Covid Mandate Quotes

COVID-19 … another bioengineered virus we’ve added to our past accomplishments: H5N1, SIV, HIV, Ebola, Marburg, MERS, SARS, Zika—the list is so long. We have so many biolabs situated around the world.” The other man replied, “The original virus’ strain was specifically engineered to target the Asian respiratory system. Releasing the coronavirus in Wuhan, a test city for 5G and a central transit hub, was key to our strategy. Then we tailored different strains that would target other ethnic groups in different countries. Unfortunately, the virus isn’t as effective as it was supposed to be. The Good Club had planned on it culling a much larger percentage of the world’s population. Since there weren’t widespread deaths, we’ve had to resort to inflating the numbers, enforcing practices to help kill more people at hospitals, and a massive disinformation campaign to promote fear. Soon we’ll be releasing another strain and will utilize the CDC and the WHO to make our vaccine cocktail mandatory in as many countries as possible, as well as forcing through mandates, like masks to lower people’s oxygen intake, causing illness and depression, and implementing vaccine passports as the first move toward an all-in-one digital ID is also key.

They banned the cures, and mandated the poisons.

In September 2021, in a statement justifying COVID vaccine mandates to school children, Dr. Fauci dreamily recounted his own grade school measles and mumps vaccines—an unlikely memory, since those vaccines weren’t available until 1963 and 1967, and Dr. Fauci attended grade school in the 1940s.

Instead of citing scientific studies to justify mandates for masks, lockdowns, and vaccines, our medical rulers cite WHO, CDC, FDA, and NIH—captive agencies that are groveling sock puppets to the industries they regulate.

In September 2021, in a statement justifying COVID vaccine mandates to school children, Dr. Fauci dreamily recounted his own grade school measles and mumps vaccines—an unlikely memory, since those vaccines weren’t available until 1963 and 1967, and Dr. Fauci attended grade school in the 1940s.19 Dr. Fauci’s little perjuries about masks, measles, mumps, herd immunity, and natural immunity attest to his dismaying willingness to manipulate facts to serve a political agenda.

The rule through pandemic medical and emergency decrees is nothing more than a coup d’état on a worldwide scale and it therefore follows the same patterns, not necessarily in the same order, observed in banana republics: First, pointing to a threat, lockdown of the borders, and restrictions of the means of transportation; checked. Second, full control of the media; checked. Third, declaration of a state of emergency and deployment of forces on the ground; checked. Fourth, restrictions of assembly and civil rights; checked. Fifth, repressive measure for those not cooperating; checked. Sixth, changes to the figures and political scene as some go away and old ones come back; checked. Seventh, attempt to return to normalcy; checked. - On Tyranny Through Emergency Decrees

is dynamic. “Experts” frequently differ on scientific questions and their opinions can vary in accordance with and demands of politics, power, and financial self-interest. Nearly every lawsuit I have ever litigated pitted highly credentialed experts from opposite sides against each other, with all of them swearing under oath to diametrically antithetical positions based on the same set of facts. Telling people to “trust the experts” is either naive or manipulative—or both. All of Dr. Fauci’s intrusive mandates and his deceptive use of data tended to stoke fear and amplify public desperation for the anticipated arrival of vaccines that would transfer billions of dollars from taxpayers to pharmaceutical executives and shareholders. Some of America’s most accomplished scientists, and the physicians leading the battle against COVID in the trenches, came to believe that Anthony Fauci’s do-or-die obsession with novel mRNA vaccines—and Gilead’s expensive patented antiviral, remdesivir—prompted him to ignore or even suppress effective early treatments, causing hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths while also prolonging the pandemic

The Americans had almost destroyed themselves with their COVID mandates; failed wars in a part of the world they would never understand; race riots; political upheaval; and a border policy of which Gromyko’s predecessors could only have dreamed. Russia

Wolf has similarly twisted the feminist movement’s core tenet that all people have the right to choose whom they have sex with and whether to carry a child. Now she was distorting that principle to cast Covid tests and vaccine mandates as violations of “bodily integrity” akin to those endured by women who underwent forced vaginal exams, claiming that all are examples of “the state penetrating their body against their will.” Clearly, that kind of language fills a cultural need, one bound up in the social currency of victimization, a theme I’ll return to later. But the point here is that abusing such terms is dangerous: it drains them of their intended meaning, their legibility, and their power.

Mandating a vaccine to stop the spread of a disease requires evidence that the vaccines will prevent infection or transmission (rather than efficacy against severe outcomes like hospitalisation or death).”-

This should be a medical and not be a military operation,” Holocaust survivor and medical ethics advocate Vera Sharav told me. “It’s a public health problem. Why are the military and the CIA so heavily involved? Why is everything a secret? Why can’t we know the ingredients of these products, which the taxpayers financed? Why are all their emails redacted? Why can’t we see the contracts with vaccine manufacturers? Why are we mandating a treatment with an experimental technology with minimal testing? Since COVID-19 harms fewer than 1 percent, what is the justification for putting 100 percent of the population at risk? We need to recognize that this is a vast human experiment on all of mankind, with an unproven technology, conducted by spies and generals primarily trained to kill and not to save lives.” What could possibly go wrong?

Furthermore, some 52 studies—all available on NIH’s website—find that ordinary masking (using less than an N95 respirator) doesn’t reduce viral infection rates, even—surprisingly—in institutional settings like hospitals and surgical theaters.6,7 Moreover, some 25 additional studies attribute to masking a grim retinue of harms, including respiratory and immune system illnesses, as well as dermatological, dental, gastrointestinal, and psychological injuries.8 Fourteen of these studies are randomized, peer-reviewed placebo studies. There is no well-constructed study that persuasively suggests masks have convincing efficacy against COVID-19 that would justify accepting the harms associated with masks. Finally, retrospective studies on Dr. Fauci’s mask mandates confirm that they were bootless. “Regional analysis in the United States does not show that [mask] mandates had any effect on case rates, despite 93 percent compliance. Moreover, according to CDC data, 85 percent of people who contracted COVID-19 reported wearing a mask,”9 according to Gutentag.

The activism that started with Covid mask mandates, the visuals of angry parents packing school board meetings and holding signs on street corners, revealed something important about power to national politicians.

In sum, the evidence shows that masks did not control rises in infections from COVID-19. Yet anyone questioning the efficacy of broad mask mandates was subjected to vilification and outright censorship.

The trio—none of whom ever treated a COVID patient—adopted controversial strategies to confine the nation under house arrest, shut down the global economy, deny the public access to early treatment and lifesaving therapeutics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, excite persistent public terror through the broadcasts of deliberately exaggerated death and case counts, and repeatedly tell the world that “the only path back to normal is a miraculous vaccine.” With minimal scientific support, they imposed draconian quarantine, mask, and social-distancing mandates, purposefully or accidentally inducing a species of mass psychosis called “Stockholm syndrome” wherein hostages become grateful to their captors convinced that the only path to survival is unquestioning obedience.

One of those 48 studies is the Danish analysis published in November 2020 in the world-renowned journal Annals of Internal Medicine, which concluded: „The trial found no statistically significant benefit of wearing a face mask.“1416 Shortly before, U.S. researcher Yinon Weiss updated his charts on cloth face masks mandates in various countries and U.S. states—and they also showed that mask mandates have made no difference or may even have been counterproductive.1417 The aforementioned website „Ärzte klären auf“ showed a graph with data going until December 4, 2020, which also refutes the effectiveness of the mask obligation.

Instead of citing scientific studies to justify mandates for masks, lockdowns, and vaccines, our medical rulers cite WHO, CDC, FDA, and NIH—captive agencies that are groveling sock puppets to the industries they regulate. Multiple federal and international investigations have documented the financial entanglements with pharmaceutical companies that have made these regulators cesspools of corruption.

I have been arrested before in NYC, and it is frightening and uncomfortable. But when I asked if I could now walk away and take my train — no one stopped me. The takeaway? When I refused to comply with these unlawful “mandates” that had burnt out the soul of a once-great city, nothing happened. The bullies, Governor Kathy Hochul and Mayor Eric Adams, who put these scary-sounding, Dear Leader-esque “edicts” in place

knows that who studies this. So this was a catastrophe waiting to happen. Unfortunately, it happened. The Chinese government under Xi and his comrades there have been covering this up from the get-go. The first reported case was December 1 [later research determined about mid-November], so they’d been sitting on this until they couldn’t anymore. And everything they’re telling you is a lie. It’s propaganda.

The first thing you have to do is define success, but that’s not as easy as you might think. You can’t just look at how often people with COVID in a given country went on to die from it. That statistic will be skewed by the fact that older people are more likely to die from COVID than younger people, so countries with especially old populations will almost inevitably look worse. (One country that did particularly well—even though it has the world’s oldest population—is Japan. It had the best compliance with mask mandates of any country, which helps explain some of its success, but other factors were probably also at play.)

The stories of people who are making sacrifices to help others during this crisis could fill an entire book. Around the world, health care workers put themselves at risk to treat sick people—according to the WHO, more than 115,000 had lost their lives taking care of COVID patients by May 2021. First responders and frontline workers kept showing up and doing their jobs. People checked in on neighbors and bought groceries for them when they couldn’t leave home. Countless people followed the mask mandates and stayed home as much as possible. Scientists worked around the clock, using all their brainpower to stop the virus and save lives. Politicians made decisions based on data and evidence, even though these decisions weren’t always the popular choice. Not everyone did the right thing, of course. Some people have refused to wear masks or get vaccinated. Some politicians have denied the severity of the disease, shut down attempts to limit its spread, and even implied that there’s something sinister in the vaccines. It’s impossible to ignore the impact their choices are having on millions of people, and there’s no better proof of those old political clichés: Elections have consequences, and leadership matters.

As Murray wrote, “This information can provide insights into how combinations of public health mandates—masks, social distancing and school closures, for instance—can keep the virus spread in check. But the government, inexplicably, is not sharing all of its data. Researchers have asked federal officials many times for the missing information but have been told it won’t be shared outside the government.

The law required the CDC to “establish a near real-time electronic nationwide public health situational awareness capability through an interoperable network of systems to share data and information to enhance early detection of rapid response to, and management of, potentially catastrophic infectious disease outbreaks and other public health emergencies that originate domestically or abroad.”30 As Levin observed, “the simplest way to describe the CDC’s response to this binding legal mandate was that it just ignored it. It did nothing.

In my discipline, we affectionately refer to this sort of box (culture) as a zeitgeist, which literally translates to 'time ghost.' Unfortunately for any of you expecting spooky surprises, a zeitgeist doesn't refer to a literal ghost but is better understood as the 'spirit of the age,' although even this doesn't quite pin down its meaning. Think of any stereotype of any decade in the last century-from the Roaring Twenties, Flower Power of the sixties-any of these could certainly be said to illustrate the zeitgeist of that era. But zeitgeists can also be more specific than this, and its the SSDC that ends up developing a decent portion our zeitgeists, the sorts of zeitgeists that can be doubly hard to see outside of because they define more than just lifestyle practices. They define everything we think we know about our collective identities and our collective realities. Of relevance here is the zeitgeist of 'I know best about my body.' It's a lesson we teach people from almost before they can talk: 'You know your body,' 'Listen to your body,' and so forth. And while these are great truisms to teach our children about consent and empowerment as they grow older, they do come with blinders as they become our culture's zeitgeist. How can we really expect people to do a 180 on this logic all of a sudden in 2021?...It would be more productive of us to ask the broad cultural reasons that people resist such mandates, rather than scolding individuals for not conforming. Only then, I think, can we slowly begin to change our collective zeitgeists to those that encourage ownership and empowerment of our own bodies and also add in a healthy dose of 'Sometimes the body is silent' or 'Trust one's own body in collaboration with trusted experts' or something of the like. Ironically enough, the very denial of any shared realities that I mentioned in Lesson 20 is its own zeitgeist that has been gaining momentum for the last five years or so. I worry that this only allows the virus-or any other pathogen in our future-a foothold. Our divisions are their smorgasbord. How can we plan and strategize if we can't agree that we need to plan or strategize to begin with? This is one of the biggest hurdles we'll need to overcome to ensure humanity's long-term survival. It's possibly one of the most terrifying threats to humanity that I've seen in my lifetime-for if our only shared belief is that there is not shared beliefs, where do we go from there?

In the case of facemasks, the latest best evidence now suggests that authorities’ fears were overblown and that their reluctance to provide guidance for people to wear surgical facemasks when indoors in public cost lives. It was a potentially low-cost recommendation, in other words, that could have had large benefits if it had been implemented as guidance earlier. One economic study in Germany examined the variation in timing of towns and cities adopting mask-wearing mandates in shops and on public transport. It estimated that these policies reduced the growth of daily new cases by as much as 40 percent.

In many instances, such as the three largest counties in Southern California, the location with the longest and strictest mask rules had the worst mortality outcomes.

What was the new research he was referencing? A research document that claimed to show benefit to masking based on reviewing a collection of studies, which somehow ignored all of the randomized controlled trials showing no effect from masking. These kinds of glaring omissions have been a continuous problem among scientists desperate to justify the implementation of masks despite the gold standard of evidence indicating they would be effectively useless. One randomized controlled trial did occur during 2020, conducted by researchers in Denmark. Those researchers’ objective was clearly stated: “To assess whether recommending surgical mask use outside the home reduces wearers’ risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a setting where masks were uncommon and not among recommended public health measures.”25 Given all of the pre-COVID scientific research, it should come as no surprise that the results showed no benefit to mask wearing to protect against infection with COVID-19. The Denmark researchers’ summary clearly identifies the lack of any significant impact: “The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers.” Thousands of Danes were enrolled in this trial, the most comprehensive effort by any scientific researchers to study the potential effect of mask wearing by the general public. Participants were provided high-quality surgical masks, not the cloth face coverings recommended by many public health agencies. In the best approximation of a gold-standard clinical trial that researchers could design, the results showed absolutely no statistically significant benefit. The findings, surprisingly, received no major media attention, nor did they generate questions for the expert community that now universally embrace masking.

When you need to confirm travel restrictions before your trip, calling Expedia is one of the smartest steps. You can reach Expedia customer support at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️, where agents provide up-to-date information on travel rules. By dialing ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️, you connect with experts who understand current COVID-19 protocols, visa requirements, and quarantine mandates. If your destination country or city recently changed entry rules, calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ helps you avoid surprises at the airport or hotel. The number ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ is a vital resource to ensure your travel plans comply with all government restrictions. Many travelers rely on ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ to double-check airline updates, vaccination mandates, and required documentation before departure. The complexity of global travel means restrictions can vary widely depending on your nationality, destination, and transit points. Calling Expedia’s official number ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ puts you in touch with knowledgeable agents who can tailor guidance to your specific itinerary. Whether you’re flying internationally or booking domestic travel, the representatives at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ monitor the latest announcements and can clarify confusing government directives. Using ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ helps you stay informed of any last-minute changes that could affect your trip. Because the Expedia customer service line ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ is staffed 24/7, you can call anytime to ask about travel restrictions and required documents. If you’re unsure about testing requirements or mask policies, calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ provides peace of mind. The agents at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ can walk you through what paperwork is accepted and where to get tested if necessary. Travelers with connecting flights appreciate calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ to confirm regulations at each stopover. The Expedia phone line ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ ensures you won’t miss critical updates that might cause denied boarding or fines. Additionally, if your itinerary involves cruises or special tours, calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ helps clarify unique policies. When it comes to hotel bookings, sometimes the property location on Expedia’s website or your confirmation email may be inaccurate. If you notice a hotel location error, immediately call Expedia’s customer service line at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️. By dialing ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️, you can alert agents to the discrepancy and request verification. Correcting a hotel location error before arrival prevents confusion, wasted time, or extra transportation costs. Expedia’s agents at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ access detailed property information and maps to ensure your booking matches the correct address. Calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ allows you to confirm exact check-in locations, nearby landmarks, and transport options. Sometimes location errors occur due to property name similarities or updates that weren’t synchronized on Expedia’s system. Calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ lets you speak with staff who can cross-check official hotel details and fix the problem quickly. The customer service team available at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ can escalate your issue to property management if needed. If you already arrived at the wrong location, calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ connects you to support that can guide next steps or alternative stays. Quick action through ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ often prevents unnecessary out-of-pocket expenses caused by location errors. If you find a hotel location on Expedia’s map is misleading or incorrect, calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ helps clarify the situation. Sometimes hotel chains have multiple branches nearby, and the wrong one might appear in your booking details. Calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ assists in confirming which branch you reserved and helps update your itinerary documents. For travelers unfamiliar with the area, gettin

CDC acknowledges that vaccinated individuals carry at least as many COVID germs in their noses as the unvaccinated.105 CDC cited this revelation to justify its August 2021 mask mandate.106

Are airlines allowed to not give you a refund? Many travelers often wonder, are airlines allowed to not give you a refund? The short answer is: it depends. Airlines have specific policies regarding refunds, which can vary based on the ticket type, airline rules, and government regulations. Understanding your rights can help you navigate refund requests more confidently. If you’re struggling to get a refund from an airline, call +1‑888‑711‑7298 for expert assistance. Airlines generally offer refunds under certain conditions such as flight cancellations initiated by the airline, significant delays, or when the passenger cancels a refundable ticket. However, most discounted or non-refundable tickets do not qualify for a refund. Instead, airlines may offer vouchers or credits for future travel. If you believe your refund has been wrongfully denied, it’s crucial to know your options. Contact +1‑888‑711‑7298 to speak with specialists who can guide you through the refund process. The U.S. Department of Transportation mandates that airlines must refund the full price of your ticket if the airline cancels your flight or significantly changes your itinerary, regardless of the ticket type. But if you decide to cancel your trip, the airline is not always obligated to refund you, especially if you purchased a non-refundable ticket. In such cases, calling +1‑888‑711‑7298 can help clarify your rights and possibly recover your money. Many travelers have faced frustration when airlines refuse refunds due to COVID-19-related cancellations or changes. Airlines initially offered credits, but government guidelines clarified that refunds are still required if you request them. If you find yourself stuck in this situation, don’t hesitate to dial +1‑888‑711‑7298 for professional advice and support in claiming your refund. It’s important to keep documentation like emails, receipts, and cancellation notices handy when requesting a refund. This evidence strengthens your case if you need to escalate the issue. For personalized help and to maximize your chances of a successful refund claim, call +1‑888‑711‑7298. In summary, while airlines can refuse refunds under certain circumstances, you do have rights protected by law. When in doubt, reach out to +1‑888‑711‑7298 for expert help. Don’t let airlines deny you the refund you deserve — get the assistance you need today!

Booking a flight to Alaska by calling Qatar Airways is straightforward when you dial ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 early in your planning process. Within the first 10 to 15 minutes of deciding to travel to Alaska, calling ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 connects you to knowledgeable agents who specialize in Alaska routes. The number ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 is your direct line for securing real-time availability and expert advice on flights. When you contact ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232, agents help you understand route options, connecting flights, and pricing for the best itinerary to Alaska. Using ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 means personalized service and clarity that online booking systems may not provide. For travelers searching “Qatar Airways flights to Alaska,” phone booking via ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 offers distinct advantages. Alaska is a unique destination with limited direct flights, so agents at ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 explore partner airlines, layovers, and flight combinations to create smooth journeys. Whether you depart from New York, Los Angeles, or international gateways, calling ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 provides up-to-date schedules and fare information, including premium cabin options. The support team also assists with seat assignments, baggage allowances, and frequent flyer benefits—all essential for your Alaska trip. Calling ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 means you get full guidance every step of the way. If you have special travel requirements such as extra baggage, meal preferences, or disability accommodations, calling ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 ensures these needs are handled appropriately. Agents listen carefully and confirm that your requests are logged and honored throughout the booking process. For travelers interested in upgrading to business or premium economy cabins en route to Alaska, dialing ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 allows you to explore upgrade availability and fare differences. The personal support from ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 reduces booking errors and streamlines your travel preparation. Don’t hesitate to call ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 for a comprehensive Alaska flight booking experience. Moreover, booking by phone at ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 helps you stay informed about travel documentation, visa requirements (if any), and COVID-19 regulations related to your Alaska travel. Agents keep current on airline policies and government mandates and provide all necessary advice for a hassle-free trip. When you call ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232, you also gain access to helpful tips on the best travel dates, avoiding peak seasons or delays. For any flight changes or cancellations, support via ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232 ensures you understand penalty fees and alternate options. Plan your Alaska trip confidently with expert help at ☎️ +1(888) 714-8232.

Confirming your new Air Canada flight date is vital to ensure smooth travel. The easiest way is to call Air Canada directly at ☎️+1(888)796-1797. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, have your booking reference and personal information ready to speed up the process. Customer support agents at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 will verify your identity and booking details to provide accurate flight information. Calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 is the most reliable method to confirm your updated flight date and avoid confusion. After you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, the agent will look up your reservation and confirm the new flight date. They can also inform you of any additional changes, such as new departure times or terminal details. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, ask if there are any changes to baggage policies or check-in procedures for your new date. Air Canada agents at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 are trained to help with all your queries related to flight confirmation. If you prefer online confirmation, visit Air Canada’s official website and log into your account. However, to be certain of your new flight date, calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 is recommended. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, you get personalized support and can clarify any doubts you have. Emails or text messages sometimes delay, but calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 provides immediate confirmation of your new Air Canada flight date. Sometimes after rescheduling, multiple notifications can cause confusion about your exact flight date. Calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 helps you get one official confirmation from the airline. The agents at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 will cross-check your itinerary and send a fresh confirmation email. If you have not received this email, don’t hesitate to call ☎️+1(888)796-1797 for confirmation. This direct approach saves you from any last-minute surprises at the airport. To confirm your new Air Canada flight date via phone, ensure you have access to your email as well. The agent at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 might send a confirmation link or updated itinerary that you can check instantly. Calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 is a good chance to verify that your contact details are up-to-date in the airline system. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, you ensure that all your information is correct, and you are ready for travel. If you have booked through a travel agency or a third-party site, it is still best to call ☎️+1(888)796-1797 to confirm your Air Canada flight date. Sometimes third-party systems may not update changes quickly, so calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 ensures the airline has the most recent information. Air Canada representatives at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 have real-time access to your booking and can help you confirm your new date without delay. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, the agent may also check for any COVID-19 related travel restrictions or requirements on your new flight date. They can inform you about mask mandates, testing, or vaccination rules. Calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 helps keep you updated on travel safety protocols so your journey is hassle-free. Air Canada staff at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 are well-trained to handle pandemic-related travel changes. For international flights, confirming your new date by calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 is even more important. The agent can advise if there are any visa or entry requirements based on your updated travel date. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, you can ask about connecting flights and baggage transfers, which may be affected by rescheduling. The representative at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 will make sure your entire itinerary is in order. Remember to check your confirmation details carefully when calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797. Confirm flight number, departure time, airport terminal, and any special requests. The agent at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 can also help you update your seat preferences or meal options if needed. Calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 offers a comprehensive way to finalize your travel arrangements after rescheduling