Chou En Lai Quotes

Former Chinese Premier Chou En-lai once observed: “One of the delightful things about Americans is that they have absolutely no historical memory.

Washington Post, was recorded in the “Special China Series,” documents issued by the State Department in August, 1969, but came to the notice of the public only when reported by Terence Smith in the New York Times. Mao and Chou En-lai, it turns out, approached President Roosevelt in January, 1945, “trying to establish relations with the United States in order to avoid total dependence on the Soviet Union” (italics added). It seems that Ho Chi Minh never received an answer, and information of the Chinese approach was suppressed because, as Professor Allen Whiting has commented, it contradicted “the image of monolithic Communism directed from Moscow.

Chou En-lai successfully conned Pandit Nehru regarding his real intentions. Nehru died a broken man, his credibility badly exposed and his non-alignment in shambles.

La condición humana está basada en una revolución real, que tuvo lugar en 1927, en Shanghai, del Partido Comunista chino y su aliado, el Kuomintang, contra los Señores de la Guerra, como se llamaba a los autócratas militares que gobernaban esa China descuartizada, en la que las potencias occidentales habían obtenido, por la fuerza o la corrupción, enclaves coloniales. Esta revolución fue dirigida por un enviado de Mao, Chou-En-Lai, en quien está inspirado, en parte, el personaje de Kyo. Pero, a diferencia de éste, Chou-En-Lai no murió, cuando, luego de derrotar al gobierno militar, el Kuomintang de Chiang Kai-chek se volvió contra sus aliados comunistas y, como describe la novela, los reprimió con salvajismo; consiguió huir y reunirse con Mao, a quien acompañaría en la Gran Marcha y secundaría como lugarteniente el resto de su vida.

When, in 1953, Chou En Lai, the Chinese Prime Minister, was in Geneva for the peace negotiations to end the Korean war, a French journalist asked him what does he think about the French Revolution; Chou replied: "It is still too early to tell.

In the course of his informant career Morris Childs would come to be on a first-name basis with Nikita Khrushchev, Leonid Brezhnev, Yuri Andropov, Mikhail Suslov (head of the Ideological Department of the Soviet Central Committee), and Boris Ponomarev (head of the International Department of the Soviet Central Committee), as well as meeting with MAO Zedong and Chou En Lai.19

EL ATLAS DEL CÁNCER A comienzos de la década de los setenta, el primer ministro de China, Chou En-Lai, estaba muriendo de cáncer. Cuando ya se encontraba en el estado terminal de la enfermedad, puso en marcha un estudio nacional para reunir información sobre una dolencia que no se llegaba a comprender correctamente. El trabajo se convertiría en un estudio monumental de los índices de mortalidad para doce tipos diferentes de cáncer y 880 millones de personas de más de 2.400 condados chinos. El estudio era sorprendente desde varias perspectivas. Se trataba del proyecto de investigación biomédico más ambicioso jamás realizado y en él participaban 650.000 trabajadores. Su resultado final fue un hermoso atlas codificado mediante colores que mostraba en qué regiones del país había una gran incidencia de ciertos tipos de cáncer y en cuáles eran prácticamente inexistentes.1

one must read a letter written in November 1950 by Sardar Patel to Nehru. He warned, ‘We can, therefore, safely assume that very soon they (the Chinese) will disown all the stipulations which Tibet has entered into with us in the past... The undefined state of the frontier and the existence on our side of a population with its affinities to Tibetans or Chinese has all the elements of potential trouble between China and ourselves.’ Patel wanted the Indian government immediately to set out a definite policy, particularly in regard to the McMahon Line. Had Patel’s advice been followed, we would not have suffered the humiliation of 1962. Despite advice from within the Congress, Nehru continued to champion China’s cause at the United Nations. It is now well known that even President Truman wanted India to commit itself to the defence of Tibetan independence. Chou En Lai continued to make a fool of the gullible Jawaharlal Nehru.

In response to a very long letter of Nehru of 26 September 1959, wrote Chou En-Lai on 7 November 1959:{URL21} “…As the Sino-Indian boundary has never been delimited and it is very long and very far or comparatively far from the political centres of the two countries, I am afraid that, if no fully appropriate solution is worked out by the two Governments, border clashes which both sides do not want to see may again occur in the future. And once such a clash takes place, even though a minor one, it will be made use of by people who are hostile to the friendship of our two countries to attain their ulterior objectives…