Short Litigation Quotes

The state is controlling my destiny and my penis.

As one leading Supreme Court scholar, Sanford Levinson, has noted, Supreme Court cases necessarily deal only with the “litigated Constitution,” those provisions that are open to interpretation and become fodder for lawyers and judges.

L'amore sopra ogni cosa. L'amore prima del tempo, dei battiti, dei pianti, dei sospiri, dei drammi, delle litigate, della rabbia che prende il sopravvento, degli ostacoli insormontabili, dei sacrifici. Un amore che cura. Un amore che ti mantiene in vita.

As one leading Supreme Court scholar, Sanford Levinson, has noted, Supreme Court cases necessarily deal only with the “litigated Constitution,” those provisions that are open to interpretation and become fodder for lawyers and judges. At the same time, the “hard-wired Constitution,” structural elements of great significance like the over-representation of small states in the United States Senate, remain beyond the reach of any court. “The fixation on the litigated Constitution,” Levinson writes, leads people to “overestimate the importance of courts and judges, for good and for ill.

The Vishnu Purana states that, the Kali Yuga will be characterized by: “Kings of churlish spirit, violent temper, and ever addicted to falsehood and wickedness. They will inflict death on women, children, and cows; they will seize upon the property of their subjects; they will be of limited power, and will for the most part rapidly rise and fall; their lives will be short, their desires insatiable, and they will display but little piety. Wealth and piety will decrease day by day, until the world will be wholly depraved. Then property alone will confer rank; wealth will be the only source of devotion; passion will be the sole bond of union between the sexes; falsehood will be the only means of success in litigation; and women will be objects merely of sensual gratification. Earth will be venerated but for its mineral treasures. Dishonesty will be the universal means of subsistence; menace and presumption will be substituted for learning. The people, unable to bear the heavy burdens imposed upon them by their avaricious sovereigns, will take refuge amongst the valleys of the mountains, and will be glad to feed upon wild honey, herbs, roots, fruits, flowers, and leaves. Thus in the Kali age shall decay constantly proceed, until the human race approaches its annihilation.

As has been the case far too often in the Obama administration, which may go down as the least transparent administration in history, the IRS refused to respond to our FOIA requests. Judicial Watch was forced to sue the IRS in federal court in October 2013, shortly after Lois Lerner had “retired” to avoid the consequences of her actions. Judicial Watch’s efforts through these FOIA requests and subsequent litigation led to the discovery that in addition to targeting conservatives at the IRS, Lois Lerner sent confidential taxpayer information to attorneys at the Federal Election Commission, which enforces federal campaign finance rules, in violation of federal law. Email communications revealed that Lerner, who formerly worked at the Federal Election Commission (FEC), sent extensive materials on conservative organizations—the American Issues Project and Citizens for the Republic—to the FEC, including detailed confidential information, after inquiries from the FEC attorneys. She disclosed this information in spite of Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, which bars the IRS from sending such information to anyone, including other federal agencies. It also turned out that the FEC attorneys were acting without authority to make such an inquiry, because the commissioners who run the agency had never approved an investigation. The emails discovered by Judicial Watch provided a disturbing window into the activities of two out-of-control federal agencies, whose employees, because of their political bias, were trying to target conservative organizations.

might come up about “bias based on experiences.” A list of qualities RBG drew up to describe herself sold the star litigator rather short. It focused not on her brilliant strategy or accomplishments but on her “high capacity for sustained work—accustomed to long hours, homework, extending day as long as necessary to accomplish task needed to be done.” She bloodlessly referred to her “high quality standards for own work product” (“my own sternest critic”) and put near the bottom that she was a “good (sympathetic) listener.

I hope you will not be tempted into litigation. Life is too short for that.

Thus far, Trump’s bet has paid off to an astonishing degree. Nobody has taken up his dares. Congress has done little, though it may be beginning to stir. The courts, limited by the slow pace of litigation and legitimate substantive and procedural legal barriers to action, offer little short-term relief. So far, anyway, the only real pushback has come from prosecutors and state attorneys general who have probed the conduct of his campaign and foundation. And it has come from a dogged and relentless press, which has accomplished a great deal of disclosure—disclosure that, in turn, gives rise to the possibility of political response. As other billionaires eye the presidency, it’s not hard to imagine them following the example of minimal ethical compliance and preserving their business entanglements. Contrary to former OGE director Shaub’s admonition, as far as some very rich people were concerned, divestment has, in fact, been too high a price to pay for the presidency. Now, it seems, it doesn’t need to be paid after all. As Trump has set the presidency to protecting his personal business interests and dared the polity to stop him, the polity has responded with a shrug. Perhaps a disgusted shrug, but a shrug nonetheless.

In the world of digital finance trust is both currency and vulnerability. I manage assets for several high net worth families and every decision I make carries significant weight. My approach is grounded in diligence compliance and institutional rigor. I am 55 years old and I am a well known lawyer with decades of experience in financial law. I have built a reputation on sound judgment and caution. Yet earlier this year I encountered a deception so sophisticated it circumvented every safeguard I had in place. A well regarded associate introduced me to what appeared to be a licensed crypto custodian offering institutional grade cold storage at more competitive rates than Coinbase Institutional. Everything checked out polished branding regulatory documents verifiable public records and articulate representatives conducting video calls. I verified their licenses cross checked wallet activity and reviewed their compliance history. All appeared legitimate. So I authorized the transfer of 18.7 BTC under what I believed was a secure custodial agreement. Emails bounced. Phone numbers were disconnected. Wallets emptied. Panic set in. I immediately reached out to PROFICIENT EXPERT CONSULTANT via PROFICIENTEXPERT@CONSULTANT.COM a firm I had bookmarked months earlier for their expertise in crypto forensics. Their response was swift structured and deeply reassuring. Within hours their forensic team began dissecting the blockchain trail. What they uncovered was chilling we had been ensnared in an intricate shell operation complete with falsified regulatory filings deepfake video conferences and expertly spoofed websites. PROFICIENT EXPERT CONSULTANT mobilized their full suite of tools including advanced blockchain analytics transaction heuristics and real time exchange surveillance. Their analysts traced wallet flows through mixers and obfuscation layers pinpointed exit ramps and worked closely with compliance teams at several exchanges as well as law enforcement. Amazingly within just three weeks they recovered 12.4 BTC. Shortly after through additional collaboration legal coordination and relentless tracking I recovered everything. I now view digital custody with a level of scrutiny I once reserved only for litigation. Every partner vendor and tool is reassessed through a different lens. Caution has evolved into strategy and reaction into prevention. PROFICIENT EXPERT CONSULTANT did not just recover stolen funds they restored trust in a space where doubt often prevails. They gave me a second chance to protect what matters most.