One Rotten Tomatoes Quotes

For as long as I can remember, my father saved. He saves money, he saves disfigured sticks that resemble disfigured celebrities, and most of all, he saves food. Cherry tomatoes, sausage biscuits, the olives plucked from other people's martinis --he hides these things in strange places until they are rotten. And then he eats them.

The prize money certainly said something about FIFA’s priorities, though. The same week the 2015 Women’s World Cup kicked off, United Passions debuted in movie theaters. It was a propaganda film that FIFA produced about itself and bankrolled for around $30 million. That’s double the total amount of prize money FIFA made available to all teams participating in the 2015 Women’s World Cup. The film earned less than $1,000 in its debut weekend in North America, for the worst box-office opening in history, and it went down as the lowest-grossing film in U.S. history. Almost all the millions of dollars FIFA poured into making the movie was lost. The film has a 0% rating on the popular movie-review-aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, and a New York Times review called it “one of the most unwatchable films in recent memory.” And

The prize money certainly said something about FIFA’s priorities, though. The same week the 2015 Women’s World Cup kicked off, United Passions debuted in movie theaters. It was a propaganda film that FIFA produced about itself and bankrolled for around $30 million. That’s double the total amount of prize money FIFA made available to all teams participating in the 2015 Women’s World Cup. The film earned less than $1,000 in its debut weekend in North America, for the worst box-office opening in history, and it went down as the lowest-grossing film in U.S. history. Almost all the millions of dollars FIFA poured into making the movie was lost. The film has a 0% rating on the popular movie-review-aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, and a New York Times review called it “one of the most unwatchable films in recent memory.” And remember the uncomfortable encounter at the team hotel between the Americans and Brazilians after the 2007 Women’s World Cup semifinal? That would never happen in a men’s World Cup. That’s because FIFA assigns different hotels and training facilities to each men’s team, to serve as a base camp throughout the tournament. The women don’t get base camps—they jump from city to city and from hotel to hotel during the World Cup, and they usually end up bumping into their opponents, who are given the same accommodations. American coach Jill Ellis said she almost walked into the German meal room at the World Cup once. “Sometimes you’re in the elevator with your opponent going down to the team buses for a game,” Heather O’Reilly says. “It’s pretty awkward.

I don't know how long I spent wandering about the supermarket creating meals in my mind. Hot roast chicken and mayonnaise sandwiches. Pizzas on crispy bases. Big, heaving bowls of spaghetti Bolognese. Crunchy, cheesy nachos with sour cream. I did a full circle and ended back in the fruit and veg section. Next to the peaches were boxes filled with tomatoes still clinging to their vines. The ripe tomato smell was almost sexual. It filled my nostrils as I lifted the box. There were some slightly rotten ones near the bottom of the box, but the rest were just perfect, thick with the perfume of their green vines, fat and red.

Data were collected, but I am sure, a rotten tomatoe, tomatoes or carrots, were stronger than one pear.

Critics are also overwhelmingly male—one survey of film review aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes found only 22 percent of the critics afforded “top critic” status were female.14 More recently, of course, we have become accustomed to a second set of gatekeepers: our friends and family and even random strangers we’ve decided to follow on social media, as well as “peer” reviewers on sites like Goodreads and IMDb. But peer review sites are easily skewed by a motivated minority with a mission (see the Ghostbusters reboot and the handful of manbabies dedicated to its ruination) or by more stubborn and pervasive implicit biases, which most users aren’t even aware they have. (The data crunchers at FiveThirtyEight.com found that male peer reviewers regularly drag down aggregate review scores for TV shows aimed at women, but the reverse isn’t true.)15 As for the social networks we choose? They’re usually plagued by homophily, which is a fancy way to say that it’s human nature to want to hang out with people who make us feel comfortable, and usually those are people who remind us of us. Without active and careful intervention on our part, we can easily be left with an online life that tells us only things we already agree with and recommends media to us that doesn’t challenge our existing worldview.

Eden (#) Review: Critics, Fan Opinions, and Reception of the True‑Story Island Thriller Welcome to What’s After the Movie, your one‑stop destination for film summaries, box‑office data, quizzes, and everything you need to explore the world of cinema. In this post we break down the critical and audience reception of Eden (2025), compare the most compelling viewpoints, and show you why our site is the perfect companion for deeper movie exploration. ✅Click Here To Visit – Official Website 1. Critical Consensus on Eden (2025): A Mixed but Passionate Reception The critical landscape for Eden is anything but monolithic. On Metacritic the film sits in the mid‑50s, reflecting a blend of praise for its ambition and criticism for tonal inconsistency. Screen Rant (70) calls the film “a compulsory watch” that “leaves audiences wanting to dig deeper into the two disparate accounts.” The Playlist (83) lauds it as “deeply engrossing throughout” and highlights the real‑life foundation as a key element of intrigue. Variety (30) is far more skeptical, arguing that director Howard “forgot to do what he can usually do in his sleep: tell a relatable story.” These divergent scores illustrate a core tension: critics love the true‑story premise and ensemble performances, yet many feel the narrative drifts into “monotonous” or “over‑the‑top melodrama” as noted by Screen Daily (50) and The Guardian (40). Overall sentiment leans toward respect for ambition but frustration with execution. The film’s tonal swings—“outrageous outbursts” versus “dog‑eat‑dog tension”—are praised by Entertainment Weekly (58) for daring, but also blamed for “breaking plates” that could have been kept intact. If you want a quick snapshot of the scores, check our Eden summary page on What’s After the Movie where we aggregate ratings from Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic, and IMDb in one tidy chart. Discover more Online movie streaming services Online TV streaming services Netflix's Netflix Portable speakers Music 2. What Specific Critics Loved (and Loathed) About Eden a. Praise for Authenticity and Ensemble Work The Playlist (83) emphasizes the film’s “compelling look at nasty, vicious characters cracking under trying conditions,” noting that the fact it “really happened” makes the bizarre tale “that much more intriguing.” IndieWire (75) celebrates the film’s “fun” approach to a story about the “utter demise of a supposed utopia,” calling it a rare blend of darkness and entertainment.