Article 370 Quotes

On 27 November 1963, Pandit Nehru confirmed on the floor of Parliament that he had earlier made the statement: “‘Article 370 of the Constitution would be eroded progressively.

Does Article 370 prevent anyone from buying property in the state?

Was Article 370 promised at the time of the signing of the IoA? If Article 370 is repealed, would J&K cease to be a part of India, as the National Conference and some separatist groups are claiming today?

Conflict " There's always everything there to lose in conflicts. The damage is collateral whether you want to be a part of it or you are forced to join it.

Family "Life is extremely unpredictable and has this funny way of springing surprises; sometimes kind or otherwise. We can survive if we have our anchors strongly pivoted and buried deep; our Family and Friends. Don't forget to spend time with them.

Victim " The biggest victims of our Armed Forces’ Nationalism are their children who grow up with the absentee parents either serving their duties or having lost their lives in avoidable battles.

Love " Love is not about finding the right blend of desired attributes in a person. It is a journey to discover the other as well as yourself and to accept each other with the flaws, the imperfections they come with.

POLITICS When POLITICS becomes the Chessboard for THE GAME OF THRONES.... The Battles are inevitable...

Five years ago, on August 5, 2019, the status of our state Jammu and Kashmir was unconstitutionally abolished and it was divided into two union territories. Article 370 of the Constitution of India, under which the relationship of the state with India was linked under certain conditions until the final resolution of the issue, which was considered by the common people and legal and constitutional experts as the basis of India-Kashmir relationship, was abolished. INTERNAL SOVEREIGNTY HAS BEEN ROBBED!!! The President of the Republic issued an Ordinance which also abolished Article 35A which guaranteed the protection of our government jobs and our trade and gave non-state residents the right to get government jobs and buy land here. went!!! Summary Our identity Our identity has been completely destroyed!!! The Assembly was also dissolved under the People's Representation Act!!! New assembly elections were not held Bureaucracy has been ruling us for 5 years now!!!

India’s ruling pro-hindu militant Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) used the the disputed Kashmir crisis to project Modi as a strong leader against Pakistan — capitalizing on this opportunity ahead of India’s general election, which takes place from April 11 to May 19. Recent surveys suggest Modi and his party have profited from heightened nationalist sentiment with a modest but visible bump in popularity.

On Feb. 26, the IAF launched airstrikes against what it said were terrorist camps in Pakistan. Pakistan retaliated with fighter planes dropping their payloads in Kashmir and, in an ensuing air battle, shot down an Indian MiG-21 warplane and captured its pilot. India claims the MiG-21 pilot shot down a more advanced Pakistan F-16 fighter aircraft before his own aircraft was downed — but Pakistan’s civilian and military leadership vehemently denied this.

Before August 5, 2019, the Supreme Court had no jurisdiction over Jammu and Kashmir, now? And that too is being challenged within the same Supreme Court against the indian parliament decision in August 5. This is clear evidence that the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India on 3 points and Article 370 were both temporary, if 370 was temporary. Of course, the accession was also temporary. Jammu and Kashmir is still a disputed territory within the UN charter.

The pro-independent Kashmir organisations , on the other hand, would love to see the constitutional arrangement be scrapped because Kashmir in their view would then “become a clear Indian military occupation” without a “legal instrument” guiding its relationship with the Indian Union.

New Delhi has historically swung from promising Kashmiris a referendum that allows them to exercise the right to self-determination, to the idea of integrating Kashmir fully into the Indian Union by any means necessary. Today, conditions in the state suggest that any attempt to abrogate Article 370 may actually worsen the conflict in Kashmir and prove counter-productive to any attempt at “full integration”.

People keep talking about Article 370 being a temporary provision. It was temporary because a plebiscite had to decide which dominion disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir would join. That plebiscite never happened. India has played its games and it continues to play its games.

A bitter decision has to be taken for Kashmir solution "Jammu and Kashmir did not join India, Article 370 is the foundation of relations with the Indian Federation.

Under the Delhi Agreement of 1952, the state was given complete internal autonomy. The Delhi agreement was decided between Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah and the Government of India, in the same agreement, Article 370 was brought into existence and it was included in the Indian Constitution. The creator of Marza Muhammad Afzal Begi was under Article 370, the state had its own separate flag, its own court, its own high court, its election commission, etc. But Khawaja Ghulam Mohammad Sadiq, late in 1964, to weaken Article 370 The positions of the Prime Minister and President of the state were changed to the positions of Chief Minister and Governor respectively Central laws were implemented Supreme Court of India and Election Commission of India's jurisdiction was extended up to the limits of Jammu and Kashmir!!!

The people of Jammu and Kashmir are defending the Indian occupation with all their might in the Supreme Court by declaring the Indian occupation as legitimate, that is why it is called Article-370 "Permanent provisions", but it is beyond understanding what the common Indians are doing to the world by calling it A-370 "Temporary provisions۔

The truth is that between the late Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah and the Union of India in 1952 under the "Delhi Agreement" / "Delhi Agreement", the relationship of Jammu and Kashmir with India has been added subject to Article 370. Under the "Delhi Agreement" the "Special Status" or "Internal Sovereignty" of the state of Jammu and Kashmir has been recognized. It may be asked what constitutional relationship is left between India and Jammu and Kashmir after the abolition of Article 370 or the state. "India-Kashmir relationship" and Article 370 of the Constitution are "inseparable" and cannot be separated from each other.

When truth is replaced by silence, the silence is a lie.’ —Yevgeny Yevtushenko

Article 370 of the Indian Constitution dictates that the state of Jammu and Kashmir govern all matters except those surrendered to the Union of India.

Indian courts had long ruled that they were unable to intervene in the rights of non-state subjects because Article 370 of the Indian Constitution dictates that the state of Jammu and Kashmir govern all matters except those surrendered to the Union of India. Recently, however, in a case challenging the limitations of Indian federal guidlines as they relate to federal finance laws, the court asserted broadly (and against decades of legal precedent) that the constitution of Jammu and Kashmir did not supersede that of India: It is rather disturbing to note that various parts of the judgment speak of the absolute sovereign power of the State of Jammu & Kashmir. It is necessary to reiterate that Section 3 of the Constitution of Jammu & Kashmir, which was framed by a Constituent Assembly elected on the basis of universal adult franchise, makes a ringing declaration that the State of Jammu & Kashmir is and shall be an integral part of the Union of India.

Among the other legislations introduced by Atal, one was to amend the Constitution so as to remove Article 370 that gave special status to J&K. Debated in the House twice, the amendment put forth by Atal, however, lost in the voting.