Epr Quotes

Under the microscope of quantum attention function we can explain EPR paradox, bell inequalities, W and GHZ state, quantum entanglement, decoherence, nonlocality, and quantum correlations in a coherent manner.

Later Michel went up to the priest as he was packing away the tools of the trade. “I was very interested in what you were saying earlier…” The man of God smiled urbanely, then Michel began to talk about the Aspect experiments and the EPR paradox: how two particle, once united, are forever and inseparable whole, “which seems pretty much in keeping with what you were saying about one flesh.” The priest’s smile froze slightly. “What I’m trying to say, “Michel went on enthusiastically, “is that from an ontological point of view, the pair can be assigned a single vector in Hilbert space. Do you see what I mean?

Einstein’s primary concerns were not with randomness but with realism and locality. His determination to salvage these principles culminated in the EPR paper and their argument that quantum mechanics must be incomplete.

The resulting four-page paper, published in May 1935 and known by the initials of its authors as the EPR paper, was the most important paper Einstein would write after moving to America. “Can the Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Regarded as Complete?” they asked in their title.

Einstein and his colleagues made the perfectly reasonable assumption of locality: that the properties of a particle are localized on that particle, and what happens here can’t affect what happens there without some way of transmitting the effects across the intervening space. It seems so self-evident that it hardly appears to be an assumption at all. But this locality is just what quantum entanglement undermines – which is why ‘spooky action at a distance’ is precisely the wrong way to look at it. We can’t regard particle A and particle B in the EPR experiment as separate entities, even though they are separated in space. As far as quantum mechanics is concerned, entanglement makes them both parts of a single object. Or to put it another way, the spin of particle A is not located solely on A in the way that the redness of a cricket ball is located on the cricket ball. In quantum mechanics, properties can be non-local. Only if we accept Einstein’s assumption of locality do we need to tell the story in terms of a measurement on particle A ‘influencing’ the spin of particle B. Quantum non-locality is the alternative to that view.

Los objetos físicos no son cosas en sí (y esto vale también para las estrellas y las galaxias), sino cosas con respecto a ciertos modos de indagación empírica. Como decía Niels Bohr, la física no trata de la naturaleza, sino de nuestras relaciones con la naturaleza. El universo, lejos de ser un conjunto de objetos, es una red de percepciones. Todo está conectado con todo, nos dice el teorema de interconexión de Bell. La paradoja EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) sugiere que la idea de la separabilidad debe revisarse. Las partículas no pueden, no saben, llevar una existencia independiente. Si algún día estuvieron en contacto, conservarán para siempre la memoria de ese encuentro. Los fenómenos, como los dioses, son locales, pero la totalidad no lo es, y esa conexión con la totalidad parece estar presente en todo momento.

As soon as you realize that quantum mechanics is about the mind-matter interface, all of its mysteriousness vanishes. Its properties are exactly what you would expect where mind is more important than matter. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, Pauli’s Exclusion principle, Bell’s inequality, non-localism, particles being in two places at one, wave-particle duality, particles taking all paths to reach their destination, the EPR paradox – all of these are about THE MIND. None of these can be explained in terms of deterministic, classical particles. Materialism has died, but the materialists haven’t realized it. They’re still locked into their Meta Paradigm.

The scientific (not to mention philosophical and metaphysical) implications are astounding. Let's say some of the atoms in your body originally formed in an entangled manner with other particles soon after the big bang. Since then, both have been flying apart, and now they are separated by billions of light-years. Your atoms make up pieces of your brain, which is physically located in Peoria. Those other particles have become of an alien on a planet in the fashionable Aldebaran system. Right now, some creature there is observing your twin's atoms in a lab. Bingo, they collapse to exhibit specific properties. Instantly, with no delay whatsoever, your own brain's atoms know this is happening five billion light-years away, and they, too, collapse into complementary objects. The effect is sudden and alters your thought processes, and you make a snap decision. You show up at your boss's party wearing an embarrassing, polka-dot tuxedo. You can't explain why you acted so oddly, but your life is ruined. This seems like science fiction, but EPR correlations are real. First it means that the entire universe is a single entity in some fundamental way. It means there are no secrets between locations here and those far away, no matter how distant–and that the information "exchange" happens simultaneously, at infinite speed.

All the uncertainty is gone. I feel like myself again. I lose myself in the plan. I’m going to need tools. A quantum pyramid scheme. A pair of physical bodies, a nugget of computronium, a bunch of entangled EPR pairs and a few very special hydrogen bombs …

impossible effect: what Einstein called ‘spooky action at a distance’. This was the EPR paradox.

Thanks to Bell, it became possible to put the EPR experiment to the test and find out who was right. This has now been done many times.

But this locality is just what quantum entanglement undermines – which is why ‘spooky action at a distance’ is precisely the wrong way to look at it. We can’t regard particle A and particle B in the EPR experiment as separate entities, even though they are separated in space. As far as quantum mechanics is concerned, entanglement makes them both parts of a single object. Or to put it another way, the spin of particle A is not located solely on A in the way that the redness of a cricket ball is located on the cricket ball. In quantum mechanics, properties can be non-local. Only if we accept Einstein’s assumption of locality do we need to tell the story in terms of a measurement on particle A ‘influencing’ the spin of particle B. Quantum non-locality is the alternative to that view. What in fact we’re dealing with here is another kind of quantum superposition. We’ve seen that superposition refers to a situation in which a measurement on a quantum object could produce two or more possible outcomes, but we don’t know which it will be, only their relative probabilities. Entanglement is that same idea applied to two or more particles: a superposition of the state in which particle A has spin up and B spin down, say, and the state with the opposite configuration. Although the particles are separated, they must be described by a single wavefunction. We can’t untangle that wavefunction into some combination of two single-particle wavefunctions. Quantum mechanics is able to embrace such a notion without batting an eyelid; we can simply write down the math. The problem is in visualizing what it means.

南京秦淮区外围 (外围女)外围上门服务【VX~156*8059*3589】【见面满意再给钱，当面给钱更安全】-这里有各地小姐、兼职、大学生、外围女、大圈中圈KaEpr

滁州南谯区高端外围模特资源{无限咨询网址m5255.cc真实上门服务}滁州南谯区哪里有小姐服务-滁州南谯区怎么找外围约炮{无限咨询网址m5255.cc真实上门服务}高端外围、同城约炮、洋妞、姑娘、网红、模特、妹子、空姐、白领、大学生、小妹-滁州南谯区找小姐全套服务-滁州南谯区这边推油桑拿小姐妹*〔服务〕联系方式(Yh02Kc)eprJZ