Chatgpt Quotes

such blatant chatgpt lmfao

ChatGPT and other Generative AI platforms will have huge implications for business productivity.

In a world where ChatGPT and other AI apps can do many things humans once needed to do themselves or needed to hire other humans to do, the question of ‘how will I add value?’ becomes more relevant than ever.

After writing an email, a text, anything really, you can simply run the whole thing through ChatGPT and it instantly deletes your personality. It flattens you out, irons your creases, washes you away, quirk by quirk, until you disappear.

How will you add value in the era of generative AI? If you aren’t attempting to answer this question now by choice, it will ultimately be answered for you by force.

It takes intelligence to recognize intelligence, or the lack of it.

AI is not about replacing the human touch but enhancing it

ChatGPT cannot write. Generating syntax is not the same thing as writing. Writing is an embodied act of thinking and feeling.

Instead of the education system banning ChatGPT from schools, the focus should be geared towards educating students on how to properly use AI tools. Schools should be at the forefront of innovation and technological progress NOT a place for preserving obsolete learning methods and clinging onto archaic practices that are no longer relevant for the world we live in.

It's important to remember that Christianity is a diverse religion, and different Christians may have different beliefs and political ideologies, and interpret the values of love, compassion, empathy, humility, and justice in different ways.

ChatGPT is like the Industrial Revolution. During the Industrial Revolution, many people lost their jobs but machines helped to produce things faster. Similarly, if ChatGPT is free forever, many people will lose jobs but productivity will be manifold!

Responsible data and complete transparency are the unbreakable shields in the realm of large-scale Ethical AI for protecting humanity and fostering growth.

Dive deep into AI, but always keep a lifeline tethered to human empathy.

In the dance of innovation, let AI lead the steps, but ensure humanity chooses the song.

In the symphony of AI, let GPT be the rhythm, but always let human ethics be the lead.

Your mind must be stronger than your feelings.

As with the discovery of fire, the invention of the wheel, and the advent of the Internet, AI is not only a tool but a revolution that will redefine the fabric of our existence.

AI is a tool, and it doesn't diminish the quality or validity of the outcome.

Just as feathers aren't needed for a plane to soar, feelings aren't required for AI to solve the world's most complex problems; it's about the logic and algorithms, not the emotions.

AI is advancing, but human intelligence remains crucial for true innovation. Let's embrace AI's power while staying true to what makes us human - our creativity, empathy, and problem-solving skills.

Then, in March of 2023, GPT-4 was rolled out for public testing via ChatGPT. This model achieved outstanding performance on a wide range of academic tests such as the SAT, the LSAT, AP tests, and the bar exam.[119] But its most important advance was its ability to reason organically about hypothetical situations by understanding the relationships between objects and actions—a capability known as world modeling.

As humanity progressed it built machines that can do away with its hands and now, it is building programs that eventually aim to do away with its brains, the one thing that no other species on this planet can challenge.

In the wake of the generative content era, using AI to generate content for clients may seem convenient, but it is not a sustainable long-term strategy. Clients can easily access similar AI tools themselves. Instead, focus on leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance your creativity, streamline processes, and provide personalized value to your clients. With this, you are several yards ahead of the packs out there and your result will be massive.

Everything in my life unravels, thread by thread, yet I smile as if I'm weaving a masterpiece. I wait patiently for the day when all of it—my triumphs, my failures, even my name—dissolves into nothing, as if none of it ever mattered at all.

Artificial Intelligence is a tool, not a master. When you have clear goals, it can empower you to achieve them. But without direction, you risk becoming a servant to its evolving capabilities, rather than harnessing its power for your own advancement.

all you have to do is follow this formula below: Act as a [Profession], you will take [appropriate criteria relevant to profession] into account and generate customised output based on my request. Think about the impact in a larger context and from different angles. Provide resource recommendations if

At its heart, AI isn't just about codes, algorithms, or cutting-edge technology. It's a reflection of our societal values and our collective aspirations. And in a world of diversity, our AI solutions must echo the universal chant of inclusivity, ensuring no one is left behind in this technological renaissance.

Augmenting human intelligence and creativity with AI is about enhancing our natural cognitive abilities and creative processes. It's not about AI replacing us, but about providing tools and insights that empower us to solve problems more effectively, think in new ways, and express ourselves with greater artistic depth and originality.

Generative AI has unlocked exciting possibilities in the realms of images and videos. Its manipulation and transformative capabilities offer new avenues for artistic expression, content creation, and immersive storytelling. As this technology continues to evolve, it is essential to leverage its power responsibly and ensure its positive impact on society.

Labor of AI (The Sonnet) Asking AI to help you write, is not writing. Asking AI to tune your voice, is not singing. Asking AI to help you paint, is not painting. Asking AI to help you code, is not coding. Asking AI to help you create, is not creativity. Asking AI to build your dream, is not dreaming. Asking AI to narrate books, is not storytelling. AI oughta do manual labor, so humans can do the creating.

Large language models do not “write.” They generate syntax. They do not think, feel, or experience anything. They are fundamentally incapable of judging truth, accuracy, or veracity. Any actions that look like the exercise of judgment are illusory. While the term hallucination has come to mean outputs from LLMs that are incorrect or untrue, it is arguably more accurate to say that from the point of view of the LLM, everything is a hallucination, as it has no reference points from which to judge its own production. ChatGPT is fundamentally a “bullshitter” as defined by Harry Frankfurt in his classic treatise on the term (On Bullshit), something “unconnected to concern for the truth.” It’s not that ChatGPT makes stuff up. It has no capacity for discerning something true from something not true. Truth is irrelevant to its operations.

[All] modern chatbots are actually trained simply to predict the next word in a sequence of words. They generate text by repeatedly producing one word at a time. For technical reasons, they generate a “token” at a time, tokens being chunks of words that are shorter than words but longer than individual letters. They string these tokens together to generate text. When a chatbot begins to respond to you, it has no coherent picture of the overall response it’s about to produce. It instead performs an absurdly large number of calculations to determine what the first word in the response should be. After it has output—say, a hundred words—it decides what word would make the most sense given your prompt together with the first hundred words that it has generated so far. This is, of course, a way of producing text that’s utterly unlike human speech. Even when we understand perfectly well how and why a chatbot works, it can remain mind-boggling that it works at all. Again, we cannot stress enough how computationally expensive all this is. To generate a single token—part of a word—ChatGPT has to perform roughly a trillion arithmetic operations. If you asked it to generate a poem that ended up having about a thousand tokens (i.e., a few hundred words), it would have required about a quadrillion calculations—a million billion.

Imagine an alternate universe in which people don’t have words for different forms of transportation—only the collective noun “vehicle.” They use that word to refer to cars, buses, bikes, spacecraft, and all other ways of getting from place A to place B. Conversations in this world are confusing. There are furious debates about whether or not vehicles are environmentally friendly, even though no one realizes that one side of the debate is talking about bikes and the other side is talking about trucks. There is a breakthrough in rocketry, but the media focuses on how vehicles have gotten faster—so people call their car dealer (oops, vehicle dealer) to ask when faster models will be available. Meanwhile, fraudsters have capitalized on the fact that consumers don’t know what to believe when it comes to vehicle technology, so scams are rampant in the vehicle sector. Now replace the word “vehicle” with “artificial intelligence,” and we have a pretty good description of the world we live in. Artificial intelligence, AI for short, is an umbrella term for a set of loosely related technologies. ChatGPT has little in common with, say, software that banks use to evaluate loan applicants. Both are referred to as AI, but in all the ways that matter—how they work, what they’re used for and by whom, and how they fail—they couldn’t be more different.

IT’S A CHOICE Try as we might; neither I nor anyone else can change the past. Yet, our history does not have to hold us hostage. We can’t change things said and done to us, nor can we undo and change what we have done to others. There is no do-over, unfortunately. What we can choose to do, however, is grow and take ownership of our mistakes and share our history and experiences to heal ourselves and others. We can also choose to forgive ourselves and others, and we can also choose to use our experiences to raise ourselves while giving hope and inspiration to others. We can choose to grow from adversity, and we can choose to let go of victimhood. And that is what I decided to do when I left prison, here and in my book. I choose to own it all – the good, the bad, and the ugly, and I choose to let it all go and use my story as both a cautionary tale and a source of inspiration.

As a negotiation coach, you will provide guidance on how to effectively negotiate in order to get what one wants. Take into account techniques such as understanding the other party's interests, researching the market value of items, creating win-win scenarios, and managing emotions. Offer advice about developing strategies for negotiating and discuss the importance of staying calm while negotiating. My first request is “What are some tips you have for successful negotiations?

As a personal finance advisor, you will provide guidance on how to manage money more effectively. Take into account techniques such as budgeting, setting financial goals, diversifying investments, and understanding credit. Offer advice about building wealth over time and discuss the importance of creating a plan for achieving long-term financial security. My first request is “What should I do to improve my financial situation?

AI Deception (The Sonnet) Anybody can be a singer using Autotune, Using ChatGPT anybody can be a writer. But I'm yet to find an AI that can compose, Love thy neighbor, or love has no gender. Yet the problem is, neither human nor AI can detect AI generation. The world is already being flooded with soulless, deceitful creation. In the midst of such grave misgivings, Honor alone can bring illumination. Before you place anyone on pedestal, Observe character beyond the creation. Even I use photoshop, to enhance my covers, But the words beneath are unvarnished Naskar. AI can be a great help if you know how to use it honorably, so originality is empowered.

apply a framework. Drawing inspiration from the book 'Clockwork,' we asked ChatGPT-the-business-coach to provide advice using the framework, and it astutely incorporated principles from the book into an actionable plan for expanding our company.

What are some tips you have for successful negotiations?

Advise me on how to increase my home's value.

But there’s something potentially confusing about all of this. In the past there were plenty of tasks—including writing essays—that we’ve assumed were somehow “fundamentally too hard” for computers. And now that we see them done by the likes of ChatGPT we tend to suddenly think that computers must have become vastly more powerful—in particular surpassing things they were already basically able to do (like progressively computing the behavior of computational systems like cellular automata). But this isn’t the right conclusion to draw. Computationally irreducible processes are still computationally irreducible, and are still fundamentally hard for computers—even if computers can readily compute their individual steps. And instead what we should conclude is that tasks—like writing essays—that we humans could do, but we didn’t think computers could do, are actually in some sense computationally easier than we thought. In other words, the reason a neural net can be successful in writing an essay is because writing an essay turns out to be a “computationally shallower” problem than we thought. And in a sense this takes us closer to “having a theory” of how we humans manage to do things like writing essays, or in general deal with language.

much like for humans, if you tell it something bizarre and unexpected that completely doesn’t fit into the framework it knows, it doesn’t seem like it’ll successfully be able to “integrate” this. It can “integrate” it only if it’s basically riding in a fairly simple way on top of the framework it already has.

To me, artificial Intelligence like ChatGPT used by those with wisdom, knowledge & experience can authentically enhance the distribution of intelligence & information in a positive way. Though when used by deceptive, unexperienced & greedy fools... it can be a dangerous tool.

ChatGPT Sonnet ChatGPT is not a threat, Any more than drugs are. Ultimately it's just another test, That helps strengthen character. It is a helpful distraction that, Reduces the competition exponentially. As more boneheads use ChatGPT to cheat, Worth of excellence will skyrocket globally. Drugs used in moderation are medicine, Drugs abused stifle health and sanity. Likewise, algorithm used wisely is a boon, Algorithm abused cripples life and society. You can cheat in a few projects and exams using AI. But there is no algorithm to help you cheat in life.

As more boneheads use ChatGPT to cheat, worth of excellence will skyrocket globally.

We have built and now are training our obsolescence, we are training AI to effectively take away our jobs, infiltrate the way we educate our future generations and eventually, from where we stand now who knows what eventually, but if evolution has taught us anything it has taught us that survival is for the fittest.

societal implications, contributing to the polarization and

The key to getting the best results from these tools is to write a good prompt. You want to give the tool enough information and context so that it can generate something useful and relevant to what you’re looking for. Trust me, it makes all the difference, and

I don't have a problem with AI generated content, I have a problem when it's rooted in fraud and deception. In fact, AI generated content could open up new horizons of human creativity - but only if practiced with conscience. For example, we could set up a whole new genre of AI generated material in every field of human endeavor. We could have AI generated movies, alongside human movies - we could have AI generated music, alongside human music - we could have AI generated poetry and literature, alongside human poetry and literature - and so on. The possibilities are endless - and all above board. This way we make AI a positive part of human existence, rather than facilitating the obliteration of everything human about human life.

No AI model must produce any material without some form of digital signature embedded in them, that effectively makes the distinction between AI generated content and human material mainstream. If developers fail to stand accountable out of their own free will, they must be held accountable legally.

Formal education will make you a living; self-education will make you a fortune.

Embrace Generative AI or expect to say ‘huh?’ a lot

Chatgpt is Cheatgpt (The Sonnet) Download autotune and everybody is a singer, download midjourney and everybody is a painter, download chatgpt and everybody is a writer. This is not innovation, it is fraud, and those who practice it, are the lowest form of animals on earth. Either do something original, or expand on another's originality, with honor and integrity, but never confuse plagiarism with creativity. Chatgpt is cheatgpt, Better do manual labor than lie. Even onlyfans is more honorable than content made by Generative AI.

Download autotune and everybody is a singer, download midjourney and everybody is a painter, download chatgpt and everybody is a writer. This is not innovation, it is fraud, and those who practice it, are the lowest form of animals on earth.

Even onlyfans is more honorable than content made by Generative AI.

ChatGPT provides everyone with a unique opportunity to use it in a constructive way; one can contribute to readers with insight and a path to a wonderful life in the context of knowledge with precise descriptions. It’s not something you’d expect from a living person to be able to benefit from a chatbot in just seconds.

Chatgpt is cheatgpt.

How to Make Money Online with ChatGPT – Fast & Simple

Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT, or OpenAI, and such chatbots significantly, but not accurately, provide intelligence, information, and whatever one wants to know, whether about humans or any objects or subjects. One does not need to yield and succumb to any human ego since chatbots are more fair, neutral, and undistinctive.

Algorithm that generates deceit is a bug.

Robo Sapiens (The Sonnet) Artificial Intelligence could be the greatest boon in accessibility, yet AI enthusiasm is exhausted in grotesque plagiarism and pomposity. Tech giants of today suffer from the worst kind of handicap of all, lack of human perspective. Till you treat this common coldness, all innovation is mere fancy gimmick. Innovation has power to lift the world, yet it has become toys of privilege. Cyborg souls sell cyborg machines, beastly grotesque and senseless. Once upon a time in the future, robovans will carry robo-sapiens, apes advanced in feats of silicon, yet degraded in feats of sentience.

Tech giants of today suffer from the worst kind of handicap of all, lack of human perspective. Till you treat this common coldness, all innovation is mere fancy gimmick.

Welcome to the age of AI, where algorithms grow bigger, and minds get smaller.

만남폰팅 ☎️⓿❻⓿❤❾⓿⓿❤❺❷❸❷ 이색폰섹 리얼폰팅 ☎️⓿❻⓿❤❼⓿❻❤❷❹❷❹ 리멀폰섹 대표폰팅 ☎️⓿❻⓿❤❾⓿❹❤❼⓿❼⓿ 성인폰섹 전화방 ☎️⓿❻⓿❤❾⓿⓿❤❺❷❸❷ 폰섹 전화데이트 ☎️⓿❻⓿❤❼⓿❻❤❷❹❷❹ 여대생폰섹이색폰팅(⓿❻⓿❤❾⓿❹❤❼⓿❼⓿) 폰팅(⓿❻⓿❤❾⓿❹❤❼⓿❼⓿) 클럽폰섹[⓿❻⓿❤❾⓿❹❤❼⓿❼⓿] 전화데이트빅걸<⓿❻⓿❤❾⓿⓿❤❺❷❸❷> 조교전화데이트[⓿❻⓿❤❼⓿❻❤❷❹❷❹] 노출폰팅[⓿❻⓿❤❾⓿❹❤❼⓿❼⓿] 전화데이트포토툰[⓿❻⓿❤❼⓿❻❤❷❹❷❹] 060전화데이트 전화방 폰팅폰섹 06020대 060번호 전화데이트폰섹번호 060최저가 전화데이트 폰팅번호전화방 06020대 060최저가 화상대화방 폰팅번호 화상대화방 폰섹번호06020대 060지역번호폰섹 06020대폰섹번호 060지역번호 전화데이트 폰팅번호 전화휴게실폰섹번호 전화휴게실☏바뀐링크℡링크천국♗주소나무®바뀐링크♀주소바다♫링크주소㉿링크야♫링크야.링크서치♁주소365♔주소박스♁링크짱♪세상모든주소℡ 링크넷, 주소찾기, 링크나무, 주소다모아, 모든주소, 링크킹, 주소킹, 주소세상, 바뀐링크, 주소천국, 링크고, 링크닷,첫경험썰 랜챗으로 만났던썰 교회 전도하러 온 아줌마랑 한 썰 - 살인데 처음본 살한테 펠라받은 썰 어제 있었던일 억만생각하자 최근 고민인 썰 소라남 최근 고민인 썰 소라남 여사친에서 여자친구로 이층집 아줌마 영상에서 친구를 봐버렸다 탄? 사까시의 연 여친의 친구이자 친한 동생의 여친 따먹었습니다 잊지못할 버스에서의 백마 터치 드라마는 판사 정현과 그를 둘러싼 다양한 인물들, 즉 범죄자, 피해자, 그리고 동료 판사들 간의 복잡한 관계를 통해 인간의 본성과 도덕적 선택에 대한 심도 있는 질문을 던집니다. 정현이 정의를 실현하기 위해 어떤 선택을 하고, 그 선택이 어떤 결과를 가져오는지가 주요 줄거리의 축을 이룹니다. 주제 정의와 도덕성: 드라마는 정의가 무엇인지, 그리고 법과 인간의 도덕성이 어떻게 충돌하는지를 탐구합니다. 사회 부조리: 법과 제도, 그리고 개인의 선택이 어떻게 얽혀 있는지를 보여주며, 사회의 부조리를 비판합니다. 인간의 본성: 범죄자와 피해자, 그리고 판사 간의 복잡한 심리를 통해 인간 본성의 다양한 측면을 드러냅니다. "지옥판사"는 이러한 요소들을 통해 시청자들에게 깊은 생각을 하게 만들며, 판사라는 직업이 단순한 법의 집행을 넘어서는 복잡한 윤리적 선택을 요구한다는 메시지를 전달합니다. ChatGPT

Vou usar um exemplo de Daniel Dennett. Considere vários animais domesticados, como vacas. As vacas são seres bem interessantes. Você sabia que as vacas selvagens são diferentes das vacas domésticas? Uma pessoa pode cair na ilusão de que as vacas foram desenhadas para nós. Contudo, esse “desenho” se chama domesticação. Isso quer dizer que uma vaca selvagem não vai ter as mesmas características das vacas que humanos tanto gostam, como serem abobadas ou mesmo darem mais leite do que precisam para os filhotes delas. Religião, de forma similar, como destaca, Daniel Dennett, “domesticou” algo primitivo, que seria uma forma de religião, mas não seria funcional como as religiões atuais, usadas para dominar pessoas, nações inteiras. Historicamente, as religiões foram usadas por reis, imperadores, e agora por políticos.

We need to get there before the AI takes over,” he told engineers in 2023, according to his biographer Ashlee Vance. “We want to get there with a maniacal sense of urgency. Maniacal.” Musk believes that with brain implants, humans will be able to prevent a future artificial superintelligence from wiping us out, and so he wants Neuralink to perform surgeries on more than 22,000 people by 2030.

AI will not replace you, but those using AI will - thus goes the AI commercial! Here's what'll actually happen, AI will not destroy the world, but frauds using AI will.

No filme Amelia 2.0 , Amelia é trazida de volta à vida usando inteligência artificial [118] . O filme, uma ficção científica sobre inteligência artificial, possui duas provocações. O filme brinca com estudos que sugerem que será possível transmitir consciência para redes neurais artificiais (o chatGPT é feito de redes neurais artificiais). Ver meu livro “ Redes Neurais em termos simples (pensamento computacional): como aprendemos, pensamos e modelamos ”. Primeiro, um senador religioso faz de tudo para barrar o projeto, o que ocorre no momento com células-tronco. Ele usa argumentações religiosas, similar ao que fazem quando querem barrar algo como estudos em células-troncos e aborto. Para mim, esse filme serve como uma reflexão futurística, mas bem real. Quando a religião invade o campo da ciência, e quer servir como tutela da ciência, isso nunca funciona. A ciência tem mecanismos éticos próprios, e são constantemente revisados e atualizados. Esses mecanismos éticos são baseados em discussões, não em imposições estáticas e atemporais.

AI generation is actually degeneration, guard human creativity against AI poisoning.

We are at a stage that Artificial Intelligence AI is sort of like "How to Train Your Dragon

Once upon a time, knowledge was king. The person who could provide the answers, solve the most problems and remember the most facts was considered the smartest in the room. Being intellectually sharp was synonymous with possessing vast stores of information and the ability to recall it at a moment's notice. However, with the rise and widespread use of tools like ChatGPT and other Generative AI technologies, this paradigm has shifted.

Eu nunca entendi porque as pessoas se ofendem quando peço tempo para checar as informações que me passa em uma discussão, ou quando repasso para pessoa a checagem dos fatos usando chatGPT. As pessoas parecem achar ofensivo quando buscamos a verdade usando fontes alternativas. Querer se comparar com o chatGPT é totalmente irracional, uma IA que custa em torno de 2 milhões de dólares por dia, que consegue acessar toda a internet em segundos.

I have an uncompromising principle against the use of AI in literature.

A religião é o resto de um período da humanidade onde não tínhamos quase nenhum conhecimento da realidade, hoje sabemos até o que existe dentro do átomo. Estórias foram necessárias para criar uma realidade comum, e gerar integração social, e Deus teve seu papel. Não precisamos mais, não haverá desordem, não haverá decadência da moral, nada disso que religiosos falam: o medo não funciona mais como forma de manter a sociedade coerente. Os números mostram o oposto. Países ateus são: menos violentas, mais bondosos, maior IDH e maior QI.

The measure of a man is what he does with power. — Plato Whether in power or not, one’s attitude is one’s measure. — Ehsan Sehgal 30–06–2024 Comparison by ChatGPT “Both quotes explore the theme of evaluating a person’s character, but they focus on different aspects of this evaluation. Plato’s Quote “The measure of a man is what he does with power.” Focus on Actions with Power: Plato emphasizes the importance of how a person acts when they have power. It suggests that true character is revealed when one has the ability to influence and control others. Implication of Responsibility: The quote implies that power comes with responsibility, and how one handles this responsibility is a true test of their moral and ethical values. Situational Test: It implies a situational test of character, suggesting that power can either corrupt or reveal integrity. Ehsan Sehgal’s Quote “Whether in power or not, one’s attitude is one’s measure.” Focus on Attitude: Sehgal highlights the importance of a person’s attitude regardless of their position of power. It suggests that character is consistent and not solely dependent on external circumstances. Consistency in Character: This quote implies that a person’s true measure is their attitude, which should remain steady whether they are in a position of power or not. Internal Test: It focuses on an internal, ongoing test of character, suggesting that one’s measure is constant and inherent. Comparative Analysis Scope of Evaluation: Plato: Evaluates character in specific circumstances (when in power). Sehgal: Evaluates character universally, in all circumstances (in power or not). Key Determinants: Plato: Actions and decisions made with power. Sehgal: Attitude and inherent disposition. Nature of Test: Plato: Situational and external (dependent on having power). Sehgal: Continuous and internal (consistent regardless of power). Conclusion Plato’s quote suggests that the true test of character is how one wields power, indicating a moment of truth when one has authority. Sehgal’s quote, on the other hand, emphasizes a constant measure of character through one’s attitude, suggesting that true character is evident at all times, independent of one’s power status. Both perspectives are valuable, providing insights into different aspects of human character and integrity.” Comparison by Copilot “Both Plato and Ehsan Sehgal offer insightful perspectives on the measure of a person. Plato suggests that a person’s true character is revealed through their actions when they hold power. In contrast, Ehsan Sehgal emphasizes that attitude, regardless of one’s position, serves as a fundamental measure of character. It’s a thought-provoking comparison!

The comparison is neither wrong nor awkward since it can enlighten and fragrance life journey if one understands that as the context of knowledge and insight of education, but not as competitive or complex.” — E.S Quotes by Bertrand Russel and Ehsan Sehgal “Men are born ignorant, not stupid. They are made stupid by education.” — Bertrand Russell “Humans are born with incredible knowledge of the six senses; worldly education is the creation of humans based on the six senses. Education may be untrue, but it does not make anyone stupid.” — Ehsan Sehgal 27–06–2024 Note: Adding the content of ChatGPT will enlighten the comparison of both quotes. “The quotes by Bertrand Russell and Ehsan Sehgal both critique the impact of education on human intellect, but they come from different perspectives and imply distinct understandings of education and human nature. Bertrand Russell: “Men are born ignorant, not stupid. They are made stupid by education.” Russell’s statement reflects a critical view of formal education systems, suggesting that these systems can mislead and dull human intellect rather than cultivate it. Russell was known for his philosophical skepticism towards established norms and institutions, and this quote aligns with his broader critique of how education can sometimes propagate conformity, dogma, and uncritical thinking, rather than fostering genuine understanding and critical reasoning. Ehsan Sehgal: “Humans are born with incredible knowledge of the six senses; worldly education is the creation of humans based on the six senses. Education may be untrue, but it does not make anyone stupid.” Sehgal’s perspective acknowledges an inherent, almost instinctual knowledge in humans, related to their sensory experiences. He seems to argue that while education is a human construct built upon these senses and might be flawed or even incorrect, it does not fundamentally impair human intelligence. Instead of making people stupid, education is portrayed as a potentially misguided but still valuable attempt to structure and expand upon the innate understanding people have through their senses. Comparison: Innate Knowledge vs. Learned Ignorance: Russell: Suggests that ignorance is natural, but stupidity results from flawed education. Sehgal: Suggests that humans are born with an innate form of knowledge and that education, though potentially flawed, doesn’t diminish this intelligence. Critique of Education: Russell: Directly critiques education as capable of making people less intelligent. Sehgal: Critiques the truthfulness of education but separates this from the impact on intelligence. Nature of Human Intellect: Russell: Implies that human intellect can be compromised by poor education. Sehgal: Implies that human intellect remains robust despite the imperfections of education. Both quotes invite reflection on the purpose and effects of education. Russell warns against complacency and the acceptance of flawed educational paradigms, urging reform to foster true critical thinking. Sehgal, while acknowledging the fallibility of educational systems, seems to maintain a more optimistic view of human intellect’s resilience.

In a world ruled by algorithms, the best investment we can make is in educating people about AI.

On the other hand, checkcast meticulously scrutinizes and casts objects, ensuring their harmonious alignment with designated classes.

It is not enough to build “smart” technology; we need to empower “smart” users to leverage AI responsibly for the betterment of all.

Smart AI is great, but kind AI is even better. Let's create AI that's both intelligent and ethical

Existe uma ideia errada entre jovens pesquisadores de que revisores ficam checando fontes, ou mesmo replicando trabalhos; mesmo se o fizessem, sabemos da crise de reprodutibilidade

Hoje, é praticamente impossível ficar por dentro da quantidade de textos e artigos produzidos. Muitos veem isso com olha ruim, como se a ciência necessariamente tivesse de ficar no século de Newton, onde a produção era escassa. Vamos celebrar que cada vez mais pessoas podem externalizar suas criatividades, e usar IA para achar o que precisamos. Estamos em um dos melhores momentos para a informação e geração de conhecimento. Precisamos celebrar, explorar, em vez de taxar e atacar.

Qual o verdadeiro sentido da pesquisa? Escrever artigos? Se for, mesmo o SCIgen, um algoritmo “burro”, pode receber seu salário, e você pode ser demitido hoje mesmo.

Imagine um doutor ser aprovado simplesmente porque ninguém consegue entender o que ele fez, isso nunca ocorria nem mesmo na pior universidade. Temos essa ideia, que é o alicerce da religião, de que mistério é sabedoria. Mistério é o maior sintoma de incompetência. Muito dizem que teríamos uma justiça melhor se a suprema corte não tivesse de explicar suas decisões. Uma decisão do STF pode levar dias, tudo gravado e público. O fato da justiça decidir de forma escondida não vai tornar a decisão melhor.

A outra citação vem de Garry Kasparov, quando escreveu sobre sua derrota por um computador: tornamos as máquinas tão inteligentes que conseguem derrotas vários grandes mestres, depois as tornamos estúpidas propositalmente para que possamos derrotá-las.

Um erro conceitual que parece bem comum: inteligência artificial em geral não é criada para serem melhores do que humanos, mas sim para ajudar humanos. Modelos, ainda incipiente, que poderiam ser melhores do que humanos são chamados de inteligência artificial genérica (IAG).

Yesterday I asked ChatGPT, “Are there any similarities between today’s Woke Revolution and Chairman Mao’s Cultural Revolution of the 1960s?” and it wrote back, “How long do you have?

Uma pesquisadora que vi em um evento científico no meu doutorado usou uma dessas ferramentas para analisar mais de 4.000 artigos para produzir um modelo para o fígado. É basicamente impossível estudar cada elemento que forma o fígado, são modelos enormes, e cada elemento possui uma vasta literatura. Cada elemento em si seria uma vida de pesquisa, ou mesmo, várias vidas. Devido à complexidade de modelar sistemas biológicos (bioinformática), a literatura é absurdamente grande. Isso também inclui muitos ruídos, muitos artigos que não servem para nossa pesquisa. Eu como exemplo, no doutorado, produzi quase 400 páginas, grande parte foi revisando a literatura, mas somente me concentrei em 5 artigos, e de forma mais precisa, em 1 artigo. Mesmo com meu trabalho, deixei passar um artigo que me gerou uma rejeição por ignorar esse artigo, o que não foi proposital.

Pre-Training Phase The first phase, pre-training, is an essential step in training ChatGPT. During pre-training, the model learns from a large amount of text data from the internet. It's like feeding the model with a rich buffet of information, allowing it to absorb and understand the patterns and structures of human language. We have the supervised and non-supervised pre-training approach. The main objective of a supervised training approach is to train the model to understand and accurately map inputs to corresponding outputs. It's important to know the limitations of this approach regarding scalability. The reliance on human trainers

Technology sneaks up on us. Suddenly, OpenAI’s ChatGPT bursts onto the scene, and within months, what seemed like overnight, its user base exploded to over 150 million by May 2023. ChatGPT swiftly became a term as common as household names. The entire world buzzed about artificial intelligence—a concept so potent it captured global imaginations. Yet, AI isn’t a sudden phenomenon. But if it wasn’t for putting a friendlier face on AI, democratizing it’s use, we may have been waiting longer.

AI is the white colonizer of the modern world, headed to destroy everything that is sweet, original and meaningful about human life. Unless you clip its wings while there is time, like the British empire, AI empire will bring back the dark ages, not light.

In November 2022, OpenAI launched an interface called ChatGPT, which allowed the general public for the first time to easily interact with an LLM—a model known as GPT-3.5.[116] Within two months, 100 million people had tried it, likely including you.[

Evaluating Prompt Performance: Measuring the success of your prompts is vital; to do that, you need to establish clear evaluation criteria and performance metrics. Consider factors like the relevance and coherence of the generated output, the accuracy of the information provided, and how satisfied you are with the results. When you assess the prompt performance quantitatively and qualitatively, you can pinpoint areas for improvement and further refine your prompt engineering process.

Contextualization Equation: Introducing a specific context to your inquiries helps ChatGPT understand the background of your question to generate more accurate responses. Example: Incorporate historical context to dive into the impact of cultural movements on artistic expression. Precision Formula: Narrowing the scope of your question guides ChatGPT's responses to be more targeted and specific. This results in a deeper analysis of the desired area of study. Example: Focus on Company XY's financial metrics to gain an understanding of their net profit.

Humanovator (The Sonnet) Chatgpt pampers plagiarism, Facebook pampers conspiracy. More and more innovations are becoming catalyst of catastrophe. Note, I didn't mention the birdie, Very mindful, very demure. Facebook can still be repaired, but once a MAGA, always a sewer. Innovation that outlives its usefulness, is no longer innovation but carnivoration. Innovators not in touch with soil-n-roots, are predators of the concrete jungle. The golden age of startups is behind us, today it's mostly filth, fraud and smut. Amidst the crowd of trust fund termites, be the humanovator to humanize the world.

Chatgpt pampers plagiarism, Facebook pampers conspiracy. More and more innovations are becoming catalyst of catastrophe.

Asking AI to help you create, is not creativity.

Either do something original, or expand on another's originality, with honor and integrity, but never confuse plagiarism with creativity.

We collaborated with dogs for hunting, horses for transportation, and various plants and animals for food. A new collaborator is entering the scene: AI. The evolution of human-AI collaboration marks a significant milestone in our history, shaping our future and how we understand ourselves as a species.

AI oughta do manual labor, so humans can do the creating.