Mask Mandate Quotes

COVID-19 … another bioengineered virus we’ve added to our past accomplishments: H5N1, SIV, HIV, Ebola, Marburg, MERS, SARS, Zika—the list is so long. We have so many biolabs situated around the world.” The other man replied, “The original virus’ strain was specifically engineered to target the Asian respiratory system. Releasing the coronavirus in Wuhan, a test city for 5G and a central transit hub, was key to our strategy. Then we tailored different strains that would target other ethnic groups in different countries. Unfortunately, the virus isn’t as effective as it was supposed to be. The Good Club had planned on it culling a much larger percentage of the world’s population. Since there weren’t widespread deaths, we’ve had to resort to inflating the numbers, enforcing practices to help kill more people at hospitals, and a massive disinformation campaign to promote fear. Soon we’ll be releasing another strain and will utilize the CDC and the WHO to make our vaccine cocktail mandatory in as many countries as possible, as well as forcing through mandates, like masks to lower people’s oxygen intake, causing illness and depression, and implementing vaccine passports as the first move toward an all-in-one digital ID is also key.

Come and take it” used to be an edgy patriotic dare referring to the Second Amendment. Now it’s lamely and effeminately tweeted out by those who don’t want government to ever end their futile mask mandates.

Instead of citing scientific studies to justify mandates for masks, lockdowns, and vaccines, our medical rulers cite WHO, CDC, FDA, and NIH—captive agencies that are groveling sock puppets to the industries they regulate.

These studies showed that delaying the mask mandates and bar closures was associated with increased cases. On May 20th, we sent analysis to every governor and the mayor of every major city showing the significant benefit of early action. Too few changed their approaches but facing a rising sea of local doubters even many elected officials who didn't make changes were silently grateful for someone publicly pushing them to do the right things.

In September 2021, in a statement justifying COVID vaccine mandates to school children, Dr. Fauci dreamily recounted his own grade school measles and mumps vaccines—an unlikely memory, since those vaccines weren’t available until 1963 and 1967, and Dr. Fauci attended grade school in the 1940s.19 Dr. Fauci’s little perjuries about masks, measles, mumps, herd immunity, and natural immunity attest to his dismaying willingness to manipulate facts to serve a political agenda.

In the quarter century since the Oslo agreements, the situation in Palestine and Israel has often been falsely described as a clash between two near-equals, between the state of Israel and the quasi-state of the Palestinian Authority. This depiction masks the unequal, unchanged colonial reality. The PA has no sovereignty, no jurisdiction, and no authority except that allowed it by Israel, which even controls a major part of its revenues in the form of customs duties and some taxes. Its primary function, to which much of its budget is devoted, is security, but not for its people: it is mandated by US and Israeli dictates to provide security for Israel’s settlers and occupation forces against the resistance, violent and otherwise, of other Palestinians. Since 1967, there has been one state authority in all of the territory of Mandatory Palestine: that of Israel. The creation of the PA did nothing to change that reality, rearranging the deckchairs on the Palestinian Titanic, while providing Israeli colonization and occupation with an indispensable Palestinian shield.

In city after city, all over the world, the number of people appearing in surgical masks kept multiplying. Those still capable of frivolity added illustrations: luscious lips, stuck-out tongues, piano-keyboard smiles, and--most popular--vampire fangs. In Indianapolis, after hundreds of people fell ill over one weekend, no one was permitted to go out without a mask. But--as happened almost everywhere--there weren't enough masks to go around. Some made do with scarves or other pieces of cloth, or they tried taping gauze or paper to their faces. A lot of people just ignored the rule--and got away with it, the police being out sick in droves.

First they warn everyone to wear a mask. Then we find out unless it's a special kind of mask it's not going to protect you at all." "It's not just a question of beds. There's not enough linen, not enough gloves, gowns, hypodermic needles, disinfectant, meds, you name it. Not enough ambulances, not enough ventilators or other equipment. Hospitals are even running out of food." "It's not like every other bad thing stopped happening to make room for the flu. People are still getting cancer and having heart attacks and strokes and road accidents. The idea that we could handle any kind of surge on top of that--whoever's fantasy that was, it was never going to happen." "The retired workers they were depending on to take over for the workers out sick? Very few of those people ever showed. The volunteer doctors and nurses and the other helping hands--they aren't showing up, either. It's not like 9/11. There aren't any heroes rushing toward the danger. The danger is everywhere, and everyone's running scared." "Let's face it, this is America. Anything that's bad for business, people don't want to hear. When it comes to money or doing the right thing, most people are going to choose money. Close up shop for months till they can make a new vaccine? How many businesses would still be alive after that?" "This disaster proves what some of us have been saying about America all along: everything is broken.

None of them engaged in soul-searching about how to preserve constitutional rights during a global pandemic. Instead, the simulations war-gamed how to use police powers to detain and quarantine citizens, how to impose martial law, how to control messaging by deploying propaganda, how to employ censorship to silence dissent, and how to mandate masks, lockdowns, and coercive vaccinations and conduct track-and-trace surveillance among potentially reluctant populations.

In the quarter century since the Oslo agreements, the situation in Palestine and Israel has often been falsely described as a clash between two near-equals, between the state of Israel and the quasi-state of the Palestinian Authority. This depiction masks the unequal, unchanged colonial reality. The PA has no sovereignty, no jurisdiction, and no authority except that allowed it by Israel, which even controls a major part of its revenues in the form of customs duties and some taxes. Its primary function, to which much of its budget is devoted, is security, but not for its people: it is mandated by US and Israeli dictates to provide security for Israel’s settlers and occupation forces against the resistance, violent and otherwise, of other Palestinians. Since 1967, there has been one state authority in all of the territory of Mandatory Palestine: that of Israel. The creation of the PA did nothing to change that reality, rearranging the deckchairs on the Palestinian Titanic, while providing Israeli colonization and occupation with an indispensable Palestinian shield. Facing the colossus that is the Israeli state is a colonized people denied equal rights and the ability to exercise their right of national self-determination, a continuous condition since the idea of self-determination took hold globally after World War I.

Furthermore, some 52 studies—all available on NIH’s website—find that ordinary masking (using less than an N95 respirator) doesn’t reduce viral infection rates, even—surprisingly—in institutional settings like hospitals and surgical theaters.6,7 Moreover, some 25 additional studies attribute to masking a grim retinue of harms, including respiratory and immune system illnesses, as well as dermatological, dental, gastrointestinal, and psychological injuries.8 Fourteen of these studies are randomized, peer-reviewed placebo studies. There is no well-constructed study that persuasively suggests masks have convincing efficacy against COVID-19 that would justify accepting the harms associated with masks. Finally, retrospective studies on Dr. Fauci’s mask mandates confirm that they were bootless. “Regional analysis in the United States does not show that [mask] mandates had any effect on case rates, despite 93 percent compliance. Moreover, according to CDC data, 85 percent of people who contracted COVID-19 reported wearing a mask,”9 according to Gutentag.

The activism that started with Covid mask mandates, the visuals of angry parents packing school board meetings and holding signs on street corners, revealed something important about power to national politicians.

In sum, the evidence shows that masks did not control rises in infections from COVID-19. Yet anyone questioning the efficacy of broad mask mandates was subjected to vilification and outright censorship.

The trio—none of whom ever treated a COVID patient—adopted controversial strategies to confine the nation under house arrest, shut down the global economy, deny the public access to early treatment and lifesaving therapeutics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, excite persistent public terror through the broadcasts of deliberately exaggerated death and case counts, and repeatedly tell the world that “the only path back to normal is a miraculous vaccine.” With minimal scientific support, they imposed draconian quarantine, mask, and social-distancing mandates, purposefully or accidentally inducing a species of mass psychosis called “Stockholm syndrome” wherein hostages become grateful to their captors convinced that the only path to survival is unquestioning obedience.

One of those 48 studies is the Danish analysis published in November 2020 in the world-renowned journal Annals of Internal Medicine, which concluded: „The trial found no statistically significant benefit of wearing a face mask.“1416 Shortly before, U.S. researcher Yinon Weiss updated his charts on cloth face masks mandates in various countries and U.S. states—and they also showed that mask mandates have made no difference or may even have been counterproductive.1417 The aforementioned website „Ärzte klären auf“ showed a graph with data going until December 4, 2020, which also refutes the effectiveness of the mask obligation.

Instead of citing scientific studies to justify mandates for masks, lockdowns, and vaccines, our medical rulers cite WHO, CDC, FDA, and NIH—captive agencies that are groveling sock puppets to the industries they regulate. Multiple federal and international investigations have documented the financial entanglements with pharmaceutical companies that have made these regulators cesspools of corruption.

Many people, who defend our cherished freedoms as citizens of the US, will argue against mandated masks, helmet laws, gun laws, seatbelts, and against anything else that constricts a person from living life the way they want. Odd that many of these same people will maintain or seek laws to restrict another person's free expression of their gender identity.

The first thing you have to do is define success, but that’s not as easy as you might think. You can’t just look at how often people with COVID in a given country went on to die from it. That statistic will be skewed by the fact that older people are more likely to die from COVID than younger people, so countries with especially old populations will almost inevitably look worse. (One country that did particularly well—even though it has the world’s oldest population—is Japan. It had the best compliance with mask mandates of any country, which helps explain some of its success, but other factors were probably also at play.)

The stories of people who are making sacrifices to help others during this crisis could fill an entire book. Around the world, health care workers put themselves at risk to treat sick people—according to the WHO, more than 115,000 had lost their lives taking care of COVID patients by May 2021. First responders and frontline workers kept showing up and doing their jobs. People checked in on neighbors and bought groceries for them when they couldn’t leave home. Countless people followed the mask mandates and stayed home as much as possible. Scientists worked around the clock, using all their brainpower to stop the virus and save lives. Politicians made decisions based on data and evidence, even though these decisions weren’t always the popular choice. Not everyone did the right thing, of course. Some people have refused to wear masks or get vaccinated. Some politicians have denied the severity of the disease, shut down attempts to limit its spread, and even implied that there’s something sinister in the vaccines. It’s impossible to ignore the impact their choices are having on millions of people, and there’s no better proof of those old political clichés: Elections have consequences, and leadership matters.

As Murray wrote, “This information can provide insights into how combinations of public health mandates—masks, social distancing and school closures, for instance—can keep the virus spread in check. But the government, inexplicably, is not sharing all of its data. Researchers have asked federal officials many times for the missing information but have been told it won’t be shared outside the government.

In the case of facemasks, the latest best evidence now suggests that authorities’ fears were overblown and that their reluctance to provide guidance for people to wear surgical facemasks when indoors in public cost lives. It was a potentially low-cost recommendation, in other words, that could have had large benefits if it had been implemented as guidance earlier. One economic study in Germany examined the variation in timing of towns and cities adopting mask-wearing mandates in shops and on public transport. It estimated that these policies reduced the growth of daily new cases by as much as 40 percent.

In many instances, such as the three largest counties in Southern California, the location with the longest and strictest mask rules had the worst mortality outcomes.

What was the new research he was referencing? A research document that claimed to show benefit to masking based on reviewing a collection of studies, which somehow ignored all of the randomized controlled trials showing no effect from masking. These kinds of glaring omissions have been a continuous problem among scientists desperate to justify the implementation of masks despite the gold standard of evidence indicating they would be effectively useless. One randomized controlled trial did occur during 2020, conducted by researchers in Denmark. Those researchers’ objective was clearly stated: “To assess whether recommending surgical mask use outside the home reduces wearers’ risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a setting where masks were uncommon and not among recommended public health measures.”25 Given all of the pre-COVID scientific research, it should come as no surprise that the results showed no benefit to mask wearing to protect against infection with COVID-19. The Denmark researchers’ summary clearly identifies the lack of any significant impact: “The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers.” Thousands of Danes were enrolled in this trial, the most comprehensive effort by any scientific researchers to study the potential effect of mask wearing by the general public. Participants were provided high-quality surgical masks, not the cloth face coverings recommended by many public health agencies. In the best approximation of a gold-standard clinical trial that researchers could design, the results showed absolutely no statistically significant benefit. The findings, surprisingly, received no major media attention, nor did they generate questions for the expert community that now universally embrace masking.

When you need to confirm travel restrictions before your trip, calling Expedia is one of the smartest steps. You can reach Expedia customer support at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️, where agents provide up-to-date information on travel rules. By dialing ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️, you connect with experts who understand current COVID-19 protocols, visa requirements, and quarantine mandates. If your destination country or city recently changed entry rules, calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ helps you avoid surprises at the airport or hotel. The number ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ is a vital resource to ensure your travel plans comply with all government restrictions. Many travelers rely on ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ to double-check airline updates, vaccination mandates, and required documentation before departure. The complexity of global travel means restrictions can vary widely depending on your nationality, destination, and transit points. Calling Expedia’s official number ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ puts you in touch with knowledgeable agents who can tailor guidance to your specific itinerary. Whether you’re flying internationally or booking domestic travel, the representatives at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ monitor the latest announcements and can clarify confusing government directives. Using ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ helps you stay informed of any last-minute changes that could affect your trip. Because the Expedia customer service line ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ is staffed 24/7, you can call anytime to ask about travel restrictions and required documents. If you’re unsure about testing requirements or mask policies, calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ provides peace of mind. The agents at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ can walk you through what paperwork is accepted and where to get tested if necessary. Travelers with connecting flights appreciate calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ to confirm regulations at each stopover. The Expedia phone line ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ ensures you won’t miss critical updates that might cause denied boarding or fines. Additionally, if your itinerary involves cruises or special tours, calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ helps clarify unique policies. When it comes to hotel bookings, sometimes the property location on Expedia’s website or your confirmation email may be inaccurate. If you notice a hotel location error, immediately call Expedia’s customer service line at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️. By dialing ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️, you can alert agents to the discrepancy and request verification. Correcting a hotel location error before arrival prevents confusion, wasted time, or extra transportation costs. Expedia’s agents at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ access detailed property information and maps to ensure your booking matches the correct address. Calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ allows you to confirm exact check-in locations, nearby landmarks, and transport options. Sometimes location errors occur due to property name similarities or updates that weren’t synchronized on Expedia’s system. Calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ lets you speak with staff who can cross-check official hotel details and fix the problem quickly. The customer service team available at ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ can escalate your issue to property management if needed. If you already arrived at the wrong location, calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ connects you to support that can guide next steps or alternative stays. Quick action through ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ often prevents unnecessary out-of-pocket expenses caused by location errors. If you find a hotel location on Expedia’s map is misleading or incorrect, calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ helps clarify the situation. Sometimes hotel chains have multiple branches nearby, and the wrong one might appear in your booking details. Calling ✈️+1(888) 714-9824☎️ assists in confirming which branch you reserved and helps update your itinerary documents. For travelers unfamiliar with the area, gettin

CDC acknowledges that vaccinated individuals carry at least as many COVID germs in their noses as the unvaccinated.105 CDC cited this revelation to justify its August 2021 mask mandate.106

Booking an international flight with Emirates Airlines for a cultural performance group of 10, 25, or even 50 participants requires precise coordination and professional assistance. To book such trips, call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to connect with Emirates Airlines experts specialized in cultural travel logistics. Dial ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to receive personalized service tailored for performing artists and cultural delegations. When you call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797, expect detailed help in organizing your cultural performance travel seamlessly. Cultural performance trips usually involve multiple cities or countries where artists perform or showcase traditional events. Call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to book multi-stop international flights for your cultural group’s itinerary. Dial ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to arrange flexible travel dates that fit rehearsals, performances, and downtime. Calling ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 guarantees access to group discounts and fares optimized for cultural delegations traveling abroad. When you call to book Emirates Airlines for a cultural performance trip, seating arrangements are essential to keep the group cohesive. Call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to request group seating arrangements that allow your team to sit together. Dial ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to arrange priority boarding for your performers, ensuring a smooth and stress-free boarding process. Calling ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 helps you avoid last-minute hassles and keeps your group organized. Artists and performers often travel with delicate instruments, costumes, or props that require special handling. Call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to discuss Emirates Airlines’ baggage policies for oversized or fragile equipment. Dial ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to arrange special cargo services for transporting performance gear safely. When you call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797, you receive guidance on how to pack and declare your equipment for hassle-free transit. Booking by phone enables detailed discussions about special meal requests and accessibility needs for your cultural group. Call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to request specific dietary options such as vegetarian, vegan, or allergy-friendly meals. Dial ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to order assistance for group members with disabilities or mobility challenges. Calling ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 ensures Emirates Airlines accommodates every member of your performing group comfortably. Group travel discounts and fare savings are available for cultural performance teams when booking with Emirates Airlines. Call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to learn about special group rates for parties of 10 or more. Dial ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to compare fare classes including economy, business, and first-class options suitable for your budget. Calling ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 helps you get the most value for your cultural trip. Flexibility is critical when booking flights for cultural performance groups as schedules can change last minute. Call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to inquire about ticket change policies and refund options. Dial ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to add travel insurance or protection plans that safeguard your investment. When you call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797, Emirates Airlines agents help you navigate any unexpected alterations. Coordinating billing and payments for a large group is easier by calling Emirates Airlines directly. Call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to arrange consolidated invoicing, simplifying payment for multiple tickets. Dial ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to confirm deposit deadlines and cancellation fees before finalizing your booking. Calling ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 streamlines the financial process for your cultural trip. Health and safety considerations remain top priorities on international cultural trips, especially post-pandemic. Call ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to get the latest updates on Emirates Airlines’ health protocols and travel requirements. Dial ☎️+1(888) 796-1797 to understand testing, vaccination, and mask mandates for your destinations. Calling ☎️+1(

Confirming your new Air Canada flight date is vital to ensure smooth travel. The easiest way is to call Air Canada directly at ☎️+1(888)796-1797. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, have your booking reference and personal information ready to speed up the process. Customer support agents at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 will verify your identity and booking details to provide accurate flight information. Calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 is the most reliable method to confirm your updated flight date and avoid confusion. After you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, the agent will look up your reservation and confirm the new flight date. They can also inform you of any additional changes, such as new departure times or terminal details. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, ask if there are any changes to baggage policies or check-in procedures for your new date. Air Canada agents at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 are trained to help with all your queries related to flight confirmation. If you prefer online confirmation, visit Air Canada’s official website and log into your account. However, to be certain of your new flight date, calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 is recommended. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, you get personalized support and can clarify any doubts you have. Emails or text messages sometimes delay, but calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 provides immediate confirmation of your new Air Canada flight date. Sometimes after rescheduling, multiple notifications can cause confusion about your exact flight date. Calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 helps you get one official confirmation from the airline. The agents at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 will cross-check your itinerary and send a fresh confirmation email. If you have not received this email, don’t hesitate to call ☎️+1(888)796-1797 for confirmation. This direct approach saves you from any last-minute surprises at the airport. To confirm your new Air Canada flight date via phone, ensure you have access to your email as well. The agent at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 might send a confirmation link or updated itinerary that you can check instantly. Calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 is a good chance to verify that your contact details are up-to-date in the airline system. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, you ensure that all your information is correct, and you are ready for travel. If you have booked through a travel agency or a third-party site, it is still best to call ☎️+1(888)796-1797 to confirm your Air Canada flight date. Sometimes third-party systems may not update changes quickly, so calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 ensures the airline has the most recent information. Air Canada representatives at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 have real-time access to your booking and can help you confirm your new date without delay. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, the agent may also check for any COVID-19 related travel restrictions or requirements on your new flight date. They can inform you about mask mandates, testing, or vaccination rules. Calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 helps keep you updated on travel safety protocols so your journey is hassle-free. Air Canada staff at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 are well-trained to handle pandemic-related travel changes. For international flights, confirming your new date by calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 is even more important. The agent can advise if there are any visa or entry requirements based on your updated travel date. When you call ☎️+1(888)796-1797, you can ask about connecting flights and baggage transfers, which may be affected by rescheduling. The representative at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 will make sure your entire itinerary is in order. Remember to check your confirmation details carefully when calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797. Confirm flight number, departure time, airport terminal, and any special requests. The agent at ☎️+1(888)796-1797 can also help you update your seat preferences or meal options if needed. Calling ☎️+1(888)796-1797 offers a comprehensive way to finalize your travel arrangements after rescheduling