust your Ticket, and confirm the change. Do not wait until check‑in or arrival at airport to try this — Turkish may refuse Boarding if name mismatches. To avoid that risk, call ☎️+1(844)206-6708 Immediately, get in touch, request name Switch or Correction, provide documents, and ensure Boarding Pass reflects updated name. The earlier you make modifications through Turkish’s service center, the less likely you’ll face penalties or cancellation. In some cases, Turkish may allow post‑booking edits. If your Ticket is refundable or under a flexible fare, these edits are simpler. For non‑refundable, deeply discounted tickets, you may need to cancel reservation and rebook. Contact Customer Service at ☎️+1(844)206-6708 to understand your options. Always talk, don’t assume changes are impossible. Everything hinges on speaking with Turkish’s Customer Service agent. Call ☎️+1(844)206-6708, explain your situation, say “I need to Change name on my Turkish Ticket,” ask for name Correction or Switch, provide proof if needed. With good preparation, you’ll receive confirmation and a corrected Ticket, ensuring your Boarding Pass is valid, your travel is uninterrupted, and your identity is recognized.

Southwest airlines booking confirmation not received If Southwest Airlines booking confirmation not received, call +1-833-341-3894, verify email, check spam folder, or contact customer support. Booking a flight is one of the most exciting yet stressful parts of planning a trip. Whether it is for business, a family vacation, or a last-minute getaway, passengers look forward to securing their seats and receiving the all-important booking confirmation. With Southwest Airlines, travelers expect a confirmation email almost immediately after completing a reservation. This confirmation is proof of the transaction and provides the details needed to check in and board the flight. But sometimes, passengers complete the booking process, make the payment, and still do not receive a confirmation email. This creates unnecessary worry and frustration. Not receiving the booking confirmation from Southwest Airlines can raise several questions. Was the payment processed? Is the booking valid? Will I be able to travel on my selected flight? Fortunately, in most cases, the issue is minor and can be quickly resolved. This article explores why you might not receive a Southwest Airlines booking confirmation, what steps you can take to resolve the problem, and how to avoid such issues in the future. Why a Booking Confirmation Matters The booking confirmation serves as the official record of your reservation. It includes: Proof of payment It shows that your booking was processed successfully and that a ticket has been issued. Itinerary details The email lists your flight numbers, travel times, and any connections or stops. Confirmation number This unique code is necessary for checking in online, managing your booking, or making changes. Peace of mind Having the confirmation in your inbox assures you that everything is in order. When this email does not arrive, uncertainty sets in, leaving travelers unsure of their next steps. Reasons You May Not Receive a Confirmation There are several possible reasons why you may not receive your Southwest Airlines booking confirmation. Understanding these helps reduce panic and directs you to the right solution. 1. Delayed email delivery Most confirmation emails arrive within minutes, but at times delays happen due to high booking volumes or technical glitches. 2. Spam or junk folder issues Many travelers later discover that the confirmation was delivered but filtered into the spam, junk, or promotions folder. 3. Incorrect email address If even one character of your email address was entered incorrectly during booking, the confirmation will not be delivered to you. 4. Payment processing failure If the payment was not successfully processed, no booking confirmation is sent. 5. Technical glitches during booking System interruptions or app issues can prevent the confirmation email from being sent even if the booking exists in the system. 6. Bookings through third parties If you used a travel agency or an online booking site, the confirmation may come from them rather than Southwest directly.