Academia Aesthetic Quotes

Autumn is a poem - while you fall for everything, you remember that there is something worth dying for.

We were never supposed to be in love; for everything that exists inside a heart eventually dies.

They danced wildly in the forest, swaying with the tall trees and the howling wind.

While we kept on dancing our souls delicately embraced.

Beautiful things are quiet beings.

We always hide something of ourselves whenever we create something.

what type of jam would i be? I’d like to think I’m a strawberry or raspberry jam, but I think it would be really cool to be pine cone jam or smth my mom said that they had it in Russia. But what if I was a poison berry jam, that would be so dark academia aesthetic! I know that carrot and tomato jams exist, but I was one of those stubborn picky kids who hated vegetables so I’m probably not that. I know I’d be a natural jam tho, non of that artificial flavoring around here

What we outlive becomes our cage eventually.

I can not be a part of myself - for everything that creates my soul incompletes my heart.

School of Resentment is a term coined by critic Harold Bloom to describe related schools of literary criticism which have gained prominence in academia since the 1970s and which Bloom contends are preoccupied with political and social activism at the expense of aesthetic values.[1] Broadly, Bloom terms "Schools of Resentment" approaches associated with Marxist critical theory, including African American studies, Marxist literary criticism, New Historicist criticism, feminist criticism, and poststructuralism—specifically as promoted by Jacques Lacan, Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault. The School of Resentment is usually defined as all scholars who wish to enlarge the Western canon by adding to it more works by authors from minority groups without regard to aesthetic merit and/or influence over time, or those who argue that some works commonly thought canonical promote sexist, racist or otherwise biased values and should therefore be removed from the canon. Bloom contends that the School of Resentment threatens the nature of the canon itself and may lead to its eventual demise. Philosopher Richard Rorty[2] agreed that Bloom is at least partly accurate in describing the School of Resentment, writing that those identified by Bloom do in fact routinely use "subversive, oppositional discourse" to attack the canon specifically and Western culture in general.