Biomedical Sciences Quotes

Though biomedical science has vastly increased mankind’s average life expectancy, the maximum has not changed in verifiable recorded history.

My own experience of over 60 years in biomedical research amply demonstrated that without the use of animals and of human beings, it would have been impossible to acquire the important knowledge needed to prevent much suffering and premature death not only among humans but also among [other] animals.

Students who attend what they considered to be their first-choice school were less likely to persist in a biomedical or behavioral science major,” they write. You think you want to go to the fanciest school you can. You don’t.

In the past, [medicalization]has been portrayed as something that doctors inflict on a passive and un-suspecting world - an expansion of the Medical Empire. But in reality, it seems that these reductionist bio-medical stories can appeal to us all, because complex problems often have depressingly-complex causes, and the solutions can be taxing, and unsatisfactory.

At the same time we see the phenomenon of successful women adopting the standards of men with a vengeance. Will women's march to power ascendancy, won against all odds, mean that they too will choose to flaunt their preferences for red meat, animal skin, sport hunting, and even bullfighting? As women are swelling the ranks of biomedical science, many have adopted the practice of animal experimentation. Will animal exploitation become the ultimate symbol of equality with the white male?

Eva walked along the wall that held all of Michael's books. Shelves of science texts - physics, astronomy, a full set of Darwin's writings, new works in biomedical genetics - these were at the bottom, and books on philosophy and religion at the top. A row of poetry books caught her eye. Rumi, Whitman, Neruda - impossible to comprehend what he might be looking for in the poets' works he collected. Love possibly, but not love the way she understood it. She couldn't wait until she would no longer have to study, but Michael - he loved to study even when he wasn't a student.

A survey21 of beliefs about the causes of illness across cultures shows that the three most common explanations are biomedical (referring to physical causes of disease), interpersonal (illness is caused by witchcraft, related to envy and conflict), and moral (illness is caused by one’s own past actions, particularly violations of food and sexual taboos).

He agreed that BiDil should be approved without regard to race, noting that American cardiologists “jumped on the statin drugs” once the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study showed they were effective. “Would you restrict the results of the Scandinavian trial to Scandinavian people?” he asked. “I don’t think so.”17 Dr. Curry’s colleague Charles Rotimi, from Howard University’s National Human Genome Center, echoed this position. Rotimi warned that upholding an unproven biological explanation for health disparities would steer biomedical research in a dangerous direction. “It would be tragic not to approve [BiDil],” Rotimi said, “and it would be even more tragic just to approve it for African Americans.” 18

However, I have a stronger hunch that the greatest part of the important biomedical research waiting to be done is in the class of basic science. There is an abundance of interesting fact relating to all our major diseases, and more items of information are coming in steadily from all quarters in biology. The new mass of knowledge is still formless, in complete, lacking the essential threads of connection, displaying misleading signals at every turn, riddled with blind alleys. There are fascinating ideas all over the place, irresistible experiments beyond numbering, all sorts of new ways into the maze of problems. But every next move is unpredictable, every outcome uncertain. It is a puzzling time, but a very good time. I do not know how you lay out orderly plans for this kind of activity, but I suppose you could find out by looking through the disorderly records of the past hundred years. Somehow, the atmosphere has to be set so that a disquieting sense of being wrong is the normal attitude of the investigators. It has to be taken for granted that the only way in is by riding the unencumbered human imagination, with the special rigor required for recognizing that something can be highly improbable, maybe almost impossible, and at the same time true. Locally, a good way to tell how the work is going is to listen in the corridors. If you hear the word, "Impossible!" spoken as an expletive, followed by laughter, you will know that someone's orderly research plan is coming along nicely.

Stopping in the 1970s, "Hybridity" as the fifth and final chapter is less of an end point than a certain realization of the artifice, plasticity, and technology that Wells and Loeb envisioned as the future of the human relationship to living matter as well as of the "catastrophic" situation that Georges Canghuilhem (following Kurt Goldstein) saw in life subjected to the milieu of the laboratory.

Our focus, however, should not be on the differences among our sectors, but rather on supporting and promoting the entire innovation economy — from tech to bio to clean energy to health care and beyond. In fact, in its recent Impact 2020 report, the Massachusetts Biotechnology Council highlighted the interrelationship of these vital sectors working together, combining cutting-edge biomedical research with new information technology tools for capturing and integrating data, conducting sophisticated analytics, and enhancing personal connectivity. Massachusetts is a national and world leader in the growing field of life science information technology.

Benefit-sharing and equal access to advances in biomedical science are now urgent and universal issues’ [italics added].

First, there is a knowledge gap: the average doctor does not know as much about women’s bodies and the health problems that afflict them. It starts at the most basic level of biomedical research, where investigators overwhelmingly use male cells and animals in preclinical studies.

The idea of race was in retreat in the second half of the 20th century in the aftermath of the defeat of Nazism and discoveries in the science of genetics, although the 21st century has seen (unconvincing) attempts to revive the notion. Nowadays, there is a tendency to regard intercommunal hostilities as stemming from issues of cultural rather than racial difference, except on the very far right and among some who (misleadingly) base their assertions on recent biomedical research.

Which was briefly reassuring, until some biomedical statistician from the University of fucking Buzzkill went on record about the myth of the perfect failsafe,

It is one of the sad facts of biomedical science that the road to scientific progress is littered with the bodies of both humans and animals. The modern era of human experimentation began with the Nazis. Doctors and scientists performed horrific experiments on people held in concentration camps, and all of this was justified in the name of scientific progress.

We define empirical research in biomedical ethics as the application of research methods in the social sciences to the direct examination of issues in biomedical ethics

The Genetics of Asthma lab is one of countless research projects at universities and biotech firms around the country hunting for the genes that are responsible for health disparities in America. They are supplementing a large body of published studies that claim to show that racial gaps in disease prevalence or mortality are caused by genetic differences. In addition to asthma, disparities in infant mortality, diabetes, cancer, and hypertension have all been attributed in the scientific literature to genetic vulnerability that varies according to race. Most of these studies never even examined the genotypes of research subjects, as Burchard’s lab does; they just infer a genetic source of racial differences when they fail to find another explanation. As interest in health disparities converges with the genomic science of race, a new brand of racial stereotyping is gaining hold in biomedical research.

Equally as intriguing as the concept of personalized medicine is the proposal to develop the first drugs based on race. Think of the paradox: a classification system constructed centuries ago to enslave people became the portal for the most cutting-edge biomedical advance of the twenty-first century. Predicting drug response based on a patient’s race rather than on genetic traits, says Lawrence Lesco of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation Research, is “like telling time with a sundial instead of looking at a Rolex watch.

Pearl combines aspects of structural equations models and path diagrams. In this approach, assumptions underlying causal statements are coded as missing links in the path diagrams. Mathematical methods are then used to infer, from these path diagrams, which causal effects can be inferred from the data, and which cannot. Pearl's work is interesting, and many researchers find his arguments that path diagrams are a natural and convenient way to express assumptions about causal structures appealing. In our own work, perhaps influenced by the type of examples arising in social and medical sciences, we have not found this approach to aid drawing of causal inferences, and we do not discuss it further in this text.

Donald Seldin, a distinguished physician-scientist, in his widely publicized address titled “The Boundaries of Medicine”: Medicine is a very narrow discipline. Its goals may be defined as the relief of pain, the prevention of disability, and the postponement of death by the application . . . of medical science to individual patients. . . . A heritage which invests medicine with the priestly function of the counselor and comforter of the sick . . . has resulted [in] a tendency to construe all sorts of human problems as medical problems. This medicalization of human experience leads to enormous . . . frustration and disillusionment when medical intervention fails to eventuate in tranquility . . . and happiness. Human problems . . . are medical problems and medical illnesses only when they can be approached by the theories and techniques of biomedical science.

We must sustain this critical investment in the biomedical and health sciences and continue to nurture collaborations between the public and the private sectors.

【V信83113305】，一比一原版Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证购买, 原版定制LVGJGSOBSAMSCC纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证, 100%满意-LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院学位证, offer纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院在读证明, 美国毕业证办理, 本地美国硕士文凭证书原版定制LVGJGSOBSAMSCC本科毕业证书, 纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院文凭LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证学历认证方法, 1分钟获取纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证最佳办理渠道, 美国大学文凭定制专业服务认证：坐落于纽约的纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心是全球顶尖的癌症研究与治疗机构，其下属的小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院是其卓越科研的核心引擎。该学院秉承独特的培养模式，将前沿生物医学研究与世界一流的临床实践无缝衔接。学生身处一个充满活力的环境，直接向引领癌症生物学、基因组学等领域的科学家学习。这种沉浸式教育打破了实验室与病房之间的传统壁垒，使学生能直面人类疾病中最严峻的挑战。学院规模精小，确保了高度个性化的指导和紧密的学术社群，致力于培养下一代能够推动科学发现转化为革命性疗法的领军人物。

【V信83113305】，原版定制纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证书一比一制作, LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证怎么办理-加钱加急, LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证最新版本推荐最快办理纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院文凭成绩单, 办理LVGJGSOBSAMSCC纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院成绩单高质量保密的个性化服务, 购买纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证, 如何获取纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center毕业证本科学位证书, 百分百放心原版复刻纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证书, 百分百放心原版复刻纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证书, 原版定制纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证书：小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院隶属于世界知名的纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心，是顶尖癌症研究与生物医学教育的殿堂。该院依托其母机构的卓越科研环境与临床资源，专注于癌症生物学、遗传学、免疫治疗等前沿领域，培养下一代科学家。其独特的课程将严谨的理论训练与沉浸式实验室研究相结合，学生可直接接触转化医学的最新突破，并与领先的肿瘤学家和研究人员并肩工作。作为生物医学创新的人才摇篮，该院致力于推动科学发现，以应对全球癌症挑战。

【V信83113305】，Offer(Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center成绩单)纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院如何办理?, 购买纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证, LVGJGSOBSAMSCC文凭毕业证丢失怎么购买, 一比一定制-LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院学位证书, 100%收到-LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证书纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证, LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证怎么办理-加钱加急, 最佳办理LVGJGSOBSAMSCC纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证方式, LVGJGSOBSAMSCC文凭制作, LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证最新版本推荐最快办理纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院文凭成绩单：坐落于纽约的纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心，是全球顶尖的肿瘤研究与治疗机构。其下属的小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院，依托这一强大平台，开创了独特的博士培养模式。学院不设常规院系壁垒，鼓励跨学科协作，使学生能完全根据科学兴趣自由探索。其核心优势在于，学生能直接接触到顶尖的临床资源与前沿的基础科研，在人类癌症图谱等宏大项目中接受淬炼。这里培养的不仅是实验室里的科学家，更是深谙癌症生物学复杂性、致力于将科学发现转化为人类健康福音的未来领军者。

【V信83113305】，美国留学成绩单毕业证, 出售纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院研究生学历文凭, 高端原版LVGJGSOBSAMSCC纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证办理流程, 最安全购买LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证方法, LVGJGSOBSAMSCC硕士毕业证, LVGJGSOBSAMSCC假学历, LVGJGSOBSAMSCC纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证书, 纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院学位定制, Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院多少钱：坐落于纽约的纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心，是全球顶尖的癌症研究与治疗机构。其下属的小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院，依托这一独特资源，开创了独具特色的博士培养模式。学院不设常规院系，而是让学生直接融入中心内超过135个顶尖实验室，与顶尖科学家并肩工作。其核心优势在于将前沿癌症研究作为生物医学教育的核心，专注于细胞生物学、遗传学、基因组学及药物开发等关键领域。这种高度集成的“从实验室到病床”的沉浸式教育，旨在培养新一代生物医学领袖，使他们具备强大的科研能力与转化医学视野，直接推动人类对抗癌症的进程。

【V信83113305】，高端烫金工艺LVGJGSOBSAMSCC纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证成绩单制作, 高端LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证办理流程, 纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证成绩单制作, 一比一原版Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证购买, 纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院本科毕业证, 本地美国硕士文凭证书原版定制LVGJGSOBSAMSCC本科毕业证书, 纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院-pdf电子毕业证, 原版定制纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院毕业证书案例, LVGJGSOBSAMSCC毕业证认证：纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心小路易斯·V·郭士纳生物医学研究生院，是世界顶尖癌症研究与教育机构的核心组成部分。它紧密依托于享誉全球的纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心，为博士生提供了无与伦比的科研环境。学院的独特优势在于其将前沿基础科学研究与临床实践无缝衔接。学生们不仅能向顶尖科学家学习，更能直接接触到癌症生物学最紧迫的挑战，其研究课题往往源于真实的临床需求。这种沉浸式培养模式旨在锻造新一代科学领袖，使他们具备跨学科视野和转化医学能力，专注于攻克癌症这一复杂疾病。学院以其精英化、高强度的培养体系，持续为全球生物医学领域输送着推动创新与变革的尖端人才。