Unique Car Quotes

We've searched our database for all the quotes and captions related to Unique Car. Here they are! All 100 of them:

“
Colin's skin was alive with the feeling of connection to everyone in that car and everyone not in it. And he was feeling not-unique in the very best possible way.
”
”
John Green (An Abundance of Katherines)
“
The second thing you have to do to be a writer is to keep on writing. Don't listen to people who tell you that very few people get published and you won't be one of them. Don't listen to your friend who says you are better that Tolkien and don't have to try any more. Keep writing, keep faith in the idea that you have unique stories to tell, and tell them. I meet far too many people who are going to be writers 'someday.' When they are out of high school, when they've finished college, after the wedding, when the kids are older, after I retire . . . That is such a trap You will never have any more free time than you do right now. So, whether you are 12 or 70, you should sit down today and start being a writer if that is what you want to do. You might have to write on a notebook while your kids are playing on the swings or write in your car on your coffee break. That's okay. I think we've all 'been there, done that.' It all starts with the writing.
”
”
Robin Hobb
“
But...surely you know where your nephew is going?' she asked, looking bewildered. 'Certainly we know,' said Vernon Dursley. 'He's off with some of your lot, isn't he? Right, Dudley, let's get in the car, you heard the man, we're in a hurry.' Again, Vernon Dursley marched as far as the front door, but Dudley did not follow. 'Off with some of our lot?' Hestia looked outraged. Harry had met the attitude before: witches and wizards seemed stunned that his closest living family took so little interest in the famous Harry Potter. 'It's fine,' Harry assured her. 'It doesn't matter, honestly.' 'Doesn't matter?' repeated Hestia, her voice rising ominously. 'Don't these people realise what you've been through? What danger you are in? The unique position you hold in the hearts of the anti-Voldemort movement? 'Er - no, they don't,' said Harry. 'They think I'm a waste of space, actually, but I'm used to -' 'I don't think you're a waste of space.' If Harry had not seen Dudley's lips move, he might not have believed it.
”
”
J.K. Rowling (Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Harry Potter, #7))
“
There is always a unique atmosphere in the car when you drive through the City with a dead body in the back.
”
”
Steen Langstrup (In The Shadow of Sadd)
“
My mental illness is not your mental illness. Even if we have the exact same diagnosis we will likely experience it in profoundly different ways. This book is my unique perspective on my personal path so far. It is not a textbook. If it were it would probably cost a lot more money and have significantly less profanity or stories about strangers sending you unexpected vaginas in the mail. As it is with all stories, fast cars, wild bears, mental illness, and even life, only one truth remains: your mileage may vary.
”
”
Jenny Lawson (Furiously Happy: A Funny Book About Horrible Things)
“
Even in the era of AIDS, sex raises no unique moral issues at all. Decisions about sex may involve considerations about honesty, concern for others, prudence, and so on, but there is nothing special about sex in this respect, for the same could be said of decisions about driving a car. (In fact, the moral issues raised by driving a car, both from an environmental and from a safety point of view, are much more serious than those raised by sex.)
”
”
Peter Singer
“
Le coucher de soleil, le printemps, le bleu de la mer, les Ă©toiles de la nuit, toutes ces choses que nous disons captivantes n’ont de magie que lorsqu’elles gravitent autour d’une femme, mon garçon
 Car la BeautĂ©, la vraie, l’ unique, la beautĂ© phare, la beautĂ© absolue, c ’est la femme. Le reste, tout le reste n ’est qu ’accessoires de charme.
”
”
Yasmina Khadra
“
In addition to conformity as a way to relieve the anxiety springing from separateness, another factor of contemporary life must be considered: the role of the work routine and the pleasure routine. Man becomes a 'nine to fiver', he is part of the labour force, or the bureaucratic force of clerks and managers. He has little initiative, his tasks are prescribed by the organisation of the work; there is even little difference between those high up on the ladder and those on the bottom. They all perform tasks prescribed by the whole structure of the organisation, at a prescribed speed, and in a prescribed manner. Even the feelings are prescribed: cheerfulness, tolerance, reliability, ambition, and an ability to get along with everybody without friction. Fun is routinised in similar, although not quite as drastic ways. Books are selected by the book clubs, movies by the film and theatre owners and the advertising slogans paid for by them; the rest is also uniform: the Sunday ride in the car, the television session, the card game, the social parties. From birth to death, from Monday to Monday, from morning to evening - all activities are routinised, and prefabricated. How should a man caught up in this net of routine not forget that he is a man, a unique individual, one who is given only this one chance of living, with hopes and disappointments, with sorrow and fear, with the longing for love and the dread of the nothing and separateness?
”
”
Erich Fromm (The Art of Loving)
“
You go into extinction by being obsessed about becoming something else and then travelling in the wrong car while your real self keeps waiting at the bus stop for your unfulfilled return!
”
”
Israelmore Ayivor (Shaping the dream)
“
The lead car is absolutely unique, except for the one behind it which is identical.
”
”
Murray Walker
“
Do you want any breakfast, Sam?” my mom asks. I never eat breakfast at home, but my mom still asks me every day—when she catches me before I duck out, anyway—and in that moment I realize how much I love the little everyday routines of my life: the fact that she always asks, the fact that I always say no because there’s a sesame bagel waiting for me in Lindsay’s car, the fact that we always listen to “No More Drama” as we pull into the parking lot. The fact that my mom always cooks spaghetti and meatballs on Sunday, and the fact that once a month my dad takes over the kitchen and makes his “special stew” which is just hot-dog pieces and baked beans and lots of extra ketchup and molasses, and I would never admit to liking it, but it’s actually one of my favorite meals. The details that are my life’s special pattern, like how in handwoven rugs what really makes them unique are the tiny flaws in the stitching, little gaps and jumps and stutters that can never be reproduced.
”
”
Lauren Oliver (Before I Fall)
“
books are a uniquely portable magic. I usually listen to one in the car (always unabridged; I think abridged audiobooks are the pits), and carry another wherever I go.
”
”
Stephen King (On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft)
“
It is an eccentric and uniquely human approach to resources: like plowing under your farmland to make way for more lawns, or compromising your air quality in exchange for an enormous car.
”
”
John Vaillant (The Golden Spruce: A True Story of Myth, Madness, and Greed)
“
So much rubbish; ... from heavy plant machinery, cars, vans, buses to plastic bottles, magazines, papers, tins, boxes, bags, clothes... ... it is how they have been collected here that is odd... everything neat, clean, ordered and possibly even categorised...
”
”
Trevor Alan Foris (The Octunnumi Fosbit Files Prologue)
“
Frankly, accepting the family's unique qualities has done wonders to help my own sanity.
”
”
Carly Philips (Summer Lovin')
“
There is nothing unique or special in a near-death experience. They are not rare; everyone, I would venture, has had them, at one time or another, perhaps without even realising it. The brush of a van too close to your bicycle, the tired medic who realises that a dosage ought to be checked one final time, the driver who has drunk too much and is reluctantly persuaded to relinquish the car keys, the train missed after sleeping through an alarm, the aeroplane not caught, the virus never inhaled, the assailant never encountered, the path not taken.
”
”
Maggie O'Farrell (I Am, I Am, I Am: Seventeen Brushes With Death)
“
people today have less of an idea than ever before what a really living person is; in fact, human beings, each one of whom is a priceless, unique experiment of nature, are being shot to death in car-loads.
”
”
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
“
When Ronan was young and didn’t know any better, he thought everyone was like him. He made rules for humanity based upon observation, his idea of the truth only as broad as his world was. Everyone must sleep and eat. Everyone has hands, feet. Everyone’s skin is sensitive; no one’s hair is. Everyone whispers to hide and shouts to be heard. Everyone has pale skin and blue eyes, every man has long dark hair, every woman has long golden hair. Every child knows the stories of Irish heroes, every mother knows songs about weaver women and lonely boatmen. Every house is surrounded by secret fields and ancient barns, every pasture is watched by blue mountains, every narrow drive leads to a hidden world. Everyone sometimes wakes with their dreams still gripped in their hands. Then he crept out of childhood, and suddenly the uniqueness of experience unveiled itself. Not all fathers are wild, charming schemers, wiry, far-eyed gods; and not all mothers are dulcet, soft-spoken friends, patient as buds in spring. There are people who don’t care about cars and there are people who like to live in cities. Some families do not have older and younger brothers; some families don’t have brothers at all. Most men do not go to Mass every Sunday and most men do not fall in love with other men. And no one brings dreams to life. No one brings dreams to life. No one brings dreams to life.
”
”
Maggie Stiefvater (Call Down the Hawk (Dreamer Trilogy, #1))
“
Dieu c'est l'essence mĂȘme, tandis qu'Édouard n'a jamais rien trouvĂ© d'essentiel ni dans ses amours, ni dans son mĂ©tier, ni dans ses idĂ©es. Il est trop honnĂȘte pour admettre qu'il trouve l'essentiel dans l'inessentiel, mais il est trop faible pour ne pas dĂ©sirer secrĂštement l'essentiel. Ah, mesdames et messieurs, comme il est triste de vivre quand on ne peut rein prendre au sĂ©rieux, rien ni personne ! C'est pourquoi Edouard Ă©prouve le dĂ©sir de Dieu, car seul Dieu est dispensĂ© de l'obligation de paraĂźtre et peut se contenter d'ĂȘtre ; car lui seul constitue (lui seul, unique et non existant) l'antithĂšse essentielle de ce monde d'autant plus existant qu'il est inessentiel.
”
”
Milan Kundera (Laughable Loves)
“
L'homme lutte contre la peur mais, contrairement Ă  ce qu'on rĂ©pĂšte toujours, cette peur n'est pas celle de la mort, car la peur de la mort, tout le monde ne l'Ă©prouve pas, certains n'ayant aucune imagination, d'autres se croyant immortels, d'autres encore espĂ©rant des rencontres merveilleuses aprĂšs leur trĂ©pas ; la seule peur universelle, la peur unique, celle qui conduit toutes nos pensĂ©es, car la peur de n'ĂȘtre rien. Parce que chaque individu a Ă©prouvĂ© ceci, ne fĂ»t-ce qu'une seconde au cours d'une journĂ©e : se rendre compte que, par nature, ne lui appartient aucune des identitĂ©s qui le dĂ©finissent, qu'il aurait pu ne pas ĂȘtre dotĂ© de ce qui le caractĂ©rise, qu'il s'en est fallu d'un cheveu qu'il naisse ailleurs, apprenne une autre langue, reçoive une Ă©ducation religieuse diffĂ©rente, qu'on l'Ă©lĂšve dans une autre culture, qu'on l'instruise dans une autre idĂ©ologie, avec d'autres parents, d'autres tuteurs, d'autres modĂšles. Vertige !
”
”
Éric-Emmanuel Schmitt
“
Le livre, comme livre, appartient Ă  l'auteur, mais comme pensĂ©e, il appartient -le mot n'est pas trop vaste- au genre humain. Toutes les intelligences y ont droit. Si l'un des deux droits, le droit de l'Ă©crivain et le droit de l'esprit humain, devait ĂȘtre sacrifiĂ©, ce serait, certes, le droit de l'Ă©crivain, car l'intĂ©rĂȘt public est notre prĂ©occupation unique, et tous, je le dĂ©clare, doivent passer avant nous.
”
”
Victor Hugo
“
You hear it in every political speech, “vote for me, we’ll get the dream back.” They all reiterate it in similar words—you even hear it from people who are destroying the dream, whether they know it or not. But the “dream” has to be sustained, otherwise how are you going to get people in the richest, most powerful country in world history, with extraordinary advantages, to face the reality that they see around them? Inequality is really unprecedented. If you look at total inequality today, it’s like the worst periods of American history. But if you refine it more closely, the inequality comes from the extreme wealth in a tiny sector of the population, a fraction of 1 percent. There were periods like the Gilded Age in the 1890s and the Roaring Twenties and so on, when a situation developed rather similar to this, but the current period is extreme. Because if you look at the wealth distribution, the inequality mostly comes from super-wealth—literally, the top one-tenth of a percent are just super-wealthy. This is the result of over thirty years of a shift in social and economic policy. If you check you find that over the course of these years the government policy has been modified completely against the will of the population to provide enormous benefits to the very rich. And for most of the population, the majority, real incomes have almost stagnated for over thirty years. The middle class in that sense, that unique American sense, is under severe attack. A significant part of the American Dream is class mobility: You’re born poor, you work hard, you get rich. The idea that it is possible for everyone to get a decent job, buy a home, get a car, have their children go to school . . . It’s all collapsed.
”
”
Noam Chomsky (Requiem for the American Dream: The 10 Principles of Concentration of Wealth & Power)
“
Does everyone from England go to sleep the minute you load them into a car, or is that something that’s uniquely you?
”
”
Mira Grant (How Green This Land, How Blue This Sea (Newsflesh, #3.2))
“
Cette petite religion possÚde un caractÚre unique : les deux membres du couple en incarnent tous les deux l'idéal. Le droit de propriété sur le corps de son partenaire, protégé par une défense rituelle trÚs forte, se place au centre de cette mini-religion. Car n'importe quel type d'écart sexuel hors du couple fait naßtre chez l'autre un intense sentiment de colÚre.
”
”
Liv Strömquist (Prins Charles kÀnsla)
“
Ireland, like Ukraine, is a largely rural country which suffers from its proximity to a more powerful industrialised neighbour. Ireland’s contribution to the history of tractors is the genius engineer Harry Ferguson, who was born in 1884, near Belfast. Ferguson was a clever and mischievous man, who also had a passion for aviation. It is said that he was the first man in Great Britain to build and fly his own aircraft in 1909. But he soon came to believe that improving efficiency of food production would be his unique service to mankind. Harry Ferguson’s first two-furrow plough was attached to the chassis of the Ford Model T car converted into a tractor, aptly named Eros. This plough was mounted on the rear of the tractor, and through ingenious use of balance springs it could be raised or lowered by the driver using a lever beside his seat. Ford, meanwhile, was developing its own tractors. The Ferguson design was more advanced, and made use of hydraulic linkage, but Ferguson knew that despite his engineering genius, he could not achieve his dream on his own. He needed a larger company to produce his design. So he made an informal agreement with Henry Ford, sealed only by a handshake. This Ford-Ferguson partnership gave to the world a new type of Fordson tractor far superior to any that had been known before, and the precursor of all modern-type tractors. However, this agreement by a handshake collapsed in 1947 when Henry Ford II took over the empire of his father, and started to produce a new Ford 8N tractor, using the Ferguson system. Ferguson’s open and cheerful nature was no match for the ruthless mentality of the American businessman. The matter was decided in court in 1951. Ferguson claimed $240 million, but was awarded only $9.25 million. Undaunted in spirit, Ferguson had a new idea. He approached the Standard Motor Company at Coventry with a plan, to adapt the Vanguard car for use as tractor. But this design had to be modified, because petrol was still rationed in the post-war period. The biggest challenge for Ferguson was the move from petrol-driven to diesel-driven engines and his success gave rise to the famous TE-20, of which more than half a million were built in the UK. Ferguson will be remembered for bringing together two great engineering stories of our time, the tractor and the family car, agriculture and transport, both of which have contributed so richly to the well-being of mankind.
”
”
Marina Lewycka (A Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian)
“
J'ai toujours pris un plaisir extrĂȘme Ă  penser, sans trop me soucier du tracĂ© de la frontiĂšre entre l'imagination et la certitude. L'intĂ©rieur de ma tĂȘte comme un bordel dont je serai l'unique client d'un soir, l'habituĂ© occasionnel. Pas si seul, car les pensĂ©es pensionnaires viennent au-devant de mes dĂ©sirs : les nobles, cendrĂ©es et hautaines, les belles, toutes nues mais poudrĂ©es, les ingĂ©nues, les petites, les perverses, les noires, les folles, les honteuses. Et les vulgaires, et les trĂšs vulgaires, champagne, Ă©chancrure et langues qui s'agitent. "Mes pensĂ©es ce sont mes catins", comme c'est exact. Luxure mentale. Dehors, le froid. Et les autres, tous les autres, se tiennent dans ce froid. Proches et lointains. Et je les regarde, jumelles, fenĂȘtres sur cou. Nous communiquons par interphones et rĂ©pondeurs.
”
”
Pierre PĂ©ju (La Vie courante)
“
It has occurred to me that I should try and view in a similar spirit something which, over these three weeks I have been here in Shanghai, has come to be a perennial source of irritation: namely, the way people here seem determined at every opportunity to block one’s view. No sooner has one entered a room or stepped out from a car than someone or other will have smilingly placed himself right within one’s line of vision, preventing the most basic perusal of one’s surroundings. Often as not, the offending person is one’s very host or guide of that moment; but should there be any lapse in this quarter, there is never a shortage of bystanders eager to make good the shortcoming. As far as I can ascertain, all the national groups that make up the community here—English, Chinese, French, American, Japanese, Russian—subscribe to this practice with equal zeal, and the inescapable conclusion is that this custom is one that has grown up uniquely here within Shanghai’s International Settlement, cutting across all barriers of race and class.
”
”
Kazuo Ishiguro (When We Were Orphans)
“
Bien entendu, cette fidelitĂ© aux impressions premiĂšres, et purement physiques, retrouvĂ©es Ă  chaque fois auprĂšs de mes amies, ne concernait pas que les traits de leur visage puisque on a vu que j'Ă©tais aussi sensible Ă  leur voix, plus troublante peut-ĂȘtre, (car elle n'offre pas seulement les mĂȘmes surfaces singuliĂšres et sensuelles que lui, elle fait partie de l'abĂźme inaccessible qui donne le vertige des baisers sans espoir) leur voix pareille au son unique d'un petit instrument oĂč chacune se mettait tout entiĂšre et qui n'Ă©tait qu'Ă  elle.
”
”
Marcel Proust (In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower)
“
Traffic on Wisconsin Avenue wasn’t too bad, but he hit his first snag of the day when he found Pennsylvania to be mired in gridlock. While he crept forward he sang along with his Blaupunkt stereo. Neil Young’s On the Beach was a 1974 release that would have been a unique listening choice for most thirty-two-year-olds, but Ross had grown up with it. Revolution music, his mother used to call it, although Ethan realized there was a certain dissonance to the concept of singing along with antiestablishment songs while driving his luxury car on his way to his government job.
”
”
Mark Greaney (Tom Clancy Support and Defend)
“
Simply put, within AS, there is a wide range of function. In truth, many AS people will never receive a diagnosis. They will continue to live with other labels or no label at all. At their best, they will be the eccentrics who wow us with their unusual habits and stream-of-consciousness creativity, the inventors who give us wonderfully unique gadgets that whiz and whirl and make our life surprisingly more manageable, the geniuses who discover new mathematical equations, the great musicians and writers and artists who enliven our lives. At their most neutral, they will be the loners who never now quite how to greet us, the aloof who aren't sure they want to greet us, the collectors who know everyone at the flea market by name and date of birth, the non-conformists who cover their cars in bumper stickers, a few of the professors everyone has in college. At their most noticeable, they will be the lost souls who invade our personal space, the regulars at every diner who carry on complete conversations with the group ten tables away, the people who sound suspiciously like robots, the characters who insist they wear the same socks and eat the same breakfast day in and day out, the people who never quite find their way but never quite lose it either.
”
”
Liane Holliday Willey (Pretending to be Normal: Living with Asperger's Syndrome (Autism Spectrum Disorder) Expanded Edition)
“
calmer and more content when being worn14 than when they are left alone, though there is always that unique baby who likes his or her own space. Babywearing, as with all other options for parenting gently, needs to be adapted to suit a little one’s own personality and needs. Some high-needs babies may do better taking naps during the day while being worn, giving mama a hands-free break while still meeting her baby’s needs. Other babies do well being worn after nursing to aid in digestion, reducing gassiness and the incidence of reflux.22 Babywearing also aids in hip health when using a properly designed carrier. The International Hip Dysplasia Institute has warned against excessive amounts of time in car seats, walkers, swings, and other devices that keep babies’ legs extended and pushed together. Their recommendation is for a baby’s legs to be in the ‘frog’ position, with their thighs supported and their knees bent.23 This is the positioning you should look for when shopping for a carrier to wear your little one. (Two Thousand Kisses a Day: Gentle Parenting Through the Ages and Stages) Wearing your baby against your heart, where the slightest tilt of your head brings your smile into focus for your tiny one, is not only one of the most beautiful and bonding experiences
”
”
L.R. Knost (Jesus, the Gentle Parent: Gentle Christian Parenting (Little Hearts Handbooks))
“
[A propos du faux Ă©volutionnisme] Il s'agit d'une tentative pour supprimer la diversitĂ© des cultures tout en feignant de la reconnaĂźtre pleinement. Car, si l'on traite les diffĂ©rents Ă©tats oĂč se trouvent les sociĂ©tĂ©s humaines, tant anciennes que lointaines, comme des stades ou des Ă©tapes d'un dĂ©veloppement unique qui, partant du mĂȘme point, doit les faire converger vers le mĂȘme but, on voit bien que la diversitĂ© n'est plus qu'apparente. L'humanitĂ© devient une et identique Ă  elle-mĂȘme ; seulement, cette unitĂ© et cette identitĂ© ne peuvent se rĂ©aliser que progressivement et la variĂ©tĂ© des cultures illustre les moments d'un processus qui dissimule une rĂ©alitĂ© plus profonde ou en retarde la manifestation.
”
”
Claude LĂ©vi-Strauss (Race et histoire)
“
Now come on, we’re off.” He marched out of the room. They heard the front door open, but Dudley did not move and after a few faltering steps Aunt Petunia stopped too. “What now?” barked Uncle Vernon, reappearing in the doorway. It seemed that Dudley was struggling with concepts too difficult to put into words. After several moments of apparently painful internal struggle he said, “But where’s he going to go?” Aunt Petunia and Uncle Vernon looked at each other. It was clear that Dudley was frightening them. Hestia Jones broke the silence. “But
surely you know where your nephew is going?” she asked, looking bewildered. “Certainly we know,” said Vernon Dursley. “He’s off with some of your lot, isn’t he? Right, Dudley, let’s get in the car, you heard the man, we’re in a hurry.” Again, Vernon Dursley marched as far as the front door, but Dudley did not follow. “Off with some of our lot?” Hestia looked outraged. Harry had met this attitude before: Witches and wizards seemed stunned that his closest living relatives took so little interest in the famous Harry Potter. “It’s fine,” Harry assured her. “It doesn’t matter, honestly.” “Doesn’t matter?” repeated Hestia, her voice rising ominously. “Don’t these people realize what you’ve been through? What danger you are in? The unique position you hold in the hearts of the anti-Voldemort movement?” “Er--no, they don’t,” said Harry. “They think I’m a waste of space, actually, but I’m used to--” “I don’t think you’re a waste of space.” If Harry had not seen Dudley’s lips move, he might not have believed it. As it was, he stared at Dudley for several seconds before accepting that it must have been his cousin who had spoken; for one thing, Dudley had turned red. Harry was embarrassed and astonished himself. “Well
er
thanks, Dudley.” Again, Dudley appeared to grapple with thoughts too unwieldy for expression before mumbling, “You saved my life.” “Not really,” said Harry. “It was your soul the dementor would have taken
” He looked curiously at his cousin. They had had virtually no contact during this summer or last, as Harry had come back to Privet Drive so briefly and kept to his room so much. It now dawned on Harry, however, that the cup of cold tea on which he had trodden that morning might not have been a booby trap at all. Although rather touched, he was nevertheless quite relieved that Dudley appeared to have exhausted his ability to express his feelings. After opening his mouth once or twice more, Dudley subsided into scarlet-faced silence. Aunt Petunia burst into tears. Hestia Jones gave her an approving look that changed to outrage as Aunt Petunia ran forward and embraced Dudley rather than Harry. “S-so sweet, Dudders
” she sobbed into his massive chest. “S-such a lovely b-boy
s-saying thank you
” “But he hasn’t said thank you at all!” said Hestia indignantly. “He only said he didn’t think Harry was a waste of space!” “Yeah, but coming from Dudley that’s like ‘I love you,’” said Harry, torn between annoyance and a desire to laugh as Aunt Petunia continued to clutch at Dudley as if he had just saved Harry from a burning building.
”
”
J.K. Rowling (Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Harry Potter, #7))
“
Calmly We Walk Through This April Day Calmly we walk through this April's day, Metropolitan poetry here and there, In the park sit pauper and rentier, The screaming children, the motor-car Fugitive about us, running away, Between the worker and the millionaire Number provides all distances, It is Nineteen Thirty-Seven now, Many great dears are taken away, What will become of you and me (This is the school in which we learn...) Besides the photo and the memory? (...that time is the fire in which we burn.) (This is the school in which we learn...) What is the self amid this blaze? What am I now that I was then Which I shall suffer and act again, The theodicy I wrote in my high school days Restored all life from infancy, The children shouting are bright as they run (This is the school in which they learn . . .) Ravished entirely in their passing play! (...that time is the fire in which they burn.) Avid its rush, that reeling blaze! Where is my father and Eleanor? Not where are they now, dead seven years, But what they were then? No more? No more? From Nineteen-Fourteen to the present day, Bert Spira and Rhoda consume, consume Not where they are now (where are they now?) But what they were then, both beautiful; Each minute bursts in the burning room, The great globe reels in the solar fire, Spinning the trivial and unique away. (How all things flash! How all things flare!) What am I now that I was then? May memory restore again and again The smallest color of the smallest day: Time is the school in which we learn, Time is the fire in which we burn.
”
”
Delmore Schwartz
“
Grief, like death, is banal and unique. So, a banal comparison. When you change your make of car, you suddenly notice how many other cars of the same sort there are on the road. They register in a way they never did before. When you are widowed, you suddenly notice all the widows and widowers coming towards you. Before, they had been more or less invisible, and they continue to remain so to the other drivers, to the unwidowed.
”
”
Julian Barnes
“
Relations among women on the Upper East Side are charged as they are perhaps nowhere else in the country or the world, and handbags, like cars, just might serve a lot of different functions all at once. A communication about where one stands in the inevitable hierarchy of Manhattan, a barometer of your wealth and connectedness and clout in a city where money and connections and clout are everything. A fashion statement. A security blanket, a way of self-soothing in a uniquely stressful town.
”
”
Wednesday Martin (Primates of Park Avenue)
“
Do you want any breakfast, Sam?” my mom asks. I never eat breakfast at home, but my mom still asks me every day—when she catches me before I duck out, anyway—and in that moment I realize how much I love the little everyday routines of my life: the fact that she always asks, the fact that I always say no because there’s a sesame bagel waiting for me in Lindsay’s car, the fact that we always listen to “No More Drama” as we pull into the parking lot. The fact that my mom always cooks spaghetti and meatballs on Sunday, and the fact that once a month my dad takes over the kitchen and makes his “special stew,” which is just hot-dog pieces and baked beans and lots of extra ketchup and molasses, and I would never admit to liking it, but it’s actually one of my favorite meals. The details that are my life’s special pattern, like how in handwoven rugs what really makes them unique are the tiny flaws in the stitching, little gaps and jumps and stutters that can never be reproduced. So many things become beautiful when you really look.
”
”
Lauren Oliver (Before I Fall)
“
Esther n'Ă©tait certainement pas bien Ă©duquĂ©e au sens habituel du terme, jamais l'idĂ©e ne lui serait venue de vider un cendrier ou de dĂ©barrasser le relief de ses repas, et c'est sans la moindre gĂȘne qu'elle laissait la lumiĂšre allumĂ©e derriĂšre elle dans les piĂšces qu'elle venait de quitter (il m'est arrivĂ©, suivant pas Ă  pas son parcours dans ma rĂ©sidence de San Jose, d'avoir Ă  actionner dix-sept commutateurs); il n'Ă©tait pas davantage question de lui demander de penser Ă  faire un achat, de ramener d'un magasin oĂč elle se rendait une course non destinĂ©e Ă  son propre usage, ou plus gĂ©nĂ©ralement de rendre un service quelconque. Comme toutes les trĂšs jolies jeunes filles elle n'Ă©tait au fond bonne qu'Ă  baiser, et il aurait Ă©tĂ© stupide de l'employer Ă  autre chose, de la voir autrement que comme un animal de luxe, en tout choyĂ© et gĂ„tĂ©, protĂ©gĂ© de tout souci comme de toute tĂąche ennuyeuse ou pĂ©nible afin de mieux pouvoir se consacrer Ă  son service exclusivement sexuel. Elle n'en Ă©tait pas moins trĂšs loin d'ĂȘtre ce monstre d'arrogance, d'Ă©goĂŻsme absolu et froid, au, pour parler en termes plus baudelairiens, cette infernale petite salope que sont la plupart des trĂšs jolies jeunes filles; il y avait en elle la conscience de la maladie, de la faiblesse et de la mort. Quoique belle, trĂšs belle, infiniment Ă©rotique et dĂ©sirable, Esther n'en Ă©tait pas moins sensible aux infirmitĂ©s animales, parce qu'elle les connaissait ; c'est ce soir-lĂ  que j'en pris conscience, et que je me mis vĂ©ritablement Ă  l'aimer. Le dĂ©sir physique, si violent soit-il, n'avait jamais suffi chez moi Ă  conduire Ă  l'amour, il n'avait pu atteindre ce stade ultime que lorsqu'il s'accompagnait, par une juxtaposition Ă©trange, d'une compassion pour l'ĂȘtre dĂ©sirĂ© ; tout ĂȘtre vivant, Ă©videmment, mĂ©rite la compassion du simple fait qu'il est en vie et se trouve par lĂ -mĂȘme exposĂ© Ă  des souffrances sans nombre, mais face Ă  un ĂȘtre jeune et en pleine santĂ© c'est une considĂ©ration qui paraĂźt bien thĂ©orique. Par sa maladie de reins, par sa faiblesse physique insoupçonnable mais rĂ©elle, Esther pouvait susciter en moi une compassion non feinte, chaque fois que l'envie me prendrait d'Ă©prouver ce sentiment Ă  son Ă©gard. Étant elle-mĂȘme compatissante, ayant mĂȘme des aspirations occasionnelles Ă  la bontĂ©, elle pouvait Ă©galement susciter en moi l'estime, ce qui parachevait l'Ă©difice, car je n'Ă©tais pas un ĂȘtre de passion, pas essentiellement, et si je pouvais dĂ©sirer quelqu'un de parfaitement mĂ©prisable, s'il m'Ă©tait arrivĂ© Ă  plusieurs reprises de baiser des filles dans l'unique but d'assurer mon emprise sur elles et au fond de les dominer, si j'Ă©tais mĂȘme allĂ© jusqu'Ă  utiliser ce peu louable sentiment dans des sketches, jusqu'Ă  manifester une comprĂ©hension troublante pour ces violeurs qui sacrifient leur victime immĂ©diatement aprĂšs avoir disposĂ© de son corps, j'avais par contre toujours eu besoin d'estimer pour aimer, jamais au fond je ne m'Ă©tais senti parfaitement Ă  l'aise dans une relation sexuelle basĂ©e sur la pure attirance Ă©rotique et l'indiffĂ©rence Ă  l'autre, j'avais toujours eu besoin, pour me sentir sexuellement heureux, d'un minimum - Ă  dĂ©faut d'amour - de sympathie, d'estime, de comprĂ©hension mutuelle; l'humanitĂ© non, je n'y avais pas renoncĂ©. (La possibilitĂ© d'une Ăźle, Daniel 1,15)
”
”
Michel Houellebecq
“
«Regardez, regardez, continua le comte en saisissant chacun des deux jeunes gens par la main, regardez, car, sur mon Ăąme, c'est curieux, voilĂ  un homme qui Ă©tait rĂ©signĂ© Ă  son sort, qui marchait Ă  l'Ă©chafaud, qui allait mourir comme un lĂąche, c'est vrai, mais enfin il allait mourir sans rĂ©sistance et sans rĂ©crimination: savez-vous ce qui lui donnait quelque force? savez-vous ce qui le consolait? savez-vous ce qui lui faisait prendre son supplice en patience? c'est qu'un autre partageait son angoisse; c'est qu'un autre allait mourir comme lui; c'est qu'un autre allait mourir avant lui! Menez deux moutons Ă  la boucherie, deux bƓufs Ă  l'abattoir, et faites comprendre Ă  l'un d'eux que son compagnon ne mourra pas, le mouton bĂȘlera de joie, le bƓuf mugira de plaisir mais l'homme, l'homme que Dieu a fait Ă  son image, l'homme Ă  qui Dieu a imposĂ© pour premiĂšre, pour unique, pour suprĂȘme loi, l'amour de son prochain, l'homme Ă  qui Dieu a donnĂ© une voix pour exprimer sa pensĂ©e, quel sera son premier cri quand il apprendra que son camarade est sauvĂ©? un blasphĂšme. Honneur Ă  l'homme, ce chef-d'Ɠuvre de la nature, ce roi de la crĂ©ation!»
”
”
Alexandre Dumas (Le Comte de Monte-Cristo, Tome II (The Count of Monte Cristo, part 2 of 4))
“
Paint me a small railroad station then, ten minutes before dark. Beyond the platform are the waters of the Wekonsett River, reflecting a somber afterglow. The architecture of the station is oddly informal, gloomy but unserious, and mostly resembles a pergola, cottage or summer house although this is a climate of harsh winters. The lamps along the platform burn with a nearly palpable plaintiveness. The setting seems in some way to be at the heart of the matter. We travel by plane, oftener than not, and yet the spirit of our country seems to have remained a country of railroads. You wake in a pullman bedroom at three a.m. in a city the name of which you do not know and may never discover. A man stands on the platform with a child on his shoulders. They are waving goodbye to some traveler, but what is the child doing up so late and why is the man crying? On a siding beside the platform there is a lighted dining car where a waiter sits alone at a table, adding up his accounts. Beyond this is a water tower and beyond this a well-lighted and empty street. Then you think happily that this is your country - unique, mysterious and vast.
”
”
John Cheever (Bullet Park (Spanish Edition))
“
But that California trip was just a flash in the eye of that year. The rest of the time, I hung in purgatory, playing talent shows and showcases here and there, living like a normal teenager in Philadelphia. Or maybe I should say living like a normal black teenager, which meant that aimlessness was accompanied by a certain unique set of risks. One night, I was out driving with a few friends of mine when the police pulled us over. We were told we fit the description of someone who had committed a robbery or stolen a car, though I don’t really know what kind of description that could have been: three black kids in a Hyundai blasting U2’s Joshua Tree on their way back from Bible study? The officer actually drew a gun. I was terrified. The worst part of all was that when I saw the police in the rearview mirror, I started thinking that maybe I had stolen the car. I don’t know what the psychological phenomenon is called, exactly, but when you encircle someone with suspicion, the idea of guilt just starts to appear within them. It was a terrible feeling and it’s a terrible process, and it was another reminder that the life I was leading, while superficially uneventful, had the potential to turn against me at any moment.
”
”
Ahmir "Questlove" Thompson (Mo' Meta Blues: The World According to Questlove)
“
Les États-Unis, c'est l'utopia rĂ©alisĂ©e. If ne faut pas juger de leur crise comme de la nĂŽtre [...] La leur est celle de l'utopie rĂ©alisĂ©e confrontĂ©e Ă  sa durĂ©e et Ă  sa permanence. La conviction idyllique des AmĂ©ricains d'ĂȘtre le centre du monde, la puissance suprĂȘme et le modĂšle absolu n'est pas fausse [...] [Elle] s'institue sur l'idĂ©e qu'elle est la rĂ©alisation de tout ce dont les autres ont rĂȘvĂ© - justice, abondance, droit, richesse, libertĂ©: elle le sait, elle y croit, et finalement les autres y croient aussi. [...] [La colonisation] reprĂ©sente pour le Vieux Monde l'expĂ©rience unique d'une commutation idĂ©alisĂ©e des valeurs, presque comme dans un roman de science-fiction (dont elle garde souvent la tonalitĂ©, comme aux USA) [...] C'est ce qui, quoi qu'il arrive, nous sĂ©pare des AmĂ©ricains. Nous ne les rattrapons jamais, et nous n'aurons jamais cette candeur. [...] Il nous manque l'Ăąme et l'audace de ce qu'on pourrait appeler le degrĂ© zĂ©ro d'une culture, la puissance de l'inculture [...], tout comme la Weltanschauung transcendantale et historique de l'Europe Ă©chappera toujours aux AmĂ©ricains. Pas plus que les pays du Tiers Monde n'intĂ©rioriseront jamais les valeurs de dĂ©mocratie et de progrĂšs technologique [...]. Nous vivons dans la nĂ©gativitĂ© et la contradiction, eux vivent dans le paradoxe (car c'est une idĂ©e paradoxale que celle d'une utopie rĂ©alisĂ©e). [...] Le charme et la puissance de l'(in)culture amĂ©ricaine viennent justement de la matĂ©rialisation soudaine et sans prĂ©cĂ©dents des modĂšles.
”
”
Jean Baudrillard (America)
“
de demander l’aumĂŽne. Les vrais pauvres mĂ©ritant assistance et compassion Ă©taient uniquement ceux qui, trop ĂągĂ©s ou malades, ne pouvaient plus subvenir Ă  leurs besoins en travaillant de leurs propres mains. Tous les autres devaient travailler et s’ils souffraient de la faim parce qu’ils ne faisaient rien, tant pis pour eux. A ce moment-lĂ  passa dans la rue un homme transpirant et haletant qui tirait Ă  grand peine deux charrettes de charbon. Pinocchio, jugeant sa physionomie avenante, l’accosta et lui demanda d’une petite voix tout en baissant les yeux : – Me feriez-vous la charitĂ© d’un petit sou, car je meurs de faim ? – Ce n’est pas un mais quatre sous que je te donnerai – rĂ©pondit le charbonnier – si tu m’aides Ă  tirer ces charrettes jusque chez moi.
”
”
Carlo Collodi (Les aventures de Pinocchio (French Edition))
“
My editor insists that I clarify that there isn’t actually a $25 bill hidden in this book, which is sort of ridiculous to have to explain, because there’s no such thing as a $25 bill. If you bought this book thinking you were going to find a $25 bill inside then I think you really just paid for a worthwhile lesson, and that lesson is, don’t sell your cow for magic beans. There was another book that explained this same concept many years ago, but I think my cribbed example is much more exciting. It’s like the Fifty Shades of Grey version of “Jack and the Beanstalk.” But with fewer anal beads, or beanstalks. 2. “Concoctulary” is a word that I just made up for words that you have to invent because they didn’t yet exist. It’s a portmanteau of “concocted” and “vocabulary.” I was going to call it an “imaginary” (as a portmanteau of “imagined” and “dictionary”) but turns out that the word “imaginary” was already concoctularied, which is actually fine because “concoctulary” sounds sort of unintentionally dirty and is also great fun to say. Try it for yourself. Con-COC-chew-lary. It sings. 3. My mental illness is not your mental illness. Even if we have the exact same diagnosis we will likely experience it in profoundly different ways. This book is my unique perspective on my personal path so far. It is not a textbook. If it were it would probably cost a lot more money and have significantly less profanity or stories about strangers sending you unexpected vaginas in the mail. As it is with all stories, fast cars, wild bears, mental illness, and even life, only one truth remains: your mileage may vary.
”
”
Jenny Lawson (Furiously Happy: A Funny Book About Horrible Things)
“
Sans doute, l’amitiĂ©, l’amitiĂ© qui a Ă©gard aux individus, est une chose frivole, et la lecture est une amitiĂ©. Mais du moins c’est une amitiĂ© sincĂšre, et le fait qu’elle s’adresse Ă  un mort, Ă  un absent, lui donne quelque chose de dĂ©sintĂ©ressĂ©, de presque touchant. C’est de plus une amitiĂ© dĂ©barrassĂ©e de tout ce qui fait la laideur des autres. Comme nous ne sommes tous, nous les vivants, que des morts qui ne sont pas encore entrĂ©s en fonctions, toutes ces politesses, toutes ces salutations dans le vestibule que nous appelons dĂ©fĂ©rence, gratitude, dĂ©vouement et oĂč nous mĂȘlons tant de mensonges, sont stĂ©riles et fatigantes. De plus, – dĂšs les premiĂšres relations de sympathie, d’admiration, de reconnaissance, – les premiĂšres paroles que nous prononçons, les premiĂšres lettres que nous Ă©crivons, tissent autour de nous les premiers fils d’une toile d’habitudes, d’une vĂ©ritable maniĂšre d’ĂȘtre, dont nous ne pouvons plus nous dĂ©barrasser dans les amitiĂ©s suivantes ; sans compter que pendant ce temps-lĂ  les paroles excessives que nous avons prononcĂ©es restent comme des lettres de change que nous devons payer, ou que nous paierons plus cher encore toute notre vie des remords de les avoir laissĂ© protester. Dans la lecture, l’amitiĂ© est soudain ramenĂ©e Ă  sa puretĂ© premiĂšre. Avec les livres, pas d’amabilitĂ©. Ces amis-lĂ , si nous passons la soirĂ©e avec eux, c’est vraiment que nous en avons envie. Eux, du moins, nous ne les quittons souvent qu’à regret. Et quand nous les avons quittĂ©s, aucune de ces pensĂ©es qui gĂątent l’amitiĂ© : Qu’ont-ils pensĂ© de nous ? – N’avons-nous pas manquĂ© de tact ? – Avons-nous plu ? – et la peur d’ĂȘtre oubliĂ© pour tel autre. Toutes ces agitations de l’amitiĂ© expirent au seuil de cette amitiĂ© pure et calme qu’est la lecture. Pas de dĂ©fĂ©rence non plus ; nous ne rions de ce que dit MoliĂšre que dans la mesure exacte oĂč nous le trouvons drĂŽle ; quand il nous ennuie nous n’avons pas peur d’avoir l’air ennuyĂ©, et quand nous avons dĂ©cidĂ©ment assez d’ĂȘtre avec lui, nous le remettons Ă  sa place aussi brusquement que s’il n’avait ni gĂ©nie ni cĂ©lĂ©britĂ©. L’atmosphĂšre de cette pure amitiĂ© est le silence, plus pur que la parole. Car nous parlons pour les autres, mais nous nous taisons pour nous-mĂȘmes. Aussi le silence ne porte pas, comme la parole, la trace de nos dĂ©fauts, de nos grimaces. Il est pur, il est vraiment une atmosphĂšre. Entre la pensĂ©e de l’auteur et la nĂŽtre il n’interpose pas ces Ă©lĂ©ments irrĂ©ductibles, rĂ©fractaires Ă  la pensĂ©e, de nos Ă©goĂŻsmes diffĂ©rents. Le langage mĂȘme du livre est pur (si le livre mĂ©rite ce nom), rendu transparent par la pensĂ©e de l’auteur qui en a retirĂ© tout ce qui n’était pas elle-mĂȘme jusqu’à le rendre son image fidĂšle, chaque phrase, au fond, ressemblant aux autres, car toutes sont dites par l’inflexion unique d’une personnalitĂ© ; de lĂ  une sorte de continuitĂ©, que les rapports de la vie et ce qu’ils mĂȘlent Ă  la pensĂ©e d’élĂ©ments qui lui sont Ă©trangers excluent et qui permet trĂšs vite de suivre la ligne mĂȘme de la pensĂ©e de l’auteur, les traits de sa physionomie qui se reflĂštent dans ce calme miroir. Nous savons nous plaire tour Ă  tour aux traits de chacun sans avoir besoin qu’ils soient admirables, car c’est un grand plaisir pour l’esprit de distinguer ces peintures profondes et d’aimer d’une amitiĂ© sans Ă©goĂŻsme, sans phrases, comme en soi-mĂȘme.
”
”
Marcel Proust (Days of Reading (Penguin Great Ideas))
“
Les Occidentaux, toujours animĂ©s par ce besoin de prosĂ©lytisme qui leur est si particulier, sont arrivĂ©s Ă  faire pĂ©nĂ©trer chez les autres, dans une certaine mesure, leur esprit antitraditionnel et matĂ©rialiste ; et, tandis que la premiĂšre forme d’invasion n’atteignait en somme que les corps, celle-ci empoisonne les intelligences et tue la spiritualitĂ© ; l’une a d’ailleurs prĂ©parĂ© l’autre et l’a rendue possible, de sorte que ce n’est en dĂ©finitive que par la force brutale que l’Occident est parvenu Ă  s’imposer partout, et il ne pouvait en ĂȘtre autrement, car c’est en cela que rĂ©side l’unique supĂ©rioritĂ© rĂ©elle de sa civilisation, si infĂ©rieure Ă  tout autre point de vue. L’envahissement occidental, c’est l’envahissement du matĂ©rialisme sous toutes ses formes, et ce ne peut ĂȘtre que cela ; tous les dĂ©guisements plus ou moins hypocrites, tous les prĂ©textes « moralistes », toutes les dĂ©clamations « humanitaires », toutes les habiletĂ©s d’une propagande qui sait Ă  l’occasion se faire insinuante pour mieux atteindre son but de destruction, ne peuvent rien contre cette vĂ©ritĂ©, qui ne saurait ĂȘtre contestĂ©e que par des naĂŻfs ou par ceux qui ont un intĂ©rĂȘt quelconque Ă  cette Ɠuvre vraiment « satanique », au sens le plus rigoureux du mot(*). (*)Satan, en hĂ©breu, c’est l’« adversaire », c’est-Ă -dire celui qui renverse toutes choses et les prend en quelque sorte Ă  rebours ; c’est l’esprit de nĂ©gation et de subversion, qui s’identifie Ă  la tendance descendante ou « infĂ©riorisante », « infernale » au sens Ă©tymologique, celle mĂȘme que suivent les ĂȘtres dans ce processus de matĂ©rialisation suivant lequel s’effectue tout le dĂ©veloppement de la civilisation moderne.
”
”
René Guénon (The Crisis of the Modern World)
“
They hung over the town, muted red, dark-pink, surrounded by every conceivable nuance of gray. The setting was wild and beautiful. Actually everyone should be in the streets, I thought, cars should be stopping, doors should be opened and drivers and passengers emerging with heads raised and eyes sparkling with curiosity and a craving for beauty, for what was it that was going on above our heads? However, a few glances at most were cast upward, perhaps followed by isolated comments about how beautiful the evening was, for sights like this were not exceptional, on the contrary, hardly a day passed without the sky being filled with fantastic cloud formations, each and every one illuminated in unique, never-to-be-repeated ways, and since what you see every day is what you never see, we lived our lives under the constantly changing sky without sparing it a glance or a thought.
”
”
Karl Ove KnausgÄrd (My Struggle: Book 1)
“
I was driving home one afternoon during this period when I rolled past a woman putting household objects and furniture out in her front yard. I figured it was a garage sale or she was termite bombing. As I moved past her house an object I saw stopped me. Dragged me into the present. A chair. The chair? The orange Danish modern chair that I broke and that subsequently broke up my marriage appeared to be sitting on her front lawn. “Impossible,” I thought. That was destroyed, thrown out, gone. I stopped my car abruptly in the street, opened my car door, and ran up into her yard. She was pulling more stuff out of her house. I said, “Hi. Hey, are you selling this stuff?” “Just take whatever you want. I’m leaving,” she said, going angrily about her business. “Where did you get this chair? I used to have one exactly like it. I’ve never seen another one.” “I found it,” she said. “Take it.” I inspected the chair. It had been carefully rebuilt, put back together. It was the chair. “Did you find this on the street up on the hill around the corner?” “Yeah,” she said. “Why?” “This chair destroyed my marriage.” She looked at me with a dark, stressed gaze for a second like she was looking through me at something burning in the distance and said, “Mine, too.” I didn’t ask any questions. Synchronicity was upon us. The causality was there, it was explainable, but the meaning of the object before us was at once unique and shared. It was some kind of black magic that sent my thoughts back to the garage wizard who kept Jung’s curtains locked up. What had he unleashed on this world, my world, her world, with this chair? “We have to take it out of circulation.” “Yes,” she said, catatonically, like how I felt. Then this stranger and I proceeded to destroy the chair with our hands and our feet until it was unfixable. We took a breath and looked down at the scattered chair shards. “Thanks,” she said. A horn honked. I turned to see my car, door open, sitting in the middle of the street, running. Someone needed to get by. “Good luck with everything,” I said, then walked back to my car and drove away, strangely relieved. I glanced in my rearview mirror and saw her making a pile of culprit pieces.
”
”
Marc Maron (Attempting Normal)
“
Here are two examples of just how strange and unique humans can be when they go about harming one another and caring for one another. The first example involves, well, my wife. So we’re in the minivan, our kids in the back, my wife driving. And this complete jerk cuts us off, almost causing an accident, and in a way that makes it clear that it wasn’t distractedness on his part, just sheer selfishness. My wife honks at him, and he flips us off. We’re livid, incensed. Asshole-where’s-the-cops-when-you-need-them, etc. And suddenly my wife announces that we’re going to follow him, make him a little nervous. I’m still furious, but this doesn’t strike me as the most prudent thing in the world. Nonetheless, my wife starts trailing him, right on his rear. After a few minutes the guy’s driving evasively, but my wife’s on him. Finally both cars stop at a red light, one that we know is a long one. Another car is stopped in front of the villain. He’s not going anywhere. Suddenly my wife grabs something from the front seat divider, opens her door, and says, “Now he’s going to be sorry.” I rouse myself feebly—“Uh, honey, do you really think this is such a goo—” But she’s out of the car, starts pounding on his window. I hurry over just in time to hear my wife say, “If you could do something that mean to another person, you probably need this,” in a venomous voice. She then flings something in the window. She returns to the car triumphant, just glorious. “What did you throw in there!?” She’s not talking yet. The light turns green, there’s no one behind us, and we just sit there. The thug’s car starts to blink a very sensible turn indicator, makes a slow turn, and heads down a side street into the dark at, like, five miles an hour. If it’s possible for a car to look ashamed, this car was doing it. “Honey, what did you throw in there, tell me?” She allows herself a small, malicious grin. “A grape lollipop.” I was awed by her savage passive-aggressiveness—“You’re such a mean, awful human that something must have gone really wrong in your childhood, and maybe this lollipop will help correct that just a little.” That guy was going to think twice before screwing with us again. I swelled with pride and love.
”
”
Robert M. Sapolsky (Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst)
“
n 1985, Bob Munro volunteered his time to go and serve in the poorest slums of Africa on behalf of the United Nations. He loved football. One day, he was passing through the Mathare slums in Nairobi, Kenya, which happens to be one of the poorest areas in the world, and where more than a quarter million people live in abject poverty and filth. He saw some children playing football, bare feet, in total grime— they weren’t actually playing football, but kicking each other. As he saw one of the children kick the other, he immediately shouted, ‘Foul’, and the game stopped. He got out of his car and being the white man, obviously stood out. As an ardent lover of football, he said, ‘This is not the way to play football.’ He took the ball and told the boys, ‘Tomorrow I will bring another ball and teach you how to play football.’ The next day, 600 children were there to play football. He made a rule that only those children who clean up the place be allowed to play. He started a volunteers’ group for self-help and said, ‘Those who want to play football as part of my team must clean up.’ The children got involved and started cleaning the slums, and out of love for football, slowly the entire area was cleaned. As time went by, he developed teams to play. He developed referees from within. Guess what was the result in four years? The Kenyan football eleven national team emerged from the same Mathare slums. Bob Munro has created thousands of football teams from there, but the rules are very unique. The rules are very clear that every player in those football teams must contribute 60 hours to social work and community service per month. Only then can they play football. They get additional points not for winning a game, but for completing a community service project such as cleaning, counselling and helping others. He has created 8,000 volunteers out of this system of community service through the love of football.
”
”
Shiv Khera (You Can Achieve More: Live By Design, Not By Default)
“
FOLCO : "Socialisme" et "communisme" sont devenus presque des gros mots. Quelle est l'essence de ce rĂȘve Ă  laquelle on pourrait s'identifier, au lieu de le repousser sans mĂȘme y rĂ©flĂ©chir ? TIZIANO : L'idĂ©e du socialisme Ă©tait simple : crĂ©er une sociĂ©tĂ© dans laquelle il n'y aurait pas de patrons pour contrĂŽler les moyens de production, moyens avec lesquels ils rĂ©duisent le peuple en esclavage; Si tu as une usine et que tu en es le patron absolu, tu peux licencier et embaucher Ă  ta guise, tu peu mĂȘme embaucher des enfants de douze ans et les faire travailler. Il est clair que tu engranges un profit Ă©norme, qui n'est pas dĂ» uniquement Ă  ton travail, mais Ă©galement au travail de ces personnes-lĂ . Alors, si les travailleurs participent dĂ©jĂ  Ă  l'effort de production, pourquoi ne pas les laisser copossĂ©der l'usine ? La sociĂ©tĂ© est pleine d'injustices. On regarde autour de soi et on se dit : mais comment, il n'est pas possible de rĂ©soudre ces injustices ? Je m'explique. Quelqu'un a une entreprise agricole en amont d'un fleuve avec beaucoup d'eau. Il peut construire une digue pour empĂȘcher que l'eau aille jusqu'au paysan dans la vallĂ©e, mais ce n'est pas juste. Ne peut-il pas, au contraire, trouver un accord pour que toute cette eau arrive Ă©galement chez celui qui se trouve en bas ? Le socialisme, c'est l'idĂ©e d'une sociĂ©tĂ© dans laquelle personne n'exploite le travail de l'autre. Chacun fait son devoir et, de tout ce qui a Ă©tĂ© fait en commun, chacun prend ce dont il a besoin. Cela signifie qu'il vit en fonction de ce dont il a besoin, qu'il n'accumule pas, car l'accumulation enlĂšve quelque chose aux autres et ne sert Ă  rien. Regarde, aujourd'hui, tous ces gens richissimes, mĂȘme en Italie ! Toute cette accumulation, Ă  quoi sert-elle ? Elle sert aux gens riches. Elle leur sert Ă  se construire un yacht, une gigantesque villa Ă  la mer. Souvent, tout cet argent n'est mĂȘme pas recyclĂ© dans le systĂšme qui produit du travail. Il y a quelque chose qui ne tourne pas rond. C'est de lĂ  qu'est nĂ©e l'idĂ©e du socialisme. FOLCO : Et le communisme ? Quelle est la diffĂ©rence entre le socialisme et le communisme ? TIZIANO : Le communisme a essayĂ© d'institutionnaliser l'aspiration socialiste, en crĂ©ant - on croit toujours que c'est la solution - des institutions et des organismes de contrĂŽle. DĂšs cet instant, le socialisme a disparu, parce que le socialisme a un fond anarchiste. Lorsqu'on commence Ă  mettre en place une police qui contrĂŽle combien de pain tu manges, qui oblige tout le monde Ă  aller au travail Ă  huit heures, et qui envoie au goulag ceux qui n'y vont pas, alors c'est fini. (p. 383-384)
”
”
Tiziano Terzani (La fine Ăš il mio inizio)
“
As she explained to her students, patients often awoke from very bad illnesses or cardiac arrests, talking about how they had been floating over their bodies. “Mm-hmmm,” Norma would reply, sometimes thinking, Yeah, yeah, I know, you were on the ceiling. Such stories were recounted so frequently that they hardly jolted medical personnel. Norma at the time had mostly chalked it up to some kind of drug reaction or brain malfunction, something like that. “No, really,” said a woman who’d recently come out of a coma. “I can prove it.” The woman had been in a car accident and been pronounced dead on arrival when she was brought into the emergency room. Medical students and interns had begun working on her and managed to get her heartbeat going, but then she had coded again. They’d kept on trying, jump-starting her heart again, this time stabilizing it. She’d remained in a coma for months, unresponsive. Then one day she awoke, talking about the brilliant light and how she remembered floating over her body. Norma thought she could have been dreaming about all kinds of things in those months when she was unconscious. But the woman told them she had obsessive-compulsive disorder and had a habit of memorizing numbers. While she was floating above her body, she had read the serial number on top of the respirator machine. And she remembered it. Norma looked at the machine. It was big and clunky, and this one stood about seven feet high. There was no way to see on top of the machine without a stepladder. “Okay, what’s the number?” Another nurse took out a piece of paper to jot it down. The woman rattled off twelve digits. A few days later, the nurses called maintenance to take the ventilator machine out of the room. The woman had recovered so well, she no longer needed it. When the worker arrived, the nurses asked if he wouldn’t mind climbing to the top to see if there was a serial number up there. He gave them a puzzled look and grabbed his ladder. When he made it up there, he told them that indeed there was a serial number. The nurses looked at each other. Could he read it to them? Norma watched him brush off a layer of dust to get a better look. He read the number. It was twelve digits long: the exact number that the woman had recited. The professor would later come to find out that her patient’s story was not unique. One of Norma’s colleagues at the University of Virginia Medical Center at the time, Dr. Raymond Moody, had published a book in 1975 called Life After Life, for which he had conducted the first large-scale study of people who had been declared clinically dead and been revived, interviewing 150 people from across the country. Some had been gone for as long as twenty minutes with no brain waves or pulse. In her lectures, Norma sometimes shared pieces of his research with her own students. Since Moody had begun looking into the near-death experiences, researchers from around the world had collected data on thousands and thousands of people who had gone through them—children, the blind, and people of all belief systems and cultures—publishing the findings in medical and research journals and books. Still, no one has been able to definitively account for the common experience all of Moody’s interviewees described. The inevitable question always followed: Is there life after death? Everyone had to answer that question based on his or her own beliefs, the professor said. For some of her students, that absence of scientific evidence of an afterlife did little to change their feelings about their faith. For others,
”
”
Erika Hayasaki (The Death Class: A True Story About Life)
“
Kalinske then described what made the videogame industry unique, what made it superbly unpredictable, and what tomorrow might or might not bring. But along this wild roller-coaster ride, there was one thing that would not change. “Suspension of disbelief. It’s always been the fundamental component of diversion, whether that diversion is books, movies, or the theater. Advances in gaming mean we will come to supply that component more effectively than any other medium. The interactive entertainment business is going to allow the Walter Mitty in all of us to finally realize our dreams. We are going to become great football players, race car drivers, or aviators. We are going to move into and occupy new worlds that were formerly only available to us in dreams.
”
”
Blake J. Harris (Console Wars: Sega, Nintendo, and the Battle that Defined a Generation)
“
Le mensonge n'a jamais paru répréhensible à Mouchette, car mentir est le plus précieux, et sans doute l'unique privilÚge des misérables.
”
”
Georges Bernanos (Mouchette)
“
At first, they joked about it but as they became more detoxed and more assertive from therapy, paid ironically by the husbands, they began to realize that they each had unique strengths and powers and a burning desire for revenge. Between the Three Wise Women they had an IT expert, an actress and a supermodel, all very wealthy and beautiful. All the three men’s’ brains appeared to reside in their pants and they wondered if they set a honey trap could it possibly work. A plan was proposed by Felicity and she called it Operation Devastation. Angelina would hack into their MIS computer systems, bug their telephones, offices, cars and homes. Ava would seduce Ryan, who owned Novels and the computer firm, Angelina’s husband in a honey trap and get it all on DVD for the divorce court. Then Ava would seduce Felicity’s husband, James, the Irish footballer. Finally, Sean who was Felicity’s friend who was an out of work actor would seduce Patrick
”
”
Annette J. Dunlea
“
An example is the campaign that Goodby, Berlin & Sil- verstein produced for the Northern California Honda Deal- ers Advertising Association (NCHDAA) in 1989. Rather than conform to the stereotypical dealer group advertising ("one of a kind, never to be repeated deals, this weekend 114 Figure 4.1 UNUM: "Bear and Salmon. Figure 4.2 UNUM: "Father and Child." 115 PEELING THE ONION only, the Honda-thon, fifteen hundred dollars cash back . . ." shouted over cheesy running footage), it was decided that the campaign should reflect the tone of the national cam- paign that it ran alongside. After all, we reasoned, the only people who know that one spot is from the national cam- paign and another from a regional dealer group are industry insiders. In the real world, all people see is the name "Honda" at the end. It's dumb having one of (Los Angeles agency) Rubin Postaer's intelligent, stylish commercials for Honda in one break, and then in the next, 30 seconds of car salesman hell, also apparently from Honda. All the good work done by the first ad would be undone by the second. What if, we asked ourselves, we could in some way regionalize the national message? In other words, take the tone and quality of Rubin Postaer's campaign and make it unique to Northern California? All of the regional dealer groups signed off as the Northern California Chevy/Ford/ Toyota Dealers, yet none of the ads would have seemed out of place in Florida or Wisconsin. In fact, that's probably where they got them from. In our research, we began not by asking people about cars, or car dealers, but about living in Northern California. What's it like? What does it mean? How would you describe it to an alien? (There are times when my British accent comes in very useful.) How does it compare to Southern California? "Oh, North and South are very different," a man in a focus group told me. "How so?" "Well, let me put it this way. There's a great rivalry between the (San Francisco) Giants and the (L.A.) Dodgers," he said. "But the Dodgers' fans don't know about it." Everyone laughed. People in the "Southland" were on a different planet. All they cared about was their suntans and flashy cars. Northern Californians, by comparison, were more modest, discerning, less likely to buy things to "make state- ments," interested in how products performed as opposed to 116 Take the Wider View what they looked like, more environmentally conscious, and concerned with the quality of life. We already knew from American Honda—supplied re- search what Northern Californians thought of Honda's cars. They were perceived as stylish without being ostentatious, reliable, understated, good value for the money . . . the paral- lels were remarkable. The creative brief asked the team to consider placing Honda in the unique context of Northern California, and to imagine that "Hondas are designed with Northern Californi- ans in mind." Dave O'Hare, who always swore that he hated advertising taglines and had no talent for writing them, came back immediately with a line to which he wanted to write a campaign: "Is Honda the Perfect Car for Northern Califor- nia, or What?" The launch commercial took advantage of the rivalry between Northern and Southern California. Set in the state senate chamber in Sacramento, it opens on the Speaker try- ing to hush the house. "Please, please," he admonishes, "the gentleman from Northern California has the floor." "What my Southern Californian colleague proposes is a moral outrage," the senator splutters, waving a sheaf of papers at the other side of the floor. "Widening the Pacific Coast Highway . . . to ten lanes!" A Southern Californian senator with bouffant hair and a pink tie shrugs his shoulders. "It's too windy," he whines (note: windy as in curves, not weather), and his fellow Southern Californians high-five and murmur their assent. The Northern Californians go nuts, and the Speaker strug- gles in vain to call everyone to order. The camera goes out- side as th
”
”
Anonymous
“
As the producer states gradually forced the major oil companies to share with them more of the profits from oil, increasing quantities of sterling and dollars flowed to the Middle East. To maintain the balance of payments and the viability of the international financial system, Britain and the United States needed a mechanism for these currency flows to be returned. [...] The purchase of most goods, whether consumable materials like food and clothing or more durable items such as cars or industrial machinery, sooner or later reaches a limit where, in practical terms, no more of the commodity can be used and further acquisition is impossible to justify. Given the enormous size of oil revenues, and the relatively small populations and widespread poverty of many of the countries beginning to accumulate them, ordinary goods could not be purchased at a rate that would go far to balance the flow of dollars (and many could be bought from third countries, like Germany and Japan – purchases that would not improve the dollar problem). Weapons, on the other hand, could be purchased to be stored up rather than used, and came with their own forms of justification. Under the appropriate doctrines of security, ever-larger acquisitions could be rationalised on the grounds that they would make the need to use them less likely. Certain weapons, such as US fighter aircraft, were becoming so technically complex by the 1960s that a single item might cost over $10 million, offering a particularly compact vehicle for recycling dollars. Arms, therefore, could be purchased in quantities unlimited by any practical need or capacity to consume. As petrodollars flowed increasingly to the Middle East, the sale of expensive weaponry provided a unique apparatus for recycling those dollars – one that could expand without any normal commercial constraint.
”
”
Timothy Mitchell (Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil)
“
Public travel during seclusion for work and as a result desires to situate for viable services anywhere they amount to acquire exceptional ability. As a result of that included just recently is through car leasing centers. Such takes enormously much less instant in addition to rises initiative effectiveness. Entirely comfort is supplied other than, similar to the rush to take a trip anywhere during the city. Along with if despite which occurs to the automobile was travelling the firm vehicle renting facilities immediately supply by an unique vehicle in order to take place their service quality by applying customary of the team. We can take delight to enjoy any kind of movie also as going. There certainly is no panic of the really train or bus to be missed because you will hold your individual automobile. Correctly there would be no plain time frame. You understand how you can yet assign a Month-to-month auto rental or any sort of such of cream of the crop vehicles. The enormous brand names are also accessible to hire. Corporate specific essentially make use of such exceptional vehicles to show their standard in addition to their personal business worth. Comfy vehicles to some sort of any sort of sector of car have the ability to be teased behalf to their different rates. All resorts of 5-star in addition to 7-star does not include the vehicles, however, work with vehicles. For that reason, we are able to simply envision the well worth of these assigning facilities there are lots of a Month-to-month auto rental and every these service supply with a much better service as different to others. When it comes to such reason vehicle rentals are taking a prospering in the company in addition to the regional marketplace. Therefore, the group needs to support their well worth in the market using providing a type of facilities for their consumers. Not merely in locally nevertheless in bunches of huge business towards other fundamentals requirements. Just as travelling within any of the individual owning if you figure out a little bit magnificent on the edge and seem like acquiring it on the other hand you still cannot for the reason that they won't drop in for you however here by methods of this Auto Lease Dubai you could acquire whatever you figure out in purchasing. The program can be all set according to your choices equally as not according to the typical timings of public transportation. During the Car Rental solution, the client will hold no concerns pertaining to the protection or safeguarding of the auto. One can pick Automobile Lease Dubai along with doing accordingly it will turn into unproblematic to opt for a vehicle of their option even as choices any auto. You be up to the trip to the appropriate location that you wish by applying the aid of this car rental. Called for credentials for transport are the look out of the services nonetheless we have to be reliable that it's a superior company with every obligatory certificate approved. If a person does not be full of the ability to get an automobile even though one could easily hire an automobile as it's not at every little thing costly to utilize this improvement.
”
”
Auto Hire Function as Improvement For Daily Travelling
“
Il n’est pas douteux – prĂ©cisons-le de suite – qu'il y ait eu des monuments Ă©crits antĂ©rieurs aux traitĂ©s dont le Yiking est le troisiĂšme. Ces monuments ont Ă©tĂ© Ă©crits, ou dessinĂ©s, ou sculptĂ©s, sur le « Toit du Monde », berceau unique de l’humanitĂ©, Ă  l’aide de signes que toute l’humanitĂ© comprenait, avant qu’elle se fĂ»t divisĂ©e par des migrations diverses, et qu’elle eĂ»t ainsi perdu la conscience de sa totalitĂ©. Ce qu’est cette Ă©criture unique, on ne le saura sans doute jamais qu’à l’aide d’approximatives apprĂ©ciations ; car un palĂ©ographe ne reconstruira pas une Ă©criture au moyen d’un jambage, comme Cuvier reconstruisait un mammouth au moyen d’une jambe. Mais c’est de cette Ă©criture unique que dĂ©coulent, Ă  des Ă©poques concordantes, et par des procĂ©dĂ©s de dĂ©formations parallĂšles, les hiĂ©rogrammes Chinois et les hiĂ©roglyphes ChaldĂ©ens (ou sumĂ©ro-acadiens). Il est possible toutefois de dĂ©terminer les influences, toutes physiques, qui prĂ©sidĂšrent Ă  ces dĂ©formations. Sur ce Pamir, qui fut notre commun berceau, une mĂȘme langue, une mĂȘme graphie, toutes deux perdues, rĂ©gnaient. Un jour, soit qu’un cataclysme ait amenĂ© sur ces altitudes le froid qui y rĂšgne aujourd’hui, soit que, Ă  force de se pencher sur le bord rugueux des plateaux, la race humaine ait pris le vertige des plaines inconnues, un jour vint oĂč les hommes, par les fleuves qui prenaient naissance aux plateaux primitifs, descendirent aux niveaux infĂ©rieurs. Ainsi ceux du Sud, les futurs Rouges, par le Dzangbo et le Sindh, ainsi ceux de l’Ouest, les futurs Blancs, par le Syr et l’Amou, ainsi ceux de l’Est, les futurs Jaunes, par le Hoangho et le YangtzĂ©, tous, sans regarder en arriĂšre, quittĂšrent la montagne ancestrale qui fut le nombril du monde. Parmi eux, les vieillards et les savants emportĂšrent la Sagesse et la Tradition.
”
”
Matgioi (La voie métaphysique)
“
Many gun control academics use language that is hardly scholarly, attacking academics they disagree with as being paid off by the “execrable NRA.” They claim that “gun sellers call the shots at the NRA.”5 They accuse others of having “blood on [their] hands” or being a “blight on democracy.” Apparently, finding evidence of defensive gun uses brings “harm to the democratic process.”6 There are other less obvious claims that are just as outrageous. No, the United States isn’t unique in terms of mass public shootings or homicides. No, gun bans don’t make people safer. Background checks on private transfers haven’t stopped mass public shootings or any other type of crime in the U.S. or other countries. Background checks are racist. And there are real problems with background checks that harm the most vulnerable. Gun control advocates have it backwards when they claim that gun makers have something to learn about how to reduce accidents from looking at government regulation of cars.
”
”
John R. Lott Jr. (The War on Guns: Arming Yourself Against Gun Control Lies)
“
The mechanism of the clock was enclosed in a box resembling a large cupboard, but I was disappointed with the workings. They were much smaller than I had anticipated. The clock was worked by heavy weights suspended on long cables. My father picked up a handle like the crank handle of a car and wound them up. There were two of them. One to work the hands, the other controlling the hammer which struck out the hours on a large bell. Then the mousetraps were set, Not to catch mice, but to control the lighting. Previously my father had to make a special trip each evening to switch on the lights of the clock, returning near midnight to switch them off. To obviate this he invented a method of light control which may have been unique. Two switches, one for switching on and the other for switching off were used. They were fixed on the inside wall of the tower. A mousetrap mounted near each switch was so arranged that when the trap sprung, the arc traversed by the closing trap enabled the switch to be flicked on or off as required. Adjustable sleeves were set along the the cables for required times. The sleeves on the descending cables tripped the mouse traps which actuated the switches.
”
”
William Perry (The End of an Era: Life in Old Eaglehawk and Bendigo)
“
Carly went back and forth between several of the paintings, trying to decide which one was least likely to frighten small children. “You know, your work is very 
 unique, Hazel. I can honestly say I’ve never seen anything quite like it.
”
”
Mariah Stewart (On Sunset Beach: The Chesapeake Diaries)
“
L’idĂ©e du « libre examen » fut inventĂ©e pour dĂ©truire l’autoritĂ© spirituelle, non pas en la niant purement et simplement tout d’abord, mais en lui substituant une fausse autoritĂ©, celle de la raison individuelle, ou encore que le « rationalisme » philosophique prit Ă  tĂąche de remplacer l’intellectualitĂ© par ce qui n’en est que la caricature. L’idĂ©e de « valeur » nous paraĂźt se rattacher plutĂŽt au second cas : il y a dĂ©jĂ  longtemps qu’on ne reconnaĂźt plus, en fait, aucune hiĂ©rarchie rĂ©elle, c’est-Ă -dire fondĂ©e essentiellement sur la nature mĂȘme des choses ; mais, pour une raison ou pour une autre, que nous n’entendons pas rechercher ici, il a paru opportun (non pas sans doute aux philosophes, car ils ne sont vraisemblablement en cela que les premiĂšres dupes) d’instaurer dans la mentalitĂ© publique une fausse hiĂ©rarchie, basĂ©e uniquement sur des apprĂ©ciations sentimentales, donc entiĂšrement « subjective » (et d’autant plus inoffensive, au point de vue de l’« Ă©galitarisme » moderne, qu’elle se trouve ainsi relĂ©guĂ©e dans les nuĂ©es de l’« idĂ©al », autant dire parmi les chimĂšres de l’imagination) ; on pourrait dire, en somme, que les « valeurs » reprĂ©sentent une contrefaçon de hiĂ©rarchie Ă  l’usage d’un monde qui a Ă©tĂ© conduit Ă  la nĂ©gation de toute vraie hiĂ©rarchie. [La superstition de la « valeur »]
”
”
René Guénon (Mélanges)
“
On a coutume, dans le monde occidental, de considĂ©rer l’islamisme comme une tradition essentiellement guerriĂšre et, par suite, lorsqu’il y est question notamment du sabre ou de l’épĂ©e (es-sayf), de prendre ce mot uniquement dans son sens le plus littĂ©ral, sans mĂȘme penser jamais Ă  se demander s’il n’y a pas lĂ  en rĂ©alitĂ© quelque chose d’autre. Il n’est d’ailleurs pas contestable qu’un certain cĂŽtĂ© guerrier existe dans l’islamisme, et aussi que, loin de constituer un caractĂšre particulier Ă  celui-ci, il se retrouve tout aussi bien dans la plupart des autres traditions, y compris le christianisme. Sans mĂȘme rappeler que le Christ lui-mĂȘme a dit : « Je ne suis pas venu apporter la paix, mais l’épĂ©e », ce qui peut en somme s’entendre figurativement, l’histoire de la ChrĂ©tientĂ© au moyen Ăąge, c’est-Ă -dire Ă  l’époque oĂč elle eut sa rĂ©alisation effective dans les institutions sociales, en fournit des preuves largement suffisantes ; et, d’autre part, la tradition hindoue elle-mĂȘme, qui certes ne saurait passer pour spĂ©cialement guerriĂšre, puisqu’on tend plutĂŽt en gĂ©nĂ©ral Ă  lui reprocher de n’accorder que peu de place Ă  l’action, contient pourtant aussi cet aspect, comme on peut s’en rendre compte en lisant la BhagavadgĂźtĂą. À moins d’ĂȘtre aveuglĂ© par certains prĂ©jugĂ©s, il est facile de comprendre qu’il en soit ainsi, car dans le domaine social, la guerre, en tant qu’elle est dirigĂ©e contre ceux qui troublent l’ordre et qu’elle a pour but de les y ramener, constitue une fonction lĂ©gitime, qui n’est au fond qu’un des aspects de la fonction de « justice » entendue dans son acception la plus gĂ©nĂ©rale. Cependant, ce n’est lĂ  que le cĂŽtĂ© le plus extĂ©rieur des choses, donc le moins essentiel : au point de vue traditionnel, ce qui donne Ă  la guerre ainsi comprise toute sa valeur, c’est qu’elle symbolise la lutte que l’homme doit mener contre les ennemis qu’il porte en lui-mĂȘme, c’est-Ă -dire contre tous les Ă©lĂ©ments qui, en lui, sont contraires Ă  l’ordre et Ă  l’unitĂ©. Dans les deux cas, du reste, et qu’il s’agisse de l’ordre extĂ©rieur et social ou de l’ordre intĂ©rieur et spirituel, la guerre doit toujours tendre Ă©galement Ă  Ă©tablir l’équilibre et l’harmonie (et c’est pourquoi elle se rapporte proprement Ă  la « justice »), et Ă  unifier par lĂ  d’une certaine façon la multiplicitĂ© des Ă©lĂ©ments en opposition entre eux. Cela revient Ă  dire que son aboutissement normal, et qui est en dĂ©finitive son unique raison d’ĂȘtre, c’est la paix (es-salĂąm), laquelle ne peut ĂȘtre obtenue vĂ©ritablement que par la soumission Ă  la volontĂ© divine (el-islĂąm), mettant chacun des Ă©lĂ©ments Ă  sa place pour les faire tous concourir Ă  la rĂ©alisation consciente d’un mĂȘme plan ; et il est Ă  peine besoin de faire remarquer combien, dans la langue arabe, ces deux termes, el-islĂąm et es-salĂąm, sont Ă©troitement apparentĂ©s l’un Ă  l’autre.
”
”
René Guénon (Symbols of Sacred Science)
“
Just a simple premise, back in San Diego DUI Lawyer arrested for drunk Style, this time in the direction of DUI and DWI generally unwanted, then little effect of alcohol is considered a leading progressive life. Americans in the second half of the US states, the sin just because the rules and stricter drunk driving laws more quickly hold. In addition, the results of all DUI lawyers in reality very difficult drive under the influence towards an unattainable production, to begin in San Diego that idea. The crime of DUI evaluation Provide always stops short of energy, but in reality because of traffic law enforcement to detect beautiful website, or you attack affects themselves can take to throw noted "checkpoints drinking water.” In some cases, the federal government said, but if you can do it in your own direction. Perhaps many car hit the rear part of the food as a result, the impact is recorded, your visit to show you the direction of your wine. Sometimes, someone reported an unstable support. Testing and observation around the federal government s decision in the same direction, it is not possible because most almost certainly to predict a jump back in their element. One or suspected poisoning at an affordable price set is designed to bring cases, their own rules and objectives, and with violation of traffic rules and the management style of the design more I can do for others the problem of selection that. They probably own the actual direction of their own drug, think about the purpose of the implementation of a user, then the friendly and with respect to speed, self-revealed the reason behind the purple party, appreciate it is also possible to DUI . San Diego right outcome for prison several internal unique opportunity, California expert is passed on to its customers and the code of .08% blood only a small car in California 23 152 (B) to answer good article Content (BAC) Assumption. Some of the inspiration for a special person for a month was necessary direction behind a person s mood, depends on you in the direction 23 § 152, may continue to be withheld because (). But in general, if not more, the sales people and just keep moving to stay DUI by police and they are removed direction or enough I began to feel, "personal involvement" is more than if under strict bail. Own all presentation of their work is to show. It s just maybe you just conditions, it is deposited in jail until eventually show itself may not be able to move allows. Expenses and income are affected by lead you affects costs, which child to leave behind, if not more than 0.08 per cent BAC does. Orientation, under the influence of the value of his research, the car broke into the possibility that some 23 152 have been found still proof (s). This is a normal move, and then the authority to suspend the system 6 is due to the fact that - 10 weeks, including perceived importance. Speaking of the court will have to apply for leave to the invention apparently drunk over in his address. Need him inside, a number of situations, the judge called a good time without alcohol can be. It is a matter, as long as the direction before the costly DUI do not experience a period of several weeks is legal. Worse, if there is only a repeat show that only a lawyer in San Diego drunk orientation. Too many of the legal rights of citizens under such guidelines as privatization and arms, vote. You own run for the benefit of all to make the removal of the time, which likely cost drivers behind the repeat drink. It is strong enough to get to San Diego recommends a good DUI is for that reason that the domestic legal experts. Obviously, the motivation many cases immediately, in simplest terms, is not swallowed. Self re direction is not the same thing, so you really recommended maximum future problem is to apply to yourself. This is a perfect example of the court had been found.
”
”
TerrySchrader
“
Plus d’État mais seulement la sociĂ©tĂ©, plus de principe mais seulement une gestion des pulsions sociales, et au centre un gentil organisateur, un plancton dont les obsessions quantitativo-statistiques abolissent la sphĂšre de la politique et la remplacent par le nĂ©ant d’un babillage dĂ©magogique non si­gnifiant, purement phonique, phatique, autour duquel la presse s’onanise et le public bĂ©e. La vocation intellectuelle, ar­tistique et spirituelle de l’homme disparaĂźt sous les coups du nivellement de masse, car l’homme n’est ici qu'un travailleur, le rouage d’une Ă©nergie productrice qu’il faut rendre opĂ©ra­tionnel le plus rapidement possible ; on lui invente un collĂšge unique dont disparaĂźt progressivement toute connaissance vé­ritable, un lieu d’abrutissement intellectuellement dĂ©finalisĂ©, d’éducation technique de groupe, afin que toutes les espĂšces et catĂ©gories du troupeau puissent parvenir plus largement au degrĂ© de qualification qui les asservira au quantitatif, tandis que le monde entier afflue Ă  MicrocĂ©phalopolis afin de rem­plir les cases laissĂ©es vides. Les chiffres broient l’homme, la matiĂšre est placĂ©e au-dessus de l’esprit, la technique au-dessus du savoir, l’intĂ©rĂȘt au-dessus de toute gratuitĂ© ; plus d’hon­neur, de civilitĂ©, de gĂ©nĂ©rositĂ©, plus de famille, plus d’amitiĂ©. Dans ce contexte le mĂ©lange culturel s’inscrit non comme une louable ouverture mais comme la colonisation d’un espace in­tellectuel vide parce que volontairement dĂ©sertĂ©. MicrocĂ©phalopolis s'identifie Ă  ce dĂ©sert pour devenir jungle, elle veut n’ĂȘtre que friche et fiche, elle veut n’ĂȘtre rien, elle vĂ©nĂšre les raclĂ©es, elle nie ses origines sauf pour s’inventer de mythologiques fautes oĂč peut ainsi s’exercer sa haine de soi, c’est-Ă -dire de la spiritualitĂ© dont elle devrait ĂȘtre porteuse. Elle est cette nation devenue elle-mĂȘme femelle et que ses attitudes de mo­rue exposent continuellement au viol. Refusant de porter un quelque regard sur sa situation, se fĂ©licitant de tout ce qui n'est pas sa nature et dont elle se remplit, elle tend sa croupe Ă  tout vent et enfonce la tĂȘte dans le sable en des maniĂšres d'autruche dĂ©nĂ©gatrice et nymphomane.
”
”
Maxence Caron
“
Failures as people: millions of Americans felt that this description fit them to a T. Seeking a solution, any solution, they eagerly forked over their cash to any huckster who promised release, the quicker and more effortlessly the better: therapies like “bioenergetics” (“The Revolutionary Therapy That Uses the Language of the Body to Heal the Problems of the Mind”); Primal Scream (which held that when patients shrieked in a therapist’s office, childhood trauma could be reexperienced, then released; John Lennon and James Earl Jones were fans); or Transcendental Meditation, which promised that deliverance could come if you merely closed your eyes and chanted a mantra (the “TM” organization sold personal mantras, each supposedly “unique,” to hundreds of thousands of devotees). Or “religions” like the Church Universal and Triumphant, or the Reverend Sun Myung Moon’s Unification Church, or “Scientology”—this last one invented by a science fiction writer, reportedly on a bet. Devotees paid cash to be “audited” by practitioners who claimed the power—if, naturally, you paid for enough sessions—to remove “trauma patterns” accreted over the 75 million years that had passed since Xenu, tyrant of the Galactic Confederacy, deposited billions of people on earth next to volcanoes and detonated hydrogen bombs inside those volcanos, thus scattering harming “body thetans” to attach to the souls of the living, which once unlatched allowed practitioners to cross the “bridge to total freedom” and “unlimited creativity.” Another religion, the story had it, promised “perfect knowledge”—though its adherents’ public meeting was held up several hours because none of them knew how to run the movie projector. Gallup reported that six million Americans had tried TM, five million had twisted themselves into yoga poses, and two million had sampled some sort of Oriental religion. And hundreds of thousands of Americans in eleven cities had plunked down $250 for the privilege being screamed at as “assholes.” “est”—Erhard Seminars Training, named after the only-in-America hustler who invented it, Werner Erhard, originally Jack Rosenberg, a former used-car and encyclopedia salesman who had tried and failed to join the Marines (this was not incidental) at the age of seventeen, and experienced a spiritual rebirth one morning while driving across the Golden Gate Bridge (“I realized that I knew nothing. . . . In the next instant—after I realized that I knew nothing—I realized that I knew everything”)—promised “to transform one’s ability to experience living so that the situations one had been trying to change or had been putting up with, clear up just in the process of life itself,” all that in just sixty hours, courtesy of a for-profit corporation whose president had been general manager of the Coca-Cola Bottling Company of California and a former member of the Harvard Business School faculty. A
”
”
Rick Perlstein (The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan)
“
« Personne parmi ceux qui sont venu aprĂšs les compagnons [du ProphĂšte] n'ont pu atteindre leur niveau (aux compagnons). Ceci est du au fait que la plupart des sciences que nous cherchons et sur lesquelles nous nous focalisons jour et nuit, telles la linguistique, la grammaire, la morphologie et les fondements de la jurisprudence, Ă©taient innĂ©s chez eux. Leur haute disposition intellectuelle ainsi que la lumiĂšre de la prophĂ©tie qui les irradiait (Ă  travers le ProphĂšte) les protĂ©geait de l'erreur et des divagations. Ils n'avaient donc pas besoin d'utiliser la logique ou d'autres sciences rationnelles. Lorsqu'AllĂąh a unit leur cƓur et grĂące Ă  Sa bontĂ©, Il a suscitĂ© la fraternitĂ© entre eux, et ils ne leur Ă©tait pas nĂ©cessaire de se prĂ©parer aux dĂ©bats et Ă  l'argumentation. GrĂące Ă  leur science, ils n'avaient pas besoin de sauvegarder ce qu'ils entendaient du Qur°ùn et de la Sunnah par le biais du ProphĂšte. Ils comprenaient rapportaient et appliquaient ce qu'ils entendaient du ProphĂšte de la meilleur des maniĂšres. Aucun des compagnons ne dĂ©battait ni ne polĂ©miquait Ă  propos du Qur°ùn car il n'y avait pas d'Ă©garement ni d'innovations. AprĂšs cette Ă©poque les Suivants (at tĂąbi'Ă»n) Ă©taient proche d'eux si l'on se rĂ©fĂšre Ă  leur rang [auprĂšs d'AllĂąh] et Ă  leur mĂ©thodologie. AprĂšs les Suivants vinrent leurs disciples directs. Le ProphĂšte a tĂ©moignĂ© des vertus de ces trois gĂ©nĂ©rations. Par la suite les Gens de l'Innovation et de l'Egarement qui Ă©taient peu nombreux Ă  l'Ă©poque des trois premiĂšres gĂ©nĂ©rations virent leur nombre augmenter. Ainsi, afin de dĂ©fendre l'IslĂąm, les savants parmi les Ahl Us Sunnah, durent se confronter Ă  eux et dĂ©battre de peur que les faibles d'esprit s'Ă©garent, et qu'on voit s'ajouter des choses qui sont Ă©trangĂšres Ă  la religion. Les arguments des Gens de l'Innovation Ă©taient de plus en plus influencĂ©s par les travaux des logiciens et d'autres Gens de l'HĂ©rĂ©sie qui par la suite prirent l'habitude de crĂ©er beaucoup de doutes pour les utiliser contre nous (les Ahl Us Sunnah). Si nous les avions laissĂ© faire ils auraient convaincu de nombreuses personnes faibles et ignorantes parmi les Musulmans ainsi que les juristes et les savants nĂ©gligents ; la croyance saine aurait Ă©tĂ© alors altĂ©rĂ©e et des Ă©garements auraient Ă©tĂ© introduits. Des innovations blĂąmables et des hĂ©rĂ©sies se seraient alors rĂ©pandues. Il n'Ă©tait pas possible pour un simple individu de leur rĂ©pliquer et il y avait des risques que leur mots ne soient pas compris par tous, car les gens ne s'y intĂ©ressaient pas eux-mĂȘmes. Le point de vue des innovateurs peut ĂȘtre uniquement rĂ©futĂ© par quelqu'un qui les comprends. Tant que l'innovateur n'est pas rĂ©futĂ©, sa croyance devient dominante : les ignorants, les rois, les dirigeants, et ceux en charge de la population se mettent Ă  croire alors que les paroles prononcĂ©es par l'innovateur sont vĂ©ridiques. C'est ce qui s'est justement passĂ© dans plusieurs contrĂ©es dans lesquelles les gens avaient moins d'aspirations [aux sciences religieuses] si on les compare aux gens des gĂ©nĂ©rations prĂ©cĂ©dentes. A cause de cela, il Ă©tait devenu obligatoire pour les gens par le biais desquels AllĂąh Ă  prĂ©servĂ© la croyance de Ses croyants vertueux de repousser les doutes Ă©mis par les hĂ©rĂ©tiques. En effet la rĂ©compense octroyĂ©e est de loin plus grande que la rĂ©compense accordĂ©e Ă  un soldat combattant dans le sentier d'AllĂąh. »
”
”
ŰȘقي Ű§Ù„ŰŻÙŠÙ† Ű§Ù„ŰłŰšÙƒÙŠ
“
He liked the smell of her old car, the way it reminded him of a unique mixture of the half-drunk coffee cups always sitting in the cupholders, drive-through french fry splurges, and her soap. The way her car smelled like her. Her new car smells like nothing.
”
”
Marybeth Mayhew Whalen (Only Ever Her)
“
Let’s take a moment to acknowledge just how extraordinary your brain is. It generates up to 70,000 thoughts per day. It races with the speed of the fastest race car. Like your fingerprints, it is uniquely yours—there aren’t two brains in the universe exactly the same. It processes dramatically faster than any existing computer, and it has virtually infinite storage capacity. Even when damaged, it is capable of producing genius, and even if you only have half a brain, you can still be a fully functioning human being.
”
”
Jim Kwik (Limitless: Upgrade Your Brain, Learn Anything Faster, and Unlock Your Exceptional Life)
“
As we marvel at the prospects of genomic editing, self-driving cars, and humanoid companions, we have to keep in mind that our present-day reality binds us to a certain amount of perceptual bias. Fight-or-flight may have kept our prehistoric ancestors from getting eaten by a saber-toothed tiger, but over time it has stunted our unique ability to daydream about and plan for a better future.
”
”
Amy Webb (The Signals Are Talking: Why Today's Fringe Is Tomorrow's Mainstream)
“
Cette courbe est fondamentale, car elle permet de mieux comprendre le dialogue difficile qui caractĂ©rise parfois le dĂ©bat public sur la mondialisation : certains s’émerveillent de la rĂ©duction des inĂ©galitĂ©s et de la pauvretĂ© mondiales que permettrait la formidable croissance des pays les moins avancĂ©s, alors que d’autres se lamentent de la hausse massive des inĂ©galitĂ©s qu’entraĂźneraient inexorablement les excĂšs de l’hypercapitalisme mondialisĂ©. En rĂ©alitĂ©, l’un et l’autre discours ont chacun leur part de vĂ©ritĂ© : les inĂ©galitĂ©s ont diminuĂ© entre le bas et le milieu de la rĂ©partition mondiale des revenus, et elles ont augmentĂ© entre le milieu et le haut de la distribution. Ces deux aspects de la mondialisation sont tout aussi rĂ©els l’un que l’autre, et la question n’est pas de nier l’un ou l’autre, mais bien plutĂŽt de savoir comment faire pour conserver les bons aspects de la mondialisation tout en se dĂ©barrassant des mauvais. On notera au passage l’importance du langage, des catĂ©gories et du dispositif cognitif utilisĂ© : si l’on dĂ©crivait les inĂ©galitĂ©s par un indicateur unique, comme le coefficient de Gini, alors on pourrait avoir l’illusion que rien ne change, prĂ©cisĂ©ment car l’on ne se donnerait pas les moyens de voir que les Ă©volutions sont complexes et multidimensionnelles, et que l’on laisse plusieurs effets se mĂȘler et se compenser au sein d’un indicateur unique. C’est pourquoi dans ce livre je n’aurai pas recours Ă  ce type d’indicateur « synthĂ©tique ». Je prendrai toujours soin de dĂ©crire les inĂ©galitĂ©s et leur Ă©volution en distinguant clairement les diffĂ©rents dĂ©ciles et centiles de revenus et patrimoines concernĂ©s, et par consĂ©quent les groupes sociaux en jeu.
”
”
Thomas Piketty (Capital and Ideology)
“
Je suis toujours triste lorsque les hommes ne voient en moi qu’une femme. Ils ne comprennent pas que mon genre est pluriel, que je puisse partager avec eux une tradition masculine sans ĂȘtre uniquement un homme. À leurs yeux, c’est mon cĂŽtĂ© imparfait, ratĂ© ou non assumĂ©. Je sais pourtant leurs maniĂšres de s’approprier le monde et de parler, de se tenir, de rire. Je sais intuitivement la distance Ă  entretenir, la force Ă  mettre dans la poignĂ©e de main, l’intensitĂ© Ă  placer dans le regard. Nous partageons aussi la mĂȘme masculinitĂ© toxique dont nous tentons de nous dĂ©faire. Mais je ne rebute pas ma voix aiguĂ«, mes seins, ni mon visage sans barbe et cela les Ă©tonne. Ils ne comprennent pas ma familiaritĂ© avec les femmes, leurs forces, leurs inspirations, leurs peurs et leurs luttes. Ils ne comprennent pas que je ne souhaite jamais passer complĂštement pour un homme. À mes yeux, cette double condition est ce qui me permet d’ĂȘtre complĂšte et d’apparaĂźtre dans le rĂ©el. J’existe en ce monde dans la traversĂ©e des genres. Je suis simultanĂ©itĂ©. Je ne peux pas choisir entre ĂȘtre un homme ou ĂȘtre une femme, car ce serait choisir entre une moitiĂ© de cƓur et l’autre. J’ai besoin des deux pour vivre. C’est un tissage de rĂ©cits impossible Ă  dĂ©faire ; leurs brins entrelacĂ©s constituent ma matiĂšre et me donnent forme en ce monde. Je ne voudrais pas vivre autrement (p. 126-127).
”
”
MariÚve Maréchale (La Minotaure)
“
Le monde est ma reprĂ©sentation : voilĂ  une vĂ©ritĂ© valable Ă  l'Ă©gard de tout ĂȘtre vivant et connaissant, bien que l'homme seul puisse la porter Ă  sa connaisance abstraite et rĂ©flĂ©chie. DĂšs qu'il y sera parvenu, du mĂȘme coup il aura acquis le jugement philosophique. Il saura alors clairement dĂ©montrĂ© pour lui qu'il ne connaĂźt pas un soleil ni une terre, mais toujours uniquement un oeil qui voit un soleil, une main qui sent le contact d'une terre ; que le monde qui l'environne n'existe que comme reprĂ©sentation, c'est-Ă -dire entiĂšrement et uniquement par rapport Ă  un autre ĂȘtre, celui qui perçoit ; et cet ĂȘtre, c'est lui-mĂȘme. S'il est une vĂ©ritĂ© qu'on puisse Ă©noncer a priori, c'est bien celle-lĂ  ; car elle est l'expression de cette forme de toute expĂ©rience possible et concevable, qui est plus gĂ©nĂ©rale que toutes les autres, telles que le temps, l'espace, la causalitĂ© : car celles-ci supposent dĂ©jĂ  celle-lĂ  [...] Aucune vĂ©ritĂ© n'est donc plus certaine, plus indĂ©pendante de toute autre et ayant moins besoin de preuves que celle-ci : tout ce qui existe existe pour la connaissance, c'est-Ă -dire le monde entier, n'est objet que par rapport au sujet, n'est que perception de celui qui perçoit, en un mot, reprĂ©sentation.
”
”
Arthur Schopenhauer (Le Monde comme volonté et comme représentation)
“
Since the 19th century, medicine has focused on specific disease states by linking collections of signs and symptoms to single organs.... Systems biology and its offspring, sometimes called Network Medicine, takes a more wholistic approach, looking at all the diverse genetic, metabolic, and environmental factors that contribute to clinical disease. Equally important, it looks at the preclinical manifestations of pathology. The current focus of medicine is much like the focus that an auto mechanic takes to repair a car. The diagnostic process isolates a broken part and repairs or replaces it.... Although this strategy has saved countless lives and reduced pain and suffering, it nevertheless treats the disease and not the patient, with all their unique habits, lifestyle mistakes, environmental exposures, psychosocial interactions, and genetic predispositions.
”
”
Paul Cerrato (Reinventing Clinical Decision Support: Data Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, and Diagnostic Reasoning (HIMSS Book Series))
“
Quand vous parlez d'un projet autour de vous, vous recevez trois types de rĂ©actions : les neutres, les rĂ©actions d'encouragement et les rĂ©actions nĂ©gatives qui tendent Ă  vous faire renoncer.– C'est clair ...– Il faut Ă  tout prix vous Ă©loigner des personnes dont vous sentez qu'elles pourraient vous dĂ©courager. En tout cas, ne leur confiez pas vos projets.– Oui, mais, d'un certain cĂŽtĂ©, cela peut ĂȘtre utile que des gens vous ouvrent les yeux si vous faites fausse route.– Pour cela, adressez-vous uniquement Ă  des connaisseurs dans le domaine qui vous intĂ©resse. Mais il ne faut pas vous confier aux personnes qui chercheraient Ă  vous dĂ©courager juste pour rĂ©pondre Ă  leurs propres besoins psychologiques. Par exemple, il y a des gens qui se sentent mieux quand vous allez mal, et qui font donc tout pour que vous n'alliez pas mieux ! Ou d'autres qui dĂ©testeraient vous voir rĂ©aliser vos rĂȘves car cela leur rappellerait leur absence de courage pour rĂ©aliser les leurs. Il existe aussi des gens qui se sentent valorisĂ©s par vos difficultĂ©s parce que cela leur donne l'occasion de vous aider. Dans ce cas, les projets qui viennent de vous leur coupent l'herbe sous le pied, et ils feront ce qu'ils peuvent pour vous en dissuader. Cela nĂ© sert Ă  rien de leur en vouloir car ils font cela inconsciemment. Mais il est prĂ©fĂ©rable de ne pas leur confier vos plans. Ils vous feraient perdre votre confiance en vous. Vous vous souvenez qu'hier nous avons parlĂ© du bĂ©bĂ© qui apprend Ă  marcher et ne se dĂ©courage jamais, malgrĂ© ses Ă©checs Ă  rĂ©pĂ©tition ?– Oui.– S'il persĂ©vĂšre et finit par rĂ©ussir, c'est notamment parce que aucun parent au monde ne doute de la capacitĂ© de son enfant Ă  marcher, et aucune personne au monde ne va le dĂ©courager dans ses tentatives. Alors qu'une fois adulte, nombreux seront les gens qui vont le dissuader de rĂ©aliser ses rĂȘves. pensez Ă  quelqu'un de plus Ă©loignĂ©, peut-ĂȘtre un aĂŻeul ou un ami d'enfance, mĂȘme si vous ne le voyez pas souvent. Si vraiment vous ne trouvez pas, vous pouvez aussi penser Ă  une personne disparue, qui vous a aimĂ© de son vivant. Pensez Ă  elle et dites-vous: « Je sais que lĂ  oĂč elle est, si elle me voit monter ce projet, elle croit en moi.» DĂšs que vous avez des doutes, pensez Ă  elle et voyez-la vous encourager car elle sait que vous allez rĂ©ussir. Il y a aussi des gens qui croient en Dieu et obtiennent de lui la force d'agir. NapolĂ©on Ă©tait, quant Ă  lui, convaincu qu'il avait une bonne Ă©toile. Lors de la plupart de ses batailles, mĂȘme lorsqu'elles Ă©taient mal engagĂ©es, il restait persuadĂ© qu'il gagnerait, avec l'aide de cette bonne Ă©toile. Cela l'a Ă©normĂ©ment stimulĂ© et lui a fourni un courage souvent dĂ©terminant.
”
”
Laurent Gounelle
“
Piers Morgan Piers Morgan is a British journalist best known for his editorial work for the Daily Mirror from 1995 through 2004. He is also a successful author and television personality whose recent credits include a recurring role as a judge on NBC’s America’s Got Talent. A controversial member of the tabloid press during Diana’s lifetime, Piers Morgan established a uniquely close relationship with the Princess during the 1990s. “What’s been the most upsetting thing you’ve had to read about yourself?” “Well, those pictures the other day of my supposed cellulite upset me a lot actually. It really hurt me. It was too painful, too personal. It’s my body everyone was talking about, not just my face. I felt invaded because they put the cameras deliberately onto my legs.” Diana’s relationship with the paparazzi was obviously complex. She professed to hate them: “I know most of the paparazzi and their number plates. They think I am stupid but I know where they are. I’ve had ten years practice. I would support an antistalking bill tomorrow.” Then she took me to the window and started showing me the various media cars, vans, and motorbikes lurking outside. But when I asked why she doesn’t go out of one of the ten other more discreet exits, she exposed her contrary side: “I want to go out the front like anyone else. Why should I change my life for them?” “Because it would make your life easier?” I said. William was equally upset by the constant prying lenses: “Why do they have to chase my mother around so much? It’s unfair on her.” I was torn between genuine concern for the young man protecting his mum so gallantly, and a sense of foreboding for him that one day it would be him, not his mother, who would be chased just as aggressively. How do you explain to a thirteen-year-old boy that he sells papers and therefor he’s a valuable commodity to photographers and editors like me?
”
”
Larry King (The People's Princess: Cherished Memories of Diana, Princess of Wales, From Those Who Knew Her Best)
“
Piers Morgan Piers Morgan is a British journalist best known for his editorial work for the Daily Mirror from 1995 through 2004. He is also a successful author and television personality whose recent credits include a recurring role as a judge on NBC’s America’s Got Talent. A controversial member of the tabloid press during Diana’s lifetime, Piers Morgan established a uniquely close relationship with the Princess during the 1990s. We’d finished our coffee. The lunch was over. Two bizarre hours that had flashed by like some high-octane fireworks display. The Princess took me downstairs back to the real world, asking me as we walked not to tell James Whitaker, our royal correspondent, too much about our lunch. “Just throw him a morsel every six months to drive him mad,” she said. “He’s a terrible skier,” said William. We stepped out into the forecourt. Diana shook my hand, then darted over to speak to my very excited driver. As she shook his hand, too, she reached for his ample neck and exclaimed: “Ooh, what a nice tie--is it from Tie Rack?” It was. He will never wash it again. What a gal. I sat in the car, and started frantically scribbling notes. I didn’t want to forget any of this.
”
”
Larry King (The People's Princess: Cherished Memories of Diana, Princess of Wales, From Those Who Knew Her Best)
“
A person au fait with the millenarian edict of knowing oneself does not need a tattoo, pierced ear, or gaudy neck chains to declare who they are. Eccentricity for its own sake is simply a boring fashion statement and not a thoughtful statement of what comprises a wholesome self. A self-poised person does not need to own a luxury car to determine their degree of self-worth. Nor does a self-determined person need to idolize celebrities, hate other people whom they do not wish to exemplify, or live vicariously through other people’s admirable deeds. A person with unique and contented self-identify does not flip through fashion magazines or scan the headlines of gossip magazines when loitering in the supermarket checkout stand. A person who contemplates the meaningfulness of their existence is not fixated with posing in other people’s raiment or observing other people’s nakedness. A person who knows who they are and realizes how to accomplish all of their life goals does not dally by people watching or become distracted by envying other people.
”
”
Kilroy J. Oldster (Dead Toad Scrolls)
“
« Si pour un instant Dieu oubliait que je suis une marionnette de chiffon et m'offrait un morceau de vie, je profiterais de ce temps du mieux que je pourrais. Sans doute je ne dirais pas tout ce que je pense, mais je penserais tout ce que je dirais. Je donnerais du prix aux choses, non pour ce qu'elles valent, mais pour ce qu'elles reprĂ©sentent. Je dormirais peu, je rĂȘverais plus, sachant qu'en fermant les yeux, Ă  chaque minute nous perdons 60 secondes de lumiĂšre. Je marcherais quand les autres s'arrĂȘteraient, je me rĂ©veillerais quand les autres dormiraient. Si Dieu me faisait cadeau d'un morceau de vie, je m'habillerai simplement, je me coucherais Ă  plat ventre au soleil, laissant Ă  dĂ©couvert pas seulement mon corps, mais aussi mon Ăąme. Aux hommes, je montrerais comment ils se trompent, quand ils pensent qu'ils cessent d'ĂȘtre amoureux parce qu'ils vieillissent, sans savoir qu'ils vieillissent quand ils cessent d'ĂȘtre amoureux ! A l'enfant je donnerais des ailes mais je le laisserais apprendre Ă  voler tout seul. Au vieillard je dirais que la mort ne vient pas avec la vieillesse mais seulement avec l'oubli. J'ai appris tant de choses de vous les hommes
 J'ai appris que tout le monde veut vivre en haut de la montagne, sans savoir que le vrai bonheur se trouve dans la maniĂšre d'y arriver. J'ai appris que lorsqu'un nouveau-nĂ© serre pour la premiĂšre fois, le doigt de son pĂšre, avec son petit poing, il le tient pour toujours. J'ai appris qu'un homme doit uniquement baisser le regard pour aider un de ses semblables Ă  se relever. J'ai appris tant de choses de vous, mais Ă  la vĂ©ritĂ© cela ne me servira pas Ă  grand chose, si cela devait rester en moi, c'est que malheureusement je serais en train de mourir. Dis toujours ce que tu ressens et fais toujours ce que tu penses. Si je savais que c'est peut ĂȘtre aujourd'hui la derniĂšre fois que je te vois dormir, je t'embrasserais trĂšs fort et je prierais pour pouvoir ĂȘtre le gardien de ton Ăąme. Si je savais que ce sont les derniers moments oĂč je te vois, je te dirais 'je t'aime' sans stupidement penser que tu le sais dĂ©jĂ . Il y a toujours un lendemain et la vie nous donne souvent une autre possibilitĂ© pour faire les choses bien, mais au cas oĂč elle se tromperait et c'est, si c'est tout ce qui nous reste, je voudrais te dire combien je t'aime, que jamais je ne t'oublierais. Le lendemain n'est sĂ»r pour personne, ni pour les jeunes ni pour les vieux. C'est peut ĂȘtre aujourd'hui que tu vois pour la derniĂšre fois ceux que tu aimes. Pour cela, n'attends pas, ne perds pas de temps, fais-le aujourd'hui, car peut ĂȘtre demain ne viendra jamais, tu regretteras toujours de n'avoir pas pris le temps pour un sourire, une embrassade, un baiser parce que tu Ă©tais trop occupĂ© pour accĂ©der Ă  un de leur dernier dĂ©sir. Garde ceux que tu aimes prĂšs de toi, dis-leur Ă  l'oreille combien tu as besoin d'eux, aime les et traite les bien, prends le temps pour leur dire 'je regrette' 'pardonne-moi' 's'il te plait' 'merci' et tous les mots d'amour que tu connais. Personne ne se souviendra de toi pour tes pensĂ©es secrĂštes. Demande la force et la sagesse pour les exprimer. Dis Ă  tes amis et Ă  ceux que tu aimes combien ils sont importants pour toi. Monsieur MĂĄrquez a terminĂ©, disant : Envoie cette lettre Ă  tous ceux que tu aimes, si tu ne le fais pas, demain sera comme aujourd'hui. Et si tu ne le fais pas cela n'a pas d'importance. Le moment sera passĂ©. Je vous dis au revoir avec beaucoup de tendresse »
”
”
Gabriel GarcĂ­a MĂĄrquez
“
1.​YOUR LOVE RELATIONSHIP. This is the measure of how happy you are in your current state of relationship—whether you’re single and loving it, in a relationship, or desiring one. 2.​YOUR FRIENDSHIPS. This is the measure of how strong a support network you have. Do you have at least five people who you know have your back and whom you love being around? 3.​YOUR ADVENTURES. How much time do you get to travel, experience the world, and do things that open you to new experiences and excitement? 4.​YOUR ENVIRONMENT. This is the quality of your home, your car, your work, and in general the spaces where you spend your time—even when traveling. 5.​YOUR HEALTH AND FITNESS. How would you rate your health, given your age, and any physical conditions? 6.​YOUR INTELLECTUAL LIFE. How much and how fast are you growing and learning? How many books do you read? How many seminars or courses do you take yearly? Education should not stop after you graduate from college. 7.​YOUR SKILLS. How fast are you improving the skills you have that make you unique and help you build a successful career? Are you growing toward mastery or are you stagnating? 8.​YOUR SPIRITUAL LIFE. How much time do you devote to spiritual, meditative, or contemplative practices that keep you feeling connected, balanced, and peaceful? 9.​YOUR CAREER. Are you growing, climbing the ladder, and excelling? Or do you feel you’re stuck in a rut? If you have a business, is it thriving or stagnating? 10.​YOUR CREATIVE LIFE. Do you paint, write, play musical instruments, or engage in any other activity that helps you channel your creativity? Or are you more of a consumer than a creator? 11.​YOUR FAMILY LIFE. Do you love coming home to your family after a hard day’s work? If you’re not married or a parent, define your family as your parents and siblings. 12.​YOUR COMMUNITY LIFE. Are you giving, contributing, and playing a definite role in your community?
”
”
Vishen Lakhiani (The Code of the Extraordinary Mind: 10 Unconventional Laws to Redefine Your Life and Succeed On Your Own Terms)
“
The Directorio Revolucionario (“DR”) existed during the mid-1950’s and it was a Cuban University students’ group in opposition to the dictator President Fulgencio Batista. It was one of the most active terrorist organizations in Havana. Although they were given orders not to attack the rank and file police officers, semantics became important, as their targets were no longer “assassinated,” but rather were “executed.” To them the term sounded more legally acceptable. However, regardless of how it is phrased, murder is murder! At 3:20 on the afternoon of March 13, 1957, fifty attackers from the “DR”, led by Carlos GutiĂ©rrez Menoyo, attacked the Presidential Palace. Menoyo had fought in the Sahara Desert against the German forces under General Rommel during World War II. By demonstrating great courage, Carlos had been decorated and given the rank of second lieutenant in the French army and was uniquely suited for this task. Now, with workers representing labor, and rebellious students from the university, they drove up to the entrance to the Presidential Palace in delivery van #7, marked “Fast Delivery S.A.” They also had two additional cars weighted down with bombs, rifles, and automatic weapons
 (Read more in the Exciting Story of Cuba)
”
”
Hank Bracker
“
Il est donc nĂ©cessaire que les uns et les autres se mettent eux-mĂȘmes Ă  l'Ă©preuve, les uns pour savoir s'ils sont dignes de prĂȘcher et de laisser des Ă©crits ; les autres pour savoir s'ils sont dignes d'Ă©couter et de lire. C'est ainsi qu'aprĂšs avoir, selon la coutume, rompu le pain de l'Eucharistie, on permet Ă  chaque fidĂšle d'en prendre une part; car, pour choisir ou pour rejeter avec raison, la conscience est le meilleur juge. Or, la rĂšgle certaine d'une bonne conscience est une vie droite, jointe Ă  une saine doctrine : suivre l'exemple de ceux qui ont Ă©tĂ© dĂ©jĂ  Ă©prouvĂ©s, et qui se sont conduits avec droiture, c'est la voie la plus sĂ»re pour atteindre Ă  l'intelligence de la vĂ©ritĂ©, et Ă  l'observance des prĂ©ceptes. Quiconque mangera le pain et boira le calice du Seigneur indignement, se rendra coupable du corps et du sang du Seigneur. Que l'homme donc s'Ă©prouve soi-mĂȘme, et qu'aprĂšs cela il mange de ce pain et boive de cette coupe. Il faut donc que celui qui entreprend de prĂȘcher aux autres s'examine pour savoir s'il a en vue l'utilitĂ© du prochain; si ce n'est point avec prĂ©somption, et par esprit de rivalitĂ© ou par amour de la gloire, qu'il rĂ©pand la sainte parole ; s'il se propose pour unique rĂ©compense le salut de ses auditeurs, et s'il n'en flatte aucun ; et enfin s'il Ă©vite toute occasion qui pourrait le faire accuser de vĂ©nalitĂ©.
”
”
Clement of Alexandria (Miscellanies (Stromata))
“
The engine is never your salary; the engine is the employer's pressing business needs. The next car back has your responsibilities that will address the company's needs and goals. The next car back is filled with your differentiators that address the employer's pressing business needs. The next car back might be a bet on how your unique capabilities will address the company's needs and the performance that you will achieve. The next car back is filled with other differentiators and additional Storytelling Issues. The caboose is your salary and annual bonus. The caboose is always attached to the train and rides along, but it comes at the end of the discussion, not the beginning of the conversation.
”
”
Victoria Medvec (Negotiate Without Fear: Strategies and Tools to Maximize Your Outcomes)
“
Khrushchev and Ulbricht attempted to save face by holding their own high-profile meeting in East Berlin a few days later, and uniquely, Michael Howard, having witnessed Kennedy’s historic speech at the Rathaus Schönberg, now watched the Communist response. “I went over with a couple of my colleagues to the East to listen to Nikita Khrushchev speak in East Berlin. He turned up with Walter Ulbricht in an open car. It was a very heavy day—quite an ominous portent. And there were quite big crowds, which had fairly obviously been told to come along.
”
”
Iain MacGregor (Checkpoint Charlie: The Cold War, the Berlin Wall and the Most Dangerous Place on Earth)
“
AModernIndian.com is a great way to see whether the products are worth buying before you invest your money or time. This website offers reviews of all types of products. They are aimed at the average person and not a technical level so everyone can understand them. Available on an assortment of devices including desktop, laptop and mobile. The site is constantly updated with new information so visitors are able to stay educated on topics they are interested in. AModernIndian.com covers many popular topics with in depth information, such as health and fitness, sports, travel, entertainment, cars and trucks, preschool toys, books and many more. AModernIndian.com is unique in its approach, because it provides both types of product reviews - where the editors actually purchase the product as well as research from professional review aggregators like Amazon, Flipkart etc. We provide Reviews, Ultimate Guides and Tips for most products.
”
”
A Modern Indian
“
Liane Flowers invites you to be impressed by a rich and colorful world of floral designs that combines uncompromising professionalism, high skill and a great love for flowers for one perfect bouquet. We provide a selection of unique bouquets for every occasion and every purpose and offer the best services in the field including luxury bouquet design at another level, bridal bouquet design, sweet bouquet design, car decoration, flower deliveries, stage arrangements for events (exclusive animal-shaped arrangements in Israel), Powers box in all styles Dreamy (we have over 2000 styles), and more. The uncompromising professionalism, the unique accessories combined in the flower designs and our high sense of service make the difference! Visit the Facebook page and be impressed and we will be happy to be at your service. Phone 077-210-3499
”
”
lianflowers
“
Death Games (a) Conceptual. Nader again. His assault on the automobile clearly had me worried. Living in grey England, what I most treasured of my Shanghai childhood were my memories of American cars, a passion I’ve retained to this day. Looking back, one can see that Nader was the first of the ecopuritans, who proliferate now, convinced that everything is bad for us. In fact, too few things are bad for us, and one fears an indefinite future of pious bourgeois certitudes. It’s curious that these puritans strike such a chord - there is a deep underlying unease about the rate of social change, but little apparent change is actually taking place. Most superficial change belongs in the context of the word ‘new’, as applied to refrigerator or lawn-mower design. Real change is largely invisible, as befits this age of invisible technology - and people have embraced VCRs, fax machines, word processors without a thought, along with the new social habits that have sprung up around them. They have also accepted the unique vocabulary and grammar of late-20th-century life (whose psychology I have tried to describe in the present book), though most would deny it vehemently if asked.
”
”
J.G. Ballard (The Atrocity Exhibition)
“
The constant background noise of car horns, barking dogs, music pulsating out of apartment windows—they had all blended together in a symphony of chaos that was the trademark of city life. Then there was the unique smell of the city. The air was permeated with a persistent odor of unwashed bodies and greasy food mixed with pungent drifts of vehicle exhaust and sewage. One couldn’t discount the more pleasant aromas that also drifted over the city of fresh-brewed coffee from a cafe or the sweet smell of relish from the corner hot dog stands. But
”
”
Regina Felty (While You Walked By)
“
I'm still trying to figure out how one finds room for a passionate love of not only chickens but also dollhouses. I've found that one all-consuming hobby is usually enough." Cedric grinned. "But regardless of how 'unique' this couple is, the wedding will be absolutely stunning, I assure you. And I'm sure you can handle it, Lottie." I was excited by the mere fact that he knew my name, let alone that he already seemed to trust me. But before I could say anything, he whipped the car across two lanes. "Thank God," Cedric said. "Next exit, there's a Chick-fil-A!" We both died laughing, and I realized this wacky wedding might have forged a bond between Cedric and me. If so, it might actually be, given the chicken of it all, worth the cuckoo.
”
”
Mary Hollis Huddleston (Without a Hitch)
“
Car la nature humaine est ainsi faite, que les peines et les souffrances éprouvées simultanément ne s'additionnent pas totalement dans notre sensibilité, mais se dissimulent les unes derriÚres les autres par ordre de grandeur décroissante selon les lois bien connues de la perspective. Mécanisme bien providentiel qui rend possible notre vie au camp. Voilà pourquoi on entend dire si souvent dans la vie courante que l'homme est peréptuellement insatisfait : en réalité bien plus que l'incapacité de l'homme à atteindre à la sérénité absolue, cette opinion révÚle combien nous connaissons mal la nature complexe de l'état de malheur, et combien nous nous trompons en donnant à des causes multiples et hiérarchiquement subordonnées le nom unique de la cause principale.
”
”
Primo Levi (If This Is a Man ‱ The Truce)
“
Car la nature humaine est ainsi faite, que les peines et les souffrances Ă©prouvĂ©es simultanĂ©ment ne s'additionnent pas totalement dans notre sensibilitĂ©, mais se dissimulent les unes derriĂšres les autres par ordre de grandeur dĂ©croissante selon les lois bien connues de la perspective. MĂ©canisme bien providentiel qui rend possible notre vie au camp. VoilĂ  pourquoi on entend dire si souvent dans la vie courante que l'homme est perĂ©ptuellement insatisfait : en rĂ©alitĂ© bien plus que l'incapacitĂ© de l'homme Ă  atteindre Ă  la sĂ©rĂ©nitĂ© absolue, cette opinion rĂ©vĂšle combien nous connaissons mal la nature complexe de l'Ă©tat de malheur, et combien nous nous trompons en donnant Ă  des causes multiples et hiĂ©rarchiquement subordonnĂ©es le nom unique de la cause principale ; jusqu'au moment oĂč, celle-ci venant Ă  disparaĂźtre, nous dĂ©couvrons avec une douloureuse surprise que derriĂšre elle il y en a une autre, et mĂȘme tout une sĂ©rie d'autre.
”
”
Primo Levi (If This Is a Man ‱ The Truce)
“
MITI, far from being a uniquely brilliant leader of government/industrial partnership, has been wrong so often that the Japanese themselves will concede that much of their growth derives from industry's rejection of MITI’s guidance. MITI, incredibly, opposed the development of the very areas where Japan has been successful: cars, electronics and cameras. MITI has, moreover, poured vast funds into desperately wasteful projects. Thanks to MITI, Japan has a huge overcapacity in steel - no less than three times the national requirement. This, probably the most expensive mistake Japan ever made in peacetime, was a mistake of genius, because Japan has no natural resources: it has to import everything; the iron ore, the coal, the gas, the limestone and the oil to make its unwanted steel. Undaunted, MITI then invested in giant, loss-making (£400 million losses by 1992) 5th generation supercomputers at the precise moment that the market opened for the small personal computer; and MITI' s attempts at dominating the world's pharmaceutical and telecommunications industries have each failed. Nor is this just anecdote. In a meticulous study of MITI’s interventions into the Japanese economy between 1955 and 1990, Richard Beason of Alberta University and David Weinterin of Harvard showed that, across the 13 major sectors of the economy, surveying hundreds of different companies, Japan's bureaucrats almost invariably picked and supported the losers.
”
”
Terence Kealey (The Economic Laws of Scientific Research)
“
HĂ©las ! Ton intĂ©rĂȘt ici me dĂ©sespĂšre. Si quelque autre malheur m’avait ravi mon pĂšre, Mon Ăąme aurait trouvĂ© dans le bien de te voir L’unique allĂšgement qu’elle eĂ»t pu recevoir ; Et contre ma douleur j’aurais senti des charmes, Quand une main si chĂšre eĂ»t essuyĂ© mes larmes. Mais il me faut te perdre aprĂšs l’avoir perdu ; Cet effort sur ma flamme Ă  mon honneur est dĂ» ; Et cet affreux devoir, dont l’ordre m’assassine, Me force Ă  travailler moi-mĂȘme Ă  ta ruine. Car enfin n’attends pas de mon affection De lĂąches sentiments pour ta punition. De quoi qu’en ta faveur notre amour m’entretienne, Ma gĂ©nĂ©rositĂ© doit rĂ©pondre Ă  la tienne : Tu t’es, en m’offensant, montrĂ© digne de moi ; Je me dois, par ta mort, montrer digne de toi.
”
”
Pierre Corneille (Le Cid)
“
The Sayanim: Mossad’s International Volunteers by Michael Ellmer April 16, 2021 In the Hebrew language, Sayanim translates to mean “helpers” or “assistants”. In the Mossad, the Sayanim are a volunteer network of Jews across the world who are loyal to the nation of Israel and willing to help the agency in their global mission. According to a comparative study of HUMINT in counterterrorism between Israel and France, Amy Kirchheimer writes that Israel has “the challenge of collecting intelligence on a vast array of targets with a comparatively small number of intelligence officers, and the Sayanim network helped the Mossad Katsas (case officers) somewhat lessen this problem.” According to Gordon Thomas in his book Gideon’s Spies: Mossad’s Secret Warriors, the Sayanim were a creation of Mier Amit, the Chief Director of the Mossad from 1963-1968. Thomas writes, “Each Sayan was an example of historical cohesiveness of the world Jewish community. Regardless of allegiance to his or her country, in the final analysis, a Sayan would recognize a greater loyalty: the mystical one to Israel, and a need to help protect it from its enemies”. The loyalty of the Sayanim is what fuels their mission and none reside on a Mossad payroll. The flexibility and diversity in their roles give the Mossad a unique operational capability with increased protection from detection and a way to avoid budget restraints or accountability. Most Sayanim fulfil various roles that can themselves be used to support Mossad operations. For example, Thomas writes, “A car Sayan, running a rental agency, provided a Katsa with a vehicle without the usual documentation. A letting agency Sayan offered accommodation. A bank Sayan might unlock funds outside normal hours. A Sayan physician would give medical assistance – treating a bullet wound for example – without informing the authorities”.
”
”
Michael Ellmer
“
Les Ă©conomistes les plus coriaces se sont cassĂ© les dents – mĂȘme celles qui sont en or – sur l'Ă©pineuse question de la vie financiĂšre Ă  Montaubout. Le premier os Ă  ronger (non des moindres), demeure celui de la monnaie. Madame la PrĂ©sidente a refusĂ© de plier Ă  la dure loi de la soumission aux monnaies existantes : dollar, livre sterling, euro, franc CFA
 Les autoritĂ©s Ă©conomiques internationales ont toute reçu la mĂȘme rĂ©ponse d'une clartĂ© aveuglante : « Inutile d'avoir une monnaie unique, car elles sont toutes iniques. » L'emploi de ce mot peu usitĂ© est d'abord passĂ© pour une coquille journalistique ; puis pour une coquetterie langagiĂšre de madame la PrĂ©sidente voulant exposer sa parfaite maĂźtrise de la langue française, mais au final, il s'est avĂ©rĂ© que ce n'Ă©tait ni l'un, ni l'autre, mais bel et bien un choix politique et Ă©conomique fort. (p. 35)
”
”
Thierry Moral (DerniĂšres nouvelles de Montaubout)
“
RÉPONSES INTERROGATIVES À UNE QUESTION DE MARTIN HEIDEGGER La poĂ©sie ne rythmera plus l'action. Elle sera en avant. RIMBAUD. Divers sens Ă©troits pourraient ĂȘtre proposĂ©s, compte non tenu du sens qui se crĂ©e dans le mouvement mĂȘme de toute poĂ©sie objective, toujours en chemin vers le point qui signe sa justification et clĂŽt son existence, Ă  l'Ă©cart, en avant de l'existence du mot Dieu : -La poĂ©sie entraĂźnera Ă  vue l'action, se plaçant en avant d'elle. L'en-avant suppose toutefois un alignement d'angle de la poĂ©sie sur l'action, comme un vĂ©hicule pilote aspire Ă  courte distance par sa vitesse un second vĂ©hicule qui le suit. Il lui ouvre la voie, contient sa dispersion, le nourrit de sa lancĂ©e. -La poĂ©sie, sur-cerveau de l’action, telle la pensĂ©e qui commande au corps de l'univers, comme l'imagination visionnaire fournit l'image de ce qui sera Ă  l'esprit forgeur qui la sollicite. De lĂ , l'enavant. -La poĂ©sie sera « un chant de dĂ©part ». PoĂ©sie et action, vases obstinĂ©ment communicants. La poĂ©sie, pointe de flĂšche supposant l'arc action, l'objet sujet Ă©troitement dĂ©pendant, la flĂšche Ă©tant projetĂ©e au loin et ne retombant pas car l'arc qui la suit la ressaisira avant chute, les deux Ă©gaux bien qu'inĂ©gaux, dans un double et unique mouvement de rejonction. -L'action accompagnera la poĂ©sie par une admirable fatalitĂ©, la rĂ©fraction de la seconde dans le miroir brĂ»lant et brouillĂ© de la premiĂšre produisant une contradiction et communiquant le signe plus (+) Ă  la matiĂšre abrupte de l’action. -La poĂ©sie, du fait de la parole mĂȘme, est toujours mise par la pensĂ©e en avant de l'agir dont elle emmĂšne le contenu imparfait en une course perpĂ©tuelle vie-mort-vie. -L'action est aveugle, c'est la poĂ©sie qui voit. L'une est unie par un lien mĂšre-fils Ă  1'autre, le fils en avant de la mĂšre et la guidant par nĂ©cessitĂ© plus que par amour. -La libre dĂ©termination de la poĂ©sie semble lui confĂ©rer sa qualitĂ© conductrice. Elle serait un ĂȘtre action, en avant de Faction. -La poĂ©sie est la loi, l'action demeure le phĂ©nomĂšne. L'Ă©clair prĂ©cĂšde le tonnerre, illuminant de haut en bas son thĂ©Ăątre, lui donnant valeur instantanĂ©e. -La poĂ©sie est le mouvement pur ordonnant le mouvement gĂ©nĂ©ral. Elle enseigne le pays en se dĂ©calant. -La poĂ©sie ne rythme plus l'action, elle se porte en avant pour lui indiquer le chemin mobile. C'est pourquoi la poĂ©sie touche la premiĂšre. Elle songe l'action et, grĂące Ă  son matĂ©riau, construit la Maison, mais jamais une fois pour toutes. _ La poĂ©sie est le moi en avant de l'en soi, « le poĂšte Ă©tant chargĂ© de l'HumanitĂ© » (Rimbaud). - La poĂ©sie serait de « la pensĂ©e chantĂ©e ». Elle serait l'Ɠuvre en avant de Faction, serait sa consĂ©quence finale et dĂ©tachĂ©e. -La poĂ©sie est une tĂȘte chercheuse. L'action est son corps. Accomplissant une rĂ©volution ils font, au terme de celle-ci, coĂŻncider la fin et le commencement. Ainsi de suite selon le cercle. -Dans l'optique de Rimbaud et de la Commune, la poĂ©sie ne servira plus la bourgeoisie, ne la rythmera plus. Elle sera en avant, la bourgeoisie ici supposĂ©e action de conquĂȘte. La poĂ©sie sera alors sa propre maĂźtresse, Ă©tant maĂźtresse de sa rĂ©volution; le signal du dĂ©part donnĂ©, l'action en-vue-de se transformant sans cesse en action voyant.
”
”
René Char (Recherche de la base et du sommet)
“
They shared about the beautiful and unique plans that God has for each individual. Up until recently, I hadn’t had many hopes or plans. My life had been like a car stuck in a snowy ditch in the middle of the night. I knew I was stuck, but I didn’t know how to get out of it. When these guys came along, they had a tow truck, chains, and a spotlight that shed light on all the problem areas. They didn’t make me feel guilty about my problems; instead, they jumped out into the cold and helped me start digging. Not only that, but they were teaching me to see the hopes and plans that God had for others, they were teaching me to jump out in the snow and start digging as well.
”
”
Michael J Heil (Pursued: God’s relentless pursuit and a drug addict’s journey to finding purpose)
“
For many victims of motor vehicle collisions, the decision whether to pursue an insurance claim or handle their own case can be a difficult one. However, there are numerous reasons why victims of accidents should be represented by a lawyer if they have received a substantial injury such as whiplash. A Car Accident Lawyer Will Explain The Process to You When they hire a car accident lawyer, victims of accidents will immediately receive the assistance and attention they need and deserve. Because most of the details of how car accidents occur are unique and not common knowledge, knowing how to proceed will be the major difference in the outcome of the case. A lawyer who is familiar with how insurance companies operate will know how to negotiate a better settlement with them. During an accident, most insurance companies will want to pay the least amount possible and move on, not even addressing the extent of the damage to the other car or some of the details of the accident. When victims have a lawyer involved, they will not be vulnerable to these tactics.
”
”
The Echavarria Law Firm
“
We seek a private house, a private means of transportation, a private garden, a private laundry, self-service stores, do-it-yourself skills of every kind. An enormous technology seems to have set itself the task of making it unnecessary for one human being ever to ask anything of another in the course of going about his or her daily business. Even within the family Americans are unique in their feeling that each member should have a separate room and even a separate telephone, television, and car, when economically possible. We seek more and more privacy, and feel more and more alienated and lonely when we get it.
”
”
Leslie Verner (Invited: The Power of Hospitality in an Age of Loneliness)