Unique Car Quotes

We've searched our database for all the quotes and captions related to Unique Car. Here they are! All 100 of them:

“
Colin's skin was alive with the feeling of connection to everyone in that car and everyone not in it. And he was feeling not-unique in the very best possible way.
”
”
John Green (An Abundance of Katherines)
“
The second thing you have to do to be a writer is to keep on writing. Don't listen to people who tell you that very few people get published and you won't be one of them. Don't listen to your friend who says you are better that Tolkien and don't have to try any more. Keep writing, keep faith in the idea that you have unique stories to tell, and tell them. I meet far too many people who are going to be writers 'someday.' When they are out of high school, when they've finished college, after the wedding, when the kids are older, after I retire . . . That is such a trap You will never have any more free time than you do right now. So, whether you are 12 or 70, you should sit down today and start being a writer if that is what you want to do. You might have to write on a notebook while your kids are playing on the swings or write in your car on your coffee break. That's okay. I think we've all 'been there, done that.' It all starts with the writing.
”
”
Robin Hobb
“
But...surely you know where your nephew is going?' she asked, looking bewildered. 'Certainly we know,' said Vernon Dursley. 'He's off with some of your lot, isn't he? Right, Dudley, let's get in the car, you heard the man, we're in a hurry.' Again, Vernon Dursley marched as far as the front door, but Dudley did not follow. 'Off with some of our lot?' Hestia looked outraged. Harry had met the attitude before: witches and wizards seemed stunned that his closest living family took so little interest in the famous Harry Potter. 'It's fine,' Harry assured her. 'It doesn't matter, honestly.' 'Doesn't matter?' repeated Hestia, her voice rising ominously. 'Don't these people realise what you've been through? What danger you are in? The unique position you hold in the hearts of the anti-Voldemort movement? 'Er - no, they don't,' said Harry. 'They think I'm a waste of space, actually, but I'm used to -' 'I don't think you're a waste of space.' If Harry had not seen Dudley's lips move, he might not have believed it.
”
”
J.K. Rowling (Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Harry Potter, #7))
“
There is always a unique atmosphere in the car when you drive through the City with a dead body in the back.
”
”
Steen Langstrup (In The Shadow of Sadd)
“
My mental illness is not your mental illness. Even if we have the exact same diagnosis we will likely experience it in profoundly different ways. This book is my unique perspective on my personal path so far. It is not a textbook. If it were it would probably cost a lot more money and have significantly less profanity or stories about strangers sending you unexpected vaginas in the mail. As it is with all stories, fast cars, wild bears, mental illness, and even life, only one truth remains: your mileage may vary.
”
”
Jenny Lawson (Furiously Happy: A Funny Book About Horrible Things)
“
Even in the era of AIDS, sex raises no unique moral issues at all. Decisions about sex may involve considerations about honesty, concern for others, prudence, and so on, but there is nothing special about sex in this respect, for the same could be said of decisions about driving a car. (In fact, the moral issues raised by driving a car, both from an environmental and from a safety point of view, are much more serious than those raised by sex.)
”
”
Peter Singer
“
Le coucher de soleil, le printemps, le bleu de la mer, les Ă©toiles de la nuit, toutes ces choses que nous disons captivantes n’ont de magie que lorsqu’elles gravitent autour d’une femme, mon garçon
 Car la BeautĂ©, la vraie, l’ unique, la beautĂ© phare, la beautĂ© absolue, c ’est la femme. Le reste, tout le reste n ’est qu ’accessoires de charme.
”
”
Yasmina Khadra
“
In addition to conformity as a way to relieve the anxiety springing from separateness, another factor of contemporary life must be considered: the role of the work routine and the pleasure routine. Man becomes a 'nine to fiver', he is part of the labour force, or the bureaucratic force of clerks and managers. He has little initiative, his tasks are prescribed by the organisation of the work; there is even little difference between those high up on the ladder and those on the bottom. They all perform tasks prescribed by the whole structure of the organisation, at a prescribed speed, and in a prescribed manner. Even the feelings are prescribed: cheerfulness, tolerance, reliability, ambition, and an ability to get along with everybody without friction. Fun is routinised in similar, although not quite as drastic ways. Books are selected by the book clubs, movies by the film and theatre owners and the advertising slogans paid for by them; the rest is also uniform: the Sunday ride in the car, the television session, the card game, the social parties. From birth to death, from Monday to Monday, from morning to evening - all activities are routinised, and prefabricated. How should a man caught up in this net of routine not forget that he is a man, a unique individual, one who is given only this one chance of living, with hopes and disappointments, with sorrow and fear, with the longing for love and the dread of the nothing and separateness?
”
”
Erich Fromm (The Art of Loving)
“
You go into extinction by being obsessed about becoming something else and then travelling in the wrong car while your real self keeps waiting at the bus stop for your unfulfilled return!
”
”
Israelmore Ayivor (Shaping the dream)
“
So much rubbish; ... from heavy plant machinery, cars, vans, buses to plastic bottles, magazines, papers, tins, boxes, bags, clothes... ... it is how they have been collected here that is odd... everything neat, clean, ordered and possibly even categorised...
”
”
Trevor Alan Foris (The Octunnumi Fosbit Files Prologue)
“
The lead car is absolutely unique, except for the one behind it which is identical.
”
”
Murray Walker
“
It is an eccentric and uniquely human approach to resources: like plowing under your farmland to make way for more lawns, or compromising your air quality in exchange for an enormous car.
”
”
John Vaillant (The Golden Spruce: A True Story of Myth, Madness, and Greed)
“
Do you want any breakfast, Sam?” my mom asks. I never eat breakfast at home, but my mom still asks me every day—when she catches me before I duck out, anyway—and in that moment I realize how much I love the little everyday routines of my life: the fact that she always asks, the fact that I always say no because there’s a sesame bagel waiting for me in Lindsay’s car, the fact that we always listen to “No More Drama” as we pull into the parking lot. The fact that my mom always cooks spaghetti and meatballs on Sunday, and the fact that once a month my dad takes over the kitchen and makes his “special stew” which is just hot-dog pieces and baked beans and lots of extra ketchup and molasses, and I would never admit to liking it, but it’s actually one of my favorite meals. The details that are my life’s special pattern, like how in handwoven rugs what really makes them unique are the tiny flaws in the stitching, little gaps and jumps and stutters that can never be reproduced.
”
”
Lauren Oliver (Before I Fall)
“
books are a uniquely portable magic. I usually listen to one in the car (always unabridged; I think abridged audiobooks are the pits), and carry another wherever I go.
”
”
Stephen King (On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft)
“
Frankly, accepting the family's unique qualities has done wonders to help my own sanity.
”
”
Carly Philips (Summer Lovin' (Costas Sisters, #2))
“
There is nothing unique or special in a near-death experience. They are not rare; everyone, I would venture, has had them, at one time or another, perhaps without even realising it. The brush of a van too close to your bicycle, the tired medic who realises that a dosage ought to be checked one final time, the driver who has drunk too much and is reluctantly persuaded to relinquish the car keys, the train missed after sleeping through an alarm, the aeroplane not caught, the virus never inhaled, the assailant never encountered, the path not taken.
”
”
Maggie O'Farrell (I Am, I Am, I Am: Seventeen Brushes With Death)
“
people today have less of an idea than ever before what a really living person is; in fact, human beings, each one of whom is a priceless, unique experiment of nature, are being shot to death in car-loads.
”
”
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
“
When Ronan was young and didn’t know any better, he thought everyone was like him. He made rules for humanity based upon observation, his idea of the truth only as broad as his world was. Everyone must sleep and eat. Everyone has hands, feet. Everyone’s skin is sensitive; no one’s hair is. Everyone whispers to hide and shouts to be heard. Everyone has pale skin and blue eyes, every man has long dark hair, every woman has long golden hair. Every child knows the stories of Irish heroes, every mother knows songs about weaver women and lonely boatmen. Every house is surrounded by secret fields and ancient barns, every pasture is watched by blue mountains, every narrow drive leads to a hidden world. Everyone sometimes wakes with their dreams still gripped in their hands. Then he crept out of childhood, and suddenly the uniqueness of experience unveiled itself. Not all fathers are wild, charming schemers, wiry, far-eyed gods; and not all mothers are dulcet, soft-spoken friends, patient as buds in spring. There are people who don’t care about cars and there are people who like to live in cities. Some families do not have older and younger brothers; some families don’t have brothers at all. Most men do not go to Mass every Sunday and most men do not fall in love with other men. And no one brings dreams to life. No one brings dreams to life. No one brings dreams to life.
”
”
Maggie Stiefvater (Call Down the Hawk (Dreamer Trilogy, #1))
“
Dieu c'est l'essence mĂȘme, tandis qu'Édouard n'a jamais rien trouvĂ© d'essentiel ni dans ses amours, ni dans son mĂ©tier, ni dans ses idĂ©es. Il est trop honnĂȘte pour admettre qu'il trouve l'essentiel dans l'inessentiel, mais il est trop faible pour ne pas dĂ©sirer secrĂštement l'essentiel. Ah, mesdames et messieurs, comme il est triste de vivre quand on ne peut rein prendre au sĂ©rieux, rien ni personne ! C'est pourquoi Edouard Ă©prouve le dĂ©sir de Dieu, car seul Dieu est dispensĂ© de l'obligation de paraĂźtre et peut se contenter d'ĂȘtre ; car lui seul constitue (lui seul, unique et non existant) l'antithĂšse essentielle de ce monde d'autant plus existant qu'il est inessentiel.
”
”
Milan Kundera (Laughable Loves)
“
L'homme lutte contre la peur mais, contrairement Ă  ce qu'on rĂ©pĂšte toujours, cette peur n'est pas celle de la mort, car la peur de la mort, tout le monde ne l'Ă©prouve pas, certains n'ayant aucune imagination, d'autres se croyant immortels, d'autres encore espĂ©rant des rencontres merveilleuses aprĂšs leur trĂ©pas ; la seule peur universelle, la peur unique, celle qui conduit toutes nos pensĂ©es, car la peur de n'ĂȘtre rien. Parce que chaque individu a Ă©prouvĂ© ceci, ne fĂ»t-ce qu'une seconde au cours d'une journĂ©e : se rendre compte que, par nature, ne lui appartient aucune des identitĂ©s qui le dĂ©finissent, qu'il aurait pu ne pas ĂȘtre dotĂ© de ce qui le caractĂ©rise, qu'il s'en est fallu d'un cheveu qu'il naisse ailleurs, apprenne une autre langue, reçoive une Ă©ducation religieuse diffĂ©rente, qu'on l'Ă©lĂšve dans une autre culture, qu'on l'instruise dans une autre idĂ©ologie, avec d'autres parents, d'autres tuteurs, d'autres modĂšles. Vertige !
”
”
Éric-Emmanuel Schmitt
“
Le livre, comme livre, appartient Ă  l'auteur, mais comme pensĂ©e, il appartient -le mot n'est pas trop vaste- au genre humain. Toutes les intelligences y ont droit. Si l'un des deux droits, le droit de l'Ă©crivain et le droit de l'esprit humain, devait ĂȘtre sacrifiĂ©, ce serait, certes, le droit de l'Ă©crivain, car l'intĂ©rĂȘt public est notre prĂ©occupation unique, et tous, je le dĂ©clare, doivent passer avant nous.
”
”
Victor Hugo
“
You hear it in every political speech, “vote for me, we’ll get the dream back.” They all reiterate it in similar words—you even hear it from people who are destroying the dream, whether they know it or not. But the “dream” has to be sustained, otherwise how are you going to get people in the richest, most powerful country in world history, with extraordinary advantages, to face the reality that they see around them? Inequality is really unprecedented. If you look at total inequality today, it’s like the worst periods of American history. But if you refine it more closely, the inequality comes from the extreme wealth in a tiny sector of the population, a fraction of 1 percent. There were periods like the Gilded Age in the 1890s and the Roaring Twenties and so on, when a situation developed rather similar to this, but the current period is extreme. Because if you look at the wealth distribution, the inequality mostly comes from super-wealth—literally, the top one-tenth of a percent are just super-wealthy. This is the result of over thirty years of a shift in social and economic policy. If you check you find that over the course of these years the government policy has been modified completely against the will of the population to provide enormous benefits to the very rich. And for most of the population, the majority, real incomes have almost stagnated for over thirty years. The middle class in that sense, that unique American sense, is under severe attack. A significant part of the American Dream is class mobility: You’re born poor, you work hard, you get rich. The idea that it is possible for everyone to get a decent job, buy a home, get a car, have their children go to school . . . It’s all collapsed.
”
”
Noam Chomsky (Requiem for the American Dream: The 10 Principles of Concentration of Wealth & Power)
“
Does everyone from England go to sleep the minute you load them into a car, or is that something that’s uniquely you?
”
”
Mira Grant (How Green This Land, How Blue This Sea (Newsflesh, #3.2))
“
Cette petite religion possÚde un caractÚre unique : les deux membres du couple en incarnent tous les deux l'idéal. Le droit de propriété sur le corps de son partenaire, protégé par une défense rituelle trÚs forte, se place au centre de cette mini-religion. Car n'importe quel type d'écart sexuel hors du couple fait naßtre chez l'autre un intense sentiment de colÚre.
”
”
Liv Strömquist (Prins Charles kÀnsla)
“
Ireland, like Ukraine, is a largely rural country which suffers from its proximity to a more powerful industrialised neighbour. Ireland’s contribution to the history of tractors is the genius engineer Harry Ferguson, who was born in 1884, near Belfast. Ferguson was a clever and mischievous man, who also had a passion for aviation. It is said that he was the first man in Great Britain to build and fly his own aircraft in 1909. But he soon came to believe that improving efficiency of food production would be his unique service to mankind. Harry Ferguson’s first two-furrow plough was attached to the chassis of the Ford Model T car converted into a tractor, aptly named Eros. This plough was mounted on the rear of the tractor, and through ingenious use of balance springs it could be raised or lowered by the driver using a lever beside his seat. Ford, meanwhile, was developing its own tractors. The Ferguson design was more advanced, and made use of hydraulic linkage, but Ferguson knew that despite his engineering genius, he could not achieve his dream on his own. He needed a larger company to produce his design. So he made an informal agreement with Henry Ford, sealed only by a handshake. This Ford-Ferguson partnership gave to the world a new type of Fordson tractor far superior to any that had been known before, and the precursor of all modern-type tractors. However, this agreement by a handshake collapsed in 1947 when Henry Ford II took over the empire of his father, and started to produce a new Ford 8N tractor, using the Ferguson system. Ferguson’s open and cheerful nature was no match for the ruthless mentality of the American businessman. The matter was decided in court in 1951. Ferguson claimed $240 million, but was awarded only $9.25 million. Undaunted in spirit, Ferguson had a new idea. He approached the Standard Motor Company at Coventry with a plan, to adapt the Vanguard car for use as tractor. But this design had to be modified, because petrol was still rationed in the post-war period. The biggest challenge for Ferguson was the move from petrol-driven to diesel-driven engines and his success gave rise to the famous TE-20, of which more than half a million were built in the UK. Ferguson will be remembered for bringing together two great engineering stories of our time, the tractor and the family car, agriculture and transport, both of which have contributed so richly to the well-being of mankind.
”
”
Marina Lewycka (A Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian)
“
J'ai toujours pris un plaisir extrĂȘme Ă  penser, sans trop me soucier du tracĂ© de la frontiĂšre entre l'imagination et la certitude. L'intĂ©rieur de ma tĂȘte comme un bordel dont je serai l'unique client d'un soir, l'habituĂ© occasionnel. Pas si seul, car les pensĂ©es pensionnaires viennent au-devant de mes dĂ©sirs : les nobles, cendrĂ©es et hautaines, les belles, toutes nues mais poudrĂ©es, les ingĂ©nues, les petites, les perverses, les noires, les folles, les honteuses. Et les vulgaires, et les trĂšs vulgaires, champagne, Ă©chancrure et langues qui s'agitent. "Mes pensĂ©es ce sont mes catins", comme c'est exact. Luxure mentale. Dehors, le froid. Et les autres, tous les autres, se tiennent dans ce froid. Proches et lointains. Et je les regarde, jumelles, fenĂȘtres sur cou. Nous communiquons par interphones et rĂ©pondeurs.
”
”
Pierre PĂ©ju (La Vie courante)
“
It has occurred to me that I should try and view in a similar spirit something which, over these three weeks I have been here in Shanghai, has come to be a perennial source of irritation: namely, the way people here seem determined at every opportunity to block one’s view. No sooner has one entered a room or stepped out from a car than someone or other will have smilingly placed himself right within one’s line of vision, preventing the most basic perusal of one’s surroundings. Often as not, the offending person is one’s very host or guide of that moment; but should there be any lapse in this quarter, there is never a shortage of bystanders eager to make good the shortcoming. As far as I can ascertain, all the national groups that make up the community here—English, Chinese, French, American, Japanese, Russian—subscribe to this practice with equal zeal, and the inescapable conclusion is that this custom is one that has grown up uniquely here within Shanghai’s International Settlement, cutting across all barriers of race and class.
”
”
Kazuo Ishiguro (When We Were Orphans)
“
Grief, like death, is banal and unique. So, a banal comparison. When you change your make of car, you suddenly notice how many other cars of the same sort there are on the road. They register in a way they never did before. When you are widowed, you suddenly notice all the widows and widowers coming towards you. Before, they had been more or less invisible, and they continue to remain so to the other drivers, to the unwidowed.
”
”
Julian Barnes
“
Bien entendu, cette fidelitĂ© aux impressions premiĂšres, et purement physiques, retrouvĂ©es Ă  chaque fois auprĂšs de mes amies, ne concernait pas que les traits de leur visage puisque on a vu que j'Ă©tais aussi sensible Ă  leur voix, plus troublante peut-ĂȘtre, (car elle n'offre pas seulement les mĂȘmes surfaces singuliĂšres et sensuelles que lui, elle fait partie de l'abĂźme inaccessible qui donne le vertige des baisers sans espoir) leur voix pareille au son unique d'un petit instrument oĂč chacune se mettait tout entiĂšre et qui n'Ă©tait qu'Ă  elle.
”
”
Marcel Proust (In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower)
“
Now come on, we’re off.” He marched out of the room. They heard the front door open, but Dudley did not move and after a few faltering steps Aunt Petunia stopped too. “What now?” barked Uncle Vernon, reappearing in the doorway. It seemed that Dudley was struggling with concepts too difficult to put into words. After several moments of apparently painful internal struggle he said, “But where’s he going to go?” Aunt Petunia and Uncle Vernon looked at each other. It was clear that Dudley was frightening them. Hestia Jones broke the silence. “But
surely you know where your nephew is going?” she asked, looking bewildered. “Certainly we know,” said Vernon Dursley. “He’s off with some of your lot, isn’t he? Right, Dudley, let’s get in the car, you heard the man, we’re in a hurry.” Again, Vernon Dursley marched as far as the front door, but Dudley did not follow. “Off with some of our lot?” Hestia looked outraged. Harry had met this attitude before: Witches and wizards seemed stunned that his closest living relatives took so little interest in the famous Harry Potter. “It’s fine,” Harry assured her. “It doesn’t matter, honestly.” “Doesn’t matter?” repeated Hestia, her voice rising ominously. “Don’t these people realize what you’ve been through? What danger you are in? The unique position you hold in the hearts of the anti-Voldemort movement?” “Er--no, they don’t,” said Harry. “They think I’m a waste of space, actually, but I’m used to--” “I don’t think you’re a waste of space.” If Harry had not seen Dudley’s lips move, he might not have believed it. As it was, he stared at Dudley for several seconds before accepting that it must have been his cousin who had spoken; for one thing, Dudley had turned red. Harry was embarrassed and astonished himself. “Well
er
thanks, Dudley.” Again, Dudley appeared to grapple with thoughts too unwieldy for expression before mumbling, “You saved my life.” “Not really,” said Harry. “It was your soul the dementor would have taken
” He looked curiously at his cousin. They had had virtually no contact during this summer or last, as Harry had come back to Privet Drive so briefly and kept to his room so much. It now dawned on Harry, however, that the cup of cold tea on which he had trodden that morning might not have been a booby trap at all. Although rather touched, he was nevertheless quite relieved that Dudley appeared to have exhausted his ability to express his feelings. After opening his mouth once or twice more, Dudley subsided into scarlet-faced silence. Aunt Petunia burst into tears. Hestia Jones gave her an approving look that changed to outrage as Aunt Petunia ran forward and embraced Dudley rather than Harry. “S-so sweet, Dudders
” she sobbed into his massive chest. “S-such a lovely b-boy
s-saying thank you
” “But he hasn’t said thank you at all!” said Hestia indignantly. “He only said he didn’t think Harry was a waste of space!” “Yeah, but coming from Dudley that’s like ‘I love you,’” said Harry, torn between annoyance and a desire to laugh as Aunt Petunia continued to clutch at Dudley as if he had just saved Harry from a burning building.
”
”
J.K. Rowling (Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Harry Potter, #7))
“
Simply put, within AS, there is a wide range of function. In truth, many AS people will never receive a diagnosis. They will continue to live with other labels or no label at all. At their best, they will be the eccentrics who wow us with their unusual habits and stream-of-consciousness creativity, the inventors who give us wonderfully unique gadgets that whiz and whirl and make our life surprisingly more manageable, the geniuses who discover new mathematical equations, the great musicians and writers and artists who enliven our lives. At their most neutral, they will be the loners who never now quite how to greet us, the aloof who aren't sure they want to greet us, the collectors who know everyone at the flea market by name and date of birth, the non-conformists who cover their cars in bumper stickers, a few of the professors everyone has in college. At their most noticeable, they will be the lost souls who invade our personal space, the regulars at every diner who carry on complete conversations with the group ten tables away, the people who sound suspiciously like robots, the characters who insist they wear the same socks and eat the same breakfast day in and day out, the people who never quite find their way but never quite lose it either.
”
”
Liane Holliday Willey (Pretending to be Normal: Living with Asperger's Syndrome (Autism Spectrum Disorder) Expanded Edition)
“
calmer and more content when being worn14 than when they are left alone, though there is always that unique baby who likes his or her own space. Babywearing, as with all other options for parenting gently, needs to be adapted to suit a little one’s own personality and needs. Some high-needs babies may do better taking naps during the day while being worn, giving mama a hands-free break while still meeting her baby’s needs. Other babies do well being worn after nursing to aid in digestion, reducing gassiness and the incidence of reflux.22 Babywearing also aids in hip health when using a properly designed carrier. The International Hip Dysplasia Institute has warned against excessive amounts of time in car seats, walkers, swings, and other devices that keep babies’ legs extended and pushed together. Their recommendation is for a baby’s legs to be in the ‘frog’ position, with their thighs supported and their knees bent.23 This is the positioning you should look for when shopping for a carrier to wear your little one. (Two Thousand Kisses a Day: Gentle Parenting Through the Ages and Stages) Wearing your baby against your heart, where the slightest tilt of your head brings your smile into focus for your tiny one, is not only one of the most beautiful and bonding experiences
”
”
L.R. Knost (Jesus, the Gentle Parent: Gentle Christian Parenting (Little Hearts Handbooks))
“
[A propos du faux Ă©volutionnisme] Il s'agit d'une tentative pour supprimer la diversitĂ© des cultures tout en feignant de la reconnaĂźtre pleinement. Car, si l'on traite les diffĂ©rents Ă©tats oĂč se trouvent les sociĂ©tĂ©s humaines, tant anciennes que lointaines, comme des stades ou des Ă©tapes d'un dĂ©veloppement unique qui, partant du mĂȘme point, doit les faire converger vers le mĂȘme but, on voit bien que la diversitĂ© n'est plus qu'apparente. L'humanitĂ© devient une et identique Ă  elle-mĂȘme ; seulement, cette unitĂ© et cette identitĂ© ne peuvent se rĂ©aliser que progressivement et la variĂ©tĂ© des cultures illustre les moments d'un processus qui dissimule une rĂ©alitĂ© plus profonde ou en retarde la manifestation.
”
”
Claude LĂ©vi-Strauss (Race et histoire)
“
Calmly We Walk Through This April Day Calmly we walk through this April's day, Metropolitan poetry here and there, In the park sit pauper and rentier, The screaming children, the motor-car Fugitive about us, running away, Between the worker and the millionaire Number provides all distances, It is Nineteen Thirty-Seven now, Many great dears are taken away, What will become of you and me (This is the school in which we learn...) Besides the photo and the memory? (...that time is the fire in which we burn.) (This is the school in which we learn...) What is the self amid this blaze? What am I now that I was then Which I shall suffer and act again, The theodicy I wrote in my high school days Restored all life from infancy, The children shouting are bright as they run (This is the school in which they learn . . .) Ravished entirely in their passing play! (...that time is the fire in which they burn.) Avid its rush, that reeling blaze! Where is my father and Eleanor? Not where are they now, dead seven years, But what they were then? No more? No more? From Nineteen-Fourteen to the present day, Bert Spira and Rhoda consume, consume Not where they are now (where are they now?) But what they were then, both beautiful; Each minute bursts in the burning room, The great globe reels in the solar fire, Spinning the trivial and unique away. (How all things flash! How all things flare!) What am I now that I was then? May memory restore again and again The smallest color of the smallest day: Time is the school in which we learn, Time is the fire in which we burn.
”
”
Delmore Schwartz
“
Relations among women on the Upper East Side are charged as they are perhaps nowhere else in the country or the world, and handbags, like cars, just might serve a lot of different functions all at once. A communication about where one stands in the inevitable hierarchy of Manhattan, a barometer of your wealth and connectedness and clout in a city where money and connections and clout are everything. A fashion statement. A security blanket, a way of self-soothing in a uniquely stressful town.
”
”
Wednesday Martin (Primates of Park Avenue)
“
Do you want any breakfast, Sam?” my mom asks. I never eat breakfast at home, but my mom still asks me every day—when she catches me before I duck out, anyway—and in that moment I realize how much I love the little everyday routines of my life: the fact that she always asks, the fact that I always say no because there’s a sesame bagel waiting for me in Lindsay’s car, the fact that we always listen to “No More Drama” as we pull into the parking lot. The fact that my mom always cooks spaghetti and meatballs on Sunday, and the fact that once a month my dad takes over the kitchen and makes his “special stew,” which is just hot-dog pieces and baked beans and lots of extra ketchup and molasses, and I would never admit to liking it, but it’s actually one of my favorite meals. The details that are my life’s special pattern, like how in handwoven rugs what really makes them unique are the tiny flaws in the stitching, little gaps and jumps and stutters that can never be reproduced. So many things become beautiful when you really look.
”
”
Lauren Oliver (Before I Fall)
“
Esther n'Ă©tait certainement pas bien Ă©duquĂ©e au sens habituel du terme, jamais l'idĂ©e ne lui serait venue de vider un cendrier ou de dĂ©barrasser le relief de ses repas, et c'est sans la moindre gĂȘne qu'elle laissait la lumiĂšre allumĂ©e derriĂšre elle dans les piĂšces qu'elle venait de quitter (il m'est arrivĂ©, suivant pas Ă  pas son parcours dans ma rĂ©sidence de San Jose, d'avoir Ă  actionner dix-sept commutateurs); il n'Ă©tait pas davantage question de lui demander de penser Ă  faire un achat, de ramener d'un magasin oĂč elle se rendait une course non destinĂ©e Ă  son propre usage, ou plus gĂ©nĂ©ralement de rendre un service quelconque. Comme toutes les trĂšs jolies jeunes filles elle n'Ă©tait au fond bonne qu'Ă  baiser, et il aurait Ă©tĂ© stupide de l'employer Ă  autre chose, de la voir autrement que comme un animal de luxe, en tout choyĂ© et gĂ„tĂ©, protĂ©gĂ© de tout souci comme de toute tĂąche ennuyeuse ou pĂ©nible afin de mieux pouvoir se consacrer Ă  son service exclusivement sexuel. Elle n'en Ă©tait pas moins trĂšs loin d'ĂȘtre ce monstre d'arrogance, d'Ă©goĂŻsme absolu et froid, au, pour parler en termes plus baudelairiens, cette infernale petite salope que sont la plupart des trĂšs jolies jeunes filles; il y avait en elle la conscience de la maladie, de la faiblesse et de la mort. Quoique belle, trĂšs belle, infiniment Ă©rotique et dĂ©sirable, Esther n'en Ă©tait pas moins sensible aux infirmitĂ©s animales, parce qu'elle les connaissait ; c'est ce soir-lĂ  que j'en pris conscience, et que je me mis vĂ©ritablement Ă  l'aimer. Le dĂ©sir physique, si violent soit-il, n'avait jamais suffi chez moi Ă  conduire Ă  l'amour, il n'avait pu atteindre ce stade ultime que lorsqu'il s'accompagnait, par une juxtaposition Ă©trange, d'une compassion pour l'ĂȘtre dĂ©sirĂ© ; tout ĂȘtre vivant, Ă©videmment, mĂ©rite la compassion du simple fait qu'il est en vie et se trouve par lĂ -mĂȘme exposĂ© Ă  des souffrances sans nombre, mais face Ă  un ĂȘtre jeune et en pleine santĂ© c'est une considĂ©ration qui paraĂźt bien thĂ©orique. Par sa maladie de reins, par sa faiblesse physique insoupçonnable mais rĂ©elle, Esther pouvait susciter en moi une compassion non feinte, chaque fois que l'envie me prendrait d'Ă©prouver ce sentiment Ă  son Ă©gard. Étant elle-mĂȘme compatissante, ayant mĂȘme des aspirations occasionnelles Ă  la bontĂ©, elle pouvait Ă©galement susciter en moi l'estime, ce qui parachevait l'Ă©difice, car je n'Ă©tais pas un ĂȘtre de passion, pas essentiellement, et si je pouvais dĂ©sirer quelqu'un de parfaitement mĂ©prisable, s'il m'Ă©tait arrivĂ© Ă  plusieurs reprises de baiser des filles dans l'unique but d'assurer mon emprise sur elles et au fond de les dominer, si j'Ă©tais mĂȘme allĂ© jusqu'Ă  utiliser ce peu louable sentiment dans des sketches, jusqu'Ă  manifester une comprĂ©hension troublante pour ces violeurs qui sacrifient leur victime immĂ©diatement aprĂšs avoir disposĂ© de son corps, j'avais par contre toujours eu besoin d'estimer pour aimer, jamais au fond je ne m'Ă©tais senti parfaitement Ă  l'aise dans une relation sexuelle basĂ©e sur la pure attirance Ă©rotique et l'indiffĂ©rence Ă  l'autre, j'avais toujours eu besoin, pour me sentir sexuellement heureux, d'un minimum - Ă  dĂ©faut d'amour - de sympathie, d'estime, de comprĂ©hension mutuelle; l'humanitĂ© non, je n'y avais pas renoncĂ©. (La possibilitĂ© d'une Ăźle, Daniel 1,15)
”
”
Michel Houellebecq
“
«Regardez, regardez, continua le comte en saisissant chacun des deux jeunes gens par la main, regardez, car, sur mon Ăąme, c'est curieux, voilĂ  un homme qui Ă©tait rĂ©signĂ© Ă  son sort, qui marchait Ă  l'Ă©chafaud, qui allait mourir comme un lĂąche, c'est vrai, mais enfin il allait mourir sans rĂ©sistance et sans rĂ©crimination: savez-vous ce qui lui donnait quelque force? savez-vous ce qui le consolait? savez-vous ce qui lui faisait prendre son supplice en patience? c'est qu'un autre partageait son angoisse; c'est qu'un autre allait mourir comme lui; c'est qu'un autre allait mourir avant lui! Menez deux moutons Ă  la boucherie, deux bƓufs Ă  l'abattoir, et faites comprendre Ă  l'un d'eux que son compagnon ne mourra pas, le mouton bĂȘlera de joie, le bƓuf mugira de plaisir mais l'homme, l'homme que Dieu a fait Ă  son image, l'homme Ă  qui Dieu a imposĂ© pour premiĂšre, pour unique, pour suprĂȘme loi, l'amour de son prochain, l'homme Ă  qui Dieu a donnĂ© une voix pour exprimer sa pensĂ©e, quel sera son premier cri quand il apprendra que son camarade est sauvĂ©? un blasphĂšme. Honneur Ă  l'homme, ce chef-d'Ɠuvre de la nature, ce roi de la crĂ©ation!»
”
”
Alexandre Dumas (Le Comte de Monte-Cristo, Tome II (The Count of Monte Cristo, part 2 of 4))
“
Paint me a small railroad station then, ten minutes before dark. Beyond the platform are the waters of the Wekonsett River, reflecting a somber afterglow. The architecture of the station is oddly informal, gloomy but unserious, and mostly resembles a pergola, cottage or summer house although this is a climate of harsh winters. The lamps along the platform burn with a nearly palpable plaintiveness. The setting seems in some way to be at the heart of the matter. We travel by plane, oftener than not, and yet the spirit of our country seems to have remained a country of railroads. You wake in a pullman bedroom at three a.m. in a city the name of which you do not know and may never discover. A man stands on the platform with a child on his shoulders. They are waving goodbye to some traveler, but what is the child doing up so late and why is the man crying? On a siding beside the platform there is a lighted dining car where a waiter sits alone at a table, adding up his accounts. Beyond this is a water tower and beyond this a well-lighted and empty street. Then you think happily that this is your country - unique, mysterious and vast.
”
”
John Cheever (Bullet Park (Spanish Edition))
“
But that California trip was just a flash in the eye of that year. The rest of the time, I hung in purgatory, playing talent shows and showcases here and there, living like a normal teenager in Philadelphia. Or maybe I should say living like a normal black teenager, which meant that aimlessness was accompanied by a certain unique set of risks. One night, I was out driving with a few friends of mine when the police pulled us over. We were told we fit the description of someone who had committed a robbery or stolen a car, though I don’t really know what kind of description that could have been: three black kids in a Hyundai blasting U2’s Joshua Tree on their way back from Bible study? The officer actually drew a gun. I was terrified. The worst part of all was that when I saw the police in the rearview mirror, I started thinking that maybe I had stolen the car. I don’t know what the psychological phenomenon is called, exactly, but when you encircle someone with suspicion, the idea of guilt just starts to appear within them. It was a terrible feeling and it’s a terrible process, and it was another reminder that the life I was leading, while superficially uneventful, had the potential to turn against me at any moment.
”
”
Ahmir "Questlove" Thompson (Mo' Meta Blues: The World According to Questlove)
“
Les États-Unis, c'est l'utopia rĂ©alisĂ©e. If ne faut pas juger de leur crise comme de la nĂŽtre [...] La leur est celle de l'utopie rĂ©alisĂ©e confrontĂ©e Ă  sa durĂ©e et Ă  sa permanence. La conviction idyllique des AmĂ©ricains d'ĂȘtre le centre du monde, la puissance suprĂȘme et le modĂšle absolu n'est pas fausse [...] [Elle] s'institue sur l'idĂ©e qu'elle est la rĂ©alisation de tout ce dont les autres ont rĂȘvĂ© - justice, abondance, droit, richesse, libertĂ©: elle le sait, elle y croit, et finalement les autres y croient aussi. [...] [La colonisation] reprĂ©sente pour le Vieux Monde l'expĂ©rience unique d'une commutation idĂ©alisĂ©e des valeurs, presque comme dans un roman de science-fiction (dont elle garde souvent la tonalitĂ©, comme aux USA) [...] C'est ce qui, quoi qu'il arrive, nous sĂ©pare des AmĂ©ricains. Nous ne les rattrapons jamais, et nous n'aurons jamais cette candeur. [...] Il nous manque l'Ăąme et l'audace de ce qu'on pourrait appeler le degrĂ© zĂ©ro d'une culture, la puissance de l'inculture [...], tout comme la Weltanschauung transcendantale et historique de l'Europe Ă©chappera toujours aux AmĂ©ricains. Pas plus que les pays du Tiers Monde n'intĂ©rioriseront jamais les valeurs de dĂ©mocratie et de progrĂšs technologique [...]. Nous vivons dans la nĂ©gativitĂ© et la contradiction, eux vivent dans le paradoxe (car c'est une idĂ©e paradoxale que celle d'une utopie rĂ©alisĂ©e). [...] Le charme et la puissance de l'(in)culture amĂ©ricaine viennent justement de la matĂ©rialisation soudaine et sans prĂ©cĂ©dents des modĂšles.
”
”
Jean Baudrillard (America)
“
de demander l’aumĂŽne. Les vrais pauvres mĂ©ritant assistance et compassion Ă©taient uniquement ceux qui, trop ĂągĂ©s ou malades, ne pouvaient plus subvenir Ă  leurs besoins en travaillant de leurs propres mains. Tous les autres devaient travailler et s’ils souffraient de la faim parce qu’ils ne faisaient rien, tant pis pour eux. A ce moment-lĂ  passa dans la rue un homme transpirant et haletant qui tirait Ă  grand peine deux charrettes de charbon. Pinocchio, jugeant sa physionomie avenante, l’accosta et lui demanda d’une petite voix tout en baissant les yeux : – Me feriez-vous la charitĂ© d’un petit sou, car je meurs de faim ? – Ce n’est pas un mais quatre sous que je te donnerai – rĂ©pondit le charbonnier – si tu m’aides Ă  tirer ces charrettes jusque chez moi.
”
”
Carlo Collodi (Les aventures de Pinocchio (French Edition))
“
My editor insists that I clarify that there isn’t actually a $25 bill hidden in this book, which is sort of ridiculous to have to explain, because there’s no such thing as a $25 bill. If you bought this book thinking you were going to find a $25 bill inside then I think you really just paid for a worthwhile lesson, and that lesson is, don’t sell your cow for magic beans. There was another book that explained this same concept many years ago, but I think my cribbed example is much more exciting. It’s like the Fifty Shades of Grey version of “Jack and the Beanstalk.” But with fewer anal beads, or beanstalks. 2. “Concoctulary” is a word that I just made up for words that you have to invent because they didn’t yet exist. It’s a portmanteau of “concocted” and “vocabulary.” I was going to call it an “imaginary” (as a portmanteau of “imagined” and “dictionary”) but turns out that the word “imaginary” was already concoctularied, which is actually fine because “concoctulary” sounds sort of unintentionally dirty and is also great fun to say. Try it for yourself. Con-COC-chew-lary. It sings. 3. My mental illness is not your mental illness. Even if we have the exact same diagnosis we will likely experience it in profoundly different ways. This book is my unique perspective on my personal path so far. It is not a textbook. If it were it would probably cost a lot more money and have significantly less profanity or stories about strangers sending you unexpected vaginas in the mail. As it is with all stories, fast cars, wild bears, mental illness, and even life, only one truth remains: your mileage may vary.
”
”
Jenny Lawson (Furiously Happy: A Funny Book About Horrible Things)
“
Sans doute, l’amitiĂ©, l’amitiĂ© qui a Ă©gard aux individus, est une chose frivole, et la lecture est une amitiĂ©. Mais du moins c’est une amitiĂ© sincĂšre, et le fait qu’elle s’adresse Ă  un mort, Ă  un absent, lui donne quelque chose de dĂ©sintĂ©ressĂ©, de presque touchant. C’est de plus une amitiĂ© dĂ©barrassĂ©e de tout ce qui fait la laideur des autres. Comme nous ne sommes tous, nous les vivants, que des morts qui ne sont pas encore entrĂ©s en fonctions, toutes ces politesses, toutes ces salutations dans le vestibule que nous appelons dĂ©fĂ©rence, gratitude, dĂ©vouement et oĂč nous mĂȘlons tant de mensonges, sont stĂ©riles et fatigantes. De plus, – dĂšs les premiĂšres relations de sympathie, d’admiration, de reconnaissance, – les premiĂšres paroles que nous prononçons, les premiĂšres lettres que nous Ă©crivons, tissent autour de nous les premiers fils d’une toile d’habitudes, d’une vĂ©ritable maniĂšre d’ĂȘtre, dont nous ne pouvons plus nous dĂ©barrasser dans les amitiĂ©s suivantes ; sans compter que pendant ce temps-lĂ  les paroles excessives que nous avons prononcĂ©es restent comme des lettres de change que nous devons payer, ou que nous paierons plus cher encore toute notre vie des remords de les avoir laissĂ© protester. Dans la lecture, l’amitiĂ© est soudain ramenĂ©e Ă  sa puretĂ© premiĂšre. Avec les livres, pas d’amabilitĂ©. Ces amis-lĂ , si nous passons la soirĂ©e avec eux, c’est vraiment que nous en avons envie. Eux, du moins, nous ne les quittons souvent qu’à regret. Et quand nous les avons quittĂ©s, aucune de ces pensĂ©es qui gĂątent l’amitiĂ© : Qu’ont-ils pensĂ© de nous ? – N’avons-nous pas manquĂ© de tact ? – Avons-nous plu ? – et la peur d’ĂȘtre oubliĂ© pour tel autre. Toutes ces agitations de l’amitiĂ© expirent au seuil de cette amitiĂ© pure et calme qu’est la lecture. Pas de dĂ©fĂ©rence non plus ; nous ne rions de ce que dit MoliĂšre que dans la mesure exacte oĂč nous le trouvons drĂŽle ; quand il nous ennuie nous n’avons pas peur d’avoir l’air ennuyĂ©, et quand nous avons dĂ©cidĂ©ment assez d’ĂȘtre avec lui, nous le remettons Ă  sa place aussi brusquement que s’il n’avait ni gĂ©nie ni cĂ©lĂ©britĂ©. L’atmosphĂšre de cette pure amitiĂ© est le silence, plus pur que la parole. Car nous parlons pour les autres, mais nous nous taisons pour nous-mĂȘmes. Aussi le silence ne porte pas, comme la parole, la trace de nos dĂ©fauts, de nos grimaces. Il est pur, il est vraiment une atmosphĂšre. Entre la pensĂ©e de l’auteur et la nĂŽtre il n’interpose pas ces Ă©lĂ©ments irrĂ©ductibles, rĂ©fractaires Ă  la pensĂ©e, de nos Ă©goĂŻsmes diffĂ©rents. Le langage mĂȘme du livre est pur (si le livre mĂ©rite ce nom), rendu transparent par la pensĂ©e de l’auteur qui en a retirĂ© tout ce qui n’était pas elle-mĂȘme jusqu’à le rendre son image fidĂšle, chaque phrase, au fond, ressemblant aux autres, car toutes sont dites par l’inflexion unique d’une personnalitĂ© ; de lĂ  une sorte de continuitĂ©, que les rapports de la vie et ce qu’ils mĂȘlent Ă  la pensĂ©e d’élĂ©ments qui lui sont Ă©trangers excluent et qui permet trĂšs vite de suivre la ligne mĂȘme de la pensĂ©e de l’auteur, les traits de sa physionomie qui se reflĂštent dans ce calme miroir. Nous savons nous plaire tour Ă  tour aux traits de chacun sans avoir besoin qu’ils soient admirables, car c’est un grand plaisir pour l’esprit de distinguer ces peintures profondes et d’aimer d’une amitiĂ© sans Ă©goĂŻsme, sans phrases, comme en soi-mĂȘme.
”
”
Marcel Proust (Days of Reading (Penguin Great Ideas))
“
Les Occidentaux, toujours animĂ©s par ce besoin de prosĂ©lytisme qui leur est si particulier, sont arrivĂ©s Ă  faire pĂ©nĂ©trer chez les autres, dans une certaine mesure, leur esprit antitraditionnel et matĂ©rialiste ; et, tandis que la premiĂšre forme d’invasion n’atteignait en somme que les corps, celle-ci empoisonne les intelligences et tue la spiritualitĂ© ; l’une a d’ailleurs prĂ©parĂ© l’autre et l’a rendue possible, de sorte que ce n’est en dĂ©finitive que par la force brutale que l’Occident est parvenu Ă  s’imposer partout, et il ne pouvait en ĂȘtre autrement, car c’est en cela que rĂ©side l’unique supĂ©rioritĂ© rĂ©elle de sa civilisation, si infĂ©rieure Ă  tout autre point de vue. L’envahissement occidental, c’est l’envahissement du matĂ©rialisme sous toutes ses formes, et ce ne peut ĂȘtre que cela ; tous les dĂ©guisements plus ou moins hypocrites, tous les prĂ©textes « moralistes », toutes les dĂ©clamations « humanitaires », toutes les habiletĂ©s d’une propagande qui sait Ă  l’occasion se faire insinuante pour mieux atteindre son but de destruction, ne peuvent rien contre cette vĂ©ritĂ©, qui ne saurait ĂȘtre contestĂ©e que par des naĂŻfs ou par ceux qui ont un intĂ©rĂȘt quelconque Ă  cette Ɠuvre vraiment « satanique », au sens le plus rigoureux du mot(*). (*)Satan, en hĂ©breu, c’est l’« adversaire », c’est-Ă -dire celui qui renverse toutes choses et les prend en quelque sorte Ă  rebours ; c’est l’esprit de nĂ©gation et de subversion, qui s’identifie Ă  la tendance descendante ou « infĂ©riorisante », « infernale » au sens Ă©tymologique, celle mĂȘme que suivent les ĂȘtres dans ce processus de matĂ©rialisation suivant lequel s’effectue tout le dĂ©veloppement de la civilisation moderne.
”
”
René Guénon (The Crisis of the Modern World)
“
They hung over the town, muted red, dark-pink, surrounded by every conceivable nuance of gray. The setting was wild and beautiful. Actually everyone should be in the streets, I thought, cars should be stopping, doors should be opened and drivers and passengers emerging with heads raised and eyes sparkling with curiosity and a craving for beauty, for what was it that was going on above our heads? However, a few glances at most were cast upward, perhaps followed by isolated comments about how beautiful the evening was, for sights like this were not exceptional, on the contrary, hardly a day passed without the sky being filled with fantastic cloud formations, each and every one illuminated in unique, never-to-be-repeated ways, and since what you see every day is what you never see, we lived our lives under the constantly changing sky without sparing it a glance or a thought.
”
”
Karl Ove KnausgÄrd (My Struggle: Book 1)
“
I was driving home one afternoon during this period when I rolled past a woman putting household objects and furniture out in her front yard. I figured it was a garage sale or she was termite bombing. As I moved past her house an object I saw stopped me. Dragged me into the present. A chair. The chair? The orange Danish modern chair that I broke and that subsequently broke up my marriage appeared to be sitting on her front lawn. “Impossible,” I thought. That was destroyed, thrown out, gone. I stopped my car abruptly in the street, opened my car door, and ran up into her yard. She was pulling more stuff out of her house. I said, “Hi. Hey, are you selling this stuff?” “Just take whatever you want. I’m leaving,” she said, going angrily about her business. “Where did you get this chair? I used to have one exactly like it. I’ve never seen another one.” “I found it,” she said. “Take it.” I inspected the chair. It had been carefully rebuilt, put back together. It was the chair. “Did you find this on the street up on the hill around the corner?” “Yeah,” she said. “Why?” “This chair destroyed my marriage.” She looked at me with a dark, stressed gaze for a second like she was looking through me at something burning in the distance and said, “Mine, too.” I didn’t ask any questions. Synchronicity was upon us. The causality was there, it was explainable, but the meaning of the object before us was at once unique and shared. It was some kind of black magic that sent my thoughts back to the garage wizard who kept Jung’s curtains locked up. What had he unleashed on this world, my world, her world, with this chair? “We have to take it out of circulation.” “Yes,” she said, catatonically, like how I felt. Then this stranger and I proceeded to destroy the chair with our hands and our feet until it was unfixable. We took a breath and looked down at the scattered chair shards. “Thanks,” she said. A horn honked. I turned to see my car, door open, sitting in the middle of the street, running. Someone needed to get by. “Good luck with everything,” I said, then walked back to my car and drove away, strangely relieved. I glanced in my rearview mirror and saw her making a pile of culprit pieces.
”
”
Marc Maron (Attempting Normal)
“
Here are two examples of just how strange and unique humans can be when they go about harming one another and caring for one another. The first example involves, well, my wife. So we’re in the minivan, our kids in the back, my wife driving. And this complete jerk cuts us off, almost causing an accident, and in a way that makes it clear that it wasn’t distractedness on his part, just sheer selfishness. My wife honks at him, and he flips us off. We’re livid, incensed. Asshole-where’s-the-cops-when-you-need-them, etc. And suddenly my wife announces that we’re going to follow him, make him a little nervous. I’m still furious, but this doesn’t strike me as the most prudent thing in the world. Nonetheless, my wife starts trailing him, right on his rear. After a few minutes the guy’s driving evasively, but my wife’s on him. Finally both cars stop at a red light, one that we know is a long one. Another car is stopped in front of the villain. He’s not going anywhere. Suddenly my wife grabs something from the front seat divider, opens her door, and says, “Now he’s going to be sorry.” I rouse myself feebly—“Uh, honey, do you really think this is such a goo—” But she’s out of the car, starts pounding on his window. I hurry over just in time to hear my wife say, “If you could do something that mean to another person, you probably need this,” in a venomous voice. She then flings something in the window. She returns to the car triumphant, just glorious. “What did you throw in there!?” She’s not talking yet. The light turns green, there’s no one behind us, and we just sit there. The thug’s car starts to blink a very sensible turn indicator, makes a slow turn, and heads down a side street into the dark at, like, five miles an hour. If it’s possible for a car to look ashamed, this car was doing it. “Honey, what did you throw in there, tell me?” She allows herself a small, malicious grin. “A grape lollipop.” I was awed by her savage passive-aggressiveness—“You’re such a mean, awful human that something must have gone really wrong in your childhood, and maybe this lollipop will help correct that just a little.” That guy was going to think twice before screwing with us again. I swelled with pride and love.
”
”
Robert M. Sapolsky (Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst)
“
n 1985, Bob Munro volunteered his time to go and serve in the poorest slums of Africa on behalf of the United Nations. He loved football. One day, he was passing through the Mathare slums in Nairobi, Kenya, which happens to be one of the poorest areas in the world, and where more than a quarter million people live in abject poverty and filth. He saw some children playing football, bare feet, in total grime— they weren’t actually playing football, but kicking each other. As he saw one of the children kick the other, he immediately shouted, ‘Foul’, and the game stopped. He got out of his car and being the white man, obviously stood out. As an ardent lover of football, he said, ‘This is not the way to play football.’ He took the ball and told the boys, ‘Tomorrow I will bring another ball and teach you how to play football.’ The next day, 600 children were there to play football. He made a rule that only those children who clean up the place be allowed to play. He started a volunteers’ group for self-help and said, ‘Those who want to play football as part of my team must clean up.’ The children got involved and started cleaning the slums, and out of love for football, slowly the entire area was cleaned. As time went by, he developed teams to play. He developed referees from within. Guess what was the result in four years? The Kenyan football eleven national team emerged from the same Mathare slums. Bob Munro has created thousands of football teams from there, but the rules are very unique. The rules are very clear that every player in those football teams must contribute 60 hours to social work and community service per month. Only then can they play football. They get additional points not for winning a game, but for completing a community service project such as cleaning, counselling and helping others. He has created 8,000 volunteers out of this system of community service through the love of football.
”
”
Shiv Khera (You Can Achieve More: Live By Design, Not By Default)
“
FOLCO : "Socialisme" et "communisme" sont devenus presque des gros mots. Quelle est l'essence de ce rĂȘve Ă  laquelle on pourrait s'identifier, au lieu de le repousser sans mĂȘme y rĂ©flĂ©chir ? TIZIANO : L'idĂ©e du socialisme Ă©tait simple : crĂ©er une sociĂ©tĂ© dans laquelle il n'y aurait pas de patrons pour contrĂŽler les moyens de production, moyens avec lesquels ils rĂ©duisent le peuple en esclavage; Si tu as une usine et que tu en es le patron absolu, tu peux licencier et embaucher Ă  ta guise, tu peu mĂȘme embaucher des enfants de douze ans et les faire travailler. Il est clair que tu engranges un profit Ă©norme, qui n'est pas dĂ» uniquement Ă  ton travail, mais Ă©galement au travail de ces personnes-lĂ . Alors, si les travailleurs participent dĂ©jĂ  Ă  l'effort de production, pourquoi ne pas les laisser copossĂ©der l'usine ? La sociĂ©tĂ© est pleine d'injustices. On regarde autour de soi et on se dit : mais comment, il n'est pas possible de rĂ©soudre ces injustices ? Je m'explique. Quelqu'un a une entreprise agricole en amont d'un fleuve avec beaucoup d'eau. Il peut construire une digue pour empĂȘcher que l'eau aille jusqu'au paysan dans la vallĂ©e, mais ce n'est pas juste. Ne peut-il pas, au contraire, trouver un accord pour que toute cette eau arrive Ă©galement chez celui qui se trouve en bas ? Le socialisme, c'est l'idĂ©e d'une sociĂ©tĂ© dans laquelle personne n'exploite le travail de l'autre. Chacun fait son devoir et, de tout ce qui a Ă©tĂ© fait en commun, chacun prend ce dont il a besoin. Cela signifie qu'il vit en fonction de ce dont il a besoin, qu'il n'accumule pas, car l'accumulation enlĂšve quelque chose aux autres et ne sert Ă  rien. Regarde, aujourd'hui, tous ces gens richissimes, mĂȘme en Italie ! Toute cette accumulation, Ă  quoi sert-elle ? Elle sert aux gens riches. Elle leur sert Ă  se construire un yacht, une gigantesque villa Ă  la mer. Souvent, tout cet argent n'est mĂȘme pas recyclĂ© dans le systĂšme qui produit du travail. Il y a quelque chose qui ne tourne pas rond. C'est de lĂ  qu'est nĂ©e l'idĂ©e du socialisme. FOLCO : Et le communisme ? Quelle est la diffĂ©rence entre le socialisme et le communisme ? TIZIANO : Le communisme a essayĂ© d'institutionnaliser l'aspiration socialiste, en crĂ©ant - on croit toujours que c'est la solution - des institutions et des organismes de contrĂŽle. DĂšs cet instant, le socialisme a disparu, parce que le socialisme a un fond anarchiste. Lorsqu'on commence Ă  mettre en place une police qui contrĂŽle combien de pain tu manges, qui oblige tout le monde Ă  aller au travail Ă  huit heures, et qui envoie au goulag ceux qui n'y vont pas, alors c'est fini. (p. 383-384)
”
”
Tiziano Terzani (La fine Ăš il mio inizio)
“
As she explained to her students, patients often awoke from very bad illnesses or cardiac arrests, talking about how they had been floating over their bodies. “Mm-hmmm,” Norma would reply, sometimes thinking, Yeah, yeah, I know, you were on the ceiling. Such stories were recounted so frequently that they hardly jolted medical personnel. Norma at the time had mostly chalked it up to some kind of drug reaction or brain malfunction, something like that. “No, really,” said a woman who’d recently come out of a coma. “I can prove it.” The woman had been in a car accident and been pronounced dead on arrival when she was brought into the emergency room. Medical students and interns had begun working on her and managed to get her heartbeat going, but then she had coded again. They’d kept on trying, jump-starting her heart again, this time stabilizing it. She’d remained in a coma for months, unresponsive. Then one day she awoke, talking about the brilliant light and how she remembered floating over her body. Norma thought she could have been dreaming about all kinds of things in those months when she was unconscious. But the woman told them she had obsessive-compulsive disorder and had a habit of memorizing numbers. While she was floating above her body, she had read the serial number on top of the respirator machine. And she remembered it. Norma looked at the machine. It was big and clunky, and this one stood about seven feet high. There was no way to see on top of the machine without a stepladder. “Okay, what’s the number?” Another nurse took out a piece of paper to jot it down. The woman rattled off twelve digits. A few days later, the nurses called maintenance to take the ventilator machine out of the room. The woman had recovered so well, she no longer needed it. When the worker arrived, the nurses asked if he wouldn’t mind climbing to the top to see if there was a serial number up there. He gave them a puzzled look and grabbed his ladder. When he made it up there, he told them that indeed there was a serial number. The nurses looked at each other. Could he read it to them? Norma watched him brush off a layer of dust to get a better look. He read the number. It was twelve digits long: the exact number that the woman had recited. The professor would later come to find out that her patient’s story was not unique. One of Norma’s colleagues at the University of Virginia Medical Center at the time, Dr. Raymond Moody, had published a book in 1975 called Life After Life, for which he had conducted the first large-scale study of people who had been declared clinically dead and been revived, interviewing 150 people from across the country. Some had been gone for as long as twenty minutes with no brain waves or pulse. In her lectures, Norma sometimes shared pieces of his research with her own students. Since Moody had begun looking into the near-death experiences, researchers from around the world had collected data on thousands and thousands of people who had gone through them—children, the blind, and people of all belief systems and cultures—publishing the findings in medical and research journals and books. Still, no one has been able to definitively account for the common experience all of Moody’s interviewees described. The inevitable question always followed: Is there life after death? Everyone had to answer that question based on his or her own beliefs, the professor said. For some of her students, that absence of scientific evidence of an afterlife did little to change their feelings about their faith. For others,
”
”
Erika Hayasaki (The Death Class: A True Story About Life)
“
[Le christianisme] occupe une place Ă  part car c’est la forme traditionnelle qui avait en charge l’Occident quand la dĂ©viation moderne s’est produite. On peut donc penser qu’une certaine responsabilitĂ© incombe Ă  cet Ă©gard au Catholicisme puisque c’est le Saint-SiĂšge romain qui a vocation Ă  rĂ©gir l’Église universelle.[...] L’Église est rĂ©gie par le Saint-Esprit, non par une loi que JĂ©sus lui aurait apportĂ©e (20). Il rĂ©sulte de cette particularitĂ© que le droit appliquĂ© dĂ©coule uniquement de l’intuition spirituelle de ceux qui dirigent l’Église ; or cette intuition peut varier car elle dĂ©pend de leur qualification et de leur rĂ©alisation effective. Ceci explique pourquoi, sur une question aussi essentielle que celle que nous Ă©voquons ici [le prĂȘt Ă  intĂ©rĂȘt], il y a une diffĂ©rence et mĂȘme une incompatibilitĂ© entre la doctrine catholique qui prĂ©valait au moyen Ăąge et celle qui est enseignĂ©e aujourd’hui ; ce qui peut paraĂźtre incomprĂ©hensible pour ceux qui suivent les lĂ©gislations sacrĂ©es. Au moyen Ăąge, le simple fait d’envisager que le prĂȘt Ă  intĂ©rĂȘt puisse ĂȘtre lĂ©gitime entraĂźnait l’excommunication, alors qu’aujourd’hui c’est uniquement l’usure qui est interdite, non le prĂȘt Ă  intĂ©rĂȘt en lui-mĂȘme. Cette Ă©volution est significative, car elle implique qu’un enseignement fondĂ© sur une connaissance Ă©sotĂ©rique vĂ©ritable a fait place Ă  un point de vue purement moral. L’intuition intellectuelle s’étant affaiblie au point de devenir inopĂ©rante, les raisons profondes et l’interdiction ont cessĂ© d’ĂȘtre perçues. Or, ces raisons prĂ©sentent un lien direct avec la naissance et le dĂ©veloppement de la dĂ©viation antitraditionnelle de l’Occident, car le prĂȘt Ă  intĂ©rĂȘt a Ă©tĂ© le moteur financier du monde moderne. RenĂ© GuĂ©non a montrĂ© le caractĂšre nĂ©faste de l’altĂ©ration des monnaies par Philippe le Bel (21) et les consĂ©quences dĂ©sastreuses que celle-ci avaient eu pour l’Occident. Le prĂȘt Ă  intĂ©rĂȘt est une autre modalitĂ© de cette altĂ©ration puisqu’il a pour effet de soumettre la valeur de la monnaie Ă  l’écoulement du temps, qui est celui du prĂȘt, alors que la fonction premiĂšre de celle-ci est de garantir la stabilitĂ© des Ă©changes par rĂ©fĂ©rence Ă  un principe immuable que la monnaie reprĂ©sente dans le domaine temporel.
”
”
Charles-André Gilis
“
Des erreurs plus subtiles, et par suite plus redoutables, se produisent parfois lorsqu’on parle, Ă  propos de l’initiation, d’une « communication » avec des Ă©tats supĂ©rieurs ou des « mondes spirituels » ; et, avant tout, il y a lĂ  trop souvent l’illusion qui consiste Ă  prendre pour « supĂ©rieur » ce qui ne l’est pas vĂ©ritablement, simplement parce qu’il apparaĂźt comme plus ou moins extraordinaire ou « anormal ». Il nous faudrait en somme rĂ©pĂ©ter ici tout ce que nous avons dĂ©jĂ  dit ailleurs de la confusion du psychique et du spirituel (1), car c’est celle-lĂ  qui est le plus frĂ©quemment commise Ă  cet Ă©gard ; les Ă©tats psychiques n’ont, en fait, rien de « supĂ©rieur » ni de « transcendant », puisqu’ils font uniquement partie de l’état individuel humain (2) ; et, quand nous parlons d’états supĂ©rieurs de l’ĂȘtre, sans aucun abus de langage, nous entendons par lĂ  exclusivement les Ă©tats supra-individuels. Certains vont mĂȘme encore plus loin dans la confusion et font « spirituel » Ă  peu prĂšs synonyme d’« invisible », c’est-Ă -dire qu’ils prennent pour tel, indistinctement, tout ce qui ne tombe pas sous les sens ordinaires et « normaux » ; nous avons vu qualifier ainsi jusqu’au monde « Ă©thĂ©rique », c’est-Ă -dire, tout simplement, la partie la moins grossiĂšre du monde corporel ! Dans ces conditions, il est fort Ă  craindre que la « communication » dont il s’agit ne se rĂ©duise en dĂ©finitive Ă  la « clairvoyance », Ă  la « clairaudience », ou Ă  l’exercice de quelque autre facultĂ© psychique du mĂȘme genre et non moins insignifiante, mĂȘme quand elle est rĂ©elle.
”
”
René Guénon (Perspectives on Initiation)
“
« Personne parmi ceux qui sont venu aprĂšs les compagnons [du ProphĂšte] n'ont pu atteindre leur niveau (aux compagnons). Ceci est du au fait que la plupart des sciences que nous cherchons et sur lesquelles nous nous focalisons jour et nuit, telles la linguistique, la grammaire, la morphologie et les fondements de la jurisprudence, Ă©taient innĂ©s chez eux. Leur haute disposition intellectuelle ainsi que la lumiĂšre de la prophĂ©tie qui les irradiait (Ă  travers le ProphĂšte) les protĂ©geait de l'erreur et des divagations. Ils n'avaient donc pas besoin d'utiliser la logique ou d'autres sciences rationnelles. Lorsqu'AllĂąh a unit leur cƓur et grĂące Ă  Sa bontĂ©, Il a suscitĂ© la fraternitĂ© entre eux, et ils ne leur Ă©tait pas nĂ©cessaire de se prĂ©parer aux dĂ©bats et Ă  l'argumentation. GrĂące Ă  leur science, ils n'avaient pas besoin de sauvegarder ce qu'ils entendaient du Qur°ùn et de la Sunnah par le biais du ProphĂšte. Ils comprenaient rapportaient et appliquaient ce qu'ils entendaient du ProphĂšte de la meilleur des maniĂšres. Aucun des compagnons ne dĂ©battait ni ne polĂ©miquait Ă  propos du Qur°ùn car il n'y avait pas d'Ă©garement ni d'innovations. AprĂšs cette Ă©poque les Suivants (at tĂąbi'Ă»n) Ă©taient proche d'eux si l'on se rĂ©fĂšre Ă  leur rang [auprĂšs d'AllĂąh] et Ă  leur mĂ©thodologie. AprĂšs les Suivants vinrent leurs disciples directs. Le ProphĂšte a tĂ©moignĂ© des vertus de ces trois gĂ©nĂ©rations. Par la suite les Gens de l'Innovation et de l'Egarement qui Ă©taient peu nombreux Ă  l'Ă©poque des trois premiĂšres gĂ©nĂ©rations virent leur nombre augmenter. Ainsi, afin de dĂ©fendre l'IslĂąm, les savants parmi les Ahl Us Sunnah, durent se confronter Ă  eux et dĂ©battre de peur que les faibles d'esprit s'Ă©garent, et qu'on voit s'ajouter des choses qui sont Ă©trangĂšres Ă  la religion. Les arguments des Gens de l'Innovation Ă©taient de plus en plus influencĂ©s par les travaux des logiciens et d'autres Gens de l'HĂ©rĂ©sie qui par la suite prirent l'habitude de crĂ©er beaucoup de doutes pour les utiliser contre nous (les Ahl Us Sunnah). Si nous les avions laissĂ© faire ils auraient convaincu de nombreuses personnes faibles et ignorantes parmi les Musulmans ainsi que les juristes et les savants nĂ©gligents ; la croyance saine aurait Ă©tĂ© alors altĂ©rĂ©e et des Ă©garements auraient Ă©tĂ© introduits. Des innovations blĂąmables et des hĂ©rĂ©sies se seraient alors rĂ©pandues. Il n'Ă©tait pas possible pour un simple individu de leur rĂ©pliquer et il y avait des risques que leur mots ne soient pas compris par tous, car les gens ne s'y intĂ©ressaient pas eux-mĂȘmes. Le point de vue des innovateurs peut ĂȘtre uniquement rĂ©futĂ© par quelqu'un qui les comprends. Tant que l'innovateur n'est pas rĂ©futĂ©, sa croyance devient dominante : les ignorants, les rois, les dirigeants, et ceux en charge de la population se mettent Ă  croire alors que les paroles prononcĂ©es par l'innovateur sont vĂ©ridiques. C'est ce qui s'est justement passĂ© dans plusieurs contrĂ©es dans lesquelles les gens avaient moins d'aspirations [aux sciences religieuses] si on les compare aux gens des gĂ©nĂ©rations prĂ©cĂ©dentes. A cause de cela, il Ă©tait devenu obligatoire pour les gens par le biais desquels AllĂąh Ă  prĂ©servĂ© la croyance de Ses croyants vertueux de repousser les doutes Ă©mis par les hĂ©rĂ©tiques. En effet la rĂ©compense octroyĂ©e est de loin plus grande que la rĂ©compense accordĂ©e Ă  un soldat combattant dans le sentier d'AllĂąh. »
”
”
ŰȘقي Ű§Ù„ŰŻÙŠÙ† Ű§Ù„ŰłŰšÙƒÙŠ
“
Public travel during seclusion for work and as a result desires to situate for viable services anywhere they amount to acquire exceptional ability. As a result of that included just recently is through car leasing centers. Such takes enormously much less instant in addition to rises initiative effectiveness. Entirely comfort is supplied other than, similar to the rush to take a trip anywhere during the city. Along with if despite which occurs to the automobile was travelling the firm vehicle renting facilities immediately supply by an unique vehicle in order to take place their service quality by applying customary of the team. We can take delight to enjoy any kind of movie also as going. There certainly is no panic of the really train or bus to be missed because you will hold your individual automobile. Correctly there would be no plain time frame. You understand how you can yet assign a Month-to-month auto rental or any sort of such of cream of the crop vehicles. The enormous brand names are also accessible to hire. Corporate specific essentially make use of such exceptional vehicles to show their standard in addition to their personal business worth. Comfy vehicles to some sort of any sort of sector of car have the ability to be teased behalf to their different rates. All resorts of 5-star in addition to 7-star does not include the vehicles, however, work with vehicles. For that reason, we are able to simply envision the well worth of these assigning facilities there are lots of a Month-to-month auto rental and every these service supply with a much better service as different to others. When it comes to such reason vehicle rentals are taking a prospering in the company in addition to the regional marketplace. Therefore, the group needs to support their well worth in the market using providing a type of facilities for their consumers. Not merely in locally nevertheless in bunches of huge business towards other fundamentals requirements. Just as travelling within any of the individual owning if you figure out a little bit magnificent on the edge and seem like acquiring it on the other hand you still cannot for the reason that they won't drop in for you however here by methods of this Auto Lease Dubai you could acquire whatever you figure out in purchasing. The program can be all set according to your choices equally as not according to the typical timings of public transportation. During the Car Rental solution, the client will hold no concerns pertaining to the protection or safeguarding of the auto. One can pick Automobile Lease Dubai along with doing accordingly it will turn into unproblematic to opt for a vehicle of their option even as choices any auto. You be up to the trip to the appropriate location that you wish by applying the aid of this car rental. Called for credentials for transport are the look out of the services nonetheless we have to be reliable that it's a superior company with every obligatory certificate approved. If a person does not be full of the ability to get an automobile even though one could easily hire an automobile as it's not at every little thing costly to utilize this improvement.
”
”
Auto Hire Function as Improvement For Daily Travelling
“
Traffic on Wisconsin Avenue wasn’t too bad, but he hit his first snag of the day when he found Pennsylvania to be mired in gridlock. While he crept forward he sang along with his Blaupunkt stereo. Neil Young’s On the Beach was a 1974 release that would have been a unique listening choice for most thirty-two-year-olds, but Ross had grown up with it. Revolution music, his mother used to call it, although Ethan realized there was a certain dissonance to the concept of singing along with antiestablishment songs while driving his luxury car on his way to his government job.
”
”
Mark Greaney (Tom Clancy Support and Defend)
“
Just a simple premise, back in San Diego DUI Lawyer arrested for drunk Style, this time in the direction of DUI and DWI generally unwanted, then little effect of alcohol is considered a leading progressive life. Americans in the second half of the US states, the sin just because the rules and stricter drunk driving laws more quickly hold. In addition, the results of all DUI lawyers in reality very difficult drive under the influence towards an unattainable production, to begin in San Diego that idea. The crime of DUI evaluation Provide always stops short of energy, but in reality because of traffic law enforcement to detect beautiful website, or you attack affects themselves can take to throw noted "checkpoints drinking water.” In some cases, the federal government said, but if you can do it in your own direction. Perhaps many car hit the rear part of the food as a result, the impact is recorded, your visit to show you the direction of your wine. Sometimes, someone reported an unstable support. Testing and observation around the federal government s decision in the same direction, it is not possible because most almost certainly to predict a jump back in their element. One or suspected poisoning at an affordable price set is designed to bring cases, their own rules and objectives, and with violation of traffic rules and the management style of the design more I can do for others the problem of selection that. They probably own the actual direction of their own drug, think about the purpose of the implementation of a user, then the friendly and with respect to speed, self-revealed the reason behind the purple party, appreciate it is also possible to DUI . San Diego right outcome for prison several internal unique opportunity, California expert is passed on to its customers and the code of .08% blood only a small car in California 23 152 (B) to answer good article Content (BAC) Assumption. Some of the inspiration for a special person for a month was necessary direction behind a person s mood, depends on you in the direction 23 § 152, may continue to be withheld because (). But in general, if not more, the sales people and just keep moving to stay DUI by police and they are removed direction or enough I began to feel, "personal involvement" is more than if under strict bail. Own all presentation of their work is to show. It s just maybe you just conditions, it is deposited in jail until eventually show itself may not be able to move allows. Expenses and income are affected by lead you affects costs, which child to leave behind, if not more than 0.08 per cent BAC does. Orientation, under the influence of the value of his research, the car broke into the possibility that some 23 152 have been found still proof (s). This is a normal move, and then the authority to suspend the system 6 is due to the fact that - 10 weeks, including perceived importance. Speaking of the court will have to apply for leave to the invention apparently drunk over in his address. Need him inside, a number of situations, the judge called a good time without alcohol can be. It is a matter, as long as the direction before the costly DUI do not experience a period of several weeks is legal. Worse, if there is only a repeat show that only a lawyer in San Diego drunk orientation. Too many of the legal rights of citizens under such guidelines as privatization and arms, vote. You own run for the benefit of all to make the removal of the time, which likely cost drivers behind the repeat drink. It is strong enough to get to San Diego recommends a good DUI is for that reason that the domestic legal experts. Obviously, the motivation many cases immediately, in simplest terms, is not swallowed. Self re direction is not the same thing, so you really recommended maximum future problem is to apply to yourself. This is a perfect example of the court had been found.
”
”
TerrySchrader
“
DUI Attorney: support for the first session of offenders You never drunk driving in the direction of history experts lawyers wait. We residents of rotation, the gel no expectation expectations towards buying stocks, since the first session, are limited. Use t season begins immediately in criminal convictions are historically unfortunately, they alone can not guarantee the handle is between the intact condition. Confusion to change the direction in itself is confusing for more than one activity. His car is maybe some sweat, it s really a license, shall not under any circumstances should not be included in what direction to become the character and charm. Alternatively, the direction, timing, determination of measurement, and as soon as contact is unlikely to have a DUI lawyer in order. Important opportunity to position itself towards its own car production can take infringement procedures and guidance to other people s needs. Proposals without criminal Well, a lot of things are personal and Kay produce it. Unfortunately, despite the problems of its people, once the processing method, mobilized, this is no way to make room. Disposal towards improving content or a very simple and unique works of art, only one scenario is horrible, and not give up their position at a time. You own budget independence, and even identical, to assess their own charm. Pressure and anxiety it can not wait any period during shifts towards harassment, what are some ideas. The selling price is that people recognize friends want to be transferred, at night, or just time to open up in prison in the direction shown shifted in the direction, you have reordered your own if it does not include what the strategy. The problem for the line to integrate a lot of style. For this reason, you specifically, your account must manage drunk driving lawyer. Therefore, it is a variable; because his word can be terrifying wear t due to the large number of registrations, to move with the first year.
”
”
DUIness
“
Il n’est pas douteux – prĂ©cisons-le de suite – qu'il y ait eu des monuments Ă©crits antĂ©rieurs aux traitĂ©s dont le Yiking est le troisiĂšme. Ces monuments ont Ă©tĂ© Ă©crits, ou dessinĂ©s, ou sculptĂ©s, sur le « Toit du Monde », berceau unique de l’humanitĂ©, Ă  l’aide de signes que toute l’humanitĂ© comprenait, avant qu’elle se fĂ»t divisĂ©e par des migrations diverses, et qu’elle eĂ»t ainsi perdu la conscience de sa totalitĂ©. Ce qu’est cette Ă©criture unique, on ne le saura sans doute jamais qu’à l’aide d’approximatives apprĂ©ciations ; car un palĂ©ographe ne reconstruira pas une Ă©criture au moyen d’un jambage, comme Cuvier reconstruisait un mammouth au moyen d’une jambe. Mais c’est de cette Ă©criture unique que dĂ©coulent, Ă  des Ă©poques concordantes, et par des procĂ©dĂ©s de dĂ©formations parallĂšles, les hiĂ©rogrammes Chinois et les hiĂ©roglyphes ChaldĂ©ens (ou sumĂ©ro-acadiens). Il est possible toutefois de dĂ©terminer les influences, toutes physiques, qui prĂ©sidĂšrent Ă  ces dĂ©formations. Sur ce Pamir, qui fut notre commun berceau, une mĂȘme langue, une mĂȘme graphie, toutes deux perdues, rĂ©gnaient. Un jour, soit qu’un cataclysme ait amenĂ© sur ces altitudes le froid qui y rĂšgne aujourd’hui, soit que, Ă  force de se pencher sur le bord rugueux des plateaux, la race humaine ait pris le vertige des plaines inconnues, un jour vint oĂč les hommes, par les fleuves qui prenaient naissance aux plateaux primitifs, descendirent aux niveaux infĂ©rieurs. Ainsi ceux du Sud, les futurs Rouges, par le Dzangbo et le Sindh, ainsi ceux de l’Ouest, les futurs Blancs, par le Syr et l’Amou, ainsi ceux de l’Est, les futurs Jaunes, par le Hoangho et le YangtzĂ©, tous, sans regarder en arriĂšre, quittĂšrent la montagne ancestrale qui fut le nombril du monde. Parmi eux, les vieillards et les savants emportĂšrent la Sagesse et la Tradition.
”
”
Matgioi (La voie métaphysique)
“
L'homo technicus-economicus croit aussi, Ă  sa maniĂšre, se suffire Ă  lui-mĂȘme. Arrogant, dĂ©miurge, autosatisfait, il se frotte les mains, dispose de tout ce qu'offre la planĂšte, s'arroge tous les droits, ignore ses devoirs, coupe les liens qui le relient aux autres humains, Ă  la nature, Ă  l'histoire et au cosmos. Il pousse si loin l'Ă©mancipation qu'il court le risque de dĂ©chirer tous les fils et de dĂ©crocher, de se dĂ©crocher, de s'auto-expulser de la crĂ©ation. Son idĂ©ologie est si simpliste que n'importe quel fondamentalisme religieux apparaĂźt en comparaison subtil et pluriel. Un seul prĂ©cepte, une seule loi, un seul paramĂštre, un seul Ă©talon : le rendement ! Qui dit mieux dans la trivialitĂ© criminelle d'un ordre unique ? Comment ne pas voir que chaque subside retirĂ© Ă  la culture et Ă  l'Ă©ducation devra ĂȘtre multipliĂ© par cent pour renflouer les services mĂ©dicaux, l'aide sociale et la sĂ©curitĂ© policiĂšre ? Car sans connaissances, sans vision et sans fertilitĂ© imaginaire, toute sociĂ©tĂ© sombre tĂŽt ou tard dans le non-sens et l'agression. Il existe Ă  ce jeu macabre un puissant contre-poison. A portĂ©e de la main, Ă  tout instant : c'est la gratitude. Elle seule suspend notre course avide. Elle seule donne accĂšs Ă  une abondance sans rivage. Elle rĂ©vĂšle que tout est don et qui plus est : don immĂ©ritĂ©. Non parce que nous en serions, selon une optique moralisante, indignes, mais parce que notre mĂ©rite ne sera jamais assez grand pour contrebalancer la gĂ©nĂ©rositĂ© de la vie ! (p. 13-14)
”
”
Christiane Singer (N'oublie pas les chevaux écumants du passé)
“
After running away from the United States government to pursue his antigovernment vision, Roger Ver had chosen to live in a place that was uniquely unreceptive to his brand of antiauthoritarian politics. Japan was a country that was still deeply wedded to traditional hierarchies with an educational system that taught its citizens from a young age to obey authority. This was evident in the country’s rigid business traditions—the bowing and exchanging of cards—and in the spiky-haired punks in Tokyo, who waited patiently for walk signals, even when there were no cars in sight. Roger had picked Japan, not because it would allow him to be around other like-minded people, but because he liked the orderliness of Japanese culture—and the women. He had met his longtime Japanese girlfriend at a gathering in California and even she had almost no interest in politics. As Roger discovered, the deferential culture made Japanese people uniquely skeptical about a project like Bitcoin that aimed to challenge government currencies. Japan was the only place Roger had encountered where people’s response, when he described Bitcoin, was to call it scary—rather than interesting or silly. This was due, Roger believed, to the way in which the virtual currency broke from the government’s mandates about how money should work. One of the only people with whom Roger had gotten any traction in Japan was a local pornography tycoon.
”
”
Nathaniel Popper (Digital Gold: Bitcoin and the Inside Story of the Misfits and Millionaires Trying to Reinvent Money)
“
Vasana is determinism that feels like free will. I’m reminded of my friend Jean, whom I’ve known for almost twenty years. Jean considers himself very spiritual and went so far in the early nineties as to walk way from his job with a newspaper in Denver to live in an ashram in western Massachusetts. But he found the atmosphere choking. “They’re all crypto Hindus,” he complained. “They don’t do anything but pray and chant and meditate.” So Jean decided to move on with his life. He’s fallen in love with a couple of women but has never married. He doesn’t like the notion of settling down and tends to move to a new state every four years or so. (He once told me that he counted up and discovered that he’s lived in forty different houses since he was born.) One day Jean called me with a story. He was on a date with a woman who had taken a sudden interest in Sufism, and while they were driving home, she told Jean that according to her Sufi teacher, everyone has a prevailing characteristic. “You mean the thing that is most prominent about them, like being extroverted or introverted?” he asked. “No, not prominent,” she said. “Your prevailing characteristic is hidden. You act on it without seeing that you’re acting on it.” The minute he heard this, Jean became excited. “I looked out the car window, and it hit me,” he said. “I sit on the fence. I am only comfortable if I can have both sides of a situation without committing to either.” All at once a great many pieces fell into place. Jean could see why he went into an ashram but didn’t feel like he was one of the group. He saw why he fell in love with women but always saw their faults. Much more came to light. Jean complains about his family yet never misses a Christmas with them. He considers himself an expert on every subject he’s studied—there have been many—but he doesn’t earn his living pursuing any of them. He is indeed an inveterate fence-sitter. And as his date suggested, Jean had no idea that his Vasana, for that’s what we’re talking about, made him enter into one situation after another without ever falling off the fence. “Just think,” he said with obvious surprise, “the thing that’s the most me is the thing I never saw.” If unconscious tendencies kept working in the dark, they wouldn’t be a problem. The genetic software in a penguin or wildebeest guides it to act without any knowledge that it is behaving much like every other penguin or wildebeest. But human beings, unique among all living creatures, want to break down Vasana. It’s not good enough to be a pawn who thinks he’s a king. We crave the assurance of absolute freedom and its result—a totally open future. Is this reasonable? Is it even possible? In his classic text, the Yoga Sutras, the sage Patanjali informs us that there are three types of Vasana. The kind that drives pleasant behavior he calls white Vasana; the kind that drives unpleasant behavior he calls dark Vasana; the kind that mixes the two he calls mixed Vasana. I would say Jean had mixed Vasana—he liked fence-sitting but he missed the reward of lasting love for another person, a driving aspiration, or a shared vision that would bond him with a community. He displayed the positives and negatives of someone who must keep every option open. The goal of the spiritual aspirant is to wear down Vasana so that clarity can be achieved. In clarity you know that you are not a puppet—you have released yourself from the unconscious drives that once fooled you into thinking that you were acting spontaneously.
”
”
Deepak Chopra (The Book of Secrets: Unlocking the Hidden Dimensions of Your Life)
“
L’idĂ©e du « libre examen » fut inventĂ©e pour dĂ©truire l’autoritĂ© spirituelle, non pas en la niant purement et simplement tout d’abord, mais en lui substituant une fausse autoritĂ©, celle de la raison individuelle, ou encore que le « rationalisme » philosophique prit Ă  tĂąche de remplacer l’intellectualitĂ© par ce qui n’en est que la caricature. L’idĂ©e de « valeur » nous paraĂźt se rattacher plutĂŽt au second cas : il y a dĂ©jĂ  longtemps qu’on ne reconnaĂźt plus, en fait, aucune hiĂ©rarchie rĂ©elle, c’est-Ă -dire fondĂ©e essentiellement sur la nature mĂȘme des choses ; mais, pour une raison ou pour une autre, que nous n’entendons pas rechercher ici, il a paru opportun (non pas sans doute aux philosophes, car ils ne sont vraisemblablement en cela que les premiĂšres dupes) d’instaurer dans la mentalitĂ© publique une fausse hiĂ©rarchie, basĂ©e uniquement sur des apprĂ©ciations sentimentales, donc entiĂšrement « subjective » (et d’autant plus inoffensive, au point de vue de l’« Ă©galitarisme » moderne, qu’elle se trouve ainsi relĂ©guĂ©e dans les nuĂ©es de l’« idĂ©al », autant dire parmi les chimĂšres de l’imagination) ; on pourrait dire, en somme, que les « valeurs » reprĂ©sentent une contrefaçon de hiĂ©rarchie Ă  l’usage d’un monde qui a Ă©tĂ© conduit Ă  la nĂ©gation de toute vraie hiĂ©rarchie. [La superstition de la « valeur »]
”
”
René Guénon (Mélanges)
“
Failures as people: millions of Americans felt that this description fit them to a T. Seeking a solution, any solution, they eagerly forked over their cash to any huckster who promised release, the quicker and more effortlessly the better: therapies like “bioenergetics” (“The Revolutionary Therapy That Uses the Language of the Body to Heal the Problems of the Mind”); Primal Scream (which held that when patients shrieked in a therapist’s office, childhood trauma could be reexperienced, then released; John Lennon and James Earl Jones were fans); or Transcendental Meditation, which promised that deliverance could come if you merely closed your eyes and chanted a mantra (the “TM” organization sold personal mantras, each supposedly “unique,” to hundreds of thousands of devotees). Or “religions” like the Church Universal and Triumphant, or the Reverend Sun Myung Moon’s Unification Church, or “Scientology”—this last one invented by a science fiction writer, reportedly on a bet. Devotees paid cash to be “audited” by practitioners who claimed the power—if, naturally, you paid for enough sessions—to remove “trauma patterns” accreted over the 75 million years that had passed since Xenu, tyrant of the Galactic Confederacy, deposited billions of people on earth next to volcanoes and detonated hydrogen bombs inside those volcanos, thus scattering harming “body thetans” to attach to the souls of the living, which once unlatched allowed practitioners to cross the “bridge to total freedom” and “unlimited creativity.” Another religion, the story had it, promised “perfect knowledge”—though its adherents’ public meeting was held up several hours because none of them knew how to run the movie projector. Gallup reported that six million Americans had tried TM, five million had twisted themselves into yoga poses, and two million had sampled some sort of Oriental religion. And hundreds of thousands of Americans in eleven cities had plunked down $250 for the privilege being screamed at as “assholes.” “est”—Erhard Seminars Training, named after the only-in-America hustler who invented it, Werner Erhard, originally Jack Rosenberg, a former used-car and encyclopedia salesman who had tried and failed to join the Marines (this was not incidental) at the age of seventeen, and experienced a spiritual rebirth one morning while driving across the Golden Gate Bridge (“I realized that I knew nothing. . . . In the next instant—after I realized that I knew nothing—I realized that I knew everything”)—promised “to transform one’s ability to experience living so that the situations one had been trying to change or had been putting up with, clear up just in the process of life itself,” all that in just sixty hours, courtesy of a for-profit corporation whose president had been general manager of the Coca-Cola Bottling Company of California and a former member of the Harvard Business School faculty. A
”
”
Rick Perlstein (The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan)
“
An example is the campaign that Goodby, Berlin & Sil- verstein produced for the Northern California Honda Deal- ers Advertising Association (NCHDAA) in 1989. Rather than conform to the stereotypical dealer group advertising ("one of a kind, never to be repeated deals, this weekend 114 Figure 4.1 UNUM: "Bear and Salmon. Figure 4.2 UNUM: "Father and Child." 115 PEELING THE ONION only, the Honda-thon, fifteen hundred dollars cash back . . ." shouted over cheesy running footage), it was decided that the campaign should reflect the tone of the national cam- paign that it ran alongside. After all, we reasoned, the only people who know that one spot is from the national cam- paign and another from a regional dealer group are industry insiders. In the real world, all people see is the name "Honda" at the end. It's dumb having one of (Los Angeles agency) Rubin Postaer's intelligent, stylish commercials for Honda in one break, and then in the next, 30 seconds of car salesman hell, also apparently from Honda. All the good work done by the first ad would be undone by the second. What if, we asked ourselves, we could in some way regionalize the national message? In other words, take the tone and quality of Rubin Postaer's campaign and make it unique to Northern California? All of the regional dealer groups signed off as the Northern California Chevy/Ford/ Toyota Dealers, yet none of the ads would have seemed out of place in Florida or Wisconsin. In fact, that's probably where they got them from. In our research, we began not by asking people about cars, or car dealers, but about living in Northern California. What's it like? What does it mean? How would you describe it to an alien? (There are times when my British accent comes in very useful.) How does it compare to Southern California? "Oh, North and South are very different," a man in a focus group told me. "How so?" "Well, let me put it this way. There's a great rivalry between the (San Francisco) Giants and the (L.A.) Dodgers," he said. "But the Dodgers' fans don't know about it." Everyone laughed. People in the "Southland" were on a different planet. All they cared about was their suntans and flashy cars. Northern Californians, by comparison, were more modest, discerning, less likely to buy things to "make state- ments," interested in how products performed as opposed to 116 Take the Wider View what they looked like, more environmentally conscious, and concerned with the quality of life. We already knew from American Honda—supplied re- search what Northern Californians thought of Honda's cars. They were perceived as stylish without being ostentatious, reliable, understated, good value for the money . . . the paral- lels were remarkable. The creative brief asked the team to consider placing Honda in the unique context of Northern California, and to imagine that "Hondas are designed with Northern Californi- ans in mind." Dave O'Hare, who always swore that he hated advertising taglines and had no talent for writing them, came back immediately with a line to which he wanted to write a campaign: "Is Honda the Perfect Car for Northern Califor- nia, or What?" The launch commercial took advantage of the rivalry between Northern and Southern California. Set in the state senate chamber in Sacramento, it opens on the Speaker try- ing to hush the house. "Please, please," he admonishes, "the gentleman from Northern California has the floor." "What my Southern Californian colleague proposes is a moral outrage," the senator splutters, waving a sheaf of papers at the other side of the floor. "Widening the Pacific Coast Highway . . . to ten lanes!" A Southern Californian senator with bouffant hair and a pink tie shrugs his shoulders. "It's too windy," he whines (note: windy as in curves, not weather), and his fellow Southern Californians high-five and murmur their assent. The Northern Californians go nuts, and the Speaker strug- gles in vain to call everyone to order. The camera goes out- side as th
”
”
Anonymous
“
As the producer states gradually forced the major oil companies to share with them more of the profits from oil, increasing quantities of sterling and dollars flowed to the Middle East. To maintain the balance of payments and the viability of the international financial system, Britain and the United States needed a mechanism for these currency flows to be returned. [...] The purchase of most goods, whether consumable materials like food and clothing or more durable items such as cars or industrial machinery, sooner or later reaches a limit where, in practical terms, no more of the commodity can be used and further acquisition is impossible to justify. Given the enormous size of oil revenues, and the relatively small populations and widespread poverty of many of the countries beginning to accumulate them, ordinary goods could not be purchased at a rate that would go far to balance the flow of dollars (and many could be bought from third countries, like Germany and Japan – purchases that would not improve the dollar problem). Weapons, on the other hand, could be purchased to be stored up rather than used, and came with their own forms of justification. Under the appropriate doctrines of security, ever-larger acquisitions could be rationalised on the grounds that they would make the need to use them less likely. Certain weapons, such as US fighter aircraft, were becoming so technically complex by the 1960s that a single item might cost over $10 million, offering a particularly compact vehicle for recycling dollars. Arms, therefore, could be purchased in quantities unlimited by any practical need or capacity to consume. As petrodollars flowed increasingly to the Middle East, the sale of expensive weaponry provided a unique apparatus for recycling those dollars – one that could expand without any normal commercial constraint.
”
”
Timothy Mitchell (Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil)
“
Let’s take a moment to acknowledge just how extraordinary your brain is. It generates up to 70,000 thoughts per day. It races with the speed of the fastest race car. Like your fingerprints, it is uniquely yours—there aren’t two brains in the universe exactly the same. It processes dramatically faster than any existing computer, and it has virtually infinite storage capacity. Even when damaged, it is capable of producing genius, and even if you only have half a brain, you can still be a fully functioning human being.
”
”
Jim Kwik (Limitless: Upgrade Your Brain, Learn Anything Faster, and Unlock Your Exceptional Life)
“
Car la nature humaine est ainsi faite, que les peines et les souffrances éprouvées simultanément ne s'additionnent pas totalement dans notre sensibilité, mais se dissimulent les unes derriÚres les autres par ordre de grandeur décroissante selon les lois bien connues de la perspective. Mécanisme bien providentiel qui rend possible notre vie au camp. Voilà pourquoi on entend dire si souvent dans la vie courante que l'homme est peréptuellement insatisfait : en réalité bien plus que l'incapacité de l'homme à atteindre à la sérénité absolue, cette opinion révÚle combien nous connaissons mal la nature complexe de l'état de malheur, et combien nous nous trompons en donnant à des causes multiples et hiérarchiquement subordonnées le nom unique de la cause principale.
”
”
Primo Levi (If This Is a Man ‱ The Truce)
“
Car la nature humaine est ainsi faite, que les peines et les souffrances Ă©prouvĂ©es simultanĂ©ment ne s'additionnent pas totalement dans notre sensibilitĂ©, mais se dissimulent les unes derriĂšres les autres par ordre de grandeur dĂ©croissante selon les lois bien connues de la perspective. MĂ©canisme bien providentiel qui rend possible notre vie au camp. VoilĂ  pourquoi on entend dire si souvent dans la vie courante que l'homme est perĂ©ptuellement insatisfait : en rĂ©alitĂ© bien plus que l'incapacitĂ© de l'homme Ă  atteindre Ă  la sĂ©rĂ©nitĂ© absolue, cette opinion rĂ©vĂšle combien nous connaissons mal la nature complexe de l'Ă©tat de malheur, et combien nous nous trompons en donnant Ă  des causes multiples et hiĂ©rarchiquement subordonnĂ©es le nom unique de la cause principale ; jusqu'au moment oĂč, celle-ci venant Ă  disparaĂźtre, nous dĂ©couvrons avec une douloureuse surprise que derriĂšre elle il y en a une autre, et mĂȘme tout une sĂ©rie d'autre.
”
”
Primo Levi (If This Is a Man ‱ The Truce)
“
I'm still trying to figure out how one finds room for a passionate love of not only chickens but also dollhouses. I've found that one all-consuming hobby is usually enough." Cedric grinned. "But regardless of how 'unique' this couple is, the wedding will be absolutely stunning, I assure you. And I'm sure you can handle it, Lottie." I was excited by the mere fact that he knew my name, let alone that he already seemed to trust me. But before I could say anything, he whipped the car across two lanes. "Thank God," Cedric said. "Next exit, there's a Chick-fil-A!" We both died laughing, and I realized this wacky wedding might have forged a bond between Cedric and me. If so, it might actually be, given the chicken of it all, worth the cuckoo.
”
”
Mary Hollis Huddleston (Without a Hitch)
“
Be confident in your abilities The most important truth to embrace at the very start is this: You are already wired with everything you need to be a great mom to your son. If I could take an X-ray of you as a mom, I would see a picture of bones and tissue laced with an intricate set of muscles and nerves. At various times, some of those nerves and muscles are dormant, and some are ignited and on fire. You have a complete set of worry neurons that ignite when your son gets in someone’s car. There are others that ignite when you watch him play football or when he brings you his report card. These are your very own, unique wires, reserved only for you and your son. Along with those that fire on a regular basis are thousands of others that are cool and quiet. They are waiting for your brain to send them signals to kick into gear. If someone hurts your son, your protective wiring ignites. If someone praises your son, your set of encouragement wires flare. If your son fails in school, your empathy wires fire up. In every situation in which your son needs your help, you
”
”
Meg Meeker (Strong Mothers, Strong Sons: Lessons Mothers Need to Raise Extraordinary Men)
“
Death Games (a) Conceptual. Nader again. His assault on the automobile clearly had me worried. Living in grey England, what I most treasured of my Shanghai childhood were my memories of American cars, a passion I’ve retained to this day. Looking back, one can see that Nader was the first of the ecopuritans, who proliferate now, convinced that everything is bad for us. In fact, too few things are bad for us, and one fears an indefinite future of pious bourgeois certitudes. It’s curious that these puritans strike such a chord - there is a deep underlying unease about the rate of social change, but little apparent change is actually taking place. Most superficial change belongs in the context of the word ‘new’, as applied to refrigerator or lawn-mower design. Real change is largely invisible, as befits this age of invisible technology - and people have embraced VCRs, fax machines, word processors without a thought, along with the new social habits that have sprung up around them. They have also accepted the unique vocabulary and grammar of late-20th-century life (whose psychology I have tried to describe in the present book), though most would deny it vehemently if asked.
”
”
J.G. Ballard (The Atrocity Exhibition)
“
AModernIndian.com is a great way to see whether the products are worth buying before you invest your money or time. This website offers reviews of all types of products. They are aimed at the average person and not a technical level so everyone can understand them. Available on an assortment of devices including desktop, laptop and mobile. The site is constantly updated with new information so visitors are able to stay educated on topics they are interested in. AModernIndian.com covers many popular topics with in depth information, such as health and fitness, sports, travel, entertainment, cars and trucks, preschool toys, books and many more. AModernIndian.com is unique in its approach, because it provides both types of product reviews - where the editors actually purchase the product as well as research from professional review aggregators like Amazon, Flipkart etc. We provide Reviews, Ultimate Guides and Tips for most products.
”
”
A Modern Indian
“
MITI, far from being a uniquely brilliant leader of government/industrial partnership, has been wrong so often that the Japanese themselves will concede that much of their growth derives from industry's rejection of MITI’s guidance. MITI, incredibly, opposed the development of the very areas where Japan has been successful: cars, electronics and cameras. MITI has, moreover, poured vast funds into desperately wasteful projects. Thanks to MITI, Japan has a huge overcapacity in steel - no less than three times the national requirement. This, probably the most expensive mistake Japan ever made in peacetime, was a mistake of genius, because Japan has no natural resources: it has to import everything; the iron ore, the coal, the gas, the limestone and the oil to make its unwanted steel. Undaunted, MITI then invested in giant, loss-making (£400 million losses by 1992) 5th generation supercomputers at the precise moment that the market opened for the small personal computer; and MITI' s attempts at dominating the world's pharmaceutical and telecommunications industries have each failed. Nor is this just anecdote. In a meticulous study of MITI’s interventions into the Japanese economy between 1955 and 1990, Richard Beason of Alberta University and David Weinterin of Harvard showed that, across the 13 major sectors of the economy, surveying hundreds of different companies, Japan's bureaucrats almost invariably picked and supported the losers.
”
”
Terence Kealey (The Economic Laws of Scientific Research)
“
Les Ă©conomistes les plus coriaces se sont cassĂ© les dents – mĂȘme celles qui sont en or – sur l'Ă©pineuse question de la vie financiĂšre Ă  Montaubout. Le premier os Ă  ronger (non des moindres), demeure celui de la monnaie. Madame la PrĂ©sidente a refusĂ© de plier Ă  la dure loi de la soumission aux monnaies existantes : dollar, livre sterling, euro, franc CFA
 Les autoritĂ©s Ă©conomiques internationales ont toute reçu la mĂȘme rĂ©ponse d'une clartĂ© aveuglante : « Inutile d'avoir une monnaie unique, car elles sont toutes iniques. » L'emploi de ce mot peu usitĂ© est d'abord passĂ© pour une coquille journalistique ; puis pour une coquetterie langagiĂšre de madame la PrĂ©sidente voulant exposer sa parfaite maĂźtrise de la langue française, mais au final, il s'est avĂ©rĂ© que ce n'Ă©tait ni l'un, ni l'autre, mais bel et bien un choix politique et Ă©conomique fort. (p. 35)
”
”
Thierry Moral (DerniĂšres nouvelles de Montaubout)
“
The Sayanim: Mossad’s International Volunteers by Michael Ellmer April 16, 2021 In the Hebrew language, Sayanim translates to mean “helpers” or “assistants”. In the Mossad, the Sayanim are a volunteer network of Jews across the world who are loyal to the nation of Israel and willing to help the agency in their global mission. According to a comparative study of HUMINT in counterterrorism between Israel and France, Amy Kirchheimer writes that Israel has “the challenge of collecting intelligence on a vast array of targets with a comparatively small number of intelligence officers, and the Sayanim network helped the Mossad Katsas (case officers) somewhat lessen this problem.” According to Gordon Thomas in his book Gideon’s Spies: Mossad’s Secret Warriors, the Sayanim were a creation of Mier Amit, the Chief Director of the Mossad from 1963-1968. Thomas writes, “Each Sayan was an example of historical cohesiveness of the world Jewish community. Regardless of allegiance to his or her country, in the final analysis, a Sayan would recognize a greater loyalty: the mystical one to Israel, and a need to help protect it from its enemies”. The loyalty of the Sayanim is what fuels their mission and none reside on a Mossad payroll. The flexibility and diversity in their roles give the Mossad a unique operational capability with increased protection from detection and a way to avoid budget restraints or accountability. Most Sayanim fulfil various roles that can themselves be used to support Mossad operations. For example, Thomas writes, “A car Sayan, running a rental agency, provided a Katsa with a vehicle without the usual documentation. A letting agency Sayan offered accommodation. A bank Sayan might unlock funds outside normal hours. A Sayan physician would give medical assistance – treating a bullet wound for example – without informing the authorities”.
”
”
Michael Ellmer
“
Car si le travail abstrait forme la substance du capital, et si par consĂ©quent toute ontologie du travail est exclue puisque l'abstraction travail en tant qu' "universalitĂ© sociale" ne vaut que pour une seule et unique forme historiquement spĂ©cifique de sociĂ©tĂ©, alors crise et borne historique absolue du capital ne peuvent provenir que d'un mĂ©canisme de contradictions interne au procĂšs capitaliste de valorisation, par lequel celui-ci rend le travail "superflu" et le rejette hors de lui : en somme le capital se "dĂ©substantialise" lui-mĂȘme, la valeur est dĂ©valorisĂ©e, et cela instaure une borne interne absolue qui n'intervient pas seulement au plan logique mais doit nĂ©cessairement apparaĂźtre aussi au plan historico-empirique.
”
”
Robert Kurz (The Substance of Capital (The Life and Death of Capitalism))
“
Since the 19th century, medicine has focused on specific disease states by linking collections of signs and symptoms to single organs.... Systems biology and its offspring, sometimes called Network Medicine, takes a more wholistic approach, looking at all the diverse genetic, metabolic, and environmental factors that contribute to clinical disease. Equally important, it looks at the preclinical manifestations of pathology. The current focus of medicine is much like the focus that an auto mechanic takes to repair a car. The diagnostic process isolates a broken part and repairs or replaces it.... Although this strategy has saved countless lives and reduced pain and suffering, it nevertheless treats the disease and not the patient, with all their unique habits, lifestyle mistakes, environmental exposures, psychosocial interactions, and genetic predispositions.
”
”
Paul Cerrato (Reinventing Clinical Decision Support: Data Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, and Diagnostic Reasoning (HIMSS Book Series))
“
À vrai dire, on adore le bĂ©nĂ©volat pour les femmes et c’est pourquoi le mĂ©tier de mĂšre au foyer est le seul qu’on refuse d’évaluer en termes Ă©conomiques. Fournissant Ă  la collectivitĂ© une contribution considĂ©rable en Ă©levant leurs trĂšs jeunes enfants, les mĂšres (malgrĂ© quelques discours Ă©mus et une allocation de salaire unique dĂ©risoire) restent ignorĂ©es quand elles travaillent Ă  la maison et pĂ©nalisĂ©es quand elles travaillent au-dehors (frais de garde Ă©levĂ©s, insuffisance de crĂšches). Il faut qu’elles parviennent Ă  Ă©chapper Ă  cette dĂ©valorisation de tout ce qui est fĂ©minin. DĂ©valorisation si profondĂ©ment ressentie et si destructrice que c’est elle qui donne souvent aux « mĂšres au foyer » ce ton aigri ou revendicateur en face des femmes qui travaillent, option “supĂ©rieure” puisque masculine, alors qu’elles devraient pouvoir dire trĂšs simplement : « J’ai choisi pour “mĂ©tier” d’élever mes enfants car c’est mon goĂ»t ou ma vocation Ă  moi. »
”
”
BenoĂźte Groult (Ainsi soit-elle)
“
The cyst turned out to be a benign tumor. Kat liked that use of benign, as if the thing had a soul and wished her well. It was big as a grapefruit, the doctor said. “Big as a coconut,” said Kat. Other people had grapefruits. “Coconut” was better. It conveyed the hardness of it, and the hairiness, too. The hair in it was red—long strands of it wound round and round inside, like a ball of wet wool gone berserk or like the guck you pulled out of a clogged bathroom-sink drain. There were little bones in it too, or fragments of bone; bird bones, the bones of a sparrow crushed by a car. There was a scattering of nails, toe or finger. There were five perfectly formed teeth. “Is this abnormal?” Kat asked the doctor, who smiled. Now that he had gone in and come out again, unscathed, he was less clenched. “Abnormal? No,” he said carefully, as if breaking the news to a mother about a freakish accident to her newborn. “Let’s just say it’s fairly common.” Kat was a little disappointed. She would have preferred uniqueness.
”
”
Margaret Atwood (Wilderness Tips)
“
RÉPONSES INTERROGATIVES À UNE QUESTION DE MARTIN HEIDEGGER La poĂ©sie ne rythmera plus l'action. Elle sera en avant. RIMBAUD. Divers sens Ă©troits pourraient ĂȘtre proposĂ©s, compte non tenu du sens qui se crĂ©e dans le mouvement mĂȘme de toute poĂ©sie objective, toujours en chemin vers le point qui signe sa justification et clĂŽt son existence, Ă  l'Ă©cart, en avant de l'existence du mot Dieu : -La poĂ©sie entraĂźnera Ă  vue l'action, se plaçant en avant d'elle. L'en-avant suppose toutefois un alignement d'angle de la poĂ©sie sur l'action, comme un vĂ©hicule pilote aspire Ă  courte distance par sa vitesse un second vĂ©hicule qui le suit. Il lui ouvre la voie, contient sa dispersion, le nourrit de sa lancĂ©e. -La poĂ©sie, sur-cerveau de l’action, telle la pensĂ©e qui commande au corps de l'univers, comme l'imagination visionnaire fournit l'image de ce qui sera Ă  l'esprit forgeur qui la sollicite. De lĂ , l'enavant. -La poĂ©sie sera « un chant de dĂ©part ». PoĂ©sie et action, vases obstinĂ©ment communicants. La poĂ©sie, pointe de flĂšche supposant l'arc action, l'objet sujet Ă©troitement dĂ©pendant, la flĂšche Ă©tant projetĂ©e au loin et ne retombant pas car l'arc qui la suit la ressaisira avant chute, les deux Ă©gaux bien qu'inĂ©gaux, dans un double et unique mouvement de rejonction. -L'action accompagnera la poĂ©sie par une admirable fatalitĂ©, la rĂ©fraction de la seconde dans le miroir brĂ»lant et brouillĂ© de la premiĂšre produisant une contradiction et communiquant le signe plus (+) Ă  la matiĂšre abrupte de l’action. -La poĂ©sie, du fait de la parole mĂȘme, est toujours mise par la pensĂ©e en avant de l'agir dont elle emmĂšne le contenu imparfait en une course perpĂ©tuelle vie-mort-vie. -L'action est aveugle, c'est la poĂ©sie qui voit. L'une est unie par un lien mĂšre-fils Ă  1'autre, le fils en avant de la mĂšre et la guidant par nĂ©cessitĂ© plus que par amour. -La libre dĂ©termination de la poĂ©sie semble lui confĂ©rer sa qualitĂ© conductrice. Elle serait un ĂȘtre action, en avant de Faction. -La poĂ©sie est la loi, l'action demeure le phĂ©nomĂšne. L'Ă©clair prĂ©cĂšde le tonnerre, illuminant de haut en bas son thĂ©Ăątre, lui donnant valeur instantanĂ©e. -La poĂ©sie est le mouvement pur ordonnant le mouvement gĂ©nĂ©ral. Elle enseigne le pays en se dĂ©calant. -La poĂ©sie ne rythme plus l'action, elle se porte en avant pour lui indiquer le chemin mobile. C'est pourquoi la poĂ©sie touche la premiĂšre. Elle songe l'action et, grĂące Ă  son matĂ©riau, construit la Maison, mais jamais une fois pour toutes. _ La poĂ©sie est le moi en avant de l'en soi, « le poĂšte Ă©tant chargĂ© de l'HumanitĂ© » (Rimbaud). - La poĂ©sie serait de « la pensĂ©e chantĂ©e ». Elle serait l'Ɠuvre en avant de Faction, serait sa consĂ©quence finale et dĂ©tachĂ©e. -La poĂ©sie est une tĂȘte chercheuse. L'action est son corps. Accomplissant une rĂ©volution ils font, au terme de celle-ci, coĂŻncider la fin et le commencement. Ainsi de suite selon le cercle. -Dans l'optique de Rimbaud et de la Commune, la poĂ©sie ne servira plus la bourgeoisie, ne la rythmera plus. Elle sera en avant, la bourgeoisie ici supposĂ©e action de conquĂȘte. La poĂ©sie sera alors sa propre maĂźtresse, Ă©tant maĂźtresse de sa rĂ©volution; le signal du dĂ©part donnĂ©, l'action en-vue-de se transformant sans cesse en action voyant.
”
”
René Char (Recherche de la base et du sommet)
“
WhatsApp: +4-4-7-4-9-3-4-9-6-6-3-2 Email; chat@botnetcryptorecovery.info For over two decades, I've navigated the twists and turns of the car business, always on the lookout for new opportunities to expand and grow. When Bitcoin emerged on the scene, its potential for lucrative returns piqued my interest. With $12,000 in hand, I took the plunge and invested in this digital currency, unaware of the rollercoaster ride that lay ahead as Bitcoin's value soared, my initial investment blossomed into $60,000, opening doors for expansion in my car business and enabling me to acquire additional vehicles. Yet, amidst the euphoria of financial success, a single email shattered my world. Appearing to be from my trading platform, the email requested verification of my account details. Oblivious to the looming danger, I compiled without a second thought, unknowingly handing over access to my Bitcoin wallet. Panic set in as I realized the magnitude of my mistake – my hard-earned funds were swiftly drained by cybercriminals. I sought solace and assistance, stumbling upon a recommendation of (BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY). Desperate for a lifeline, I reached out to their team, and to my relief, they responded swiftly with professionalism and expertise. With meticulous precision, They embarked on the arduous task of tracing the fraudulent activity, leaving no stone unturned in their quest to reclaim what was rightfully mine. Through their relentless efforts, the majority of my lost funds were miraculously recovered, offering a glimmer of hope in the aftermath of devastation. Yet, their assistance extended beyond mere financial restitution. (BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY) imparted invaluable wisdom, serving as guardians against future threats to my digital assets. They emphasized the imperative of implementing two-factor authentication, crafting robust and unique passwords, and honing the ability to discern phishing attempts from legitimate correspondence. This served as a sobering lesson, a cautionary tale of the perils lurking in the digital realm. However, amidst the adversity, emerged a newfound sense of resilience and determination. Armed with the knowledge bestowed upon me by (BOTNET CRYPTO RECOVERY), I forged ahead with renewed vigor, fortified against the treacherous landscape of online security threats. In hindsight, financial triumph to eventual redemption was fraught with hardship and heartache. Yet, it also underscored the transformative power of resilience and the invaluable guidance offered by trusted allies in times of crisis. As I reflect on this tumultuous chapter of my life, I am reminded of the importance of remaining vigilant, both in the pursuit of financial prosperity and in safeguarding against the ever-present specter of cyber threats. Through adversity, we glean invaluable lessons, emerging stronger, wiser, and more resilient than before. In the end, it is not the setbacks we encounter that define us, but rather, our ability to rise above them, armed with the knowledge and fortitude to navigate the unpredictable terrain of life's journey.
”
”
Olivia Leo
“
These entities, angelic, or of other nature and origins have been called forth through deep resonance in your soul. They are here to support and honor your specific makeup and the particular life missions and themes you came to experience and alchemize within your system. Opening to them may be likened unto you purchasing a car which is designed specifically to hug and support every curve of your body, and it being designed in a way that every switch or control in the vehicle is in the very place which works best for you. The smell of the interior is specifically enlivening to your senses, the headlights offer different unique clarity and views, the tires adjust for all weather patterns and conditions. You feel held and have the tools to go on any adventure and explore. In saying this, we are not implying that knowing your guides will remove all pain or suffering from this experience of life, for there are specific pains and sufferings that we have chosen to step into for our highest understanding and maturation. Under the nurturance and care of our guides, we may be held and lovingly nudged down the path to our own reconciliation and joy.
”
”
Gwen Juvenal ("The Seed" Journal: A Space for Recording Your Soul Experiences and Expansive Journeys (Journeys of Joy and Freedom))
“
The Morgan Motor Company, established in 1909, epitomises British automotive craftsmanship. Their vehicles are a harmonious blend of tradition and innovation, embodying a legacy passed down through generations. Each car is meticulously handcrafted in Malvern, UK, ensuring a unique driving experience for enthusiasts worldwide. With a focus on quality and individuality, Morgan cars are cherished by their owners as much for their timeless design as for their exhilarating performance on the road. Under the stewardship of the Morgan family, supported by Investindustrial, the company continues to thrive, remaining true to its heritage while embracing advancements in technology. With an unwavering commitment to excellence, Morgan Motor Company stands as a symbol of British ingenuity and passion for the open road.
”
”
MORGAN MOTOR COMPANY
“
Stage 2 Skylark drag race package of 1970 contributed a unique hood scoop, which (in reproduction form) has been adopted by hip Buick drag racers across the country. Loosely patterned after the steel scoop used on heavy Ford trucks (and adopted by Pontiac for its 1963 421 Super Duty cars), Buick’s
”
”
Steve Magnante (Steve Magnante's 1001 Muscle Car Facts (Cartech))
“
Perfide Manon ! Ah! perfide! perfide! Elle me rĂ©pĂ©ta, en pleurant Ă  chaudes larmes, qu'elle ne prĂ©tendait point justifier sa perfidie. Que prĂ©tendez-vous donc ? m'Ă©criai-je encore. Je prĂ©tends mourir, rĂ©pondit-elle, si vous ne me rendez votre cƓur, sans lequel il est impossible que je vive. Demande donc ma vie, infidĂšle! repris-je en versant moi-mĂȘme des pleurs, que je m'efforçai en vain de retenir. Demande ma vie, qui est l'unique chose qui me reste Ă  te sacrifier; car mon cƓur n'a jamais cessĂ© d'ĂȘtre Ă  toi. À peine eus-je achevĂ© ces derniers mots, qu'elle se leva avec transport pour venir m'embrasser. Elle m'accabla de mille caresses passionnĂ©es. Elle m'appela par tous les noms que l'amour invente pour exprimer ses plus vives tendresses.
”
”
Abbe Prevost (Histoire du Chevalier des Grieux et de manon Lescaut)
“
C’est un samedi semblable Ă  bien d’autres, pourtant unique. Sur la capitale, le ciel est dĂ©gagĂ©, laissant au soleil levant le soin de chauffer les façades en pierre de taille. Une brume de chaleur s’étend au-dessus de la Seine, les pĂȘcheurs matinaux se rafraĂźchissent le visage avec l’eau du fleuve. Sous le pont Alexandre III, quelques chanceux moulinent leur fil avec une carpe ou une grĂ©mille suffisamment naĂŻve pour se piquer la lĂšvre sur leur hameçon. Ceux-lĂ  feront la fiertĂ© de leur femme et ils s’imaginent rentrer hardiment dans leur appartement, accueillis comme de rĂ©els hĂ©ros pour avoir attrapĂ© une proie de trois cents grammes tout au plus, qui nourrirait Ă  peine un chaton. Mais le sourire de ces hommes se contemple avec beautĂ©, car eux aussi seront bientĂŽt chassĂ©s, mais ils ne s’en doutent pas. L’innocence des jours heureux se dessine sur leur visage.
”
”
Joffrey Gabriel (Deux frĂšres (La TroisiĂšme clef) (French Edition))
“
They shared about the beautiful and unique plans that God has for each individual. Up until recently, I hadn’t had many hopes or plans. My life had been like a car stuck in a snowy ditch in the middle of the night. I knew I was stuck, but I didn’t know how to get out of it. When these guys came along, they had a tow truck, chains, and a spotlight that shed light on all the problem areas. They didn’t make me feel guilty about my problems; instead, they jumped out into the cold and helped me start digging. Not only that, but they were teaching me to see the hopes and plans that God had for others, they were teaching me to jump out in the snow and start digging as well.
”
”
Michael J Heil (Pursued: God’s relentless pursuit and a drug addict’s journey to finding purpose)
“
For many victims of motor vehicle collisions, the decision whether to pursue an insurance claim or handle their own case can be a difficult one. However, there are numerous reasons why victims of accidents should be represented by a lawyer if they have received a substantial injury such as whiplash. A Car Accident Lawyer Will Explain The Process to You When they hire a car accident lawyer, victims of accidents will immediately receive the assistance and attention they need and deserve. Because most of the details of how car accidents occur are unique and not common knowledge, knowing how to proceed will be the major difference in the outcome of the case. A lawyer who is familiar with how insurance companies operate will know how to negotiate a better settlement with them. During an accident, most insurance companies will want to pay the least amount possible and move on, not even addressing the extent of the damage to the other car or some of the details of the accident. When victims have a lawyer involved, they will not be vulnerable to these tactics.
”
”
The Echavarria Law Firm
“
The game FR Legends MOD APK is all about drifting and racing. You can customize your car and participate in various drift competitions. The game has a variety of cars to choose from, and you can modify them according to your preferences. The game also has different tracks that you can race on, and each track has its own unique challenges.
”
”
frlegendsapp
“
Le coucher de soleil, le printemps, le bleu de la mer, les étoiles de la nuit, toutes ces choses que nous disons captivantes n'ont de magie que lorsqu'elles gravitent autour d'une femme, mon garçon... Car la Beauté, la vrai, l'unique, la beauté phare, la beauté absolue, c'est la femme. Le reste, tout le reste n'est qu'accessoires de charme.
”
”
Yasmina Khadra (Ce que le jour doit Ă  la nuit)
“
At first, they joked about it but as they became more detoxed and more assertive from therapy, paid ironically by the husbands, they began to realize that they each had unique strengths and powers and a burning desire for revenge. Between the Three Wise Women they had an IT expert, an actress and a supermodel, all very wealthy and beautiful. All the three men’s’ brains appeared to reside in their pants and they wondered if they set a honey trap could it possibly work. A plan was proposed by Felicity and she called it Operation Devastation. Angelina would hack into their MIS computer systems, bug their telephones, offices, cars and homes. Ava would seduce Ryan, who owned Novels and the computer firm, Angelina’s husband in a honey trap and get it all on DVD for the divorce court. Then Ava would seduce Felicity’s husband, James, the Irish footballer. Finally, Sean who was Felicity’s friend who was an out of work actor would seduce Patrick
”
”
Annette J. Dunlea
“
Il est donc nĂ©cessaire que les uns et les autres se mettent eux-mĂȘmes Ă  l'Ă©preuve, les uns pour savoir s'ils sont dignes de prĂȘcher et de laisser des Ă©crits ; les autres pour savoir s'ils sont dignes d'Ă©couter et de lire. C'est ainsi qu'aprĂšs avoir, selon la coutume, rompu le pain de l'Eucharistie, on permet Ă  chaque fidĂšle d'en prendre une part; car, pour choisir ou pour rejeter avec raison, la conscience est le meilleur juge. Or, la rĂšgle certaine d'une bonne conscience est une vie droite, jointe Ă  une saine doctrine : suivre l'exemple de ceux qui ont Ă©tĂ© dĂ©jĂ  Ă©prouvĂ©s, et qui se sont conduits avec droiture, c'est la voie la plus sĂ»re pour atteindre Ă  l'intelligence de la vĂ©ritĂ©, et Ă  l'observance des prĂ©ceptes. Quiconque mangera le pain et boira le calice du Seigneur indignement, se rendra coupable du corps et du sang du Seigneur. Que l'homme donc s'Ă©prouve soi-mĂȘme, et qu'aprĂšs cela il mange de ce pain et boive de cette coupe. Il faut donc que celui qui entreprend de prĂȘcher aux autres s'examine pour savoir s'il a en vue l'utilitĂ© du prochain; si ce n'est point avec prĂ©somption, et par esprit de rivalitĂ© ou par amour de la gloire, qu'il rĂ©pand la sainte parole ; s'il se propose pour unique rĂ©compense le salut de ses auditeurs, et s'il n'en flatte aucun ; et enfin s'il Ă©vite toute occasion qui pourrait le faire accuser de vĂ©nalitĂ©.
”
”
Clement of Alexandria (Miscellanies (Stromata))
“
1.​YOUR LOVE RELATIONSHIP. This is the measure of how happy you are in your current state of relationship—whether you’re single and loving it, in a relationship, or desiring one. 2.​YOUR FRIENDSHIPS. This is the measure of how strong a support network you have. Do you have at least five people who you know have your back and whom you love being around? 3.​YOUR ADVENTURES. How much time do you get to travel, experience the world, and do things that open you to new experiences and excitement? 4.​YOUR ENVIRONMENT. This is the quality of your home, your car, your work, and in general the spaces where you spend your time—even when traveling. 5.​YOUR HEALTH AND FITNESS. How would you rate your health, given your age, and any physical conditions? 6.​YOUR INTELLECTUAL LIFE. How much and how fast are you growing and learning? How many books do you read? How many seminars or courses do you take yearly? Education should not stop after you graduate from college. 7.​YOUR SKILLS. How fast are you improving the skills you have that make you unique and help you build a successful career? Are you growing toward mastery or are you stagnating? 8.​YOUR SPIRITUAL LIFE. How much time do you devote to spiritual, meditative, or contemplative practices that keep you feeling connected, balanced, and peaceful? 9.​YOUR CAREER. Are you growing, climbing the ladder, and excelling? Or do you feel you’re stuck in a rut? If you have a business, is it thriving or stagnating? 10.​YOUR CREATIVE LIFE. Do you paint, write, play musical instruments, or engage in any other activity that helps you channel your creativity? Or are you more of a consumer than a creator? 11.​YOUR FAMILY LIFE. Do you love coming home to your family after a hard day’s work? If you’re not married or a parent, define your family as your parents and siblings. 12.​YOUR COMMUNITY LIFE. Are you giving, contributing, and playing a definite role in your community?
”
”
Vishen Lakhiani (The Code of the Extraordinary Mind: 10 Unconventional Laws to Redefine Your Life and Succeed On Your Own Terms)
“
Many gun control academics use language that is hardly scholarly, attacking academics they disagree with as being paid off by the “execrable NRA.” They claim that “gun sellers call the shots at the NRA.”5 They accuse others of having “blood on [their] hands” or being a “blight on democracy.” Apparently, finding evidence of defensive gun uses brings “harm to the democratic process.”6 There are other less obvious claims that are just as outrageous. No, the United States isn’t unique in terms of mass public shootings or homicides. No, gun bans don’t make people safer. Background checks on private transfers haven’t stopped mass public shootings or any other type of crime in the U.S. or other countries. Background checks are racist. And there are real problems with background checks that harm the most vulnerable. Gun control advocates have it backwards when they claim that gun makers have something to learn about how to reduce accidents from looking at government regulation of cars.
”
”
John R. Lott Jr. (The War on Guns: Arming Yourself Against Gun Control Lies)
“
The mechanism of the clock was enclosed in a box resembling a large cupboard, but I was disappointed with the workings. They were much smaller than I had anticipated. The clock was worked by heavy weights suspended on long cables. My father picked up a handle like the crank handle of a car and wound them up. There were two of them. One to work the hands, the other controlling the hammer which struck out the hours on a large bell. Then the mousetraps were set, Not to catch mice, but to control the lighting. Previously my father had to make a special trip each evening to switch on the lights of the clock, returning near midnight to switch them off. To obviate this he invented a method of light control which may have been unique. Two switches, one for switching on and the other for switching off were used. They were fixed on the inside wall of the tower. A mousetrap mounted near each switch was so arranged that when the trap sprung, the arc traversed by the closing trap enabled the switch to be flicked on or off as required. Adjustable sleeves were set along the the cables for required times. The sleeves on the descending cables tripped the mouse traps which actuated the switches.
”
”
William Perry (The End of an Era: Life in Old Eaglehawk and Bendigo)
“
Quand vous parlez d'un projet autour de vous, vous recevez trois types de rĂ©actions : les neutres, les rĂ©actions d'encouragement et les rĂ©actions nĂ©gatives qui tendent Ă  vous faire renoncer.– C'est clair ...– Il faut Ă  tout prix vous Ă©loigner des personnes dont vous sentez qu'elles pourraient vous dĂ©courager. En tout cas, ne leur confiez pas vos projets.– Oui, mais, d'un certain cĂŽtĂ©, cela peut ĂȘtre utile que des gens vous ouvrent les yeux si vous faites fausse route.– Pour cela, adressez-vous uniquement Ă  des connaisseurs dans le domaine qui vous intĂ©resse. Mais il ne faut pas vous confier aux personnes qui chercheraient Ă  vous dĂ©courager juste pour rĂ©pondre Ă  leurs propres besoins psychologiques. Par exemple, il y a des gens qui se sentent mieux quand vous allez mal, et qui font donc tout pour que vous n'alliez pas mieux ! Ou d'autres qui dĂ©testeraient vous voir rĂ©aliser vos rĂȘves car cela leur rappellerait leur absence de courage pour rĂ©aliser les leurs. Il existe aussi des gens qui se sentent valorisĂ©s par vos difficultĂ©s parce que cela leur donne l'occasion de vous aider. Dans ce cas, les projets qui viennent de vous leur coupent l'herbe sous le pied, et ils feront ce qu'ils peuvent pour vous en dissuader. Cela nĂ© sert Ă  rien de leur en vouloir car ils font cela inconsciemment. Mais il est prĂ©fĂ©rable de ne pas leur confier vos plans. Ils vous feraient perdre votre confiance en vous. Vous vous souvenez qu'hier nous avons parlĂ© du bĂ©bĂ© qui apprend Ă  marcher et ne se dĂ©courage jamais, malgrĂ© ses Ă©checs Ă  rĂ©pĂ©tition ?– Oui.– S'il persĂ©vĂšre et finit par rĂ©ussir, c'est notamment parce que aucun parent au monde ne doute de la capacitĂ© de son enfant Ă  marcher, et aucune personne au monde ne va le dĂ©courager dans ses tentatives. Alors qu'une fois adulte, nombreux seront les gens qui vont le dissuader de rĂ©aliser ses rĂȘves. pensez Ă  quelqu'un de plus Ă©loignĂ©, peut-ĂȘtre un aĂŻeul ou un ami d'enfance, mĂȘme si vous ne le voyez pas souvent. Si vraiment vous ne trouvez pas, vous pouvez aussi penser Ă  une personne disparue, qui vous a aimĂ© de son vivant. Pensez Ă  elle et dites-vous: « Je sais que lĂ  oĂč elle est, si elle me voit monter ce projet, elle croit en moi.» DĂšs que vous avez des doutes, pensez Ă  elle et voyez-la vous encourager car elle sait que vous allez rĂ©ussir. Il y a aussi des gens qui croient en Dieu et obtiennent de lui la force d'agir. NapolĂ©on Ă©tait, quant Ă  lui, convaincu qu'il avait une bonne Ă©toile. Lors de la plupart de ses batailles, mĂȘme lorsqu'elles Ă©taient mal engagĂ©es, il restait persuadĂ© qu'il gagnerait, avec l'aide de cette bonne Ă©toile. Cela l'a Ă©normĂ©ment stimulĂ© et lui a fourni un courage souvent dĂ©terminant.
”
”
Laurent Gounelle
“
Richard Kay Richard Kay became friends with Diana, Princess of Wales, through his job as royal correspondent for London’s Daily Mail. After her separation in 1992, he used his knowledge to give a penetrating and unique insight into Diana’s troubled life, and they remained friends until the end. Richard is now diary editor or the Daily Mail and lives in London with his wife and three children. Over the years, I saw her at her happiest and in her darkest moments. There were moments of confusion and despair when I believed Diana was being driven by the incredible pressures made on her almost to the point of destruction. She talked of being strengthened by events, and anyone could see how the bride of twenty had grown into a mature woman, but I never found her strong. She was as unsure of herself at her death as when I first talked to her on that airplane, and she wanted reassurance about the role she was creating for herself. In private, she was a completely different person form the manicured clotheshorse that the public’s insatiable demand for icons had created. She was natural and witty and did a wonderful impression of the Queen. This was the person, she told me, that she would have been all the time if she hadn’t married into the world’s most famous family. What she hated most of all was being called “manipulative” and privately railed against those who used the word to describe her. “They don’t even know me,” she would say bitterly, sitting cross-legged on the floor of her apartment in Kensington Palace and pouring tea from a china pot. It was this blindness, as she saw it, to what she really was that led her seriously to consider living in another country where she hoped she would be understood. The idea first emerged in her mind about three years before her death. “I’ve got to find a place where I can have peace of mind,” she said to me. She considered France, because I was near enough to stay in close touch with William and Harry. She thought of America because she--naively, it must be said--saw it as a country so brimming over with glittery people and celebrities that she would be able to “disappear.” She also thought of South Africa, where her brother, Charles, made a home, and even Australia, because it was the farthest place she could think of from the seat of her unhappiness. But that would have separated her form her sons. Everyone said she would go anywhere, do anything, to have her picture taken, but in my view the truth was completely different. A good day for her was one where her picture was not taken and the paparazzi photographers did not pursue her and clamber over her car. “Why are they so obsessed with me?” she would ask me. I would try to explain, but I never felt she fully understood. Millions of women dreamed of changing places with her, but the Princess that I knew yearned for the ordinary humdrum routine of their lives. “They don’t know how lucky they are,” she would say. On Saturday, just before she was joined by Dodi Al Fayed for their last fateful dinner at the Ritz in Pairs, she told me how fed up she was being compared with Camilla. “It’s all so meaningless,” she said. She didn’t say--she never said--whether she thought Charles and Camilla should marry. Then, knowing that as a journalist I often work at weekends, she said to me, “Unplug your phone and get a good night’s sleep.
”
”
Larry King (The People's Princess: Cherished Memories of Diana, Princess of Wales, From Those Who Knew Her Best)
“
On a coutume, dans le monde occidental, de considĂ©rer l’islamisme comme une tradition essentiellement guerriĂšre et, par suite, lorsqu’il y est question notamment du sabre ou de l’épĂ©e (es-sayf), de prendre ce mot uniquement dans son sens le plus littĂ©ral, sans mĂȘme penser jamais Ă  se demander s’il n’y a pas lĂ  en rĂ©alitĂ© quelque chose d’autre. Il n’est d’ailleurs pas contestable qu’un certain cĂŽtĂ© guerrier existe dans l’islamisme, et aussi que, loin de constituer un caractĂšre particulier Ă  celui-ci, il se retrouve tout aussi bien dans la plupart des autres traditions, y compris le christianisme. Sans mĂȘme rappeler que le Christ lui-mĂȘme a dit : « Je ne suis pas venu apporter la paix, mais l’épĂ©e », ce qui peut en somme s’entendre figurativement, l’histoire de la ChrĂ©tientĂ© au moyen Ăąge, c’est-Ă -dire Ă  l’époque oĂč elle eut sa rĂ©alisation effective dans les institutions sociales, en fournit des preuves largement suffisantes ; et, d’autre part, la tradition hindoue elle-mĂȘme, qui certes ne saurait passer pour spĂ©cialement guerriĂšre, puisqu’on tend plutĂŽt en gĂ©nĂ©ral Ă  lui reprocher de n’accorder que peu de place Ă  l’action, contient pourtant aussi cet aspect, comme on peut s’en rendre compte en lisant la BhagavadgĂźtĂą. À moins d’ĂȘtre aveuglĂ© par certains prĂ©jugĂ©s, il est facile de comprendre qu’il en soit ainsi, car dans le domaine social, la guerre, en tant qu’elle est dirigĂ©e contre ceux qui troublent l’ordre et qu’elle a pour but de les y ramener, constitue une fonction lĂ©gitime, qui n’est au fond qu’un des aspects de la fonction de « justice » entendue dans son acception la plus gĂ©nĂ©rale. Cependant, ce n’est lĂ  que le cĂŽtĂ© le plus extĂ©rieur des choses, donc le moins essentiel : au point de vue traditionnel, ce qui donne Ă  la guerre ainsi comprise toute sa valeur, c’est qu’elle symbolise la lutte que l’homme doit mener contre les ennemis qu’il porte en lui-mĂȘme, c’est-Ă -dire contre tous les Ă©lĂ©ments qui, en lui, sont contraires Ă  l’ordre et Ă  l’unitĂ©. Dans les deux cas, du reste, et qu’il s’agisse de l’ordre extĂ©rieur et social ou de l’ordre intĂ©rieur et spirituel, la guerre doit toujours tendre Ă©galement Ă  Ă©tablir l’équilibre et l’harmonie (et c’est pourquoi elle se rapporte proprement Ă  la « justice »), et Ă  unifier par lĂ  d’une certaine façon la multiplicitĂ© des Ă©lĂ©ments en opposition entre eux. Cela revient Ă  dire que son aboutissement normal, et qui est en dĂ©finitive son unique raison d’ĂȘtre, c’est la paix (es-salĂąm), laquelle ne peut ĂȘtre obtenue vĂ©ritablement que par la soumission Ă  la volontĂ© divine (el-islĂąm), mettant chacun des Ă©lĂ©ments Ă  sa place pour les faire tous concourir Ă  la rĂ©alisation consciente d’un mĂȘme plan ; et il est Ă  peine besoin de faire remarquer combien, dans la langue arabe, ces deux termes, el-islĂąm et es-salĂąm, sont Ă©troitement apparentĂ©s l’un Ă  l’autre.
”
”
René Guénon (Symbols of Sacred Science)
“
Carly went back and forth between several of the paintings, trying to decide which one was least likely to frighten small children. “You know, your work is very 
 unique, Hazel. I can honestly say I’ve never seen anything quite like it.
”
”
Mariah Stewart (On Sunset Beach (Chesapeake Diaries. #8))