Lama Animal Quotes

Surely you're not saying that the life of a human and the life of an animal are of the same value?' he ventured. 'As humans we have much greater potential, of course,' His Holiness replied. 'But the way we all want very much to stay alive, the way we cling to our particular experience of consciousness-in this way human and animal are equal.

People think of animals as if they were vegetables, and that is not right. We have to change the way people think about animals. I encourage the Tibetan people and all people to move toward a vegetarian diet that doesn’t cause suffering.

As much as possible, it is useful to think of all other beings as being just like me. Every living being strives for happiness. Every being wants to avoid all forms of suffering. They are not just objects or things to be used for our benefit. You know, Mahatma Gandhi once said: 'The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.

Mahatma Gandhi once said: ‘The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.’ Interesting, isn’t it?

It is clear that something is seriously lacking in the way we humans are going about things. But what is it that we lack? The fundamental problem, I believe, is that at every level we are giving too much attention to the external, material aspects of life while neglecting moral ethics and inner values. By inner values, I mean the qualities that we all appreciate in others, and toward which we all have a natural instinct, bequeathed by our biological nature as animals that survive and thrive only in an environment of concern, affection, and warm-heartedness-or in a single word, compassion. The essence of compassion is a desire to alleviate the suffering of others and to promote their well-being. This is the spiritual principle from which all other positive inner value emerge.

Que história é essa, perguntou o comandante, A história de uma vaca, As vacas têm história, tornou o comandante a perguntar, sorrindo, Esta, sim, foram doze dias e doze noites nums montes da galiza, com frio, e chuva, e gelo, e lama, e pedras como navalhas, e mato como unhas, e breves intervalos de descanço, e mais combates e investidas, e uivos, e mugidos, a história de uma vaca que se perdeu nos campos com a sua cria de leite, e se viu rodeada de lobos durante doze dias e doze noites, e foi obrigada a defender-se e a defender o filho, uma longuíssima batalha, a agonia de viver no limiar da morte, um círculo de dentes, de goelas abertas, de arremetidas bruscas, as cornadas que não podiam falhar, de ter de lutar por si mesma e por uma animalzinho que ainda não se podia valer, e também aqueles momentos em que o vitelo procurava as tetas da mãe, e sugava lentamente, enquanto os lobos se aproximavam, de espinhaço raso e orelhas aguçadas. Subhro respirou fundo e prosseguiu, Ao fim dos doze dias a vaca foi encontrada e salva, mais o vitelo, e foram levados em triunfo para a aldeia, porém, porém o conto não vai acabar aqui, continuou por mais dois dias, ao fim dos quais, porque se tinha tornado brava, porque aprendera a defender-se, porque ninguém podia já dominá-la ou sequer aproximar-se dela, a vaca foi morta, mataram-na, não os lobos que em doze dias vencera, mas os mesmos homens que a haviam salvo, talvez o próprio dono, incapaz de compreender que, tendo aprendido a lutar, aquele antes conformado e pacífico animal não poderia parar nunca mais.

If you accumulate virtuous actions properly— such as avoiding killing, freeing animals, and cultivating patience toward others—it will be beneficial in the future and in the lives to come; whereas if you indulge in negative actions continuously, you definitely will face the consequences in the future. If you do not believe in the principle of karma, then you can do as you like.

The human species is an animal species without very much variation within it, and it is idle and futile to imagine that a voyage to Tibet, say, will discover an entirely different harmony with nature or eternity. The Dalai Lama, for example, is entirely and easily recognizable to a secularist. In exactly the same way as a medieval princeling, he makes the claim not just that Tibet should be independent of Chinese hegemony—a “perfectly good” demand, if I may render it into everyday English—but that he himself is a hereditary king appointed by heaven itself. How convenient! Dissenting sects within his faith are persecuted; his one-man rule in an Indian enclave is absolute; he makes absurd pronouncements about sex and diet and, when on his trips to Hollywood fund-raisers, anoints major donors like Steven Segal and Richard Gere as holy. (Indeed, even Mr. Gere was moved to whine a bit when Mr. Segal was invested as a tulku, or person of high enlightenment. It must be annoying to be outbid at such a spiritual auction.) I will admit that the current “Dalai” or supreme lama is a man of some charm and presence, as I will admit that the present queen of England is a person of more integrity than most of her predecessors, but this does not invalidate the critique of hereditary monarchy, and the first foreign visitors to Tibet were downright appalled at the feudal domination, and hideous punishments, that kept the population in permanent serfdom to a parasitic monastic elite.

We are social animals. We have to live within the society. So it is very necessary to have the right kind of relation with and attitude toward the society.” “Please pay more attention about inner value.
That is the ultimate source of happiness and success for life.” The Dalai Lama “You can’t know wisdom, you have to be it.” Ram Dass “Constructively dealing with adversities and bravely jumping educational hurdles can quickly fine-tune a person to Nature’s Law. We may look to saints and role models for inspiration but we are the ones who make our own effort, and then make our own progress. We may lean on heroes and deities, but the person whose hurdle it is must always do the final and decisive leap over that hurdle.” Tenzin Kharma Trinley

The basic foundation of the practice of morality is to refrain from ten unwholesome actions: three pertaining to the body, four pertaining to speech, and three pertaining to thought. The three physical non-virtues are: (1) killing: intentionally taking the life of a living being, whether a human being, an animal, or even an insect; (2) stealing: taking possession of another’s property without his or her consent, regardless of its value; and (3) sexual misconduct: committing adultery. The four verbal non-virtues are: (4) lying: deceiving others through spoken word or gesture; (5) divisiveness: creating dissension by causing those in agreement to disagree or those in disagreement to disagree further; (6) harsh speech: verbally abusing others; and (7) senseless speech: talking about foolish things motivated by desire and so forth. The three mental non-virtues are: (8) covetousness: desiring to possess something that belongs to someone else; (9) harmful intent: wishing to injure others, whether in a great or small way; and (10) wrong view: holding that such things as rebirth, the law of cause and effect, or the Three Jewels8 do not exist.

Eram într-o frizerie. Tin minte fiecare amanunt...[..] În timp ce frizerul ma tundea, vedeam în oglinda, la garderoba, o femeie cam de patruzeci de ani, cu un aer simplu, modest îmbracata si cu ceva blînd si casnic în atitudini. Una din acele femei care nu trebuie sa fie nici frumoase, nici bine îmbracate, care au un fel de maternitate elementara si o blîndete resemnata si tacuta, traind între gesturi mici. Statea la garderoba, în aceeasi pozitie, fara nici o miscare, fara nici o vorba, privind în gol. De fapt, aveam impresia ca nici macar nu se gîndea.[..] La un moment dat am vazut-o cum se îmbraca, si-a luat o punga de plastic si era gata sa se îndrepte spre usa cînd s-a întîmplat ceva. Probabil, unul dintre frizerii care lucrau de partea cealalta, si mai spre fund, i-a zis ceva ce nu auzisem. Eu o vedeam numai pe ea. A stat cîteva clipe fara sa spuna nimic, privind fix spre partea din fund a frizeriei. Apoi deodata s-a congestionat si a început sa strige. Si pe masura ce striga, vocea ei se subtia, devenea tipat, pîna cînd tipatul s-a sfarîmat. Ea îsi dadea seama ca vocea n-o mai ajuta si tipa atunci si mai tare. Nu întelegeam nimic din ce spunea, dar tipatul acela nesigur, ca o lama de cutit care se frînge, suna atît de strident încît era înfricosator. Nu mai era un tipat omenesc. Era un tipat animalic plin de disperare si de neputinta. Nu stiu cît a durat astfel, dar parca nu se mai termina si simteam ca nu mai puteam sa suport. Si poate si mai mult m-a înfricosat faptul ca în acest timp nimeni din frizerie n-a întors privirea spre locul acela. Ca si cum tot ce vedeam si auzeam erau nascociri ale imaginatiei mele. Pentru ceilalti, femeia aceea tacea în continuare la garderoba ei sau plecase. Întelegeti? Tipatul ei nu exista. În zadar tipa, nimeni nu vroia s-o auda. Inclusiv eu, de fapt. Caci în tot acest timp nu m-am sculat de pe scaun sa ma întorc. L-am lasat pe frizer sa ma tunda mai departe. Si numai dupa ce femeia s-a dus undeva în spatele frizeriei, unde îsi lasau frizerii halatele, caci i se facuse rau, l-am întrebat pe cel care ma tundea: "Ce s-a întîmplat?" Ca si cum eu nu fusesem de fata sau ma gîndisem la altceva, nu fusesem atent. Frizerul mi-a explicat atunci ca femeia lucra acolo de mai multa vreme si fusese concediata, iar ea, neavînd din ce trai, venea totusi si-si facea treaba mai departe fara nici un salariu, multumindu-se cu ceea ce primea bacsis. Unul dintre frizeri îi aruncase o vorba grosolana, adaugînd ca nu era nevoie de ea acolo, de ce venea...Îi auzeam înca gemetele cînd am platit si am plecat cît am putut mai repede. Simteam ca trebuia sa ajung afara. Sa n-o mai aud pe femeia aceea gemînd. Si parca tipatul ei plutea în continuare ca un tais de pumnal în aerul frizeriei, desi ceea ce se petrecuse nu zdruncinase nici un detaliu. Rumoarea era aceeasi ca deobicei. "Criza de isterie, a zis unul. Am mai vazut noi de-astea."Atît. Întelegeti? Acesta a fost singurul comentariu pe care l-am auzit... [..]Tipatul dizgratios si disperat, aproape animalic, al acelei femei sfîsiase brutal tot ce tesusem eu cu grija ani de zile. Fericire? Lumina? Frumusete? Gogosi! Cacialma, domnilor. Nu exista decît tipatul si tacerea. Gemetele de animal înjunghiat si exclamatia: "Am mai vazut noi de-astea". Atunci am priceput prima oara ca traisem într-o minciuna aurita. [..] Mi-am dat seama ca tipetele exista, însa nu le auzim.Nu vrem sa le auzim. Sîntem surzi, iar cei care tipa se chinuiesc sa tipe si mai tare vazînd ca nimeni nu-i aude. Toti îsi vad de treburile lor mai departe, ca si cînd nimic nu s-ar fi întîmplat, iar tu te simti atunci ca o papusa dezarticulata.

Una dieta vegetariana pobre en proteínas constituye una manera sana de vivir. Incluso si no podéis ser estrictamente vegetarianos, será beneficioso moderar la cantidad de carne que coméis. En las escuelas meridionales del budismo, el hecho de comer carne no está estrictamente prohibido, pero la carne de algunos animales, como los que no tienen la pezuña hendida o no han sido especialmente sacrificados para vuestro consumo personal, está prohibida. Lo que quiere decir que la carne vendida habitualmente en los mercados es aceptable. A la carne que puede ser comida se le llama «carne pura» y se distingue por tres condiciones: que no hayáis visto sacrificar al animal para que os lo comáis, que no tengáis ninguna información al respecto y que no tengáis ninguna duda sobre el hecho de que el animal no haya sido sacrificado especialmente para vuestro consumo personal. En general, las escuelas budistas del Mahayana no prohíben tampoco el consumo de carne. Sin embargo, algunas escrituras, como el Sutra del descenso a Lanka10 prohíben estricta y permanentemente el consumo de carne, mientras que otras, como la Esencia del Madhyamika11 de Acharya Bhavaviveka, parecen autorizarlo. De modo que algunos de los textos Mahayana relativos a la perfección de la sabiduría12 prohíben el consumo de carne, mientras que otros no. Las tres clases inferiores de tantra prohíben estrictamente comer carne, mientras que las clases superiores autorizan el consumo. Algunas prácticas rituales propias de esta clase de tantra requieren los cinco tipos de carne y los cinco tipos de néctar. Por lo tanto, y según la regla más general, se puede comer la carne que se encuentra en el mercado, pero debemos abstenernos de matar o permitir que se maten animales para nuestro consumo personal.

Primatologist Frans de Waal believes that such peace-making activities are extremely common in the animal kingdom. Chimps kiss and make up, and it seems that many other species do as well. Not only apes like us but also sheep, goats, hyenas, and dolphins. Of the species that have been studied, only domestic cats have failed to show behavior that reconciles relationships after conflict. (This finding will not surprise anyone who has cats.)

Killing animals for sport, for pleasure, for adventures, and for hides and furs is a phenomenon which is at once disgusting and distressing. There is no justification in indulging in such acts of brutality.

As humans we have much greater potential, of course,” His Holiness replied. “But the way we all want very much to stay alive, the way we cling to our particular experience of consciousness—in this way human and animal are equal.

I think I have to take issue with you on that,” the Archbishop responded. “The people who go around becoming bullies are people who have a massive sense of insecurity, who want to prove that they are somebody, often because they did not get enough love.” “I think, yes, circumstances, environment, education all matter,” the Dalai Lama replied. “Especially today; there is not much focus on inner values in education. Then, instead of inner values, we become self-centered—always thinking: I, I, I. A self-centered attitude brings a sense of insecurity and fear. Distrust. Too much fear brings frustration. Too much frustration brings anger. So that’s the psychology, the system of mind, of emotion, which creates a chain reaction. With a self-centered attitude, you become distanced from others, then distrust, then feel insecure, then fear, then anxiety, then frustration, then anger, then violence.” It was fascinating to hear the Dalai Lama describe the process of mind that leads to fear, alienation, and ultimately to violence. I pointed out that so often our parenting in the West is too focused on our children, and their needs alone, rather than helping them to learn to care for others. The Dalai Lama responded, “Yes, there is too much self-centeredness also among parents—‘my children, my children.’ That’s biased love. We need unbiased love toward entire humanity, entire sentient beings, irrespective of what their attitude is toward us. So your enemies are still human brothers and sisters, so they also deserve our love, our respect, our affection. That’s unbiased love. You might have to resist your enemies’ actions, but you can love them as brothers and sisters. Only we human beings can do this with our human intelligence. Other animals cannot do this.

This means that when the guru appears, he purposely shows us this mistaken, ordinary aspect in order to guide us and all other transmigratory beings to enlightenment. The conclusion is that without the guru guiding us in this ordinary aspect, we would be without a guide, totally lost in samsara. We would be like a baby left out in a hot desert with no food or water, surrounded by dangerous animals.

The creatures that inhabit this earth – be they human beings or animals – are here to contribute, each in its own particular way, to the beauty and prosperity of the world.

I generally prefer the word “compassion” to care or empathy. For me, compassion is a developed moral capability, whereas care or empathy are closer to the natural capacities that make compassion possible. Humans, and many other animals, naturally have empathy for the suffering of others. Compassion, on the other hand, is a cultivated aspiration to benefit other beings. “I use the word “compassion” in the way that the Dalai Lama articulates it in his recent book, Beyond Religion: “… although compassion arises from empathy, the two are not the same. Empathy is characterized by a kind of emotional resonance—feeling with the other person. Compassion, in contrast, is not just sharing experience with others, but also wishing to see them relieved of their suffering. Being compassionate does not mean remaining entirely at the level of feeling, which could be quite draining. After all, compassionate doctors would not be very effective if they were always preoccupied with sharing their patients’ pain. Compassion means wanting to do something to relieve the hardships of others, and this desire to help, far from dragging us further into suffering ourselves, actually gives us energy and a sense of purpose and direction. When we act upon this motivation, both we and those around us benefit still more. (2011, 55)” (Compassion and being human: Deane Curtin)

It calls for compassion, most of all for the direct victims of our dominant food practices, but also those who are exploited by the contemporary industrial food system. It should also evoke some compassion for ourselves as we work through this complex set of demands to achieve a life whose flourishing does not diminish the flourishing of others. And, if the Dalai Lama’s challenging ideas about universal compassion make sense, we need to practice compassion even for those who support the industrial food system, not in spite of the slaughter of billions of innocent beings, but because of it. As the philosopher Baruch Spinoza observed, “Hatred is increased by reciprocal hatred, and may on the other hand be destroyed by love” (Spinoza and Morgan 2006, 83).” (Compassion and being human: Deane Curtin p. 1310

It calls for compassion, most of all for the direct victims of our dominant food practices, but also those who are exploited by the contemporary industrial food system. It should also evoke some compassion for ourselves as we work through this complex set of demands to achieve a life whose flourishing does not diminish the flourishing of others. And, if the Dalai Lama’s challenging ideas about universal compassion make sense, we need to practice compassion even for those who support the industrial food system, not in spite of the slaughter of billions of innocent beings, but because of it. As the philosopher Baruch Spinoza observed, “Hatred is increased by reciprocal hatred, and may on the other hand be destroyed by love” (Spinoza and Morgan 2006, 83). (Compassion and being human: Deane Curtin)

In fields of flowers gently swaying, Young bees sing their happy songs And pheasants strut a dance of joy. The cuckoo too Rings the bell of melody And the kalapingka bird chirps merrily along. Here the earth maiden is beautiful indeed: Her Virgin streams holding up garlands of bubbles As they laughingly dance over rocks and crags; Her orchards filled with all types of trees Laden with fruit, flowers, and leaves; And, standing behind, rings of snow mountains, Their peaks bloused in white silken clouds, Crystal glaciers their tassels And blue forests their exquisite skirt. Lapis lazuli meadows stretch below Like the wings of a parrot in flight, Nets of Lotus flowers embellishing then And wild animals grazing quietly on their slopes A fence of trees stands again behind To lock out the Thief of every distraction.

[...] na corrente do meu transe já não contava a sua dor misturada ao respeito pela letra dos antigos, eu tinha de gritar em furor que a minha loucura era mais sábia que a sabedoria do pai, que a minha enfermidade me era mais conforme que a saúde da família, que os meus remédios não foram jamais inscritos nos compêndios, mas que existia uma outra medicina (a minha!), e que fora de mim eu não reconhecia qualquer ciência, e que era tudo só uma questão de perspectiva, e o que valia era o meu e só o meu ponto de vista, e que era um requinte de saciados testar a virtude da paciência com a fome de terceiros, e dizer tudo isso num acesso verbal, espasmódico, obsessivo, virando a mesa dos sermões num revertério, destruindo travas, ferrolhos e amarras, tirando não obstante o nível atento ao prumo, erguendo um outro equilíbrio, e pondo força, subindo sempre em altura, retesando sobretudo meus músculos clandestinos, redescobrindo sem demora em mim todo o animal, cascos, mandíbulas e esporas, deixando que um sebo oleoso cobrisse minha escultura enquanto eu cavalgasse fazendo minhas crinas voarem como se fossem plumas, amassando com minhas patas sagitárias o ventre mole deste mundo, consumindo neste pasto um grão de trigo e uma gorda fatia de cólera embebida em vinho, eu, o epilético, o possuído, o tomado, eu, o faminto, arrolando na minha fala convulsa a alma de uma chama, um pano de verônica e o espirro de tanta lama, misturando no caldo deste fluxo o nome salgado da irmã, o nome pervertido de Ana, retirando da fímbria das palavras ternas o sumo do meu punhal, me exaltando de carne estremecida na volúpia urgente de uma confissão (que tremores, quantos sóis, que estertores!) até que meu corpo lasso num momento tombasse docemente de exaustão.

How do we create more friends?” he now asked rhetorically. “Trust. How do you develop trust? It’s simple: You show your genuine sense of concern for their well-being. Then trust will come. But if behind an artificial smile, or a big banquet, is a self-centered attitude deep inside of you, then there will never be trust. If you are thinking how to exploit, how to take advantage of them, then you can never develop trust in others. Without trust, there is no friendship. We human beings are social animals, as we’ve said, and we need friends. Genuine friends. Friends for money, friends for power are artificial friends.

There is no realm in samsara where we have not taken birth, no samsaric pleasure we have not enjoyed, and no form of life we have not known over our countless stream of previous lives. Yet even now as humans most of us are like blind animals, unable to discern the patterns of life unfolding within us, leaving spiritual aims behind and chasing only the biological and emotional needs of the senses. Totally unaware of the spiritual methods that produce everlasting joy, we admire the ignoble and have distaste for the noble.

Philosophically speaking, from the Buddhist point of view, both human beings and animals possess what in Tibetan is called shepa, which can be roughly translated as “consciousness,” albeit to different degrees of complexity.

In fact, as human beings, we are by nature social animals, and our happiness and even survival depend upon our interaction and cooperation. So when positive emotions guide intelligence, it become constructive. The warm, compassionate heart is the basis for peace of mind, without which the mind will always be uncomfortable and disturbed.

IN OUR WORLD, we need a clear awareness of the interdependent nature of nations, of humans and animals, and of humans, animals and the world. Everthing is of interdependent nature. I feel that many problems, especially man-made problems, are due to a lack of knowledge about this interdependent nature.

Joy,” as the Archbishop said during the week, “is much bigger than happiness. While happiness is often seen as being dependent on external circumstances, joy is not.” This state of mind—and heart—is much closer to both the Dalai Lama’s and the Archbishop’s understanding of what animates our lives and what ultimately leads to a life of satisfaction and meaning.

The reality, as the Archbishop mentioned, is that human beings are social animals. One individual, no matter how powerful, how clever, cannot survive without other human beings. So the best way to fulfill your wishes, to reach your goals, is to help others, to make more friends. “How do we create more friends?” he now asked rhetorically. “Trust. How do you develop trust? It’s simple: You show your genuine sense of concern for their well-being. Then trust will come. But if behind an artificial smile, or a big banquet, is a self-centered attitude deep inside of you, then there will never be trust.

The only thing that will bring happiness is affection and warmheartedness. This really brings inner strength and self-confidence, reduces fear, develops trust, and trust brings friendship. We are social animals, and cooperation is necessary for our survival, but cooperation is entirely based on trust. When there is trust, people are brought together—whole nations are brought together.

Mahatma Gandhi once said: ‘The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.