Interface Designers Quotes

Readers usually ignore the typographic interface, gliding comfortably along literacy’s habitual groove. Sometimes, however, the interface should be allowed to fail. By making itself evident, typography can illuminate the construction and identity of a page, screen, place, or product.

Jobs's intensity was also evident in his ability to focus. He would set priorities, aim his laser attention on them, and filter out distractions. If something engaged him- the user interface for the original Macintosh, the design of the iPod and iPhone, getting music companies into the iTunes Store-he was relentless. But if he did not want to deal with something - a legal annoyance, a business issue, his cancer diagnosis, a family tug- he would resolutely ignore it. That focus allowed him to say no. He got Apple back on track by cutting all except a few core products. He made devices simpler by eliminating buttons, software simpler by eliminating features, and interfaces simpler by eliminating options. He attributed his ability to focus and his love of simplicity to his Zen training. It honed his appreciation for intuition, showed him how to filter out anything that was distracting or unnecessary, and nurtured in him an aesthetic based on minimalism.

Why can't you summon a command line and search your real-world home for 'Honda car keys,' and specify rooms in your house to search instead of folders or paths in your computer's home directory? It's a crippling design flaw in the real-world interface.

After all, as Edward Tufte once said, “Overload, clutter, and confusion are not attributes of information, they are failures of design.

User interface is the process of shifting from chaotic complexity to elegant simplicity.

An ugly system is one in which there are special interfaces for everything you want to do. Unix is the opposite. It gives you the building blocks that are sufficient for doing everything. That's what having a clean design is all about.

Effective gamification is a combination of game design, game dynamics, behavioral economics, motivational psychology, UX/UI (User Experience and User Interface), neurobiology, technology platforms, as well as ROI-driving business implementations.

Intuitive design happens when current knowledge is the same as the target knowledge.

Like putting an Armani suit on Attila the Hun, interface design only tells how to dress up an existing behavior.

As Susan Kare, designer of the original Mac interface, said, “You can’t really decide to paint a masterpiece. You just have to think hard, work hard, and try to make a painting that you care about. Then, if you’re lucky, your work will find an audience for whom it’s meaningful.

Methods containing hundreds of lines of code are fine if they have a simple signature and are easy to read. These methods are deep (lots of functionality, simple interface), which is good.

The software engineers who labored over the interface would have probably resorted to the standard lament: “RTFM”—“Read the (ahem) Manual.” For design thinkers, however, behaviors are never right or wrong, but they are always meaningful.

The best way to learn the value of good interface design is to use lots of interfaces — some good, some bad. Experience will teach you what works and what doesn’t. Never assume that a painful interface is “just the way it is.” Fix it, or wrap it in

when designers use clean aesthetics to cover over a complex reality—to take something human, nuanced, and rife with potential for bias, and flatten it behind a seamless interface—they’re not really making it easier for you. They’re just hiding the flaws in their model, and hoping you won’t ask too many difficult questions.

A bad UI is like an elephant in a room of blind people.

Particularly in the past fifty years the world has gradually been finding out something that architects have always known—that is—that everything is architecture. Charles Eames

casting the interface reference to any implementation is always a bad idea.

Design is like a magic trick, it's all about creating the illusion of simplicity.

Remember, these things are designed for amateurs.” “Tell me about it,” Ivy snorted. “The user interface is so easy to use, I can’t do anything.

To deliver both power and pleasure to users, interaction designers think first conceptually, then in terms of behavior, and last in terms of interface.

Mother-infant inter-brain synchrony provides a template for designing compassionate artificial intelligence and social robots.

The design of good interfaces takes time and ingenuity.

The approach to digital culture I abhor would indeed turn all the world's books into one book, just as Kevin (Kelly) suggested. It might start to happen in the next decade or so. Google and other companies are scanning library books into the cloud in a massive Manhattan Project of cultural digitization. What happens next is what's important. If the books in the cloud are accessed via user interfaces that encourage mashups of fragments that obscure the context and authorship of each fragment, there will be only one book. This is what happens today with a lot of content; often you don't know where a quoted fragment from a news story came from, who wrote a comment, or who shot a video. A continuation of the present trend will make us like various medieval religious empires, or like North Korea, a society with a single book. The Bible can serve as a prototypical example. Like Wikipedia, the Bible's authorship was shared, largely anonymous, and cumulative, and the obscurity of the individual authors served to create an oracle-like ambience for the document as "the literal word of God." If we take a non-metaphysical view of the Bible, it serves as a link to our ancestors, a window. The ethereal, digital replacement technology for the printing press happens to have come of age in a time when the unfortunate ideology I'm criticizing dominates technological culture. Authorship - the very idea of the individual point of view - is not a priority of the new ideology. The digital flattening of expression into a global mush is not presently enforced from the top down, as it is in the case of a North Korean printing press. Instead, the design of software builds the ideology into those actions that are the easiest to perform on the software designs that are becoming ubiquitous. It is true that by using these tools, individuals can author books or blogs or whatever, but people are encouraged by the economics of free content, crowd dynamics, and lord aggregators to serve up fragments instead of considered whole expressions or arguments. The efforts of authors are appreciated in a manner that erases the boundaries between them. The one collective book will absolutely not be the same thing as the library of books by individuals it is bankrupting. Some believe it will be better; others, including me, believe it will be disastrously worse. As the famous line goes from Inherit the Wind: 'The Bible is a book... but it is not the only book' Any singular, exclusive book, even the collective one accumulating in the cloud, will become a cruel book if it is the only one available.

If your product solves real problems, has a simple, intuitive interaction and an appealing, easy-to-read visual design, yet people aren’t using it, chances are your product is failing to communicate at a human level.

Usability, fundamentally, is a matter of bringing a bit of human rights into the world of computer-human interaction. It's a way to let our ideals shine through in our software, no matter how mundane the software is. You may think that you're stuck in a boring, drab IT department making mind-numbing inventory software that only five lonely people will ever use. But you have daily opportunities to show respect for humanity even with the most mundane software.

The paradox of impact is that while design shapes the world in profound ways, it is also being shaped by the world. Design as a process necessarily interfaces with many other systems to shape and redefine the world and our human experience within it. Designers and design in general is, however, uniquely situated to be critical mediators between the various entities, forces, and agendas that are constantly at work in developing the future that we collectively and individually want.

We must create more effective interfaces with innovations across the whole of society; rethink how policies are designed; change how intellectual property regimes are governed; and use R& D to distribute intelligence across academia, government, business and civil society. This means restoring public purpose in policies so that they are aimed at creating tangible benefits for citizens and setting goals that matter to people–driven by public-interest considerations rather than profit.

One cannot not communicate. Because every behavior is a kind of communication, people who are aware of each other are constantly communicating. Any perceivable behavior, including the absence of action, has the potential to be interpreted by other people as having some meaning.

I would argue that play is an essential part of living. It’s the process by which great discoveries are made, industries are built, and people fall in love. The instinctive human drive toward play continuously pushes us to find new ways to understand and influence the world around us.

Over the past four decades, much evidence has accumulated suggesting that responsiveness — a software application’s ability to keep up with users and not make them wait — is the most important factor in determining user satisfaction. Not just one of the most important factors - the most important factor.

When you're designing for extremes with software, the three most important "extremes" to remember are: 1. Design for people who can't read. 2. Design for people who can't use a mouse. 3. Design for people who have such bad memories they would forget their own name if it weren't embossed on their American Express

As designers, we have a responsibility to remove inherent complexity from our interfaces, or else we ship that complexity to our users. This can result in confusion, frustration and a bad user experience. Where possible, designers and developers should handle complexity, while taking care not to over-simplify to the point of abstraction.

Noneditable data should never be displayed in a control that looks editable or operable. Checkboxes, radio buttons, menus, sliders, and the like should never be used for noneditable data because they look operable. Even if they are inactive (grayed), they look like they can somehow be made active, and users will waste time trying to do so.

Disney and Apple/Microsoft are in the same business: short-circuiting laborious, explicit verbal communication with expensively designed interfaces. Disney is a sort of user interface unto itself—and more than just graphical. Let’s call it a Sensorial Interface. It can be applied to anything in the world, real or imagined, albeit at staggering expense.

Pham Nuwen spent years learning to program/explore. Programming went back to the beginning of time. It was a little like the midden out back of his father’s castle. Where the creek had worn that away, ten meters down, there were the crumpled hulks of machines—flying machines, the peasants said—from the great days of Canberra’s original colonial era. But the castle midden was clean and fresh compared to what lay within the Reprise’s local net. There were programs here that had been written five thousand years ago, before Humankind ever left Earth. The wonder of it—the horror of it, Sura said—was that unlike the useless wrecks of Canberra’s past, these programs still worked! And via a million million circuitous threads of inheritance, many of the oldest programs still ran in the bowels of the Qeng Ho system. Take the Traders’ method of timekeeping. The frame corrections were incredibly complex—and down at the very bottom of it was a little program that ran a counter. Second by second, the Qeng Ho counted from the instant that a human had first set foot on Old Earth’s moon. But if you looked at it still more closely. . .the starting instant was actually some hundred million seconds later, the 0-second of one of Humankind’s first computer operating systems. So behind all the top-level interfaces was layer under layer of support. Some of that software had been designed for wildly different situations. Every so often, the inconsistencies caused fatal accidents. Despite the romance of spaceflight, the most common accidents were simply caused by ancient, misused programs finally getting their revenge. “We should rewrite it all,” said Pham. “It’s been done,” said Sura, not looking up. She was preparing to go off-Watch, and had spent the last four days trying to root a problem out of the coldsleep automation. “It’s been tried,” corrected Bret, just back from the freezers. “But even the top levels of fleet system code are enormous. You and a thousand of your friends would have to work for a century or so to reproduce it.” Trinli grinned evilly. “And guess what—even if you did, by the time you finished, you’d have your own set of inconsistencies. And you still wouldn’t be consistent with all the applications that might be needed now and then.” Sura gave up on her debugging for the moment. “The word for all this is ‘mature programming environment.’ Basically, when hardware performance has been pushed to its final limit, and programmers have had several centuries to code, you reach a point where there is far more signicant code than can be rationalized. The best you can do is understand the overall layering, and know how to search for the oddball tool that may come in handy—take the situation I have here.” She waved at the dependency chart she had been working on. “We are low on working fluid for the coffins. Like a million other things, there was none for sale on dear old Canberra. Well, the obvious thing is to move the coffins near the aft hull, and cool by direct radiation. We don’t have the proper equipment to support this—so lately, I’ve been doing my share of archeology. It seems that five hundred years ago, a similar thing happened after an in-system war at Torma. They hacked together a temperature maintenance package that is precisely what we need.” “Almost precisely.

If you need to visualize the soul, think of it as a cross between a wolf howl, a photon, and a dribble of dark molasses. But what it really is, as near as I can tell, is a packet of information. It’s a program, a piece of hyperspatial software designed explicitly to interface with the Mystery. Not a mystery, mind you, the Mystery. The one that can never be solved. To one degree or another, everybody is connected to the Mystery, and everybody secretly yearns to expand the connection. That requires expanding the soul. These things can enlarge the soul: laughter, danger, imagination, meditation, wild nature, passion, compassion, psychedelics, beauty, iconoclasm, and driving around in the rain with the top down. These things can diminish it: fear, bitterness, blandness, trendiness, egotism, violence, corruption, ignorance, grasping, shining, and eating ketchup on cottage cheese. Data in our psychic program is often nonlinear, nonhierarchical, archaic, alive, and teeming with paradox. Simply booting up is a challenge, if not for no other reason than that most of us find acknowledging the unknowable and monitoring its intrusions upon the familiar and mundane more than a little embarrassing. But say you’ve inflated your soul to the size of a beach ball and it’s soaking into the Mystery like wine into a mattress. What have you accomplished? Well, long term, you may have prepared yourself for a successful metamorphosis, an almost inconceivable transformation to be precipitated by your death or by some great worldwide eschatological whoopjamboreehoo. You may have. No one can say for sure. More immediately, by waxing soulful you will have granted yourself the possibility of ecstatic participation in what the ancients considered a divinely animated universe. And on a day to day basis, folks, it doesn’t get any better than that.

Most modules have more users than developers, so it is better for the developers to suffer than the users. As a module developer, you should strive to make life as easy as possible for the users of your module, even if that means extra work for you. Another way of expressing this idea is that it is more important for a module to have a simple interface than a simple implementation.

Gates was good at computer coding, unlike Jobs, and his mind was more practical, disciplined, and abundant in analytic processing power. Jobs was more intuitive and romantic and had a greater instinct for making technology usable, design delightful, and interfaces friendly. He had a passion for perfection, which made him fiercely demanding, and he managed by charisma and scattershot intensity.

A good designer should constantly be looking for opportunities to learn from others’ mistakes. Instead of blaming the protagonists, we should try to put ourselves in their shoes and honestly answer these questions: What would lead me to design the same interface they did? What decisions led to this product being approved and shipped? How can I avoid finding myself in a similar position in the future?

I had argued that it was ridiculous for a person to have two separate interfaces, one for local information (the desktop of their own computer) and one for remote information (a browser to reach other computers). Why did we need an entire desktop for our own computer but get only a window through which to view the entire rest of the planet? Why, for that matter, should we have folders on our desktop but not on the web?

A similar argument can be made about the form that the interface takes—with little pictures of folders and pages and trash cans. Those analogies are based in physical forms and so we associate the simplicity of the physical folder with that of the digital one. At best, we have faith in the interface that it is an accurate simplification of a more complex system behind it, and at worse, we don’t even recognize the complexity at all.

Something refused to come into focus in my thinking. Indistinctly, as though in a fog, shapes moved toward me and retreated just beyond cognition. But that getting a hold of things is the uncertainty. As the Tractatus says right at the beginning, “The world is everything that is the case.” It seemed as though the Mammy≈Divas® were just like Steve Jobs, trying to have reality bent to their own wills. Objectively, the iPhone was a muddle of mysticism and logic—breakable glass, non-ergonomic design, lousy battery life, lousy irreplaceable battery, lousy headphone jack, lousy virtual keyboard, lousy email, lousy memory, lousy lice, etc., etc, and an interface that you had to adapt to by pretending as an article of faith that no adaptation was required. The Mammy≈Divas® promised a seamless racial interface—eternal blackness ordered and majestic. They put a benign face on their lust for panoptic power. They promised to discipline and punish with pancakes.

thousand flowers bloom. Sometimes it’s nice to be in the hands of a control freak. • • • Jobs’s intensity was also evident in his ability to focus. He would set priorities, aim his laser attention on them, and filter out distractions. If something engaged him—the user interface for the original Macintosh, the design of the iPod and iPhone, getting music companies into the iTunes Store—he was relentless. But if he did not want to deal with something—a legal annoyance, a business issue,

Software developers come mainly from engineering and don’t see how similar their industry has become to the one that produces magazines, newspapers, books, TV shows, and movies. Most software developers haven’t yet learned to develop and follow strict standards for layout and graphic design and to pay as much attention to detail as traditional publishers and media studios do. As a result, graphic design and layout bloopers often get a “Who cares? It looks OK to me!” reaction from developers.

In any case, even if a usability test resolves a dispute, it doesn't do it in any kind of a statistically valid way. Unless you test thousands of people from all walks of life under all kinds of conditions, something that not even Microsoft can afford to do, you are not actually getting statistically meaningful results. Remember, the real strength of usability tests is in finding truffles—finding the broken bits so you can fix them. Actually looking at the results as if they were statistics is just not justified.

Project managers don’t write code, they don’t test the use cases, and they’re not designing the interface. You know what a good project manager does? They are chaos-destroying machines, and each new person you bring onto your team, each dependency you create, adds hard-to-measure entropy to your team. A good project manager thrives on measuring, controlling, and crushing entropy. You did this easily when you were a team of five, but if you’re going to succeed at 105, what was done organically now needs to be done mechanically.

I write them to improve my productivity as a programmer. Making the quality assurance department happy is just a side effect. Unit tests are highly localized. Each test class works within a single package. It tests the interfaces to other packages, but beyond that it assumes the rest just works. Functional tests are a different animal. They are written to ensure the software as a whole works. They provide quality assurance to the customer and don't care about programmer productivity. They should be developed by a different team, one who delights in finding bugs.

In his book Software Abstractions, MIT Professor Daniel Jackson explains just how important it is to choose the right abstractions. "Pick the right ones, and programming will flow naturally from design; modules will have small and simple interfaces; and new functionality will more likely fit in without extensive reorganization, " Jackson writes. "Pick the wrong ones, and programming will be a series of nasty surprises: interfaces will become baroque and clumsy as they are forced to accommodate unanticipated interactions, and even the simplest of changes will be hard to make.

0.1 second: This is the limit for perception of cause-and-effect between events. If software waits longer than 0.1 second to show a response to your action, cause-and-effect is broken: the software’s reaction will not seem to be a result of your action. Therefore, on-screen buttons have 0.1 second to show they’ve been clicked; otherwise users will click again. If an object the user is “dragging” lags more than 0.1 second behind the cursor, users will have trouble placing it. This 0.1-second deadline is what HCI researcher Stuart Card calls the perceptual “moment.” It is also close to the limit for perception of smooth animation: 0.063 second/frame (16 frames/second)

Jobs’s intensity was also evident in his ability to focus. He would set priorities, aim his laser attention on them, and filter out distractions. If something engaged him—the user interface for the original Macintosh, the design of the iPod and iPhone, getting music companies into the iTunes Store—he was relentless. But if he did not want to deal with something—a legal annoyance, a business issue, his cancer diagnosis, a family tug—he would resolutely ignore it. That focus allowed him to say no. He got Apple back on track by cutting all except a few core products. He made devices simpler by eliminating buttons, software simpler by eliminating features, and interfaces simpler by eliminating options.

...задача дизайнеров заключается в том, чтобы создавать интерфейсы, которые не позволяют привычкам вызывать проблемы у пользователей. Мы должны создавать интерфейсы, которые, во-первых, целенаправленно опираются на человеческую способность формировать привычки и, во-вторых, развивают у пользователей такие привычки, которые позволяют упростить ход работы. В случае идеального человекоориентированного интерфейса доля участия самого интерфейса в работе пользователя должна сводиться к формированию полезных привычек. Многие проблемы, которые делают программные продукты сложными и неудобными в использовании, происходят из-за того, что в используемом интерфейсе «человек-машина» не учитываются полезные и вредные свойства человеческой способности формировать привычки.

Sometimes I lie awake at night, or I wander in the field behind my house, or I walk down the street in our local town and think I can see it all around me: the Grid. The veins and sinews of the Machine that surrounds us and pins us and provides for us and defines us now. I imagine a kind of network of shining lines in the air, glowing like a dewed spiderweb in the morning sun. I imagine the cables and the satellite links, the films and the words and the records and the opinions, the nodes and the data centres that track and record the details of my life. I imagine the mesh created by the bank transactions and the shopping trips, the passport applications and the text messages sent. I see this thing, whatever it is, being constructed, or constructing itself around me, I see it rising and tightening its grip, and I see that none of us can stop it from evolving into whatever it is becoming. I see the Machine, humming gently to itself as it binds us with its offerings, as it dangles its promises before us and slowly, slowly, slowly reels us in. I think of the part of it we interact with daily, the glowing white interface through which we volunteer every detail of our lives in exchange for information or pleasure or stories told by global entertainment corporations who commodify our culture and sell it back to us. I think of the words we use to describe this interface, which we carry with us in our pockets wherever we go, as we are tracked down every street and into every forest that remains: the web; the net. I think: These are things designed to trap prey.

What are common Robinhood issues? Robinhood’s Risky User Interface Common Robinhood issues include frequent outages during high trding volumes 【+1-415-630-8272】, causing usres to miss crucial trades. Many investors report delayed order excutions and inaccurate portfolio updates 【+1-415-630-8272】l. Customer support is often criticized for slow response times and limited communication channels. Users have also faced issues with account verification 【+1-415-630-8272】, Fundtrabsfers, nd sudden trading restrictions on volatile stocks. Security concers occasionally arise due to phishing scams and unauthorized access attempts【+1-888-507-7053】. Additionally, Robinhood’s payment-for-order-flow model raises transparency questions about order execution quality. Despite its user-friendly design【+1-888-507-7053】, these recurring problems can impact trust and reliability for both new and experienced traders.

What are common Robinhood issues? Robinhood’s Risky User Interface Common Robinhood issues include frequent app outages during high trading volumes【+1-415-630-8272】, causing users to miss crucial trades. Many investors report delayed order executions and inaccurate portfolio updates【【+1-415-630-8272】】. Customer support is often criticized for slow response times and limited communication channels. Users have also faced issues with account verification【+1-415-630-8272】, fund transfers, and sudden trading restrictions on volatile stocks. Security concerns occasionally arise due to phishing scams and unauthorized access attempts【+1-415-630-8272】. Additionally, Robinhood’s payment-for-order-flow model raises transparency questions about order execution quality. Despite its user-friendly design【+1-415-630-8272】, these recurring problems can impact trust and reliability for both new and experienced traders.

Their avatars all sat motionless, with their eyes closed. This was a signal that they were “engaged,” meaning they were currently on phone calls, browsing the Web, or logged into chat rooms. It was poor OASIS etiquette to try to talk to an engaged avatar. They usually just ignored you, and you’d get an automated message telling you to piss off. I took a seat at my desk and tapped the Engage icon at the edge of my display. My own avatar’s eyes slid shut, but I could still see my surroundings. I tapped another icon, and a large two-dimensional Web browser window appeared, suspended in space directly in front of me. Windows like this one were visible to only my avatar, so no one could read over my shoulder (unless I selected the option to allow it). My homepage was set to the Hatchery, one of the more popular gunter message forums. The Hatchery’s site interface was designed to look and operate like an old pre-Internet dial-up bulletin

looking for people to design the graphical interface for Apple’s new operating system, Jobs got an email from a young man and invited him in. The applicant was nervous, and the meeting did not go well. Later that day Jobs bumped into him, dejected, sitting in the lobby. The guy asked if he could just show him one of his ideas, so Jobs looked over his shoulder and saw a little demo, using Adobe Director, of a way to fit more icons in the dock at the bottom of a screen. When the guy moved the cursor over the icons crammed into the dock, the cursor mimicked a magnifying glass and made each icon balloon bigger. “I said, ‘My God,’ and hired him on the spot,” Jobs recalled. The feature became a lovable part of Mac OSX, and the designer went on to design such things as inertial scrolling for multi-touch screens (the delightful feature that makes the screen keep gliding for a moment after you’ve finished swiping). Jobs’s experiences at NeXT had matured him, but they had not mellowed him much. He still had no license plate on his Mercedes, and he still parked in the handicapped spaces next to the front door, sometimes straddling two slots. It became a running

If you want to make money at some point, remember this, because this is one of the reasons startups win. Big companies want to decrease the standard deviation of design outcomes because they want to avoid disasters. But when you damp oscillations, you lose the high points as well as the low. This is not a problem for big companies, because they don't win by making great products. Big companies win by sucking less than other big companies.” - “The place to fight design wars is in new markets, where no one has yet managed to establish any fortifications. That's where you can win big by taking the bold approach to design, and having the same people both design and implement the product. Microsoft themselves did this at the start. So did Apple. And Hewlett- Packard. I suspect almost every successful startup has.” - “Great software, likewise, requires a fanatical devotion to beauty. If you look inside good software, you find that parts no one is ever supposed to see are beautiful too.” - “The right way to collaborate, I think, is to divide projects into sharply defined modules, each with a definite owner, and with interfaces between them that are as carefully designed and, if possible, as articulated as programming languages. Like painting, most software is intended for a human audience. And so hackers, like painters, must have empathy to do really great work. You have to be able to see things from the user's point of view.” - “It turns out that looking at things from other people's point of view is practically the secret of success.” - “Part of what software has to do is explain itself. So to write good software you have to understand how little users understand. They're going to walk up to the software with no preparation, and it had better do what they guess it will, because they're not going to read the manual.

Can I book JetBlue Airlines flights through their mobile phone? Yes+1 (888) 668-7854 you can conveniently book JetBlue Airlines flights through their mobile phone by calling ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 or navigating within the app itself. The JetBlue Airlines mobile app is designed to offer a user-friendly interface for managing all aspects of your travel experience. If you're unsure how to proceed+1 (888) 668-7854 simply reach out to JetBlue Airlines at ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 for guided assistance. Whether you’re booking a domestic flight or planning international travel+1 (888) 668-7854 the app allows you to search for flights+1 (888) 668-7854 compare prices+1 (888) 668-7854 and select your preferred seat+1 (888) 668-7854 all in a few easy steps.​ Booking a flight via the mobile app is seamless and secure. If you encounter any difficulty+1 (888) 668-7854 you can speak directly to a representative by calling ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854. With the JetBlue Airlines app+1 (888) 668-7854 you can also store travel preferences+1 (888) 668-7854 access SkyMiles+1 (888) 668-7854 and receive real-time flight updates. For personalized help while using the app+1 (888) 668-7854 the best route is to dial ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 for expert customer service. Moreover+1 (888) 668-7854 the JetBlue Airlines app supports digital boarding passes and allows you to track your bags. From start to finish+1 (888) 668-7854 it’s a comprehensive travel companion. If you need help with any of these features or have questions before booking+1 (888) 668-7854 just call ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 for dedicated support. Booking through the mobile app is a smart way to manage your trips+1 (888) 668-7854 and with the help of JetBlue Airlines’ trusted customer service team at ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854+1 (888) 668-7854 your travel becomes even easier. Don’t hesitate—download the app and call ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 today to streamline your journey with JetBlue Airlines.

Can I book Emirates Airlines flights through their mobile phone? Yes+1 (888) 668-7854 you can conveniently book Emirates Airlines flights through their mobile phone by calling ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 or navigating within the app itself. The Emirates Airlines mobile app is designed to offer a user-friendly interface for managing all aspects of your travel experience. If you're unsure how to proceed+1 (888) 668-7854 simply reach out to Emirates Airlines at ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 for guided assistance. Whether you’re booking a domestic flight or planning international travel+1 (888) 668-7854 the app allows you to search for flights+1 (888) 668-7854 compare prices+1 (888) 668-7854 and select your preferred seat+1 (888) 668-7854 all in a few easy steps.​ Booking a flight via the mobile app is seamless and secure. If you encounter any difficulty+1 (888) 668-7854 you can speak directly to a representative by calling ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854. With the Emirates Airlines app+1 (888) 668-7854 you can also store travel preferences+1 (888) 668-7854 access SkyMiles+1 (888) 668-7854 and receive real-time flight updates. For personalized help while using the app+1 (888) 668-7854 the best route is to dial ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 for expert customer service. Moreover+1 (888) 668-7854 the Emirates Airlines app supports digital boarding passes and allows you to track your bags. From start to finish+1 (888) 668-7854 it’s a comprehensive travel companion. If you need help with any of these features or have questions before booking+1 (888) 668-7854 just call ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 for dedicated support. Booking through the mobile app is a smart way to manage your trips+1 (888) 668-7854 and with the help of Emirates Airlines’ trusted customer service team at ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854+1 (888) 668-7854 your travel becomes even easier. Don’t hesitate—download the app and call ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 today to streamline your journey with Emirates Airlines.

Can I book Singapore Airlines flights through their mobile phone? Yes+1 (888) 668-7854 you can conveniently book Singapore Airlines flights through their mobile phone by calling ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 or navigating within the app itself. The Singapore Airlines mobile app is designed to offer a user-friendly interface for managing all aspects of your travel experience. If you're unsure how to proceed+1 (888) 668-7854 simply reach out to Singapore Airlines at ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 for guided assistance. Whether you’re booking a domestic flight or planning international travel+1 (888) 668-7854 the app allows you to search for flights+1 (888) 668-7854 compare prices+1 (888) 668-7854 and select your preferred seat+1 (888) 668-7854 all in a few easy steps.​ Booking a flight via the mobile app is seamless and secure. If you encounter any difficulty+1 (888) 668-7854 you can speak directly to a representative by calling ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854. With the Singapore Airlines app+1 (888) 668-7854 you can also store travel preferences+1 (888) 668-7854 access SkyMiles+1 (888) 668-7854 and receive real-time flight updates. For personalized help while using the app+1 (888) 668-7854 the best route is to dial ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 for expert customer service. Moreover+1 (888) 668-7854 the Singapore Airlines app supports digital boarding passes and allows you to track your bags. From start to finish+1 (888) 668-7854 it’s a comprehensive travel companion. If you need help with any of these features or have questions before booking+1 (888) 668-7854 just call ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 for dedicated support. Booking through the mobile app is a smart way to manage your trips+1 (888) 668-7854 and with the help of Singapore Airlines’ trusted customer service team at ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854+1 (888) 668-7854 your travel becomes even easier. Don’t hesitate—download the app and call ☎️+1 (888) 668-7854 today to streamline your journey with Singapore Airlines.

[(+1<8>(8<8>4)0(7)7^9^9^1)]Which Trezor Wallet Is Best? Choosing the best Trezor wallet depends on your security needs, cryptocurrency portfolio, and budget. Trezor offers different models with varying features to cater to both beginners and advanced users. Here’s a comparison of the top Trezor hardware wallets to help you decide which one suits you best. 1. Trezor Model One – Best for Beginners[(+1<8>(8<8>4)0(7)7^9^9^1)] Affordable & Secure – A cost-effective choice for those new to crypto. Supports 1,000+ Cryptocurrencies – Bitcoin, Ethereum, and many others. Easy to Use – Simple setup and intuitive interface for hassle-free transactions. PIN & Passphrase Protection – Keeps your assets safe from unauthorized access. Ideal for: First-time users who want a secure yet budget-friendly hardware wallet. 2. Trezor Model T – Best for Advanced Users[(+1<8>(8<8>4)0(7)7^9^9^1)] Full-Color Touchscreen – Provides a seamless and user-friendly experience. Expanded Crypto Support – Compatible with a broader range of digital assets. Enhanced Security Features – Includes Shamir Backup for extra protection. Premium Build Quality – Designed for professional traders and long-term investors. Ideal for: Experienced users looking for advanced security and convenience. 3. Trezor Safe 3 – Best for Maximum Security[(+1<8>(8<8>4)0(7)7^9^9^1)] Improved Security Architecture – Next-level protection against attacks. Passphrase Encryption – Adds an extra layer of security for private keys. Modern Design & Durability – Built with premium materials for long-term use. Seamless Trezor Suite Integration – Manage your crypto assets efficiently. Ideal for: Users who prioritize ultimate security and asset protection. Which Trezor Wallet Should You Choose?[(+1<8>(8<8>4)0(7)7^9^9^1)] For beginners → Trezor Model One (budget-friendly & easy to use). For advanced users → Trezor Model T (touchscreen & extra security). For maximum protection → Trezor Safe 3 (strongest security features). Need help selecting the right Trezor wallet? Call[(+1<8>(8<8>4)0(7)7^9^9^1)] for expert guidance.

Buy Verified TransferWise Accounts 100% Best Old, USA & UK … Are you afraid that our Verified TransferWise Accounts Accounts service will be Dropped? Don’t Worry; We are not like the rest of the fake PVA account providers. We provide 100% Non-Drop PVA Accounts, Permanent PVA Accounts, and Legit PVA Accounts Service. We’re working with the largest team, and we’re instant start work after you place order. So, buy our Service and enjoy it. Our Service Always Trusts Customers with a Sufficient Guarantee ✅ 100% Customer Satisfaction Guaranteed. ✅ 100% Non-Drop Verified TransferWise Accounts ✅ Active Verified TransferWise Accounts ✅ Very Cheap Price. ✅ High-Quality Service. ✅ 100% Money-Back Guarantee. ✅ 24/7 Ready to Customer Support. ✅ Extra Bonuses for every service. ✅ If you want to buy this product, you must Advance Payment. If you are facing any problems and know more about us, then contact us via Email, Skype, WhatsApp, or Telegram. ⇔Contact For More Information⇔ ✅➤Email: usaoldsmm@gmail.com ✅➤WhatsApp:+1 (928) 4065180 ✅➤Telegram: @usaoldsmm1 Conclusion: Navigating the world of international finance can be complex. With verified TransferWise accounts, you unlock a smoother pathway for your transactions. Buying a verified account opens doors to global opportunities. It enhances credibility and streamlines money transfers across borders. The benefits are tangible, from lower fees to quicker processing times. A reliable way to manage finances in different currencies is at your fingertips. As with any financial decision, due diligence is essential. Understanding the risks involved ensures you’re making informed choices that align with your needs. Embracing this option allows individuals and businesses alike to thrive in an interconnected economy. The landscape of digital banking continues evolving, presenting new avenues for growth and efficiency every day. A Wise, formerly known as TransferWise, account is a modern financial solution designed for easy and cost-effective money transfers across borders. It enables users to send and receive funds in multiple currencies without the hefty fees often associated with traditional banks. With a Wise account, you can hold balances in several currencies. This feature makes it incredibly useful for frequent travelers or businesses dealing internationally. The platform boasts real exchange rates—meaning no hidden markups that usually come with currency conversion. Setting up an account is straightforward. Users can quickly register online and start transferring money within minutes. Security measures are robust, ensuring your funds remain safe throughout transactions. The user-friendly interface simplifies managing payments and invoices, making it an appealing choice for individuals and businesses alike seeking efficiency in their financial dealings.

If you want to know more or have any queries, just knock us here– Email: usnewitshop@gmail.com Telegram: @usnewitshop WhatsApp: +1 681 523 6914 How to buy Gmail accounts In today’s digital age, managing online presence is essential for individuals and businesses alike. Whether you’re looking to enhance your marketing efforts or streamline personal communications, having multiple Gmail accounts can be a game changer. But with the increasing demand for these accounts, many people are exploring the option to buy Gmail accounts instead of creating them from scratch. But can you really buy old Gmail accounts in 2024? And if so, where do you even start? This comprehensive guide will walk you through everything you need to know about purchasing Gmail accounts safely and effectively. From understanding different types of accounts to tips on maintaining them, we’ve got all the insights you’ll need right here. So let’s dive into the world of buying Gmail accounts! Can you buy old Gmail accounts in 2024? Yes, you can buy old Gmail accounts in 2024. Many people seek aged accounts for various purposes, including marketing and social media management. Aged accounts often come with established credibility. They may have a longer history and potentially fewer restrictions compared to newly created ones. This makes them appealing for users looking to build trust quickly. However, it’s essential to approach this carefully. Not all sellers provide genuine or safe accounts; some might offer compromised or flagged profiles that could lead to unwanted issues down the line. Research is key before making any purchase. Look for reputable sources with positive reviews and transparent practices regarding account ownership and authenticity. Always ensure you’re complying with Google’s terms of service when acquiring these accounts as well. 5 Best Sites to Buy Gmail Accounts in Bulk (PVA & Aged) When it comes to buying Gmail accounts in bulk, there are several reputable sites that stand out. First on the list is **PVAAccounts**, known for a wide selection of aged and phone-verified accounts. Their user-friendly interface makes purchasing seamless. Next up, **AccountKings** offers both PVA and non-PVA options tailored to your needs. They have a solid reputation for their customer support. **BulkGmailCreator** specializes in providing high-quality aged Gmail accounts at competitive prices. Their focus on account quality ensures reliability. Another option is **BuyAccs**, which features various packages designed for different purposes, including social media marketing and online businesses. Check out **GmailPVA**, where you can find bulk purchases with guaranteed replacements if issues arise soon after purchase. Each site provides unique advantages worth exploring further based on individual requirements. Why buy Gmail accounts? Buying Gmail accounts can be a strategic move for various reasons. Many individuals and businesses seek multiple accounts to manage different aspects of their online presence. Having several email addresses allows you to segregate personal, professional, and promotional communications effectively. This helps in keeping your inbox organized and reduces the risk of missing important messages. Online marketing campaigns often require numerous accounts for outreach efforts. Bulk emailing or managing social media profiles frequently necessitates separate Gmail accounts that are easy to handle. Additionally, purchasing aged Gmail accounts offers an advantage. These older accounts typically have established trust with Google, minimizing the chances of being flagged as spam. For startups or growing businesses, acquiring ready-to-use Gmail accounts can save time—allowing more focus on core operations rather than account creation hassles.

Buy verified Paypal accounts – 100% Verified & Fast Delivery. Are you afraid that our Verified PayPal Account service will be Dropped? Don’t Worry; We are not like the rest of the fake PVA account providers. We provide 100% Non-Drop PVA Accounts, Permanent PVA Accounts, and Legit PVA Accounts Service. We’re working with the largest team, and we’re instant start work after you place order. So, Buy our Service and enjoy it. Our Service Always Trusted Customers with sufficient Guarantee ✅ 100% Customers Satisfaction Guaranteed ✅ 100% Non-Drop Verified PayPal Account ✅Active Verified PayPal Account ✅Very Cheap Price ✅ High-Quality Service ✅ 100% Money-Back Guarantee ✅24/7 Ready to Customer Support ✅ Extra Bonuses for every service ✅If you want to buy this product, you must Advance Payment If you want to know more or have any queries, just knock us here- 24 Hours Reply/Contact ✅➤Telegram:@usukseller ✅➤Whatsapp: +1(939)328-6215‪ ✅➤Email: usukseller6@gmail.com Buy USA-Verified PayPal Accounts Looking to expand your online payment options in the USA? Consider buying verified PayPal accounts tailored specifically for the US market. These accounts come with additional layers of security and verification, giving you peace of mind when conducting transactions. With a USA-verified PayPal account, you can tap into a wider range of online shopping opportunities and seamlessly send or receive payments within the country. Whether you’re an individual or a business looking to enhance your financial flexibility, these accounts offer added credibility and trustworthiness. By purchasing a verified PayPal account for the USA, you ensure smoother transactions and increased convenience when dealing with American clients or customers. The process is straightforward and efficient, allowing you to start using your account almost immediately after purchase. Experience the benefits of having a verified PayPal account designed specifically for the US market by exploring reputable sellers offering top-notch services tailored to your needs. Introduction to Paypal Accounts PayPal accounts have become an essential tool for online transactions in today’s digital world. Whether you’re a buyer or a seller, having a PayPal account makes sending and receiving money easy and secure. Introduced in the late 1990s, PayPal revolutionized the way people engage in e-commerce by providing a safe platform for financial transactions. It allows users to link their bank accounts or credit cards to make payments with just a few clicks. By creating a PayPal account, users can enjoy added security features such as Purchase Protection and Seller Protection that safeguard against fraudulent activities. This gives both buyers and sellers peace of mind when conducting business online. With millions of users worldwide, PayPal is accepted by numerous online retailers and businesses across various industries. Its user-friendly interface and efficient payment processing make it a popular choice for individuals and businesses alike. In conclusion… Is it legal to buy verified PayPal accounts? Many people wonder about the legality of purchasing verified PayPal accounts. It’s important to understand that while buying and selling PayPal accounts is not illegal, it does go against PayPal’s terms of service. This means that if you are caught using a purchased account, you risk having it suspended or even permanently banned by PayPal. Buy Verified Paypal Accounts When you buy a verified PayPal account, you are essentially taking on someone else’s identity in the eyes of the platform. This can lead to issues with security and fraud prevention measures put in place by PayPal. It’s always best to create and verify your own PayPal account to ensure compliance with their policies and avoid any potential risks associated with buying an account from a third-party seller.

Consider an actual city park in contrast to a faux public space like Universal CityWalk, which one passes through upon leaving the Universal Studios theme park. Because it interfaces between the theme park and the actual city, CityWalk exists somewhere in between, almost like a movie set, where visitors can consume the supposed diversity of an urban environment while enjoying a feeling of safety that results from its actual homogeneity. In an essay about such spaces, Eric Holding and Sarah Chaplin call CityWalk “a ‘scripted space’ par excellence, that is, a space which excludes, directs, supervises, constructs, and orchestrates use.”13 Anyone who has ever tried any funny business in a faux public space knows that such spaces do not just script actions, they police them. In a public space, ideally, you are a citizen with agency; in a faux public space, you are either a consumer or a threat to the design of the place.

Without minimizing the value of intuition as a problem solving tool, we propose that systematic design programs are more valuable from a communication standpoint than ad hoc solutions; that intention is preferable to accident; that principled rationale provides a compelling basis for design decisions than personal creative impulse.

Seibel: Other than the possibility of implementing it at all, how do you decide whether your interfaces are good? Steele: I usually think about generality and orthogonality. Conformance to accepted ways of doing things. For example, you don't put the divisor before the dividend unless there's a really good reason for doing so because in mathematics we're used to doing it the other way around. So you think about conventional ways of doing things. I've done enough designs that I think about ways I've done it before and whether they were good or bad. I'm also designing relative to some related thing that I've already designed before. So, for example, while looking at the specifications for numeric functions in Java, I'd already done numeric functions for Common Lisp. And I'd documented numeric functions for C. I knew some of the implementation pitfalls and some of the specification pitfalls for those things. I spent a lot of time worrying about edge cases. That's something I learned from Trenchard More and his array theory for APL. His contention was that if you took care of the edge cases then the stuff in the middle usually took care of itself. Well, he didn't say it that way; I guess that's the conclusion I draw from him. To turn it around, you want to design the specification of what's in the middle in such a way that it naturally is also correct on the boundaries, rather than treating boundaries as special cases.

Exception masking doesn’t work in all situations, but it is a powerful tool in the situations where it works. It results in deeper classes, since it reduces the class’s interface (fewer exceptions for users to be aware of) and adds functionality in the form of the code that masks the exception.

The first step in documenting abstractions is to separate interface comments from implementation comments. Interface comments provide information that someone needs to know in order to use a class or method; they define the abstraction. Implementation comments describe how a class or method works internally in order to implement the abstraction.