Simulation Hypothesis Quotes

But I was beginning to learn that your life is a story told about you, not one that you tell. Of course, you pretend to be the author. You have to. You think, I now choose to go to lunch, when that monotone beep rings from on high at 12:37. But really, the bell decides. You think you're the painter, but you're the canvas.

Simulations are your brain’s guesses of what’s happening in the world. In every waking moment, you’re faced with ambiguous, noisy information from your eyes, ears, nose, and other sensory organs. Your brain uses your past experiences to construct a hypothesis—the simulation—and compares it to the cacophony arriving from your senses. In this manner, simulation lets your brain impose meaning on the noise, selecting what’s relevant and ignoring the rest.

When I woke up one morning I got poetically epiphanized: To us, our dreams at night feel “oh so real” when inside them but they are what they are - dreams against the backdrop of daily reality. Our daily reality is like nightly dreams against the backdrop of the larger reality. This is something we all know deep down to be true... The question then becomes how to "lucidify" this dream of reality?

Many of the world’s religious traditions tell us that the world around us is an illusion created for our benefit.

Think of how holograms and virtual reality have evolved, even just in the past few years. If we can run fairly convincing simulations of reality now, think of what those simulations will be like in a century or two. The idea with the simulation hypothesis is, we can’t rule out the possibility that all of reality is a simulation.

Our reality is similar to the brain-in-a-vat hypothesis; we live in a simulated world, but it is not in a computer—it is in our head.

Your mind is real, materiality is simulated.

Is the universe holographic? Probably. Get microscopic enough and you start seeing pixels. I don’t know about you, but that makes me laugh. Until I think about how easy it is to hack a program. Any program.

That's all it is. Information. Even a simulated experience or a dream is simultaneous reality and fantasy. Any way you look at it, all the information that a person accumulates in a lifetime is just a drop in the bucket.

Sliding Doors and Run Lola Run (1998)—These two movies, neither of which is technically science fiction, were released in the same year. We see the idea of timelines branching from a single point which lead to different outcomes. In the example of Sliding Doors, a separate timeline branches off of the first timeline and then exists in parallel for some time, overlapping the main timeline, before merging back in. In Run Lola Run, on the other hand, we see Lola trying to rescue her boyfriend Manni by rewinding what happened and making different choices multiple times. We see visually what running our Core Loop might look like in a real-world, high-stress situation.

War, famine, disease, genocide. Death, in a million different forms, often painful and protracted for the poor individual wretches involved. What god would so arrange the universe to predispose its creations to experience such suffering, or be the cause of it in others? What master of simulations or arbitrator of a game would set up the initial conditions to the same pitiless effect? God or programmer, the charge would be the same: that of near-infinitely sadistic cruelty; deliberate, premeditated barbarism on an unspeakably horrific scale.” Hyrlis looked expectantly at them. “You see?” he said. “By this reasoning we must, after all, be at the most base level of reality – or at the most exalted, however one wishes to look at it. Just as reality can blithely exhibit the most absurd coincidences that no credible fiction could convince us of, so only reality – produced, ultimately, by matter in the raw – can be so unthinkingly cruel. Nothing able to think, nothing able to comprehend culpability, justice or morality could encompass such purposefully invoked savagery without representing the absolute definition of evil. It is that unthinkingness that saves us. And condemns us, too, of course; we are as a result our own moral agents, and there is no escape from that responsibility, no appeal to a higher power that might be said to have artificially constrained or directed us.

There is the explanation that is put in the language of the mysteries, that we men are in a kind of prison, and that one must not free oneself or run away. That seems to me an impressive doctrine and one not easy to understand fully. However, Cebes, this seems to me well expressed, that the gods are our guardians and that men are one of their possessions. Or do you not think so?

The next major technological platform for creative expansion of the mind will be cyberspace, or more specifically the Metaverse, a functional successor to today’s 2D Internet, with virtual places instead of Webpages. The Internet and smartphones have enabled the rapid and cheap sharing of information, immersive computing will be able to provide the same for experiences. That means that just as we can read, listen to, and watch videos of anything we want today, soon we’ll be able to experience stunning lifelike simulations in virtual reality indistinguishable from our physical world. We’ll be walking and actively interacting in the Metaverse, not slavishly staring at the flat screens. We would be able to turn our minds inside out and show our dreams to each other in this ecstadelic matrix of our own making.

As flat as the earth before they noticed it was round. As ambiguous as the truth before they noticed it was true. As real as reality before they noticed it didn't exist. As beautiful as a woman before they noticed she wasn't one. And is the earth really round? It is when seen from another world. Just as the real is real only from our phenomenal point of view. Or, rather, from the viewpoint of the unverifiable hypothesis of its non- existence.

The immateriality of signs is alien to me, as it is to a race of peasants with whom I share an obsessional morality, a sluggishness, a stupid, ancestral belief in the real. In reality, I am one of them. The simulation hypothesis is merely a maximalist position. The seduction hypothesis is merely a formal abstraction. It is the phantom of seduction which obsesses me—as for the rest, I have never managed anything other than to let myself be seduced. And this is quite alright: all the rest is merely destructive, moral passion. The seducing monk dreams of Manichean tension between the sign and the real as the most sublime form of morality. Only from time to time, the earth-shattering, hypothetical union of the two… Even then, the beauty of the violent resolution eludes him. Faith and fury first attack the impossibility of believing; they attack signs. Annihilating the world as sign, in order to make it an object of belief.

Eyebrows were raised in 1994 when Peter Shor, working at Bell Labs, came up with a quantum algorithm that could break most modern encryption by using quantum computing algorithms. Today’s encryption is based on the difficulty of factoring large numbers. Even today, although there are no quantum computers that can implement Shor’s algorithm in full yet, there is worry that most of our encryption will be broken in a few years as more capable quantum computers come along. When this happens, there will be a rush to quantum-safe encryption algorithms (which cannot be broken quickly by either classic or quantum computers).

So the world, then, is a radical illusion. That is, at least, one hypothesis. At all events, it is an unbearable one. And to keep it at bay, we have to realize the world, give it force of reality, make it exist and signify at all costs, take from it its secret, arbitrary, accidental character, rid it of appearances and extract its meaning, divert it from all predestination and restore it to its end and its maximum efficacy, wrest it from its form to deliver it up to its formula. This gigantic enterprise of disillusionment -- of, literally, putting the illusion of the world to death, to leave an absolutely real world in its stead -- is what is properly meant by simulation.

The lack of distinction between the real and the virtual is the obsession of our age. Everything in our current affairs attests to this, not to mention the big cinematic productions: The Truman Show, Total Recall, Existenz, Matrix, etc. This question has always been there behind literature and philosophy, but it has been present metaphorically, as it were, implicitly, through the filter of discourse. The 'encoding/decoding' of reality was done by discourse, that is to say, by a highly complex medium, never leaving room for a head-on truth. The encoding/decoding of our reality is done by technology. Only what is produced by this technical effect acquires visible reality. And it does so at the cost of a simplification that no longer has anything to do with language or with the slightest ambivalence and which, therefore, puts an end to this subtle lack of distinction between the real and the virtual, as subtle as the lack of distinction between good and evil. Through special effects, everything acquires an operational self-evidence, a spectacular reality that is, properly speaking, the reign of simulation. What the directors of these films have not realized (any more than the simulationist artists of New York in the eighties) is that simulation is a hypothesis, a game that turns reality itself into one eventuality among others.

Such is the paradox of all thought which disputes the validity of the real: when it sees itself robbed of its own concept. Events, bereft of meaning in themselves, steal meaning from us. They adapt to the most fantastical hypotheses, just as natural species and viruses adapt to the most hostile environments. They have an extraordinary mimetic capacity: no longer is it theories which adapt to events, but the reverse. And, in so doing, they mystify us, for a theory which is verified is no longer a theory. It's terrifying to see the idea coincide with the reality. These are the death-throes of the concept. The epiphany of the real is the twilight of its concept. We have lost that lead which ideas had over the world, that distance which meant that an idea remained an idea. Thought has to be exceptional, anticipatory and at the margin -- has to be the projected shadow of future events. Today, we are lagging behind events. They may sometimes give the impression of receding; in fact, they passed us long ago. The simulated disorder of things has moved faster than we have. The reality effect has succumbed to acceleration --anamorphosis of speed. Events, in their being, are never behind themselves, are always out ahead of their meaning. Hence the delay of interpretation, which is now merely the retrospective form of the unforeseeable event.

If the Chrysalis Conjecture is correct, we are alone in our dimensional cocoon-universe, simulated in Absolute Consciousness, but not alone in the Multiverse.

The Digital Pantheism argument rests on identifying certain features of reality and claiming that these features are a consequence of our reality being a computational simulation of a special emergent kind. We, as avatars of the greater cosmic mind, are instrumental for bringing the finite experience of reality out of absolute infinity.

Aliens (intermediate programmers) are not creating computer games in the ordinary sense of the term. These games are more like works of art, improvisational theater, performance art, scientific and philosophic investigation and historical novels.

How can intermediate level beings see or experience this artificial life? The answer is that we already have virtual reality goggles through which we can view, in three dimensions, sporting events on the opposite side of the world. Today you can purchase equipment that enables you to watch and listen to a professional basketball game that takes place in the United States while you are in your bedroom in Japan, wearing the virtual reality goggles and headphones. Imagine the authenticity, accuracy and realism of virtual reality that a civilization a thousand years more advanced than us can produce!

We would have the overwhelming impression that we were re-living the present—déjà vu—perhaps in precisely the same way: hearing the same words, saying the same words. I submit that these impressions are valid and significant, and I will even say this: such an impression is a clue, that in some past time-point, a variable was changed—re-programmed as it were—and that because of this, an alternative world branched off.

What is amazing to me is not so much Turing’s imaginary construct but his hypothesis that there is only one type of universal computing machine. As far as we know, no device built in the physical universe can have any more computational power than a Turing machine. To put it more precisely, any computation that can be performed by any physical computing device can be performed by any universal computer, as long as the latter has sufficient time and memory. This is a remarkable statement, suggesting as it does that a universal computer with the proper programming should be able to simulate the function of a human brain.

Origin-of-life simulation experiments increasingly suggested that simple chemicals do not arrange themselves into complex information-bearing molecules, nor do they move in life-relevant directions—unless, that is, biochemists actively and intelligently guide the process.

Initially, von Neumann was referring to physical machines. The idea that he first presented in a lecture in Pasadena, California, in the 1940s was very complicated. Stephen Levy, in his book, Artificial Life, describes the basic components that made up von Neumann’s theoretical self-replicating machines, which he called kinematics (but which are mostly called von Neumann machines today). The system consisted of raw materials in a lake, along with four components required for this self-replicating machine labelled: A, B, C, and D. Component A was like a factory, which scooped up raw materials from the lake and used them in ways that were dictated by some data, which we might call a computer program today. Component B was a duplicator that read and copied information from the first machine to its duplicates, in the same way that DNA is passed down from parents to children. Component C was like a computer and controlled who did what, like a central processing unit. Component D was the actual data, or instructions, which in those days von Neumann envisioned as a very long tape.

Today’s 3D printers have started to make a dent in von Neumann’s vision. They are now being used to assemble objects in space from raw materials. This is seen as a critical way we might be able to conduct manufacturing on foreign worlds, as long as raw materials are available. Theoretically, a 3D printer could print another 3D printer, thus realizing von Neumann’s general idea of self-replicating machines.

Most scientists, certainly physicists, conflate the two ideas of randomness and free will. Horgan argues that free will, as we think of it, is about more: “They examine free will within the narrow, reductionistic framework of physics and mathematics, and they equate free will with randomness and unpredictability. My choices, at least important ones, are not random, and they are all too predictable, at least for those who know me.

Many adherents of the simulation hypothesis think that quantum indeterminacy is simply an optimization technique with the same basic idea: only render that which is being observed so that not every particle in the whole universe has to be rendered at one time, only those which are being observed. Everything else is in a state of superposition, or stored simply as information. If there’s one thought I want to leave you with about computer science and information theory, it’s that optimization of information is one of the key ways in which we accomplish seemingly impossible things. A more detailed overview of both quantum indeterminacy and quantum entanglement as optimization techniques is given in The Simulation Hypothesis.

The Thirteenth Floor (1999)— As mentioned in the previous chapter this film is one of the best representations of ancestor simulations. When the protagonist finds out he is living in a simulation, one of the RPG players, who exists outside the simulation, tells him that their simulation is “one of thousands.” The thing that makes this simulation unique is that it is the only one where they in turn develop their own ancestor simulations, or nested simulations. Although we see only the nested simulations and not the parallel ones, they are definitely there, which means that it is also faithfully representing a simulated multiverse.

Fringe (2008–2013) and Counterpart (2017–2018)— In the twenty-first century, two popular TV shows demonstrate the idea of a single parallel world that has somehow split off from this world, but retains many similarities, including a shared history. The source of the divergence is never explained fully, but the existence of a parallel world with alternate versions of the main characters is a key plot point in both. Both shows reveal that some physics phenomenon was responsible for either (1) breaching a way into the other universe or (2) causing a branch off the main universe to create the second one.

Sliders (1995) —The science fiction series Sliders is a more direct example of navigating a quantum multiverse. In Sliders, wormholes are used to visit other universes, each of which deviates in some way from our own, many with different versions of the main characters. How do they develop the wormhole? Quinn, the main character, is shown how by a different, parallel version of himself, a theme we will see repeating in other multiverse stories.

Dark Matter (2017) — In a similar manner, the hero of the novel Dark Matter, Jason Dissen, a failed quantum physicist who is happy with this life, encounters an alternate version of himself. This alternate version was more successful as a physicist and developed a machine which can put large objects into superposition (a concept we’ll explore heavily in the next few chapters). This device results in an ability to go to different universes and encounter alternate versions of well, everyone. The other Jason, the brilliant one, is keen on stealing the hero Jason’s happy home life. Chaos ensues. This is well worth a read if you are inclined to read novels and want to consider the possibilities of multiversal travel.

The idea of cosmological inflation, or just inflation for short, was proposed by Alan Guth, now a physics professor from MIT, while he was working at the Stanford Linear Accelerator with his colleagues as a way to solve a number of problems with the existing theories of the origins of the universe. 57 The basic idea is that this inflationary period began very soon after the Big Bang (in this case, I mean very soon, from approximately 10-36 seconds after the to 10-32 seconds). That means the whole process of cosmic inflation started and ended before a single second had passed from the Big Bang! The insight that Guth and his colleagues

The idea of cosmological inflation, or just inflation for short, was proposed by Alan Guth, now a physics professor from MIT, while he was working at the Stanford Linear Accelerator with his colleagues as a way to solve a number of problems with the existing theories of the origins of the universe. 57 The basic idea is that this inflationary period began very soon after the Big Bang (in this case, I mean very soon, from approximately 10-36 seconds after the to 10-32 seconds). That means the whole process of cosmic inflation started and ended before a single second had passed from the Big Bang! The insight that Guth and his colleagues had was that there was a period of repulsive gravity.

The second is that far from living in a single universe, we live in a complex, interconnected network of multiple timelines. This concept is broadly referred to today as the multiverse. Not only does the multiverse warp our understanding of the world around us, it also warps our understanding of the past and the future. In short, neither space nor time is what we think it is.

The multiverse idea is so common now in the world of physics that physicists have proposed not just one but many types of multiverses. The one that was most interesting to me, given my previous research into simulation theory, was the many-worlds interpretation (MWI) of quantum physics, also known as the parallel universe theory, or the quantum multiverse for short. It is a well-respected explanation for the mystifying phenomenon of quantum indeterminacy by many physicists. In this interpretation, the universe is spinning off new branches every time a quantum measurement is made, resulting in an almost infinite number of parallel universes with some level of shared history.

In just one example of such an attempt to update the metaphor, the Mormon Transhumanist Association has put forth the New God Argument, which argues that we are in a simulation of some sort and that this is not in conflict with their faith (the Church of Latter Day Saints). This is an explicit attempt for existing religions to stay on top of the theological implications of the development of technology and the simulation hypothesis.

It is probably true quite generally that in the history of human thinking the most fruitful developments frequently take place at those points where two different lines of thought meet. These lines may have their root in quite different parts of human culture, in different times or different cultural environments or different religious traditions; hence, if they actually meet … then one may hope that new and interesting developments will follow.66 —Werner Heisenberg, Nobel Prize Winner in Physics

In fact, this is where Wheeler’s later insight, that the universe consists of information (“it from bit”), seems to tie surprisingly in with the simulation hypothesis and to the quantum multiverse. It is much easier to think of cloning the information of a universe than it is to think of cloning the actual universe.

The only mechanism we know of that allows us to run the universe multiple times would be a simulated universe. If run on a type of computer, would allow us to run multiple scenarios either serially or in parallel.

Ironically, in the simulation hypothesis there’s now one thing that’s indisputable: Man really is the creation of a higher intelligence. But who would be prepared to adore the creator of a colossal role-playing game?

Are We Living in a Simulation? We’ve just seen how the Mathematical Universe Hypothesis changes our perspective on many fundamental questions

The wave of our consciousness continuum contains all of our experiences in this life and in our past lives in an infinitely complex web…”52

Either a true accident, then, bearing witness to the effective virulence of such viruses, or a total simulation, showing that the most effective strategy today is calculated destabilization and deception. The verdict is not yet in. Even if the hypothesis of an experimental simulation were to be confirmed, moreover, this would in no way guarantee that the process involved was under control. A test virus can always turn into a killer virus. No one can control chain reactions of this kind, and any simulated accident is potentially an accident of simulation. What is more, we know that any natural accident or catastrophe may be claimed as a terrorist act, and vice versa. There is no limit here to the hyperbole of hypotheses. It is in this respect, in fact, that the whole system is globally terroristic. A greater terror than the terror of violence and accident is the terror of uncertainty and dissuasion.

If the universe is an artificial simulation then the mathematics is its code and a physicist is a programmer.

That's all it is. Information. Even a simulated experience or a dream is simultaneous reality and fantasy. Any way you look at it, all the information that a person accumulates in a lifetime is just a drop in the bucket.

When I was at MIT, one of the most important lessons I learned about science was that it wasn’t meant to describe reality exactly but rather to come up with a set of workable models that could approximate reality under certain conditions. The models needed to be reliable and fit the existing data.

...the inability to reconcile quantum physics with classical physics is the same ‘red light indicator’ that the world Steve lives in is a construct or a simulation.

Bostrom’s conclusion is that if any society ever makes it to the simulation point, then it is more likely that we are already inside a simulation!

According to the threat-simulation hypothesis, dreams evolved to serve an important psychological function: they let us work through our anxieties in a low-risk environment, helping us practice for stressful events and cope with grief and trauma. Most of the emotions we experience in dreams, as Finnish scientist Antti Revonsuo noted in the 1990s, are negative; the most common ones are fear, helplessness, anxiety, and guilt.

The simulation hypothesis, in other words, could explain why our universe is imbued with discernible patterns and mathematical regularities while also explaining how those patterns could be rooted in something more than mere abstractions

Είμαστε έτοιμοι να διαστρέψουμε την πραγματικότητα αν το διακύβευμα είναι να μην ηττηθούμε ολοσχερώς. Θέλουμε απάντηση στο παραμικρό άγχος μας, κι έναν τρόπο να σκεφτόμαστε τον κόσμο χωρίς να τίθενται υπό αμφισβήτηση οι αξίες μας, τα συναισθήματα μας, οι πράξεις μας. Πάρτε την κλιματική αλλαγή. Δεν ακούμε ποτέ τους επιστήμονες. Εκπέμπουμε ξέφρενα εικονικό άνθρακα από ορυκτές πηγές ενέργειας, εικονικές ή μη, αναθαιρμένουμε την ατμόσφαιρά μας, εικονική ή μη, και το είδος μας, πάντα εικονικό ή μη, θα εκλείψει. Τίποτα δεν κινείται. Οι πλούσιοι το' χουν σίγουρο πως θα τη γλιτώσουν, μόνοι τους, ενάντια σε κάθε λογική, και οι άλλοι περιορίζονται να ελπίζουν.

Under the simulation hypothesis, computations evolve our Universe, but under the MUH they merely describe it by evaluating its relations.

There is no such thing as complete extinction or a final death. In order to create a simulation of extinction to experience the “second death,” a reality must be created that severs all ties to divine love in which divine love can be controlled without having to feel remorse for controlling and manipulating this frequency.

Earth is a machine-like simulation that depends on humans creating emotions with their Shadow Bodies in order to suck divine love into this simulated reality. If you are enlightened, you cannot be controlled thus intruder races focused on DNA tampering in order to create amnesia of god realization and forgetfulness of your Higher Self aspects.

On Ballard: 'It is no longer to fabricate the unreal from the real, the imaginary from the givens of the real. The process will, rather, be the opposite: it will be to put decentred situations, models of simulation in place and to contrive to give them the feeling of the real ... to reinvent the real as fiction. ' Artificial intelligence is an asexual activity, in which the body is only there, as Turing says, to give the 'intelligence' something to occupy itself with. The spiritual practice of evil- sin, destiny, punishment, death - is over. The spiritual practice of crime is over. We are now in the political economy of misfortune.

There are the lower level gods and goddesses, who dwell in the lower astral realm, such as those found in belief systems such as Santeria, Vodun, Palo Mayombe (or Palo Mallombe), Santa Muerte, Candomblé, Esú or Eshú (in Yoruba language "sphere"), Kimbanda and Ifa. There are also intermediate spirits such as saints, angels and archangels; and a still higher being called by various names such as: Yahweh, El and Allah, who is the Demiurge. The programmers of this simulation also created demons and fallen angels.

Because there are many levels in this gigantic video game, people pray to the beings on the lower and intermediate levels, as they are often easier to contact than the more exalted beings (for example, these lower and intermediate beings often respond to human and animal blood sacrifice, offerings of large amounts of gold or money, flagellation, fasting and other offerings of material goods such as flowers, food and incense. They hope that, by petitioning the beings on the intermediate level (saints, angels and archangels), their request will be transmitted to the Supreme Reality (the ultimate controller of the game). In other words, in reality people are asking the intermediate level of programmers to change the program. When people pray for a miracle, they are really praying that the computer code of one of the levels will change to give them what they want. They are trying to contact and influence the intermediate programmers when they pray.

We are faced, ultimately, with two irreconcilable hypotheses: that of the extermination of all the world's illusion by technology and the virtual, or that of an ironic destiny of all science and all knowledge in which the world -- and the illusion of the world -- would survive. The hypothesis of a `transcendental' irony of technology being by definition unverifiable, we have to hold to these two irreconcilable and simultaneously `true' perspectives. There is nothing which allows us to decide between them. As Wittgenstein says: `The world is everything which is the case'.

If there are other dimensions, then those extra dimensions will be symmetrically similar to our current three dimensions.

Why market economy doesn’t do what it is supposed to do – self regulate. Reward the hard-working and punish lazy ones.

This was a different kind of poor compared to the primarily drug and laziness induced poor of the US.

The United States was very successful historically, and it is a  true democracy

romantic optimist,

The brain is nothing more than a device that takes disorganized data and draws conclusions,” continued Tom.

What kind of sadistic God would allow for all this to happen?” thought Robbie with anger, “What is the reason to live if we all die anyway sooner or later?

There are many ’Whys’ and very few answers.

They learn from childhood how to be noble, to be honest, and responsible for their actions; otherwise, their family history will be tainted forever.

Many of the confounding aspects of quantum physics are confounding only if we insist on a completely deterministic, materialist model of the universe, with a single past and a single future. The observer effect, the collapse of the probability wave, even parallel universes all make much more sense if the universe actually consists of information that is stored, processed, duplicated, and, most important, rendered as the physical world we see around us.

One of the first things Tessa asked me was whether I had seen the whole Metz speech, not just the famous quote, which she repeated word for word:4 We are living in a computer-programmed reality, and the only clue we have to it is when some variable is changed, and some alteration in our reality occurs.

Remember back to Bostrom’s startling simulation argument: if any civilization ever gets to the Simulation Point, then we are already likely in a simulation.

It is better succeed in small than fail in big.

It is better to succeed in small than fail in big.

The best we can do is to observe shadows of the real world because we cannot perceive it directly

The metaphor of multiple lives entered the video game world well after the Eastern doctrines of reincarnation and its concept of multiple lives. It’s not clear whether the original moniker of “multiple lives” in video games had any connection with multiple lives in Eastern spiritual traditions.

A rainbow is computer code in the sky. It is the subroutines of sunshine and the classifications of colour.

Humans enjoy being Gods.

Commie Capitalism

We are completely dependent on Mitras.

cheese holes

ball.

We hope you can solve the mystery of the real world. Why God created Ether and Mitras in it? What is, so to speak, the purpose of life here?” said Newton looking at Robbie with hope.

The purpose of life in any world is to create,” said Robbie. Newton looked at Robbie seriously and said nothing.

Robbie still didn’t see any shadows,

Soccer is a very different game. It is mostly about skill and speed. Let’s see how they perform,

When talking to them, just say you are ready to help with any assignment and that you accepted your destiny,” said Katie.

It is a senseless and cruel world,” answered Katie without turning.

The time is spent here not as much on the size of an object as on the details.

The ability to have a choice is a wonderful gift we have, which is worth living for,

Bostrom’s simulation hypothesis itself, where humans – or possibly post-humans – are extremely interested in ancestral simulations (as we already are) and able to create ones containing conscious beings.

Therefore, what we think of as a physical body can really be expressed as information that is interpreted by a biological printing process to create cells that are assembled into larger abstractions called living organisms!